[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/3208806.3208815acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesweb3dConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Efficient pose tracking from natural features in standard web browsers

Published: 20 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Computer Vision-based natural feature tracking is at the core of modern Augmented Reality applications. Still, Web-based Augmented Reality typically relies on location-based sensing (using GPS and orientation sensors) or marker-based approaches to solve the pose estimation problem.
We present an implementation and evaluation of an efficient natural feature tracking pipeline for standard Web browsers using HTML5 and WebAssembly. Our system can track image targets at real-time frame rates tablet PCs (up to 60 Hz) and smartphones (up to 25 Hz).

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (a17-gottl.mp4)

References

[1]
Sangchul Ahn, Heedong Ko, and Steven Feiner. 2013. Webizing mobile AR contents. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2013 IEEE. IEEE, 131--132.
[2]
Sangchul Ahn, Heedong Ko, and Byounghyun Yoo. 2014. Webizing mobile augmented reality content. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 20, 1 (2014), 79--100.
[3]
Awe.media. 2017. Bring your images to life. https://awe.media/blog/bring-your-images-to-life. (2017). Accessed: 2018-03-02.
[4]
Jerome Etienne. 2017. AR.js - Efficient Augmented Reality for the Web. https://github.com/jeromeetienne/AR.js. (2017). Accessed: 2018-03-02.
[5]
Google. 2017a. Quickstart for AR on the Web. https://developers.google.com/ar/develop/web/quickstart. (2017). Accessed: 2018-03-02.
[6]
Google. 2017b. WebARonARKit. https://github.com/google-ar/WebARonARKit. (2017). Accessed: 2018-04-22.
[7]
Immersive Web Community Group. 2018. WebXR Device API. https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/. (2018). Accessed: 2018-04-22.
[8]
Jens Grubert, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Matthias Kranz, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2016. Glasshands: Interaction around unmodified mobile devices using sunglasses. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces. ACM, 215--224.
[9]
Andreas Hartl, Jens Grubert, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Gerhard Reitmayr. 2013. Mobile interactive hologram verification. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2013 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 75--82.
[10]
Alex Hill, Blair MacIntyre, Maribeth Gandy, Brian Davidson, and Hafez Rouzati. 2010. Kharma: An open kml/html architecture for mobile augmented reality applications. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2010 9th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 233--234.
[11]
Rob Kooper and Blair MacIntyre. 2003. Browsing the real-world wide web: Maintaining awareness of virtual information in an AR information space. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16, 3 (2003), 425--446.
[12]
Tobias Langlotz, Jens Grubert, and Raphael Grasset. 2013. Augmented reality browsers: essential products or only gadgets? Commun. ACM 56, 11 (2013), 34--36.
[13]
Tobias Langlotz, Thanh Nguyen, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Raphael Grasset. 2014. Next-generation augmented reality browsers: rich, seamless, and adaptive. Proc. IEEE 102, 2 (2014), 155--169.
[14]
Martin Lechner. 2013. ARML 2.0 in the context of existing AR data formats. In Software Engineering and Architectures for Realtime Interactive Systems (SEARIS), 2013 6th Workshop on. IEEE, 41--47.
[15]
Martin Lechner and Markus Tripp. 2010. ARML - an augmented reality standard. coordinates 13, 47.797222 (2010), 432--440.
[16]
Teemu Leppänen, Arto Heikkinen, Antti Karhu, Erkki Harjula, Jukka Riekki, and Timo Koskela. 2014. Augmented reality web applications with mobile agents in the internet of things. In Next Generation Mobile Apps, Services and Technologies (NGMAST), 2014 Eighth International Conference on. IEEE, 54--59.
[17]
Blair MacIntyre, Alex Hill, Hafez Rouzati, Maribeth Gandy, and Brian Davidson. 2011. The Argon AR Web Browser and standards-based AR application environment. In Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 65--74.
[18]
Marius Muja and David G Lowe. 2009. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic algorithm configuration. VISAPP (1) 2, 331--340 (2009), 2.
[19]
Lyndon JB Nixon, Jens Grubert, Gerhard Reitmayr, and James Scicluna. 2012. SmartReality: Integrating the Web into Augmented Reality. In I-SEMANTICS (Posters & Demos). Citeseer, 48--54.
[20]
Christoph Oberhofer, Jens Grubert, and Gerhard Reitmayr. 2012. Natural feature tracking in javascript. In Virtual Reality Short Papers and Posters (VRW), 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 113--114.
[21]
Ethan Rublee, Vincent Rabaud, Kurt Konolige, and Gary Bradski. 2011. ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE international conference on. IEEE, 2564--2571.
[22]
Fernando Sambinelli and Cecilia Sosa Arias. 2015. Augmented Reality Browsers: A Proposal for Architectural Standardization. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications 6, 1 (2015), 1.
[23]
Gheric Speiginer, Blair MacIntyre, Jay Bolter, Hafez Rouzati, Amy Lambeth, Laura Levy, Laurie Baird, Maribeth Gandy, Matt Sanders, Brian Davidson, et al. 2015. The evolution of the argon web framework through its use creating cultural heritage and community-based augmented reality applications. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 112--124.
[24]
Bruce H Thomas. 2012. A survey of visual, mixed, and augmented reality gaming. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 10, 1 (2012), 3.
[25]
Daniel Wagner, Gerhard Reitmayr, Alessandro Mulloni, Tom Drummond, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2008. Pose tracking from natural features on mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE Computer Society, 125--134.
[26]
Daniel Wagner, Gerhard Reitmayr, Alessandro Mulloni, Tom Drummond, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2010. Real-time detection and tracking for augmented reality on mobile phones. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 16, 3 (2010), 355--368.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Demystifying Web-based Mobile Extended Reality Accelerated by WebAssemblyProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624833(145-153)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Efficient vision-based multi-target augmented reality in the browserMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12206-681:10(14303-14320)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2022
  • (2021)A study of Augmented Reality performance in web browsers (WebAR)2021 2nd International Conference on Computational Methods in Science & Technology (ICCMST)10.1109/ICCMST54943.2021.00065(281-286)Online publication date: Dec-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Efficient pose tracking from natural features in standard web browsers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    Web3D '18: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM Conference on 3D Web Technology
    June 2018
    199 pages
    ISBN:9781450358002
    DOI:10.1145/3208806
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. asm.js
    2. natural feature tracking
    3. web-based augmented reality
    4. webar
    5. webassembly
    6. webxr

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    Web3D '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 27 of 71 submissions, 38%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Demystifying Web-based Mobile Extended Reality Accelerated by WebAssemblyProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624833(145-153)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Efficient vision-based multi-target augmented reality in the browserMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-12206-681:10(14303-14320)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2022
    • (2021)A study of Augmented Reality performance in web browsers (WebAR)2021 2nd International Conference on Computational Methods in Science & Technology (ICCMST)10.1109/ICCMST54943.2021.00065(281-286)Online publication date: Dec-2021
    • (2019)WasabiProceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems10.1145/3297858.3304068(1045-1058)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2019

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media