Gabrielsson et al., 1988 - Google Patents
The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibilityGabrielsson et al., 1988
- Document ID
- 12294952959420370432
- Author
- Gabrielsson A
- Schenkman B
- Hagerman B
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
External Links
Snippet
Four speech programs and two music programs were reproduced using five different frequency responses: one flat and the others combinations of reductions at lower frequencies and/or increases at higher frequencies. Twelve hearing impaired (HI) and 8 …
- 230000004044 response 0 title abstract description 50
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/30—Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Gabrielsson et al. | The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility | |
Divenyi et al. | Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly | |
Sperry et al. | Word recognition performance in various background competitors | |
Humes et al. | Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: The contributions of audibility | |
Divenyi et al. | Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects | |
Carroll et al. | Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing | |
Helfer et al. | Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise | |
Cox et al. | Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: Application to hearing aid selection | |
Bode et al. | Auditory training and speech discrimination | |
Needleman et al. | Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners | |
Baltzell et al. | Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss | |
Faucette et al. | Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise | |
Jerger et al. | Pediatric speech intelligibility test. II. Effect of receptive language age and chronological age | |
PUNCH | Quality judgments of hearing aid-processed speech and music by normal and otopathologic listeners | |
Liu et al. | Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners | |
Tecca et al. | Effect of low-frequency hearing aid response on four measures of speech perception | |
Narendran et al. | Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers | |
Narne et al. | The effect of recreational noise exposure on amplitude-modulation detection, hearing sensitivity at frequencies above 8 kHz, and perception of speech in noise | |
Gilbert et al. | Effect of compression on musical sound quality in cochlear implant users | |
Nábělek et al. | Vowel boundaries for steady‐state and linear formant trajectories | |
Arlinger et al. | Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing | |
Han et al. | Substitution patterns of phoneme errors in hearing aid and cochlear implant users | |
JUDGMENTS | THE EFFECTS OF DI FFERENT FREQUENCY RES p () N gpgy; SOUND QUALITY JUDGMENTS AND SPEECH I NTL. dfi | |
Náblek | Discriminability of the quality of amplitude-compressed speech | |
Flores et al. | A comparison of psychometric performance on four modified Spanish word recognition tests |