[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/jmmr311.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Incivility in Hybrid Workplaces: Setting agenda for future research

Author

Listed:
  • Suruchi Pandey

    (Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), India Author-2-Name: Mahima Singh Author-2-Workplace-Name: Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies, Pune, India Author-3-Name: Author-3-Workplace-Name: Sanjay Pandey Author-4-Name: Manager, Career Launcher, Pune, India Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract
" Purpose - Remote working is a common practice adopted by Industries post covid. Hybrid working is predicted as the future of work. A continuously growing body pertaining to the research areas explored incivility, which is defined as the aspect of low-intensity deviant workplace behaviors and intent to harm colleagues. In this paper, researchers aim to (i) analysing components and connections with both the incivility and negative social effect for physical and virtual workplaces. (ii) investigate how incivility in the workplace impacts the person's personal and professional life in physical and virtual workplaces. (iii) suggest organizational measures that support or increase the incidence of employment by mitigating incivility at the workplace, physical and virtual. Methodology - The study is done based on secondary research methodology as the existing literature is considered with the help of the internet and keywords, and relevant, accurate, and available information will be reviewed and mentioned in this paper. Findings - Close to the past two decades, some of the theoretical and conceptual introduction about workplace instability has always been constructive, and all the research in this domain has taken off in various directions. Much research has been carried out on workplace incivility; however, in this paper's discussion is directed toward incivility in remote working environments. Novelty - The authors concluded that hybrid workplaces are more sensitive and prone to incivility at the workplace. Therefore, leaders must be sensitive towards dealing with such issues while working in hybrid work culture. There is hardly any study in this area, and the impact of incivility in hybrid will be the focus of researchers in the coming few years. Type of Paper - Review"

Suggested Citation

  • Suruchi Pandey, 2023. "Incivility in Hybrid Workplaces: Setting agenda for future research," GATR Journals jmmr311, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr311
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2023.8.1(3)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/JMMR/pdf_files/JMMRVol8(1)2023/3.Suruchi%20Pandey.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35609/jmmr.2023.8.1(3)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Workplace Incivility; Remote Working; Negative Behaviors; Hybrid Workspace.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.