[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/psl/moneta/202213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citta' e territori in Italia ai tempi della pandemia: Milano come caso-studio. Una rassegna ragionata della letteratura (Cities and territories in Italy at the time of the Pandaemia: Milan as a case study. A reasoned review of the literature)

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Lucarelli

    (Universita' degli Studi di Bergamo)

Abstract
Il paradigma della competizione territoriale prevede che l'oggetto di regolazione sia costituito dalla traiettoria di sviluppo economico della citta' come sistema. Si tratta di un cambiamento radicale rispetto al passato quando le politiche pubbliche per le citta' europee erano indirizzate a correggere soltanto i disequilibri parziali che emergevano a partire da un percorso di sviluppo definito esogenamente dai policy maker nazionali. Lo scopo di questo articolo e' presentare una rassegna ragionata di alcuni contributi recenti che hanno per oggetto l'analisi dei problemi degli spazi urbani in Italia, guardando a Milano come caso studio. La discussione del caso studio avverra' a partire dai contributi di Tajani (2021) e di Calafati, Basellini, De Lorenzo e Zoli (2020). Ci concentreremo innanzitutto sulle conseguenze che il modello di sviluppo economico milanese determina sulla sostenibilita' economica nei diversi quartieri della citta'. Approfondiremo poi il tema degli effetti che le innovazioni sociali possono avere sullo sviluppo economico urbano e territoriale, riferendosi in particolare alla esperienza dei fablab milanesi. Sosterremo che appare urgente e necessaria la messa a punto di un'agenda urbana che ragioni sulla citta'-di-fatto, ripensando innanzitutto i rapporti fra centro e periferie. The paradigm of territorial competition envisages that the object of regulation is the economic development trajectory of the city as a system. This is a radical change from the past, when public policies for European cities were aimed at correcting only the partial imbalances that emerged from a development path exogenously defined by the national policy makers. The purpose of this article is to present a reasoned review of some recent contributions that have as their object the analysis of the problems of urban spaces in Italy, looking at Milan as a case study. The discussion of the case study will take place starting from the contributions of Tajani (2021) and Calafati, Basellini, De Lorenzo and Zoli (2020). We will first focus on the consequences that the Milanese economic development model determines on economic sustainability in different neighborhoods of the city. We will then delve into the theme of the effects that social innovations can have on urban and territorial economic development, referring in particular to the experience of Milan's fablabs. We will argue that it seems urgent and necessary to develop an urban agenda that considers the city de facto, rethinking first of all the relationship between the center and the suburbs.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Lucarelli, 2022. "Citta' e territori in Italia ai tempi della pandemia: Milano come caso-studio. Una rassegna ragionata della letteratura (Cities and territories in Italy at the time of the Pandaemia: Milan as a case s," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(297), pages 41-59.
    • Handle: RePEc:psl:moneta:2022:13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/moneta_e_credito/article/view/17738/16838
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sonia Stefanizzi & Valeria Verdolini, 2022. "A “space” of one’s own: identity and conflict in two Milan districts," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 109-130, February.
    2. Raphaël Suire, 2019. "Innovating by bricolage: how do firms diversify through knowledge interactions with FabLabs?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(7), pages 939-950, July.
    3. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2017. "The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)," CEPR Discussion Papers 12473, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Raphaël Suire, 2019. "Innovating by bricolage: how do firms diversify through knowledge interactions with FabLabs?," Post-Print hal-02371817, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Étienne Capron & Raphaël Suire, 2024. "From One Place to Another -Place Attendance as Resources for Innovators," Post-Print hal-04599868, HAL.
    2. Jianyu Zhao & Yining Huang & Xi Xi & Shanshan Wang, 2021. "How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 889-919, June.
    3. Jennifer Johns & Sarah Marie Hall, 2020. "‘I have so little time […] I got shit I need to do’: Critical perspectives on making and sharing in Manchester’s FabLab," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(7), pages 1292-1312, October.
    4. Beltagui, Ahmad & Sesis, Achilleas & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Mengmeng Meng & Jiasu Lei & Jie Jiao & Qiuyan Tao, 2020. "How does strategic flexibility affect bricolage: The moderating role of environmental turbulence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Sophie Boutillier & Ignasi Capdevila & Laurent Dupont & Laure Morel, 2020. "Collaborative spaces promoting creativity and innovation," Post-Print hal-02878132, HAL.
    7. Patrick Cohendet & David Grandadam & Raphaël Suire, 2021. "Reconsidering the dynamics of local knowledge creation: Middlegrounds and local innovation commons in the case of FabLabs," Post-Print hal-03622101, HAL.
    8. Sharma, Gautam & Haldar, Stuti, 2023. "Dynamics of innovation in makerspaces and fabrication labs: a systematic literature review," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    9. Etienne Capron & Dominique Sagot-Duvauroux & Raphaël Suire, 2020. "Anatomy of a techno-creative community : the role of places and events in the emergence of videomapping in Nantes," Working Papers hal-02617101, HAL.
    10. Cohendet Patrick & Grandadam David & Suire Raphaël, 2021. "Reconsidering the dynamics of local knowledge creation: Middlegrounds and local innovation commons in the case of FabLabs," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 65(1), pages 1-11, March.
    11. repec:ces:ifofor:v:19:y:2018:i:1:p:10-15 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Manfred Perlik, 2021. "Impacts of Social Innovation on Spatiality in Mountain–Lowland Relationships — Trajectories of Two Swiss Regional Initiatives in the Context of New Policy Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Maruseva, Valeria & Kroll, Henning, 2024. "Potential and resilience: Evidence from peripheral regions of Germany," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 82, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    citta' globale; citta' di fatto; innovazione sociale; Milano; agenda urbana; rendita;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population
    • R38 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:psl:moneta:2022:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlo D'Ippoliti (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economiacivile.it .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.