[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Happiness and Fear: Using Emotions as a Lens to Disentangle How Users Felt About the Launch of Facebook Reactions

Published: 16 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In February 2016, Facebook launched Reactions, an interactive feature expanding the Like button to include five additional emotional responses: Love, Sadness, Anger, Wow, and Haha. In this article, we examine users’ feedback about this new feature and identify important design implications of this significant modification of Facebook's interface. We did this by applying theories of human emotion and emotion-specific influences on cognitive appraisals to conduct a heuristic evaluation of Facebook Reactions and a thematic content analysis of the 3,000 “top” comments posted by Facebook users on the official pre- and post-launch announcements about Reactions. Prior to launch, many users were concerned that the addition of a Dislike button would lead to abuse; thus, they favored the more nuanced design of Reactions. After launch, users were more positive about the feature as many of their misconceptions were clarified through actual use. Overall, we identified several design constraints of this new feature, including users’ inability to express conflicting emotions. We conclude the article by discussing the implications of our findings and the challenges around research and design for sociotechnical systems that involve complex human emotions.

References

[1]
Mousa Ahmadi, Mary E. Schneider, Rohit Kadam, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2016. Designing paralinguistic digital affordances for social support. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW’16 Companion), 221--224.
[2]
Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm, Dan Roth, and Richard Sproat. 2005. Emotions from text: Machine learning for text-based emotion prediction. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT’05), 579--586.
[3]
Ismail Badache and Mohand Boughanem. 2017. Emotional social signals for search ranking. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR’17), 1053--1056.
[4]
Francesco Barbieri, German Kruszewski, Francesco Ronzano, and Horacio Saggion. 2016. How cosmopolitan are emojis?: Exploring emojis usage and meaning over different languages with distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’16), 531--535.
[5]
Francesco Barbieri, Luis Marujo, Pradeep Karuturi, William Brendel, and Horacio Saggion. 2018. Exploring emoji usage and prediction through a temporal variation lens. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1805.00731.
[6]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[7]
Jacob Cohen. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 4 (1968), 213--220.
[8]
Josh Constine. 2015. Facebook is building an empathy button, not “dislike”. Here's How It Could Work. Retrieved September 22, 2015 from http://techcrunch.com/2015/09/15/the-sorry-button/#.ccth85:EQ58.
[9]
Henriette Cramer, Paloma de Juan, and Joel Tetreault. 2016. Sender-intended functions of emojis in US messaging. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI’16), 504--509.
[10]
Laurence Devillers, Laurence Vidrascu, and Lori Lamel. 2005. Challenges in real-life emotion annotation and machine learning based detection. Neural Networks 18, 4 (2005), 407--422.
[11]
Disney. 2016. The Emotions—Disney Wiki-Wikia. Retrieved May 23, 2016 from http://disney.wikia.com/wiki/The_Emotions.
[12]
Felicity Duncan. 2015. Thank an Aging Population for Facebook's Proposed “Dislike” Button. Retrieved September 22, 2015 from http://gizmodo.com/thank-an-aging-population-for-facebooks-proposed-dislik-1732018970.
[13]
Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion 6, 3--4 (1992), 169--200.
[14]
Paul Ekman. 1999. Basic emotions. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion, 45--60.
[15]
Paul Ekman and Daniel Cordaro. 2011. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review 3, 4 (2011), 364--370.
[16]
Nicole B. Ellison, Jessica Vitak, Rebecca Gray, and Cliff Lampe. 2014. Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 4 (2014), 855--870.
[17]
Facebook. 2016. Company Info|Facebook Newsroom. Retrieved May 23, 2016 from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/.
[18]
Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2008. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE 5, 1 (2008) 80--92.
[19]
Carolin Gerlitz and Anne Helmond. 2013. The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media 8 Society 15, 8 (2013), 1348--1365.
[20]
Kilem L. Gwet. 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 4th Edition: The Definitive Guide to Measuring The Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Advanced Analytics, LLC.
[21]
Rebecca A. Hayes, Caleb T. Carr, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2016. One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting 8 Electronic Media 60, 1 (2016), 171--187.
[22]
Paul Heymann, Georgia Koutrika, and Hector Garcia-Molina. 2008. Can social bookmarking improve web search? In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’08), 195--206.
[23]
Carroll E. Izard. 2013. Human Emotions. Springer Science 8 Business Media.
[24]
Rachael E. Jack, Oliver G. B. Garrod, and Philippe G. Schyns. 2014. Dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hierarchy of signals over time. Current Biology 24, 2 (2014), 187--192.
[25]
Richard S. Lazarus. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
[26]
Richard S. Lazarus. 2000. Toward Better Research on Stress and Coping. Retrieved January 10, 2017 from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/55/6/665/.
[27]
Richard S. Lazarus and Susan Folkman. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en8lr=8id=i-ySQQuUpr8C8oi=fnd8pg=PR58dq=Stress,+Appraisal,+and+Coping.8ots=DeJQlnhdNf8sig=SOOWzzQu5BfIdi3encoqjntYA1M.
[28]
Jennifer S. Lerner and Dacher Keltner. 2000. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion 14, 4 (2000), 473--493.
[29]
Hannah Jean Miller, Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2016. “Blissfully happy” or “ready to fight”: Varying interpretations of emoji. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Retrieved November 23, 2018 from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13167.
[30]
Jakob Nielsen. 1992. Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’92), 373--380.
[31]
Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’94), 152--158.
[32]
Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’90), 249--256.
[33]
Marret K. Noordewier and Seger M. Breugelmans. 2013. On the valence of surprise. Cognition 8 Emotion 27, 7 (2013), 1326--1334.
[34]
Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 2, 1--2, 1--135.
[35]
Chris Pool and Malvina Nissim. 2016. Distant supervision for emotion detection using Facebook reactions. Arxiv:1611.02988 [cs]. Retrieved September 13, 2017 from http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.02988.
[36]
Monica A. Riordan. 2017. Emojis as tools for emotion work: Communicating affect in text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36, 5 (2017), 549--567.
[37]
Barry Schwartz. 2004. The tyranny of choice. Scientific American 290, 4 (2004), 70--75.
[38]
Lauren Scissors, Moira Burke, and Steven Wengrovitz. 2016. What's in a Like?: Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’16), 1501--1510.
[39]
Pan Shi, Heng Xu, and Yunan Chen. 2013. Using contextual integrity to examine interpersonal information boundary on social network sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13), 35--38.
[40]
Ben Shneiderman. 1997. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA.
[41]
Karianne Skovholt, Anette Grønning, and Anne Kankaanranta. 2014. The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails: :-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 4 (2014), 780--797.
[42]
Slack. Use Emoji and Emoticons. Slack Help Center. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://slack.com/help/articles/202931348-Use-emoji-and-emoticons.
[43]
Luke Stark and Kate Crawford. 2015. The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication. Social Media + Society 1, 2 2056305115604853.
[44]
Geoff Teehan. 2016. Reactions: Not Everything in Life is Likable. Medium. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://medium.com/facebook-design/reactions-not-everything-in-life-is-likable-5c403de72a3f.
[45]
Thankam Paul Thyvalikakath, Valerie Monaco, Himabindu Thambuganipalle, and Titus Schleyer. 2009. Comparative study of heuristic evaluation and usability testing methods. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 143 (2009), 322--327.
[46]
Ye Tian, Thiago Galery, Giulio Dulcinati, Emilia Molimpakis, and Chao Sun. 2017. Facebook sentiment: Reactions and emojis. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, 11--16. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-1102
[47]
M. Tory and T. Moller. 2005. Evaluating visualizations: Do expert reviews work? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 25, 5 (2005), 8--11.
[48]
Jessica L. Tracy and Daniel Randles. 2011. Four models of basic emotions: A review of Ekman and Cordaro, Izard, Levenson, and Panksepp and Watt. Emotion Review 3, 4 (2011), 397--405.
[49]
Jessica Vitak, Katie Shilton, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2016. Beyond the Belmont principles: Ethical challenges, practices, and beliefs in the online data research community. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’16), 941--953.
[50]
Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, and Yunan Chen. 2014. Understanding user adaptation strategies for the launching of Facebook timeline. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14), 2421--2430.
[51]
Pamela Wisniewski, Heng Xu, Mary Beth Rosson, Daniel F. Perkins, and John M. Carroll. 2016. Dear diary: Teens reflect on their weekly online risk experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3919--3930.
[52]
Saijing Zheng, Pan Shi, Heng Xu, and Cheng Zhang. 2012. Launching the new profile on Facebook: Understanding the triggers and outcomes of users’ privacy concerns. In Trust and Trustworthy Computing, Stefan Katzenbeisser, Edgar Weippl, L. Jean Camp, Melanie Volkamer, Mike Reiter, and Xinwen Zhang (eds.). Springer, Berlin, 325--339.
[53]
Michael Zimmer. 2016. OkCupid Study Reveals the Perils of Big-Data Science. WIRED. Retrieved February 7, 2017 from https://www.wired.com/2016/05/okcupid-study-reveals-perils-big-data-science/.
[54]
Mark Zuckerberg. 2016. Introducing Reactions. Retrieved May 23, 2016 from http://www.facebook.com/zuck.
[55]
Help Center. Retrieved May 25, 2016 from https://www.facebook.com/help/539680519386145.
[56]
Reaction Packs for Facebook. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/reaction-packs-for-facebo/djcfkadjljnkkbojdgocopcbdbnmpcan.
[57]
Facebook Won't be Bringing Back the Pride Reaction Emoji. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/06/04/facebook-pride-reaction-emoji-dropped/.
[58]
LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count). Retrieved January 16, 2020 from https://liwc.wpengine.com/.
[59]
Chi-squared test of independence - Handbook of Biological Statistics. Retrieved January 16, 2020 from http://www.biostathandbook.com/chiind.html.
[60]
Facebook—Facebook Q2 2020 Earnings. Retrieved August 6, 2020 from https://investor.fb.com/investor-events/event-details/2020/Facebook-Q2-2020-Earnings-/default.aspx.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Gender-Based Analysis of User Reactions to Facebook PostsBig Data Mining and Analytics10.26599/BDMA.2023.90200057:1(75-86)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)Negative Peer Feedback and User Content Generation: Evidence From a Restaurant Review PlatformProduction and Operations Management10.1177/10591478231224941Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2024)On the Design Risks of Empathy FatigueProceedings of the 3rd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop: Scrutinizing Empathy Beyond the Individual10.1145/3661790.3661798(34-39)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Happiness and Fear: Using Emotions as a Lens to Disentangle How Users Felt About the Launch of Facebook Reactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Social Computing
    ACM Transactions on Social Computing  Volume 3, Issue 4
    December 2020
    144 pages
    EISSN:2469-7826
    DOI:10.1145/3426976
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 October 2020
    Accepted: 01 July 2020
    Revised: 01 January 2020
    Received: 01 November 2018
    Published in TSC Volume 3, Issue 4

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Facebook Reactions
    2. emotion
    3. heuristic evaluation
    4. social media
    5. sociotechnical design

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Gender-Based Analysis of User Reactions to Facebook PostsBig Data Mining and Analytics10.26599/BDMA.2023.90200057:1(75-86)Online publication date: Mar-2024
    • (2024)Negative Peer Feedback and User Content Generation: Evidence From a Restaurant Review PlatformProduction and Operations Management10.1177/10591478231224941Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
    • (2024)On the Design Risks of Empathy FatigueProceedings of the 3rd Empathy-Centric Design Workshop: Scrutinizing Empathy Beyond the Individual10.1145/3661790.3661798(34-39)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Affective Design: The Influence of Facebook Reactions on the Emotional Expression of the 114th US CongressProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641935(1-9)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)"Thoughts & Prayers" or " ❤️ & 🙏 ": How the Release of New Reactions on CaringBridge Reshapes Supportive Communication in Health CrisesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100357:CSCW2(1-39)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Do symbol and device matter? The effects of symbol choice of fake news flags and device on human interaction with fake news on social media platformsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2023.107704144(107704)Online publication date: Jul-2023
    • (2022)The Use of Negative Interface Cues to Change Perceptions of Online Retributive HarassmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35552266:CSCW2(1-23)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (undefined)Any Feedback is Welcome: Peer Feedback and User Behavior on Digital PlatformsSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4009873

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media