Cited By
View all- de La Hoz-Ruiz JKhalil MDomingo Segovia JLiu Q(2024)Learning analytics for enhanced professional capital development: a systematic reviewFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.130265815Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
Methods for the evaluation of social learning (2017-2021): systematic literature review
Authors: 
Ruth-Elizabeth Minga-Vallejo, María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, María-José Rodríguez-CondeAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 640 - 646
References
[1]
Damien Sanchez, Nick Flor, Charlotte N. Gunawardena. 2020. Employing Social Learning Analytic Methods (SLAMs) to Reimagine the Social Dynamic of Online Learning Collaborations. In M. Brown, M. Nic Giolla Mhichil, E. Beirne, & E. Costello (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Volume 1, Dublin City University, Dublin.
[2]
Mirna E. Sanabria Zotelo. 2020. Aprendizaje informal con las comunidades de práctica en la educación superior. Revista Argentina de Investigación en Negocios, 6(1), 141-148. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3qyFPuW
[3]
María S. Ibarra-Saiz, Gregorio Rodríguez-Gómez, D. Boud, T. Rotsaert, S. Brown, M. L. Salinas, and H. M. Rodríguez Gómez. 2020. The future of assessment in Higher Education.
[4]
Etienne Wenger, Beverly Trayner, and Maarten De Laat. 2011. Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3xArTmA
[5]
Oh Yunjin, and Min L. Soon. 2016. The effects of online interactions on the relationship between learning-related anxiety and intention to persist among e-learning students with visual impairment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 17(6), 89-107.
[6]
Sten Ludvigsen, Ulrike Cress, Nancy Law, Gerry Stahl, & Carolyn Rosé. 2017. Future direction for the CSCL field: Methodologies and eight controversies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 337-341.
[7]
Charlotte N. Gunawardena, Nick V. Flor, David Gomez, and Damien Sanchez. 2016. Analyzing social construction of knowledge online by employing interaction analysis, learning analytics, and social network analysis. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(3), 35. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3yx1DtV
[8]
Luis Radford. 2017. Aprendizaje desde la perspectiva de la teoría de la objetivación. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3ykjl3o
[9]
H. Z Schuttenberg, and Heidi K. Guth. 2015. Seeking our shared wisdom: A framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities. Ecology and Society, 20(1).
[10]
María S. Ibarra-Sáiz, and Gregorio Rodríguez-Gómez. 2015. Tecnologías para una evaluación participativa. La experiencia de uso de EvalCOMIX® en Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Investigar con y para la sociedad, 3, 1889-1895. Retrieved from http://aidipe2015.aidipe.org
[11]
Andrés Chiappe, Ricardo Pinto, and Vivian Arias. 2016. Open assessment of learning: A meta-Synthesis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 17(6), 44-61.
[12]
Aparecida M. Zem-Lopes, Laís Z. Pedro, Seiji Isotani, and I. I. Bittencourt. 2015. Quality evaluation of web-based educational software: A systematic mapping. 250-252.
[13]
José J. Díaz-Lázaro, Isabel M. Solano-Fernández, and María Sánchez-Vera. 2017. Social learning analytics in higher education. An experience at the primary education stage. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 6(2), 119-126.
[14]
Valerie Anderson, Jonny Gifford, & Janet Wildman. 2020. An evaluation of social learning and learner outcomes in a massive open online course (MOOC): a healthcare sector case study. Human Resource Development International, 23(3), 208-237.
[15]
E. Vrieling, A. Van den Beemt, and M. De Laat. 2016. What's in a name: Dimensions of social learning in teacher groups. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 273-292.
[16]
Simon Knight, and Karen Littleton. 2015. Dialogue as Data in Learning Analytics for Productive Educational Dialogue. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 111-143.
[17]
Carolyn P. Rosé. 2017. Discourse analytics. Handbook of learning analytics, 105-114.
[18]
Elaine Doyle, and Patrick Buckley. 2020. The impact of co-creation: An analysis of the effectiveness of student authored multiple choice questions on achievement of learning outcomes. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-10
[19]
Barbara Kitchenham, and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3dE6xgF
[20]
Barbara Kitchenham, Rialette Pretorius, David Budgen, O. P. Brereton, Mark Turner, Mahmood Niazi, and Stephen Linkman. 2010. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Information and software technology, 52(8), 792-805.
[21]
María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya. 2020. Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(17), 7053.
[22]
Francisco García-Peñalvo. 2017. Mapeos sistemáticos de literatura, revisiones sistemáticas de literatura y benchmarking de programas formativos. Retrieved from http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1056
[23]
Lluís Codina. 2015. No lo llame análisis bibliográfico, llámelo revisión sistematizada, Y cómo llevarla a cabo con garantías: Systematized reviews+ SALSA framwork. Lluís codina. Cultura académica, comunicación y documentación. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3jEll2o
[24]
María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, & Jairo Lugo-Ocando, 2020. Systematic review of mixed methods in the framework of educational innovation. Comunicar, 28(65), 9-20.
[25]
Laura-Icela González-Pérez, María-Soledad Ramírez-Montoya, & Francisco García-Peñalvo. 2019. Innovación educativa en estudios sobre el desarrollo y uso de la tecnología: Un mapeo sistemático. Retrieved from http://repositorio.grial.eu/handle/grial/1816
[26]
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas Altman, & Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Index Terms
- Methods for the evaluation of social learning (2017-2021): systematic literature review
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Social Construction of Learning: Analysis from the Participants of an Energy Sustainability xMOOC
Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityAbstractThe social construction of learning constitutes an important frame of reference in the understanding of social learning processes that take place in groups, communities, networks, through innovative training offers such as Massive Open Online ...
What leads to social learning? Students’ attitudes towards using social media applications in Omani higher education
AbstractSocial learning refers to the learning delivered through social media applications. The examination of students’ attitudes towards using social media applications for learning activities is still not fully understood. For this reason, this ...
Social Help-seeking Strategies in a Programming MOOC
SIGCSE '18: Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science EducationBeing able to seek help is a crucial part of any learning process. This includes both collaborative models such as asking for help from others as well as independent models such as using course materials and the vast resources provided by the Web. ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright © 2021 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 20 December 2021
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
TEEM'21
TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
October 26 - 29, 2021
Barcelona, Spain
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 74Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)14
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- de La Hoz-Ruiz JKhalil MDomingo Segovia JLiu Q(2024)Learning analytics for enhanced professional capital development: a systematic reviewFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2024.130265815Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format