[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cauman/585.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams

Author

Listed:
  • Haberstroh, Martin
  • Wolf, Joachim
Abstract
Dass die Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams mit innovativen Aufgabenstellungen erfolgswirksam ist, wurde in bisherigen konzeptuellen und empirischen Arbeiten klar herausgearbeitet. Die selbständige Aufgabenerfüllung durch die einzelnen Teammitglieder als bedeutsamer Einflussfaktor auf den Erfolg von Projektteams wurde hingegen bisher kaum beachtet. Dies gilt auch für den hiermit zusammenhängenden Aspekt der individuellen Autonomie der Teammitglieder. Bisher besteht nur Kenntnis über Wirkungszusammenhänge zwischen der individuellen Autonomie in Teams und dem Teamerfolg, nicht jedoch, in welchen Projektsituationen eine hohe individuelle Autonomie auftritt. Somit wendet sich die vorliegende Untersuchung dem Zusammenhang zwischen der durchschnittlichen individuellen Autonomie und den Aufgabencharakteristika, der Führung, der Zusammenarbeit sowie der Teambesetzung in Projektteams zu. Zur Konzeptualisierung dieser Zusammenhänge wurde ein Bezugsrahmen zur Erklärung von individueller Autonomie in Teams aufgestellt und mit einer Stichprobe aus Projektteams mit der Aufgabenstellung Softwareentwicklung getestet. Insgesamt stehen 53 vollständige Projektteams aus 36 Unternehmen zur Überprüfung des Bezugsrahmens zur Verfügung. Als wichtige Einflussgrößen auf die individuelle Autonomie erwiesen sich die Teamgröße, die Aufgabenunsicherheit/Schwierigkeit der Teamaufgabe, die Fachkompetenz der Teammitglieder sowie die Dringlichkeit und die Wichtigkeit der Teamaufgabe. Diese Einflussgrößen erklären insgesamt 26% der Varianz. Bei größeren Teams, dringlicheren oder wichtigeren Teamaufgaben nimmt die individuelle Autonomie tendenziell ab. Bei schwierigen Teamaufgaben und Teammitgliedern mit hoher Fachkompetenz steigt die individuelle Autonomie hingegen tendenziell an. Abschließend werden die Implikationen für die Praxis und die Forschung dargelegt und es werden Maßnahmen zur Schaffung erfolgswirksamer Rahmenbedingungen für Projektteams mit hoher individueller Autonomie aufgezeigt.

Suggested Citation

  • Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/147645/1/manuskript_585.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sim B. Sitkin & Nancy L. Roth, 1993. "Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 367-392, August.
    2. Martin Hoegl & Hans Georg Gemuenden, 2001. "Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 435-449, August.
    3. Richard L. Daft & Robert H. Lengel, 1986. "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 554-571, May.
    4. Patricia J. Guinan & Jay G. Cooprider & Samer Faraj, 1998. "Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 101-125, June.
    5. Laurie S. Kirsch, 1997. "Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 215-239, September.
    6. Samer Faraj & Lee Sproull, 2000. "Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(12), pages 1554-1568, December.
    7. John C. Henderson & Soonchul Lee, 1992. "Managing I/S Design Teams: A Control Theories Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 757-777, June.
    8. Mary Beth Pinto & Jeffrey K. Pinto & John E. Prescott, 1993. "Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1281-1297, October.
    9. Raymond E. Levitt & Jan Thomsen & Tore R. Christiansen & John C. Kunz & Yan Jin & Clifford Nass, 1999. "Simulating Project Work Processes and Organizations: Toward a Micro-Contingency Theory of Organizational Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1479-1495, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoegl, Martin & Proserpio, Luigi, 2004. "Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1153-1165, October.
    2. Alan R. Dennis & Lionel P. Robert & Aaron M. Curtis & Stacy T. Kowalczyk & Bryan K. Hasty, 2012. "Research Note ---Trust Is in the Eye of the Beholder: A Vignette Study of Postevent Behavioral Controls' Effects on Individual Trust in Virtual Teams," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 546-558, June.
    3. Henrik Bresman, 2010. "External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 81-96, February.
    4. Rupak Rauniar & Greg Rawski & Donald Hudson, 2017. "Antecedents And Consequences Of Ippd Effectiveness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-38, October.
    5. Ambos, Tina C. & Ambos, Björn & Eich, Katharina J. & Puck, Jonas, 2016. "Imbalance and Isolation: How Team Configurations Affect Global Knowledge Sharing," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 316-332.
    6. Martin Hoegl & Katharina Weinkauf & Hans Georg Gemuenden, 2004. "Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 38-55, February.
    7. Jaime B. Windeler & Likoebe Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh, 2017. "Technical Systems Development Risk Factors: The Role of Empowering Leadership in Lowering Developers’ Stress," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 775-796, December.
    8. Anandasivam Gopal & Sanjay Gosain, 2010. "Research Note ---The Role of Organizational Controls and Boundary Spanning in Software Development Outsourcing: Implications for Project Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 960-982, December.
    9. Chris P. Long & Sim B. Sitkin & Laura B. Cardinal & Richard M. Burton, 2015. "How controls influence organizational information processing: insights from a computational modeling investigation," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 406-436, December.
    10. Natalia Levina, 2005. "Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 109-130, June.
    11. Hoegl, Martin & Gibbert, Michael & Mazursky, David, 2008. "Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 1382-1391, September.
    12. Hung, Yu Wen & Hsu, Shih-Chieh & Su, Zhi-Yuan & Huang, Hsieh-Hong, 2014. "Countering user risk in information system development projects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 533-545.
    13. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    14. Bart A. De Jong & Katinka M. Bijlsma-Frankema & Laura B. Cardinal, 2014. "Stronger Than the Sum of Its Parts? The Performance Implications of Peer Control Combinations in Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 1703-1721, December.
    15. Edoardo Mollona & Andrea Marcozzi, 2009. "FirmNet: the scope of firms and the allocation of task in a knowledge-based economy," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 109-126, June.
    16. Kyle Lewis, 2004. "Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(11), pages 1519-1533, November.
    17. Shoeb Ahmed Memon & Steve Rowlinson & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Hafiz Zahoor, 2021. "Collaborative Behavior in Relational Contracting Projects in Hong Kong—A Contractor’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Goh, Shao Hung & Eldridge, Stephen, 2019. "Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 80-94.
    19. Bremmers, Harry J. & Sabidussi, Anna, 2009. "Co-innovation: what are the success factors?," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 3(1-2), pages 1-8.
    20. Samer Faraj & Yan Xiao, 2006. "Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1155-1169, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.