Before I present the historical SD/MD leaders, there are a couple things to keep in mind. First, Win Probability Added data are only available back to 1974. So, anybody pitching prior to that year will be excluded.
Another issue is that relievers were used a lot differently back in the 1970s and even into the 1980s. In contrast to today where closers typically enter games with nobody on base and pitch one inning, earlier top relievers would often come into games with runners on base and pitch multiple innings. So, earlier relievers had more opportunities for Meltdowns than contemporary relievers and thus typically didn't do as well on the SD/MD statistic.
Table 1 lists the Tigers SD/MD leaders since 1974. 1984 MVP winner Guillermo Hernandez tops the list with an amazing 10.2 (41/4) ratio. The second best ratio belongs to Jose Valverde with a 7.6 (38/5) ratio in 2011.
Table 1: Tigers Single-season SD/MD Leaders, 1974-2011
Pitcher | Year | SD | MD | SD/MD |
Guillermo Hernandez | 1984 | 41 | 4 | 10.2 |
Jose Valverde | 2011 | 38 | 5 | 7.6 |
Todd Jones | 2000 | 35 | 5 | 7.0 |
Mike Christopher | 1995 | 12 | 2 | 6.0 |
Fernando Rodney | 2009 | 35 | 7 | 5.0 |
Jose Valverde | 2010 | 23 | 5 | 4.6 |
Todd Jones | 1999 | 27 | 6 | 4.5 |
Aurelio Lopez | 1979 | 34 | 8 | 4.2 |
Jerry Don Gleaton | 1990 | 21 | 5 | 4.2 |
Todd Jones | 2007 | 29 | 7 | 4.1 |
Todd Jones | 1997 | 32 | 8 | 4.0 |
Joel Zumaya | 2006 | 35 | 9 | 3.9 |
Todd Jones | 1998 | 26 | 7 | 3.7 |
Mike Henneman | 1991 | 29 | 8 | 3.6 |
Jose Lima | 1996 | 14 | 4 | 3.5 |
Todd Jones had five of the top 15 seasons - 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2007. There are a couple of factors involved in Jones' success. First, the Roller Coaster was not used in a lot of situations where he had chances for Meltdowns. Just as importantly, he was very good at his role and therefore was able to get a good number of Shutdowns.
The biggest surprises on the list are Mike Christopher in 1995 and Jose Lima in 1996. Neither was very good according to traditional statistics, but a look at their game logs shows that they pitched well in high leverage situations. It's probably just a fluke that they pitched their best when they were needed the most, but their good SD/MD ratios indicate that they probably had more value to their teams than the more traditional measures indicate.