[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3573381.3596472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

ICAMUS: Evaluation Criteria of an Interactive Multisensory Authoring Tool

Published: 29 August 2023 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents the advancement of the PRIM project that aims at giving the power to non-computer experts to create digital and interactive scenarios. For this purpose, we explored the strengths and limitations of the visual programming languages and the mulsemedia editors chosen for their ease of use. Results led to a criteria list that our final solution should meet, named the ICAMUS criteria for Interface, Combinatorics, Affordance, Modularity, Ubiquity, and Synoptic. This paper proposes a scale based on the ICAMUS criteria that may assess the Interactive and Multisensory Authoring Tools (IMAT scale). Last, this paper discusses how to compute a score based on three metrics (presence/absence of elements, number of clicks to do an action, and time needed to do this action) and the visual representation of this score that has to give a complete profile of the tool. We hypothesize that this scale will be able to highlight the complementarities of visual programming languages and mulsemedia editors as well as the challenges to face.

References

[1]
C. Jost, “PRIM Project: Playing and Recording with Interactivity and Multisensoriality,” in IMX 2021: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, 2021.
[2]
D. J. Malan, H. H. Leitner, D. J. Malan, and H. H. Leitner, “Scratch for budding computer scientists,” in Proceedinds of the 38th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE ’07, 2007, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 223.
[3]
J. Maloney, M. Resnick, N. Rusk, B. Silverman, and E. Eastmond, “The Scratch Programming Language and Environment,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–15, Nov. 2010.
[4]
N. Fraser, “Ten things we've learned from Blockly,” Proceedings - 2015 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop, Blocks and Beyond 2015, pp. 49–50, Dec. 2015.
[5]
E. Pasternak, R. Fenichel, and A. N. Marshall, “Tips for creating a block language with blockly,” Proceedings - 2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop, B and B 2017, vol. 2017-November, pp. 21–24, Nov. 2017.
[6]
C. C. Selby and J. Woollard, “Computational Thinking: The Developing Definition,” in 18th annual conference on innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Canterbury., 2013.
[7]
E. Coronado, F. Mastrogiovanni, B. Indurkhya, and G. Venture, “Visual Programming Environments for End-User Development of intelligent and social robots, a systematic review,” J Comput Lang, vol. 58, p. 100970, Jun. 2020.
[8]
N. Liu, “Visual languages for event integration specification,” in Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering, 2006, vol. 2006, pp. 969–972.
[9]
M. N. Ayub, S. T. Venugopal, and N. F. M. Nor, “Development of Multimedia Authoring Tool for Educational Material Disseminations,” Informatics in Education - An International Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–18, 2005.
[10]
M. Khademi, M. Haghshenas, and H. Kabir, “A review on authoring tools,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Learning and Education, IPCSIT, 2011, pp. 40–44.
[11]
A. Gordillo, E. Barra, and J. Quemada, “An easy to use open source authoring tool to create effective and reusable learning objects,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 188–199, Mar. 2017.
[12]
C. Y. Quah and K. H. Ng, “A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Storytelling Authoring Tool in Education: January 2010 to January 2020,” https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1972608, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 851–867, 2021.
[13]
H. Coelho, P. Monteiro, G. Gonçalves, M. Melo, and M. Bessa, “Authoring tools for virtual reality experiences: a systematic review,” Multimed Tools Appl, vol. 81, no. 19, pp. 28037–28060, Aug. 2022.
[14]
D. P. De Mattos, C. Muchaluat-Saade, Débora, and G. Ghinea, “Beyond Multimedia Authoring: On the Need for Mulsemedia Authoring Tools,” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, no. 7, Jul. 2021.
[15]
D. P. De Mattos and D. C. Muchaluat-Saade, “Steve: A hypermedia authoring tool based on the simple interactive multimedia model,” Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2018, DocEng 2018, Aug. 2018.
[16]
G. Ghinea, C. Timmerer, W. Lin, and S. R. Gulliver, “Mulsemedia: State of the Art, Perspectives, and Challenges,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, vol. 11, no. 1s, pp. 1–23, Sep. 2014.
[17]
E. B. Saleme, C. A. S. Santos, and G. Ghinea, “Coping With the Challenges of Delivering Multiple Sensorial Media,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 66–75, 2019.
[18]
A. Covaci, L. Zou, I. Tal, G.-M. Muntean, and G. Ghinea, “Is Multimedia Multisensorial? - A Review of Mulsemedia Systems,” ACM Comput Surv, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1–35, 2018.
[19]
M. Josué, “Modeling sensory effects as first-class entities in multimedia applications,” in Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference on - MMSys ’18, 2018, pp. 225–236.
[20]
C. Jost, B. Le Pévédic, and G. Uzan, “Using Multisensory Technologies to Stimulate People: a Reflexive Paper on Scenagrams,” in SensoryX ’21: Workshop on Multisensory Experiences, together with IMX 2021: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, 2021.
[21]
C. Jost, B. Le Pévédic, J. Debloos, and G. Uzan, “Interactions in Multisensory Experiences: Toward a New Timeline Metaphor,” in SensoryX ’22: Workshop on Multisensory Experiences, together with IMX 2022: ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences, 2022, p. 8.
[22]
J. Debloos, C. Jost, C. Le Pévédic, and U. Gérard, “Création de scénagramme: critères d'un logiciel « idéal » utilisable par des non informaticiens,” in JCJC 2021 – Colloque Jeunes Chercheuses Jeunes Chercheurs, 2021.
[23]
P. Markopoulos, I. Mavrommati, and A. Kameas, “End-user configuration of ambient intelligence environments: Feasibility from a user perspective,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 3295, pp. 243–254, 2004.
[24]
S. Kartakis and C. Stephanidis, “A design-and-play approach to accessible user interface development in Ambient Intelligence environments,” Comput Ind, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 318–328, May 2010.
[25]
K. Howland and J. Good, “Learning to communicate computationally with {Flip}: {A} bi-modal programming language for game creation,” Comput Educ, vol. 80, pp. 224–240, 2015.
[26]
Y. Sulema, “Mulsemedia vs. Multimedia: State of the art and future trends,” in 2016 International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing (IWSSIP), May 2016, pp. 1–5.
[27]
L. Jalal and M. Murroni, “Enhancing TV broadcasting services: A survey on mulsemedia quality of experience,” in 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), Jun. 2017, pp. 1–7.
[28]
G. Wang, P. R. Cook, and others, “ChucK: A concurrent, on-the-fly, audio programming language,” in ICMC, 2003.
[29]
F. Turbak, M. Sherman, F. Martin, D. Wolber, and S. C. Pokress, “Events-first programming in APP inventor,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 81–89, 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Programming Learning Difficulties: How Can Naive Users Create Human-Machine Interaction Scenarios?Computers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_30(241-248)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IMX '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
June 2023
465 pages
ISBN:9798400700286
DOI:10.1145/3573381
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 August 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ICAMUS criteria
  2. assessment criteria
  3. editing software
  4. multisensory interaction
  5. scenagram

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

IMX '23

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 245 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

IMX '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Programming Learning Difficulties: How Can Naive Users Create Human-Machine Interaction Scenarios?Computers Helping People with Special Needs10.1007/978-3-031-62849-8_30(241-248)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media