[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
Skip header Section
User-Centered Design Stories: Real-World UCD Case StudiesApril 2007
Publisher:
  • Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
  • 340 Pine Street, Sixth Floor
  • San Francisco
  • CA
  • United States
ISBN:978-0-08-048155-5
Published:19 April 2007
Pages:
560
Skip Bibliometrics Section
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025Bibliometrics
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract

Intended for both the student and the practitioner, this is the first user-centered design casebook. It follows the Harvard Case study method, where the reader is placed in the role of the decision-maker in a real-life professional situation. In this book, the reader is asked to perform analysis of dozens of UCD work situations and propose solutions for the problem set. The problems posed in the cases cover a wide variety of key tasks and issues facing practitioners today, including those that are related to organizational/managerial topics, UCD methods and processes, and technical/ project issues. The benefit of the casebook and its organization is that it offers the new practitioner (as well as experienced practitioners working in new settings) the valuable practice in decision-making that one cannot get by reading a book or attending a seminar. *The first User-Centered Design Casebook, with cases covering the key tasks and issues facing UCD practitioners today. *Each chapter based on real world cases with complex problems, giving readers as close to a real-world experience as possible. * Offers "the things you don't learn in school," such as innovative and hybrid solutions that were actually used on the problems discussed.

References

  1. Christensen, C. (2000). The innovator's dilemma . New York: HarperBusiness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Covey, S. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people: restoring the character ethic . New York: Simon & Shuster.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Drucker, P. (2001). The essential Drucker . New York: HarperCollins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Herbold, R. (2004). The fiefdom syndrome: turf battles that undermine careers and companies--and how to overcome them. New York , Currency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwartz, B., and Reisberg, D. (1991). Learning and memory . New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stark, B., and Flaherty, J. (2003). The only negotiating guide you'll ever need: 101 ways to win in every time in any situation . New York: Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., and Righi, C. (2001). User-centered design: an integrated approach . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Autry, J. A. (1991). Love and profit, the art of caring leadership . New York: Avon Book.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., and Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in . New York: Penguin Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenzweig, E., and Ziff, J. (2003). Managing interdisciplinary relationships: lessons learned from the field. ACM Interactions , November/ December, 10; 6:20-27. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosenzweig, E., and Ziff, J. (2004). An iterative approach to better working relationship. Presented at the Usability Professionals' Association Annual Conference Proceedings, Tutorial, June 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rosenzweig, E., and Ziff, J. (2006). The humans in human factors. In Sherman, P. I. (Ed.). Usability success stories: how organizations improve by making easier-to-use software and websites . Hampshire, UK: Gower Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bias, R., and Mayhew, D. (2005). Cost-justifying usability: an update for the internet age . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bodine, K. (2006). The people who make great web sites. (September 13) Forrester Best Practices. Available at http://www.forrester.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dorsey, M., and Bodine, K. (2006). Culture and process drive better customer experiences. (March 31) Forrester Best Practices. Available at http://www.forrester.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Landauer, T. K. (1995). The trouble with computers: usefulness, usability, and productivity . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rummler, G. A., and Brache, A. P. (1990). Improving performance: how to manage the white space on the organization chart . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. The Standish Group. (1994). The CHAOS Report . Available at http:// www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/chaos_1994_1.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Strassmann, P. (1990). The business value of computers: an executive's guide . New Canaan, CT: Information Economics Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dumas, J., and Redish, G. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing . Revised Edition, Intellect, UK. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nielsen, J. (December 20, 1999). Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity . 1st, edition, Peachpit Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rubin, J. (February 1, 2001). Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests . John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Krug, S. Don't make me think: a commonsense approach to web usability . New Riders Press; 2nd edition August 18, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Christensen, C., and Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator's solution: creating and sustaining successful growth . Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackos, J., and Redish, J. (1998). User and task analysis for interface design . New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from ideo, america's leading design firm . New York: Doubleday Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayhew, D. (1999). The usability engineering lifecycle: a practitioner's handbook for user interface design . The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nielson, J. (2004). Risks of quantitative studies. Alertbox. Available at www.useit.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Verdenburg, K. (3002). Building ease of use into the IBM user experience. IBM Systems Journal , 42. Available at http://www.research.ibm.com/ journal/sj/424/vredenburg.html Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vogel, C., and Cagan, J. (2002). Creating breakthrough products: innovation from product planning to program approval. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Norman, D. (2002). The design of everyday things . New York: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Burstein, D., and Statsiowski, F. (1982). Project management for the design professional . London: The Architectural Press Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Dumas, J. A., and Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing , revised edition. Portland, Oregon: Intellect Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hackos, J. T. (1994). Managing your documentation projects . John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 145-209. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. James, J., and Righi, C. (2005). Sizing and specifying user-centered design projects. User Experience Magazine, Usability Professionals' Association , 4, pp. 8-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayhew, D. (1999). The usability engineering lifecycle: a practitioner's handbook for user interface design . Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., pp. 435-447. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. McDaniel, S. M. (2003). "Selling usability: scope and schedule estimates." Intercom , December:22-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Courage, C., and Baxter, K. (2005). Understanding your users: a practical guide to user requirements . San Francisco: Elsevier. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Deaton, M. (2002). Sorting techniques for user-centered information design . Available at http://www.mmdeaton.com/SortingTechniquesforInformationDesign.docGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, S. (1999). Cluster analysis for website organization: using cluster analysis to help meet users' expectations in site structure . Available at http://www.internettg.org/newsletter/dec99/cluster_analysis.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Maurer, D., and Warfel, T. (2004). Card sorting: a definitive guide . Available at http://www.boxesandarrows.com/archives/card_sorting_a_definitive_ guide.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. McGovern, G. (2002). Information architecture: using card sorting for web classification design . Available at http://www.gerrymcgovern.com/nt/2002/ nt_2002_09_23_card_sorting.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson, J. (2001). Information design using card sorting . Available at http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cardsorting/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tullis, T., and Wood, L. (2004). How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? Presented at the Proceedings of UPA 2004, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 7-11, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wodtke, C. (2003). Blueprints for the web: organization for the masses . Available at http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=30289&redir=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Agile Alliance. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development . Retrieved November 21, 2005, from Principles behind the Agile Manifesto website: http://www.agilemanifesto.org/principles.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Agile Alliance. (2005). What is agile software development? Retrieved November 17, 2005, from Agile Alliance website: http://www.agilealliance.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Anderson, J., Fleek, F., Garrity, K., and Drake, F. (2001). Integrating usability techniques into software development. IEEE Software , 18:46-53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Bias, R. G. (1994). The pluralistic usability walkthrough: coordinated empathies. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (Eds.). Usability inspection methods . New York: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Brooks, F. (1995). The mythical man-month: essays on software engineering . Anniversary edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Carroll, J. M. (Ed.). (1995). Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Davies, R. (2001). The power of stories . Retrieved May 30, 2006 from http://www.agilealliance.com/articles/daviesrachelthepowero/fileGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Davies, R. (2005). Agile requirements. Methods & Tools , 13:24-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ferre, X. (2003). Integration of usability techniques into the software development process. Presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop "Bridging the Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction" at ICSE 2003, Portland, Oregon, May 28-35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Gillan, D. J., Breedin, S. D., and Cooke, N. J. (1992). Network and multidimensional representations of the declarative knowledge of human-computer interface design experts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies , 36:587-615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Hwong, B., Laurance, D., Rudorfer, A., and Song, X. (2004). User-centered design and agile software development processes. Presented at "Identifying Gaps between HCI, Software Engineering and Design, and Boundary Objects to Bridge Them," a workshop held at the Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) 2004 Conference, Vienna, Austria, April. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Karat, C. M. (2005). A business case approach to usability cost justification for the web. In Bias, R. G., and Mayhew, D. J. (Eds.). Cost-justifying usability: an update for the Internet age . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Mayhew, D. (1999). The usability engineering life cycle . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things . New York: Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., and Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction design: beyond human computer interaction . New York: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Sommervile, I. (1996). Software process models. ACM Computing Surveys , 28:269-271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Vredenburg, K., Isensee, S., and Righi, C. (2002). User-centered design: an integrated approach . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, C. E., and Rosenbaum, S. (2005). Categories of return on investment and their practical implications. In Bias, R. G., and Mayhew, D. J. (Eds.). Cost-justifying usability: an update for the Internet age , 2nd edition. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Hackos, J. T., and Redish, J. C. (1998). User and task analysis for interface design . New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Mayhew, D. J. (1999). The usability engineering lifecycle . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Mayhew, D. J. (2001). Investing in requirements analysis . Available at http://www.taskz.com/ucd_invest_req_analysis_indepth.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Tullis, T., and Wood, L. E. (2004). How many users are enough for a card-sorting study? Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Usability Professionals Association, June 10-12, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Available at http://websort.net/articles/Tullis&Wood.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Wixon, D. R., and Ramey, J. (Eds.). (1996). Field methods casebook for software design . New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum . Indianapolis: SAMS. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Cooper, A., and Reimann, R. (2003). About face 2.0 . Indianapolis: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Hackos, J. T., and Redish, J. (1998). User and task analysis for interface design . New York: Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience . San Francisco: Elsevier Science. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Mulder, S., and Yaar, Z. (2007). The user is always right: a practical guide to creating and using personas for the web . Berkely: New Riders. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Pruitt, J., and Adlin, T. (2006). The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design . San Francisco: Elsevier Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Righi, C., and Clow, A. (February 2004). Programmers are people too: applying user-centered design to middleware . TaskZ.com article. Retrieved from http://www.taskz.com/ucd_righi4_indepth.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Rudd, J., Stern, K., and Isensee, S. (January 1996). Low- vs. high-fidelity prototyping debate . ACM/SIGCHI Interactions article. Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/230000/223514/p76-rudd.pdf?key1=22351 4&key2=1875646511&coll=&dl=GUIDE&CFID=15151515&CFTOKEN=6184618 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson, K., Rozanski, E., and Haake, A. (October 2004). Here, there, anywhere: remote usability testing that works . Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information Technology Education. Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1030000/1029567/p132-thompson.pdf?key 1=1029567&key2=6716646511&coll=portal&dl=ACM&CFID=482409& CFTOKEN=32903881 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. VMware, Inc. (2006). What is virtualization? Retrieved from http://www.vmware.com/virtualization/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. VMware, Inc. (2006). What is virtual infrastructure? Retrieved from http://www.vmware.com/vinfrastructure/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Jeffries, R., Miller, J. R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K. M. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques . Presented at CHI '91 Proceedings, (New Orleans, LA, April 28-May 2): pp. 119-124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. John, B. E. (1997). Tracking the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods. Behavior & Information Technology , 16:188-202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation . Presented at CHI '92, Proceedings (Monterey, CA, May 3-7), pp. 373-380. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Nielsen, J. (1994). Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics . Presented at CHI '94 Proceedings, (Boston, MA, April 24-28), pp. 152-158. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Nielsen, J., and Landauer, T. K. (1993). A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems . Presented at INTERCHI '93 Proceedings, Amsterdam, April 1993 pp. 206-213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. L. (1994). Usability inspection methods . John Wiley & Sons New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces . Presented at ACM CHI '90 Proceedings, (Seattle, WA, April 1-5), pp. 249-256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Tognazzizi, B. First principles of interaction design . Retrieved 8/27/06 from http://www.asktog.com/basics/firstPrinciples.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Vijavan, R. (1997). CS6751: Topic report, heuristic evaluation. Retrieved from http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/classes/cs6751_97_winter/Topics/heur-eval/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Beyer, H., and Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: defining customer centered systems . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Cooper and Reimann. (2003). About Face 2.0: the essentials of interaction design . Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Hackos, J., and Redish, J. (1998). User and task analysis for interface design . New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. McDaniel, S. (2003). Selling usability: scope and schedule estimates. Intercom , pp. 22-25. Retrieved from http://www.cognetics.com/papers/ others/intercom_1203.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface . Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping: the fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces . New York: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Van Duyne, D., Landay, J., and Hong, J. (2003). The design of sites: patterns, principles, and processes for crafting a customer-centered web experience . New York: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Donoghue, K. (2002). Built for use: driving profitability through the user experience . New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Fowler, S. (1998). GUI design handbook . New York: McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Garrett, J. (2003). The elements of user experience: user-centered design for the web . New York: American Institute of Graphic Arts, and Berkeley: New Riders Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Krug, S. (2000). Don't make me think: a common sense approach to web usability . Berkeley: New Riders Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Rosenfeld, L., and Morville, P. (2002). Information architecture for the World Wide Web , 2nd edition. Beijing: O'Reilly & Associates. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Saffer, D. (2003). Writing smart annotations . Retrieved from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/writing_smart_annotationsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Stott, L. (2004). Information architecture: a rose by any other name .... Retrieved from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ information_architecture_a_rose_by_any_other_name_Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. Willis, D. (2004). Are useful requirements just a fairy tale? (and why an IA should care). Retrieved from http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/ are_useful_requirements_just_a_fairy_tale_and_why_an_ia_should_care_Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Wodtke, C. (2003). Information architecture: blueprints for the web . Berkeley: New Riders Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. Americans with Disabilities Act: http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/statute.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): http://www.arnet.gov/far/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. Section 508: http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/508standards.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) maintains a listing of web accessibility international policies at http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG): http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. The Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing: http://www.agbell.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. American Council of the Blind: http://www.acb.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. American Foundation for the Blind: http://www.afb.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Attention Deficit Disorder Association: http://www.add.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Autism Resources: http://www.vaporia.com/autism/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. The British Deaf Organization: http://www.britishdeafassociation.org.uk/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Deaf Blind Information: http://www.lowvision.org/deaf_blind_ information.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. Dyslexia Adults Link: http://www.dyslexia-adults.com/info.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  119. Learning Disabilities Association of America: http://www.ldanatl.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Mental Retardation Fact Sheet: http://www.nichcy.org/pubs/factshe/ fs8txt.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. Mental Retardation-National Advocacy and Information Resources: http://www.therapistfinder.net/national/menret.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. National Council on Disability: http://www.ncd.gov/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. National Eye Institute (low vision information): http://www.nei.nih .gov/nehep/what.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. National Federation of the Blind: http://www.nfb.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. Royal Society of the Blind: http://www.rbs.org.au/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  126. AccVerify from HiSoftware is available at http://www.hisoftware .com/access/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  127. The Cynthia Says¿ Portal can be found at http://www.cynthiasays .com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  128. The Evaluation and Repair Working Group of the Web Accessibility Initiative has a list of almost 30 accessibility tools on their site: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/existingtoolsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  129. LIFT Online from UsableNet can be found at http://UsableNet.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  130. Watchfire's Bobby¿ can be found at http://bobby.watchfire.com/ bobby/html/en/index.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  131. A demo version is available on the IBM site at www.ibm.com/able/ hpr.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  132. JAWS 7.0 demonstration version: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ fs_products/software_jaws70fea.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  133. The Lynx Viewer can be found at http://www.delorie.com/web/ lynxview.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  134. Window-Eyes demo version: http://www.gwmicro.com/ Window-Eyes/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  135. Aykin, N. (Ed.) (2005). Usability and internationalization of information technology . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  136. CNNIC: http://www.cnnic.net.cn/en/index/index.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  137. Dong, J., and Salvendy, G. (1999). Designing menus for Chinese population: horizontal or vertical? In Behaviour & information technology , Vol. 18. Abingdon, Oxford, UK: Taylor & Francis, pp. 467-471.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  138. Ehret, B. (2002). Learning where to look: location learning in graphical user interfaces In CHI 2002 Conference Proceeding , Vol. 4, Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press, pp. 211-217. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  139. Fernandes, T. (1995). Global interface design . San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  140. Galdo, E., and Nielsen, J. (Eds.) (1996). International user interfaces . New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  141. Hofstede, G. (1997). Culture and organizations: software of the mind, intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival . New York: McGraw Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  142. Marcus, A. (2003). Fast forward, user-interface design and China: a great leap forward. Interactions , Jan/Feb:21-25. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  143. Mayhew, D. (1999). The usability engineering life cycle . San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  144. Sacher, H. (1998). Interactions in Chinese: designing interfaces for Asian languages. Interactions , Sept/Oct:28-38. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  145. Singh, N., and Pereira, A. (2005). The culturally customized website: customizing websites for the global marketplace . Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  146. Yunker, J. (2003). Beyond borders: web globalization strategies . Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  147. Aykin, N. (2004). Usability and internationalization of information technology . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  148. Del Gaddo, E., and Nielsen, J. (Eds.) (1996). International user interfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  149. Dray, S. (1996). Designing for the rest of the world: a consultant's observations. Interactions , 3:15-18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  150. Fernandes, T. (1995). Global interface design: a guide to designing international user interfaces . New York: Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  151. Butler, J., Holden, K., and Lidwell, W. (2003). Universal principles of design , Gloucester, MA: Rockport Publishers, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  152. Cockton, G., and Woolrych, A. (2001). Understanding inspection methods: lessons from an assessment of heuristic evaluation. Published in People and Computers XV--Interaction Without Frontiers , (2001). Blandford, A., Vanderdonckt, J., & Gray, P. (Eds.), London, UK: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  153. Disability Rights Commission, http://www.drc-gb.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  154. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research , Chicago: Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  155. IBM (1993). Object-oriented interface design: IBM common user access guidelines , Carmel, Indiana: QUE Pub. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  156. IBM Ease of Use (2003). User engineering method . Retrieved from www.ibm.com/easyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  157. IEEE WG12, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  158. ISO 9241. International organization for standardisation. Ergonomic requirements for visual display terminals . Retrieved from www.iso-orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  159. Jeffries, R., Miller, J, Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K. (1991). User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1991, Reaching Through Technology, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  160. Karat, C.-M., Campbell, R., and Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1992, Monterey, California, United States. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  161. Keenan, S., Hartson, H., Kafura, D., and Schulman, R. (1999). The usability problem taxonomy: a framework for classification and analysis. Empirical Software Engineering , 4, 71-104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  162. Miles, M., and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook , Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  163. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review , 63:81-97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  164. Norman, K. (1991). The psychology of menu selection: designing cognitive control at the human/computer interface , Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  165. Nielsen, J., and Mack, R. (1994). Usability inspection methods . New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  166. Oasis consortium, www.oasis-open.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  167. Royal National Institute for the Blind, www.rnib.org.ukGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  168. World Health Organization, www.who.int/classifications/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  169. Rettig, M. (1994). Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM , 37:21-27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  170. Righi, C. (2001). Building the conceptual model and metaphor: the "3 × 3". In Branaghan, R. (Ed.). Design for people by people: essay on usability . Chicago: Usability Professionals' Association, pp. 213-219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  171. Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping . San Francisco: Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  172. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum . Indianapolis, IN: Sams. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  173. Dumas, J., and Redish, J. (1993). A practical guide to usability testing . Intellect Books. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  174. Van Duyne, D., Landay, J., and Hong, J. (2002). The design of sites: patterns, principles, and processes for crafting a customer-centered web experience . Boston, San Francisco, New York: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  175. Weinstein, A. (2004). Handbook of market segmentation: strategic targeting for business and technology firms . Haworth Series in Segmented, Targeted, and Customized Market. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  176. ANSI (2001). Common industry format for usability test reports (ANSI-NCITS 354-2001) . Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  177. Bias, R., and Mayhew, D. (1994). Cost justifying usability . San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  178. Hackos, J. T., and Redish J.C. (1998). User and task analysis for user interface design . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  179. Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  180. Whiteside, J. (1993). The Phoenix agenda: power to transform your workplace . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Contributors
  • International Business Machines
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Recommendations