[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/169059.169166acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems

Published: 01 May 1993 Publication History

Abstract

For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or benefits. Results of early tests can provide estimates of the number of problems left to be found and the number of additional evaluations needed to find a given fraction. With quantitative evaluation costs and detection values, the model can estimate the numbers of evaluations at which optimal cost/benefit ratios are obtained and at which marginal utility vanishes. For a “medium” example, we estimate that 16 evaluations would be worth their cost, with maximum benefit/cost ratio at four.

References

[1]
Dalal, S.R., and Mallows, C.L. (1988). When should one stop testing software? J. American Statistical Association 83, 403 (September), 872-879.
[2]
Dalai, S.R., and Mallows, C.L. (1990). Some graphical aids for deciding when to stop testing software. IEEE J. Selected Areas in Communication 8, 2 (February), 169- 175.
[3]
Erhan, S. (1975). Introduction to Stochastic Processes. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. p. 87.
[4]
Gray, W.D., John, B.E., and Atwood, M.E. (1992). The precis of project Ernestine, or, an overview of a validation of GOMS. Proc. ACM CHI'92 (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 307-312.
[5]
Jeffries, R., Miller, J.R., Wharton, C., and Uyeda, K.M. (1991 ). User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques. Proc. ACM CHI'91 (New Orleans, LA, 27 April-2 May), 119-124.
[6]
Jq~rgensen, A.H. (1989). Using the thinking-aloud method in system development. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 743-750.
[7]
Karat, C., Campbell, R., Fiegel, T. (1992). Comparisons of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. Proc. ACM CHI'92 (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 397-404.
[8]
Lewis, C. (1982). Using the 'thinking-aloud' method in cognitive interface design. Research Report RC-9265, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.
[9]
Lewis, J.R., Henry, S.C., and Mack, R.L. (I 990). Integrated office software benchmarks: A case study. Proc. INTERACT'90 3rd IFIP Conf. Human-Computer Interaction (Cambridge, U.K., 27-31 August 1990), 337-343.
[10]
Mantei, M.M., and Teorey, T.J. (1988). Cost/benefit analysis for incorporating human factors in the software lifecycle. Communications of the ACM 31, 4 (April), 428-439.
[11]
Molich, R., and Nielsen, J. (1990). Improving a humancomputer dialogue. Communications of the A CM 33, 3 (March), 338-348.
[12]
Nielsen, J. (1989). Usability engineering at a discount. In Salvendy, G., and Smith, M.J. (Eds.), Designing and Using Human-Computer Interfaces and Knowledge Based Systems, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. 394-401.
[13]
Nielsen, J. (1990). Big paybacks from 'discount' usability engineering. IEEE Software 7, 3 (May), 107-108.
[14]
Nielsen, J. (1992). Evaluating the thinking aloud technique for use by computer scientists. In Hartson, H.R., and Hix, D. (Eds.), Advances in Human--Computer Interaction Vol. 3, Ablex. 69-82.
[15]
Nielsen, J. (1992). Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. Proc. ACM CHI'92 (Monterey, CA, 3-7 May), 373-380.
[16]
Nielsen, J. (1992). The usability engineering lifecycle. IEEE Computer 25, 3 (March), 12-22.
[17]
Nielsen, J. (1993). Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test. Intl. J. Man-Machine Studies in press.
[18]
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
[19]
Nielsen, J. (1993). Iterative design of user interfaces. IEEE Computer 26 (to appear, probably in the July issue).
[20]
Nielsen, J. (1993). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L. (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. Book in preparation.
[21]
Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proc. ACM CHI'90 (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), 249-256. "
[22]
Virzi, R.A. (1990). Streamlining the design process: Running fewer subjects. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (Orlando, FL, 8-12 October), 291-294.
[23]
Virzi, R.A. (1992). Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects are enough? Human Factors 34, 4 (August), 457-468.
[24]
Wright, P.C., and Monk, A.F. (1991). A cost-effective evaluation method for use by designers. Intl. J. Man- Machine Studies 35, 6 (December), 891-912.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Interactive digital narratives for mental resilience: Understanding the player experience of betwixtEntertainment Computing10.1016/j.entcom.2024.10091652(100916)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2025)The evaluation of an educational game to promote pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learningEntertainment Computing10.1016/j.entcom.2024.10083652(100836)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Usability testing of a novel interlocking three-dimensional miniplate for mandibular angle fracturesArchives of Craniofacial Surgery10.7181/acfs.2024.0029025:4(171-178)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '93: Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 1993
547 pages
ISBN:0897915755
DOI:10.1145/169059
  • Chairmen:
  • Bert Arnold,
  • Gerrit van der Veer,
  • Ted White
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 May 1993

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Poisson models
  2. cost-benefit analysis
  3. heuristic evaluation
  4. iterative design
  5. usability engineering
  6. usability problems
  7. user testing

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

INTERCHI93
Sponsor:
INTERCHI93: Conference on Human Factors in Computing
April 24 - 29, 1993
Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Acceptance Rates

CHI '93 Paper Acceptance Rate 62 of 330 submissions, 19%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4,293
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)566
Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Interactive digital narratives for mental resilience: Understanding the player experience of betwixtEntertainment Computing10.1016/j.entcom.2024.10091652(100916)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2025)The evaluation of an educational game to promote pre-service teachers’ self-regulated learningEntertainment Computing10.1016/j.entcom.2024.10083652(100836)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)Usability testing of a novel interlocking three-dimensional miniplate for mandibular angle fracturesArchives of Craniofacial Surgery10.7181/acfs.2024.0029025:4(171-178)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Avaliação de Usabilidade de Jogos Educacionais para pessoas com a Síndrome de Williams-BeurenRevista Brasileira de Informática na Educação10.5753/rbie.2024.245232(181-212)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Avaliação da inovação em projetos de pesquisa: proposta do artefato Gerenciador de Inovação em Projetos de Pesquisa para Instituições de Ciência e Tecnologia (GIPPICT)International Journal of Innovation10.5585/2024.2609312:4(e26093)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Grafik Tasarım Pratiğinde Üretken Yapay Zekânın Etkinliği Üzerine Nitel Bir AraştırmaJournal of Computational Design10.53710/jcode.14201465:1(105-138)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024
  • (2024)CARIAInternational Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education10.4018/IJICTE.35649920:1(1-24)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
  • (2024)A Holistic and Multidimensional Methodology Proposal for a Persona with Total Visual Impairment Archetype on the WebSocieties10.3390/soc1407010214:7(102)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Support Tool for Emergency Management in Smart Campuses: Reference Architecture and Enhanced Web User InterfacesSensors10.3390/s2418588724:18(5887)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating the Usability of mHealth Apps: An Evaluation Model Based on Task Analysis Methods and Eye Movement DataHealthcare10.3390/healthcare1213131012:13(1310)Online publication date: 30-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media