[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rvr/journl/201511480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Croissance, inégalités et pauvreté au sein des pays émergents : le cas des BRICS

Author

Listed:
  • Porras, Laila
Abstract
Les cinq pays qui forment les BRICS (Brésil, Russie, Inde, Chine et Afrique du Sud) se singularisent, dans les années 2000, à la fois par une forte croissance économique – liée au processus de transformation économique et plus précisément d’ouverture commerciale et financière – ainsi que par une diminution de la pauvreté. Mais malgré ces évolutions communes, nous relevons une diversité des chemins concernant la dynamique croissance-inégalités au sein de ce groupe. Pour tous les pays à l’exception du Brésil, la croissance s’est accompagnée d’une hausse des inégalités de revenus. De surcroît, cette montée des inégalités s’est produite dans des situations variées et selon des mécanismes très différents. Nous pouvons observer que l’évolution des inégalités de revenus est influencée par une multitude de facteurs – le cadre économique global dans lequel un pays conduit son intégration dans l’économie mondiale peut, en effet, emprunter différentes voies. En fonction du sentier emprunté, les évolutions des inégalités peuvent s’opposer et apparaissent largement dépendantes des politiques nationales de transformation et des politiques sociales adoptées. Les effets liés à la mondialisation ne peuvent donc pas expliquer à eux seuls la montée ou la diminution des inégalités. Après avoir décrit, dans une perspective d’étude comparative, la dynamique croissance-inégalités-pauvreté propre à chaque pays au sein des BRICS, cette étude analysera l’évolution des différentes trajectoires nationales empruntées. Elle proposera également des facteurs explicatifs du changement des inégalités pour chaque pays.

Suggested Citation

  • Porras, Laila, 2015. "Croissance, inégalités et pauvreté au sein des pays émergents : le cas des BRICS," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 18.
    • Handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2015:11480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/11480
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://regulation.revues.org/pdf/11480
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Swaminathan, Madhura & Rawal, Vikas, 2011. "Is India Really a Country of Low Income-Inequality? Observations from Eight Villages," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 1(1), July.
    2. Darryl McLeod & Nora Lustig, 2010. "Inequality and Poverty under Latin America's New Left Regimes," Fordham Economics Discussion Paper Series dp2010-13, Fordham University, Department of Economics.
    3. Mylène Gaulard, 2011. "La lutte contre les inégalités au Brésil : une analyse critique de l'action du gouvernement de Lula," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 111-128.
    4. Fiona Tregenna & Mfanafuthi Tsela, 2012. "Inequality in South Africa: The distribution of income, expenditure and earnings," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 35-61, March.
    5. Stephan Klasen & Ingrid Woolard, 2009. "Surviving Unemployment Without State Support: Unemployment and Household Formation in South Africa," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 18(1), pages 1-51, January.
    6. Julien Vercueil, 2015. "Les pays émergents. Brésil - Russie - Inde - Chine... Mutations économiques, crises et nouveaux défis," Post-Print hal-01445842, HAL.
    7. Mark Weisbrot & Dean Baker & David Rosnick, 2005. "Scorecard on Development: 25 Years of Diminished Progress," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2005-30, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    8. Angus Deaton and Jean Drèze & Jean Drèze, 2002. "Poverty and Inequality in India: A Reexamination," Working papers 107, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    9. François Bourguignon, 2012. "La mondialisation de l'inégalité," Post-Print halshs-00754908, HAL.
    10. Petia Topalova, 2007. "Trade Liberalization, Poverty and Inequality: Evidence from Indian Districts," NBER Chapters, in: Globalization and Poverty, pages 291-336, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Haroon Bhorat & Carlene van der Westhuizen & Toughedah Jacobs, 2009. "Income and Non-Income Inequality in Post-Apartheid South Africa: What are the Drivers and Possible Policy Interventions?," Working Papers 09138, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    12. Raul Silveira Neto & Carlos Azzoni, 2011. "Measuring the Contribution of Social Policies to Regional Inequality Dynamic in Brazil," ERSA conference papers ersa11p659, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ural Marchand, Beyza, 2012. "Tariff pass-through and the distributional effects of trade liberalization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 265-281.
    2. Kumar, Rishabh & Balasubramanian, Sriram & Loungani, Prakash, 2022. "Inequality and locational determinants of the distribution of living standards in India," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 59-69.
    3. J.Salcedo Cain & Rana Hasan & Devashish Mitra, 2010. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty Reduction: New Evidence from Indian States," Working Papers 3333, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University, revised Nov 2010.
    4. Tarozzi, Alessandro & Mahajan, Aprajit, 2007. "Child Nutrition in India in the Nineties," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(3), pages 441-486, April.
    5. Tarozzi, Alessandro & Mahajan, Aprajit, 2007. "Child Nutrition in India in the Nineties," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 55(3), pages 441-486, April.
    6. Dilip Saikia, 2016. "Location Pattern of Unorganised Manufacturing Industries in India: A District-level View," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 10(2), pages 225-263, May.
    7. K.L. Datta, 2006. "The Debate on the Poverty Estimates of 1999–2000," Development Economics Working Papers 22150, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    8. Dmitri Kirpichev & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "The costs of trade protectionism: evidence from Spanish firms and non-tariff measures," Working Papers 1814, Banco de España.
    9. Lucas Chancel & Thomas Piketty, 2019. "Indian Income Inequality, 1922‐2015: From British Raj to Billionaire Raj?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(S1), pages 33-62, November.
    10. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    11. Mitra, Sophie, 2010. "Disability Cash Transfers in the Context of Poverty and Unemployment: The Case of South Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1692-1709, December.
    12. Tiago Pereira, 2016. "The effect of developing countries' competition on regional labour markets in Portugal," GEE Papers 0058, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Mar 2016.
    13. Kondo, Illenin O., 2018. "Trade-induced displacements and local labor market adjustments in the U.S," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 180-202.
    14. Adam Jakubik & Victor Stolzenburg, 2021. "The ‘China Shock’ revisited: insights from value added trade flows," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 67-95.
    15. Giuntella, Osea & Rieger, Matthias & Rotunno, Lorenzo, 2020. "Weight gains from trade in foods: Evidence from Mexico," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Arvind Panagariya & Megha Mukim, 2014. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Poverty in India," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-52, March.
    17. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-114 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Rafael Dix-Carneiro & Brian K. Kovak, 2015. "Trade Reform and Regional Dynamics: Evidence From 25 Years of Brazilian Matched Employer-Employee Data," Upjohn Working Papers 15-225, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    19. Haroon Bhorat & Carlene Van Der Westhuizen & Derek Yu, 2014. "The Silent Success: Delivery of Public Assets Since Democracy," Working Papers 201403, University of Cape Town, Development Policy Research Unit.
    20. Alexandra Sotiriou & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2021. "Chinese vs. US Trade in an Emerging Country: The Impact of Trade Openness in Chile," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(12), pages 2095-2111, December.
    21. Gupta, Poonam & Hasan, Rana & Kumar, Utsav, 2009. "Big Reforms but Small Payoffs: Explaining the Weak Record of Growth and Employment in Indian Manufacturing," MPRA Paper 13496, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BRICS; mondialisation; inégalités de revenus; pauvreté; transformation économique; BRICS; globalization; economic transformation; income inequality; poverty; BRICS; mundialización; desigualdades de ingresos; pobreza; transformación económica;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • P52 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rvr:journl:2015:11480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pascal Seppecher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://theorie-regulation.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.