JPH1067590A - Material for growing plant - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain a material for growing plant, containing one or more kinds of components selected form a humic acid source, a useful microorganism and a carbonized cattle excrement, having a high plant growing effect and aiming at the effective utilization of the carbonized cattle excrement. SOLUTION: This material for growing plant is obtained by containing one or more kinds of components selected from a humic acid source, a useful microorganism and a carbonized cattle excrement. As necessary, it is preferable to contain further a fertilizer especially an inorganic fertilizer therein. It is preferable to have component ratios such as (1) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement and 1-70 pts.wt. humic acid, (2) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement and 10-230 pts.wt. microorganism, (3) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement, 1-200 pts.wt. humic acid and 12-300 pts.wt. microorganisms, (4) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement 1-200 pts.wt. humic acid, and 1-350 pts.wt. fertilizer, (5) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement, 12-350 pts.wt. microorganism and 12-350 pts.wt. fertilizer and (6) 100 pts.wt. carbonized cattle excrement, 1-200 pts.wt. humic acid. 12-300 pts.wt. microorganism and 6-300 pts.wt. fertilizer.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

The present invention relates to a novel plant growing material containing livestock dung charcoal and a plant growing fertilizer containing the material and a fertilizer.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Livestock manure is fermented and used as an organic fertilizer and compost in the agricultural field. However, since it emits a strong odor and is disposed of in large quantities, it is difficult to dispose of it only in the agricultural field. Is coming. Therefore, in recent years, in order to reduce the amount of livestock dung to be discarded, a carbonization method has been adopted. Livestock manure, for example, chicken manure, is a carbonized industrial waste that is used to treat strong foul-smelling chicken manure, which is discarded in large quantities from poultry farms. It is.

[0003] In recent years, livestock dung charcoal has different properties from ordinary charcoal, contains fertilizer components, has relatively stable quality, and does not contain harmful substances such as heavy metals. Is now available. Chicken manure has become available as a raw material for special fertilizers and compound fertilizers following the revision of the official standards in 1994. However, although chicken manure is already known to have some plant growth effects by itself, on the other hand, the fertilizer components contained in chicken manure are difficult to be absorbed by plants, and the utilization rate of plants is low. It is also known to be extremely low. As described above, the utilization of chicken manure is limited to a limited area and limited to a part of the region, because the effect of plant growth is not sufficient with chicken manure alone.
At present, it is not widely used nationwide. In addition, due to the problem of manufacturing cost, it is strongly required to provide added value and to open a way for effective use.

[0004] On the other hand, conventional charcoal (charcoal) is generally porous, and has good air permeability and water retention. Therefore, it is designated as a soil improvement material by the soil strength improvement method, and is effective in improving soil permeability. It has been. It is also said that the application of charcoal increases the infection rate of VA mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia to symbiotic plants, and improves plant nutrient absorption, thereby promoting plant growth. In recent years, the use of charcoal in agricultural settings has been promoted, and it has become known to promote the growth of plants by applying it in combination with various materials, but the effect is small. The cost is high and the use in the agricultural field is
Limited to some areas only.

[0005]

Therefore, since the effect of plant growth is not sufficient with livestock manure only, there is a demand for the development of a material that has a remarkable plant growth effect and can be used in a wide range. That is, the present invention provides livestock dung charcoal,
The purpose is to develop agricultural materials containing chicken manure and having a high plant growth effect, to expand the use of chicken manure in agricultural situations, and to make effective use of chicken manure.

[0006]

Means for Solving the Problems As a result of diligent studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, a material containing a specific component in livestock dung charcoal is particularly effective for the growth of plants, and a normal material is used for the material. It has been found that fertilizers have a remarkable effect on plant growth.

That is, the present invention relates to [1] a plant growth material comprising one or more components selected from humic acid sources and useful microorganisms and livestock dung charcoal, and [2] the above [ [1] The material for plant growth according to [1] or the material for plant growth according to [2] above, wherein the livestock dung is charcoal of chicken dung. [4] The material for plant growth according to [1], wherein the useful microorganism is mycorrhizal fungi, or the fertilizer for plant growth according to [2], wherein [5] livestock dung charcoal is used. The above [1], which is chicken dung charcoal and the useful microorganism is mycorrhizal fungus
It relates to the material for plant growth described in the above or the fertilizer for plant growth described in the above [2].

[0008]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION In the present invention, livestock dung charcoal is obtained by carbonizing livestock dung such as chicken dung, cow dung, and pig dung and converting it into charcoal. Useful microorganisms include
Plant pathogenic microorganisms (bacteria, actinomycetes, filamentous fungi), rhizobia, mycorrhizal fungi and the like.

[0009] As the bacteria of the phytopathogenic antagonistic microorganisms, Ba
cillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Rhizobium sp., Azos
pirillum sp. (Azotobacter sp.), Azotobacter sp.
(Assorter S-Ph), Serratia sp.
Streptomyces sp. (Streptomyces sp.) As an actinomycete, and Trichoderm sp. (Trichoderma sp.) As a filamentous fungus
Espie, Fusarium sp., Gliocladiu
m sp. (Cryocratium sp.) and the like. In the mycorrhizal fungi, the VA mycorrhizal fungi include Gigaspora margarita (Carcassola marcarita) and Gigaspora macrocarpa (Carcassola)
Macrocalha), Gigaspora gregaria (Carcasphora qualearia), Glomus mosseae (Glomus moseaae), Glomus fascicu
latum (Kuromus fasicaratam), Acaulospora ep. (Acaulospora espae), Sclerocystis ep (Sclerocystis espae),
Ectomycorrhizal fungi Ximeji (Tricholoma flavovireus (PRES.EX)
FR) LUNDELL. (L) FR.), Shoro (Rhizopogon rubesc)
ens TUL), mushrooms (Lactarius Hatsudate) and the like. Especially the VA mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora margarit
a, Gigaspora macrocarpa, Gigaspora gregaria, Glomu
s mosseae, Glomus fasciculatum, Acaulospora sp., S
clerocystis sp. is preferred.

The source of humic acid is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include nitrohumic acid, humic acid, peat containing humic acid, and humic acid fertilizer.

The fertilizer is not particularly limited, but is preferably an inorganic fertilizer, such as ammonium sulfate, urea, potassium chloride, phosphorous and Chiyoda Chemical Fertilizer (trade name of Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd.).

The crop to be applied is not particularly limited, and can be applied to all crops. Examples include vegetables (tomato, eggplant, cucumber, etc.), rice and the like.

The composition of the plant growth material of the present invention may contain an inert carrier such as zeolite, vermiculite, perlite, bentonite, clay mineral, diatomaceous earth, etc. in addition to the above-mentioned components. Good.

Further, it can be granulated and applied for convenience of use, and may contain an auxiliary agent, a surfactant and the like used in the production.

In the case of the above [1], the composition ratio of the plant-growing material of the present invention is as follows. preferable. In the combination of livestock manure and useful microorganisms, microbial material is 10 to 23 parts per 100 parts by weight of livestock manure.
0 parts by weight is preferred. However, as for useful microorganisms, it is preferable that the phytopathogenic antagonistic microorganisms and rhizobia are contained in an amount of 10 ⁴ cfu or more per 1 g of the material of the present invention. The VA mycorrhizal fungi preferably contain 5 to 1000 spores per 1 g of the material of the present invention. Ectomycorrhizal fungi are 1 g of the material of the present invention.
Per desirably contains spores 10 ³ or more.

In the combination of livestock manure, useful microorganisms and humic acid, 100 parts by weight of livestock manure is humic acid 1 to 100 parts by weight.
200 parts by weight and 12 to 300 parts by weight of the microbial material are preferred. However, as for useful microorganisms, it is preferable that the phytopathogenic antagonistic microorganisms and rhizobia are contained in an amount of 10 ⁴ cfu or more per 1 g of the material of the present invention. VA mycorrhizal fungi are 1 weight g of the material of the present invention.
Per spore is desirable to contain 5 to 1000 spores. Ectomycorrhizal fungi, the invention material 1 wt g per desirably contains spores 10 ³ or more.

In the case of the above [2], the composition ratio of the fertilizer for plant growth of the present invention is as follows: in the case of the combination of livestock manure, humic acid and fertilizer, 1 to 20 parts by weight of humic acid per 100 parts by weight of livestock manure.
0 parts by weight and 1 to 350 parts by weight of fertilizer are preferred. In the case of livestock manure in combination with microorganisms and fertilizers,
12 to 350 parts by weight of microbial material and 12 to 3 parts of fertilizer
50 parts by weight are preferred. However, as for useful microorganisms, it is preferable that the phytopathogenic antagonistic microorganisms and rhizobia are contained in an amount of 10 ⁴ cfu or more per 1 g of the material of the present invention. The VA mycorrhizal fungi preferably contain 5 to 1000 spores per 1 g of the material of the present invention. Ectomycorrhizal fungi are 1 g of the material of the present invention.
Per desirably contains spores 10 ³ or more.

In the combination of livestock manure, humic acid, useful microorganisms and fertilizer, 100 parts by weight of livestock manure is
Humic acid 1-200 parts by weight, microorganism 12-300 parts by weight, fertilizer 6-30
0 parts by weight is preferred. However, as for useful microorganisms, it is preferable that the phytopathogenic antagonistic microorganisms and rhizobia are contained in an amount of 10 ⁴ cfu or more per 1 g of the material of the present invention. The VA mycorrhizal fungi preferably contain 5 to 1000 spores per 1 g of the material of the present invention. Ectomycorrhizal fungi are 1 g of the material of the present invention.
Per desirably contains spores 10 ³ or more.

The material for plant growth of the present invention containing no fertilizer has a low growth effect, but its effect is remarkable when at least one component selected from humic acids and microorganisms is used in combination with the fertilizer. When applied to plants, the plant growth material of the present invention containing no fertilizer and the fertilizer may be separately treated, or the plant growth material of the present invention containing a fertilizer may be directly treated. Further, a mixed material of the material and a mixed material of the material and the fertilizer may be granulated and used. The use form is properly used according to the use situation.

[0020]

Next, the present invention will be described with reference to specific examples and test examples. Parts in Examples and Test Examples mean parts by weight. However, the present invention is not limited only to these.

Example 1 Chicken manure charcoal (100 parts by weight) and humic acid (40 parts by weight) were uniformly mixed to prepare a plant growth material of the present invention.

Example 2 Chicken manure charcoal (100 parts by weight) and Serakincon (200 parts by weight) (trade name of Central Glass Co., Ltd.) were uniformly mixed to prepare a plant growth material of the present invention.

Example 3 Chicken manure charcoal (100 parts by weight), humic acid (40 parts by weight) and serakincon (200 parts by weight) were uniformly mixed to prepare a plant growth material of the present invention.

Example 4 Poultry manure charcoal (100 parts by weight), humic acid (40 parts by weight) and Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (28.56 parts by weight) were uniformly mixed to prepare a fertilizer for plant growth of the present invention. .

Example 5 Poultry manure charcoal (100 parts by weight), Serakincon (200 parts by weight) and Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (28.56 parts by weight) were uniformly mixed to prepare a fertilizer for plant growth of the present invention.

Example 6 Chicken manure charcoal (100 parts by weight), serakincon (200 parts by weight), humic acid (40 parts by weight), and Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (28.56 parts by weight) were uniformly mixed to obtain the present invention. A fertilizer for plant growth was prepared.

In the case of treating plants, Example 1
The material for uniformly growing the plant growth material of the present invention and the fertilizer of the present invention may be used, or the plant growth fertilizer of the present invention of Examples 4 to 6 may be used. Next, a specific test example will be described.

Test Example 1 Tomato Growth Test On February 19, three tomato seeds were sown in a 200 ml styrene cup. On March 11, 500 ml of dirt soil and a predetermined amount of a test sample described below were sufficiently mixed and filled into a 500-ml black polypot, and one of the grown tomatoes was transplanted into the pot and cultivated in a greenhouse. The test was performed in five consecutive sessions. April 16
The tomato growth status was investigated on the day. Table 1 shows the test results.

Test No. Test sample Test 1 Chicken manure (2.5 g) + humic acid (1 g) + Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2
(714mg) Test 2 Chicken manure charcoal (2.5g) + Serakincon (5g) + Chiyoda Kasei
4-7-2 (714mg) Test 3 Chicken manure charcoal (2.5g) + humic acid (1g) + Serakincon (5g)
+ Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (714mg) Comparative 1 Chicken manure (2.5g) + Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (714mg) Comparative 2 Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (714mg) Comparative 3 Charcoal (2.5g) + Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (714mg) Comparative 4 Charcoal (2.5g) + Humic acid (1g) + Chiyoda Kasei 4-7-2 (714m
g) Comparative 5 Charcoal (2.5g) + Serakincon (5g) + Chiyoda Kasei 4-7
-2 (714mg) Comparative 6 Charcoal (2.5g) + Humic acid (1g) + Serakincon (5g) + Chiyoda Chemical 4-7-2 (714mg)

[0030]

[Table 1] Table 1 Effect on tomato growth ──────────────────────────────────── Test No Plant height (cm) Leaf weight (g) Stem weight (g) Aboveground weight (g) Root weight (g) ──────────────────────── ──────────── Test 1 26.2 (111) 3.42 (128) 1.97 (137) 5.39 (131) 1.22 (114) Test 2 27.3 (116) 3.59 (134) 2.24 (156) 5.83 ( 142) 1.25 (117) Test 3 29.0 (123) 3.66 (137) 2.21 (153) 5.87 (143) 1.12 (105) Comparative 1 23.8 (101) 3.28 (123) 1.73 (120) 5.01 (122) 1.20 (112) Comparison 2 23.5 (100) 2.67 (100) 1.44 (100) 4.11 (100) 1.07 (100) Comparison 3 24.3 (103) 2.75 (103) 1.62 (113) 4.37 (106) 1.03 (96) Comparison 4 24.7 (105) 2.73 (102) 1.62 (113) 4.35 (106) 1.04 (97) Comparative 5 24.7 (105) 2.82 (106) 1.65 (115) 4.47 (109) 0.99 (93) Comparative 6 25.0 (106) 3.04 (114) 1.99 ( 138) 5.03 (122) 1.01 (93) 表 Table 1 The weight in the middle is the dry weight, and the value in parentheses is 10 for comparison 2.
Indicates the relative value when set to 0. As is clear from the results shown in Table 1, chicken manure and humic acid, chicken manure and Serakincon (V
A mycorrhizal fungi), the mixture of chicken manure with humic acid and Serakincon clearly increased plant growth significantly compared to the application of chicken manure alone. In addition, the comparison between the charcoal of the comparative example and the material combined with the charcoal and each material shows a remarkable difference in the growth amount, indicating that the effect of chicken manure charcoal is clearly superior to charcoal. This result indicates that the fertilizer effect is remarkably enhanced and contributes to reducing the burden on the environment.

Next, Table 2 shows the results of the superiority of the effects of chicken manure charcoal and charcoal on the absorption of phosphate by tomato. Analysis of Phosphoric Acid in Tomato In the tomato growth test of Test Example 1, leaves and stems of the tomato after the tomato growth status was investigated on April 16 were used.

The leaves and stems of the tomato were dried at 80 ° C. for 72 hours and then pulverized by a Wiley pulverizer. After grinding, 80 ℃,
The sample was dried for 48 hours to prepare a sample for phosphoric acid analysis. Sample about 500m
g in a Kjeldahl flask, 20 ml of an equal volume mixed decomposition solution of nitric acid and sulfuric acid was added, and the mixture was heated at 200 ° C. for 2 hours.
Decomposed for about 2 hours at 0 ° C (nitric acid-sulfuric acid method). Decompose liquid 200m
l and used for phosphoric acid analysis. The analysis of phosphoric acid was performed by a colorimetric method using a molybdenum sulfate method.

[0033]

[Table 2] Table 2 Effect of each material on phosphate absorption by tomato ──────────────────────────────── ──── Test No. Phosphorus content (%) Phosphorus content (mg) Leaf Stem Leaf Stem Above ground ───────────────────────── ─────────── Test 1 0.16 (133) 0.12 (86) 5.5 (172) 2.4 (120) 7.9 (152) Test 2 0.15 (125) 0.17 (121) 5.4 (169) 3.8 (190 ) 9.2 (177) Test 3 0.14 (117) 0.16 (114) 5.1 (159) 3.5 (175) 8.6 (165) Comparison 1 0.15 (125) 0.13 (93) 4.9 (153) 2.2 (110) 7.1 (137) Comparison 2 0.12 (100) 0.14 (100) 3.2 (100) 2.0 (100) 5.2 (100) Comparison 3 0.14 (117) 0.14 (100) 3.9 (122) 2.3 (115) 6.2 (119) Comparison 4 0.12 (100) 0.17 (121) 3.3 (103) 2.8 (140) 6.1 (117) Comparative 5 0.17 (142) 0.16 (114) 4.8 (150) 2.6 (130) 7.4 (142) Comparative 6 0.14 (117) 0.16 (114) 4.3 (134) ) 3.2 (160) 7.5 (144) ──────────────────────────────── ─── values in parentheses indicate relative values when the comparison No.2 and 100. As shown in Table 2, with respect to the effect on phosphate absorption of tomato, chicken manure clearly showed a remarkable phosphate absorption effect as compared with charcoal, indicating that it was an excellent material. At the same time, he showed that it is an environmentally friendly material with improved fertilizer use efficiency.

As described above, it has been clarified that one or more components selected from humic acid and serakincon and a material containing chicken manure charcoal significantly improve plant growth.

[0035]

Industrial Applicability The material for plant growth of the present invention remarkably enhances fertilizer efficiency, is a material having a good plant growth effect as compared with the application of fertilizer alone, and greatly reduces the load on the environment of the fertilizer.

Claims (5)

[Claims] 1. A plant growing material comprising one or more components selected from a humic acid source and a useful microorganism, and livestock dung charcoal. 2. A plant growing fertilizer comprising the plant growing material according to claim 1 and a fertilizer. 3. The plant growing material according to claim 1, wherein the livestock manure is chicken manure, or the plant growing fertilizer according to claim 2. 4. The material for plant growth according to claim 1, wherein the useful microorganism is a mycorrhizal fungus, or the fertilizer for plant growth according to claim 2. 5. The plant growth material according to claim 1, wherein the livestock dung charcoal is chicken dung charcoal, and the useful microorganism is mycorrhizal fungus.