[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (61)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = soil moisture storage capacity

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 3463 KiB  
Article
The Distributed Xin’anjiang Model Incorporating the Analytic Solution of the Storage Capacity Under Unsteady-State Conditions
by Qifeng Song, Xi Chen and Zhicai Zhang
Water 2024, 16(22), 3252; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223252 - 12 Nov 2024
Viewed by 566
Abstract
Developing a functional linkage between hydrological variables and easily accessible terrain and soil information is a novel concept for distributed hydrological models. This approach aims to address limitations imposed by data scarcity and high computational demands. The model hypothesizes that the relationship between [...] Read more.
Developing a functional linkage between hydrological variables and easily accessible terrain and soil information is a novel concept for distributed hydrological models. This approach aims to address limitations imposed by data scarcity and high computational demands. The model hypothesizes that the relationship between the evaporation flux and the absolute value of the matric potential follows a power exponential pattern. Analytic solutions for the groundwater depth, the evaporation capacity, and the storage capacity are derived with respect to the topographic index, considering the relationship between the groundwater depth and the topographic index and the influence of setting off. Subsequently, a distributed Xin’anjiang Model using the analytic solution of the storage capacity under unsteady-state conditions is constructed. This new model is employed to simulate soil moisture and discharge in the Tarrawarra Watershed. The simulation results for soil moisture and discharge are compared with those from the Storage Capacity Model and the DHSVM. Additionally, the computational speeds of all three models are compared. The findings indicate that the simulation accuracy of the new model for soil moisture and discharge surpasses that of the Storage Capacity Model and the DHSVM. Meanwhile, the computational speed of the new model is significantly faster than the DHSVM and slightly slower than the Storage Capacity Model. It offers a balance between computational efficiency, predictive accuracy, and physical mechanism representation. The data requirements of the new model are minimal and easy to procure, and it requires less computational effort. Moreover, it accurately captures the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil moisture and the discharge process of the watershed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The distribution of terrain, soil moisture observation points, and groundwater observation points in the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The distribution of topographic indices.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The vertical distributions of soil moisture when the depth is set at 0.8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The vertical distributions of soil moisture when the depth is set at 1.3 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The vertical distributions of soil moisture when the depth is set at 1.8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The relationship between the evaporative flux and the matric potential when the depth is set at 0.8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The relationship between the evaporative flux and the matric potential when the depth is set at 1.3 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The relationship between the evaporative flux and the matric potential when the depth is set at 1.8 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The simulated and observed discharge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The changing process of simulated and observed soil moisture.deficit within 0–60 cm below the ground surface at point S2.</p>
Full article ">
32 pages, 28061 KiB  
Article
Linking Vegetation Phenology to Net Ecosystem Productivity: Climate Change Impacts in the Northern Hemisphere Using Satellite Data
by Hanmin Yin, Xiaofei Ma, Xiaohan Liao, Huping Ye, Wentao Yu, Yue Li, Junbo Wei, Jincheng Yuan and Qiang Liu
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(21), 4101; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16214101 - 2 Nov 2024
Viewed by 1171
Abstract
With global climate change, linking vegetation phenology with net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is crucial for assessing vegetation carbon storage capacity and predicting terrestrial ecosystem changes. However, there have been few studies investigating the relationship between vegetation phenology and NEP in the middle and [...] Read more.
With global climate change, linking vegetation phenology with net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is crucial for assessing vegetation carbon storage capacity and predicting terrestrial ecosystem changes. However, there have been few studies investigating the relationship between vegetation phenology and NEP in the middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. This study comprehensively analyzed vegetation phenological changes and their climate drivers using satellite data. It also investigated the spatial distribution and climate drivers of NEP and further analyzed the sensitivity of NEP to vegetation phenology. The results indicated that the average land surface phenology (LSP) was dominated by a monotonic trend in the study area. LSP derived from different satellite products and retrieval methods exhibited relatively consistent responses to climate. The average SOS and POS for different retrieval methods showed a higher negative correlation with nighttime temperatures compared to daytime temperatures. The average EOS exhibited a higher negative correlation with daytime temperatures than a positive correlation. The correlations between VPD and the average SOS, POS, and EOS showed that the proportion of negative correlations was higher than that of positive correlations. The average annual NEP ranged from 0 to 1000 gC·m−2. The cumulative trends of NEP were mainly monotonically increasing, accounting for 61.04%, followed by monotonically decreasing trends, which accounted for 17.95%. In high-latitude regions, the proportion of positive correlation between VPD and NEP was predominant, while the proportion of negative correlation was predominant in middle-latitude regions. The positive and negative correlations between soil moisture and NEP (48.08% vs. 51.92%) were basically consistent in the study area. The correlation between SOS and POS with NEP was predominantly negative. The correlation between EOS and NEP was overall characterized by a greater proportion of negative correlations than positive correlations. The correlation between LOS and NEP exhibited a positive relationship in most areas. The sensitivity of NEP to vegetation phenological parameters (SOS, POS, and EOS) was negative, while the sensitivity of NEP to LOS was positive (0.75 gC·m−2/d for EVI vs. 0.63 gC·m−2/d for LAI vs. 0.30 gC·m−2/d for SIF). This study provides new insights and a theoretical basis for exploring the relationship between vegetation phenology and NEP under global climate change. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Land Surface Phenology II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spatial distribution of vegetation types (<b>a</b>) and elevation (<b>b</b>) in the middle and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere. The left histogram (<b>a</b>) represents the proportion of the corresponding land cover type, and the right histogram (<b>b</b>) represents the proportion of the corresponding elevation. ENF: Evergreen Needleleaf Forests; EBF: Evergreen Broadleaf Forests; DNF: Deciduous Needleleaf Forests; DBF: Deciduous Broadleaf Forests; MF: Mixed Forests; CS: Closed Shrublands; OS: Open Shrublands; WS: Woody Savannas; SA: Savannas; GRA: Grasslands.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The spatial distribution of multi-year average LSP retrieved by three different methods and different satellite products over the period of 2001–2021. Each histogram in the bottom left corner represents the frequency distribution of the corresponding phenological date.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The spatial distribution of the cumulative trend of average LSP using the EEMD method based on different satellite products and retrieval methods from 2001 to 2021. The histogram inserted in the bottom left corner of each panel describes the frequency distribution of the corresponding cumulative trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Interannual variations of average LSP from 2001 to 2021. Panels (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) represent the interannual variations of average SOS, POS, EOS, and LOS based on different remote sensing satellite datasets and retrieval methods. The “linear trend” refers to the trend of phenological parameters using a linear regression model. The “EEMD trend” signifies the average rate of instantaneous trend change, representing the average EEMD trend.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation coefficients between average phenological parameters (SOS and EOS) and climate factors. The histograms represent the frequency distribution of the corresponding partial correlation coefficients. The abbreviations SM, DT, NT, and VPD represent soil moisture, daytime temperature, nighttime temperature, and vapor pressure deficit, respectively. The black dots represent pixels that have passed the significance test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The spatial distribution of the partial correlation coefficients between average POS and climatic factors can be found in <a href="#app1-remotesensing-16-04101" class="html-app">Figure S12</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial distribution of multi-year average NEP (<b>a</b>) and cumulative trend changes (<b>b</b>) based on the NEP estimation model in regional scales from 2001 to 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Spatial distribution of partial correlation coefficients between NEP and annual average climate factors. The histograms represent the frequency distribution of the corresponding partial correlation coefficients. The abbreviations SM, TEM<sub>MAX</sub>, TEM<sub>MIN</sub>, and VPD represent soil moisture, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, and vapor pressure deficit, respectively. The black dots represent pixels that have passed the significance test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Frequency of partial correlation between NEP estimated at the regional scale and climate driving factors for different vegetation functional types. The upward and downward bars represent the percentages of positive and negative correlations, respectively. The white bar indicates the proportion of significant correlation (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05). The definitions of the abbreviations on the x-axis are the same as in <a href="#remotesensing-16-04101-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Frequency of partial correlation between NEP sites and climate driving factors for different vegetation functional types. The upward and downward bars represent the percentages of positive and negative correlations, respectively. The white bar indicates the proportion of significant correlation (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The spatial distribution of the correlation between LSP and NEP based on different satellite products. The black dots represent pixels that have passed the significance test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The spatial distribution of the sensitivity of NEP to LSP based on different satellite products. The black dots represent pixels that have passed the significance test (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The spatial distribution of the cumulative trend changes in preseason climate factors based on EVI data sources.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The spatial distribution of multi-year average NEP (<b>a</b>) and its three-dimensional variations (<b>b</b>–<b>d</b>), along with their average latitudinal distribution (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The spatial distribution (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and latitude distribution (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) of the cumulative trends of climate variables from 2001 to 2021.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>The spatial distribution (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) and latitude distribution (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) of the climate sensitivity of NEP.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 27309 KiB  
Article
Impact of Natural and Human Factors on Dryland Vegetation in Eurasia from 2003 to 2022
by Jinyue Liu, Jie Zhao, Junhao He, Pengyi Zhang, Fan Yi, Chao Yue, Liang Wang, Dawei Mei, Si Teng, Luyao Duan, Nuoxi Sun and Zhenhong Hu
Plants 2024, 13(21), 2985; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13212985 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 638
Abstract
Eurasian dryland ecosystems consist mainly of cropland and grassland, and their changes are driven by both natural factors and human activities. This study utilized the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), gross primary productivity (GPP) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to analyze the changing [...] Read more.
Eurasian dryland ecosystems consist mainly of cropland and grassland, and their changes are driven by both natural factors and human activities. This study utilized the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), gross primary productivity (GPP) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to analyze the changing characteristics of vegetation activity in Eurasia over the past two decades. Additionally, we integrated the mean annual temperature (MAT), the mean annual precipitation (MAP), the soil moisture (SM), the vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and the terrestrial water storage (TWS) to analyze natural factors’ influence on the vegetation activity from 2003 to 2022. Through partial correlation and residual analysis, we quantitatively described the contributions of both natural and human factors to changes in vegetation activity. The results indicated an overall increasing trend in vegetation activity in Eurasia; the growth rates of vegetation greenness, productivity and photosynthetic capacity were 1.00 × 10−3 yr−1 (p < 0.01), 1.30 g C m−2 yr−2 (p < 0.01) and 1.00 × 10−3 Wm−2μm−1sr−1yr−1 (p < 0.01), respectively. Furthermore, we found that soil moisture was the most important natural factor influencing vegetation activity. Human activities were identified as the main driving factors of vegetation activity in the Eurasian drylands. The relative contributions of human-induced changes to NDVI, GPP and SIF were 52.45%, 55.81% and 74.18%, respectively. These findings can deepen our understanding of the impacts of current natural change and intensified human activities on dryland vegetation coverage change in Eurasia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forest Disturbance and Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The spatial distribution map of aridity levels (<b>a</b>) and vegetation types (<b>b</b>) in the Eurasian drylands. WCE, EEU, the MED, WSB, ESB, WCA, ECA, TIB, EAS, ARP and SAS represent West and Central Europe, E. Europe, Mediterranean, W. Siberia, E. Siberia, W. C. Asia, E. C. Asia, Tibet Plateau, E. Asia, Arabian Peninsula and S. Asia, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Interannual variation of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, (<b>a</b>)), gross primary productivity (GPP, (<b>b</b>)) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF, (<b>c</b>)) in Eurasian drylands during 2003–2022. Shading denotes 95% prediction intervals. All regressions were significant (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, the Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Spatial distribution of the temporal trends in normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, (<b>a</b>)), gross primary productivity (GPP, (<b>b</b>)) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF, (<b>c</b>)) during 2003–2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Temporal trends in the mean annual temperature (MAT, (<b>a</b>)), mean annual precipitation (MAP, (<b>b</b>)), soil moisture (SM, (<b>c</b>)), vapor pressure deficit (VPD, (<b>d</b>)) and terrestrial water storage (TWS, (<b>e</b>)) in Eurasian drylands during 2003–2022, respectively. Solid (dashed) lines indicate significant (insignificant) regressions (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05, the Student’s <span class="html-italic">t</span>-test).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution of the linear trends in mean annual temperature (MAT, (<b>a</b>)), mean annual precipitation (MAP, (<b>b</b>)), soil moisture (SM, (<b>c</b>)), vapor pressure deficit (VPD, (<b>d</b>)) and terrestrial water storage (TWS, (<b>e</b>)) from 2003 to 2022.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Spatial patterns of partial correlation coefficient between NDVI, GPP, SIF and natural factors. (<b>a</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>g</b>,<b>j</b>,<b>m</b>) show the partial correlation coefficient between normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), soil moisture (SM), vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and terrestrial water storage (TWS), respectively. (<b>b</b>,<b>e</b>,<b>h</b>,<b>k</b>,<b>n</b>) show the partial correlation coefficient between gross primary productivity (GPP) and MAT, MAP, SM, VPD and TWS, respectively. (<b>c</b>,<b>f</b>,<b>i</b>,<b>l</b>,<b>o</b>) show the partial correlation coefficient between solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and MAT, MAP, SM, VPD and TWS, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Partial correlation coefficient between NDVI, GPP, SIF and natural factors. Red, blue and green bars represent the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the gross primary productivity (GPP) and the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), respectively. MAT (<b>a</b>), MAP (<b>b</b>), SM (<b>c</b>), VPD (<b>d</b>) and TWS (<b>e</b>) represent the mean annual temperature, the mean annual precipitation, the soil moisture, the vapor pressure deficit and the terrestrial water storage, respectively. WCE, EEU, the MED, WSB, ESB, WCA, ECA, TIB, EAS, ARP and SAS represent West and Central Europe, E. Europe, Mediterranean, W. Siberia, E. Siberia, W. C. Asia, E. C. Asia, Tibet Plateau, E. Asia, Arabian Peninsula and S. Asia, respectively. The symbol “*” indicates that the partial correlation coefficient has passed the significance test with <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Spatial distributions of the relative contributions of natural and human factors to the changes in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>)), gross primary productivity (GPP, (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>)) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF, (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>)). Left and right columns represent natural and human factors, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Relative contributions of natural and human factors to the changes in the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), gross primary productivity (GPP) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) in WCE (West and Central Europe), EEU (E. Europe), the MED (Mediterranean), WSB (W. Siberia), ESB (E. Siberia), WCA (W. C. Asia), ECA (E. C. Asia), TIB (Tibet Plateau), EAS (E. Asia), ARP (Arabian Peninsula) and SAS (S. Asia). Red, blue and green bars represent NDVI, GPP and SIF, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Spatial distribution of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, (<b>a</b>)), gross primary productivity (GPP, (<b>b</b>)) and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF, (<b>c</b>)) change drivers. “Improvement” represents an increasing trend in vegetation index over the past 20 years, while “degradation” indicates a declining trend in vegetation index over the same period.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 23991 KiB  
Article
Conceptual and Applied Aspects of Water Retention Tests on Tailings Using Columns
by Fernando A. M. Marinho, Yuri Corrêa, Rosiane Soares, Inácio Diniz Carvalho and João Paulo de Sousa Silva
Geosciences 2024, 14(10), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14100273 - 16 Oct 2024
Viewed by 751
Abstract
The water retention capacity of porous materials is crucial in various geotechnical and environmental engineering applications such as slope stability analysis, landfill management, and mining operations. Filtered tailings stacks are considered an alternative to traditional tailings dams. Nevertheless, the mechanical behaviour and stability [...] Read more.
The water retention capacity of porous materials is crucial in various geotechnical and environmental engineering applications such as slope stability analysis, landfill management, and mining operations. Filtered tailings stacks are considered an alternative to traditional tailings dams. Nevertheless, the mechanical behaviour and stability of the material under different water content conditions are of concern because these stacks can reach considerable heights. The water behaviour in these structures is poorly understood, particularly the effects of the water content on the stability and potential for liquefaction of the stacks. This study aims to investigate the water retention and flow characteristics of compacted iron ore tailings in high columns to better understand their hydromechanical behaviour. The research used 5 m high columns filled with iron ore tailings from the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The columns were prepared in layers, compacted, and instrumented with moisture content sensors and suction sensors to monitor the water movement during various stages of saturation, drainage, infiltration, and evaporation. The sensors provided consistent data and revealed that the tailings exhibited high drainage capacity. The moisture content and suction profiles were effectively established over time and revealed the dynamic water retention behaviour. The comparison of the data with the theoretical soil water retention curve (SWRC) demonstrated a good correlation which indicates that there was no hysteresis in the material response. The study concludes that the column setup effectively captures the water retention and flow characteristics of compacted tailings and provides valuable insights for the hydromechanical analysis of filtered tailings stacks. These findings can significantly help improve numerical models, calibrate material parameters, and contribute to the safer and more efficient management of tailings storage facilities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Ore-pile draining and (<b>b</b>) water content variation along the pile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relationship between the water content and the amount of fines.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Physical model of a soil column with a water table (<b>b</b>) Relationships between free energy and water content in a soil column with a fixed water table (<b>c</b>) Variation of water content with the height of the column (modified from Edlefesen and Anderson [<a href="#B7-geosciences-14-00273" class="html-bibr">7</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Suction (<b>a</b>) and water content (<b>b</b>) profile in the field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) PVC column; (<b>b</b>) schematic drawing of the column; (<b>c</b>) suction equilibrium profile, and (<b>d</b>) water content profiles for three hypothetical materials [<a href="#B15-geosciences-14-00273" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Soil water retention curve of the material (data from Jesus et al. [<a href="#B22-geosciences-14-00273" class="html-bibr">22</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Segments for the column assembly.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Drainage segment. Placement of (<b>a</b>) gravel and (<b>b</b>) medium sand.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Column compaction process: (<b>a</b>) Details of the compaction; (<b>b</b>) column at its 6th segment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>First completed column: (<b>a</b>) Image of the completed column; (<b>b</b>) sensor positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Time lag graphical analysis between sensors WC6 and TE6 during (<b>a</b>) saturation, (<b>b</b>) drainage, (<b>c</b>) infiltration, and (<b>d</b>) evaporation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Stages imposed in the columns.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Profiles at the end of construction and before saturation: (<b>a</b>) Volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Profiles during saturation: (<b>a</b>) Volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Profiles during drainage: (<b>a</b>) Volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Responses of the TE6 (<b>a</b>) and WC6 (<b>b</b>) sensors to the first infiltration and evaporation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Responses of the TE6 (<b>a</b>) and WC6 (<b>b</b>) sensors to the second infiltration and evaporation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Profiles during the first infiltration: (<b>a</b>) volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Profiles during the first evaporation: (<b>a</b>) volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Profiles during the second infiltration: (<b>a</b>) volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Profiles during the second evaporation: (<b>a</b>) Volumetric water content and (<b>b</b>) suction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Measured water flux at the base of the column.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>A closer look at the sensor readings plotted with the retention curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 24
<p>Water retention curve with the sensor readings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 25
<p>SWRC versus infiltration and evaporation data.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4494 KiB  
Article
Magnetized Saline Water Drip Irrigation Alters Soil Water-Salt Infiltration and Redistribution Characteristics
by Mingliang Xin, Qiao Zhao, Ying Qiao and Yingjie Ma
Water 2024, 16(18), 2693; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182693 - 22 Sep 2024
Viewed by 947
Abstract
Magnetization constitutes an efficacious physical treatment technique applicable to saline water. The new spiral flow magnetizer, in conjunction with the cyclic magnetization process, has the effect of maximizing effective magnetization time and thereby achieving the optimal magnetization results. Based on this, saline water [...] Read more.
Magnetization constitutes an efficacious physical treatment technique applicable to saline water. The new spiral flow magnetizer, in conjunction with the cyclic magnetization process, has the effect of maximizing effective magnetization time and thereby achieving the optimal magnetization results. Based on this, saline water (0.27, 3, 6, and 10 g L−1) was treated with different levels of magnetization (0, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 T), and the effects of magnetized saline water (MSW) drip irrigation on loamy-sand soil moisture, soluble salt infiltration, and redistribution characteristics were studied through a vertical soil column simulation experiment. The results showed that the wetting front migration in MSW drip irrigation experiments exhibited minimal variation during soil water infiltration, and a notable change during redistribution with the experimental duration of 0.27 and 3g L−1 saline water treatments being significantly different (p < 0.05). Treating saline water with different mineralization levels with magnetization demonstrated water retention (0.27 g L−1 excluded) and salt drainage characteristics; calculated soil water storage increased by 1.58–14.19% and salt storage decreased by 0.22–7.66%. The optimal magnetization intensity for low-mineralization (0.27 and 3 g L−1) saline water was 0.2 T and for high-mineralization (6 and 10 g L−1) it was 0.6 T. The adsorption and exchange of cations (19.58–32.12%) by the optimum MSW treatments was greater than that of anions (9.46–14.15%); specifically, the relative exchange capacity of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in cations was more than K+ and Na+, while HCO3 and SO42− in anions was more than Cl. This study provides theoretical and technical support for the irrigation of farmland with poor-quality water, as well as for the development of magnetized water irrigation technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Water)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Spiral flow magnetizing device schematic diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Experimental system of soil water-salt transport.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Characteristics of wetting front movement in magnetized saline water drip irrigation. (<b>A</b>) Treatments of 0.27 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>B</b>) Treatments of 3 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>C</b>) Treatments of 6 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>D</b>) Treatments of 10 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>E</b>) ANOVA of experimental duration, different lower case letters indicate significant differences in data across treatments for the same mineralization (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution characteristics of soil moisture content in magnetized saline water drip irrigation. (<b>A</b>) Treatments of 0.27 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>B</b>) Treatments of 3 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>C</b>) Treatments of 6 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>D</b>) Treatments of 10 g L<sup>−1</sup> saline water, (<b>E</b>) Water balance calculation, different lower case letters indicate significant differences in data across treatments for the same mineralization (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Salt balance calculation, different lower case letters indicate significant differences in data across treatments for the same mineralization (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Distribution characteristics of soil salinity in magnetized saline water drip irrigation.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 7690 KiB  
Article
Interpretation of Soil Characteristics and Preferential Water Flow in Different Forest Covers of Karst Areas of China
by Xiaoqing Kan, Jinhua Cheng, Wengang Zheng, Lili Zhangzhong, Jing Li, Changbin Liu and Xin Zhang
Water 2024, 16(16), 2319; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162319 - 18 Aug 2024
Viewed by 828
Abstract
Soil hydrology seriously affects the prevention of desertification in karst areas. However, water infiltration in the different soil layers of secondary forests and artificial forests in karst areas remains uncertain. This lack of clarity is also the factor that constrains local vegetation restoration. [...] Read more.
Soil hydrology seriously affects the prevention of desertification in karst areas. However, water infiltration in the different soil layers of secondary forests and artificial forests in karst areas remains uncertain. This lack of clarity is also the factor that constrains local vegetation restoration. Therefore, monitoring and simulating the priority transport of soil moisture will help us understand the shallow soil moisture transport patterns after artificial vegetation restoration in the local area, providing a reference for more scientific restoration of the ecological environment and enhancement of carbon storage in karst areas. The integration of soil physical property assessments, computed tomography (CT) scanning, dye tracing studies, and HYDRUS-2D modeling was utilized to evaluate and contrast the attributes of soil macropores and the phenomenon of preferential flow across various forestland categories. This approach allowed for a comprehensive analysis of how the soil structure and water movement are influenced by different forest ecosystems and infiltration head simulations (5 mm, 15 mm, 35 mm, and 55 mm) to elucidate the dynamics of water movement across diverse soil types within karst regions, to identify the causes of water leakage due to preferential flow in secondary forests, and to understand the mechanisms of water conservation and reduction in artificial forests adopting a multifaceted approach. This study demonstrated that (1) the soil hydrological capacity of a plantation forest was 20% higher than a natural forest, which may be promoted by the clay content and distribution. (2) Afforestation-enhanced soils in karst regions demonstrate a significant capacity to mitigate the loss of clay particles during episodes of preferential flow and then improve the soil erosion resistance by about 5 times, which can effectively control desertification in karst area. (3) The uniform distribution of macropores in plantation forest soil was conducive to prevent water leakage more effectively than the secondary forest but was incapable of hindering the occurrence of preferential flow. The secondary forest had a very developed preferential flow phenomenon, and soil clay deposition occurred with an increase in depth. (4) Moreover, the results for preferential flow showed that the matrix flow depth did not increase with the increase in water quantity. Short-term and high-intensity heavy rainfall events facilitated the occurrence of preferential flow. Infiltration along the horizontal and vertical directions occurred simultaneously. These results could facilitate a further understanding of the contribution of the plantation to soil amelioration and the prevention of desertification in karst areas, and provide some suggestions for the sustainable development of forestry in karst areas where plantation restoration is an important ingredient. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>In situ sample collection area map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>HYDRUS-2D modelling. The observation points are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, from left to right and from top to bottom. The atmospheric bound and constant head, respectively, represent the soil surface without and with water infiltration, and are used to more vividly describe the changes in the soil moisture front.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Example dye images for horizontal soil sections in the three types of sites with different precipitation amounts. G5, G15, G35, and G55 correspond to 5, 15, 35, and 55 mm ponded water infiltration simulation and simulate the changes in ponded water under light rain, medium rain, heavy rain, and stormy conditions, respectively. The bottom column shows the average dye coverage (DC) (yellow curve) and standard deviation (black part) of the three sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Example dye images for horizontal soil sections in the three types of sites with different precipitation amounts. G5, G15, G35, and G55 correspond to 5, 15, 35, and 55 mm ponded water infiltration simulation and simulate the changes in ponded water under light rain, medium rain, heavy rain, and stormy conditions, respectively. The bottom column shows the average dye coverage (DC) (yellow curve) and standard deviation (black part) of the three sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3 Cont.
<p>Example dye images for horizontal soil sections in the three types of sites with different precipitation amounts. G5, G15, G35, and G55 correspond to 5, 15, 35, and 55 mm ponded water infiltration simulation and simulate the changes in ponded water under light rain, medium rain, heavy rain, and stormy conditions, respectively. The bottom column shows the average dye coverage (DC) (yellow curve) and standard deviation (black part) of the three sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Results of industrial CT scanning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Results of water migration during the initial 24 h of the experiment under G55 as simulated by HYDRUS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Soil water retention curves computed by HYDRUS-2D; 1 is 0–15 cm, 2 is 15–30 cm, and 3 is 30–50 cm.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 3662 KiB  
Article
Basalt Fibers versus Plant Fibers: The Effect of Fiber-Reinforced Red Clay on Shear Strength and Thermophysical Properties under Freeze–Thaw Conditions
by Tunasheng Wu, Junhong Yuan, Feng Wang, Qiansheng He, Baoyu Huang, Linghong Kong and Zhan Huang
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6440; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156440 - 27 Jul 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1262
Abstract
Freeze–thaw cycling has a significant impact on the energy utilization and stability of roadbed fill. Given the good performance of basalt fiber (BF) and plant fiber (PF), a series of indoor tests are conducted on fiber-reinforced red clay (RC) specimens to analyze the [...] Read more.
Freeze–thaw cycling has a significant impact on the energy utilization and stability of roadbed fill. Given the good performance of basalt fiber (BF) and plant fiber (PF), a series of indoor tests are conducted on fiber-reinforced red clay (RC) specimens to analyze the shear strength, thermophysical, and microstructural changes and damage mechanisms of the RC under the freeze–thaw cycle–BF coupling, meanwhile, comparing the improvement effect of PF. The results indicate that the RC cohesion (c) first increases and then decreases with the increasing fiber content under BF improvement, reaching the maximum value at the content of 2%, and the change in the internal friction angle (φ) is relatively small. As the number of freeze–thaw cycles increases, cohesion (c) first decreases and then gradually stabilizes. The thermal conductivity increases with increasing moisture content, and the thermal effusivity increases and then decreases with increasing moisture content and fiber content. The heat storage capacity reaches the optimum level at a moisture content of 22.5% and a fiber content of 1%. Microanalysis reveals that at 2% fiber content, a fiber network structure is initially formed, and the gripping effect is optimal. The shear strength of PF-improved soil is higher than that of BF at a fiber content of 4–6%, and the thermal conductivity is better than that of BF. At the same fiber content, the heat storage and insulation capacity of BF-improved soil is significantly higher than that of PF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Field soil sample of RC in Hohhot. (<b>b</b>) PF sample (<b>c</b>) BF sample. (<b>d</b>) Straight shear specimen of unfrozen and thawed portion. (<b>e</b>) RC specimen after freezing (<b>f</b>,<b>g</b>) Thermal conductivity tester main body and probe (<b>h</b>) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) test apparatus model S-3400N.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Variation of shear strength index with BF contents (<b>b</b>) Variation of internal friction angle (φ) with BF contents and number of freeze–thaw cycles (<b>c</b>) Cohesion (<b>c</b>) with BF contents (<b>d</b>) Cohesion (<b>c</b>) with number of freeze–thaw cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Crushed specimen after a freeze–thaw cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Thermal conductivity versus moisture content (<b>b</b>) Thermal effusivity versus moisture content (<b>c</b>) Thermal diffusivity versus moisture content (<b>d</b>) XRD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) BF contents versus thermal conductivity (<b>b</b>) BF contents versus thermal effusivity (<b>c</b>) BF contents versus thermal diffusivity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Vegetative RC; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) Content of 1%; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Content of 2%; (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) Content of 3%; (<b>i</b>) Content of 0% after 4 freeze–thaw cycles; (<b>j</b>) Content of 2% after 4 freeze–thaw cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Mechanism of action of BF-improved RC under freeze–thaw cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) LF contents versus cohesive forces (<b>b</b>) LF contents versus thermal conductivity (<b>c</b>) LF contents versus thermal effusivity (<b>d</b>) LF contents versus thermal diffusivity.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3766 KiB  
Article
Status of Soil Health Indicators after 18 Years of Systematic Tillage in a Long-Term Experiment
by Hanaa Tharwat Mohamed Ibrahim, Maxwell Maimela Modiba, Igor Dekemati, Györgyi Gelybó, Márta Birkás and Barbara Simon
Agronomy 2024, 14(2), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14020278 - 26 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1291
Abstract
Long-term cultivation experiments are gaining more attention due to the possibility of following the changes in soil parameters (e.g., soil organic carbon (SOC), stock and soil health indicators, etc.). Our objective was to assess the status of soil in an 18-year-old tillage experiment [...] Read more.
Long-term cultivation experiments are gaining more attention due to the possibility of following the changes in soil parameters (e.g., soil organic carbon (SOC), stock and soil health indicators, etc.). Our objective was to assess the status of soil in an 18-year-old tillage experiment after almost two decades of systematic tillage. In this research, soil physical (bulk density, moisture content), chemical (pH, SOC), and biological properties (soil microbial respiration, abundance, biomass, species composition of earthworms, yield) were used as indicators in three soil cultivation methods representing different degrees of disturbance (no-till—NT; shallow cultivation—SC; and ploughing—P). Based on our results, there were significant differences in bulk density (NT > SC, P) in 0–10 cm, and NT > P in deeper layers (10–20, 20–30, 30–40 cm), while the SOC content in 0–10 cm was the highest in NT (2.5%), followed by SC (2.4%) and P (2.0%). Soil microbial respiration was significantly greater in NT than in SC and P. The abundance and biomass of earthworms was the highest in NT (189 ind m−2, 41.26 g m−2), followed by SC (125 ind m−2, 36.9 g m−2) and P (48 ind m−2, 7.4 g m−2). We concluded that NT offered a beneficial habitat for earthworms and microorganisms and a high SOC storage capacity; however, bulk density was less convenient due to soil compaction in our experiment. Therefore, SC can be used as an alternative approach for sustainable soil tillage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Location of the long-term experimental farm (Józsefmajor-Hatvan, Central Hungary). (Source: [<a href="#B33-agronomy-14-00278" class="html-bibr">33</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil bulk density values (Autumn, 2020) (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters beside the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The soil pH(KCl) values (Autumn, 2020). (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters beside the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The soil organic carbon values (Autumn, 2020). (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters beside the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The soil organic carbon stock values (Autumn, 2020). (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters beside the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The soil microbial respiration values (Autumn, 2020). (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters above the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>A</b>) The earthworm abundance values (Autumn, 2020). (<b>B</b>) The earthworm biomass values (Autumn, 2020). (P—ploughing, SC—shallow cultivation, NT—no-till). The same letters above the bars designate no statistical difference.</p>
Full article ">
9 pages, 1049 KiB  
Communication
Field to Greenhouse: How Stable Is the Soil Microbiome after Removal from the Field?
by Priyanka Kushwaha, Ana L. Soto Velázquez, Colleen McMahan and Julia W. Neilson
Microorganisms 2024, 12(1), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010110 - 5 Jan 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1719
Abstract
Plant-soil feedback (PSF) processes impact plant productivity and ecosystem function, but they are poorly understood because PSFs vary significantly with plant and soil type, plant growth stage, and environmental conditions. Controlled greenhouse studies are essential to unravel the mechanisms associating PSFs with plant [...] Read more.
Plant-soil feedback (PSF) processes impact plant productivity and ecosystem function, but they are poorly understood because PSFs vary significantly with plant and soil type, plant growth stage, and environmental conditions. Controlled greenhouse studies are essential to unravel the mechanisms associating PSFs with plant productivity; however, successful implementation of these controlled experiments is constrained by our understanding of the persistence of the soil microbiome during the transition from field to greenhouse. This study evaluates the preservation potential of a field soil microbiome when stored in the laboratory under field temperature and moisture levels. Soil microbial diversity, taxonomic composition, and functional potential were evaluated via amplicon sequencing at the start of storage (W0), week 3 (W3), week 6 (W6), and week 9 (W9) to determine the effect of storage time on soil microbiome integrity. Though microbial richness remained stable, Shannon diversity indices decreased significantly at W6 for bacteria/archaea and W3 for fungi. Bacterial/archaeal community composition also remained stable, whereas the fungal community changed significantly during the first 3 weeks. Functional predictions revealed increased capacity for chemoheterotrophy for bacteria/archaea and decreased relative proportions of arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal fungi. We show that preservation of the field soil microbiome must be a fundamental component of experimental design. Either greenhouse experiments should be initiated within 3 weeks of field soil collection, or a preliminary incubation study should be conducted to determine the time and storage conditions required to sustain the integrity of the specific field soil microbiome being studied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effect of Soil Microbes on Plant Growth and Crop Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Soil bacterial/archaeal and fungal diversity during the 9 weeks of soil storage duration. Alpha diversity is depicted as richness (number of observed amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)) and Shannon index across the four time points for (<b>A</b>) bacteria and archaea, and (<b>B</b>) fungi. Boxes represent the inter-quartile range of the data, and the median is indicated by a horizontal line. Statistically significant differences across the four time points are represented by the different letters (Kruskal–Wallis test; <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05). Bacterial/archaeal (<b>C</b>) and fungal (<b>D</b>) community composition are represented by the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plots generated using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (PERMANOVA; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.18, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.001 for bacteria/archaea and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.36, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.001 for fungi). The centroid of each time point is represented with a circle outlined in black and the larger circles around the samples represent the variation within each time point. W0, Week 0; W3, Week 3; W6, Week 6; and W9, Week 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Relative abundance of various bacterial/archaeal (<b>A</b>) and fungal (<b>B</b>) taxa during the 9 weeks of soil storage. Bars represent mean abundance of each family at each time point in descending order with standard deviation as error bars. Differences in relative abundances across the four time points were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Statistically significant differences in relative abundance are represented by the different letters (<span class="html-italic">p</span>-value ≤ 0.05). Taxa that were significantly different and had a mean relative abundance of &gt;1% across any of the four time points are depicted in the figure. W0, Week 0; W3, Week 3; W6, Week 6; and W9, Week 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Functional predictions of the bacterial/archaeal and fungal community using FAPROTAX and FUNGuild analyses, respectively. Heatmap represents the mean proportion of the functional groups across the four time points. Functions with statistically significant differences across the time points are represented with an ‘*’ (Kruskal–Wallis test, <span class="html-italic">p</span>-value ≤ 0.05). The fungal guilds, ectomycorrhizal and endophyte, were sub-categorized as fungal parasite-soil saprotroph-undefined saprotroph and litter saprotroph-soil saprotroph-undefined saprotroph, respectively (‡). The mean proportion values range from 0 (yellow) to 0.2 (red). W0, Week 0; W3, Week 3; W6, Week 6; and W9, Week 9.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 7365 KiB  
Article
Distribution Characteristics of Drought Resistance and Disaster Reduction Capability and the Identification of Key Factors—A Case Study of a Typical Area in the Yun–Gui Plateau, China
by Xin Liu, Mengyuan Du, Hongjun Lei, Hongwei Pan, Chongju Shang, Kai Feng and Wenbo Wang
Sustainability 2023, 15(20), 15148; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015148 - 23 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1171
Abstract
Karst areas are characterized by poor surface water storage capacity, which makes them more sensitive to drought events. To enhance drought resistance in karst landform areas, this study focuses on a typical region in the Yun–Gui Plateau of China, specifically Guizhou Province, which [...] Read more.
Karst areas are characterized by poor surface water storage capacity, which makes them more sensitive to drought events. To enhance drought resistance in karst landform areas, this study focuses on a typical region in the Yun–Gui Plateau of China, specifically Guizhou Province, which includes 88 counties and districts. According to the regional characteristics, the index system for the assessment of drought resistance and disaster reduction ability was constructed to include 17 indexes in five evaluation layers, including natural conditions, water conservancy project, economic strength, water usage and water conservation level, and emergency support capacity. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted using a fuzzy evaluation model. Furthermore, the drought resistance and disaster reduction capacity of Guizhou Province was evaluated according to the fulfillment of water supply and water demand under the frequency of 75%, 90%, 95%, 97%, and 99% drought frequency inflow in each research unit. This assessment serves to define the spatial distribution pattern of drought resistance and disaster reduction capability within the province. Additionally, according to the results of the supply–demand balance method, the weight of the main influencing factors in regards to drought resistance and disaster reduction ability was optimized and adjusted to identify the key restricting factors of drought resistance and disaster reduction ability. This research data was obtained from the National Disaster Survey database, aiming to provide practical guidance for drought resistance in Guizhou Province. The research findings show that: (1) the distribution characteristics of drought resistance and disaster reduction capability in Guizhou Province are the most significant in Guiyang City, Liupanshui City, and Anshun City in the southwest, with higher drought resistance and disaster reduction ability found in central region, and lower drought resistance primarily identified in the eastern part of Qiandongnan Prefecture, Tongren City, the southern part of Qiannan Prefecture, and the northwestern part of Bijie City; (2) there are six main influencing factors in the three criterion layers, i.e., hydraulic engineering, emergency drought resistance, and social economy, and their contribution rates are as follows: surface water supply and storage rate > average number of soil moisture monitoring stations > per capita GDP > agricultural emergency drought irrigation rate > regional water supply assurance rate > cultivated land effective irrigation rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Air, Climate Change and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Evaluation flow chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram showing the correlation of water resources between each incoming water frequency and 75% of the incoming water frequency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Spatial distribution map of drought resistance and disaster reduction capability levels. * representing autonomous counties in ethnic regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Spatial distribution diagram of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method results. * representing autonomous counties in ethnic regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Score distribution diagram of the criterion layer of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 13684 KiB  
Article
Effect of Plastic Membrane and Geotextile Cloth Mulching on Soil Moisture and Spring Maize Growth in the Loess–Hilly Region of Yan’an, China
by Zhifeng Jia, Bobo Wu, Wei Wei, Yingjie Chang, Rui Lei, Weiwei Hu and Jun Jiang
Agronomy 2023, 13(10), 2513; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102513 - 29 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1611
Abstract
In order to study the effect of a plastic membrane and geotextile cloth mulching on soil moisture and crop growth in the loess–hilly region, a one-year continuous field monitoring experiment was carried out in Ansai District, City of Yan’an, Shaanxi Province, China. The [...] Read more.
In order to study the effect of a plastic membrane and geotextile cloth mulching on soil moisture and crop growth in the loess–hilly region, a one-year continuous field monitoring experiment was carried out in Ansai District, City of Yan’an, Shaanxi Province, China. The experimentation included three treatments: plastic membrane and geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge (MB), geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge (DB), and bare soil ridge (CK). Soil moisture and water potential sensors were installed to monitor the changes in soil moisture content and water potential at 5, 15, and 30 cm below the furrow surface and meteorological data above the soil surface, and the growth traits, yield, and quality of maize were analyzed. The results showed the following: (1) The soil water-storage capacity of the three treatments dropped to a minimum in the filling stage and gradually recovered in the mature stage. The average water-storage capacity for the MB treatment was 35.5% higher than that for the DB treatment and 85.1% higher than that for the CK treatment, significant throughout the whole growth period. (2) For four types of rainfall events, namely, light, medium, heavy, and storm rainfall, significant responses were observed at 5 cm below the ground for three treatments, and the fastest response was in MB due to its best rain-collection effect. A significant response was also observed at 15 and 30 cm below the surface of the furrow during medium, heavy, and storm rainfall, while no significant difference in response time was found between the three treatments due to the restriction of the soil infiltration capacity. (3) The differences between the three treatments in the agronomic traits of maize, except for plant height and stem thickness, were insignificant (p < 0.05). The seed moisture content and yield for the MB treatment were the highest, with values of 40.33% and 8366 kg/hm2, respectively, followed closely by the DB treatment, with values of 38.61% and 7780 kg/hm2, respectively, and the smallest values were observed in the CK treatment, with values of 35.80% and 6897 kg/hm2, respectively. Compared with those for the CK treatment, the average starch content and the average lipid content for the mulching treatments (MB, DB) decreased by 13.40% and 17.11%, respectively, while the average protein content of maize increased by 7.86%. Overall, a plastic membrane and geotextile cloth mulching could significantly increase soil moisture and spring maize yield due to their better rain-collection effect. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geographical location of the experiment site: (<b>a</b>) Geographic location of the loess–hilly region; (<b>b</b>) Geographic location of the study area; (<b>c</b>) Aerial view of the test area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field test layout: (<b>a</b>) Planar graph; (<b>b</b>) Cutaway drawing; (<b>c</b>) Photograph. MB means plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge, DB means geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge, and CK means bare soil ridge. EM50 is a data logger for sensors. MPS-2 is a soil water potential and soil temperature sensor, and GS3 is a soil moisture sensor. Davis Cup is a wind speed and direction sensor. ECRN-100 is a rain gauge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil moisture characteristic curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Monthly rainfall and evapotranspiration during the growing period: (<b>a</b>) Monthly rainfall; (<b>b</b>) Monthly evaporation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in air temperature and relative humidity during the growing period.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Wind speed (<b>a</b>) and wind direction frequency (<b>b</b>) characteristic diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Differences in soil moisture content at each layer under different treatments. MB: Plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; DB: Geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; CK: Bare soil ridge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Dynamic soil moisture changes from 0 to 30 cm during the growth period. MB: Plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; DB: Geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; CK: Bare soil ridge.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The average soil water storage from 0 to 30 cm in three treatments during the maize growth period. MB: Plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; DB: Geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; CK: Bare soil ridge. Different letters mean significant differences according to LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Effect of different types of rainfall on soil moisture. MB: Plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; DB: Geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; CK: Bare soil ridge. VWC refers to the volumetric water content of the soil. LR, MR, HR, and S stand for light rain, medium rain, heavy rain, and storm rain, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Spring maize height in each treatment. MB: Plastic membrane–geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; DB: Geotextile cloth mulching on the ridge; CK: Bare soil ridge. Different letters mean significant differences according to LSD test at <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5114 KiB  
Article
Effects of Microbial Organic Fertilizer (MOF) Application on Desert Soil Enzyme Activity and Jujube Yield and Quality
by Fanfan Shao, Wanghai Tao, Haokui Yan and Quanjiu Wang
Agronomy 2023, 13(9), 2427; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13092427 - 20 Sep 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1239
Abstract
Developing effective regulatory strategies to enhance irrigation water and fertilizer efficiency in the southern Xinjiang region of China, while simultaneously combatting desertification, is of paramount significance. This study focuses on Chinese jujube in Xinjiang and presents findings from a two-year field experiment aimed [...] Read more.
Developing effective regulatory strategies to enhance irrigation water and fertilizer efficiency in the southern Xinjiang region of China, while simultaneously combatting desertification, is of paramount significance. This study focuses on Chinese jujube in Xinjiang and presents findings from a two-year field experiment aimed at investigating the optimal application strategy of microbial organic fertilizer (MOF). The research aims to provide a scientific foundation for achieving high-quality jujube production. The experiment involved a control group (utilizing only freshwater, referred to as CK) and various combinations of MOF treatments. In 2021, these treatments included M1 (0.6 t/ha), M2 (1.2 t/ha), M3 (1.8 t/ha), and M4 (2.4 t/ha), while in 2022, they encompassed M1 (0.6 t/ha), M2 (1.2 t/ha), M4 (2.4 t/ha), and M5 (4.8 t/ha). Over the two-year trial period, we assessed various indices, including the soil’s physical properties, hydraulic characteristics, soil enzyme activities, and relative chlorophyll content. Additionally, we evaluated jujube yield, quality, and economic benefits. The results indicate that MOF application led to significant improvements in soil conditions. Specifically, the average moisture content and profile water storage of the 0–50 cm soil layer increased by 10.98% to 36.42% and 1.8% to 26.8%, respectively. Moreover, in both the 2021 and 2022 experiments, soil saturated water content (SSWC) and water-holding capacity (WHC) increased by 6.25% to 15.98%, while soil hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and bulk density (BD) decreased by 2.91% to 9.88% and 0.63% to 8.08%, respectively. In 2021, MOF application resulted in significant enhancements in soil enzyme activities, with urease activity increasing by approximately 22.5% to 100.5%, peroxidase activity rising by around 24.2% to 148.5%, and invertase activity augmenting by about 5.4% to 32.9%. Notably, the M4 treatment in 2021 demonstrated a substantial jujube yield increase of approximately 19.22%, elevating from 7.65 t/ha to 9.12 t/ha. Based on comprehensive analysis, this study recommends an optimal MOF application rate of approximately 2.4 t/ha. This approach not only provides robust support for the sustainable development of the jujube industry but also serves as a valuable reference for enhancing local soil resilience against desertification. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Temperature changes during the growing season of the jujube tree in 2021 (<b>A</b>) and 2022 (<b>B</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Jujube planting, irrigation mode and MOF application.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Soil water distribution in the profile of jujube trees during the fruit expansion stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Soil saturated water content, water holding capacity, saturated hydraulic conductivity, soil bulk density, and soil porosity volume in (<b>A</b>) 2021 and (<b>B</b>) 2022. Among the different treatments, the same lowercase letters did not differ from each other, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≥ 0.05. The bars stand for mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Relative chlorophyll content of jujube leaf in (<b>A</b>) 2021 and (<b>B</b>) 2022. Among the different treatments, the same lowercase letters did not differ from each other, <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≥ 0.05. The bars stand for mean ± SD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Correlations among the soil’s hydraulic and physical properties, enzyme activity, physiological growth, yield, quality, and economic benefits. Mean SWC, mean soil water content; mean SWS, mean soil water storage; SSWC, saturated soil water content; Ks, saturated hydraulic conductivity; WHC, water-holding capacity; BD, soil bulk density; SPV, soil porosity volume; UE, urease activity; CE, catalase activity; SE, sucrose activity; RCC, relative chlorophyll content; TA, titrable acid; SS, soluble sugar; FL, flavone; S/A, sugar–acid ratio; NI, net income.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cluster analysis of the soil’s hydraulic and physical properties, enzyme activity, physiological growth, yield, quality, and economic benefits. Mean SWC, mean soil water content; mean SWS, mean soil water storage; SSWC, saturated soil water content; Ks, saturated hydraulic conductivity; WHC, water-holding capacity; BD, soil bulk density; SPV, soil porosity volume; UE, urease activity; CE, catalase activity; SE, sucrose activity; RCC, relative chlorophyll content; TA, titrable acid; SS, soluble sugar; FL, flavone; S/A, sugar–acid ratio; NI, net income.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 2190 KiB  
Article
A Data-Driven Approach for Building the Profile of Water Storage Capacity of Soils
by Jiang Zhou, Ciprian Briciu-Burghina, Fiona Regan and Muhammad Intizar Ali
Sensors 2023, 23(12), 5599; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125599 - 15 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1764
Abstract
The soil water storage capacity is critical for soil management as it drives crop production, soil carbon sequestration, and soil quality and health. It depends on soil textural class, depth, land-use and soil management practices; therefore, the complexity strongly limits its estimation on [...] Read more.
The soil water storage capacity is critical for soil management as it drives crop production, soil carbon sequestration, and soil quality and health. It depends on soil textural class, depth, land-use and soil management practices; therefore, the complexity strongly limits its estimation on a large scale with conventional-process-based approaches. In this paper, a machine learning approach is proposed to build the profile of the soil water storage capacity. A neural network is designed to estimate the soil moisture from the meteorology data input. By taking the soil moisture as a proxy in the modelling, the training captures those impact factors of soil water storage capacity and their nonlinear interaction implicitly without knowing the underlying soil hydrologic processes. An internal vector of the proposed neural network assimilates the soil moisture response to meteorological conditions and is regulated as the profile of the soil water storage capacity. The proposed approach is data-driven. Since the low-cost soil moisture sensors have made soil moisture monitoring simple and the meteorology data are easy to obtain, the proposed approach enables a convenient way of estimating soil water storage capacity in a high sampling resolution and at a large scale. Moreover, an average root mean squared deviation at 0.0307m3/m3 can be achieved in the soil moisture estimation; hence, the trained model can be deployed as an alternative to the expensive sensor networks for continuous soil moisture monitoring. The proposed approach innovatively represents the soil water storage capacity as a vector profile rather than a single value indicator. Compared with the single value indicator, which is common in hydrology, a multidimensional vector can encode more information and thus has a more powerful representation. This can be seen in the anomaly detection demonstrated in the paper, where subtle differences in soil water storage capacity among the sensor sites can be captured even though these sensors are installed on the same grassland. Another merit of vector representation is that advanced numeric methods can be applied to soil analysis. This paper demonstrates such an advantage by clustering sensor sites into groups with the unsupervised K-means clustering on the profile vectors which encapsulate soil characteristics and land properties of each sensor site implicitly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Environmental Sensing and Smart Cities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sensor network deployment. (<b>Left</b>) Johnstown Castle site (red marker) and the map of Ireland; (<b>middle</b>) sensor installation example, showing the probe and the LoRaWAN node; (<b>right</b>) aerial site view showing the sensor locations (1–10), the meteorological station (Met Éireann), and the location of the LoRaWAN Gateway (monitoring station 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>An illustration of a sample LSTM cell [<a href="#B19-sensors-23-05599" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An illustration of a sample LSTM network [<a href="#B7-sensors-23-05599" class="html-bibr">7</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>An illustration of our proposed model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Model testing with 4 months’ data. The grey line indicates average RMSDs for each month.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Profile vector differences along with training epochs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients of 10 sensor sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Soil moisture histograms of sensor sites. (<b>A</b>–<b>F</b>) represent 6 different sensors pair groups. Dark brown color in the histograms represents the overlapped region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Categorization of 9 sensor sites. S stands for sensor site. S9 is excluded as an outlier.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 2072 KiB  
Article
Impacts of Grazing Disturbance on Soil Nitrogen Component Contents and Storages in a Leymus chinensis Meadow Steppe
by Sisi Chen, Miao Wang, Chu Zhang, Tianqi Yu, Xiaoping Xin, Keyu Bai, Xiaoyu Zhu and Ruirui Yan
Agronomy 2023, 13(6), 1574; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061574 - 9 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2084
Abstract
Long-term grazing leads to soil degradation in Inner Mongolia grassland. Based on the Hulunbeier meadow steppe, the variation characteristics of soil nitrogen content and storage in soil layers between 0–40 cm, under six different grazing intensities, and the response of vegetation and other [...] Read more.
Long-term grazing leads to soil degradation in Inner Mongolia grassland. Based on the Hulunbeier meadow steppe, the variation characteristics of soil nitrogen content and storage in soil layers between 0–40 cm, under six different grazing intensities, and the response of vegetation and other physical and chemical properties of soil to grazing were studied. The main results were as follows: (1) Moderate grazing increased soil total nitrogen (TN), soluble total nitrogen (STN) and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) contents, while heavy grazing decreased MBN content. In the year with more rain, heavy grazing increased nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) content and storage, while less rain increased ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) content. (2) The proportion of 0–40 cm nitrogen components showed an upward trend in the year with more rain, and the opposite in the years with less rainfall with the increase of grazing intensity. Soil soluble organic nitrogen (SON) and NO3-N storages decreased and MBN storage increased in rainy years. (3) Soil nitrogen component contents and storages were correlated with plant growth status, soil moisture (SM) and soil bulk density (SBD), and were significantly negatively correlated with soil temperature (ST) and pH (p < 0.05). The content and storage of soil nitrogen were affected by grazing, soil, vegetation, meteorological and other environmental factors. Moderate grazing was more conducive to the improvement of soil nitrogen storage capacity and the healthy development of grassland. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Utilization and Management of Grassland Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of meteorological variation at sample sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Soil nitrogen content dynamics at different grazing intensities over two years. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different grazing intensities (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), different capital letters indicate significant differences between different soil layers (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and no letters indicate no significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamics of soil nitrogen components under different grazing intensities over two years. Note: The small figure on the upper right is the trend of 0–40 nitrogen component ratio. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different grazing intensities (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and no letters indicate no significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Dynamics of soil nitrogen stocks under different grazing intensities over two years. Note: Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between grazing intensities (<span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05), and no letters indicate no significant difference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Correlation of different grazing intensities over two years. * 0.01 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 &lt; <span class="html-italic">p</span> ≤ 0.01; GI: grazing intensity, TN: total nitrogen, STN: soluble total nitrogen, SON: soluble organic nitrogen, NN: NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N, AN: NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N, MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen, TNS: total nitrogen storage, STNS: soluble total nitrogen storage, SONS: soluble organic nitrogen storage, NNS: NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N storage, ANS: NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N storage, MBNS: microbial biomass nitrogen storage, H: height, C: coverage, D: density, AGB: aboveground biomass, ST: soil temperature, SM: soil moisture, SBD: soil bulk density.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 2528 KiB  
Article
Water Dynamics and Hydraulic Functions in Sandy Soils: Limitations to Sugarcane Cultivation in Southern Brazil
by Jessica Lima Viana, Jorge Luiz Moretti de Souza, André Carlos Auler, Ricardo Augusto de Oliveira, Renã Moreira Araújo, Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, Daniel Carneiro de Abreu and Wininton Mendes da Silva
Sustainability 2023, 15(9), 7456; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097456 - 1 May 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2221
Abstract
Crop cultivation on sandy soils is susceptible to water stress. Therefore, we determined the physical-hydric attributes of a Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol) in northwestern Paraná state, Brazil. Soil samples were collected at depth ranges of 0 to 0.2 m, 0.2 to 0.4 m, [...] Read more.
Crop cultivation on sandy soils is susceptible to water stress. Therefore, we determined the physical-hydric attributes of a Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol) in northwestern Paraná state, Brazil. Soil samples were collected at depth ranges of 0 to 0.2 m, 0.2 to 0.4 m, and 0.4 to 0.6 m. We measured clay, silt, sand, fine and coarse sand contents, soil particle density, soil bulk density, total porosity, microporosity, and macroporosity. We also measured soil characteristics such as saturated and unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivities, pore distribution, water retention, available water capacity, and easily available water. We also estimated soil moisture, matric potential at field capacity, and time at field capacity. Validation of associations among these soil physical-hydric attributes was performed using principal component analysis. For the sandy soils analyzed, the distributions of coarse and fine sand fractions were measured for better evaluation of the soil’s physical and hydric attributes. Higher coarse sand contents increased soil hydraulic conductivities, maximum pore diameter, and macroporosity while reducing microporosity. Fine sand content reduced conductivity and increased soil water retention in subsurface layers. Simulated sugarcane yield increased with soil water storage. These results support improving crop simulation modeling of sugarcane to support sustainable intensification in regions with sandy soils. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Agricultural Development Economics and Policy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Saturated (K<sub>S</sub>) conductivity with error bars in cm/hour; (<b>b</b>) unsaturated (K(θ)) hydraulic conductivity versus volumetric water content; and (<b>c</b>) versus matric potential in the soil layers 0 to 0.20 m (m), 0.2 to 0.4 m, and 0.4 to 0.6 m for the Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol) at the Sugarcane Genetic Improvement Program Experimental Station cultivated with sugarcane in Paranavaí, Paraná state, Brazil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The water retention curve of the Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol) in the layers (<b>a</b>) 0 to 0.2 m; (<b>b</b>) 0.2 to 0.4 m; and (<b>c</b>) 0.4 to 0.6 m. The fitted values are accompanied by the confidence band for the predicted value.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pore distribution curve for soil layers at depths of 0 to 0.2 m, 0.2 to 0.4 m, and 0.4 to 0.6 m of Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol) used for sugarcane cultivation at the Experimental Station of the Sugarcane Genetic Improvement Program at the Federal University of Paraná and the Inter-University Network for the Development of Sugarcane Energy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Water in the soil (mm) for different percentages of available soil water capacity (AWC<sub>1</sub> and AWC<sub>2</sub>) and easily available water (EAW<sub>1</sub> and EAW<sub>2</sub>) and for different soil layers (m).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) of the physical-hydric attributes of the Latossolo Vermelho distrófico (Oxisol), cultivated with sugarcane in the Experimental Station of the Sugarcane Genetic Improvement Program at the Federal University of Paraná and the Inter-University Network for the Development of Sugarcane Energy. Labels for (1) “dmax” and “Coarse” and (2) “Clay” and “Micro” slightly overlap with each other due to close proximity of these two pairs of vectors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Sugarcane yield model validated from 12 years of field data from UFPR and RIDESA by Viana et al., 2023 [<a href="#B34-sustainability-15-07456" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulated sugarcane stalk yield (TCH = t/ha) as a function of growing degree days during development phase I (ADD<sub>I</sub>) and soil water storage during development phase II (SWS<sub>II</sub>) using both AWC and EAW (100%), with the logarithmic transformation of the validated model by Viana et al., 2023 [<a href="#B34-sustainability-15-07456" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop