Faucette et al., 2017 - Google Patents
Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noiseFaucette et al., 2017
View HTML- Document ID
- 4256985004286314921
- Author
- Faucette S
- Stuart A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
External Links
Snippet
In this study, a release from masking (RFM) was sought with cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) elicited by speech (/da/) in competing continuous and interrupted noises. Two paradigms (ie, fixed speech with varying signal-to-noise ratios and fixed noise with …
- 230000000763 evoked 0 title abstract description 15
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
- A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
- A61B5/04845—Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6814—Head
- A61B5/6815—Ear
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0488—Electromyography
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hopkins et al. | The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise | |
| Vannson et al. | Quality of life and auditory performance in adults with asymmetric hearing loss | |
| Johnstone et al. | Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults | |
| Anderson et al. | Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues | |
| Hopkins et al. | Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech | |
| Misurelli et al. | Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity | |
| Saiz-Alía et al. | Individual differences in the attentional modulation of the human auditory brainstem response to speech inform on speech-in-noise deficits | |
| Schvartz et al. | Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners | |
| Horn et al. | Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners | |
| Easwar et al. | Evaluation of speech-evoked envelope following responses as an objective aided outcome measure: Effect of stimulus level, bandwidth, and amplification in adults with hearing loss | |
| Desloge et al. | Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: Effects of continuous and interrupted noise | |
| Jin et al. | Speech perception in gated noise: The effects of temporal resolution | |
| Faucette et al. | Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise | |
| Brännström et al. | Acceptable noise level with Danish, Swedish, and non-semantic speech materials | |
| Boothalingam et al. | Influence of the stimulus presentation rate on medial olivocochlear system assays | |
| Cabrera et al. | Development of temporal auditory processing in childhood: Changes in efficiency rather than temporal-modulation selectivity | |
| Whitmer et al. | Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals | |
| Kovačić et al. | Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees | |
| Billings et al. | Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials | |
| Stahl et al. | Rate discrimination at low pulse rates in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners: Influence of intracochlear stimulation site | |
| Baltzell et al. | Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss | |
| Smart et al. | Assessment of the efferent auditory system in children with suspected auditory processing disorder: the Middle ear muscle reflex and contralateral inhibition of OAEs | |
| Olsen et al. | Acceptable noise level: repeatability with Danish and non-semantic speech materials for adults with normal hearing | |
| Brännström et al. | The acceptable noise level: The effect of repeated measurements | |
| Schairer et al. | Wideband ipsilateral measurements of middle-ear muscle reflex thresholds in children and adults |