[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Náblek, 1984 - Google Patents

Discriminability of the quality of amplitude-compressed speech

Náblek, 1984

Document ID
11531470161901384519
Author
Náblek I
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

External Links

Snippet

In an earlier experiment on intelligibility of amplitude-compressed speech, subjects could not hear a difference between noncompressed speech and speech under some conditions of compression. Therefore, compression conditions were determined in which the quality of …
Continue reading at pubs.asha.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/75—Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Moore et al. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech
Picheny et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech
Ching et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification
Studebaker et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels
Souza et al. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss
Gabrielsson et al. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility
Vickers et al. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies
Fabry et al. Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition
Byrne Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing‐impaired listeners
Walker et al. The effects of multichannel compression/expansion amplification on the intelligibility of nonsense syllables in noise
Cox et al. Intelligibility ratings of continuous discourse: Application to hearing aid selection
Acton Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss
Danaher et al. Discrimination of formant frequency transitions in synthetic vowels
Punch et al. Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality
Needleman et al. Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners
Coughlin et al. The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners
Dirks et al. Binaural hearing of speech for aided and unaided conditions
Healy et al. Across-frequency comparison of temporal speech information by listeners with normal and impaired hearing
Velmans et al. The acceptability of spectrum-preserving and spectrum-destroying transposition to severely hearing-impaired listeners
Fikret‐Pasa The effect of compression ratio on speech intelligibility and quality
Findlay Auditory dysfunction accompanying noise-induced hearing loss
Náblek Discriminability of the quality of amplitude-compressed speech
Preminger et al. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure
Leijon et al. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses
MUELLER et al. The effects of various front-to-back ratios on the performance of directional microphone hearing aids