More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Experts’ Judgment for Evaluation of an E-Learning Entrepreneurship Course in Higher Education

Authors:

May Portuguez Castro,

Marcela Georgina Gómez ZermeñoAuthors Info & Claims

TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)

Pages 634 - 639

https://doi.org/10.1145/3486011.3486530

Published: 20 December 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Today's education is in accelerated digital transformation, mainly promoted by the crisis with COVID-19. Face-to-face courses have had to be switched to virtual mode without many educational institutions being fully prepared for this change, which causes problems, especially with the quality of the courses offered. Therefore, strategies should emerge to evaluate the use of Information Technologies (ICTs) in education. One of these methodologies is expert judgment, so this work aims to present an assessment of an e-learning entrepreneurship course conducted by nine experts at a university in Mexico to analyze whether the course proposal was appropriate to achieve students' learning objectives. The results obtained showed that the course activities are appropriate for fulfilling the proposed objectives and the structure and variety of content were suitable for fostering the entrepreneurial spirit in students. It is considered that educational institutions can use this strategy to evaluate courses before implementation by experienced professionals in the study taking into consideration the current requirements caused by COVID-19 and that will remain with its effects for a more prolonged period.

References

[1]

Dahlan Nariman. 2021. Impact of the Interactive e-learning Instructions on Effectiveness of a Programming Course. In Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems. CISIS 2020, vol 1194, L. Barolli, A. Poniszewska-Maranda and T. Enokido, Eds. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50454-0_61

[2]

Julio Cabero Almenara and J. Ruiz Palmero. 2017. Technologies of Information and Communication for inclusion: reformulating the “digital gap” [Las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación para la inclusión: reformulando la brecha digital”]. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation (IJERI), 9, 16-30. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6182959

[3]

Marcela Gómez-Zermeño, Lorena Alemán de la Garza, May Portuguez Castro and Manuel Medina Labrador. 2019. Systematic Literature Review: Development And Use of Technologies in Education [Revisión sistemática de literatura: Desarrollo y uso de tecnologías en la educación]. In Educational innovation: research and trends [Innovación educativa: investigación y tendencias], María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Ricardo Valenzuela González. Eds. Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro.

[4]

Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses, Esther Fernández Márquez and Cristóbal Ballesteros Regaña. 2018. The New Virtual Environments Of Lifelong Learning (MOOC) And Their Educational Possibilities In Social And Educational Scenarios. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 53, 179-192.

[5]

Amelie Dorn, Eveline Wandl-Vogt, Anna Romano, Thomas Jekel, and Anna Gawin. 2020. Evaluating Effectiveness Of Innovative Education Formats For 21st Century Skills: The Example of DaVinciLab YouthHackathon Workshops 2019/2020. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436671

Digital Library

[6]

Kiomi Matsumoto-Royo and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2020. Teaching and Assessment Strategies In A Practice-Based Teacher Education Program. Instrument Validation. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21– 23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436557

Digital Library

[7]

May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Georgina Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Educational Innovation Supported by ICT to Identify Entrepreneurial Skills in Students in Higher Education. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436556

Digital Library

[8]

María José Rodríguez-Conde, Susana Olmos-Migueláñez, Adriana Gamazo, José Carlos Sánchez-Prieto, and Joe O'Hara. 2020. Challenges in Evaluation in Education and Guidance: A Perspective from 2020. In Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), October 21–23, 2020, Salamanca, Spain. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436715

Digital Library

[9]

Adriana Valencia Álvarez and Valenzuela González. 2017. Disruptive Innovation, Systematic Innovation and Continuous Improvement Processes… Do They Imply Different Competencies to Develop? In Educational innovation: Research, training, linking and visibility, María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Ricardo Valenzuela González, Eds., Madrid: Síntesis, 2017.

[10]

Neil Anderson, Kristina Potočnik and Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and Creativity in Organizations. A State-Of-The Science Review, Prospective Commentary, And Guiding Framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128

[11]

Gabriele Faßauer. 2018. Linking Deviation with Innovation: Behavioral Effects Of Management Control Through The Lens Of A Theory Of Deviance. Journal of Management Control, 29, 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-00271-8

[12]

OCDE/CERI. 2010. Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy: A Systemic Approach To Technology-Based School Innovation. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

[13]

Manuel Baltodano and Marcela. Gómez Zermeño. 2017. Pedagogical, Curricular and Didactic Element Involved in The Creation Of An E-Learning Environment: The Case Of A Costa Rican University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18, 104-118. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340396

[14]

Esteban Vázquez-Cano, Eloy López Meneses and Alicia Jaén Martínez. 2017. A. The Group E-Portfolio to Improve Teaching Learning Process at University. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13, 65-76. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1221

[15]

Mahmudul Hasan, Eijaz Khan and Noor Un Nabi. 2017. Entrepreneurial Education at University Level And Entrepreneurship Development. Education + Training, 59, 888-906. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2016-0020

[16]

Siti Roffeei, Farra Yusop, and Yusniza Kamarulzaman. 2018. Determinants of Innovation Culture amongst Higher Education Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(4), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol5no4.1

[17]

María José Alcalá del Olmo and José David Gutiérrez Sánchez. 2020. Sustainable Development as A Pedagogical Challenge For The 21st Century University. Anduli, 19, 59-80.

[18]

Cheonjae Lee and Walter Timo de Vries. 2019. Sustaining a Culture of Excellence: Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Land Management. Sustainability, 11(12), 3280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123280

[19]

James Phelan. 2015. The Use of ELearning in Social Work Education. Social Work, 60(3), 257–264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24881489

[20]

Shirley Cherry and Bethany Flora. 2017. Radiography Faculty Engaged in Online Education: Perceptions of Effectiveness, Satisfaction, And Technological Self-Efficacy. Radiologic Technology, 88, 249–262. https:// .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28298576/

[21]

John Huss, Orly Sela and Shannon Eastep. 2015. A Case Study of Online Instructors and Their Quest for Greater Interactivity In Their Courses: Overcoming The Distance In Distance Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.5

[22]

Laura Racovita-Szilagyi, Domingo Carbonero Muñoz and Mioara Diaconu. 2018. Challenges and Opportunities to Elearning In Social Work Education: Perspectives from Spain and the United States. European Journal of Social Work, 21(6), 836-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1461066

[23]

Mauro Marino-Jiménez 2016. E-Learning Design: Seven Essential Components For A Communication Course In The University Context. Revista Q, 10 (20), 24-51. https://doi.org/10.18566/revistaq.v10n20.a02

[24]

Pablo Rivera Vargas, Cristina Alonso Cano and Juana Sancho Gil. 2017. From Distance Education To E-Learning: Emergence, Evolution and Consolidation. Revista Educación y Tecnología, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18566/revistaq.v10n20.a02

[25]

Lorena Alemán de la Garza, Marcela Gómez-Zermeño, Yoko Mochizuki and Éric Bruillard 2019. Rethinking Pedagoy. Exploring the Potential of Digital Technology In Achieving Quality Education. New Delhi: UNESCO MGIEP.

[26]

May Portuguez Castro and M. Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Challenge Based Learning: Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainability through e-learning in Higher Education. Sustainability, 12(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063

[27]

Papia Bawa. 2016. Retention in Online Courses: Exploring Issues and Solutions—A Literature Review. SAGE Open, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621777

[28]

Valentina Arkorful and Nelly Abaidoo. 2015. The Role Of E-Learning, Advantages and Disadvantages Of Its Adoption In Higher Education. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(12), 29-44. https://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/December-2014/34.pdf

[29]

Francisco García-Peñalvo and Antonio Seoane Pardo. An Updated Review of The Concept of Elearning Tenth Anniversary. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2015161119144

[30]

Jennifer Iriti, William Bickel, Christian Schunn and Mary Kei Stein. 2016. Maximizing Research and Development Resources: Identifying and Testing “Load-Bearing Conditions” For Educational Technology Innovations. Educational Technology Research & Development, 64, 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9409-2

[31]

Iván Claros, Ruth Cobos and César Collazos. 2016. An approach based on social network analysis applied to a collaborative learning experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2015.2453979

[32]

José López Islas. 2017. Institutional Indicators to Measure Innovation. In Educational Innovation: Research, Training, Linking And Visibility, María Soledad Ramírez Montoya and Jaime Ricardo Valenzuela González. Madrid: Síntesis.

[33]

OCDE. 2016. Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.

[34]

Jennifer Lai and Matt Bower. 2019. How Is the Use of Technology in Education Evaluated? A Systematic Review. Computer & Education, 133, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010

[35]

Julio Cabero Almenara. 2013. The Application Of Expert Judgment As A Technique For Evaluating Information And Communication Technologies (ICT). Revista de Tecnología de Información y Comunicación en Educación, 7, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2015.27

[36]

Robert Branch. 2009. Instructional Design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer Science Business Media, LLC.

[37]

May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Mentoring in Online Entrepreneurship Course: Systematization Of An Experience In Higher Education. Formación Universitaria, 13(6), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062020000600267

[38]

Lewis, Aiken. 1985. Three Coeficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

[39]

Luis Miguel Escurra Escurra, M. L. (1988). Cuantificación de la Validez de Contenido por Criterio de Jueces. Revista De Psicología, 6(1-2), 103-111.

[40]

César Coll. 2004. Pedagogy and Curriculum. A Psychological Approach to The Development of The School Curriculum. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

[41]

Viviana Rodríguez Aranmendiz and Katherina Gallardo Córdova. 2019. Decisions In Evaluation: Postgraduate Virtual Environments, An Ex Post-Facto Study. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 19(59), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/59/06

[42]

Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Teri Reed Roads and Shiva Haghighi. 2011. Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, Attitudes and Outcomes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2011.6142996

[43]

Valeria Cantú González, Leonardo Glasserman Morales and María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Metric Behavior On Evaluation Of Entrepreneurship Education. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología E Información, 33 (79), 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2019.79.57902

[44]

May Portuguez Castro and Marcela Gómez Zermeño. 2020. Being an entrepreneur post-COVID-19- Resilience in times of crisis: a systematic literature review. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, vol. forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-07-2020-0246

Cited By

Portuguez-Castro M(2022)Mentoring in Educational Innovation: Systematization in the Experience of Teachers’ Educational Experimentation and ResearchProceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_87(838-849)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_87

Index Terms

Experts’ Judgment for Evaluation of an E-Learning Entrepreneurship Course in Higher Education
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Nurturing Social, Technological, and Scientific Entrepreneurship in Higher Education with Education 4.0 and Complex Thinking
Proceedings of TEEM 2023
Abstract
The strengthening of entrepreneurship in higher education has taken on great relevance in recent years since it constitutes a direct link between professional life and promotes competitiveness in the world of work, autonomy, creativity, and ...
Empowering the Development of Higher Education Counselors Teacher: Innovative Training Strategies to Strengthen Competency in Student Mentoring
Proceedings of TEEM 2023
Abstract
The training of counselor teachers requires a comprehensive approach and a collective commitment from the educational community that encompasses both the acquisition of pedagogical skills and the fostering of a supportive and guiding mindset for ...
The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education
Highlights
- The concept and vision of Education 4.0 in higher education are presented.
- Four ...
Abstract
Technological progress and its rapid evolution have positively affected the industrial sector and different productive/service sectors. One of the service-sectors that have benefited the most has been Education. In this sector, the ...
Graphical abstract

Display Omitted

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)

October 2021

823 pages

ISBN:9781450390668

DOI:10.1145/3486011

Editors:
Marc Alier
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTECH (UPC)
,
David Fonseca
La Salle, Ramon Llull University

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 December 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Novus

Conference

TEEM'21

TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 26 - 29, 2021

Barcelona, Spain

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
48
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Portuguez-Castro M(2022)Mentoring in Educational Innovation: Systematization in the Experience of Teachers’ Educational Experimentation and ResearchProceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_87(838-849)Online publication date: 19-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_87

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents