[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

Determinants of Intention to Use Local E-Government Services in Ghana: The Perspective of Local Government Workers

Published: 01 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate factors determining the intention to adopt and use local e-government services in Ghana. A research questionnaire was administered to potential respondents in Municipal, Metropolitan and District Assemblies MMDAs. The data was analyzed with SPSS while the Technology Acceptance Model TAM was used as the theoretical framework for this study. The results demonstrated that, apart from education, demographic factors such as age and gender were all significant and have a direct impact on intention to use local e-government services. Predictors such as perceived ease of use, perceived service quality, and trust were also found to be significant in influencing the use of local e-government services but interestingly, computer self-efficacy has no significant impact on the intention to use local e-government services. The implications of these findings on local e-government implementation are further discussed.

References

[1]
Ajzen, I. 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior Action control pp. 11-39. Springer.
[2]
Al-Jamal, N. Q., & Abu-Shanab, E. A. 2015. E-Government adoption in Jordan: The influence of age. Paper presented at the ICIT 2015 the 7th International Conference on Information Technology.
[3]
Al-Otaibi, M., & Al-Zahrani, R. 2009. Electronic commerce in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Research paper. King Saud University, KSA, 1-27.
[4]
Al-Sobhi, F., Weerakkody, V., & Mustafa Kamal, M. 2010. An exploratory study on the role of intermediaries in delivering public services in Madinah City: Case of Saudi Arabia. Transforming Government: People . Process and Policy, 41, 14-36.
[5]
Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Simintiras, A. C. 2016. Jordanian consumers' adoption of telebanking: Influence of perceived usefulness, trust and self-efficacy. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 345, 690-709.
[6]
AlAwadhi, S., & Morris, A. 2008. The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-government Services in Kuwait. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[7]
Alfalah, A., Choudrie, J., & Spencer, N. 2017. Older Adults Adoption, Use and Diffusion of E-Government Services in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A Quantitative Study.
[8]
Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. 2014. Towards a comprehensive model for e-Government adoption and utilisation analysis: The case of Saudi Arabia. Paper presented at the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems FedCSIS.
[9]
Alghamdi, S., & Beloff, N. 2016. Innovative Framework for e-Government adoption in Saudi Arabia: A Study from the business sector perspective. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 71, 655-664.
[10]
Almahamid, S., Mcadams, A. C., Al Kalaldeh, T., & Al-Sa'eed, M. t. 2010. The relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived information quality, and intention to use e-government. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 111, 30-44.
[11]
Alrawi, K. W., & Sabry, K. A. 2009. E-commerce evolution: A Gulf region review. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 45, 509-526.
[12]
Alshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. 2012. The Impact of Trust on E-Government Services Acceptance: A Study of Users' Perceptions by Applying UTAUT Model. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 32, 50-61.
[13]
Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J., & Swan, J. E. 1996. SERVQUAL revisited: A critical review of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 106, 62-81.
[14]
Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action. New York: Prentice-hall.
[15]
Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. 2004. Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 201, 1-15.
[16]
Belanger, F., & Carter, L. 2006. The Effects of the Digital Divide on E-Government: An Empirical Evaluation. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS '06.
[17]
Birch, D. 2002. Local e-government: A survey of local authorities. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
[18]
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 151, 5-25.
[19]
Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. 2016. Citizen adoption of e-government Services: Exploring citizen perceptions of online services in the United States and United Kingdom. Information Systems Management, 332, 124-140.
[20]
Chan, F. T., & Yee-Loong Chong, A. 2013. Analysis of the determinants of consumers' m-commerce usage activities. Online Information Review, 373, 443-461.
[21]
Chen, Z., Gangopadhyay, A., Holden, S. H., Karabatis, G., & McGuire, M. P. 2007. Semantic integration of government data for water quality management. Government Information Quarterly, 244, 716-735.
[22]
Chong, A. Y.-L. 2013. Mobile commerce usage activities: The roles of demographic and motivation variables. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 807, 1350-1359.
[23]
Chun-Mei, C., Hsiao, H.-C., Chien-Hua, S., & Su-Chang, C. 2010. Analysis of factors in technological and vocational school teachers' perceived organizational innovative climate and continuous use of e-teaching: Using computer self-efficacy as an intervening variable. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 94.
[24]
Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. 2001. E-governance and smart communities: A social learning challenge. Social Science Computer Review, 191, 80-93.
[25]
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 192, 189-211.
[26]
Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. 2008. Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 683, 523-536.
[27]
Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 133, 319-340.
[28]
Diatmika, I. W. B., Irianto, G., & Baridwan, Z. 2016. Determinants of Behavior Intention Of Accounting Information Systems Based Information Technology Acceptance. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 28.
[29]
El-Masri, M., & Tarhini, A. 2017. Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning systems in Qatar and USA: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 UTAUT2. Educational Technology Research and Development.
[30]
Eriksson, K., Kerem, K., & Nilsson, D. 2005. Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 232, 200-216.
[31]
Fedotova, O., Teixeira, L., & Alvelos, H. 2015. Citizens' Engagement Using Communication Technologies Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology 3rd ed., pp. 2709-2718. IGI Global.
[32]
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
[33]
Fox, W. F., & Gurley-Calvez, T. 2006. Will consolidation improve sub-national governments?
[34]
Gallego-Álvarez, I., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. 2010. Are determining factors of municipal E-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 274, 423-430.
[35]
Guriting, P., & Oly Ndubisi, N. 2006. Borneo online banking: Evaluating customer perceptions and behavioural intention. Management Research News, 291/2, 6-15.
[36]
Haider, Z., Shuwen, C., Lalani, F., & Mangi, A. A. 2015. Adoption of e-Government in Pakistan: Supply perspective. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6, 55-63.
[37]
Kaaya, J. 2004. Implementing e-government services in East Africa: Assessing status through content analysis of government websites. Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 21, 39-54.
[38]
Kim, P. S., Halligan, J., Cho, N., Oh, C. H., & Eikenberry, A. M. 2005. Toward participatory and transparent governance: Report on the sixth global forum on reinventing government. Public Administration Review, 656, 646-654.
[39]
Komba, M. M., & Lwoga, E. T. 2015. Government information seeking behaviour of citizens in selected districts of Tanzania. International Research . Journal of Library and Information Science, 54.
[40]
La Porte, T. M., Demchak, C. C., & De Jong, M. 2002. Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Administration & Society, 344, 411-446.
[41]
Layne, K., & Lee, J. 2001. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 182, 122-136.
[42]
Lewis, B. R., & Mitchell, V. W. 1990. Defining and measuring the quality of customer service. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 86, 11-17.
[43]
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. 2007. Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 482, 301-317.
[44]
Lu, N. L., & Nguyen, V. T. 2016. Online Tax Filing-E-Government Service Adoption Case of Vietnam. Modern Economy, 712, 1498-1504.
[45]
Malik, B. H., Shuqin, C., Mastoi, A. G., Gul, N., & Gul, H. 2016. Evaluating Citizen e-Satisfaction from e-Government Services: A Case of Pakistan. European Scientific Journal, 125.
[46]
Mauro, C., Hernandez, J., & Afonso Mazzon, J. 2007. Adoption of internet banking: Proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 252, 72-88.
[47]
Meftah, M., Gharleghi, B., & Samadi, B. 2015. Adoption of E-government among Bahraini citizens. Asian Social Science, 114, 141.
[48]
Mensah, I. K., Jianing, M., & Durrani, D. K. 2017. Factors Influencing Citizens' Intention to Use E-Government Services: A Case Study of South Korean Students in China. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 131, 14-32.
[49]
Miller, K. 2002. Advantages and disadvantages of local government decentralization. Paper presented at the Presentation to the Caribbean conference on 'Local Government and Decentralization', Ocean International Hotel, Georgetown Guyana.
[50]
Mofleh, S. I., & Wanous, M. 2008. Understanding factors influencing citizens' adoption of e-government services in the developing world: Jordan as a case study. INFOCOMP Journal of Computer Science, 72, 1-11.
[51]
Mwangakala, H., & Mvungi, N. H. 2011. Toward E-Government: Factors Affecting Utilisation of Government Websites.
[52]
Nam, T. 2012. Citizens' attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 782, 346-368.
[53]
Nurdin, N., Stockdale, R., & Scheepers, H. 2012. Benchmarking Indonesian local e-government. Benchmarking, 7, 15-2012.
[54]
O'Donnell, O., & Humphreys, P. C. 2003. 25. E-Government and the Decentralisation of Service Delivery Vol. 25. Institute of Public Administration.
[55]
Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. 2008. Individual characteristics and computer self-efficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers & Education, 503, 1084-1091.
[56]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. 2005. ES-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 73, 213-233.
[57]
Rabaa'i, A. A. 2017. The use of UTAUT to investigate the adoption of e-government in Jordan: A cultural perspective. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 243, 285-315.
[58]
Rahman, H. 2009. Handbook of Research on E-Government Readiness for Information and Service Exchange: Utilizing Progressive Information Communication Technologies: Utilizing Progressive Information Communication Technologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[59]
Rhee, K. Y., & Kim, W. B. 2004. The adoption and use of the Internet in South Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 94.
[60]
Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: 4 Free Press.
[61]
Sá, F., Rocha, Á., & Cota, M. P. 2016. Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model. Telematics and Informatics, 332, 270-276.
[62]
Sciadas, G. 2002. The digital divide in Canada. Canadian Economic Observer, 1511.
[63]
Simsek, A. 2011. The relationship between computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. Online Submission, 23, 177-187.
[64]
Smith, A. G. 2001. Applying evaluation criteria to New Zealand government websites. International Journal of Information Management, 212, 137-149.
[65]
Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. 2004. A framework for electronic government: evolution, enablers and resource drainers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eighth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
[66]
Susanto, T. D., & Goodwin, R. 2010. Factors influencing citizen adoption of SMS-Based e-Government Services. Electronic . Journal of E-Government, 81.
[67]
Tan, C. W., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. 2008. Building citizen trust towards e-government services: do high quality websites matter? Paper presented at the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[68]
Timothy, T. 2009. Examining the relationship between student teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and their intended uses of technology for teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 84.
[69]
Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. 2005. Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 144, 417-440.
[70]
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 273, 451-481.
[71]
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 462, 186-204.
[72]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 425-478.
[73]
Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. 2005. Factors influencing the adoption of Thai eGovernment websites: information quality and system quality approach. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eBusiness.
[74]
Wangpipatwong, S., Chutimaskul, W., & Papasratorn, B. 2008. Understanding citizen's continuance intention to use e-government website: A composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacy. The electronic journal of e-government, 61, 55-64.
[75]
Watson, R. T., & Mundy, B. 2001. A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM, 441, 27-30.
[76]
Welch, E. W., & Hinnant, C. C. 2003. Internet use, transparency, and interactivity effects on trust in government. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
[77]
Wirtz, B. W., & Kurtz, O. T. 2016. Local e-government and user satisfaction with city portals-the citizens' service preference perspective. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 133, 265-287.
[78]
Wisniewski, M. 1996. Measuring service quality in the public sector: The potential for SERVQUAL. Total Quality Management, 74, 357-366.
[79]
Yildiz, M. 2009. An overview of local E-government adoption and implementation in Turkey. In Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-Government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies pp. 419-436. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
[80]
Zhao, F., & Khan, M. S. 2013. An empirical study of e-government service adoption: Culture and behavioral intention. International Journal of Public Administration, 3610, 710-722.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Impact of Power Distance and Uncertainty Avoidance on the Adoption of Electronic Government ServicesInternational Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications10.4018/IJESMA.202007010112:3(1-17)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  • (2020)Exploring the Moderating Effect of Perceived Usefulness on the Adoption of E-Government ServicesInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.201901010215:1(17-35)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
  1. Determinants of Intention to Use Local E-Government Services in Ghana: The Perspective of Local Government Workers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image International Journal of Technology Diffusion
    International Journal of Technology Diffusion  Volume 9, Issue 2
    April 2018
    85 pages
    ISSN:1947-9301
    EISSN:1947-931X
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    IGI Global

    United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 April 2018

    Author Tags

    1. E-Government
    2. Local E-Government Services
    3. Local Government
    4. Technology Acceptance Model TAM

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2020)Impact of Power Distance and Uncertainty Avoidance on the Adoption of Electronic Government ServicesInternational Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications10.4018/IJESMA.202007010112:3(1-17)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020
    • (2020)Exploring the Moderating Effect of Perceived Usefulness on the Adoption of E-Government ServicesInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research10.4018/IJEGR.201901010215:1(17-35)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2020

    View Options

    View options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media