[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1028014.1028063acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A laboratory method for studying activity awareness

Published: 23 October 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Many failures in long-term collaboration occur because of a lack of activity awareness. Activity awareness is a broad concept that involves awareness of synchronous and asynchronous interactions over extended time periods. We describe a procedure to evaluate activity awareness and collaborative activities in a controlled setting. The activities used are modeled on real-world collaborations documented earlier in a field study. We developed an experimental method to study these activity awareness problems in the laboratory. Participants worked on a simulated long-term project in the laboratory over multiple experimental sessions with a confederate, who partially scripted activities and probes. We present evidence showing that this method represents a valid model of real collaboration, based on participants' active engagement, lively negotiation, and awareness difficulties. We found that having the ability to define, reproduce, and systematically manipulate collaborative situations allowed us to assess the effect of realistic conditions on activity awareness in remote collaboration.

References

[1]
Arrow H., McGrath, J. E. Berdahl, J. L., Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Co-ordination, Development, and Adaptation. Sage Publications, 2000.
[2]
Baker, K. Heuristic Evaluation of Shared Workspace Groupware based on the Mechanics of Collaboration. MSc Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 2002.
[3]
Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and discriminate validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 4, (1959), 297--312.
[4]
Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., and McCrickard, D. S. Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. Int., Journ. of Human-Computer Studies 58, (2003) 605--32.
[5]
Clark, H. H. Using Language. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[6]
Cockton, G., & Woolrych, A. Sale must end: Should discount methods be cleared off HCI's shelves?, interactions 9(5) (2002), 13--18.
[7]
Connolly, T., Jessup, L., & Valacich, J. S., "Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups," Management Science 36, (1990), 689--703.
[8]
Easterbrook, S. (ed.), CSCW: Co-operation or Conflict, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
[9]
Endsley, M. R., Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37, (1995), 32--64.
[10]
Flanagan, J. C. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin 51(4), (1954), 327--358.
[11]
Ganoe, C. H., Somervell, J. P., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., and McCrickard, D. S. Classroom BRIDGE: Using Collaborative Public and Desktop Timelines to Support Activity Awareness. Proc. of the ACM '03 Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM Press, (2003) 21--30.
[12]
Groove Networks Inc., http://www.Grove.com, 2003.
[13]
Grudin, J., Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces, Proc. CSCW'88, (1988), 85--93.
[14]
Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (2000). The Mechanics of Collaboration: Developing Low Cost Usability Evaluation Methods for Shared Workspaces. IEEE 9th Int'l Workshop WET-ICE'00 (2000).
[15]
Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. Workspace Awareness Position paper for the ACM CHI'97 workshop on Awareness in Collaborative Systems, organized by McDaniel S. E., & Brinck T., Atlanta, Georgia (1997).
[16]
Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S., Workspace awareness for groupware. Proc. CHI'96, ACM Press, (1996), 208--209.
[17]
Hayes-Roth, B. & Hayes-Roth, F. A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3, (1979), 275--310.
[18]
Kuutti, K. & Arvonen, T. Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of Activity Theory concepts: A case example. Proc. CSCW '92, ACM Press, (1992), 233--240.
[19]
McGrath, J. E., Methodology matters: Doing research in the behavioral and social sciences. In R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann, (1995), 152--169.
[20]
Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B., Team Mental Models: Expanding Theory and Measurement Through Cross-Disciplinary Boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 (2001), 89--106.
[21]
Neale, D. C., Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Evaluating Computer-Supported Co-operative Work: Models and Frameworks, Proc. CSCW '04, ACM Press, (2004) (to appear).
[22]
Neale, D. C., Carroll, J. M., 1999. Multi-faceted evaluation for complex, distributed activities. Proc. of the CSCL'99 Computer Supported Co-operative Learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, 425--433.
[23]
Pinelle, D., & Gutwin, C., Groupware walkthrough: Adding context to groupware usability evaluation. Proc. 2002, ACM Press, (2002) 455--462.
[24]
Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S., Task Analysis for Groupware Usability Evaluation: Modeling Shared-Workspace Tasks with the Mechanics of Collaboration, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10, (4) (2003), 281--311.
[25]
Prinz W., Mark G., Pankoke-Babatz P. (1998), Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use, Proc. CSCW'98, ACM Press, 373--382.
[26]
Ramage M., The Learning Way: Evaluating Co-operatives Systems, PhD thesis, Lancaster Univ., 1999.
[27]
Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D. P., & Shrestha, L., Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurements and training, Human Factors, 37 (1995), 123--136.
[28]
Scriven, M. The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, p. 39--83, 1967.
[29]
Steves, M., Morse, E., Gutwin, C., & Greengerg, S., A comparison of usage evaluation and inspection methods for assessing groupware usability. Proc. 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM Press (2001), 125--134.
[30]
Suchman, L. A. Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[31]
Twidale, M. Randal, D., Bentley, R. (1994), Situated Evaluation for Co-operative Systems. Proc. CSCW'94, ACM Press (1994), 22--26.
[32]
Watts, L., Monk, A., & Daly-Jones, O. Inter-Personal Awareness and Synchronization: Assessing the Value of Communication Technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44 (6), (1996), 849--873.
[33]
Weisband, S., Overcoming social awareness in computer-supported groups: Does anonymity really help?, Proc. CSCW'94 (2) (1994), 285--297.
[34]
Winograd, T., & Flores, F., Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)EPIC Collab: Supporting Asynchronous Collaboration in Big Data Analysis Systems2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA)10.1109/ICCCBDA51879.2021.9442495(17-26)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2021
  • (2018)Descriptive theory of awareness for groupware developmentJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-018-1165-910:12(4789-4818)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
  • (2016)A persuasive social actor for activity awareness in learning groupsProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.45(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NordiCHI '04: Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction
October 2004
472 pages
ISBN:1581138571
DOI:10.1145/1028014
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CSCW
  2. activity awareness
  3. awareness
  4. coordination

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

NordiCHI04
NordiCHI04: NordiCHI 2004
October 23 - 27, 2004
Tampere, Finland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)EPIC Collab: Supporting Asynchronous Collaboration in Big Data Analysis Systems2021 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA)10.1109/ICCCBDA51879.2021.9442495(17-26)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2021
  • (2018)Descriptive theory of awareness for groupware developmentJournal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing10.1007/s12652-018-1165-910:12(4789-4818)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2018
  • (2016)A persuasive social actor for activity awareness in learning groupsProceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion!10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.45(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Jul-2016
  • (2016)An Empirical Evaluation of an Activity-Based Infrastructure for Supporting Cooperation in Software Engineering2016 IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE)10.1109/ICGSE.2016.25(34-43)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • (2015)Assessing the awareness mechanisms of a collaborative programming support systemDYNA10.15446/dyna.v82n193.5349782:193(212-222)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2015
  • (2015)Studying Attraction Power in Proxemics-Based Visual Concepts for Large Public Interactive DisplaysProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces10.1145/2817721.2817749(93-102)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2015
  • (2015)The dBoardProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces10.1145/2817721.2817746(161-170)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2015
  • (2015)A laboratory-based study methodology to investigate attraction power of large public interactive displaysProceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing10.1145/2750858.2805842(1239-1250)Online publication date: 7-Sep-2015
  • (2014)Reviewing the quality of awareness support in collaborative applicationsJournal of Systems and Software10.5555/2747476.274752089:C(146-169)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2014
  • (2014)ActivitySpaceProceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces10.1145/2669485.2669493(119-128)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media