JUDGMENTS, 1988 - Google Patents
THE EFFECTS OF DI FFERENT FREQUENCY RES p () N gpgy; SOUND QUALITY JUDGMENTS AND SPEECH I NTL. dfiJUDGMENTS, 1988
View PDF- Document ID
- 16643374297625713626
- Author
- JUDGMENTS S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
External Links
Snippet
Four speech programs and two music programs were reproduced using five diferent frequeney responses: one flat and the others conbinations of reductions at lower frequencies andor increases at higher frequencie" ref hearing impaired (H1) and 3 normal …
- 230000000694 effects 0 title description 16
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Gabrielsson et al. | The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility | |
| Divenyi et al. | Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly | |
| Neuman et al. | The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality | |
| Preminger et al. | Quantifying the relation between speech quality and speech intelligibility | |
| Cox et al. | Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: Application to hearing aid selection | |
| Yost | Spatial release from masking based on binaural processing for up to six maskers | |
| Rennies et al. | Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort | |
| Nakatani et al. | A sensitive test of speech communication quality | |
| Choi | Acoustical measurements of masks and the effects on the speech intelligibility in university classrooms | |
| Keidser et al. | Candidates for multiple frequency response characteristics | |
| Baltzell et al. | Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss | |
| Kubiak et al. | Prediction of individual speech recognition performance in complex listening conditions | |
| Yund et al. | Discrimination of multichannel-compressed speech in noise: long-term learning in hearing-impaired subjects | |
| Punch et al. | Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids | |
| Tecca et al. | Effect of low-frequency hearing aid response on four measures of speech perception | |
| Gould et al. | Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation | |
| Narendran et al. | Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers | |
| Preminger et al. | An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure | |
| Gray et al. | Ability of hearing-impaired listeners to understand connected discourse | |
| Plyler et al. | Comparison of multichannel wide dynamic range compression and ChannelFree processing in open canal hearing instruments | |
| Nábělek et al. | Vowel boundaries for steady‐state and linear formant trajectories | |
| JUDGMENTS | THE EFFECTS OF DI FFERENT FREQUENCY RES p () N gpgy; SOUND QUALITY JUDGMENTS AND SPEECH I NTL. dfi | |
| Murphy et al. | A comparison of higher order auditory processes in younger and older adults. | |
| Narne et al. | The effect of recreational noise exposure on amplitude-modulation detection, hearing sensitivity at frequencies above 8 kHz, and perception of speech in noise | |
| Sebkova et al. | Evaluation of binaural hearing aids in children using localization and speech intelligibility tasks |