More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Toward Understanding the Design of Intertwined Human–Computer Integrations

Authors:

Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller,

Nathan Semertzidis,

Louise Matjeka,

Yash MehtaAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Volume 30, Issue 5

Article No.: 73, Pages 1 - 45

https://doi.org/10.1145/3590766

Published: 23 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Human–computer integration is an HCI trend in which computational machines can have agency, i.e., take control. Our work focuses on a particular form of integration in which the user and the computational machine share agency over the user's body, that is, can simultaneously (in contrast to a traditional turn-taking approach) control the user's body. The result is a user experience where the agency of the user and the computational machine is so intertwined that it is often no more discernable who contributed what to what extent; we call this “intertwined integration”. Due to the recency of advanced technologies enabling intertwined integration systems, we find that little understanding and documented design knowledge exist. To begin constructing such an understanding, we use three case studies to propose two key dimensions (“awareness of machine's agency” and “alignment of machine's agency”) to articulate a design space for intertwined integration systems. We differentiate four roles that computational machines can assume in this design space (angel, butler, influencer, and adversary). Based on our craft knowledge gained through designing such intertwined integration systems, we discuss strategies to help designers create future systems. Ultimately, we aim at advancing the HCI field's emerging understanding of sharing agency.

References

[1]

D. A. Abbink, T. Carlson, M. Mulder, J. C. de Winter, F. Aminravan, T. L. Gibo, and E. R. Boer. 2018. A topology of shared control systems—finding common ground in diversity. IEEE Transactions on Human–Machine Systems 48, 5 (2018), 509–525.

[2]

A. T. Adams, J. Costa, M. F. Jung, and T. Choudhury. 2015. Mindless computing: Designing technologies to subtly influence behavior. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 719–730

Digital Library

[3]

A. Alfaro, Á. Bernabeu, C. Agulló, J. Parra, and E. Fernández. 2015. Hearing colors: An example of brain plasticity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 9 (2015), 56.

[4]

J. Allen, C. I. Guinn, and E. Horvtz. 1999. Mixed-initiative interaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 14, 5 (2015), 14–23.

Digital Library

[5]

D. Altimira, F. Mueller, J. Clarke, G. Lee, M. Billinghurst, and C. Bartneck. 2016. Digitally augmenting sports: An opportunity for exploring and understanding novel balancing techniques. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1681–1691

Digital Library

[6]

J. Andres, J. de Hoog, J. von Känel, J. Berk, B. Le, X. Wang, M. Brazil, and F. Mueller. 2016. Exploring Human: eBike interaction to support rider autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 85–92.

Digital Library

[7]

J. Andres, J. d. Hoog, and F. Mueller. 2018. “I had super-powers when eBike riding” towards understanding the design of integrated exertion. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 19–31. DOI:

Digital Library

[8]

J. Andres, T. Kari, J. v. Kaenel, and F. Mueller. 2019. ‘Co-riding with my eBike to get green lights’. In Proceedings of the 2019 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS). ACM, 1251–1263. DOI:

Digital Library

[9]

J. Andres, m. c. Schraefel, N. Semertzidis, B. Dwivedi, Y. C. Kulwe, J. v. Kaenel, and F. Mueller. 2020. Introducing peripheral awareness as a neurological state for human–computer integration. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, 1–13.

Digital Library

[10]

J. Andres, N. Semertzidis, Z. Li, Y. Wang, and F. F. Mueller. 2022. Integrated exertion–understanding the design of human–computer integration in an exertion context. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction 29, 6 (2022), 1--28.

Digital Library

[11]

E. S. Arza, H. Kurra, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2018. Feed the Food Monsters!: Helping Co-diners chew their food better with augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play Extended Abstracts (CHI PLAY). ACM, 391–397.

Digital Library

[12]

Auxivo. 2021. Auxivo carrysuit exoskeleton field testing on construction site. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe2d9YQF75o.

[13]

Auxivo. 2022a. The advance educational exoskeleton EduExo pro. Retrieved from https://www.auxivo.com/eduexo-pro.

[14]

Auxivo. 2022b. How to control a robotic exoskeleton. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/h7VR_WDfWy0.

[15]

L. Bareket, L. Inzelberg, D. Rand, M. David-Pur, D. Rabinovich, B. Brandes, and Y. Hanein. 2016. Temporary-tattoo for long-term high fidelity biopotential recordings. Scientific Reports 6 (2016), 25727.

[16]

C. Bartneck and J. Forlizzi. 2004. A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. RO-MAN 2004. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759). IEEE, 591–594.

[17]

M. Beaudouin-Lafon. 2000. Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 446–453

Digital Library

[18]

M. Beaudouin-Lafon. 2004. Designing interaction, not interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. ACM, 15–22. DOI:

Digital Library

[19]

G. Beavers and H. Hexmoor. 2003. Types and limits of agent autonomy. International Workshop on Computational Autonomy. Springer, 95–102.

[20]

S. Benford, G. Giannachi, B. Koleva, and T. Rodden. 2009. From interaction to trajectories: Designing coherent journeys through user experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 709–718. DOI:

Digital Library

[21]

S. Benford, C. Greenhalgh, A. Crabtree, M. Flintham, B. Walker, J. Marshall, B. Koleva, S. Rennick Egglestone, G. Giannachi, and M. Adams. 2013. Performance-led research in the wild. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 3 (2013), 1–22.

Digital Library

[22]

S. Benford, C. Greenhalgh, G. Giannachi, B. Walker, J. Marshall, and T. Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable interactions. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2005–2014. DOI:

Digital Library

[23]

S. Benford, R. Ramchurn, J. Marshall, M. L. Wilson, M. Pike, S. Martindale, A. Hazzard, C. Greenhalgh, M. Kallionpää, and P. Tennent. 2020. Contesting control: Journeys through surrender, self-awareness and looseness of control in embodied interaction. Human–Computer Interaction (2020).

[24]

S. Benford, H. Schnädelbach, B. Koleva, R. Anastasi, C. Greenhalgh, T. Rodden, J. Green, A. Ghali, T. Pridmore, and B. Gaver. 2005. Expected, sensed, and desired: A framework for designing sensing-based interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 1 (2005), 3–30.

Digital Library

[25]

B. Berberian. 2019. Man-machine teaming: A problem of Agency. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 34 (2019), 118–123.

[26]

J. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, D. Coyle, J. Knibbe, and K. Hornbæk. 2018. I really did that: Sense of agency with touchpad, keyboard, and on-skin interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–8.

Digital Library

[27]

D. R. Billings, K. E. Schaefer, J. Y. Chen, V. Kocsis, M. Barrera, J. Cook et al. 2012. Human-animal trust as an analog for human-robot trust: A review of current evidence.

[28]

J. M. Bradshaw, P. Feltovich, and M. Johnson. 2011. Human-agent interaction. Handbook of Human–Machine Interaction (2011), 283–302.

[29]

J. M. Bradshaw, P. J. Feltovich, H. Jung, S. Kulkarni, W. Taysom, and A. Uszok. 2003. Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Autonomy. Springer, 17–39.

[30]

N. Braun, S. Debener, N. Spychala, E. Bongartz, P. Sörös, H. H. Müller, and A. Philipsen. 2018. The senses of agency and ownership: A review. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2018), 535.

[31]

L. M. Britton and B. Semaan. 2017. Manifesting the cyborg through techno-body modification: From human–computer interaction to integration. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2499–2510

Digital Library

[32]

R. Byrne, J. Marshall, and F. F. Mueller. 2020. Designing digital vertigo experiences. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 3 (2020), 1–30.

Digital Library

[33]

T. A. Carlson, G. Alvarez, D.-a. Wu, and F. A. Verstraten. 2010. Rapid assimilation of external objects into the body schema. Psychological Science 21, 7 (2010), 1000–1005.

[34]

S. Ciochetto and B. Haley. How do you measure “awareness”? Experiences with the lead-based paint survey. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/sm9501.pdf.

[35]

A. Clark. 2001. Natural-born cyborgs? In Proceedings of the Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind. Springer, 17–24.

[36]

E. E. A. Cohen, R. Ejsmond-Frey, N. Knight, and R. I. M. Dunbar. 2010. Rowers' high: behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biology Letters 6, 1 (2010), 106.

[37]

D. Coyle, J. Moore, P. O. Kristensson, P. Fletcher, and A. Blackwell. 2012. I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2025–2034.

Digital Library

[38]

M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Performance. Harper and Row, New York.

[39]

V. Danry, P. Pataranutaporn, F. Mueller, P. Maes, and S.-w. Leigh. 2022. On eliciting a sense of self when integrating with computers. Augmented Humans (2022), 68–81.

[40]

F. De Vignemont. 2010. Body schema and body image—Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 48, 3 (2010), 669–680.

[41]

M. Deen, R. Cercos, A. Chatman, A. Naseem, R. Bernhaupt, A. Fowler et al. 2014. Game jam: [4 research]. In Proceedings of the CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 25–28. DOI:

Digital Library

[42]

J. Deng, P. Olivier, J. Andres, K. Ellis, R. Wee, and F. Floyd Mueller. 2022. Logic Bonbon: Exploring Food as Computational Artifact.

[43]

S. Deterding, J. Hook, R. Fiebrink, M. Gillies, J. Gow, M. Akten et al. 2017. Mixed-initiative creative interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 628–635.

Digital Library

[44]

Diitalarti. 2016. INFERNO: I was a robot at Elektra Festival. Retrieved from https://media.digitalarti.com/blog/digitalarti_mag/inferno_i_was_a_robot_at_elektra_festival.

[45]

P. Dourish. 2001. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Boston, MA.

[46]

S. Dow, W. Ju, and W. Mackay. 2013. Projection, place and point-of-view in research through design. The Sage Handbook of Digital Technology Research (2013), 266.

[47]

D. England, E. Hornecker, C. Roast, P. Romero, P. Fergus, and P. Marshall. 2009. Workshop on whole-body interactions. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Extended Abstracts, Boston, MA, 1–4. Retrieved from http://lister.cms.livjm.ac.uk/homepage/staff/cmsdengl/WBI2009/.

[48]

Exoskeleton report. 2017. Retrieved from https://exoskeletonreport.com/product-tag/powered/.

[49]

U. Farooq and J. Grudin. 2016. Human–computer integration. Interactions 23, 6 (2016), 26–32.

Digital Library

[50]

R. Fleck and G. Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer–Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer–Human Interaction. ACM, 216–223. DOI:

Digital Library

[51]

A. Fogel. 2013. Body sense: The science and practice of embodied self-awareness (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology): ww norton & company.

[52]

C. Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 1 (2019), Article 2.

[53]

S. Gallagher. 1986. Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. The Journal of Mind and Behavior (1986), 541–554.

[54]

S. Gallagher. 2013. Ambiguity in the sense of agency. Decomposing the Will (2013), 118–135.

[55]

B. Gaver and J. Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (2012), 40–49.

Digital Library

[56]

W. Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 937–946. DOI:

Digital Library

[57]

W. W. Gaver, J. Beaver, and S. Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 233–240.

Digital Library

[58]

M. Ghajargar and J. Bardzell. 2019. What design education tells us about design theory: A pedagogical genealogy. Digital Creativity 30, 4 (2012), 277–299.

[59]

M. Ghajargar and J. Bardzell. 2021. Synthesis of forms: integrating practical and reflective qualities in design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[60]

M. Ghajargar and M. Wiberg. 2018. Thinking with interactive artifacts: Reflection as a concept in design outcomes. Design Issues 34, 2 (2018), 48–63.

[61]

M. Ghajargar, M. Wiberg, and E. Stolterman. 2018. Designing IoT systems that support reflective thinking: A relational approach. International Journal of Design 12, 1 (2018), 21–35.

[62]

S. Göbel, S. Hardy, V. Wendel, F. Mehm, and R. Steinmetz. 2010. Serious games for health: personalized exergames. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1663–1666.

Digital Library

[63]

K. H. Goodrich, P. C. Schutte, F. O. Flemisch, and R. A. Williams. 2006. Application of the H-mode, a design and interaction concept for highly automated vehicles, to aircraft. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/AIAA 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference. IEEE, 1–13.

[64]

M. A. Goodrich and A. C. Schultz. 2008. Human–robot interaction: A Survey. Now Publishers Inc.

Digital Library

[65]

Grand View Research. 2018. Exoskeleton Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Type (Mobile, Stationary), By Drive Type, By End-use (Healthcare, Military, Industrial), And Segment Forecasts, 2018–2025. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/exoskeleton-market.

[66]

S. A. Green, M. Billinghurst, X. Chen, and J. G. Chase. 2008. Human–robot collaboration: A literature review and augmented reality approach in design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 5, 1 (2008), 1.

[67]

S. Greenberg, S. Boring, J. Vermeulen, and J. Dostal. 2014. Dark patterns in proxemic interactions: A critical perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 523–532.

Digital Library

[68]

E. Grosz. 2020. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Routledge.

[69]

J. Grudin, K. Höök, P. Maes, and F. Mueller. 2018. Human–Computer Integration. Retrieved from https://www.dagstuhl.de/en/program/calendar/semhp/?semnr=18322.

[70]

L. Hallnäs and J. Redström. 2001. Slow technology–designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 3 (2001), 201–212.

Digital Library

[71]

P. Hamalainen, J. Marshall, R. Kajastila, R. Byrne, and F. Mueller. 2015. Utilizing gravity in movement-based games and play. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 67–77. DOI:

Digital Library

[72]

D. Haraway. 2006. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In Proceedings of the International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments. Springer, 117–158.

[73]

M. Hassan, F. Daiber, F. Wiehr, F. Kosmalla, A. Kr, #252, and ger. 2017. FootStriker: An EMS-based foot strike assistant for running. In Proceedings of the ACM Interactive, Mobile, Wearable Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 1 (2017), 1–18.

Digital Library

[74]

A. Hillier. 2008. Childhood overweight and the built environment: Making technology part of the solution rather than part of the problem. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 615, 1 (2008), 56–82.

[75]

G. Hoffman. 2019. Evaluating fluency in human–robot collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Human–Machine Systems 49, 3 (2019), 209–218.

[76]

J. Hollan and S. Stornetta. 1992. Beyond being there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 119–125. Retrieved from

Digital Library

[77]

K. Höök. 2010. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries 2010. ACM, 226--235.

[78]

K. Höök. 2018. Designing with the body: Somaesthetic Interaction Design. MIT Press.

[79]

K. Höök, M. P. Jonsson, A. Ståhl, and J. Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic appreciation design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3131–3142.

Digital Library

[80]

K. Höök and J. Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction 19, 3 (2012), 1–18.

Digital Library

[81]

E. Hornecker and J. Buur. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 437–446.

Digital Library

[82]

E. Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 159–166.

Digital Library

[83]

C. Hummels, K. C. J. Overbeeke, and S. Klooster. 2007. Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8 (2007), 677–690.

[84]

K. Isbister, K. Höök, M. Sharp, and J. Laaksolahti. 2006. The sensual evaluation instrument: Developing an affective evaluation tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1163–1172.

Digital Library

[85]

S. Jackson and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1999. Flow in Sports: The Keys to Optimal Experiences and Performances. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, IL.

[86]

R. Jacob, A. Girouard, L. Hirshfield, M. Horn, O. Shaer, E. Solovey, and J. Zigelbaum. 2008. Reality-based interaction: A framework for post-WIMP interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 201–210.

Digital Library

[87]

L.-E. Janlert and E. Stolterman. 2017. Things that Keep us Busy: The Elements of Interaction. MIT Press.

[88]

M. M. Jensen and F. Mueller. 2014. Running with technology: where are we heading? In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer–Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design. ACM, 527–530. DOI:

Digital Library

[89]

Y. Jiang, J. M. King, and W. Prinyawiwatkul. 2014. A review of measurement and relationships between food, eating behavior and emotion. Trends in Food Science & Technology 36, 1 (2014), 15–28.

[90]

M. Johnson and G. Rose. 2015. Extending life on the bike: Electric bike use by older Australians. Journal of Transport & Health 2, 2 (2015), 276–283.

[91]

M. Jonsson, A. Ståhl, J. Mercurio, A. Karlsson, N. Ramani, and K. Höök. 2016. The aesthetics of heat: Guiding awareness with thermal stimuli. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3131--3142.

[92]

E. Jovanov. 2006. Wireless technology and system integration in body area networks for m-health applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 7158–7160.

[93]

W. Ju and L. Leifer. 2008. The design of implicit interactions: Making interactive systems less obnoxious. Design Issues 24, 3 (2008), 72–84.

[94]

H. Jung. 2020. Search of forms for evocative and generative reflection: Exploratory studies and a design proposal. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[95]

V. Kalnikaite, J. Bird, and Y. Rogers. 2013. Decision-making in the aisles: Informing, overwhelming or nudging supermarket shoppers? Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 6 (2013), 1247–1259.

Digital Library

[96]

H.-L. Kao, C. Holz, A. Roseway, A. Calvo, and C. Schmandt. 2016. DuoSkin: rapidly prototyping on-skin user interfaces using skin-friendly materials. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 16–23.

Digital Library

[97]

S. Kasahara, J. Nishida, and P. Lopes. 2019. Preemptive action: Accelerating human reaction using electrical muscle stimulation without compromising agency. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–15.

Digital Library

[98]

D. V. Keyson, M. P. de Hoogh, A. Freudenthal, and A. P. Vermeeren. 2000. The intelligent thermostat: A mixed-initiative user interface. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 59--60.

[99]

R. A. Khot, D. Aggarwal, R. Pennings, L. Hjorth, and F. Mueller. 2017. EdiPulse: Investigating a playful approach to self-monitoring through 3D printed chocolate treats. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6593–6607.

Digital Library

[100]

R. A. Khot, L. Hjorth, and F. Mueller. 2020. Shelfie: A framework for designing material representations of physical activity data. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interactions (TOCHI) 27, 3 (2020), Article 14.

[101]

R. A. Khot and F. Mueller. 2019. Human–Food interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 4 (2019), 238–415.

Digital Library

[102]

R. A. Khot, R. Pennings, and F. F. Mueller. 2015a. EdiPulse: Supporting physical activity with chocolate printed messages. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1391–1396. DOI:

Digital Library

[103]

R. A. Khot, R. Pennings, and F. F. Mueller. 2015b. EdiPulse: Turning physical activity into chocolates. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 331–334. DOI:

Digital Library

[104]

S. Klemmer and B. Hartmann. 2006. How Bodies Matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. University Park, PA, 140–149.

Digital Library

[105]

S. Kozubaev, C. Elsden, N. Howell, M. L. J. Søndergaard, N. Merrill, B. Schulte, and R. Y. Wong. 2020. Expanding modes of reflection in design futuring. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.

Digital Library

[106]

J. La Delfa, M. A. Baytas, R. Patibanda, H. Ngari, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2020. Drone Chi: Somaesthetic human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[107]

S.-w. Leigh and P. Maes. 2016. Body integrated programmable joints interface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6053–6057. DOI:

Digital Library

[108]

S.-w. Leigh, H. Sareen, H.-L. C. Kao, X. Liu, and P. Maes. 2017. Body-Borne computers as extensions of self. Computers 6, 1 (2017), 12.

[109]

J. C. Licklider. 1960. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics 1 (1960), 4–11.

[110]

D. A. Lieberman. 2006. Dance Games and Other Exergames: What the Research Says. Retrieved from http://www.comm.ucsb.edu/faculty/lieberman/exergames.htm.

[111]

H. Limerick, D. Coyle, and J. W. Moore. 2014. The experience of agency in human–computer interactions: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014), 643.

[112]

S. E. Lindley and A. F. Monk. 2008. Social enjoyment with electronic photograph displays: Awareness and control. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 66, 8 (2008), 587–604.

Digital Library

[113]

I. E. Lofgren. 2015. Mindful eating: An emerging approach for healthy weight management. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 9, 3 (2015), 212–216.

[114]

L. Loke and T. Robertson. 2013. Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20, 1 (2013), 7.

Digital Library

[115]

P. Lopes and P. Baudisch. 2017. Immense power in a tiny package: Wearables based on electrical muscle stimulation. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 3 (2017), 12–16.

Digital Library

[116]

P. Lopes, D. Yuksel, F. Guimbretiere, and P. Baudisch. 2016. Muscle-plotter: An interactive system based on electrical muscle stimulation that produces spatial output. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Tokyo, Japan. ACM, 207–217. DOI:

Digital Library

[117]

S. Lopes, M. Lima, and K. Silva. 2020. Nature can get it out of your mind: The rumination reducing effects of contact with nature and the mediating role of awe and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology 71 (2020), 101489.

[118]

J. Marshall, A. Dancu, and F. Mueller. 2016. Interaction in motion: Designing truly mobile interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 215–228. DOI:

Digital Library

[119]

J. Marshall, D. Rowland, S. R. Egglestone, S. Benford, B. Walker, and D. McAuley. 2011. Breath control of amusement rides. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 73–82. DOI:

Digital Library

[120]

E. Matheson, R. Minto, E. G. Zampieri, M. Faccio, and G. Rosati. 2019. Human–robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: A review. Robotics 8, 4 (2019), 100.

[121]

M. Mauriello, M. Gubbels, and J. E. Froehlich. 2014. Social fabric fitness: The design and evaluation of wearable E-textile displays to support group running. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2833–2842.

Digital Library

[122]

Y. D. Mehta, R. A. Khot, R. Patibanda, and F. Mueller. 2018. Arm-A-Dine: Towards understanding the design of playful embodied eating experiences. Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 299–313. DOI:

Digital Library

[123]

Meta.Morf. 2018. Inferno. Retrieved from http://metamorf.no/2018/project/inferno-louis-philippe-demers-bill-vorn/index.html.

[124]

P. Mildner and F. Mueller. 2016. Design of Serious Games. In Serious Games: Foundations, Concepts and Practice. R. Dörner, S. Göbel, W. Effelsberg, & J. Wiemeyer (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham. 57–82. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1_3. DOI:

[125]

J. W. Moore. 2016. What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016), 1272.

[126]

J. W. Moore and P. C. Fletcher. 2012. Sense of agency in health and disease: A review of cue integration approaches. Consciousness and Cognition 21, 1 (2012), 59–68.

[127]

F. Mueller. 2002. Exertion Interfaces: Sports over a Distance for Social Bonding and Fun (Unpublished Master's thesis), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA.

[128]

F. Mueller and S. Agamanolis. 2007. Exertion interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2857–2860. DOI:

Digital Library

[129]

F. Mueller and S. Agamanolis. 2008. Exertion interfaces. In Proceedings of the CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3957–3960. DOI:

Digital Library

[130]

F. Mueller, S. Agamanolis, and R. Picard. 2002. Exertion interfaces for sports over a distance. In Proceedings of the UIST 2002 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - Conference Companion. ACM, 11–12. Retrieved from http://uist.hosting.acm.org/archive/adjunct/2002/pdf/posters/p11-mueller.pdf.

[131]

F. Mueller, S. Agamanolis, and R. Picard. 2003. Exertion interfaces: Sports over a distance for social bonding and fun. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM, 561–568. DOI:

Digital Library

[132]

F. Mueller, S. Agamanolis, F. Vetere, and M. R. Gibbs. 2009. A framework for exertion interactions over a distance. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games. ACM, 143–150. DOI:

Digital Library

[133]

F. Mueller, J. Andres, J. Marshall, D. Svanaes, m. c. schraefel, K. Gerling. 2018. Body-centric computing: Results from a weeklong Dagstuhl seminar in a German castle. Interactions 25, 4 (2018), 34–39.

Digital Library

[134]

F. Mueller and N. Berthouze. 2010. Evaluating exertion games—experiences from investigating movement-based games. In Evaluating User Experiences in Games. R. Bernhaupt (Ed.). Springer, New York. 187–207. DOI:

[135]

F. Mueller, R. Byrne, J. Andres, and R. Patibanda. 2018. Experiencing the body as play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[136]

F. Mueller, T. Dwyer, S. Goodwin, K. Marriott, J. Deng, and H. Phan, 2021. Data as delight: Eating data. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–14.

Digital Library

[137]

F. Mueller, D. Edge, F. Vetere, M. Gibbs, S. Agamanolis, B. Bongers, and J. Sheridan. 2011. Designing sports: A framework for exertion games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'11. ACM, 2651–2660.

Digital Library

[138]

F. Mueller and M. R. Gibbs. 2006. A table tennis game for three players. In Proceedings of the 18th Australia Conference on Computer–Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments. ACM, 321–324. DOI:

Digital Library

[139]

F. Mueller and M. R. Gibbs. 2007. Building a table tennis game for three players. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 179–182. DOI:

Digital Library

[140]

F. Mueller, M. R. Gibbs, F. Vetere, and D. Edge. 2017. Designing for bodily interplay in social exertion games. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24, 3 (2017), 1–41.

Digital Library

[141]

F. Mueller and M. Karau. 2002. Transparent hearing. In Proceedings of the CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 730–731. DOI:

Digital Library

[142]

F. Mueller, T. Kari, R. Khot, Z. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Mehta, and P. Arnold. 2018. Towards experiencing eating as a form of play. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 559–567. DOI:

Digital Library

[143]

F. Mueller, T. Kari, Z. Li, Y. Wang, Y. D. Mehta, J. Andres, J. Marquez, and R. Patibanda. 2020. Towards designing bodily integrated play. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI). ACM, 207–218.

Digital Library

[144]

F. Mueller, P. Lopes, J. Andres, R. Byrne, N. Semertzidis, Z. Li, J. Knibbe, and S. Greuter. 2021. Towards understanding the design of bodily integration. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 152 (2021), 102643.

[145]

F. Mueller, P. Lopes, P. Strohmeier, W. Ju, C. Seim, M. Weigel, S. Nanayakkara, M. Obrist, Z. Li, J. Delfa, J. Nishida, E. M. Gerber, D. Svanaes, J. Grudin, S. Greuter, K. Kunze, T. Erickson, S. Greenspan, M. Inami, J. Marshall, H. Reiterer, K. Wolf, J. Meyer, T. Schiphorst, D. Wang, and P. Maes. 2020. Next steps for human–computer integration. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 1–15. DOI:

Digital Library

[146]

F. Mueller, J. Marshall, R. A. Khot, S. Nylander, and J. Tholander. 2015. Understanding Sports-HCI by going jogging at CHI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 869–872. DOI:

Digital Library

[147]

F. Mueller, L. Matjeka, Y. Wang, J. Andres, Z. Li, J. Marquez et al. 2020. “Erfahrung & Erlebnis” Understanding the bodily play experience through german lexicon. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 337–347.

Digital Library

[148]

F. Mueller and S. J. Pell. 2016. Technology meets adventure: Learnings from an earthquake-interrupted Mt. everest expedition. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 817–828. DOI:

Digital Library

[149]

F. Mueller, M. G. Petersen, and Z. Li. 2023. Technology futures: Towards understanding how to design awe-inspiring futures. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 170 (2023), 102961.

Digital Library

[150]

F. Mueller, S. Stellmach, S. Greenberg, A. Dippon, S. Boll, J. Garner, R. Khot, A. Naseem, and D. Altimira. 2014. Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 533–542.

Digital Library

[151]

F. Mueller, C. Toprak, E. Graether, W. Walmink, B. Bongers, and E. v. d. Hoven. 2012. Hanging off a bar. In Proceedings of the CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1055–1058. DOI:

Digital Library

[152]

F. Mueller, F. Vetere, M. Gibbs, D. Edge, S. Agamanolis, and J. Sheridan. 2010. Jogging over a distance between Europe and Australia. UIST '10. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 189–198. DOI:

Digital Library

[153]

F. Mueller, F. Vetere, M. R. Gibbs, S. Agamanolis, and J. Sheridan. 2010. Jogging over a distance: the influence of design in parallel exertion games. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games. ACM, 63–68. DOI:

Digital Library

[154]

F. Mueller and D. Young. 2017. Five lenses for designing exertion experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2473–2487. DOI:

Digital Library

[155]

F. Mueller and D. Young. 2018. 10 Lenses to Design Sports-HCI. Foundations and Trends® Human–Computer Interaction 12, 3 (2018), 172–237.

Digital Library

[156]

F. F. Mueller and S. J. Pell. 2016. Adventure and technology: An earthquake-interrupted expedition to Mt. Everest. Interactions 24, 1 (2016), 58–62.

Digital Library

[157]

J. B. Nelson. 2017. Mindful eating: The art of presence while you eat. Diabetes Spectrum 30, 3 (2017), 171–174.

[158]

D. A. Norman. 1986. Cognitive engineering. User Centered System Design 31 (1986), 61.

[159]

S. Nyholm. 2018. Attributing agency to automated systems: Reflections on human–robot collaborations and responsibility-loci. Science and Engineering Ethics 24, 4 (2018), 1201–1219.

[160]

S. Nylander, J. Tholander, F. Mueller, and J. Marshall. 2014. HCI and sports. In Proceedings of the CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 115–118. DOI:

Digital Library

[161]

S. Nylander, J. Tholander, F. Mueller, and J. Marshall. 2015. HCI and sports. Interactions 22, 2 (2015), 30–31.

Digital Library

[162]

M. Page and A. V. Moere. 2007. Evaluating a wearable display jersey for augmenting team sports awareness. Pervasive Computing. Springer, 91–108.

[163]

R. Patibanda, X. Li, Y. Chen, A. Saini, C. N. Hill, E. van den Hoven, and F. F. Mueller. 2021. Actuating myself: Designing hand-games incorporating electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play. 228–235.

Digital Library

[164]

M. Pfeiffer, T. Dunte, S. Schneegass, F. Alt, and M. Rohs. 2015. Cruise control for pedestrians: Controlling walking direction using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2505–2514. DOI:

Digital Library

[165]

S. Pijnappel and F. Mueller. 2013. 4 Design themes for skateboarding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1271–1274. DOI:

Digital Library

[166]

S. Pijnappel and F. Mueller. 2014. Designing interactive technology for skateboarding. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 141–148. DOI:

Digital Library

[167]

C. Pinder, J. Vermeulen, B. R. Cowan, and R. Beale. 2018. Digital behaviour change interventions to break and form habits. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 25, 3 (2018), 1–66.

Digital Library

[168]

V. Pitron, A. Alsmith, and F. de Vignemont. 2018. How do the body schema and the body image interact? Consciousness and Cognition 65 (2018), 352–358.

[169]

V. Pitron and F. de Vignemont. 2017. Beyond differences between the body schema and the body image: insights from body hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition 53 (2017), 115–121.

[170]

H. Pohl and R. Murray-Smith. 2013. Focused and casual interactions: allowing users to vary their level of engagement. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2223--2232.

Digital Library

[171]

R. Raisamo, I. Rakkolainen, P. Majaranta, K. Salminen, J. Rantala, and A. Farooq. 2019. Human augmentation: Past, present and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 131 (2019), 131–143.

Digital Library

[172]

S. P. Rasheed, A. Younas, and A. Sundus. 2019. Self-awareness in nursing: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 28, 5-6 (2019), 762–774.

[173]

R. Rettie. 2003. Connectedness, awareness and social presence. In Proceedings of the Presence 2003, 6th Annual International Workshop on Presence.

[174]

R. B. Robinson, E. Reid, J. C. Fey, A. E. Depping, K. Isbister, and R. L. Mandryk. 2020. Designing and Evaluating ‘In the Same Boat’, A Game of Embodied Synchronization for Enhancing Social Play. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[175]

S. Robla-Gómez, V. M. Becerra, J. R. Llata, E. Gonzalez-Sarabia, C. Torre-Ferrero, and J. Perez-Oria. 2017. Working together: A review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access 5 (2017), 26754–26773.

[176]

D. Roden. 2010. Deconstruction and excision in philosophical posthumanism. The Journal of Evolution & Technology 21, 1 (2010), 27–36.

[177]

Y. Rogers, W. R. Hazlewood, P. Marshall, N. Dalton, and S. Hertrich. 2010. Ambient influence: Can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change? In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 261–270.

Digital Library

[178]

M. C. Rozendaal, B. Boon, and V. Kaptelinin. 2019. Objects with intent: Designing everyday things as collaborative partners. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 4 (2019), 1–33.

Digital Library

[179]

T. Schiphorst. 2009. Bridging Embodied Methodologies from Somatics and Performance to Human Computer Interaction, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.

[180]

A. Schmidt. 2017. Augmenting human intellect and amplifying perception and cognition. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (2017), 6–10.

Digital Library

[181]

E. M. Segura, A. Waern, J. Moen, and C. Johansson. 2013. The design space of body games: Technological, physical, and social design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3365–3374. DOI:

Digital Library

[182]

N. Semertzidis, M. Scary, J. Andres, B. Dwivedi, Y. C. Kulwe, F. Zambetta, and F. F. Mueller. 2020. Neo-noumena: Augmenting emotion communication. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[183]

B. Serim and G. Jacucci. 2019. Explicating “Implicit Interaction” An examination of the concept and challenges for research. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–16.

Digital Library

[184]

J. Shah and C. Breazeal. 2010. An empirical analysis of team coordination behaviors and action planning with application to human–robot teaming. Human Factors 52, 2 (2010), 234–245.

[185]

J. Slatman. 2016. Our Strange Body: Philosophical Reflections on Identity and Medical Interventions. Amsterdam University Press.

[186]

B. Spiegel. 2019. The Upper Half of the Motorcycle: On the Unity of Rider and Machine. Motorbooks.

[187]

Stelarc. 2020. Stelarc. Retrieved from http://stelarc.org.

[188]

Y. Strengers, J. Sadowski, Z. Li, A. Shimshak, and F. Mueller. 2021. What can HCI learn from sexual consent? A feminist process of embodied consent for interactions with emerging technologies. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13.

Digital Library

[189]

D. Svanaes and M. Solheim. 2016. Wag your tail and flap your ears: The kinesthetic user experience of extending your body. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3778–3779. DOI:

Digital Library

[190]

A. Tabrez, M. B. Luebbers, and B. Hayes. 2020. A survey of mental modeling techniques in human–robot teaming. Current Robotics Reports 1, 4 (2020), 259–267.

[191]

A. Tajadura-Jiménez, M. Basia, O. Deroy, M. Fairhurst, N. Marquardt, and N. Bianchi-Berthouze. 2015. As light as your footsteps: Altering walking sounds to change perceived body weight, emotional state and gait. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2943–2952.

Digital Library

[192]

J. K. Thompson. 2004. Handbook of Eating Disorders and Obesity. Wiley, New York.

[193]

D. T. Van Bel, K. Smolders, W. A. IJsselsteijn, and Y. de Kort. 2009. Social connectedness: concept and measurement. Intelligent Environments 2 (2009), 67–74.

[194]

N. van Berkel, M. B. Skov, and J. Kjeldskov. 2021. Human-AI interaction: Intermittent, continuous, and proactive. Interactions 28, 6 (2021), 67–71.

Digital Library

[195]

Vanmoof. 2020. Vanmoof. Retrieved from https://www.vanmoof.com/.

[196]

R. Velt, S. Benford, and S. Reeves. 2017. A survey of the trajectories conceptual framework: investigating theory use in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2091–2105.

Digital Library

[197]

R. Wakkary, A. Desjardins, and S. Hauser. 2016. Unselfconscious interaction: A conceptual construct. Interacting with Computers 28, 4 (2016), 501–520.

[198]

W. Walmink, A. Chatham, and F. Mueller. 2013. Lumahelm: an interactive helmet. In Proceedings of the CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2847–2848.

[199]

W. Walmink, D. Wilde, and F. Mueller. 2013. Displaying heart rate data on a bicycle helmet to support social exertion experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 97–104. DOI:

Digital Library

[200]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. Jarvis, R. Khot, and F. Mueller. 2019. iScream! CHI PLAY. ACM, 1–4.

[201]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. Jarvis, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2018. The singing carrot: Designing playful experiences with food sounds. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts. ACM, 669–676. DOI:

Digital Library

[202]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. Jarvis, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2019. iScream!: Towards the design of playful gustosonic experiences with ice cream. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–4. DOI:

Digital Library

[203]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. Jarvis, A. Russo, R. Khot, and F. Mueller. 2019a. Towards understanding the design of playful gustosonic experiences with ice cream. CHI PLAY. ACM, 12. DOI:

Digital Library

[204]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. S. Jarvis, J. La Delfa, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2020. WeScream! Toward Understanding the Design of Playful Social Gustosonic Experiences with Ice Cream.

[205]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. S. Jarvis, A. Russo, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2019b. Towards understanding the design of playful gustosonic experiences with ice cream. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer–Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 239–251. DOI:

Digital Library

[206]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2021. Sonic Straws: A beverage-based playful gustosonic system. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers 2021. 81--82.

[207]

Y. Wang, Z. Li, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2022. Toward understanding playful beverage-based gustosonic experiences. In Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (2022), 1–23.

Digital Library

[208]

Y. Wang, X. Zhang, Z. Li, R. A. Khot, and F. F. Mueller. 2020. Towards a framework for designing playful gustosonic experiences. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9.

Digital Library

[209]

K. J. Warren. 1997. Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature. Indiana University Press.

[210]

M. Weiser. 1993. Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 36, 7 (1993), 75–84.

Digital Library

[211]

M. Wiberg. 2018. The materiality of interaction: Notes on the Materials of Interaction Design. MIT press.

[212]

F. D. Wolf and R. Stock-Homburg. 2020. Human-Robot Teams: A Review. Springer.

[213]

H. Xu and S. M. Shatz. 2003. Adk: An agent development kit based on a formal design model for multi-agent systems. Automated Software Engineering 10, 4 (2003), 337–365.

Digital Library

[214]

J. Zimmerman, J. Forlizzi, and S. Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 493–502. DOI:

Digital Library

Cited By

Boot MUlak MGeurs KHavinga P(2024)Using body sensors for evaluating the impact of smart cycling technologies on cycling experiences: a systematic literature review and conceptual frameworkEuropean Transport Research Review10.1186/s12544-024-00635-316:1Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-024-00635-3
Lin ZHe WLiu XYe MLi XKan G(2024)The Framework of NAVIS: Navigating Virtual Spaces with Immersive ScootersProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3703381(448-450)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701571.3703381
Li XHe WJin SGugenheimer JHui PLiang HKristensson P(2024)Investigating Creation Perspectives and Icon Placement Preferences for On-Body Menus in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981368:ISS(236-254)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698136
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Toward Understanding the Design of Intertwined Human–Computer Integrations
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms

Recommendations

Towards an integrated methodological framework for understanding embodiment in HCI
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The third wave in HCI reveals how embodiment matters in post-WIMP computing systems. Yet it is still unclear what methods provide effective insight into the nature of embodiment in HCI in relation to both design and use. This paper presents work in ...
Human–Computer Integration: Towards Integrating the Human Body with the Computational Machine

Human-Computer Integration (HInt) is an emerging new paradigm in the human-computer interaction (HCI) field. Its goal is to integrate the human body and the computational machine. This monograph presents two key dimensions of Human-Computer Integration (...
Moving beyond the mirror: relational and performative meaning making in human–robot communication
Abstract
Current research in human–robot interaction often focuses on rendering communication between humans and robots more ‘natural’ by designing machines that appear and behave humanlike. Communication, in this human-centric approach, is often ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 30, Issue 5

October 2023

593 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/3623487

Editors:
Kristina Höök
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
,
Kasper Hornbæk
University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 September 2023

Online AM: 05 April 2023

Accepted: 20 November 2022

Revised: 27 September 2022

Received: 20 May 2021

Published in TOCHI Volume 30, Issue 5

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Australian Research Council

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

12
Total Citations
View Citations
1,262
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)766
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)72

Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Boot MUlak MGeurs KHavinga P(2024)Using body sensors for evaluating the impact of smart cycling technologies on cycling experiences: a systematic literature review and conceptual frameworkEuropean Transport Research Review10.1186/s12544-024-00635-316:1Online publication date: 14-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-024-00635-3
Lin ZHe WLiu XYe MLi XKan G(2024)The Framework of NAVIS: Navigating Virtual Spaces with Immersive ScootersProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3703381(448-450)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701571.3703381
Li XHe WJin SGugenheimer JHui PLiang HKristensson P(2024)Investigating Creation Perspectives and Icon Placement Preferences for On-Body Menus in Virtual RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981368:ISS(236-254)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698136
Patibanda ROverdevest NSaini ALi ZAndres JKnibbe Jvan den Hoven EMueller F(2024)Exploring Shared Bodily Control: Designing Augmented Human Systems for Intra- and Inter-CorporealityProceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 202410.1145/3652920.3653037(318-323)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652920.3653037
Li XWang JDudley JKristensson P(2024)Swarm manipulation: An efficient and accurate technique for multi-object manipulation in virtual realityComputers & Graphics10.1016/j.cag.2024.104113125(104113)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.104113
Gao ZLi XLiu CWang XWang AYang LWang YHui PBraud T(2023)VR PreM+: An Immersive Pre-learning Branching Visualization System for Museum ToursProceedings of the Eleventh International Symposium of Chinese CHI10.1145/3629606.3629643(374-385)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3629606.3629643
Patibanda RHill CSaini ALi XChen YMatviienko AKnibbe Jvan den Hoven EMueller F(2023)Auto-Paizo Games: Towards Understanding the Design of Games That Aim to Unify a Player’s Physical Body and the Virtual WorldProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110547:CHI PLAY(893-918)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611054
Patibanda RSaini AOverdevest NMontoya MLi XChen YNisal SAndres JKnibbe Jvan den Hoven EMueller F(2023)Fused Spectatorship: Designing Bodily Experiences Where Spectators Become PlayersProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36110497:CHI PLAY(769-802)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3611049
Li XChen YTang X(2023)GesMessages: Using Mid-air Gestures to Manage NotificationsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3618023(1-2)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3607822.3618023
He WChen YXu SDing CLee LKan G(2023)Dragon Boat Simulation: An Immersive Experience Beyond Traditional GamingProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3618022(1-2)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3607822.3618022
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents