surface drip irrigation (DI) > subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) > flood irrigation (FI) under equivalent irrigation volumes. Notably, SDI emerges as a promising strategy for concurrent water conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation. Switching from over-surface and surface drip irrigation to subsurface drip irrigation yields a reduction of 60.8 % and 46.3 % in carbon emissions per cubic meter of water saved, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for the development of sustainable irrigation practices and emphasizes the importance of integrating groundwater degassing potential into agricultural carbon budgets and emission mitigation strategies."> surface drip irrigation (DI) > subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) > flood irrigation (FI) under equivalent irrigation volumes. Notably, SDI emerges as a promising strategy for concurrent water conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation. Switching from over-surface and surface drip irrigation to subsurface drip irrigation yields a reduction of 60.8 % and 46.3 % in carbon emissions per cubic meter of water saved, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for the development of sustainable irrigation practices and emphasizes the importance of integrating groundwater degassing potential into agricultural carbon budgets and emission mitigation strategies.">
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v301y2024ics0378377424002762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Degassing of greenhouse gases from groundwater under different irrigation methods: A neglected carbon source in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Huo, Pan
  • Gao, Pengcheng
Abstract
The degassing potential of supersaturated dissolved greenhouse gases (N2O, CO2, and CH4) in groundwater has often been overlooked as a source of emissions in irrigated agriculture. Quantifying the degassing potential and investigating measures are essential for agricultural carbon mitigation. This study estimated for the first time the direct greenhouse gas degassing potential from groundwater under different irrigation methods and explored mitigation strategies in the Guanzhong Basin, Northwest China. The results revealed that while short-term degassing potential from groundwater irrigation exceeds that reported for global inland waters and fertilized soils, the interannual degassing potential (13,819–52,163 t CO2-eq year−1) represents only 0.3–1.1 % of annual emissions from regional agricultural soils. The degassing potential exhibited a trend of over-surface drip irrigation (ODI) > surface drip irrigation (DI) > subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) > flood irrigation (FI) under equivalent irrigation volumes. Notably, SDI emerges as a promising strategy for concurrent water conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation. Switching from over-surface and surface drip irrigation to subsurface drip irrigation yields a reduction of 60.8 % and 46.3 % in carbon emissions per cubic meter of water saved, respectively. This study provides valuable insights for the development of sustainable irrigation practices and emphasizes the importance of integrating groundwater degassing potential into agricultural carbon budgets and emission mitigation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Huo, Pan & Gao, Pengcheng, 2024. "Degassing of greenhouse gases from groundwater under different irrigation methods: A neglected carbon source in agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002762
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002762
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kandelous, Maziar M. & Simunek, Jirí, 2010. "Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(7), pages 1070-1076, July.
    2. Tianpeng Wang & Fei Teng, 2023. "Damage function uncertainty increases the social cost of methane and nitrous oxide," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(11), pages 1258-1265, November.
    3. Guardia, Guillermo & Monistrol-Arcas, Alba & Montoya, Mónica & García-Gutiérrez, Sandra & Abalos, Diego & Vallejo, Antonio, 2023. "Subsurface drip irrigation reduces CH4 emissions and ecosystem respiration compared to surface drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    4. Wang, Haidong & Wang, Naijiang & Quan, Hao & Zhang, Fucang & Fan, Junliang & Feng, Hao & Cheng, Minghui & Liao, Zhenqi & Wang, Xiukang & Xiang, Youzhen, 2022. "Yield and water productivity of crops, vegetables and fruits under subsurface drip irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. van der Kooij, Saskia & Zwarteveen, Margreet & Boesveld, Harm & Kuper, Marcel, 2013. "The efficiency of drip irrigation unpacked," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 103-110.
    6. Jingxiu Qin & Weili Duan & Shan Zou & Yaning Chen & Wenjing Huang & Lorenzo Rosa, 2024. "Global energy use and carbon emissions from irrigated agriculture," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Tang, Jianjun & Folmer, Henk & Xue, Jianhong, 2015. "Technical and allocative efficiency of irrigation water use in the Guanzhong Plain, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 43-52.
    8. Golam Saleh Ahmed Salem & So Kazama & Shamsuddin Shahid & Nepal C. Dey, 2018. "Groundwater-dependent irrigation costs and benefits for adaptation to global change," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 953-979, August.
    9. Franco-Luesma, Samuel & Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge & Plaza-Bonilla, Daniel & Arrúe, José Luis & Cantero-Martínez, Carlos & Cavero, José, 2019. "Influence of irrigation time and frequency on greenhouse gas emissions in a solid-set sprinkler-irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 303-311.
    10. Robert H. Beach & Benjamin J. DeAngelo & Steven Rose & Changsheng Li & William Salas & Stephen J. DelGrosso, 2008. "Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions-super-1," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(2), pages 109-115, March.
    11. Dave S. Reay & Eric A. Davidson & Keith A. Smith & Pete Smith & Jerry M. Melillo & Frank Dentener & Paul J. Crutzen, 2012. "Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 410-416, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajay Gambhir & Tamaryn Napp & Adam Hawkes & Lena Höglund-Isaksson & Wilfried Winiwarter & Pallav Purohit & Fabian Wagner & Dan Bernie & Jason Lowe, 2017. "The Contribution of Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation to Achieving Long-Term Temperature Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Li, Yunfeng & Yu, Qihua & Ning, Huifeng & Gao, Yang & Sun, Jingsheng, 2023. "Simulation of soil water, heat, and salt adsorptive transport under film mulched drip irrigation in an arid saline-alkali area using HYDRUS-2D," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Giuliani, Nicola & Aguzzoni, Agnese & Penna, Daniele & Tagliavini, Massimo, 2023. "Estimating uptake and internal transport dynamics of irrigation water in apple trees using deuterium-enriched water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    4. Forough Jafary & Chris Bradley, 2018. "Groundwater Irrigation Management and the Existing Challenges from the Farmers’ Perspective in Central Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Lili Guo & Yuting Song & Mengqian Tang & Jinyang Tang & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Mengying Su & Houjian Li, 2022. "Assessing the Relationship among Land Transfer, Fertilizer Usage, and PM 2.5 Pollution: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Zhang, Fengtai & Xiao, Yuedong & Gao, Lei & Ma, Dalai & Su, Ruiqi & Yang, Qing, 2022. "How agricultural water use efficiency varies in China—A spatial-temporal analysis considering unexpected outputs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. B. Henderson & A. Golub & D. Pambudi & T. Hertel & C. Godde & M. Herrero & O. Cacho & P. Gerber, 2018. "The power and pain of market-based carbon policies: a global application to greenhouse gases from ruminant livestock production," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 349-369, March.
    8. Innocent Bakam & Robin Matthews, 2009. "Emission trading in agriculture: a study of design options using an agent-based approach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(8), pages 755-776, December.
    9. Felizitas Winkhart & Thomas Mösl & Harald Schmid & Kurt-Jürgen Hülsbergen, 2022. "Effects of Organic Maize Cropping Systems on Nitrogen Balances and Nitrous Oxide Emissions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, June.
    10. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Šimůnek, Jirka & Lægdsmand, Mette, 2014. "Simulation of the redistribution and fate of contaminants from soil-injected animal slurry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 17-29.
    11. Stafford, William & Birch, Catherine & Etter, Hannes & Blanchard, Ryan & Mudavanhu, Shepherd & Angelstam, Per & Blignaut, James & Ferreira, Louwrens & Marais, Christo, 2017. "The economics of landscape restoration: Benefits of controlling bush encroachment and invasive plant species in South Africa and Namibia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(PB), pages 193-202.
    12. Yu, Ziyue & Zhang, Fan & Gao, Chenzhen & Mangi, Eugenio & Ali, Cheshmehzangi, 2024. "The potential for bioenergy generated on marginal land to offset agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    13. Guofeng Wang & Pu Liu & Jinmiao Hu & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Agriculture-Induced N 2 O Emissions and Reduction Strategies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Anik, Asif Reza & Eory, Vera & Begho, Toritseju & Rahman, Md. Mizanur, 2023. "Determinants of nitrogen use efficiency and gaseous emissions assessed from farm survey: A case of wheat in Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. De Cara, Stéphane & Jayet, Pierre-Alain, 2011. "Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions from European agriculture, cost effectiveness, and the EU non-ETS burden sharing agreement," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(9), pages 1680-1690, July.
    16. Liu, Xiaoli & Wang, Yandong & Zhang, Yuehe & Ren, Xiaolong & Chen, Xiaoli, 2022. "Can rainwater harvesting replace conventional irrigation for winter wheat production in dry semi-humid areas in China?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    17. MacLeod, Michael & Moran, Dominic & Eory, Vera & Rees, R.M. & Barnes, Andrew & Topp, Cairistiona F.E. & Ball, Bruce & Hoad, Steve & Wall, Eileen & McVittie, Alistair & Pajot, Guillaume & Matthews, Rob, 2010. "Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(4), pages 198-209, May.
    18. Philip Kofi Adom & Joonho Yeo & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Is water use sustainable and efficient in China? Evidence from a macro level analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(53), pages 6166-6183, November.
    19. Kilic, Murat, 2020. "A new analytical method for estimating the 3D volumetric wetting pattern under drip irrigation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Zhao, Ying & Zhai, Xiafei & Wang, Zhaohui & Li, Huijie & Jiang, Rui & Lee Hill, Robert & Si, Bing & Hao, Feng, 2018. "Simulation of soil water and heat flow in ridge cultivation with plastic film mulching system on the Chinese Loess Plateau," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 99-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:301:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424002762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.