Property talk:P3716
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Documentation
social classification
social class as recognized in traditional or state law
social class as recognized in traditional or state law
| Description | social class as recognized in traditional or state law | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Represents | social class (Q187588), personnal status in France (Q16677918), social status (Q189970) | |||||||||
| Data type | Item | |||||||||
| Domain | According to this template:
persons, fictional persons, mythical characters
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementshuman (Q5), family (Q8436), fictional character (Q95074), character that may or may not be fictional (Q21070598), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), lineage (Q1642895), hypothetical person (Q75855169) or stillborn child (Q2345820) | |||||||||
| Allowed values | culture-specific social class hierarchies (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | |||||||||
| Example | Sally Hemings (Q257464) → enslaved person (Q12773225) Thomas Wolsey (Q206512) → commoner (Q3443060) Domitilla the Elder (Q241102) → freedman (Q841571) | |||||||||
| Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P3716 (Q30283307) | |||||||||
| See also | noble title (P97) | |||||||||
| Lists |
| |||||||||
| Living people protection class | property likely to be challenged (Q44597997), property that may violate privacy (Q44601380) | |||||||||
| Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | |||||||||
| Current uses |
| |||||||||
| Search for values |
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Type “human (Q5), family (Q8436), fictional character (Q95074), character that may or may not be fictional (Q21070598), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), lineage (Q1642895), hypothetical person (Q75855169), stillborn child (Q2345820)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “human (Q5), family (Q8436), fictional character (Q95074), character that may or may not be fictional (Q21070598), legendary figure (Q13002315), mythical character (Q4271324), lineage (Q1642895), hypothetical person (Q75855169), stillborn child (Q2345820)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3716#Type Q5, Q8436, Q95074, Q21070598, Q13002315, Q4271324, Q1642895, Q75855169, Q2345820, SPARQL
Value type “social class (Q187588), legal status (Q2628882), social status (Q189970)”: This property should use items as value that contain property “instance of (P31)”. On these, the value for instance of (P31) should be an item that uses subclass of (P279) with value social class (Q187588), legal status (Q2628882), social status (Q189970) (or a subclass thereof). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P3716#Value type Q187588, Q2628882, Q189970, SPARQL
|
Value prisoner of war (Q179637) will be automatically replaced to value prisoner of war (Q179637) and moved to military casualty classification (P1347) property. Testing: TODO list |
|
This property is being used by: Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
Adding social status legal status as value type
[edit]I added social status (Q189970) legal status (Q2628882) as a possible value type so that it can be used with a status like outlaw (Q254508) (e.g. Robin Hood (Q122634)). The German and English label seem to allow this, but the descriptions not really, as I noticed after the change. On the other hand the initial label during the proposal and Wikidata item of this property (P1629) social status (Q189970) suggest this kind of value. Does anybody object to the change? Should the descriptions be altered then, too? - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)