[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (477)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = gait monitoring

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 1100 KiB  
Article
Clinical Whole-Body Gait Characterization Using a Single RGB-D Sensor
by Lukas Boborzi, Johannes Bertram, Roman Schniepp, Julian Decker and Max Wuehr
Sensors 2025, 25(2), 333; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020333 - 8 Jan 2025
Abstract
Instrumented gait analysis is widely used in clinical settings for the early detection of neurological disorders, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating fall risk. However, the gold-standard marker-based 3D motion analysis is limited by high time and personnel demands. Advances in computer vision now [...] Read more.
Instrumented gait analysis is widely used in clinical settings for the early detection of neurological disorders, monitoring disease progression, and evaluating fall risk. However, the gold-standard marker-based 3D motion analysis is limited by high time and personnel demands. Advances in computer vision now enable markerless whole-body tracking with high accuracy. Here, we present vGait, a comprehensive 3D gait assessment method using a single RGB-D sensor and state-of-the-art pose-tracking algorithms. vGait was validated in healthy participants during frontal- and sagittal-perspective walking. Performance was comparable across perspectives, with vGait achieving high accuracy in detecting initial and final foot contacts (F1 scores > 95%) and reliably quantifying spatiotemporal gait parameters (e.g., stride time, stride length) and whole-body coordination metrics (e.g., arm swing and knee angle ROM) at different levels of granularity (mean, step-to-step variability, side asymmetry). The flexibility, accuracy, and minimal resource requirements of vGait make it a valuable tool for clinical and non-clinical applications, including outpatient clinics, medical practices, nursing homes, and community settings. By enabling efficient and scalable gait assessment, vGait has the potential to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic workflows and improve access to clinical mobility monitoring. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Experimental setup. (<b>A</b>) Participants walked along a marked figure-eight path with a diagonal length of 5.1 m, allowing for both frontal-perspective and sagittal-perspective walking. (<b>B</b>) A total of 17 displayed keypoints were analyzed to calculate spatiotemporal gait cycle parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Definition of spatial gait characteristics. (<b>A</b>) Stride length is the distance between two successive heel contacts of the same foot, while stride width is the perpendicular distance from one heel contact to the line connecting two successive heel contacts of the opposite foot (i.e., the line of progression). The FPA is the angular deviation between the foot midline and the line of progression. (<b>B</b>) Arm swing ROM is the maximal angular displacement of the line connecting the shoulder and wrist in the walking direction within a gait cycle. (<b>C</b>) Knee ROM is defined as the angular difference between the maximum extension and flexion of the knee during the gait cycle. Exemplary knee joint angle curves (mean ± SD) are shown from vGait (red line) and the ground truth (gray line). Abbreviations: FPA, foot progression angle; ROM, range of motion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Histograms illustrating the temporal agreement (t<sub>gold standard</sub>–t<sub>vGait</sub>) of initial and final foot contacts identified by vGait compared to the gold standard during (<b>A</b>) frontal-perspective walking and (<b>B</b>) sagittal-perspective walking.</p>
Full article ">
50 pages, 2370 KiB  
Systematic Review
Movement Disorders and Smart Wrist Devices: A Comprehensive Study
by Andrea Caroppo, Andrea Manni, Gabriele Rescio, Anna Maria Carluccio, Pietro Aleardo Siciliano and Alessandro Leone
Sensors 2025, 25(1), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25010266 - 5 Jan 2025
Viewed by 735
Abstract
In the medical field, there are several very different movement disorders, such as tremors, Parkinson’s disease, or Huntington’s disease. A wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms characterizes them. It is evident that in the modern era, the use of smart wrist devices, [...] Read more.
In the medical field, there are several very different movement disorders, such as tremors, Parkinson’s disease, or Huntington’s disease. A wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms characterizes them. It is evident that in the modern era, the use of smart wrist devices, such as smartwatches, wristbands, and smart bracelets is spreading among all categories of people. This diffusion is justified by the limited costs, ease of use, and less invasiveness (and consequently greater acceptability) than other types of sensors used for health status monitoring. This systematic review aims to synthesize research studies using smart wrist devices for a specific class of movement disorders. Following PRISMA-S guidelines, 130 studies were selected and analyzed. For each selected study, information is provided relating to the smartwatch/wristband/bracelet model used (whether it is commercial or not), the number of end-users involved in the experimentation stage, and finally the characteristics of the benchmark dataset possibly used for testing. Moreover, some articles also reported the type of raw data extracted from the smart wrist device, the implemented designed algorithmic pipeline, and the data classification methodology. It turned out that most of the studies have been published in the last ten years, showing a growing interest in the scientific community. The selected articles mainly investigate the relationship between smart wrist devices and Parkinson’s disease. Epilepsy and seizure detection are also research topics of interest, while there are few papers analyzing gait disorders, Huntington’s Disease, ataxia, or Tourette Syndrome. However, the results of this review highlight the difficulties still present in the use of the smartwatch/wristband/bracelet for the identified categories of movement disorders, despite the advantages these technologies could bring in the dissemination of low-cost solutions usable directly within living environments and without the need for caregivers or medical personnel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Sensors and Signal Processing in Industry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Main functionalities (already or being integrated) for smart wrist devices in the market.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Classification of movement disorders with an approximate indication of worldwide incidence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flow diagram generated with PRISMA-S methodology, depicting the reviewers’ process of finding published data on the considered topic and how they decided whether to include it in the review.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of the articles by year of publication.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distribution of the articles by movement disorder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Categorization of the articles related to PD movement disorder.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Categorization of articles related to epilepsy or seizure detection, based on type of wrist device.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Graphical representation of the distribution of articles with respect to classification methodologies.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 5012 KiB  
Review
Structure-to-Human Interaction (H2SI): Pedestrian Response to Oscillating Footbridges and Considerations on Their Structural Control and Health Monitoring
by Aurora Caloni, Matteo Morfino, Marco Civera and Cecilia Surace
Infrastructures 2025, 10(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10010009 - 3 Jan 2025
Viewed by 329
Abstract
This review paper investigates the current state of research on structure-to-human interaction (S2HI) in the monitoring and control of cyclo-pedestrian footbridges, focusing specifically on the biodynamic effects of oscillations on pedestrians. Its aim is, therefore, twofold: In the first half, it examines the [...] Read more.
This review paper investigates the current state of research on structure-to-human interaction (S2HI) in the monitoring and control of cyclo-pedestrian footbridges, focusing specifically on the biodynamic effects of oscillations on pedestrians. Its aim is, therefore, twofold: In the first half, it examines the limited but evolving understanding of human gait responses to vertical and horizontal vibrations at frequencies and amplitudes characteristic of footbridge dynamics. The second half includes a detailed analysis of various modelling strategies for simulating pedestrian and crowd dynamics, emphasising the movements and stationary behaviours induced by structural vibrations. The aim is to highlight the strengths and limitations of these modelling approaches, particularly their capability to incorporate biomechanical factors in pedestrian responses. The research findings indicate that existing studies predominantly focus on human-to-structure interaction (HSI), often neglecting the reciprocal effects of S2HI, with many results in the literature failing to adequately address the biomechanics of single pedestrians or crowds experiencing structural vibrations on cyclo-pedestrian bridges. This gap underscores the need for more precise and comprehensive studies in the field to improve the understanding of dynamic interactions between single or multiple walking individuals and footbridge vibrations, especially for vulnerable and elderly people with limited mobility. Furthermore, considerations regarding the impact of Structural Control and Health Monitoring to alleviate these issues are briefly discussed, highlighting the potential to optimise footbridge performance in terms of pedestrian comfort. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Health Monitoring in Bridge Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Millennium Bridge in London (UK) looking north.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Solférino Bridge in Paris (FR) looking north.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>AHRS attached to a foot used for PDR (pedestrian dead-reckoning, a navigation technique used to determine the position and orientation of a walker [<a href="#B51-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">51</a>]). Retrieved from [<a href="#B50-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Single-human models, as discussed in Caprani [<a href="#B68-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">68</a>], showing a simply supported beam as a simplification of a footbridge structure: (<b>a</b>) MF model of a pedestrian; (<b>b</b>) MM model; (<b>c</b>) SMD model. The black arrows indicate the direction of motion, while the red ones indicate the point of application.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The inverted pendulum models of a pedestrian: (<b>a</b>) body axes; (<b>b</b>) forward movement, adapted from [<a href="#B80-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">80</a>]; (<b>c</b>) lateral movement, adapted from [<a href="#B79-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">79</a>]; (<b>d</b>) hypothetical model in a 3D environment for combined use.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Schematic of the spring-damper bipedal (biomechanical walking) model (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="sans-serif">θ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> is the angle of attack), also compared with the kinematics of an inverted pendulum of the same length.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Body segments (<b>a</b>) and their spherical coordinates (<b>b</b>) as investigated in [<a href="#B52-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Pictorial representation of a crowd moving in one direction. Retrieved from [<a href="#B95-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">95</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Some examples of dynamically monitored slender footbridges: (<b>a</b>) the Pedro e Inês footbridge (from [<a href="#B108-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">108</a>]); (<b>b</b>) the Downing Hall footbridge (from [<a href="#B109-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">109</a>]); (<b>c</b>) the Eeklo footbridge (from [<a href="#B110-infrastructures-10-00009" class="html-bibr">110</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) the Ponte del Mare footbridge in Pescara, Italy.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The several kinds of dampers set on the Millenium Bridge after the 2001–2002 retrofit: (<b>a</b>) vertical-to-ground dampers; (<b>b</b>) chevron dampers; (<b>c</b>) pier dampers; (<b>d</b>) moving end of pier dampers; (<b>e</b>) TMDs.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1370 KiB  
Article
Real-Time Neuropsychological Testing for Hydrocephalus: Ultra-Fast Neuropsychological Testing During Infusion and Tap Test in Patients with Idiopathic Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus
by Ilaria Guarracino, Sara Fabbro, Daniele Piccolo, Serena D’Agostini, Miran Skrap, Enrico Belgrado, Marco Vindigni, Francesco Tuniz and Barbara Tomasino
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010036 - 1 Jan 2025
Viewed by 553
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is a validated procedure for the treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. To select shunt-responsive patients, infusion and tap tests can be used. Only gait is evaluated after the procedure to establish a potential improvement. In this study, we present our [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is a validated procedure for the treatment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. To select shunt-responsive patients, infusion and tap tests can be used. Only gait is evaluated after the procedure to establish a potential improvement. In this study, we present our Hydro-Real-Time Neuropsychological Testing protocol to assess the feasibility of performing an ultra-fast assessment of patients during the infusion and tap test. Methods: We tested 57 patients during the infusion and tap test to obtain real-time feedback on their cognitive status. Data were obtained immediately before the infusion phase (T0), when the pressure plateau was reached (T1), and immediately after cerebrospinal fluid subtraction (T2). Based on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, 63.15% of the patients presented a resistance to outflow > 12 mmHg/mL/min, while 88% had a positive tap test response. Results: Compared to T0, cerebrospinal fluid removal significantly improved performance on tasks exploring executive functions (counting backward, p < 0.001; verbal fluency, p < 0.001). Patients were significantly faster at counting backward at T2 vs. T1 (p < 0.05) and at T2 vs. T0 (p < 0.001) and were significantly faster at counting forward at T2 vs. T1 (p < 0.005), suggesting an improvement in speed at T2. There was a significantly smaller index at T1 vs. T0 (p = 0.005) and at T2 vs. T0 (p < 0.001), suggesting a more marked improvement in patients’ executive abilities at T2 and a smaller improvement at T1. Regarding verbal fluency, patients were worse at T1 vs. T0 (p < 0.001) and at T2 vs. T0 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients’ performance can be monitored during the infusion and tap test as significant changes in executive functions are observable. In future, this protocol might help improve patients’ selection for surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neuromuscular and Movement Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Study design and Hydro-RTNT setting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Patients’ triad of symptoms (<b>A</b>), CSF dynamics results (<b>B</b>), patients’ ACE-R equivalent scores (ranging from 0 = pathological, 1 = borderline, to 4) (<b>C</b>), and ACE-R total score pre- and post-CSF tap test (<b>D</b>). Error bars denote standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Results of the Hydro-RTNT. Mean completion time (seconds) of the forward (<b>A</b>) and backward (<b>B</b>) counting task and the first effort score (<b>C</b>) and the reverse index effect (<b>D</b>). Mean number of words produced on the verbal fluency task (<b>E</b>), mean number of correctly named actions (<b>F</b>) and correctly recognized degraded letters (<b>G</b>); correlation between P_plateau and reverse index effect (<b>H</b>). Error bars denote standard deviations.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 53362 KiB  
Article
Force–Position Coordinated Compliance Control in the Adhesion/Detachment Process of Space Climbing Robot
by Changtai Wen, Pengfei Zheng, Zhenhao Jing, Chongbin Guo and Chao Chen
Aerospace 2025, 12(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12010020 - 31 Dec 2024
Viewed by 321
Abstract
Adhesion-based space climbing robots, with their flexibility and multi-functional capabilities, are seen as a promising candidate for in-orbit maintenance. However, challenges such as uncertain adhesion establishment, unexpected detachment, and body motion unsteadiness in microgravity environments persist. To address these issues, this paper proposes [...] Read more.
Adhesion-based space climbing robots, with their flexibility and multi-functional capabilities, are seen as a promising candidate for in-orbit maintenance. However, challenges such as uncertain adhesion establishment, unexpected detachment, and body motion unsteadiness in microgravity environments persist. To address these issues, this paper proposes a coordinated force–position compliance control method that integrates novel adhesion establishment and rotational detachment strategies, integrated into the gait schedule for a space climbing robot. By monitoring the foot-end reaction forces in real time, the proposed method establishes adhesion without risking damaging the spacecraft exterior, and smooth detachment is achieved by rotating the foot joint instead of direct pulling. These strategies are dedicated to reducing unnecessary control actions and, accordingly, the required adhesion forces in all feet, reducing the possibility of unexpected detachment. Climbing experiments have been conducted in a suspension-based gravity compensation system to examine the merits of the proposed method. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed rotational detaching method decreases the required pulling force by 65.5% compared to direct pulling, thus greatly reducing the disturbance introduced to the robot body and other supporting legs. When stepping on an obstacle, the compliant control method is shown to reduce unnecessarily aggressive control actions and result in a reduction in relevant normal and shear adhesion forces in the supporting legs by 44.8% and 35.1%, respectively, compared to a PID controller. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Mechanisms and Robots)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The mission scenario of a spaceborne climbing robot adhering and climbing on the solar wing of a spacecraft.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comprehensive modeling of the robot. (<b>a</b>) Overall structure of the robot. (<b>b</b>) Mathematical model of the robot. (<b>c</b>) Schematic of leg design with 4 DoFs (yaw–pitch–pitch–pitch).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Dynamic constraints satisfied by the robot’s adhesion. (<b>a</b>) Microstructure of adhesive materials on a single foot in contact with the environment. (<b>b</b>) Constraints of linear acceleration and adhesion force. (<b>c</b>) Constraints of angular acceleration and adhesion force.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Control frame.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Four-phase gait sequence.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Tanh activation function. (<b>a</b>) Tanh function and its derivative curve. (<b>b</b>) Influence of amplitude factor <span class="html-italic">m</span> on the tanh function. (<b>c</b>) Influence of scaling factor <span class="html-italic">n</span> on the tanh function.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Single-leg motion phase within one gait cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variation in joint angles in the single-leg joint motor over one gait cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The compliant controller modifies the desired position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Control diagram of the force–position coordinated compliant controller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Time-varying curve of foot-end <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis position under different parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Admittance response of a single leg under decoupled external forces in the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-plane. (<b>a</b>) Admittance response of a single leg in the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis direction. (<b>b</b>) Admittance response of a single leg in the <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Joint torque response of the equivalent admittance model under decoupled external forces. (<b>a</b>) Application of external force in the <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis direction. (<b>b</b>) Application of external force in the <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis direction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Experimental setup using suspension gravity compensation system. (<b>a</b>) Suspension frame of the gravity compensation system. (<b>b</b>) Experimental setup using gravity compensation system. (<b>c</b>) Data collection device used in the experiment. (<b>d</b>) Suspended robot used in the experiment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of contact-force data during robot motion cycles with and without environmental contact.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Terrain adaptation of robot leg joints in a step change in surface height. (<b>a</b>) No contact detection, adhesion not achieved. (<b>b</b>) Contact detection, adhesion achieved.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Terrain adaptation of foot-end joint in a step change in surface height. (<b>a</b>) Foot orientation without IMU compensation is non-vertical. (<b>b</b>) Foot orientation with IMU compensation is vertical.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Schematic of rotational detachment. (<b>a</b>) Detachment without joint rotation. (<b>b</b>) Detachment with joint rotation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison of adhesive force at foot-end during periodic stepping and detaching using different detaching strategies. (<b>a</b>) Normal force. (<b>b</b>) Shear force.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Foot adhesion force experimental scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of foot-end shear forces of the supporting leg while the neighbor leg undergoes periodic stepping and detaching, using PID and admittance control. (<b>a</b>) Normal force. (<b>b</b>) Shear force.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Experiment on robot climbing a vertical solar panel, simulating microgravity conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 23
<p>Admittance response of a single leg under decoupled external forces in the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>-plane. (<b>a</b>) Comparison of <span class="html-italic">x</span>-axis angular velocity variation. (<b>b</b>) Comparison of <span class="html-italic">y</span>-axis angular velocity variation. (<b>c</b>) Comparison of <span class="html-italic">z</span>-axis angular velocity variation.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 5119 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Effect of Sampling Frequency on Real-World Mobility, Sedentary Behaviour, Physical Activity and Sleep Outcomes Measured with Wearable Devices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Feasibility, Usability and Practical Considerations
by Javad Sarvestan, Kenneth F. Baker and Silvia Del Din
Bioengineering 2025, 12(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12010018 - 28 Dec 2024
Viewed by 413
Abstract
Modern treat-to-target management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves titration of drug therapy to achieve remission, requiring close monitoring of disease activity through frequent clinical assessments. Accelerometry offers a novel method for continuous remote monitoring of RA activity by capturing fluctuations in mobility, sedentary [...] Read more.
Modern treat-to-target management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) involves titration of drug therapy to achieve remission, requiring close monitoring of disease activity through frequent clinical assessments. Accelerometry offers a novel method for continuous remote monitoring of RA activity by capturing fluctuations in mobility, sedentary behaviours, physical activity and sleep patterns over prolonged periods without the expense, inconvenience and environmental impact of extra hospital visits. We aimed to (a) assess the feasibility, usability and acceptability of wearable devices in patients with active RA; (b) investigate the multivariate relationships within the dataset; and (c) explore the robustness of accelerometry outcomes to downsampling to facilitate future prolonged monitoring. Eleven people with active RA newly starting an arthritis drug completed clinical assessments at 4-week intervals for 12 weeks. Participants wore an Axivity AX6 wrist device (sampling frequency 100 Hz) for 7 days after each clinical assessment. Measures of macro gait (volume, pattern and variability), micro gait (pace, rhythm, variability, asymmetry and postural control of walking), sedentary behaviour (standing, sitting and lying) and physical activity (moderate to vigorous physical activity [MVPA], sustained inactive bouts [SIBs]) and sleep outcomes (sleep duration, wake up after sleep onset, number of awakenings) were recorded. Feasibility, usability and acceptability of wearable devices were assessed using Rabinovich’s questionnaire, principal component (PC) analysis was used to investigate the multivariate relationships within the dataset, and Bland–Altman plots (bias and Limits of Agreement) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used to test the robustness of outcomes sampled at 100 Hz versus downsampled at 50 Hz and 25 Hz. Wearable devices obtained high feasibility, usability and acceptability scores among participants. Macro gait outcomes and MVPA (first PC) and micro gait outcomes and number of SIBs (second PC) exhibited the strongest loadings, with these first two PCs accounting for 40% of the variance of the dataset. Furthermore, these device metrics were robust to downsampling, showing good to excellent agreements (ICC ≥ 0.75). We identified two main domains of mobility, physical activity and sleep outcomes of people with RA: micro gait outcomes plus MVPA and micro gait outcomes plus number of SIBs. Combined with the high usability and acceptability of wearable devices and the robustness of outcomes to downsampling, our real-world data supports the feasibility of accelerometry for prolonged remote monitoring of RA disease activity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technological Advances for Gait and Balance Assessment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Graphical abstract
Full article ">Figure 1
<p>Study protocol: phase 1—laboratory visit including clinical tests and device attachment; phase 2—7-day monitoring including real-world assessment using lower back and wrist devices and feasibility, usability and acceptability questionnaires; phase 3—raw data management including data export, downsampling and processing; and phase 4—data analysis including sleep, sedentary behaviour, and digital mobility outcomes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Interactions with lower back and wristband devices throughout 44 assessments (11 participants × 4 time points). (<b>b</b>) Overall usability score to lower back and wristband devices. (<b>c</b>) Responses given to the usability questionnaire (%). Q1: How much trouble did you have getting started with the wearable devices? Q2: The wearable devices were easy to put on/take off. Q3: I experienced technical problems with the wearable devices. Q4: The wearable devices interfered with my normal activities. Q5: I felt comfortable wearing the wearable devices. Q6: I felt embarrassed wearing the wearable devices. Q7: The instructions on how to use the wearable devices were clear. Q8: Using the wearable devices on a daily basis was easy. Q9: The wearable devices were bulky/heavy. Q10: The wearable devices bothered me in bed. Q11: I felt my privacy was invaded by the wearable devices. Q12: If my doctor would like to use the wearable devices to assess my arthritis, I would be willing to wear them and use them for [duration]. The usability questionnaire responses are categorised based on acceptability (Q4, Q5, Q6, Q9, Q10, Q11, and Q12), usability (Q1, Q2, Q7, and Q8), and feasibility (Q3) themes. Responses are colour-coded on a scale from red (score = 1 indicating the least favourable response) to green (score = 5 indicating the most favourable response). In this questionnaire, “wearable devices” pertains to the lower back and wrist devices [<a href="#B21-bioengineering-12-00018" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Scree plot of percentage of explained variance by the first 10 principal components. (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Quality of representation (<b>b</b>) and directionality (<b>c</b>) of all variables in the first two principal components.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bland–Altman and density plots of selected mobility, sedentary behaviour, physical activity and sleep outcomes from the lower back (black) and wrist (green) devices at 50 Hz and 25 Hz versus 100 Hz. Full sets of graphs are provided in the <a href="#app1-bioengineering-12-00018" class="html-app">Supplementary Materials</a>.</p>
Full article ">
10 pages, 1235 KiB  
Case Report
Evaluation of the Timed Up and Go Test in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Using Inertial Sensors
by Elina Gianzina, Christos K. Yiannakopoulos, Georgios Kalinterakis, Spilios Delis and Efstathios Chronopoulos
Int. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 5(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm5010002 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 247
Abstract
Background: There has been a growing interest in using inertial sensors to explore the temporal aspects of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The current study aimed to analyze the spatiotemporal parameters and phases of the TUG test in patients with knee [...] Read more.
Background: There has been a growing interest in using inertial sensors to explore the temporal aspects of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The current study aimed to analyze the spatiotemporal parameters and phases of the TUG test in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and compare the results with those of non-arthritic individuals. Methods: This study included 20 patients with KOA and 60 non-arthritic individuals aged 65 to 84 years. All participants performed the TUG test, and 17 spatiotemporal parameters and phase data were collected wirelessly using the BTS G-Walk inertial sensor. Results: Significant mobility impairments were observed in KOA patients, including slower gait speed, impaired sit-to-stand transitions, and reduced turning efficiency. These findings highlight functional deficits in individuals with KOA compared to their non-arthritic counterparts. Conclusions: The results emphasize the need for targeted physiotherapy interventions, such as quadriceps strengthening, balance training, and gait retraining, to address these deficits. However, the study is limited by its small sample size, gender imbalance, and limited validation of the BTS G-Walk device. Future research should include larger, more balanced cohorts, validate sensor reliability, and conduct longitudinal studies. Despite these limitations, the findings align with previous research and underscore the potential of inertial sensors in tailoring rehabilitation strategies and monitoring progress in KOA patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The G-walk inertial sensor device was placed in a pocket of a semi-elastic belt positioned above the iliac wings, at the level of the L4 lumbar vertebra.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The report of the TUG test, as is provided by the dedicated G-Studio software.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The G-Studio software provides a graphic representation of the various phases of the TUG test.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1076 KiB  
Article
BagStacking: An Integrated Ensemble Learning Approach for Freezing of Gait Detection in Parkinson’s Disease
by Seffi Cohen, Nurit Cohen-Inger and Lior Rokach
Information 2024, 15(12), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120822 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 364
Abstract
This study introduces BagStacking, an innovative ensemble learning framework designed to enhance the detection of freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) using accelerometer data. By synergistically combining bagging’s variance reduction with stacking’s sophisticated blending mechanisms, BagStacking achieves superior predictive performance. Evaluated [...] Read more.
This study introduces BagStacking, an innovative ensemble learning framework designed to enhance the detection of freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) using accelerometer data. By synergistically combining bagging’s variance reduction with stacking’s sophisticated blending mechanisms, BagStacking achieves superior predictive performance. Evaluated on a comprehensive PD dataset provided by the Michael J. Fox Foundation, BagStacking attained a mean average precision (MAP) of 0.306, surpassing standalone LightGBM and traditional stacking methods. Furthermore, BagStacking demonstrated superior area under the curve (AUC) metrics across key FOG event classes. Specifically, it achieved AUCs of 0.88 for start hesitation, 0.90 for turning, and 0.84 for walking events, outperforming multistrategy ensemble, regular stacking, and LightGBM baselines. Additionally, BagStacking exhibited reduced runtime compared to other ensemble approaches, making it suitable for real-time clinical monitoring. These results underscore BagStacking’s effectiveness in addressing the variability inherent in FOG detection, thereby contributing to improved patient care in PD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Machine Learning in Human Activity Recognition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>BagStacking method overview: <b>D</b>—Bootstrap sampling the training set S, <b>M</b>—Training the base models, <b>P</b>—Apply the base models on the original training set, <b>M’</b>—Train the meta learner on the base models predictions, <b><math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>g</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mi>k</mi> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>g</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math></b>—Apply base models to new instance; feed outputs to meta-learner for final prediction.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Raw accelerometer data for the vertical (AccV), mediolateral (AccML), and anteroposterior (AccAP) axes over a 5-s window.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of feature transformations: time-domain features (mean, standard deviation), frequency-domain features (PSD mean, PSD median), and wavelet-domain features (wavelet coefficient means at levels 0 and 1) for the first five windows.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>AUC comparison of different methods across FOG event classes. BagStacking consistently outperforms other methods in start hesitation, turning, and walking event classes.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 5658 KiB  
Article
Applying Multi-Purpose Commercial Inertial Sensors for Monitoring Equine Locomotion in Equestrian Training
by Christina Fercher, Julia Bartsch, Steffen Kluge, Franziska Schneider, Anna M. Liedtke, Axel Schleichardt and Olaf Ueberschär
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 8170; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248170 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 474
Abstract
Inappropriate, excessive, or overly strenuous training of sport horses can result in long-term injury, including the premature cessation of a horse’s sporting career. As a countermeasure, this study demonstrates the easy implementation of a biomechanical load monitoring system consisting of five commercial, multi-purpose [...] Read more.
Inappropriate, excessive, or overly strenuous training of sport horses can result in long-term injury, including the premature cessation of a horse’s sporting career. As a countermeasure, this study demonstrates the easy implementation of a biomechanical load monitoring system consisting of five commercial, multi-purpose inertial sensor units non-invasively attached to the horse’s distal limbs and trunk. From the data obtained, specific parameters for evaluating gait and limb loads are derived, providing the basis for objective exercise load management and successful injury prevention. Applied under routine in-the-field training conditions, our pilot study results show that tri-axial peak impact limb load increases progressively from walk to trot to canter, in analogy to stride frequency. While stance and swing phases shorten systematically with increasing riding speed across subjects, longitudinal and lateral load asymmetry are affected by gait at an individual level, revealing considerable variability between and within individual horses. This individualized, everyday approach facilitates gaining valuable insights into specific training effects and responses to changing environmental factors in competitive sport horses. It promises to be of great value in optimizing exercise management in equestrian sports to benefit animal welfare and long-term health in the future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inertial Sensing System for Motion Monitoring)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Attachment and positioning of the IMUs on the horse. (<b>a</b>) IMU attachment wallet for the boots with the Xsens DOT sensor (black) in the upper part of the wallet and the Xsens MTw Awinda sensor (orange) on the lower part; (<b>b</b>) placement on the cannon bones; (<b>c</b>) alignment of the local coordinate systems of each sensor pair.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sample of a time series of the tri-axial acceleration of the four limbs (blue) as well as the corresponding angular velocity (orange) of the sagittal plane for gait analysis in walk, as obtained with the MTw Awinda sensors. Red circles indicate the hoof-on and cyan circles the hoof-off event. The black asterisks represent the start and end of a gait cycle, as highlighted in grey in the image on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sample of a time series of the tri-axial acceleration of the four limbs (blue) as well as the corresponding angular velocity (orange) of the sagittal plane for gait analysis in trot, as obtained with the MTw Awinda sensors. Red circles indicate the hoof-on and cyan circles the hoof-off event. The black asterisks represent the start and end of a gait cycle, as highlighted in grey in the image on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Sample of a time series of the tri-axial acceleration of the four limbs (blue) and the corresponding angular velocity (orange) of the sagittal plane for gait analysis in a right-lead canter on a straight line walk as obtained with the MTw Awinda sensors. Red circles indicate the hoof-on and cyan circles the hoof-off event. The black asterisks represent the start and end of a gait cycle, as highlighted in grey in the image on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Sample of a time series of the tri-axial acceleration of the four limbs (blue) as well as the corresponding angular velocity (orange) of the sagittal plane for gait analysis (MTw Awinda sensors). Red circles indicate the hoof-on and cyan circles the hoof-off event. The black asterisks represent the start and end of a gait cycle, as highlighted in grey in the image on the right.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of results of the sensor types Xsens MTw Awinda (abscissa) vs. Xsens DOT (ordinate) for tri-axial peak impact acceleration magnitudes during walk, trot, and canter, as exemplarily sampled for three horses (colours). The inset shows the corresponding Bland–Altman plot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cohort means and distributions of (<b>a</b>) stride frequency, (<b>b</b>) stance duration, (<b>c</b>) PILL, and (<b>d</b>) swing duration across different gaits for the cohort of 20 horses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Cohort means and distribution of (<b>a</b>) cohort longitudinal index <span class="html-italic">(LongAI</span>) and (<b>b</b>) individual <span class="html-italic">LongAI</span> for the cohort of 20 horses. The 20 different colours in (<b>b</b>) from red to magenta illustrate the 20 individual horses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Mean lateral asymmetry index (<span class="html-italic">LatAI</span>) of the (<b>a</b>) forelimbs and (<b>b</b>) hindlimbs in terms of gait for the cohort of 20 horses.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 2157 KiB  
Article
Wearable Fabric System for Sarcopenia Detection
by Zhenhe Huang, Qiuqian Ou, Dan Li, Yuanyi Feng, Liangling Cai, Yue Hu and Hongwei Chu
Biosensors 2024, 14(12), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14120622 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 538
Abstract
Sarcopenia has been a serious concern in the context of an increasingly aging global population. Existing detection methods for sarcopenia are severely constrained by cumbersome devices, the necessity for specialized personnel, and controlled experimental environments. In this study, we developed an innovative wearable [...] Read more.
Sarcopenia has been a serious concern in the context of an increasingly aging global population. Existing detection methods for sarcopenia are severely constrained by cumbersome devices, the necessity for specialized personnel, and controlled experimental environments. In this study, we developed an innovative wearable fabric system based on conductive fabric and flexible sensor array. This fabric system demonstrates remarkable pressure-sensing capabilities, with a high sensitivity of 18.8 kPa−1 and extraordinary stability. It also exhibits excellent flexibility for wearable applications. By interacting with different parts of the human body, it facilitates the monitoring of various physiological activities, such as pulse dynamics, finger movements, speaking, and ambulation. Moreover, this fabric system can be seamlessly integrated into sole to track critical indicators of sarcopenia patients, such as walking speed and gait. Clinical evaluations have shown that this fabric system can effectively detect variations in indicators relevant to sarcopenia patients, proving that it offers a straightforward and promising approach for the diagnosis and assessment of sarcopenia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic illustration of the sarcopenia patient. (<b>B</b>) Exploded-view schematic of the fabric-based piezoresistive sensing system. (<b>C</b>) Illustration of a single piezoresistive module that includes a conductive fabric unit and an interdigital electrode. (<b>D</b>) Mechanism illustration of the pressure-sensitive response of the fabric-based system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SEM images of the fabric (<b>A</b>) without and (<b>B</b>) with CNT/CB coating. Scale bar: 50 μm. (<b>C</b>) Current signal variations under different applied pressure loads. (<b>D</b>) The sensitivity of the fabric-based sensor within the range from 0 to 30 kPa. (<b>E</b>) Response and recovery time of the sensor. (<b>F</b>) Current signal variations under pressure with different frequency. (<b>G</b>) The signal responses of the sensor after bending and twisting processing. (<b>H</b>) Long-term recorded signal response of the sensor over 10,000 cycles.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>A</b>) Illustration of a person who can be equipped with the fabric-based sensor on different body position for health monitoring. (<b>B</b>) The continuously recorded pulse signal. (<b>C</b>) Enlarged pulse signal with distinct percussion wave, tidal wave, and diastolic wave characteristics. (<b>D</b>) Signal responses for finger bending. (<b>E</b>) Real-time current signals respond to different speech actions. (<b>F</b>) Signal responses under different exercise conditions. (<b>G</b>) Illustration of the work positions on the foot of the fabric-based sensor. (<b>H</b>) Real-time recorded signal responses from walking with sensors placed on different parts of the foot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>A</b>) Illustration of the sensor array placed on the foot for health monitoring. (<b>B</b>) The current variation in different sensor modules under 0.1 and 2.0 kPa loads. (<b>C</b>) The correlation between actual step numbers and step numbers predicted by the sensor and commercial accelerometer. Relative signal responses of the sensor array for (<b>D</b>) HC and (<b>E</b>) SP. (<b>F</b>) Images of the 6 m walking-speed test in the hospital. (<b>G</b>) Six-meter walking speeds of SP and HC. (<b>H</b>) Correlation illustration of various body characteristics. * <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.05 and ** <span class="html-italic">p</span> &lt; 0.01.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 13196 KiB  
Review
Enhancing Intelligent Shoes with Gait Analysis: A Review on the Spatiotemporal Estimation Techniques
by Anna M. Joseph, Azadeh Kian and Rezaul Begg
Sensors 2024, 24(24), 7880; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24247880 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 584
Abstract
The continuous, automated monitoring of sensor-based data for walking capacity and mobility has expanded gait analysis applications beyond controlled laboratory settings to real-world, everyday environments facilitated by the development of portable, cost-efficient wearable sensors. In particular, the integration of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) [...] Read more.
The continuous, automated monitoring of sensor-based data for walking capacity and mobility has expanded gait analysis applications beyond controlled laboratory settings to real-world, everyday environments facilitated by the development of portable, cost-efficient wearable sensors. In particular, the integration of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) into smart shoes has proven effective for capturing detailed foot movements and spatiotemporal gait characteristics. While IMUs enable accurate foot trajectory estimation through the double integration of acceleration data, challenges such as drift errors necessitate robust correction techniques to ensure reliable performance. This review analyzes current literature on shoe-based systems utilizing IMUs to estimate spatiotemporal gait parameters and foot trajectory characteristics, including foot–ground clearance. We explore the challenges and advancements in achieving accurate 3D foot trajectory estimation using IMUs in smart shoes and the application of advanced techniques like zero-velocity updates and error correction methods. These developments present significant opportunities for achieving reliable and efficient real-time gait assessment in everyday environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of different gait events during a gait cycle. Reprinted from [<a href="#B32-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Taxonomy of IMUs for gait analysis [<a href="#B48-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">48</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Illustration of the medical and technological requirements for Internet of Health for gait monitoring. Adapted from [<a href="#B81-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">81</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Taxonomy of smart shoe for gait analysis illustrating existing research categories [<a href="#B1-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">1</a>,<a href="#B10-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B15-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B22-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B25-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B55-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>,<a href="#B73-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B83-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">83</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Illustration of steps for estimating foot trajectory and spatiotemporal parameters based on literature analysis [<a href="#B9-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B10-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B15-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B22-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B25-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B26-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B27-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>,<a href="#B72-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">72</a>,<a href="#B73-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B83-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">83</a>,<a href="#B85-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">85</a>,<a href="#B86-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">86</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Visualization of the gait segmentation based on the peak of acceleration signals. IC: initial contact, MS: mid-stance, TO: toe-off. Reprinted from [<a href="#B70-sensors-24-07880" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 4154 KiB  
Article
Youth Soccer Heading Exposure and Its Effects on Clinical Outcome Measures
by Victoria E. Wahlquist, Thomas A. Buckley, Jaclyn B. Caccese, Joseph J. Glutting, Todd D. Royer and Thomas W. Kaminski
Sports 2024, 12(12), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12120342 - 10 Dec 2024
Viewed by 545
Abstract
Purposeful heading, in which players may use their heads to advance the ball in play, is a unique part of soccer. Clinical outcome measures used to aid in the diagnosis of a concussion have long been a cornerstone of the contemporary measurements associated [...] Read more.
Purposeful heading, in which players may use their heads to advance the ball in play, is a unique part of soccer. Clinical outcome measures used to aid in the diagnosis of a concussion have long been a cornerstone of the contemporary measurements associated with the short- and long-term effects of monitoring repetitive head impacts (RHI) and soccer heading exposure. The effects of RHI in the youth population are still unknown, therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine if heading exposure is predictive of changes in self-reported symptoms, neurocognitive functioning, gait, and balance in female youth soccer players over the course of one soccer season. Small improvements in neurocognitive functioning and gait and slight deficits in balance were observed from pre- to post-season. All changes were not clinically relevant and likely due to a practice effect. The low heading exposure in our cohort of youth soccer players was likely not enough to elicit any changes in clinical measures. In general, our clinical outcomes did not change after a season of soccer play and change scores were not predicted by heading exposure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Game Camera Setup on Soccer Field.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>SWAY Stances (<b>left</b> to <b>right</b>) Both feet, tandem right foot in front, tandem left foot in front, single leg right, and single leg left.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>SWAY Reaction Time White and Orange Screen.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Tandem Gait Heel-to-Toe Pattern.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Change in Trail Making Test B Linear Regression.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Change in Reaction Time Linear Regression.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 1546 KiB  
Article
Concurrent Validity and Relative Reliability of the RunScribe™ System for the Assessment of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters During Walking
by Andrés Ráfales-Perucha, Elisa Bravo-Viñuales, Alejandro Molina-Molina, Antonio Cartón-Llorente, Silvia Cardiel-Sánchez and Luis E. Roche-Seruendo
Sensors 2024, 24(23), 7825; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24237825 - 7 Dec 2024
Viewed by 603
Abstract
The evaluation of gait biomechanics using portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) offers real-time feedback and has become a crucial tool for detecting gait disorders. However, many of these devices have not yet been fully validated. The aim of this study was to assess [...] Read more.
The evaluation of gait biomechanics using portable inertial measurement units (IMUs) offers real-time feedback and has become a crucial tool for detecting gait disorders. However, many of these devices have not yet been fully validated. The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and relative reliability of the RunScribe™ system for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters during walking. A total of 460 participants (age: 36 ± 13 years; height: 173 ± 9 cm; body mass: 70 ± 13 kg) were asked to walk on a treadmill at 5 km·h−1. Spatiotemporal parameters of step frequency (SF), step length (SL), step time (ST), contact time (CT), swing time (SwT), stride time (StT), stride length (StL) and normalized stride length (StL%) were measured through RunScribe™ and OptoGait™ systems. Bland–Altman analysis indicated small systematic biases and random errors for all variables. Pearson correlation analysis showed strong correlations (0.70–0.94) between systems. The intraclass correlation coefficient supports these results, except for contact time (ICC = 0.64) and swing time (ICC = 0.34). The paired t-test showed small differences in SL, StL and StL% (≤0.25) and large in CT and SwT (1.2 and 2.2, respectively), with no differences for the rest of the variables. This study confirms the accuracy of the RunScribe™ system for assessing spatiotemporal parameters during walking, potentially reducing the barriers to continuous gait monitoring and early detection of gait issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue IMU and Innovative Sensors for Healthcare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the database.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Gait cycle.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Bland–Altman plots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Linear regression model.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1408 KiB  
Article
Smartphone Accelerometer for Gait Assessment: Validity and Reliability in Healthy Adults
by Ji-Eun Baek, Jin-Hwa Jung, Hang-Keun Kim and Hwi-Young Cho
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11321; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311321 - 4 Dec 2024
Viewed by 631
Abstract
Smartphone-based accelerometers offer a cost-effective and portable alternative to traditional gait analysis systems, with high reliability in measuring key parameters such as walking speed, cadence, and distance. This study assessed their validity compared to the GAITRite system, a widely recognized gold-standard tool, using [...] Read more.
Smartphone-based accelerometers offer a cost-effective and portable alternative to traditional gait analysis systems, with high reliability in measuring key parameters such as walking speed, cadence, and distance. This study assessed their validity compared to the GAITRite system, a widely recognized gold-standard tool, using data from 30 healthy adults walking at 3 self-selected speeds: preferred, slow, and fast. The results demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the two systems, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.778 to 0.999. Although the findings emphasize the potential of smartphone accelerometers for clinical and real-world applications, certain limitations were noted, including participant homogeneity and minor discrepancies at extreme walking speeds. To address these limitations, incorporating data from additional sensors, such as gyroscopes and magnetometers, may enhance the accuracy and reliability of spatial parameter estimation. Overall, the findings support the use of smartphone accelerometers as a promising tool for advancing gait monitoring technologies, particularly in the contexts of telerehabilitation and mobility assessments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Acceleration during a single step. A, step initiation; B, mid-stance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Calculation process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Bland-Altman plots.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1534 KiB  
Article
Machine-Learning-Based Validation of Microsoft Azure Kinect in Measuring Gait Profiles
by Claudia Ferraris, Gianluca Amprimo, Serena Cerfoglio, Giulia Masi, Luca Vismara and Veronica Cimolin
Electronics 2024, 13(23), 4739; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234739 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 638
Abstract
Gait is one of the most extensively studied motor tasks using motion capture systems, the gold standard for instrumental gait analysis. Various sensor-based solutions have been recently proposed to evaluate gait parameters, typically providing lower accuracy but greater flexibility. Validation procedures are crucial [...] Read more.
Gait is one of the most extensively studied motor tasks using motion capture systems, the gold standard for instrumental gait analysis. Various sensor-based solutions have been recently proposed to evaluate gait parameters, typically providing lower accuracy but greater flexibility. Validation procedures are crucial to assess the measurement accuracy of these solutions since residual errors may arise from environmental, methodological, or processing factors. This study aims to enhance validation by employing machine learning techniques to investigate the impact of such errors on the overall assessment of gait profiles. Two datasets of gait trials, collected from healthy and post-stroke subjects using a motion capture system and a 3D camera-based system, were considered. The estimated gait profiles include spatiotemporal, asymmetry, and body center of mass parameters to capture various normal and pathologic gait peculiarities. Machine learning models show the equivalence and the high level of agreement and concordance between the measurement systems in assessing gait profiles (accuracy: 98.7%). In addition, they demonstrate data interchangeability and integrability despite residual errors identified by traditional statistical metrics. These findings suggest that validation procedures can extend beyond strict measurement differences to comprehensively assess gait performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence Methods for Biomedical Data Processing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) MOCAP marker configuration (27 markers) placed on the front and back of the body. (<b>b</b>) MAK skeletal model (20 virtual joints) tracked on the frontal side of the body.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Structure of the Unique Gait Profile vector, including spatiotemporal parameters, asymmetry parameters, and BCOM parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Summary of the 3-step enhanced validation protocol through machine learning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Position of the UGP parameters (black dots) related to the misclassification (ID 64) compared to the HC and PS groups.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop