8000 chore: Add PR number to payload of libXRPL compatibility check workflow by godexsoft · Pull Request #5310 · XRPLF/rippled · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

chore: Add PR number to payload of libXRPL compatibility check workflow #5310

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

godexsoft
Copy link
Collaborator

High Level Overview of Change

This PR adds one more payload field to the libXRPL compatibility check workflow - the PR number itself.
This will enable us to implement XRPLF/clio#1916 in Clio's CI.

Context of Change

XRPLF/clio#1916

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
  • Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation update
  • Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
  • Release

API Impact

  • Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
  • Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
  • libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
  • Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

< 8000 span class="Skeleton d-inline-block" style="width:12px; height:12px;">
Copy link
codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.1%. Comparing base (345ddc7) to head (0ad22a5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #5310     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     78.1%   78.1%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files          790     790             
  Lines        67911   67911             
  Branches      8232    8234      +2     
=========================================
- Hits         53032   53027      -5     
- Misses       14879   14884      +5     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator
@ximinez ximinez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems straightforward enough, but the branch jobs did not run the altered step. I think that only works after it's merged to develop, so we'll have to double-check then.

@bthomee bthomee enabled auto-merge (squash) March 18, 2025 16:48
@bthomee bthomee merged commit 7fe81fe into XRPLF:develop Mar 18, 2025
24 checks passed
mvadari added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
* Set version to 2.4.0

* refactor: Remove unused and add missing includes (#5293)

The codebase is filled with includes that are unused, and which thus can be removed. At the same time, the files often do not include all headers that contain the definitions used in those files. This change uses clang-format and clang-tidy to clean up the includes, with minor manual intervention to ensure the code compiles on all platforms.

* refactor: Calculate numFeatures automatically (#5324)

Requiring manual updates of numFeatures is an annoying manual process that is easily forgotten, and leads to frequent merge conflicts. This change takes advantage of the `XRPL_FEATURE` and `XRPL_FIX` macros, and adds a new `XRPL_RETIRE` macro to automatically set `numFeatures`.

* refactor: Improve ordering of headers with clang-format (#5343)

Removes all manual header groupings from source and header files by leveraging clang-format options.

* Rename "deadlock" to "stall" in `LoadManager` (#5341)

What the LoadManager class does is stall detection, which is not the same as deadlock detection. In the condition of severe CPU starvation, LoadManager will currently intentionally crash rippled reporting `LogicError: Deadlock detected`. This error message is misleading as the condition being detected is not a deadlock. This change fixes and refactors the code in response.

* Adds hub.xrpl-commons.org as a new Bootstrap Cluster (#5263)

* fix: Error message for ledger_entry rpc (#5344)

Changes the error to `malformedAddress` for `permissioned_domain` in the `ledger_entry` rpc, when the account is not a string. This change makes it more clear to a user what is wrong with their request.

* fix: Handle invalid marker parameter in grpc call (#5317)

The `end_marker` is used to limit the range of ledger entries to fetch. If `end_marker` is less than `marker`, a crash can occur. This change adds an additional check.

* fix: trust line RPC no ripple flag (#5345)

The Trustline RPC `no_ripple` flag gets set depending on `lsfDefaultRipple` flag, which is not a flag of a trustline but of the account root. The `lsfDefaultRipple` flag does not provide any insight if this particular trust line has `lsfLowNoRipple` or `lsfHighNoRipple` flag set, so it should not be used here at all. This change simplifies the logic.

* refactor: Updates Conan dependencies: RocksDB (#5335)

Updates RocksDB to version 9.7.3, the latest version supported in Conan 1.x. A patch for 9.7.4 that fixes a memory leak is included.

* fix: Remove null pointer deref, just do abort (#5338)

This change removes the existing undefined behavior from `LogicError`, so we can be certain that there will be always a stacktrace.

De-referencing a null pointer is an old trick to generate `SIGSEGV`, which would typically also create a stacktrace. However it is also an undefined behaviour and compilers can do something else. A more robust way to create a stacktrace while crashing the program is to use `std::abort`, which we have also used in this location for a long time. If we combine the two, we might not get the expected behaviour - namely, the nullpointer deref followed by `std::abort`, as handled in certain compiler versions may not immediately cause a crash. We have observed stacktrace being wiped instead, and thread put in indeterminate state, then stacktrace created without any useful information.

* chore: Add PR number to payload (#5310)

This PR adds one more payload field to the libXRPL compatibility check workflow - the PR number itself.

* chore: Update link to ripple-binary-codec (#5355)

The link to ripple-binary-codec's definitions.json appears to be outdated. The updated link is also documented here: https://xrpl.org/docs/references/protocol/binary-format#definitions-file

* Prevent consensus from getting stuck in the establish phase (#5277)

- Detects if the consensus process is "stalled". If it is, then we can declare a 
  consensus and end successfully even if we do not have 80% agreement on
  our proposal.
  - "Stalled" is defined as:
    - We have a close time consensus
    - Each disputed transaction is individually stalled:
      - It has been in the final "stuck" 95% requirement for at least 2
        (avMIN_ROUNDS) "inner rounds" of phaseEstablish,
      - and either all of the other trusted proposers or this validator, if proposing,
        have had the same vote(s) for at least 4 (avSTALLED_ROUNDS) "inner
        rounds", and at least 80% of the validators (including this one, if
        appropriate) agree about the vote (whether yes or no).
- If we have been in the establish phase for more than 10x the previous
  consensus establish phase's time, then consensus is considered "expired",
  and we will leave the round, which sends a partial validation (indicating
  that the node is moving on without validating). Two restrictions avoid
  prematurely exiting, or having an extended exit in extreme situations.
  - The 10x time is clamped to be within a range of 15s
    (ledgerMAX_CONSENSUS) to 120s (ledgerABANDON_CONSENSUS).
  - If consensus has not had an opportunity to walk through all avalanche
    states (defined as not going through 8 "inner rounds" of phaseEstablish),
    then ConsensusState::Expired is treated as ConsensusState::No.
- When enough nodes leave the round, any remaining nodes will see they've
  fallen behind, and move on, too, generally before hitting the timeout. Any
  validations or partial validations sent during this time will help the
  consensus process bring the nodes back together.

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Legleux <mlegleux@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: Bart <bthomee@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ed Hennis <ed@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: Bronek Kozicki <brok@incorrekt.com>
Co-authored-by: Darius Tumas <Tokeiito@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sergey Kuznetsov <skuznetsov@ripple.com>
Co-authored-by: cyan317 <120398799+cindyyan317@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vlad <129996061+vvysokikh1@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Kremer <akremer@ripple.com>
Tapanito pushed a commit to Tapanito/rippled that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2025
This PR adds one more payload field to the libXRPL compatibility check workflow - the PR number itself.
Tapanito pushed a commit to Tapanito/rippled that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
This PR adds one more payload field to the libXRPL compatibility check workflow - the PR number itself.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0