More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Open access

Exergy: A Toolkit to Simplify Creative Applications of Wind Energy Harvesting

Authors:

Jung Wook Park,

Sienna Xin Sun,

Gregory D. Abowd,

Rosa I. ArriagaAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, Volume 7, Issue 1

Article No.: 25, Pages 1 - 28

https://doi.org/10.1145/3580814

Published: 28 March 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Energy harvesting reduces the burden of power source maintenance and promises to make computing systems genuinely ubiquitous. Researchers have made inroads in this area, but their novel energy harvesting materials and fabrication techniques remain inaccessible to the general maker communities. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a toolkit that makes energy harvesting accessible to novices. In Study 1, we investigate the challenges and opportunities associated with devising energy harvesting technology with experienced researchers and makers (N=9). Using the lessons learned from this investigation, we design a wind energy harvesting toolkit, Exergy, in Study 2. It consists of a simulator, hardware tools, a software example, and ideation cards. We apply it to vehicle environments, which have yet to be explored despite their potential. In Study 3, we conduct a two-phase workshop: hands-on experience and ideation sessions. The results show that novices (N=23) could use Exergy confidently and invent self-sustainable energy harvesting applications creatively.

Supplemental Material

ZIP File - park

Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Exergy: A Toolkit to Simplify Creative Applications of Wind Energy Harvesting

Download
647.92 KB

References

[1]

Tessa Aarts, Linas K Gabrielaitis, Lianne C de Jong, Renee Noortman, Emma M van Zoelen, Sophia Kotea, Silvia Cazacu, Lesley L Lock, and Panos Markopoulos. 2020. Design Card Sets: Systematic Literature Survey and Card Sorting Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 419--428. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395516

Digital Library

[2]

G D Abowd. 2020. The Internet of Materials: A Vision for Computational Materials. IEEE Pervasive Computing 19, 2 (4 2020), 56--62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2020.2982475

[3]

Slavisa Aleksic. 2013. Energy, Entropy and Exergy in Communication Networks. Entropy 15, 10 (2013), 4484--4503. https://doi.org/10.3390/e15104484

[4]

Cristina L Archer. 2013. An Introduction to Meteorology for Airborne Wind Energy BT - Airborne Wind Energy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 81--94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39965-7{_}5

[5]

Jatin Arora, Kartik Mathur, Manvi Goel, Piyush Kumar, Abhijeet Mishra, and Aman Parnami. 2020. Design and Evaluation of DIO Construction Toolkit for Co-Making Shared Constructions. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 4 (9 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3369833

Digital Library

[6]

Nivedita Arora, Steven L. Zhang, Fereshteh Shahmiri, Diego Osorio, Yi-Cheng Wang, Mohit Gupta, Zhengjun Wang, Thad Starner, Zhong Lin Wang, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2018. SATURN: A Thin and Flexible Self-Powered Microphone Leveraging Triboelectric Nanogenerator. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 2 (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3214263 Place: New York, NY, USA Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery.

Digital Library

[7]

Ilhan Aslan, Katharina Weitz, Ruben Schlagowski, Simon Flutura, Susana Garcia Valesco, Marius Pfeil, and Elisabeth André. 2019. Creativity Support and Multimodal Pen-Based Interaction. In 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135--144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3353738

Digital Library

[8]

Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574--594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

[9]

Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, Cindy Lin, Silvia Lindtner, and Austin Toombs. 2017. HCI's Making Agendas. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11, 3 (12 2017), 126--200. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000066

Digital Library

[10]

Fariba Besharat, Ali A Dehghan, and Ahmad R Faghih. 2013. Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: A review and case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 21 (2013), 798--821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.043

[11]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.

[12]

Nathalie Bressa, Kendra Wannamaker, Henrik Korsgaard, Wesley Willett, and Jo Vermeulen. 2019. Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173--185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322326

Digital Library

[13]

Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino: Using Computational Textiles to Investigate Engagement, Aesthetics, and Diversity in Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 423--432. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357123

Digital Library

[14]

Erin A Carroll, Celine Latulipe, Richard Fung, and Michael Terry. 2009. Creativity Factor Evaluation: Towards a Standardized Survey Metric for Creativity Support. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127--136. https://doi.org/10.1145/1640233.1640255

Digital Library

[15]

Christopher Chen, David Howard, Steven L Zhang, Youngwook Do, Sienna Sun, Tingyu Cheng, Zhong Lin Wang, Gregory D Abowd, and HyunJoo Oh. 2020. SPIN (Self-Powered Paper Interfaces): Bridging Triboelectric Nanogenerator with Folding Paper Creases. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney, 431--442. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374946

Digital Library

[16]

Erin Cherry and Celine Latulipe. 2014. Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 4 (6 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2617588

Digital Library

[17]

Jae Eun Chung, Namkee Park, Hua Wang, Janet Fulk, and Margaret McLaughlin. 2010. Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1674--1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016

Digital Library

[18]

Fred D Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (10 1989), 319--340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Digital Library

[19]

Hayley Evans, Udaya Lakshmi, Hue Watson, Azra Ismail, Andrew M Sherrill, Neha Kumar, and Rosa I Arriaga. 2020. Understanding the Care Ecologies of Veterans with PTSD. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376170

Digital Library

[20]

S Mitchell Finnigan, A K Clear, G Farr-Wharton, K Ladha, and R Comber. 2017. Augmenting Audits: Exploring the Role of Sensor Toolkits in Sustainable Buildings Management. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2 (6 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3090075

Digital Library

[21]

Marina Fridin and Mark Belokopytov. 2014. Acceptance of socially assistive humanoid robot by preschool and elementary school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 33 (2014), 23--31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.016

Digital Library

[22]

C Gardner and D L Amoroso. 2004. Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of Internet technology by consumers. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the. 10 pp.-. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265623

[23]

Neil Gershenfeld. 2005. FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. Science News 167, 20 (2005), 319.

[24]

Saul Greenberg. 2007. Toolkits and interface creativity. Multimedia Tools and Applications 32, 2 (2007), 139--159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-006-0062-y

Digital Library

[25]

Saul Greenberg and Chester Fitchett. 2001. Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces through Physical Widgets. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 209--218. https://doi.org/10.1145/502348.502388

Digital Library

[26]

Manoj Gulati, Farshid Salemi Parizi, Eric Whitmire, Sidhant Gupta, Shobha Sundar Ram, Amarjeet Singh, and Shwetak N Patel. 2018. CapHarvester: A stick-on capacitive energy harvester using stray electric field from AC power lines. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 1--20. Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.

Digital Library

[27]

Jeremy Gummeson, Bodhi Priyantha, and Jie Liu. 2014. An Energy Harvesting Wearable Ring Platform for Gestureinput on Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 162--175. https://doi.org/10.1145/2594368.2594389

Digital Library

[28]

MA Halim, R Rantz, Q Zhang, L Gu, K Yang, and SJAE Roundy. 2018. An electromagnetic rotational energy harvester using sprung eccentric rotor, driven by pseudo-walking motion. Applied Energy 217 (2018), 66--74. Publisher: Elsevier.

[29]

Donna Haraway. 1987. A manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies 2, 4 (3 1987), 1--42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538

[30]

L Haritaipan, M Saijo, and C Mougenot. 2018. Leveraging creativity of design students with a magic-based inspiration tool. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2018). 265--270.

[31]

Rex Hartson and Partha S Pyla. 2012. Chapter 4 - Contextual Analysis: Consolidating and Interpreting Work Activity Data. In The UX Book, Rex Hartson and Partha S Pyla (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 129--160. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385241-0.00004-X

[32]

Jeffrey Heer, Stuart K Card, and James A Landay. 2005. Prefuse: A Toolkit for Interactive Information Visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 421--430. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055031

Digital Library

[33]

Eric von. Hippel. 2005. Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

[34]

Heather Holden and Roy Rada. 2011. Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers' Technology Acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 43, 4 (2011), 343--367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576

[35]

Scott E Hudson. 2014. Printing Teddy Bears: A Technique for 3D Printing of Soft Interactive Objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 459--468. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557338

Digital Library

[36]

Natsuki Ikeda, Ryo Shigeta, Junichiro Shiomi, and Yoshihiro Kawahara. 2020. Soil-Monitoring Sensor Powered by Temperature Difference between Air and Shallow Underground Soil. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 1 (3 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3380995

Digital Library

[37]

Santosh Jagtap. 2019. Design creativity: refined method for novelty assessment. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 7, 1-2 (2019), 99--115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1463176

[38]

Vito Kortbeek, Abu Bakar, Stefany Cruz, Kasim Sinan Yildirim, Przemyslaw Pawelczak, and Josiah Hester. 2020. BFree: Enabling Battery-Free Sensor Prototyping with Python. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 4 (12 2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432191

Digital Library

[39]

Pin-Sung Ku, Md. Tahmidul Islam Molla, Kunpeng Huang, Priya Kattappurath, Krithik Ranjan, and Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao. 2022. SkinKit: Construction Kit for On-Skin Interface Prototyping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 4 (12 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3494989

Digital Library

[40]

Mannu Lambrichts, Raf Ramakers, Steve Hodges, Sven Coppers, and James Devine. 2021. A Survey and Taxonomy of Electronics Toolkits for Interactive and Ubiquitous Device Prototyping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 2 (6 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3463523

Digital Library

[41]

David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173610

Digital Library

[42]

James R Lewis. 2018. The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 34, 7 (2018), 577--590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

[43]

Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging Sites of HCI Innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups & Incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 439--448. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557132

Digital Library

[44]

Na Liu and Ruifeng Yu. 2017. Identifying design feature factors critical to acceptance and usage behavior of smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior 70 (2017), 131--142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.073

Digital Library

[45]

Andrés Lucero. 2015. Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2015, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 231--248.

Digital Library

[46]

Andrés Lucero, Peter Dalsgaard, Kim Halskov, and Jacob Buur. 2016. Designing with Cards. In Collaboration in Creative Design: Methods and Tools, Panos Markopoulos, Jean-Bernard Martens, Julian Malins, Karin Coninx, and Aggelos Liapis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 75--95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0{_}5

[47]

Caroline Lundqvist, Daniel Klinkhammer, Kim Halskov, Stefan Paul Feyer, Jeanette Falk Olesen, Nanna Inie, Harald Reiterer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2018. Physical, Digital, and Hybrid Setups Supporting Card-Based Collaborative Design Ideation. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 260--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240177

Digital Library

[48]

Craig MacEachern and İlhami Yildiz. 2018. Wind Energy. In Comprehensive Energy Systems, Ibrahim B T Comprehensive Energy Systems Dincer (Ed.). Elsevier, Oxford, 665--701. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809597-3.00118-8

[49]

Magazine Make. 2021. Make: Magazine. https://makezine.com/?s=energyharvesting

[50]

David A Mellis. 2014. Do-It-Yourself Fabrication of Electronic Devices. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13, 3 (2014), 22--29. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.45

[51]

Steven Nagels, Raf Ramakers, Kris Luyten, and Wim Deferme. 2018. Silicone Devices: A Scalable DIY Approach for Fabricating Self-Contained Multi-Layered Soft Circuits Using Microfluidics. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173762

Digital Library

[52]

Lorelli S Nowell, Jill M Norris, Deborah E White, and Nancy J Moules. 2017. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16, 1 (2017), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

[53]

Onder Ozgener. 2006. A small wind turbine system (SWTS) application and its performance analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 47, 11 (2006), 1326--1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.08.014

[54]

J A Paradiso and T Starner. 2005. Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4, 1 (2005), 18--27. https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2005.9

Digital Library

[55]

Jung Wook Park, Tingyu Cheng, Dingtian Zhang, Yuhui Zhao, Rosa I Arriaga, Thad Starner, Mohit Gupta, Yang Zhang, and Gregory D Abowd. 2022. Applying Compute-Proximal Energy Harvesting to Develop Self-Sustained Systems for Automobiles. IEEE Pervasive Computing 21, 1 (2022), 75--83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2021.3124738

[56]

Aman Parnami, Apurva Gupta, Gabriel Reyes, Ramik Sadana, Yang Li, and Gregory D Abowd. 2016. Mogeste: A Mobile Tool for In-Situ Motion Gesture Design. In Proceedings of the 8th Indian Conference on Human Computer Interaction (IHCI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3014362.3014365

Digital Library

[57]

Nadya Peek, James Coleman, Ilan Moyer, and Neil Gershenfeld. 2017. Cardboard Machine Kit: Modules for the Rapid Prototyping of Rapid Prototyping Machines. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3657--3668. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025491

Digital Library

[58]

Jonathan A Plucker and Ronald A Beghetto. 2004. Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. In Creativity: From potential to realization. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 153--167. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-009

[59]

Christian Remy, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Jonas Frich, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2020. Evaluating Creativity Support Tools in HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 457--476. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395474

Digital Library

[60]

Mitchel Resnick and Brian Silverman. 2005. Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 117--122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109556

Digital Library

[61]

Nina Reynolds and Salvador Ruiz de Maya. 2013. The impact of complexity and perceived difficulty on consumer revisit intentions. Journal of Marketing Management 29, 5-6 (2013), 625--645. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.774290

[62]

Raziel Riemer and Amir Shapiro. 2011. Biomechanical energy harvesting from human motion: theory, state of the art, design guidelines, and future directions. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 8, 1 (2011), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-8-22

[63]

Jeff Sauro and Joseph S Dumas. 2009. Comparison of Three One-Question, Post-Task Usability Questionnaires. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1599--1608. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518946

Digital Library

[64]

Daniel Schwartz, Baruch Fischhoff, Tamar Krishnamurti, and Fallaw Sowell. 2013. The Hawthorne effect and energy awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 38 (9 2013), 15242--15246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301687110

[65]

Brian Shackel. 2009. Usability - Context, Framework, Definition, Design and Evaluation. Interact. Comput. 21, 5-6 (12 2009), 339--346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2009.04.007

Digital Library

[66]

Ben Shneiderman. 2007. Creativity Support Tools: Accelerating Discovery and Innovation. Commun. ACM 50, 12 (12 2007), 20--32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689

Digital Library

[67]

Marcia J Simmering, Clay Posey, and Gabriele Piccoli. 2009. Computer Self-Efficacy and Motivation to Learn in a Self-Directed Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 7 (2009), 99--121.

[68]

Robert J. Sternberg. 2006. The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal 18, 1 (2006), 87--98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801{_}10

[69]

Vamsi Talla, Bryce Kellogg, Shyamnath Gollakota, and Joshua R Smith. 2017. Battery-Free Cellphone. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 2 (6 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3090090

Digital Library

[70]

Yen Kheng Tan and Sanjib Kumar Panda. 2010. Energy harvesting from hybrid indoor ambient light and thermal energy sources for enhanced performance of wireless sensor nodes. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58, 9 (2010), 4424--4435. Publisher: IEEE.

[71]

Theresa Jean Tanenbaum, Amanda M Williams, Audrey Desjardins, and Karen Tanenbaum. 2013. Democratizing Technology: Pleasure, Utility and Expressiveness in DIY and Maker Practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2603--2612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481360

Digital Library

[72]

W. TONG. 2010. Wind Power Generation and Wind Turbine Design. WIT Press, Southampton, UK. ISSN: 978-1-84564-205-1 Publication Title: WIT Press.

[73]

Thomas B. Ward and Yuliya Kolomyts. 2012. Cognition and Creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, 93--112. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511763205.008

[74]

Julia Woodward, Zari McFadden, Nicole Shiver, Amir Ben-hayon, Jason C Yip, and Lisa Anthony. 2018. Using Co-Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174149

Digital Library

[75]

Mohamed Y Zakaria, Daniel A Pereira, and Muhammad R Hajj. 2015. Experimental investigation and performance modeling of centimeter-scale micro-wind turbine energy harvesters. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 147 (2015), 58--65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.09.009

[76]

Dingtian Zhang, Jung Wook Park, Yang Zhang, Yuhui Zhao, Yiyang Wang, Yunzhi Li, Tanvi Bhagwat, Wen-Fang Chou, Xiaojia Jia, Bernard Kippelen, Canek Fuentes-Hernandez, Thad Starner, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2020. OptoSense: Towards Ubiquitous Self-Powered Ambient Light Sensing Surfaces. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (Sept. 2020), 103:1-103:27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411826

Digital Library

[77]

Yang Zhang, Yasha Iravantchi, Haojian Jin, Swarun Kumar, and Chris Harrison. 2019. Sozu: Self-Powered Radio Tags for Building-Scale Activity Sensing. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 973--985. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347952 event-place: New Orleans, LA, USA.

Digital Library

[78]

Kening Zhu and Shengdong Zhao. 2013. AutoGami: A Low-Cost Rapid Prototyping Toolkit for Automated Movable Paper Craft. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 661--670. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470748

Digital Library

Cited By

Nofshin ESwaroop SPan WMurphy SDoshi-Velez FDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Reinforcement Learning Interventions on Boundedly Rational Human Agents in Frictionful TasksProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663008(1482-1491)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663008
Xia CMin TZhang DWang C(2024)Understanding the Needs of Novice Developers in Creating Self-Powered IoTProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642576(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642576
Soyturk G(2024)Design and thermodynamic analysis of sustainable hybrid system based on solar tower and helium gas cycle for green hydrogen and ammonia productionSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments10.1016/j.seta.2024.10407772(104077)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104077

Index Terms

Exergy: A Toolkit to Simplify Creative Applications of Wind Energy Harvesting
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. Interactive systems and tools
      1. User interface toolkits
  2. Ubiquitous and mobile computing
    1. Empirical studies in ubiquitous and mobile computing
    2. Ubiquitous and mobile computing systems and tools

Recommendations

Energy Management in a Multi-Source Energy Harvesting IoT System

To guarantee the uninterrupted operation of an IoT node, IoT nodes are installed with energy harvesting techniques to prolong their lifetime and recharge their batteries. Mostly energy harvesting systems collect energy from sunlight and wind. However, ...
Uncovering opportunities for energy harvesting technologies: PhD forum abstract
SenSys '20: Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems

Many ubiquitous computing technologies have been developed, but we are not yet living in the world Mark Weiser envisioned---seamless integration of electronics into everyday objects. One of the reasons is that the systems being developed have various ...
Networking Low-Power Energy Harvesting Devices: Measurements and Algorithms

Recent advances in energy harvesting materials and ultra-low-power communications will soon enable the realization of networks composed of energy harvesting devices. These devices will operate using very low ambient energy, such as energy harvested from ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies Volume 7, Issue 1

March 2023

1243 pages

EISSN:2474-9567

DOI:10.1145/3589760

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 March 2023

Published in IMWUT Volume 7, Issue 1

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
671
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)270
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Nofshin ESwaroop SPan WMurphy SDoshi-Velez FDastani MSichman JAlechina NDignum V(2024)Reinforcement Learning Interventions on Boundedly Rational Human Agents in Frictionful TasksProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3663008(1482-1491)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3635637.3663008
Xia CMin TZhang DWang C(2024)Understanding the Needs of Novice Developers in Creating Self-Powered IoTProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642576(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642576
Soyturk G(2024)Design and thermodynamic analysis of sustainable hybrid system based on solar tower and helium gas cycle for green hydrogen and ammonia productionSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments10.1016/j.seta.2024.10407772(104077)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2024.104077

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents