More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

abstract

Defining Usability Problems

Authors:

Pavel Manakhov,

Vyacheslav D. IvanovAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 3144 - 3151

https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892387

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Usability evaluation methods rely, either explicitly or implicitly, on a definition of a usability problem to specify an evaluation scope and a usability problem report format. However, the majority of definitions are vague or fail to capture all relevant phenomena in the scope of human-computer interaction. This paper proposes the elaborate definition of a usability problem to address theoretical issues and guide a problem analysis strategy for various evaluation methods.

References

[1]

Gilbert Cockton. 2013. Usability Evaluation. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.), Mads Soegaard and Rilke F. Dam (Eds.). Aarhus, Denmark 817--940.

[2]

Anind K. Dey. 2001. Understanding and Using Context. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 1 (January 2001), 4--7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007790170019

Digital Library

[3]

Joseph S. Dumas and Beth A. Loring. 2008. Moderating Usability Tests: Principles and Practices for Interacting (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.

Digital Library

[4]

Joseph S. Dumas and Janice C. Redish. 1999. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing (1st ed.). Intellect Books, Exeter, UK.

Digital Library

[5]

Wayne D. Gray and Marilyn C. Salzman. 1998. Damaged merchandise-a review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. Hum.Comput. Interact. 13, 3 (September 1998), 203261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1303_2

Digital Library

[6]

Erik Hollnagel. 1993. The phenotype of erroneous actions. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 39, 1 (July 1993), 1--32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1051

Digital Library

[7]

Jonathan Howarth, Terence S. Andre, and Rex Hartson. 2007. A structured process for transforming usability data into usability information. J. Usability Studies 3, 1 (November 2007), 7--23.

Digital Library

[8]

ISO 9241--11:1998, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -Part 11: Guidance on usability.

[9]

ISO 9241--110:2006, Ergonomics of human-system interaction -- Part 110: Dialogue principles.

[10]

Robin Jeffries, James R. Miller, Cathleen Wharton, and Kathy Uyeda. 1991. User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '91), Scott P. Robertson, Gary M. Olson, and Judith S. Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 119--124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/108844.108862

Digital Library

[11]

Robin Jeffries. 1994. Usability problem reports: helping evaluators communicate effectively with developers. In Usability inspection methods, Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA 273--294.

Digital Library

[12]

Michael J. Kahn and Amanda Prail. 1994. Formal usability inspections. In Usability inspection methods, Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA 141171.

Digital Library

[13]

Claire-Marie Karat, Robert Campbell, and Tarra Fiegel. 1992. Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92), Penny Bauersfeld, John Bennett, and Gene Lynch (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 397--404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142750.142873

Digital Library

[14]

Darryn Lavery, Gilbert Cockton, and Malcolm P. Atkinson. 1997. Comparison of evaluation methods using structured usability problem reports. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16:4--5, 246266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014492997119824

[15]

Robert L. Mack and Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Executive summary. In Usability inspection methods, Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA 1--23.

Digital Library

[16]

Robert Mack and Frank Montaniz. 1994. Observing, predicting, and analyzing usability problems. In Usability inspection methods, Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack (Eds.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA 295--339.

Digital Library

[17]

Jeffrey Rubin and Dana Chisnell. 2008. Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design and conduct effective tests (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Digital Library

Cited By

Yigitbas EWitalinski IGottschalk SEngels G(2023)Virtual Reality Collaboration Platform for Agile Software DevelopmentProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_1(3-19)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_1
Capy SOsorio PHagane SAznar CGarcin DCoronado EDeuff DOcnarescu IMilleville IVenture G(2022)Yōkobo: A Robot to Strengthen Links Amongst Users with Non-Verbal BehavioursMachines10.3390/machines1008070810:8(708)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080708
Yigitbas EGorissen SWeidmann NEngels G(2022)Design and evaluation of a collaborative UML modeling environment in virtual realitySoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-022-01065-222:5(1397-1425)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-022-01065-2
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Defining Usability Problems
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods

Usability evaluation methods (UEMs) are widely recognised as an essential part of systems development. Assessments of the performance of UEMs, however, have been criticised for low validity and limited reliability. The present study extends this ...
Evaluating the Usability of Interactive Digital Television Applications
ITNG '13: Proceedings of the 2013 10th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations

The evaluation of the usability of an interactive system is one of the most important steps in the user-centered design approach. Usability evaluation methods are quite diverse and many of them may be used to evaluate Interactive Digital Television (iTV)...
A structured process for transforming usability data into usability information

Much research has been devoted to developing usability evaluation methods that are used in evaluating interaction designs. More recently, however, research has shifted away from evaluation methods and comparisons of evaluation methods to issues of how ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2016

3954 pages

ISBN:9781450340823

DOI:10.1145/2851581

General Chairs:
Jofish Kaye
Yahoo
,
Allison Druin
University of Maryland / National Park Service
,
Program Chairs:
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan
,
Dan Morris
Microsoft
,
Juan Pablo Hourcade
University of Iowa

Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Conference

CHI'16

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 7 - 12, 2016

California, San Jose, USA

Acceptance Rates

CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 5,000 submissions, 20%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
454
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)17
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yigitbas EWitalinski IGottschalk SEngels G(2023)Virtual Reality Collaboration Platform for Agile Software DevelopmentProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_1(3-19)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-49266-2_1
Capy SOsorio PHagane SAznar CGarcin DCoronado EDeuff DOcnarescu IMilleville IVenture G(2022)Yōkobo: A Robot to Strengthen Links Amongst Users with Non-Verbal BehavioursMachines10.3390/machines1008070810:8(708)Online publication date: 18-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10080708
Yigitbas EGorissen SWeidmann NEngels G(2022)Design and evaluation of a collaborative UML modeling environment in virtual realitySoftware and Systems Modeling10.1007/s10270-022-01065-222:5(1397-1425)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-022-01065-2
Salman HWan Ahmad WSulaiman S(2022)A design framework of a smartphone user interface for elderly usersUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-021-00856-622:2(489-509)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00856-6
Rochon LKarran ABouvier FCoursaris CSénécal SDelisle JLéger P(2021)Improving Learnability Capabilities in Desktop VR Medical ApplicationsHCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: Multimodality, eXtended Reality, and Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-030-90963-5_24(318-336)Online publication date: 24-Jul-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-90963-5_24
Darin TAndrade RMerabet LSánchez JMark GFussell SLampe Cschraefel mHourcade JAppert CWigdor D(2017)Investigating the Mode in Multimodal Video GamesProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3027063.3053177(2487-2495)Online publication date: 6-May-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3027063.3053177

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents