[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersra/289795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Federal Funding’s Unique Role in Appalachia

Author

Listed:
  • Bagi, Faqir S.
  • Reeder, Richard J.
  • Calhoun, Samuel D.
Abstract
Rural Appalachia received relatively low levels of Federal funds in fiscal year 1997 compared with urban Appalachia. Although it had relatively high income support payments, reflecting high rates of poverty and unemployment, rural Appalachia received less per capita in Federal funding for community resources and other programs that create jobs and development. Mining and poverty counties were the chief rural beneficiaries of income support payments, while the more populous and prosperous rural manufacturing and commuting areas benefited more from community resource programs. Some Federal policy trends may further the region’s growth, particularly the recent increase in highway aid and changes in telecommunications, while environmental policy, welfare reform, and proposals to reduce or limit the growth of income support and economic development programs present challenges to the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagi, Faqir S. & Reeder, Richard J. & Calhoun, Samuel D., 1999. "Federal Funding’s Unique Role in Appalachia," Rural America/ Rural Development Perspectives, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 14(1), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289795
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289795/files/rdpmay99d.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersra:289795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.