[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Scene-motion thresholds during head yaw for immersive virtual environments

Published: 05 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In order to better understand how scene motion is perceived in immersive virtual environments, we measured scene-motion thresholds under different conditions across three experiments. Thresholds were measured during quasi-sinusoidal head yaw, single left-to-right or right-to-left head yaw, different phases of head yaw, slow to fast head yaw, scene motion relative to head yaw, and two scene-illumination levels. We found that across various conditions (1) thresholds are greater when the scene moves with head yaw (corresponding to gain <1.0) than when the scene moves against head yaw (corresponding to gain >1.0), and (2) thresholds increase as head motion increases.

References

[1]
Adelstein, B. D., Burns, E. M., Ellis, S. R., and Hill, M. I. 2005. Latency discrimination mechanisms in virtual environments: Velocity and displacement error factors. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2221--2225.
[2]
Adelstein, B. D., Lee, T., and Ellis, S. R. 2003. Head tracking latency in virtual environments: Pyschophysics and a model. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2083--2987.
[3]
Adelstein, B. D., Li, L., Jerald, J., and Ellis, S. R. 2006. Suppression of head-referenced image motion during head movement. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2678--2682.
[4]
Allison, R. S., Harris, L. R., Jenkin, M., Jasiobedzka, U., and Zacher, J. E. 2001. Tolerance of temporal delay in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 247--253.
[5]
Anstis, S. 1986. Motion perception in the frontal plane: Sensory aspects. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, K.R. Bo et al. Eds, Wiley-Interscience, New York, Ch. 16.
[6]
Bruder, G., Steinicke, F., Hinrichs, K. H., and Lappe, M. 2009. Reorientation during body turns. In Proceedings of the Joint Virtual Reality Conference of EGVE. 145--152.
[7]
Coren, S., Ward, L. M., and Enns, J. T. 1999. Sensation and Perception 5th Ed. Harcourt Brace.
[8]
Draper, M. H. 1998. The adaptive effects of virtual interfaces: Vestibulo-ocular reflex and simulator sickness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
[9]
Dyde, R. T. and Harris, L. R. 2008. The influence of retinal and extra-retinal motion cues on perceived object motion duringself motion. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 8, 14, 1--10.
[10]
Ellis, S. R., Adelstein, B. D., Baumeler, S., Jense, G. J., and Jacoby, R. H. 1999. Sensor spatial distortion, visual latency and update rate effects on 3D tracking in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 218--221.
[11]
Ellis, S. R., Mania, K., Adelstein, B. D., and Hill, M. I. 2004. Generalizability of latency detection in a variety of virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2083--2087.
[12]
Engel, D., Curio, C., Tcheang, L., Mohler, B., and Bulthoff, H. H. 2008. A psychophysically calibrated controller for navigating through large environments in a limited free-walking space. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST'08). 157--164.
[13]
Freeman, T. and Banks, M. 1998. Perceived head-centric speed is affected by both extra-retinal and retinal errors. Vision Res. 38, 7, 941--945.
[14]
Gogel, W. C. 1990. A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications. Percept. Psychophys. 48, 2, 105--123.
[15]
Goldstein, E. B. 2007. Sensation and Perception 7th Ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
[16]
Graham, C. 1965. Perception of movement. In Vision and Visual Perception, C. Graham Ed., Wiley, New York, Chapter 20.
[17]
Hochberg, Y. 1988. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75, 4, 800--802.
[18]
Holloway, R. 1997. Registration error analysis for augmented reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 6, 4, 413--432.
[19]
Jaekl, P. M., Jenkin, M. R., and Harris, L. R. 2005. Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements. Exper. Brain Res. 163, 3, 388--399.
[20]
Jerald, J. 2009. Scene-motion- and latency-perception thresholds for head-mounted displays. Ph.D. dissertation, Tech. rep. TR10-013, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
[21]
Jerald, J., Peck, T., Steinicke, F., and Whitton, M. 2008. Sensitivity to scene motion for phases of head yaws. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 155--162.
[22]
Jerald, J. and Steinicke, F. 2009. Scene instability during head turns. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on Perceptual Illusions in Virtual Environments (PIVE). 4--6.
[23]
Jerald, J., Steinicke, F., and Whitton, M. 2009. Scene-motion thresholds correlate with angular head motions for immersive virtual environments. In Proceedings of Advances in Computer-Human Interaction. 69--75.
[24]
Jerald, J. and Whitton, M. 2009. Relating scene-motion thresholds to latency thresholds for head-mounted displays. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 211--218.
[25]
Li, L., Adelstein, B. D., and Ellis, S. R. 2009. Perception of image motion during head movement. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 6, 1, 1--15.
[26]
Loomis, J. M. and Knapp, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ.
[27]
Loose, R. and Probst, T. 2001. Velocity not acceleration of self-motion mediates vestibular-visual interaction. Perception 30, 4, 511--518.
[28]
Mania, K., Adelstein, B. D., Ellis, S. R., and Hill, M. I. 2004. Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. 39--47.
[29]
Meehan, M., Brooks, F., Razzaque, S., and Whitton, M. 2003. Effects of latency on presence in stressful virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 141--148.
[30]
Miller, D. 2002. Personal communication.
[31]
Peck, T., Whitton, M., and Fuchs, H. 2008. Evaluation of reorientation techniques for walking in large virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 121--127.
[32]
Razzaque, S., Kohn, Z., and Whitton, M. 2001. Redirected walking. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Environments (EGVE). Eurographics, 289--294.
[33]
So, R. and Griffin, M. 1995. Effects of lags on human operator transfer functions with head-coupled systems. Aviation, Space Environ. Med. 66, 6, 550--556.
[34]
Steinicke, F., Bruder, G., Jerald, J., Frenz, H., and Lappe, M. 2010. Estimation of detection thresholds for redirected walking techniques. IEEE Trans.Visual. Comput. Graph. 16, 1, 17-21.
[35]
Wallach, H. 1987. Perceiving a stable environment when one moves. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 38, 1--27.
[36]
Wallach, H. and Kravitz, J. H. 1965. The measurement of the constancy of visual direction and of its adaptation. Psychonomic Sci. 2, 217--218.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Driving simulation: the effects of interactivity and presentation settingFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.14847395Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2022)Influence of Sensory Conflict on Perceived Timing of Passive Rotation in Virtual RealityMultisensory Research10.1163/22134808-bja1007435:5(367-389)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
  • (2022)The Effects on Driving Behavior When Using a Head-mounted Display in a Dynamic Driving SimulatorACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/348379319:1(1-18)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 9, Issue 1
March 2012
95 pages
ISSN:1544-3558
EISSN:1544-3965
DOI:10.1145/2134203
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 March 2012
Accepted: 01 April 2011
Revised: 01 August 2010
Received: 01 February 2009
Published in TAP Volume 9, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Psychophysics
  2. head motion
  3. latency
  4. redirected walking
  5. scene-motion thresholds

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Driving simulation: the effects of interactivity and presentation settingFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.14847395Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2022)Influence of Sensory Conflict on Perceived Timing of Passive Rotation in Virtual RealityMultisensory Research10.1163/22134808-bja1007435:5(367-389)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2022
  • (2022)The Effects on Driving Behavior When Using a Head-mounted Display in a Dynamic Driving SimulatorACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/348379319:1(1-18)Online publication date: 6-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Real-Time Aspects of VR SystemsVirtual and Augmented Reality (VR/AR)10.1007/978-3-030-79062-2_7(245-289)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
  • (2020)Effect of Cognitive Load on Curvature Redirected Walking ThresholdsProceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3385956.3418950(1-5)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2020
  • (2020)Low-Latency Rendering With Dataflow ArchitecturesIEEE Computer Graphics and Applications10.1109/MCG.2020.298018340:3(94-104)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
  • (2019)Low-cost, high-performance VR delay detection device based on PIN photodiodeOptoelectronic Devices and Integration VIII10.1117/12.2537640(30)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2019
  • (2019)The IEEE 1918.1 “Tactile Internet” Standards Working Group and its StandardsProceedings of the IEEE10.1109/JPROC.2018.2885541107:2(256-279)Online publication date: Feb-2019
  • (2019)Towards dynamic modeling of visual-vestibular conflict detection10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.018Online publication date: 2019
  • (2019)Neural Network 3D Body Pose Tracking and Prediction for Motion-to-Photon Latency Compensation in Distributed Virtual RealityArtificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2019: Image Processing10.1007/978-3-030-30508-6_35(429-442)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media