[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 
Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (137)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 11461 KiB  
Article
Identification and Geological Significance of Late Cambrian OIB-Type Volcanic Rocks in the Nailenggeledaban Area, Northern Yili Block
by Da Xu, Ming Cao, Meng Wang, Youxin Chen, Shaowei Zhao, Shengqiang Zhu, Tai Wen and Zhi’an Bao
Minerals 2025, 15(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15010007 - 25 Dec 2024
Viewed by 188
Abstract
Paleozoic igneous rocks exposed in the northern Yili Block are thought to have resulted from the subduction of the North Tianshan oceanic crust. However, the exact timing of the transition of the northern margin of the Yili Block from a passive to an [...] Read more.
Paleozoic igneous rocks exposed in the northern Yili Block are thought to have resulted from the subduction of the North Tianshan oceanic crust. However, the exact timing of the transition of the northern margin of the Yili Block from a passive to an active continental margin remains unknown. In this paper, the petrological and geochemical features, zircon U-Pb chronology, Lu-Hf isotopes, and Sr-Nd isotopes of volcanic rocks in the Nailenggeledaban area on the northern margin of the Yili Block were studied. Zircon U-Pb dating results show that the crystallization ages of the volcanic rocks in the Nailenggeledaban area on the northern margin of the Yili Block are 491 ± 2 Ma and 500 ± 2 Ma, suggesting they were formed during the Late Cambrian. Geochemical features show that the volcanic rocks are alkaline basalts with rare earth and trace element distribution patterns similar to OIB, although they exhibit some degree of Zr and Hf depletion. The εHf(t) values of alkaline basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area at the northern Yili Block range from −3.48 to −1.00, with a TDM1 age of 1152 to 1263 Ma. The εNd(t) values range from −3.53 to −0.96, with a TDM1 age of 1471 to 2162 Ma. Combined with geochemical data, the alkaline basalt magma in the Nailenggeledaban area on the northern margin of the Yili Block may be derived from the Mesoproterozoic enriched lithospheric mantle. The composition of the mantle source area is potentially garnet lherzolite, and the magma appears to have been either unaffected or only minimally contaminated by crustal materials during the ascending process. On the basis of the research results of the Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution in the northern margin of the Yili Block, this paper proposes that the volcanic rocks in the Nailenggeledaban area, located on the northern margin of the Yili Block, were formed in a back-arc extensional environment resulting from the subduction of the North Tianshan Ocean (or Junggar Ocean) beneath the northern margin of the Yili Block during the Late Cambrian. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geochronology and Geochemistry of Alkaline Rocks)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Structural architecture of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt and (<b>b</b>) concise geological map outlining the Western Tianshan Orogen Belt in China (according to Gao et al., 2009a [<a href="#B21-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">21</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Location map of Late Cambrian basalt samples in the Nailenggeledaban area on the northern YB (modified after Dong et al., 2009 [<a href="#B36-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">36</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) TS21-02, (<b>b</b>) TS2207 field photos, and (<b>c</b>) TS21-02, (<b>d</b>) TS2207 microscope photos of basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area. Pl: plagioclase, Px: pyroxene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) space primitive mantle-normalized trace element (normalization values are from Sun et al., 1989 [<a href="#B48-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">48</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon CL images of basalts (in the figure, the red solid circle represents the laser ablation position of zircon age, and the yellow dotted circle represents the analysis position of zircon Lu-Hf isotope).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon U-Pb age concordia diagrams of basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t)-t-plot for the zircon crystals of basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<span class="html-italic"><sub>i</sub></span>-ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) plot for the basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area (modified after Zimmer et al., 1995 [<a href="#B50-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">50</a>]). DM: depleted mantle, MORB: Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt, OIB: Ocean Island Basalt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Nb/La-(Th/Nb)<sub>N</sub> diagram and (<b>b</b>) La/Ba-La/Nb diagram of basalt in the Nailenggeledaban area (base map according to Fitton et al., 1991, 1995 [<a href="#B57-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">57</a>,<a href="#B58-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">58</a>]). OIB: Ocean Island Basalt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Harker variation diagram of the basalts in Nailenggeledaban area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Sm/Yb-Sm diagram of basalt in the Nailenggeledaban area (the trends of the partial melting models are derived from Aldanmaz et al., 2000 [<a href="#B61-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">61</a>]). DM: depleted mantle, PM: enriched mantle, N-MORB: Normal Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt, E-MORB: Enriched Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>) Zr/Nb-La/Y diagram and (<b>b</b>) La/Ba-La/Nb diagram of basalts in the Nailenggeledaban area (modified after Xia et al., 2019 [<a href="#B62-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">62</a>]). OIB: Ocean Island Basalt, MORB: Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt, N-MORB: Normal Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalt.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) Zr/Y-Zr/Nb diagram and (<b>b</b>) Zr/Y-Y/Nb-Zr/Nb diagram of basalts in the Naile-nggeledaban area (modified after Fodor et al., 1984 [<a href="#B63-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">63</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Construction environment discrimination diagram in basalts. (<b>a</b>) [<a href="#B75-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">75</a>]: WPB: within-plate basalt; MORB: mid-ocean ridge basalt; VAB: volcanic arc basalt. (<b>b</b>) [<a href="#B76-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">76</a>]: I: N-MORB area at the edge of plate divergence; II: basalt area at the edge of the convergent plate (II1: ocean island arc basalt; II2: continental margin island arc and continental margin volcanic arc basalt area); III: ocean island, seamount basalt area, and TMORB, E-MORB area; IV: continental intraplate basalt area (IV1: intracontinental rift valley and continental rift valley basalt area; IV2: intracontinental rift alkaline basalt area; IV3: continental extension zone (or initial rift) basalt area); V: mantle plume basalt area. (<b>c</b>) [<a href="#B77-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">77</a>] (Cabanis and Lecolle, 1989). (<b>d</b>) [<a href="#B78-minerals-15-00007" class="html-bibr">78</a>]: AI, AII: in-plate alkaline basalt; AII, C: intraplate tholeiitic basalt, B: enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt, D: depleted mid-ocean ridge basalt; C, D: volcanic arc basalt.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 20991 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of Diorite-Porphyrite in the Southern Xintai Area of the Mid-Western Shandong Peninsula, North China Craton: Insights from Geochronology, Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopes
by Lijie Jin, Jilin Wang, Pinrui Qin, Chunjia Li, Shuang Xu, Zhixin Han, Wei Wang, Wei Liu, Zisheng Wang, Jilei Gao and Fangfang Li
Minerals 2024, 14(12), 1220; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14121220 - 29 Nov 2024
Viewed by 461
Abstract
The Early Cretaceous intermediate intrusive rocks have important significance in understanding the crust–mantle interaction, iron mineralization, and tectonic evolution in the western Shandong Peninsula. In this study, we present new zircon U–Pb ages, and Hf isotope, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotopes, and the mineral [...] Read more.
The Early Cretaceous intermediate intrusive rocks have important significance in understanding the crust–mantle interaction, iron mineralization, and tectonic evolution in the western Shandong Peninsula. In this study, we present new zircon U–Pb ages, and Hf isotope, whole-rock geochemistry, Sr–Nd isotopes, and the mineral chemistry of the diorite-porphyrite in the southern Xintai area, mid-western Shandong Peninsula. The diorite-porphyrite formed at ca. 125 Ma. They have intermediate SiO2 (59.57–62.29 wt.%) and MgO (2.78–3.58 wt.%) contents, high Mg# values (53–56), high Sr (589–939 ppm) and low Y (9.2–10.8 ppm) contents, and high Sr/Y ratios (54–94), showing adakitic affinity. The diorite-porphyrite exhibits lower zircon εHf(t) values (−30.1 to 7.5) and whole-rock εNd(t) values (−3.5 to −6.0), with (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios of 0.70514–0.70567. We suggest that the diorite-porphyrite was derived from the partial melting of the local delamination of lower continental crust and then by the interaction with the enriched lithospheric mantle. The genesis of diorite-porphyrite may be related to the rollback process of the Paleo-Pacific slab in the Early Cretaceous. This geodynamic process induced the melting of the enriched lithospheric mantle, subducted oceanic crust, and local delamination of lower continental crust, which produced different types of adakitic magmatism in the western Shandong Peninsula. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic subdivision of the NCC (after [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">43</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Simplified geological map of Shandong Peninsula (after [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Geological sketch map of the southern Xintai area of the mid-western Shandong Peninsula.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Representative photographs and photomicrographs of diorite-porphyrite in the Xintai area. (<b>a</b>) The diorite-porphyrite intruded into the Lower Cambrian Mantou Formation; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>) Field photographs of diorite-porphyrite; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) SEM images of porphyritic texture in diorite-porphyrite; (<b>f</b>) Representative plagioclase phenocryst in cross-polarized light.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Typical zircon CL images and zircon U–Pb concordia diagrams of diorite-porphyrite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) (K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O) versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS; [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">56</a>]); (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus K<sub>2</sub>O [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">57</a>]; A/CNK versus A/NK [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">58</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Data sources: Adakitic rocks from Tiezhai [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">22</a>]; Mengyin and Liujing [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; Mafic intrusive rocks [<a href="#B11-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">11</a>]; Laiwu ore-related intrusive rocks [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation in (<b>a</b>) MgO, (<b>b</b>) Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>T</sup>, (<b>c</b>) CaO, (<b>d</b>) Na<sub>2</sub>O, (<b>e</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>f</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, (<b>g</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O, and (<b>h</b>) P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> versus SiO<sub>2</sub> for the samples. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized element spidergrams. The values used for normalization are adopted from [<a href="#B59-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">59</a>]. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagram of (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> versus ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagram of zircon <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U ages versus ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t) values of adakitic rocks, mafic intrusions/dykes and alkaline complex.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) hornblende classification [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>b</b>) hornblende equilibrium temperature versus equilibrium pressure; (<b>c</b>) plagioclase Or-Ab-An [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; (<b>d</b>,<b>e</b>) variation in An and FeO values of plagioclase phenocrysts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Ni versus MgO; (<b>b</b>) CaO/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> versus MgO [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>]. Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y versus Y and (<b>b</b>) (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> versus Yb<sub>N</sub> (after [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">68</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Mg# versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">80</a>]), (<b>b</b>) Ni versus SiO<sub>2</sub>, and (<b>c</b>) Cr versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B81-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">81</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Ba versus Nb/Y, (<b>b</b>) Th/Yb versus Ba/La, (<b>c</b>) Ba/Y versus Nb/Y, (<b>d</b>) Th/Yb versus Sr/Nd (after [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">76</a>]). Data sources are the same as <a href="#minerals-14-01220-f004" class="html-fig">Figure 4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Schematic diagram of the evolution in the Early Cretaceous. Modified form [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-01220" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 10810 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis of the Shibaogou Mo-W-Associated Porphyritic Granite, West Henan, China: Constrains from Geochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Chronology, and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes
by Zhiwei Qiu, Zhenju Zhou, Nan Qi, Pocheng Huang, Junming Yao, Yantao Feng and Yanjing Chen
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1173; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111173 - 19 Nov 2024
Viewed by 516
Abstract
The Shibaogou pluton, located in the Luanchuan orefield of western Henan Province in China, is a typical porphyritic granite within the Yanshanian “Dabie-type” Mo metallogenic system. It is mainly composed of porphyritic monzogranite and porphyritic syenogranite. Zircon U-Pb dating results indicate emplacement ages [...] Read more.
The Shibaogou pluton, located in the Luanchuan orefield of western Henan Province in China, is a typical porphyritic granite within the Yanshanian “Dabie-type” Mo metallogenic system. It is mainly composed of porphyritic monzogranite and porphyritic syenogranite. Zircon U-Pb dating results indicate emplacement ages of 150.1 ± 1.3 Ma and 151.0 ± 1.1 Ma for the monzogranite and 148.1 ± 1.0 Ma and 148.5 ± 1.3 Ma for the syenogranite. The pluton is characterized by geochemical features of high silicon, metaluminous, and high-K calc-alkaline compositions, enriched in Rb, U, Th, and Pb, and exhibits high Sr/Y (18.53–58.82), high (La/Yb)N (9.01–35.51), and weak Eu anomalies. These features indicate a source region from a thickened lower crust with garnet and rutile as residual phases at depths of approximately 40–60 km. Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic analyses suggest that the magmatic source is mainly derived from the Taihua and Xiong’er Groups of the Huaxiong Block, mixed with juvenile crustal rocks from the Kuanping and Erlangping Groups of the North Qinling Accretion Belt. Combined with geological and isotopic characteristics, it is concluded that the Shibaogou pluton formed during the compression–extension transition period associated with the collision between the Yangtze Block and the North China Craton, reflecting the complex partial melting processes in the thickened lower crust. The present study reveals that the magmatic–hydrothermal activity at Shibaogou lasted approximately 5 Ma, showing multi-phase characteristics, further demonstrating the close relationship between the pluton and the Mo-W mineralization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic subdivision map of China, showing the location of the Qinling Orogen (modified after [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">24</a>]); (<b>b</b>) tectonic subdivision map of the Qinling Orogen, showing the location of the Luanchuan orefield (modified after [<a href="#B24-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">24</a>]); (<b>c</b>) geological map of Luanchuan orefield, showing the granitoid and deposits distribution (modified after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">25</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of Shibaogou deposit (modified after [<a href="#B34-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">34</a>]). The number of drill holes: 1. ZK6002; 2. ZK6204; 3. ZK6402; 4. ZK6602.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Geological profiles for prospecting lines L64 (<b>a</b>) and L03 (<b>b</b>) of the Shibaogou deposit [<a href="#B34-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">34</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Photographs showing petrography of the Shibaogou granite. (<b>a</b>) Hand specimen of monzogranite; (<b>b</b>) monzogranite under plane-polarized light (PPL), with euhedral-tabular plagioclase phenocrysts and anhedral microcline and quartz; (<b>c</b>) monzogranite under crossed-nicols light (CN); (<b>d</b>) sericitized monzogranite (PPL), with chloritized biotite and sericitized–kaolinized orthoclase; (<b>e</b>) hand specimen of K-feldspar-altered monzogranite; (<b>f</b>) K-feldspar alteration in monzogranite (PPL), with plagioclase phenocrysts altered to orthoclase, while orthoclase phenocrysts remain unaltered; (<b>g</b>) hand specimen of syenogranite; (<b>h</b>) microphotograph of syenogranite (PPL), with anhedral quartz and orthoclase phenocrysts as the main components; (<b>i</b>) microphotograph of syenogranite (CN). Mineral abbreviations: Bi. biotite; Mc. microcline; Or. orthoclase; Pl. plagioclase; Qz. quartz; Ttn. titanite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons from the Shibaogou granite. The red circles indicate the locations of U-Pb dating analyses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Zircon U-Pb Concordia diagram of samples from the Shibaogou granite. Monzogranite samples: (<b>a</b>) 6602-11, (<b>b</b>) 6204-60. Syenogranite samples: (<b>c</b>) 6402-36, (<b>d</b>) 6002-1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Major elements variation diagrams for the Shibaogou granite: (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O plots (base map after [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">47</a>]); (<b>b</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK discriminant diagram (base map after [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">47</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns ((<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>), normalized values are from [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">49</a>]) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element patterns ((<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>), normalized values are from [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">50</a>]) for the Shibaogou granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Whole-rock lead isotopic composition diagram of Shibaogou granite. (<b>a</b>) <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb diagram; (<b>b</b>) <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb diagram. The Pb isotope of strata has been recalculated to 150 Ma, and the initial data are from Taihua and Xiong’er Group [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">56</a>,<a href="#B57-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">57</a>,<a href="#B58-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">58</a>], Luanchuan and Guandaokou Group [<a href="#B59-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">59</a>], and Kuanping and Erlangping Group [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">60</a>]. The trends for U (upper crust), O (orogenic belt), M (mantle), and L (lower crust) are from [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Discriminant diagrams for tectonic environment of Shibaogou granite. (<b>a</b>) Granite (Y + Nb)-Rb tectonic diagram (base map from [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">63</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Granite Hf-Rb/30-Ta × 3 tectonic diagram (base map from [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">64</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) La/Sm vs. La plot shows a batch partial melting trend [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">70</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Ba vs. Sr plot shows the trend of mineral fractionation phase (arrow direction are after Rollinson [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">71</a>]), ruling out the influence from the fractionation of plagioclase and hornblende. Bi = biotite, Hb = hornblende, Kf = K-feldspar, Ms = muscovite, Pl = plagioclase.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The <span class="html-italic">I</span><sub>Sr</sub>-<span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) diagram of Shibaogou granite (t = 150 Ma). The Sr-Nd isotope of strata has been recalculated to 150 Ma, and the initial data are from the Taihua Supergroup [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">57</a>,<a href="#B86-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">86</a>,<a href="#B87-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">87</a>], Xiong’er Group [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B88-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">88</a>,<a href="#B89-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">89</a>], Qinling Group [<a href="#B90-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">90</a>], Kuanping Group and Erlangping Group [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">60</a>], Yudongzi Group, and Kongling Group [<a href="#B84-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">84</a>,<a href="#B91-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">91</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Zircon Hf isotopic diagram of Shibaogou granite (t = 150 Ma). Data on Shibaogou granite are from <a href="#app1-minerals-14-01173" class="html-app">Table S6</a>. Data of strata are from the Guandaokou Group [<a href="#B92-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">92</a>], Kuanping and Erlangping Group (the crustal material of North Qinling) [<a href="#B92-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">93</a>], Qinling Group [<a href="#B93-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">93</a>], Xiong’er Group [<a href="#B89-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">89</a>,<a href="#B94-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">94</a>], and Taihua Supergroup [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">26</a>,<a href="#B95-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">95</a>,<a href="#B96-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">96</a>,<a href="#B97-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">97</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Yanshanian tectonic model of Qinling orogen and genesis model of the Shibaogou pluton (modified after [<a href="#B9-minerals-14-01173" class="html-bibr">9</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 11964 KiB  
Article
Formation and Tectonic Evolution of Ophiolites in the Sabah Area (Borneo, SE Asia)
by Zhiwen Tian, Youfeng Gao, Pujun Wang and Huafeng Tang
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1078; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111078 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1273
Abstract
Zircon U-Pb dating, rock geochemistry, Sr-Nd-Pb, and zircon Hf isotope analyses were conducted on the ultrabasic and basic rocks of ophiolites in the Sabah area (Borneo, SE Asia). The zircon U-Pb ages of ultrabasic and basic rocks range from 248 to 244 Ma, [...] Read more.
Zircon U-Pb dating, rock geochemistry, Sr-Nd-Pb, and zircon Hf isotope analyses were conducted on the ultrabasic and basic rocks of ophiolites in the Sabah area (Borneo, SE Asia). The zircon U-Pb ages of ultrabasic and basic rocks range from 248 to 244 Ma, indicating that the ophiolites already existed in the early Triassic. The rare earth elements of basic rocks in Central Sabah show N-MORB-type characteristics and E-MORB-type characteristics in the northwest and southeast. The εNd(t) values of basic rocks range from 3.66 to 8.73, and the εHf(t) values of zircon in ultrabasic rocks are between −10.2 and −6.1. Trace element analysis shows that the magmatic source was influenced by melts and fluids from the subducting plate of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean. The tectonic evolution of the Sabah area can be traced back to the Early Triassic. At that time, the fast subduction of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean plate and the retreating of the Paleo-Pacific plate resulted in the upwelling of mantle material in relatively small extensional settings, leading to the formation of the ophiolites. From the Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous, the Paleo-Pacific plate was intensely subducted, and the ophiolite intrusion in the Sabah area moved to the continental crust of South China or the Sundaland margin as fore-arc ophiolites. From the Late Cretaceous to the Miocene, with the expansion of the Proto-South China Sea and South China Sea oceanic crust, the ophiolites in the Sabah area drifted southward with microplate fragments and sutured with East Borneo. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Tectonic sketch map of Southeast Asia [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">8</a>,<a href="#B13-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B32-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. Yellow square is represented Figure 2a. D, Devonian; P, Permian; P<sub>2</sub>, Late Permian; T, Triassic; J, Jurassic; K, Cretaceous; K<sub>1</sub>, Early Cretaceous; K<sub>2</sub>, Late Cretaceous; E, Paleogene; E<sub>1</sub>, Paleocene; E<sub>2</sub>, Eocene; E<sub>3</sub>, Oligocene; N, Neogene.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Geological map of the Sabah area and the sample locations ((<b>a</b>), location shown in <a href="#minerals-14-01078-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>), and related cross section (<b>b</b>), location shown in <a href="#minerals-14-01078-f001" class="html-fig">Figure 1</a>, reference from Hall (2013) [<a href="#B56-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">56</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Meso- and microphotographs of the Sabah area. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Sp, Bouma sequence, sandstones, shale, and mudstones; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) radiolarites of Cs; (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) pillow lava and basalts of Cs; (<b>g</b>,<b>h</b>) KET, gabbro, and basalt; (<b>i</b>,<b>j</b>) KET, serpentine peridotite; and (<b>k</b>,<b>l</b>) Cb, cataclastic granite. Aug, Augite; Ol, olivine; Pl, Plagioclase; Q, Quartz; Ser, serpentine.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>CL images of zircons from the Sabah area samples.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>LA-ICP-MS U-Pb concordia diagram, weighted mean age diagram, histogram, and probability density distribution diagram. (<b>a</b>) Serpentinite peridotite, KET; (<b>b</b>) gabbro, KET; (<b>c</b>–<b>d</b>) basalt, KET; and (<b>e</b>–<b>f</b>) sandstone from Sp.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Chondrite-normalized rare earth element abundances (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>,<b>e</b>) and primitive mantle-normalized trace element abundances (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>,<b>f</b>) for the igneous rocks of KET and Cs in the Sabah area. The normalizing values are from Sun and McDonough (1989) [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">66</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Discrimination diagrams for the tectonic setting of the host rocks of zircon (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), after Schulz et al. (2006) [<a href="#B91-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">91</a>]), zircon Hf versus U/Yb and Y versus U/Yb diagrams (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>), after Grimes et al. (2007, 2015) [<a href="#B92-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">92</a>,<a href="#B93-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">93</a>]). Sabah ophiolites and non-ophiolite basement data from Wang et al. (2023) [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. KDS-Cs-a and BLR-Cs-a data from Tian et al. (2021) [<a href="#B94-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">94</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Plots of Zr/Nb versus La/Yb ((<b>a</b>), after Göncüoglu et al. (2010) [<a href="#B103-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">103</a>]), La/Sm versus Sm/Yb ((<b>b</b>), after Pearce et al. (2008) [<a href="#B104-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">104</a>]), Nb/Yb versus Th/Yb (<b>c</b>), after Pearce et al. (2008) [<a href="#B104-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">104</a>]), Nb/Yb versus TiO<sub>2</sub>/Yb (<b>d</b>), after Pearce et al. (2008) [<a href="#B104-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">104</a>]), Ti/1000 versus V (<b>e</b>), after Shervais (1982) [<a href="#B105-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">105</a>]), and 2Nb versus Zr/4 versus Y (<b>f</b>), after Meschede (1986) [<a href="#B106-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">106</a>]) for the mafic rocks from the Sabah ophiolites. Sabah ophiolite data from Wang et al. (2023) [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. Palawan ophiolite data from Gibaga et al. (2020) and Dycoco et al. (2021) [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">47</a>]. Kuching mafic rock data from Wang et al. (2021) [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. Meratus complex data from Wang et al. (2022) [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">16</a>]. Philippine ophiolite data from Yumul et al. (2013), Deng et al. (2015), and Guotana et al. (2017) [<a href="#B107-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">107</a>,<a href="#B108-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">108</a>,<a href="#B109-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">109</a>]. South Schwaner Mountains and South China Sea mafic–intermediate rock data from Wang et al. (2022) [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. Hainan Island mafic rock data from Tang et al. (2010), Chen et al. (2014), Zhou et al. (2015), Shen et al. (2018), and Liu et al. (2022) [<a href="#B101-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">101</a>,<a href="#B102-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">102</a>,<a href="#B110-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">110</a>,<a href="#B111-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">111</a>,<a href="#B112-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">112</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Plots of Th/La versus Nb/La ((<b>a</b>), after [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>]), Th/Zr versus Nb/Zr ((<b>b</b>), after [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>]), La/Sm versus Sr/Th ((<b>c</b>), after [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>]), Th/Nb versus Ba/Th (<b>d</b>), after [<a href="#B114-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">114</a>]), Th/Nb versus Ba/La ((<b>e</b>), after [<a href="#B114-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">114</a>]), and Th/Zr versus U/Th ((<b>f</b>), after [<a href="#B115-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">115</a>]) for the basalt from the Sabah ophiolites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr versus ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) (<b>a</b>), <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb versus <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb and <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb (<b>b</b>–<b>c</b>), and Δβ versus Δγ (<b>d</b>). NHRL, with a northern hemisphere reference line. Data are from Zindler and Hart (1986), Burton-Johnson et al. (2020), and Wang et al. (2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023) [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">14</a>,<a href="#B16-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B25-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">25</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B53-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">53</a>,<a href="#B54-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">54</a>,<a href="#B100-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">100</a>,<a href="#B116-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">116</a>,<a href="#B117-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">117</a>,<a href="#B118-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">118</a>,<a href="#B119-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">119</a>,<a href="#B120-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">120</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Hf isotopic composition versus age of the zircons from sample KDS-KET-a: (<b>a</b>) εHf(<span class="html-italic">t</span>)-<span class="html-italic">t</span> diagram and (<b>b</b>) <sup>176</sup>Hf/<sup>177</sup>Hf-<span class="html-italic">t</span> diagram. The chondrite and depleted mantle lines are from Blichert-Toft and Albarède (1997) and Griffin et al. (2000) [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">61</a>,<a href="#B62-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Tectonic settings and processes of continental margin (<b>a</b>), supra-subduction zone (<b>b</b>), and volcanic (<b>c</b>) ophiolite types, with columnar sections depicting the simplified structural architecture of the ophiolite type [<a href="#B121-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">121</a>]. Emplacement pattern of ophiolites (<b>d</b>) [<a href="#B2-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">2</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Tectonic cartoons showing the evolution of the Sabah ophiolite. (<b>a</b>) In the Triassic or older Sabah ophiolite formed. (<b>b</b>) The Jurassic -Early Cretaceous, Sabah ophiolite emplaced on the continental crust basement. (<b>c</b>) The late Late Cretaceous, Sabah and Palawan ophiolites split and drifted southward from the margin of the Dangerous Grounds or Sundaland. (<b>d</b>) The Oligocene, the suturing of the Sabah and Palawan ophiolites with East Borneo. (<b>e</b>) The Miocene, the Sabah orogeny leading to ophiolite exposure. DGS, Dangerous Grounds; EB, East Borneo; PSCS, Proto-South China Sea; SCB, South China Block; SCS, South China Sea; SD, Sundaland.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Detrital zircon discrimination diagram (Cawood et al., 2012) [<a href="#B133-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">133</a>]. A, convergent settings; B, collisional settings; C, extensional settings. CA, crystallization age; DA, deposition age. The KDS-Cs-a and BLR-Cs-a detrital zircon age data from Tian et al. (2021) [<a href="#B94-minerals-14-01078" class="html-bibr">94</a>].</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 10269 KiB  
Article
Neoproterozoic Tectonics of the Arabian-Nubian Shield: Insights from U–Pb Zircon Geochronology, Sr–Nd–Hf Isotopes, and Geochemistry of the Deki Amhare Complex Granitoids, Central Eritrea
by Peng Hu, Guoping Zeng, Zicheng Zhang, Wenshuai Xiang, Junsheng Jiang and Kai Zhao
Minerals 2024, 14(11), 1067; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14111067 - 24 Oct 2024
Viewed by 762
Abstract
The Deki Amhare complex is located in central Eritrea, within the Arabian–Nubian Shield (ANS). It consists of an inner core of monzogranite porphyry and diorite enclaves (MMEs), surrounded outwardly by granodiorite and quartz diorite. The zircon U–Pb ages, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic [...] Read more.
The Deki Amhare complex is located in central Eritrea, within the Arabian–Nubian Shield (ANS). It consists of an inner core of monzogranite porphyry and diorite enclaves (MMEs), surrounded outwardly by granodiorite and quartz diorite. The zircon U–Pb ages, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic compositions of the Deki Amhare complex granitoids were used to discuss the Neoproterozoic tectonics of the ANS. The Late Tonian granodiorite and quartz diorite are metaluminous and calc-alkaline to slightly high-K calc-alkaline I-type plutons, with ages of 811.2 ± 4.8 Ma and 811.6 ± 5.7 Ma, respectively. They exhibit positive εHf(t) (7.6–9.5) and εNd(t) (3.9–4.7) values and relatively low (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (0.70374–0.70463), indicating that they derived from the partial melting of a metasomatized mantle wedge during intra-oceanic subduction. The Ediacaran monzogranite porphyry and MMEs are subalkaline to alkaline A2-type granitoids with ages of 620.0 ± 4.3 Ma and 614.8 ± 3.9 Ma. These display positive εHf(t) (5.3–8.7) and εNd(t) (4.2–4.7) values, as well as low (87Sr/86Sr)i ratios (0.70310–0.70480), implying that they formed through crust–mantle magma mixing related to post-collisional slab break-off. Based on these data, three stages of regional tectonic evolution can be described: (1) from ~1200 Ma to ~875 Ma, the mafic oceanic crust was derived from depleted mantle during the opening of the Mozambique Ocean; (2) from ~875 Ma to ~630 Ma, intra-oceanic subduction and arc formation occurred with the development of I-type batholiths; and (3) from ~630 Ma to ~600 Ma, crustal and lithospheric reworking took place post-collision, leading to the formation of A2-type granitoids. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic framework of the Arabian-Nubian Shield (after Johnson et al., 2011 [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">12</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Simplified terrane map of Eritrea (after Teklay, 2006 [<a href="#B14-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">14</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Simplified geological map showing the main part of the Deki Amhare complex with the sampling locations (from Chen et al., 2013 [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">15</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Hand specimen photograph of sample Ds01, monzogranite porphyry; (<b>b</b>) outcrop of diorite enclave (MME, sample Ds02) in monzogranite porphyry; (<b>c</b>) hand specimen photograph of sample Ds03, granodiorite; (<b>d</b>) hand specimen photograph of sample Ds04, quartz diorite. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) Photomicrographs of the analyzed granitoids from (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>), respectively. Mineral abbreviations: Q = quartz; Pl = plagioclase; Kfs = potash feldspar; Bt = biotite; Hbl = hornblende.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative CL images of zircons from the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea. Red solid circles are for U–Pb dating, while yellow dashed circles are spots for Lu–Hf isotope analysis. (<b>a</b>) Ds01, Monzogranite porphyry; (<b>b</b>) Ds02, MME; (<b>c</b>) Ds03, Granodiorite; (<b>d</b>) Ds04, Quartz diorite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb concordance diagrams for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea: (<b>a</b>) zircon U–Pb concordance diagram for sample Ds01, monzogranite porphyry; (<b>b</b>) zircon U–Pb concordance diagram for sample Ds02, MME; (<b>c</b>) zircon U–Pb concordance diagram for sample Ds03, granodiorite; (<b>d</b>) zircon U–Pb concordance diagram for sample Ds04, quartz diorite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis (ALK) versus SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS; [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">30</a>]), (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">31</a>], and (<b>c</b>) A/NK (molar ratios) versus A/CNK (molar ratios) [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">29</a>] diagrams for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagrams for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea. The chondrite and primitive mantle values are from Sun and McDonough, 1989 [<a href="#B32-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p><span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Hf</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>238</sup>U age diagram illustrating the relationship between the granitoids of the Deki Amhare complex and the juvenile crustal of the ANS [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) versus age and (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>) versus (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> plots for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea. The CHUR and DM values are from Nelson and DePaolo, 1985 [<a href="#B36-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">36</a>]. Fields for the Neoproterozoic magmatism in the ANS are from Gamaleldien et al., 2022 [<a href="#B8-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">8</a>]. Areas for DM, MORB, EM I, and EM II are from Zindler and Hart, 1986 [<a href="#B37-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">37</a>]. The area of continental crust is from Jahn et al., 1999 [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">38</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geochemical classification diagrams for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">43</a>]. (<b>a</b>) FeO*/MgO versus Zr + Nb + Ce + Y; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O versus 10,000 × Ga/Al; (<b>c</b>) Nb-Y-Ce ternary diagram; (<b>d</b>) Yb/Ta versus Y/Nb [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">41</a>]. FG = fractionated granitoids; OGT = unfractionated M-, S-, and I-type granitoids; VAG = volcanic arc granitoids; A<sub>1</sub> = granitoids from rift, plume, and hotspot environments; A<sub>2</sub> = granitoids from post-collisional, post-orogenic, and anorogenic environments [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">43</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Diagrams of selected elements versus SiO<sub>2</sub> for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea. (<b>a</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, (<b>b</b>) MgO, (<b>c</b>) FeO*, (<b>d</b>) CaO, (<b>e</b>) TiO<sub>2</sub>, (<b>f</b>) Zr.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Tectonic discrimination diagrams for the Deki Amhare complex granitoids in central Eritrea [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-01067" class="html-bibr">65</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Rb versus Y + Nb; (<b>b</b>) Rb versus Yb + Ta. Syn-COLG = syn-collisional granitoids; post-COLG = post-collisional granitoids; VAG = volcanic arc granitoids; ORG = oceanic ridge granitoids; WPG = within plate granitoids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Simplified model for the Neoproterozoic tectonic evolution related to the ANS in central Eritrea: (<b>a</b>) ~1200 Ma to ~875 Ma, rifting of Rodinia Surpercontinent and spreading of Mozambique Ocean; (<b>b</b>) ~875 Ma to ~630 Ma, intra-oceanic subduction and arc formation; (<b>c</b>) ~630 Ma to ~600 Ma, post-collisional reworking of crust and lithosphere.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 6020 KiB  
Article
Magmatic Evolution and Nb-Ta Enrichment of Early Jurassic Granitic Porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta Deposit of the Nanling Range
by Hongling Liu, Jinrong Wang, Qin Chen, Yanna Huang, Xin Li, Wei Liu, Bin Chen and Fan Xiao
Minerals 2024, 14(10), 1005; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14101005 - 3 Oct 2024
Viewed by 688
Abstract
The Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit is located in the Yongding region of Fujian Province, the south-eastern section of the Nanling Range, South China. A series of Nb-Ta deposits, associated with granitic porphyries, are present in the Yongding region. Nevertheless, the genesis of the Nb-Ta [...] Read more.
The Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit is located in the Yongding region of Fujian Province, the south-eastern section of the Nanling Range, South China. A series of Nb-Ta deposits, associated with granitic porphyries, are present in the Yongding region. Nevertheless, the genesis of the Nb-Ta mineralisation remains practically ambiguous, and further study of the latest Nb-Ta granitic porphyries in the Nanling Range may prove beneficial in understanding the mineralisation mechanism. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the petrographic, geochemical, chronological and isotopic characteristics of the Shangxiahu granite porphyry. Shangxiahu granite porphyry is high-potassium subalkaline granite. The Rittman index (δ) is < 3.3, indicating a calc-alkaline signature. The aluminium saturation index (A/CNK) is >1.1, indicating a strong peraluminous nature. Furthermore, the rare earth elements diagram exhibits Eu-negative anomalies and an M-type ‘tetrad effect’, while the multi-element distribution patterns diagram shows an overall right-leaning trend. The SIMS zircon U-Pb age of the Shangxiahu granite porphyry is 183.2 ± 3.2 Ma, revealing the emplacement of the granite porphyry in the Early Jurassic. The high Zr + Nb + Ce + Y content and Ga/Al ratios, along with the zircon saturation temperature TZr value of 1033 °C, indicate that the Shangxiahu granite porphyry exhibits the characteristics of a highly differentiated A-type granite. The Sr-Nd isotope signatures indicate that the Nb-Ta-bearing magma was formed by the mixing of crust–mantle material. The evolution and mineralisation process of granite porphyry in the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit can be divided into four principal stages: (1) the upwelling of Asthenosphere material due to the extensional background induced partial melting of the crust; (2) the mixing of mantle-derived magma and crustal-derived magma; (3) magmatic fractional crystallisation and (4) magma–hydrothermal interaction. Combined with the reported data of Yongding Daping niobium-tantalum mining area, it can be postulated that the enrichment of Nb-Ta ores in Shangxiahu is primarily the result of the upwelling of Asthenosphere material, which caused the partial melting of the niobium-rich Mesoproterozoic crust with high Nb/Ta value. The enrichment of Nb-Ta ore bodies in Daping is primarily attributed to the fractional crystallisation of the magma and the hydrothermal alteration, which is postulated to be associated with the presence of a crust exhibiting elevated Nb/Ta ratios in Yongding. Additionally, it is postulated that ore may be found in area with high crustal source components in the crust–mantle mixed zone. There may be high volatile-rich Nb-Ta orebodies and Sn-rich and W-rich orebodies at depth or in the surrounding area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Deposits)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The tectonic location of the study area (<b>a</b>); simplified regional geological map of the Shangxiahu in Yongding region, Fujian Province, Southern China (<b>b</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs of hand specimens (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and microscopic features (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. The mineral abbreviations are as follows: Kfs (potassium feldspar), Qtz (quartz), Ms (muscovite) and Zrn (zircon).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O-SiO<sub>2</sub> (<b>a</b>) (after Peccerillo and Taylor, 1976 [<a href="#B29-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">29</a>]) and A/NK-A/CNK (<b>b</b>) (after Maniar and Piccoli, 1989 [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">30</a>]) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. The data of granite porphyry in the Daping Nb-Ta deposit are obtained from Wang et al., 2020 [<a href="#B13-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">13</a>] and are the same below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Normalised rare earth elements (<b>a</b>) and multi-element distribution patterns (<b>b</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit (normalisation values after Sun and McDonough, 1989 [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">31</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Zircon CL images (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) and U-Pb concordia diagrams (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO-Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (<b>a</b>) and Zr-10,000 × Ga/Al (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-Age (Ma) diagram of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit and Early Jurassic A-type granite in South China. The Early Jurassic A-type granite data in South China were obtained from Zhou et al., 2018 [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">71</a>], including the Yuanshishan data from Jia et al., 2014 [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">72</a>]; the Beitou data from He et al., 2010 [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">73</a>] and the Wengong data from Zhu et al., 2010 [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">74</a>]; the same are below.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> (<b>a</b>) and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-estimated proportions of the mantle component (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit and Early Jurassic A-type granite in South China. Mantle component (%) = (Nd<sub>c</sub>/Nd<sub>m</sub>)/((Nd<sub>c</sub>/Nd<sub>m</sub>) + (ε<sub>m</sub>−ε<sub>s</sub>)/(ε<sub>s</sub>−ε<sub>c</sub>)) [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">75</a>] in (<b>b</b>). The results of the data are detailed in <a href="#minerals-14-01005-t003" class="html-table">Table 3</a>, where Nd<sub>c</sub> and Nd<sub>m</sub> denote the Nd concentration in the crustal and mantle compositions, respectively. ε<sub>m</sub>, ε<sub>s</sub> and ε<sub>c</sub> denote Nd isotopic compositions for the juvenile crust, the test sample and the crust, respectively. Parameters used as follows: ε<sub>m</sub> = +8, ε<sub>c</sub> = −15, Nd<sub>c</sub> = 25 ppm and Nd<sub>m</sub> = 15 ppm. Nd isotope data for the end members are from Wu et al., 2003 [<a href="#B76-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">76</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Y-Nb-Ce (<b>a</b>) and Y-Nb-3 × Ga (<b>b</b>) triangular diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit (modified from Eby (1992) [<a href="#B77-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">77</a>]). Where A1 represents non-orogenic A-type granite, A2 represents orogenic A-type granite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Rb-Y + Nb (<b>a</b>) and Nb-Y (<b>b</b>) diagrams of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Zr/Nb-Zr diagram (<b>a</b>); Nb-La/Yb diagram (<b>b</b>); Sr-Eu diagram (<b>c</b>); Ba-Rb diagram (<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Rb/Sr-K/Rb diagram (<b>a</b>); Nb/Ta-TE<sub>1,3</sub> diagram (<b>b</b>); Nb/Ta-K/Rb diagram (<b>c</b>); Nb/Ta-Zr/Hf diagram (<b>d</b>) of granite porphyry from the Shangxiahu Nb-Ta deposit. Calculation of tetrad effect is TE<sub>1,3</sub> = (t1 × t3)<sup>0.5</sup>, t1 = (Ce/Ce<sup>t</sup> × Pr/Pr<sup>t</sup>)<sup>0.5</sup>, t3 = (Tb/Tb<sup>t</sup> × Dy/Dy<sup>t</sup>)<sup>0.5</sup>, Ce/Ce<sup>t</sup> = Ce<sub>cn</sub>/(La<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup> × Nd<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup>), Pr/Pr<sup>t</sup> = Pr<sub>cn</sub>/(La<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup> × Nd<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup>), Tb/Tb<sup>t</sup> = Tb<sub>cn</sub>/(Gd<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup> × Ho<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup>), Dy/Dy<sup>t</sup> = Dy<sub>cn</sub>/(Gd<sub>cn</sub><sup>1/3</sup> × Ho<sub>cn</sub><sup>2/3</sup>), which is derived from Irber (1999) [<a href="#B99-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">99</a>]. The data ranges of Sn-, W-, Nb- and Ta-rich granites and Sn- and W-rich granites in Nanling Range are from Xiang et al. 2020 [<a href="#B100-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">100</a>]; the data ranges of barren granites, rare metal granites and Sn-W-(U)-related granites are from Ballouard et al. 2016 [<a href="#B98-minerals-14-01005" class="html-bibr">98</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 13187 KiB  
Article
Geochronology and Origin of Quaternary Dacites from the Daliuchong Volcano in the Tengchong Volcanic Field (TVF), SE Tibetan Plateau
by Jie Tong, Haibo Zou, Zipei Guo, Liwen Chang, Lizhu Wang and Yongwei Zhao
Minerals 2024, 14(10), 990; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14100990 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 749
Abstract
Quaternary volcanoes from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau occur at the Tengchong volcanic field (TVF). The Daliuchong volcano is the largest volcano in the TVF, which has the most felsic compositions with explosive eruptions. The eruption history and origin of the Daliuchong volcano are [...] Read more.
Quaternary volcanoes from the southeastern Tibetan Plateau occur at the Tengchong volcanic field (TVF). The Daliuchong volcano is the largest volcano in the TVF, which has the most felsic compositions with explosive eruptions. The eruption history and origin of the Daliuchong volcano are a matter of debate. In the present paper, we report the groundmass K-Ar ages, whole-rock Sr-Nd-Pb-Hf isotopes, zircon U-Pb ages, and Hf-O isotopic compositions for the Daliuchong volcano to constrain its eruption history and petrogenesis. The groundmass K-Ar ages and zircon U-Pb ages indicate mid-Pleistocene (0.6 Ma to 0.3 Ma) eruptions. The presence of zircon phenocrysts with enriched mantle-like O-Hf isotopes (δ18O < 6‰, and εHf about −2) suggests the involvement of mantle-derived basaltic magmas. The whole-rock Pb isotope compositions and Sr-Nd isotope modeling reveal the involvement of magma from the lower crust. The zircon xenocrysts reveal previously unrecognized 20-Ma magmatic activity at the TVF and contamination of late Cretaceous (66–80 Ma) S-type granites during the formation of the Daliuchong dacites. The dacite magma at Daliuchong was formed by mixing of the mantle-derived magma and lower-crust-derived magma and subsequently contaminated by upper crustal materials, including late Cretaceous S-type granitic rocks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Regional geologic map of southeast margin of the Tibetan Plateau; The gray lines are country borders. (<b>b</b>) geologic map of the Tengchong volcanic field; (<b>c</b>) sample locations (red solid dots) for Daliuchong dacites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field photos for the Daliuchong dacites. (<b>a</b>) Nearly vertical lava strata in the volcanic neck close to the Daliuchong volcano peak; (<b>b</b>) Pahoehoe lava west of the Daliuchong peak; (<b>c</b>) lava with steep strata in the volcanic neck near the Daliuchong peak; (<b>d</b>) lava flow southeast of the Daliuchong peak.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Photos of the Daliuchong hand specimens. All 5 specimens are dense and blocky lavas. The pen is 144 mm long.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Selected microphotographs of the Daliuchong dacites. (<b>a</b>) Plagioclase phenocrysts in groundmass (crossed-nicols, CN) in 19DLC01; (<b>b</b>) plagioclase phenocrysts in groundmass in 19DLC02(CN); (<b>c</b>) amphibole in groundmass (plane polarized light, PPL) in 19DLC03; (<b>d</b>) amphibole in groundmass (PPL) in 23DLC04. Pl = plagioclase; Amp = amphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkali vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) plot [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O (wt.%) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt.%) plot [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">51</a>]. Solid red circle: this paper for Daliuchong. Cross: Daliuchong from Zhang et al. (2017) [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">52</a>]. Maanshan (open circle), Dayingshan (open diamond), and Heikongshan (open triangle) from Zou et al. (2017) [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">53</a>] and Zhao and Fan (2010) [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">54</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Harker variation diagrams for the Daliuchong dacites. Data sources: this paper and [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">52</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rare earth element abundances in Daliuchong dacites, normalized to primitive mantle values. (<b>b</b>) Trace element concentrations in Daliuchong dacites, normalized to primitive mantle values. Normalizing values for primitive mantle are from McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">55</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>A</b>) Sr-Nd isotope correlation diagram. Data sources: SE China basalts [<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">57</a>], Thailand basalts [<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">58</a>], and Tengchong lavas [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">3</a>,<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">53</a>]. (<b>B</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub> vs. ε<sub>Hf</sub> diagram. Nd-Hf mantle array (ε<sub>Hf</sub> = 1.33ε<sub>Nd</sub> + 3.19) [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">53</a>,<a href="#B56-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">56</a>]. The seawater, fine-grained sediment, mantle array, and coarse-grained sediment arrays are from Bayon, et al. [<a href="#B59-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">59</a>]. Data for other Tengchong dacites are from Zhou et al. [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">3</a>]. BSE = Bulk Silicate Earth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb isotope correlation diagram; and (<b>b</b>) <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb isotope correlation diagram for Daliuchong dacites. Data sources: this paper, [<a href="#B1-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">1</a>], and [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">3</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Zircon cathodoluminescence (CL) images. The white number is zircon grain number, the blue number is the value of zircon δ<sup>18</sup>O, and the yellow number is the value of zircon ε<sub>Hf</sub>. Red circles are laser beam spots.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Tera–Wasserburg plots [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">61</a>] for zircon phenocrysts illustrating apparent U-Pb ages for zircons from Daliuchong dacites. The blue lines are linear regression lines. The method of Scharer [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">60</a>] is used for correction of initial <sup>238</sup>U-<sup>230</sup>Th disequilibrium on young <sup>238</sup>U-<sup>206</sup>Pb ages.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Concordant U/Pb plot for xenocrystic zircons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) Zircon Hf-O isotope diagrams for 3 Daliuchong dacites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Whole-rock Sr-Nd isotopes for Daliuchong dacites displaying calculated mixing compositions. The end member compositions are mafic magma [Sr] = 423 ppm, <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr = 0.7052, [Nd] = 20.8 ppm, and <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd = 0.5126 (basaltic sample He-3 in Zou et al. [<a href="#B53-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">53</a>]). Lower crust: [Sr] = 300 ppm, <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr = 0.710, [Nd] = 26 ppm, and <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd =0.5115 [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">69</a>]. Upper crustal granite: [Sr] = 30 ppm, <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr = 0.73, [Nd] = 15 ppm, and <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd= 0.51195 [<a href="#B15-minerals-14-00990" class="html-bibr">15</a>]. CHUR = Chondrite Uniform Reservoir. Black dots are Daliuchong dacites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) Whole-rock <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> and (<b>b</b>) <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> plots.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 6773 KiB  
Article
A Geochemical and Isotopic Investigation of Carbonatites from Huangshuian, Central China: Implications for Petrogenesis and Mantle Sources
by Hao Zhao, Antonio Simonetti, Stefanie Simonetti, Xiaopeng Cao and Yushan Du
Minerals 2024, 14(9), 953; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090953 - 21 Sep 2024
Viewed by 914
Abstract
The exact geological processes involved in the formation of subduction zone-related carbonatites remain ambiguous, along with their implications for crustal/carbon recycling in carbonatite melt generation. This study provides new geochemical and stable (C, O) and radiogenic (Sr, Nd, Pb) isotope data for Huangshuian [...] Read more.
The exact geological processes involved in the formation of subduction zone-related carbonatites remain ambiguous, along with their implications for crustal/carbon recycling in carbonatite melt generation. This study provides new geochemical and stable (C, O) and radiogenic (Sr, Nd, Pb) isotope data for Huangshuian carbonatite, located within the Lesser Qinling Orogen, with the aim to decipher its complex petrogenetic history. The carbonatites display elevated CaO, low MgO and alkali contents, and significant enrichments of Pb, Mo, and HREEs compared to typical carbonatites. The δ13CPDB (−4.6 to −4.9‰) and δ18OSMOW (+6.6 to +7.8‰) values plot within the field of primary igneous carbonatites. The carbonatites are characterized by consistent radiogenic isotopic compositions [(87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.70599–0.70603; εNd = −10.4 to −12.8; 206Pb/204Pb =16.24–17.74]. These combined results suggest that the carbonatites represent late-stage differentiation products of a parental, mantle-derived carbonatite melt. Their corresponding Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic compositions support the hypothesis that the Lesser Qinling carbonatites originate from a heterogeneous upper mantle source involving an EMI-like mantle component coupled with minor assimilation of the basement rocks. The parental carbonatite melt was derived by the melting of carbonate-bearing subcontinental lithospheric mantle metasomatized as the result of Early Triassic subduction of the Mianlue Ocean. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Tectonic regions of China [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. NCB—North China Block; SCB—South China Block. (<b>b</b>) Geological sketch map illustrating the locations of carbonatite complexes within the Qinling orogenic belt, including the HSA complex [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. (<b>c</b>) Simplified geological maps of the HSA carbonatite complex [<a href="#B35-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">35</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Photographs illustrating the textures and mineralogy of HSA carbonatite rocks investigated here. (<b>a</b>) Sample 2106 showing the white carbonatite with medium-grained calcite (Cal). (<b>b</b>) Sample 2106 exhibiting the contact margin between carbonatite and wall rock with silicification (Q: quartz) and sulfuration (Py: pyrite). (<b>c</b>) Sample 2108 representing pink carbonatite with sparsely disseminated molybdenite. Micro-XRF images illustrating distribution of Ca (<b>d</b>), Fe (<b>e</b>), and K (<b>f</b>) for sample 2104; Ce (<b>g</b>), Ti (<b>h</b>), and S (<b>i</b>) for sample 2108 showing the presence of calcite (Cal), fine-grained aegirine (Aeg), and K-feldspar (Kf). Photomicrographs for samples 2104 (<b>j</b>), 2105 (<b>k</b>), and 2108 (<b>l</b>) displaying the domination medium-grained calcite with early coarse-grained anhedral quartz and K-feldspar, and late interstitial aegirine and molybdenite (Mol).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spidergrams. (<b>b</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns for samples of HSA carbonatite. Primitive mantle values and chondrite values are from [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">64</a>]. The gray field represents the chondrite-normalized REE data for bulk carbonatites from Lesser Qinling [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">33</a>], whereas the light yellow field represents compositions for average calciocarbonatite [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">4</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustrates carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions for carbonate separated from the HSA carbonatite samples investigated here. The white-colored points represent analyses for samples from HSA reported previously by [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">33</a>]. These are compared to those carbonatites from HLP [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">27</a>,<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">65</a>], South Qinling (MY) [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">46</a>] and Blue River, Canada (BR) [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">66</a>]. Primary igneous carbonatite field and oceanic basalts box as defined by [<a href="#B67-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">67</a>]. Illustrated are the major processes responsible for changes in C–O isotopic composition of carbonatites [<a href="#B68-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">68</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Diagrams of initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. ε<sub>Nd(t)</sub> values for samples of HSA carbonatite. These are compared to initial Sr and Nd isotope data reported for those carbonatites from Lesser Qinling [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">31</a>], and South Qinling (MY) [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. The fields for HIMU and EM I (enriched mantle I) mantle components are from [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">69</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagrams of initial <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb (<b>a</b>) and initial <sup>208</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb (<b>b</b>) vs. <sup>206</sup>Pb/<sup>204</sup>Pb values for samples of HSA carbonatite. These are compared to initial Pb isotope data reported for those carbonatites from Lesser Qinling (HSA and HLP) [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">31</a>] and South Qinling (MY) [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">46</a>]. These Pb isotopic features for EACL carbonatites are from [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">20</a>]. The fields for HIMU, EM I, EM II, and DMM (depleted MORB mantle) mantle components are from [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">69</a>]. The trends for U (upper crust), O (orogenic belt), M (mantle) and L (lower crust) are from [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">70</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Yb/La vs. Yb/Ca diagram for HSA carbonatites [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">71</a>]. These are compared to those carbonatites from Lesser Qinling reported previously by [<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; Miaoya [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">46</a>], Fengzhen [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">47</a>], Bayan Obo [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">72</a>], Shandong [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">73</a>], Mianning-Dechang [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">48</a>], Blue River, Canada [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">66</a>], Jacupirange, Brazil [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">74</a>], and Catalao, Brazil [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">75</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagrams of initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. ε<sub>Nd(t)</sub> values for samples of those carbonatites from China [<a href="#B30-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">30</a>,<a href="#B31-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">31</a>,<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">46</a>,<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">47</a>,<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">72</a>,<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">73</a>,<a href="#B105-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">105</a>]. These are compared to initial Sr and Nd isotope data reported for EACL carbonatites [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">20</a>], Blue River carbonatites from Canada [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">66</a>], and Jacupirange carbonatites from Brazil [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">65</a>]. The fields for Lete Mesozoic granites, Taihua Group, and Xiong’er Group are from [<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">33</a>,<a href="#B106-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">106</a>]. The fields for DM, HIMU, EM I and EMII mantle components are from [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">69</a>]. Binary mixing model curves between the assumed EM I and Xiong’er Group. The ε<sub>Nd(t)</sub> is assumed to be −9 in the EM I and −24 in the Xiong’er Group in the models. The (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> of 0.705 is adopted for EM I in 3 models. The (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> of the Xiong’er Group is taken to be 0.708, 0.709, and 0.710 in models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. A mixture of 10% Xiong’er Group and 90% EM I is represented by 0.1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of Ba (ppm) vs. Nb/Y (<b>a</b>) and U (ppm) vs. Nb/Y (<b>b</b>) for HSA carbonatite and other carbonatites worldwide (references after <a href="#minerals-14-00953-f007" class="html-fig">Figure 7</a> and Ambadongar, India [<a href="#B123-minerals-14-00953" class="html-bibr">123</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 6955 KiB  
Article
Zircon U-Pb Ages of the Granitoids in Shanxi and Its Significance for Tectonic Evolution of North China Craton in Mesozoic
by Fuhui Qi, Pengpeng Li and Chao Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(9), 940; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090940 - 15 Sep 2024
Viewed by 708
Abstract
Mesozoic granitoid formations offer crucial insights into the tectonic history of the North China Craton. New zircon U-Pb ages of two Mesozoic granitoids in the Huai’an terrane yield ages of 226.4 ± 1.1 Ma for the Yihe (YH) granite and 156.3 ± 2.9 [...] Read more.
Mesozoic granitoid formations offer crucial insights into the tectonic history of the North China Craton. New zircon U-Pb ages of two Mesozoic granitoids in the Huai’an terrane yield ages of 226.4 ± 1.1 Ma for the Yihe (YH) granite and 156.3 ± 2.9 Ma for the Zhujiagou (ZJG) granodiorite. The negative Nb, Ta, and Ti anomalies; high Nb/Ta ratios (20.4 to 24.1); high (La/Yb)N (30–84); low initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.707725–0.708188); and negative ƐNd(t) values of the Yihe complex suggest that it originated from the partial melting of the lower crust and lithospheric mantle. However, the geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic results of the ZJG granodiorite are characterized by I-type granites: Na2O + K2O values of 7.27 to 7.94 wt%, negative Nb anomalies, positive Pb anomalies, higher initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.710979–0.714841), and much lower ƐNd(t) values (−27.1 to −30.1). The Late Jurassic Zhujiagou complex was derived from partial melting of a thickened low crust, and during the Late Triassic, magmatic rocks were formed under a post-collisional extensional regime. Multiple upwellings of the asthenosphere facilitated the mixing of magmas derived from partial melting of the lithospheric mantle and lower crust. These mixed magmas then ascended to the upper crust after undergoing fractional crystallization, leading to the formation of the YH complex. In the Late Jurassic, the tectonic regime of the NCC shifted from compression to extension. The Late Jurassic intrusion identified in this study developed within a compressional setting linked to the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific Ocean. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Geochemistry and Geochronology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>): Location map showing the tectonic setting of the North China Craton (modified after [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">20</a>]), (<b>b</b>): Simplified geological map of the tectonic subdivision of the North China Craton and location of Shanxi Province, (<b>c</b>): The outline of Shanxi Province and the distribution of alkaline intrusive rocks, the rectangle shows the position of <a href="#minerals-14-00940-f002" class="html-fig">Figure 2</a> (DTGL: Daxinganling-Taihang gravity lineament, modified after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">25</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Huai’an complex and sample sites of this study. The Yihe granite–diorite complex is represented by sample YH and the Zhujiagou complex by sample ZJG. The age of Mesozoic granitoid rocks are cited by Su et al. [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">26</a>] and Shao et al. [<a href="#B27-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">27</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Field photograph of (<b>a</b>) ZJG granite–diorite complex; (<b>c</b>) ZJG tonalite complex; and Microphotographs (crossed nicols) of (<b>b</b>) YH granite–diorite complex; (<b>d</b>) YH tonalite complex from Huai’an terrain (Q: quartz; Pl: plagioclase; Bi: biotite; Af: alkali-feldspar).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Representative CL images for analyzed zircons of the Mesozoic granitoids from Huai’an terrane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>U-Pb concordia diagram of zircons of the Mesozoic granitoids from Huai’an terrane.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Major element concentrations for the Mesozoic granitoids from Huai’an terrain: (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus total alkali (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) content diagram [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">45</a>]; (<b>b</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O versus SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram (after [<a href="#B46-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">46</a>]); (<b>c</b>) A/CNK versus A/NK diagram (A/CNK = molar ratio of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(CaO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O), A/NK = molar ratio of Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)); (<b>d</b>) Q-A-P (quartz-alkali feldspar-plagioclase feldspar) diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the Mesozoic granitoids from Huai’an terrain. Chondrite values are from [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Primitive mantle-normalized trace element patterns of the Mesozoic granitoids from the Huai’an terrain, with primitive mantle values sourced from [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">47</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Variations in major element oxides for the Mesozoic granitoids from the Huai’an terrain. The shaded area indicates the compositions of partial melts derived from lower crustal rocks in experimental studies [<a href="#B22-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">22</a>,<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">48</a>,<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">49</a>,<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Petrogenetic discrimination diagrams for the Mesozoic granitoids from the Huai’an terrain are presented as Th/Hf versus Th and Ba/Nd versus Ba. Insets depict schematic C<sup>H</sup> versus C<sup>H</sup>/C<sup>M</sup> diagrams (where C<sup>H</sup> denotes highly incompatible element concentrations and C<sup>M</sup> denotes moderately incompatible element concentrations). The curves represent calculated melt compositions resulting from partial melting, magma mixing, and fractional crystallization (revised [<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">54</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Sketch map illustrating the distribution of the late Triaccic and Jurassic magmatic rocks in the NCC (modified after Zhang et al. [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Trace element discrimination diagrams for the ZJG and YH complex [<a href="#B66-minerals-14-00940" class="html-bibr">66</a>]. VAG—volcanic arc granites; ORG—ocean ridge granite; WPG—within-plate granites; syn-COLG—syn-collisional granites.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 17840 KiB  
Article
Geochronology and Geochemistry of Granodiorite Porphyry in the Baoshan Cu-Pb-Zn Deposit, South China: Insights into Petrogenesis and Metallogeny
by Xueling Dai, Ke Chen, Junke Zhang, Yongshun Li, Mingpeng He and Zhongfa Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(9), 897; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14090897 - 30 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 588
Abstract
The Baoshan Cu-Pb-Zn deposit is situated at the intersection of the Qin-Hang Cu polymetallic and Nanling W-Sn polymetallic metallogenic belts. The age, lithology, petrogenesis, and tectonic setting of granodiorite porphyry within the deposit remain subjects of debate. Additionally, there is a lack of [...] Read more.
The Baoshan Cu-Pb-Zn deposit is situated at the intersection of the Qin-Hang Cu polymetallic and Nanling W-Sn polymetallic metallogenic belts. The age, lithology, petrogenesis, and tectonic setting of granodiorite porphyry within the deposit remain subjects of debate. Additionally, there is a lack of comparative studies with the W-Sn-related granites in the region. This study conducted whole-rock major and trace element analysis, Sr-Nd isotope analysis, and zircon U-Pb dating on the Baoshan granodiorite porphyry. The zircon U-Pb age of the granodiorite porphyry is 162 ± 1 Ma. The whole-rock SiO2 and K2O contents range from 65.87 to 68.21 wt.% and 3.42 to 5.62 wt.%, respectively, indicating that the granodiorite porphyry belongs to high-potassium calc-alkaline I-type granite. The granodiorite porphyry is characterized by enrichment in LREE and depletion in HREE (LREE/HREE ratio = 6.2–21.2). The samples of granodiorite porphyry generally exhibit weak negative Eu anomalies or no Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.62–1.04, mean = 0.82). The (87Sr/86Sr)i and εNd(t) values are 0.707717–0.709506 and −7.54 to −4.87, respectively. The whole-rock geochemical composition and Sr-Nd isotopic values indicate that the magma originated from the partial melting of the Mesoproterozoic ancient crust and Neoproterozoic mafic juvenile lower crust, with the addition of high oxygen fugacity and water-rich lithospheric mantle melts. The source of the granodiorite porphyry in the Baoshan deposit is significantly different from the crust-derived metapelite source of the W-Sn-related granite in the area, indicating that different magma sources might be the main reason for the co-spatial and nearly contemporaneous development of Cu-Pb-Zn and W-Sn mineralization in the southern Hunan region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ag-Pb-Zn Deposits: Geology and Geochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Sketch map of the regional tectonic framework. (<b>b</b>) The distributions of the Jurassic granites and deposits in the South China Block (modified from [<a href="#B3-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">3</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sketch map of the regional geology showing the tectonic framework and mineralization resources (modified from [<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">19</a>]). Geochronological data from [<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">40</a>,<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">41</a>,<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">42</a>,<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">43</a>,<a href="#B44-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">44</a>,<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">45</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simplified geologic map of the Baoshan Cu-Pb-Zn deposit (after [<a href="#B47-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">47</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cross section along the No. 169 prospecting line from the Baoshan Cu-Pb-Zn deposit (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">48</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hydrothermal alteration characteristics of the Baoshan deposit. (<b>a</b>) Development of potassic alteration, epidotization, chloritization, and silicification in the ore-forming granodiorite porphyry. (<b>b</b>) Skarnization and silicification are closely associated with Cu mineralization. (<b>c</b>) Skarnization in wall rocks. (<b>d</b>) Silicitization and fluoropylitization are closely related to sphalerite and galena. Ep = epidote; Qtz = quartz; Chl = chlorite; Ccp = Chalcopyrite; Grt = garnet; Cb = Carbonate minerals; Cpx = pyroxene; ls = limestone; Fl = fluorite; Py = pyrite; Sp = sphalerite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Petrographic characteristics of granodiorite porphyry in the Baoshan deposit. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Granodiorite porphyry; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) K-feldspar and biotite in granodiorite porphyry (Crossed polar and transmitted light). Kfs = K-feldspar; Pl = Plagioclase; Bt = Biotite; Qtz = Quartz; Amp = Aamphibole.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Alteration box plots (after [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">49</a>]) showing that all the samples from the Dongguashan and Xinqiao in this study have relatively weak hydrothermal alteration. Previous data based on the literature [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">4</a>,<a href="#B9-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">9</a>,<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">16</a>], the same below. AI = 100 × (K<sub>2</sub>O + MgO)/(K<sub>2</sub>O + MgO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + CaO); CCPI = 100 × (MgO + FeO)/(MgO + FeO + K<sub>2</sub>O + Na<sub>2</sub>O). Additional abbreviation: ab = albite; calc = calcite; carb = carbonate; chl = chlorite; ep = epidote; Kfs = K-feldspar; ms = muscovite; py = pyrite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Impact of hydrothermal alteration on major elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Impact of hydrothermal alteration on trace elements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Harker diagram of Baoshan granodiorite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) REE distribution pattern diagram of granodiorite porphyry. (<b>b</b>) The trace element spider diagram of granodiorite porphyry. Data from [<a href="#B4-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">4</a>]. Chondrite normalization based on the literature [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Cathodoluminescence image of zircon from Baoshan granodiorite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>) U-Pb concordant age and (<b>b</b>) U-Pb weighted mean age of zircons from Baoshan granodiorite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Geochronological constraints on the formation of magmatic rocks and mineralization events in Southern Hunan. Age data source [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">5</a>,<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B11-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">11</a>,<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">12</a>,<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">16</a>,<a href="#B17-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">17</a>,<a href="#B18-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">18</a>,<a href="#B19-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">19</a>,<a href="#B54-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">54</a>,<a href="#B55-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">55</a>,<a href="#B56-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">56</a>,<a href="#B57-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">57</a>,<a href="#B58-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">58</a>,<a href="#B59-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">59</a>,<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">60</a>]. Bt = biotite; Zrn = zircon; Ttn = titanite; Mol = molybdenite; Grt = garnet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) TAS diagram for classification of intrusive rock types [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">61</a>]. (<b>b</b>) Whole-rock A/NK-A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">62</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Discrimination diagrams for granite rock types. (<b>a</b>) Zr-10000*(Ga/Al) diagram [<a href="#B64-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">64</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Al-Na-K–Ca–Fe+Mg diagram [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">65</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Th-Rb diagram [<a href="#B63-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">63</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Partial melting and fractional crystallization trends in rocks. (<b>a</b>) Zr/Nb-Zr diagram; (<b>b</b>) La/Sm-La diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Discrimination diagrams for fractional crystallization. (<b>a</b>) Sr-Eu diagram; (<b>b</b>) Ba-Sr diagram; (<b>c</b>) Dy-Er diagram; (<b>d</b>) Yb-Dy<sub>N</sub>/(La<sub>N</sub><sup>4/13</sup> × Yb<sub>N</sub><sup>9/13</sup>)-Dy/Yb diagram. (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>) according to Kong et al. [<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">10</a>]; (<b>d</b>) according to Liu et al. [<a href="#B9-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">9</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>(<b>a</b>) Whole-rock Rb-Sr diagram and (<b>b</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-t diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Relationship between whole-rock (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub> and ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) with SiO<sub>2</sub> and MgO contents. (<b>a</b>) (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub>-SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram; (<b>b</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram; (<b>c</b>) (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub>-MgO diagram; (<b>d</b>) ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t)-MgO diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Discrimination diagrams for tectonic settings of Baoshan granodiorite porphyry. (<b>a</b>) Rb-Y+Nb tectonic discrimination diagram [<a href="#B106-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">106</a>]; (<b>b</b>) Rb/30-Hf-3Ta tectonic discrimination diagram [<a href="#B107-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">107</a>]. syn-COLG = syn-collisional granites; VAG = volcanic arc granites; Late and post-COLG = late- and post-collisional granites; WPG = within-plate granites; ORG = ocean ridge granites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 22
<p>Comparison of water content characteristics between the Baoshan granodiorite porphyry and W-Sn-related granites. (<b>a</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub>-SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram; (<b>b</b>) V/Sc-SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram. W-Sn-related granite data from the literature [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">45</a>,<a href="#B131-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">131</a>,<a href="#B132-minerals-14-00897" class="html-bibr">132</a>].</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 5679 KiB  
Article
Mineralogical and Geochemical Response to Fluid Infiltration into Cambrian Orthopyroxene-Bearing Granitoids and Gneisses, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica
by Ane K. Engvik, Fernando Corfu, Ilka C. Kleinhanns, Heinrich Taubald and Synnøve Elvevold
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080772 - 29 Jul 2024
Viewed by 755
Abstract
Fluid infiltration into Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic dry, orthopyroxene-bearing granitoids and gneisses in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, has caused changes to rock appearance, mineralogy, and rock chemistry. The main mineralogical changes are the replacement of orthopyroxene by hornblende and biotite, ilmenite by titanite, [...] Read more.
Fluid infiltration into Proterozoic and Early Palaeozoic dry, orthopyroxene-bearing granitoids and gneisses in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, has caused changes to rock appearance, mineralogy, and rock chemistry. The main mineralogical changes are the replacement of orthopyroxene by hornblende and biotite, ilmenite by titanite, and various changes in feldspar structure and composition. Geochemically, these processes resulted in general gains of Si, mostly of Al, and marginally of K and Na but losses of Fe, Mg, Ti, Ca, and P. The isotopic oxygen composition (δ18OSMOW = 6.0‰–9.9‰) is in accordance with that of the magmatic precursor, both for the host rock and infiltrating fluid. U-Pb isotopes in zircon of the altered and unaltered syenite to quartz-monzonite indicate a primary crystallization age of 520.2 ± 1.0 Ma, while titanite defines alteration at 485.5 ± 1.4 Ma. Two sets of gneiss samples yield a Rb-Sr age of 517 ± 6 Ma and a Sm-Nd age of 536 ± 23 Ma. The initial Sr and Nd isotopic ratios suggest derivation of the gneisses from a relatively juvenile source but with a very strong metasomatic effect that introduced radiogenic Sr into the system. The granitoid data indicate instead a derivation from Mid-Proterozoic crust, probably with additions of mantle components. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Geographical situation map of central Dronning Maud Land. (<b>b</b>) Geological map of the studied part of Mühlig–Hofmannfjella and Orvinfjella. The numbers indicate the sampled localities (Table 1) (modified from [<a href="#B16-minerals-14-00772" class="html-bibr">16</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field photos. (<b>a</b>) Nunatak of orthopyroxene-bearing granitoid with the characteristic dark brownish outcrop color (Håhelleregga). (<b>b</b>) Alteration halo around discordant aplitic vein crosscutting migmatitc gneiss (locality 7, Kubusfjellet). The vein (arrow) is about 5 cm thick with an alteration halo extending 0.5 m into the host rock. The field of view is 1.5 m. (<b>c</b>) Alteration halo around the pegmatitic vein cutting dark brownish-colored orthopyroxene-bearing syenite (locality 5, Trollslottet). The field of view is about 1 m. (<b>d</b>) A high density of crisscrossing veins causes heavy alteration of the dark orthopyroxene-bearing syenite of the Trollslottet nunatak (Locality 5, the cliff face is about 70 m high).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Micrographs of pristine orthopyroxene-bearing gneiss and granitoid intrusions (mineral abbreviations following Whitney and Evans [<a href="#B38-minerals-14-00772" class="html-bibr">38</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Garnet-orthopyroxene gneiss with major quartz, perthitic K-feldspar, and plagioclase occur equigranular with embayed and triple-point grain boundaries (sample AHA193A, plane light). (<b>b</b>) Euhedral orthopyroxene in the quartz and feldspar matrix (sample AHA217, orthopyroxene granite, plane light). (<b>c</b>) Coarse subhedral amphibole with medium-grained biotite and orthopyroxene (sample AHA144, orthopyroxene-bearing quartz-monzonite, plane light). (<b>d</b>) Amphibole and biotite in the matrix of quartz and perthitic K-feldspar; note the coarse crystals of biotite (sample AHA197, orthopyroxene-bearing granite, plane light). (<b>e</b>) Amphibole and biotite in the matrix of perthite, plagioclase, and quartz; note the well-developed coarse crystals of amphibole and biotite (sample AHA197, orthopyroxene-bearing granite, plane light). (<b>f</b>) Fine-grained quartz and feldspars of aplite but with a strong heterogeneity including some coarse grains. Remark dusty appearance of quartz and feldspar (sample AHA200II, crossed polarizers).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Replacement of mafic minerals in alteration zones (micrographs, plane light). (<b>a</b>) Biotite + quartz fine-grained symplectites (sample AHA107, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>b</b>) Amphibole + quartz fine-grained symplectites (sample AHA107, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>c</b>) Replacement of amphibole along cleavage planes and microfractures to biotite (white arrows) and Fe-oxide (black arrow; sample AHA145 altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>d</b>) Replacement of amphibole to biotite along cleavage planes, micro-cracks, and sub-grain boundaries (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>e</b>) Replacement of coarse biotite to finer biotite grains and of ilmenite to titanite (sample AHA199, altered quartz monzonite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Feldspars in alteration zones. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) Replacement of original feldspar to subgrains and production of a high density of micropores, fluid inclusions, and tiny grains of sericite and biotite. Plane light (<b>a</b>) and crossed polarizers (<b>b</b>) (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite). (<b>c</b>) Replacement of perthitic K-feldspar to microcline (crossed polarizers, sample AHA 193C, altered gneiss). (<b>d</b>) Alteration of perthitic K-feldspar along microfractures (arrows) and replacement to microcline (crossed polarizers, sample AHA199, altered syenite). (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) Sericitization (arrows) and growth of biotite (brown phase) and titanite along microfractures in plagioclase. Plane light (<b>e</b>) and crossed polarizers (<b>f</b>) (sample AHA145, altered quartz-monzonite).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>TAS-plot. Arrows link the unaltered and altered samples with their direction pointing to the alteration. Symbols are the same as in Figure 8 and Figure 9.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>U-Pb analyses of zircon and titanite in orthopyroxene-bearing granite (sample AHA197) and alteration zone (sample AHA199). Ellipses (full lines for zircon and dashed lines for titanite) indicate 2 sigma uncertainty.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Radiogenic isotopic plot. Arrows link the unaltered to the altered sample and their direction points to the alteration. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) <sup>87</sup>Rb/<sup>86</sup>Sr vs. <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr. (<b>c</b>) <sup>147</sup>Sm/<sup>144</sup>Nd vs. <sup>143</sup>Nd/<sup>144</sup>Nd. See <a href="#sec5-minerals-14-00772" class="html-sec">Section 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geochemical variation crossing alteration zones from unaltered rock (<b>left</b>) to altered rock (<b>right</b>). Symbols are the same as in <a href="#minerals-14-00772-f006" class="html-fig">Figure 6</a>.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8347 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Geochemistry, and In Situ Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Compositions of a Tourmaline-Bearing Leucogranite in Eastern Tethyan Himalaya: Implications for Tectonic Setting and Rare Metal Mineralization
by Yangchen Drolma, Kaijun Li, Yubin Li, Jinshu Zhang, Chengye Yang, Gen Zhang, Ruoming Li and Duo Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(8), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14080755 - 26 Jul 2024
Viewed by 860
Abstract
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in [...] Read more.
Himalayan leucogranite is an excellent target for understanding the orogenic process of the India–Asia collision, but its origin and tectonic significance are still under debate. An integrated study of geochronology, geochemistry, and in situ Sr-Nd-Hf isotopes was conducted for a tourmaline-bearing leucogranite in the eastern Tethyan Himalaya using LA-ICP-MS, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, and ICP-MS and LA-MC-ICP-MS, respectively. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of zircon and monazite showed that it was emplaced at ~19 Ma. The leucogranite had high SiO2 and Al2O3 contents ranging from 73.16 to 73.99 wt.% and 15.05 to 15.24 wt.%, respectively. It was characterized by a high aluminum saturation index (1.14–1.19) and Rb/Sr ratio (3.58–6.35), which is characteristic of S-type granite. The leucogranite was enriched in light rare-earth elements (LREEs; e.g., La and Ce) and large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; e.g., Rb, K, and Pb) and depleted in heavy rare-earth elements (e.g., Tm, Yb, and Lu) and high field strength elements (HFSEs; e.g., Nb, Zr, and Ti). It was characterized by high I Sr (t) (0.7268–0.7281) and low ε Nd (t) (−14.6 to −13.2) and ε Hf (t) (−12.6 to −9.47), which was consistent with the isotopic characteristics of the Higher Himalayan Sequence. Petrogenetically, the origin of the leucogranite is best explained by the decompression-induced muscovite dehydration melting of an ancient metapelitic source within the Higher Himalayan Sequence during regional extension due to the movement of the South Tibetan Detachment System (STDS). The significantly high lithium and beryllium contents of the leucogranite and associated pegmatite suggest that Himalayan leucogranites possess huge potential for lithium and beryllium exploration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Geological sketch map of the Himalayas showing the distribution of Himalayan leucogranites (after [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Simplified geological map of the Luozha tourmaline-bearing leucogranite (after [<a href="#B25-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">25</a>]). Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: And, andalusite; Grt, garnet; St, staurolite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative field photographs and photomicrographs of the LTLG and spodumene-bearing pegmatites. (<b>a</b>) Field photograph showing oriented tourmalines of the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) Photomicrograph of the LTLG; (<b>c</b>) Field photograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite and (<b>d</b>) Photomicrograph of the spodumene-bearing pegmatite. Mineral abbreviations [<a href="#B26-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">26</a>]: Bt, biotite; Kfs, K-feldspar; Ms, muscovite; Pl, plagioclase; Qz, quartz; Spd, Spodumene; Tur, tourmaline.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>U-Pb dating results of the LTLG. (<b>a</b>) Cathodoluminescence images for representative zircons from the LTLG; (<b>b</b>) U-Pb zircon concordia diagram of the LTLG; Tera–Wasserburg concordia diagram for zircons (<b>c</b>) and monazites (<b>d</b>) of the LTLG. The red circle indicate the location of U-Pb dating analysis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O) (after [<a href="#B39-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">39</a>]), (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O-CaO) (after [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">40</a>]), (<b>c</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> vs. K<sub>2</sub>O (after [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">41</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) A/CNK vs. A/NK (after [<a href="#B42-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">42</a>]) for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) Spidergrams of the LTLG. The values of chondrite and primitive mantle are from McDonough and Sun [<a href="#B43-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">43</a>]. The data of S-type (blue field) and highly fractional (green field) leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) in situ and whole rock Sr-Nd isotopic data and (<b>b</b>) Zircon Hf isotopic data of the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. FeO*/MgO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>b</b>) (Zr + Nb + Ce + Y) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/CaO (after [<a href="#B48-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">48</a>]); (<b>c</b>) Rb vs. Th and (<b>d</b>) Rb vs. Y (after [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">50</a>]) for the LTLG. The data of S-type granites from the Interview River Suite are from Chappell [<a href="#B45-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">45</a>]. The data of S-type leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Zr/Hf and (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. (La/Yb)<sub>N</sub> for the LTLG. The data of S-type and highly fractional leucogranites from the Ramba area are from Liu et al. [<a href="#B12-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">12</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. (Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O)/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>b</b>) (CaO + TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) vs. CaO/(TiO<sub>2</sub> + TFeO + MgO) (after [<a href="#B60-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">60</a>]), (<b>c</b>) Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. CaO/TiO<sub>2</sub> (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]); and (<b>d</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Rb/Ba (after [<a href="#B61-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">61</a>]) for the LTLG. MP, metapelites; MGW, metagreywackes; AMP, amphibolites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Ba vs. Rb/Sr and (<b>b</b>) Sr vs. Rb/Sr (after [<a href="#B62-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">62</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Plots of <b>ε<sub>Nd</sub></b>(t) vs. <b>I<sub>Sr</sub></b>(t) for the LTLG. Fields of Gangdese batholith, Higher Himalayan Sequence, and Lesser Himalayan Sequence are from Wu et al. [<a href="#B5-minerals-14-00755" class="html-bibr">5</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Plots of (<b>a</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Li; (<b>b</b>) Rb/Sr vs. Be; (<b>c</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Li; (<b>d</b>) Zr/Hf vs. Be; (<b>e</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Li; and (<b>f</b>) Nb/Ta vs. Be for the LTLG.</p>
Full article ">
29 pages, 5946 KiB  
Article
Geochronology, Geochemical Characterization and Tectonic Background of Volcanic Rocks of the Longjiang Formation in the Lengjimanda Plate Area, Middle Da Hinggan Mountains
by Shi-Chang Wang, Yu-Jie Hao, Lu Shi, Zhen Tang and Shuang Zhu
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 719; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070719 - 16 Jul 2024
Viewed by 715
Abstract
The Lengjimanda plate is situated in the middle section of the Da Hinggan mountains, in the eastern section of the Tianshan Xingmeng orogenic belt. To determine the formation age of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation in this area, to explore their [...] Read more.
The Lengjimanda plate is situated in the middle section of the Da Hinggan mountains, in the eastern section of the Tianshan Xingmeng orogenic belt. To determine the formation age of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation in this area, to explore their origin and tectonic background, and to reconstruct the geodynamic evolution of the region, this study conducted petrological, zircon U–Pb geochronological, geochemical, and isotopic analyses of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation. The Longjiang formation’s volcanic rocks are primarily composed of trachyandesite, trachyte trachydacite, and andesite, which are intermediate basic volcanic rocks. They are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements, are depleted in high-field-strength elements, are significantly fractionated between light and heavy rare earth elements, and exhibit a moderate negative Eu anomaly in most samples. The results of the LA–ICP–MS zircon U–Pb dating indicate that the volcanic rocks in this group were formed in the Early Cretaceous period at 129.1 ± 0.82 Ma. The zircon εHf(t) ranges from +1.13 to +43.77, the tDM2 ranges from +655 to +1427 Ma, the initial Sr ratio (87Sr/86Sr)i ranges from 0.7030 to 0.7036, and the εNd(t) ranges from +2.1 to +6.6. Based on the geochemical compositions and isotopic characteristics of the rocks, the initial magma of the volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation originated from the partial melting of basaltic crustal materials, with a source material inferred to be depleted mantle-derived young crustal. These rocks were formed in a superimposed post-collisional and continental arc environment, possibly associated with the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean closure and the oblique subduction of the Pacific plate. This study addresses a research gap regarding the volcanic rocks of the Longjiang formation in this area. Its findings can be applied to exploration and prospecting in the region. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The sample structural map in the Northeast region [<a href="#B40-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">40</a>]; (<b>b</b>) plate geological map of LingjiManda plate, Da Hinggan Mountains [<a href="#B41-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">41</a>]; and (<b>c</b>) geological cross-section view of Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Hand specimen photo (<b>a</b>) and microscope photos (<b>b</b>–<b>f</b>) of the Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) TWG05; (<b>b</b>) TWG01; (<b>c</b>) TWG02; (<b>d</b>) TWG04; (<b>e</b>) TWG05; (<b>f</b>) TWG06, Sa: sanidine; Pl: plagioclase; Mag: magnetite; Afs: alkalifeldspar; Bt: biotite; Qtz: quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>U–Pb zircons cathodoluminescence images from the volcanic rocks of the Longjiang formation at Lengjimanda plate. Circles indicate the locations of U–Pb analysis on zircons, along with their respective zircon numbers, and age information listed below. (<b>a</b>) TWG01, (<b>b</b>) TWG04, (<b>c</b>) TWG05, (<b>d</b>) TWG06.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Diagram of (N<sub>2</sub>O+K<sub>2</sub>O) vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> of volcanic rocks of Longjiang formation [<a href="#B49-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">49</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Major elements classification diagrams of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O vs. SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">50</a>]; (<b>b</b>) A/NK vs. A/CNK diagram [<a href="#B50-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">50</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns [<a href="#B51-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">51</a>] and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized spider diagrams [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">52</a>] of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Concordant and weighted diagrams of the zircon U–Pb age of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. Error ellipses are shown for 1-sigma level of uncertainty. (<b>a</b>) TWG01, (<b>b</b>) TWG04, (<b>c</b>) TWG05, (<b>d</b>) TWG06, (<b>e</b>) Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, (<b>f</b>) weighted diagrams of the Longjiang formation volcanic rocks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustration of magmatic evolution of volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation of Lengjimanda plate [<a href="#B65-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">65</a>]. (<b>a</b>) La/Yb vs. La and (<b>b</b>) La/Sm vs. La.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Adakite discrimination diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y vs. Y diagram; (<b>b</b>) (La/Yb) <sub>N</sub> vs. (Yb) n diagram [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">71</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p><span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Hf</sub> (<span class="html-italic">t</span>) vs. age diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. East CAOB: East Asian Orogenic Belt Eastern part [<a href="#B21-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p><span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Nd</sub>(t) vs. <span class="html-italic">ε</span><sub>Sr</sub>(t) diagram of volcanic rocks in the Longjiang formation of Lengjimanda plate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Pb isotope composition diagram of Longjiang formation volcanic rocks, Lengjimanda plate. Orogene: Orogenic belt. ((<b>a</b>), [<a href="#B83-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">83</a>]; (<b>b</b>,<b>c</b>), [<a href="#B84-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">84</a>]; (<b>d</b>), [<a href="#B80-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">80</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Structural identification diagram of volcanic rocks in Longjiang formation, Lengjimanda plate [<a href="#B107-minerals-14-00719" class="html-bibr">107</a>]. (<b>a</b>) Intraplate environment (WIP), (<b>b</b>) continental arc environment (CAP), post-collision environment (PAP), initial ocean arc environment (IOP), late ocean arc environment (LOP).</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 84655 KiB  
Article
Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of the Granite Porphyry in the Sinongduo Ag-Pb-Zn Deposit, Central Tibet: Constraints from Geochronology, Geochemistry, and Sr-Nd Isotopes
by Peng Zhang, Zhuang Li, Feng Zhao and Xinkai Liu
Minerals 2024, 14(7), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/min14070710 - 12 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1028
Abstract
The Paleocene ore deposits related to the India–Asia continental collision are widely distributed in the Gangdese metallogenic belt. Among these, Sinongduo is the first discovered epithermal Ag-Pb-Zn deposit in the Lhasa terrane. However, there is still controversy over the ore-forming magma in this [...] Read more.
The Paleocene ore deposits related to the India–Asia continental collision are widely distributed in the Gangdese metallogenic belt. Among these, Sinongduo is the first discovered epithermal Ag-Pb-Zn deposit in the Lhasa terrane. However, there is still controversy over the ore-forming magma in this deposit. This study mainly reports new zircon U-Pb isotopic ages, whole-rock geochemistry, and Sr-Nd isotopic data for the granite porphyry from the Sinongduo deposit, aiming to discuss the petrogenesis and tectonic setting of the granite porphyry and its genetic link between the Ag-Pb-Zn mineralization. The results show that zircon U-Pb analyses yield ages of 62.9 ± 0.5 Ma and 59.0 ± 0.7 Ma for the granite porphyry, indicating that it formed during the Paleocene period. The timing of the granite porphyry intrusion is contemporaneous with the mineralization, suggesting that it is most likely the ore-forming magma in the Sinongduo deposit. The granite porphyry has high SiO2 and K2O, moderate Al2O3, and low Na2O, CaO, and FeOT contents, and it displays significant enrichments in LREEs and LILEs and depletions in HREEs and HFSEs, with negative Eu anomaly. The granite porphyry is a peraluminous series and can be classified as S-type granite. Moreover, the granite porphyry shows relatively high ratios of (87Sr/86Sr)i and low values of εNd(t). The geochemical and isotopic compositions of the granite porphyry from the Sinongduo area are similar to those of the upper continental crust, which suggests that the granite porphyry was most likely derived from the melting of the upper continental crust in the Lhasa terrane during the India–Asia collisional tectonic setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genesis and Evolution of Pb-Zn-Ag Polymetallic Deposits: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Simplified map showing the location of the Himalayan–Tibetan orogeny; (<b>b</b>) tectonic framework of the Lhasa terrane (modified after [<a href="#B7-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">7</a>]); (<b>c</b>) diagram showing the distribution of the magmatic rocks and the associated deposits in the Lhasa terrane (modified after [<a href="#B52-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">52</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The simplified geological map (<b>a</b>) and lithostratigraphy of borehole BZK1502 (<b>b</b>) of the Sinongduo deposit (modified after [<a href="#B20-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">20</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The hand specimen photographs and photomicrographs showing the main ore structure and textures in the mineral assemblages from the Sinongduo deposit. (<b>a</b>) The rhyolite porphyry and crystal tuff with sphalerite, galena, and pyrite sulfide minerals; (<b>b</b>) the rhyolite porphyry cut by the sphalerite–galena vein; (<b>c</b>) the chalcopyrite in the sphalerite; (<b>d</b>) the euhedral pyrite in the quartz; (<b>e</b>) the galena and sphalerite; (<b>f</b>) the pearceite and argentite; (<b>g</b>) the hematite and pearceite developed in the pyrite; (<b>h</b>) the acanthite in the jasper; (<b>i</b>) the pyrargyrite developed in pyrite fractures. Abbreviations: Sp, sphalerite; Gn, galena; Py, pyrite; Ccp, chalcopyrite; Arn, argentite; Pea, pearceite; Hem, hematite; Aca, acanthite; Pyr, pyrargyrite; III, illite; Jas, jasper; Ser, sericite; Chl, chlorite; Q, quartz.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>(<b>a</b>) The field relationship of rocks, (<b>b</b>) hand specimen photograph, and (<b>c</b>–<b>e</b>) cross-polarized photomicrographs of the granite porphyry in the Sinongduo deposit. Abbreviations: Kfs—potassium feldspar; Q—quartz; Ser—sericite; Bt—biotite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Representative cathodoluminescence images of zircon grains for the (<b>a</b>) SND-G1 and (<b>b</b>) 1502-98 granite porphyry samples from the Sinongduo deposit. The yellow circles are 32 μm in diameter and show the location of the U-Pb analytical sites.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb concordia and weighted mean age diagrams of samples (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) SND-G1 and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) 1502-98 for the Sinongduo granite porphyry.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Geochemical diagrams for the granite porphyry from the Sinongduo deposit. (<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O diagram after [<a href="#B69-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">69</a>]; (<b>b</b>) A/NK versus A/CNK diagram after [<a href="#B70-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">70</a>]. Data for the Sinongduo volcanic rocks are from [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">71</a>]; data for the Paleocene granites are from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>(<b>a</b>) The chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle normalized trace element patterns for the Sinongduo granite porphyry. Data for the chondrite and primitive mantle normalization are from [<a href="#B73-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">73</a>], data for the Indian Ocean sediments, UCC, and LCC are from [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">74</a>], Sinongduo volcanic rock data are from [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">71</a>], and Paleocene granite data are from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">72</a>]. Abbreviations: UCC, upper continental crust; LCC, lower continental crust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The Sr-Nd isotopic compositions for the granite porphyry from the Sinongduo deposit. Data for the Indian Ocean MORB, UCC, and LCC are from [<a href="#B75-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">75</a>,<a href="#B76-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">76</a>,<a href="#B77-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">77</a>]. Data for global subducting sediment (GLOSS) are from [<a href="#B78-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">78</a>]. Data for the Sinongduo volcanic rocks are from [<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">71</a>]; data for the Paleocene granites are from [<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-(Na<sub>2</sub>O + K<sub>2</sub>O) versus CaO versus FeO<sup>T</sup> + MgO diagram (after [<a href="#B81-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">81</a>]). Data for the Paleocene I-type volcanic rocks are from [<a href="#B32-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">32</a>,<a href="#B33-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">33</a>]; other data from the literature are from [<a href="#B10-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">10</a>,<a href="#B71-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">71</a>,<a href="#B72-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">72</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus ε<sub>Nd</sub>(<span class="html-italic">t</span>), (<b>b</b>) SiO<sub>2</sub> versus (<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub>, (<b>c</b>) Nb/Ta versus Zr, and (<b>d</b>) Nb/Ta versus Nb diagrams (after [<a href="#B88-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">88</a>]. Data for the BCC are from [<a href="#B74-minerals-14-00710" class="html-bibr">74</a>]; other data sources are the same as that in the <a href="#minerals-14-00710-f009" class="html-fig">Figure 9</a>. Abbreviations: UCC, upper continental crust; LCC, lower continental crust; BCC, basin continental crust.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 8094 KiB  
Article
Zircon U-Pb Age, Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopic Characteristics of Baiyinhushuo Adakite in Inner Mongolia: Implications for Tectonic Evolution
by Yuxu Fan, Qinghui Xiao, Yang Cheng and Yan Li
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(14), 6058; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146058 - 11 Jul 2024
Viewed by 896
Abstract
The petrogenesis and geodynamic implications of the Early Paleozoic adakitic rocks in the east of Inner Mongolia remain topics of debate. This study presents new petrology data through zircon U-Pb age and Lu-Hf isotopic composition, whole-rock major-trace element geochemistry, and Sr-Nd isotopes from [...] Read more.
The petrogenesis and geodynamic implications of the Early Paleozoic adakitic rocks in the east of Inner Mongolia remain topics of debate. This study presents new petrology data through zircon U-Pb age and Lu-Hf isotopic composition, whole-rock major-trace element geochemistry, and Sr-Nd isotopes from adakitic rocks. The zircon U-Pb dating results demonstrate that the formation age is 242.8 ± 1.0 Ma, which is the product of Early Triassic magmatism. Petrology and geochemical study have shown that the granodiorite have high SiO2 (66.93~69.40%), Al2O3 (15.37~15.43%), and MgO (1.35~1.55%), with LREE enrichment and HREE deficit, and they have high Sr, low Y, and high Sr/Y ratios, showing typical signatures of adakitic rocks. The εHf(t) values of zircon vary between +11.3 and +13.8, with low whole-rock (87Sr/86Sr)i (0.703382) and positive εNd(t) values, and the average Mg# of the rock is 56.14, suggesting that adakite derived from partial melting of MORB materials and magma interaction with the mantle. Comprehensive analysis suggests that during the Late Permian to Early Triassic, the subducted slab of the Paleo-Asian Ocean broke off, and the residual oceanic slab preserved in the mantle beneath the subduction zone underwent partial melting, generating adakitic magma. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Distribution range of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB; modified from [<a href="#B9-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">9</a>]). (<b>b</b>) Sketched tectonic map of the adakite in Baiyinhushuo, Inner Mongolia (modified from [<a href="#B20-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">20</a>,<a href="#B21-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">21</a>]). (<b>c</b>) Simplified geologic map of the study area [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Field outcrop (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) and photomicrograph (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) of granodiorite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Representative CL images of analyzed zircons. Ages (Ma) and analysis spots (cycle) are marked on the zircons.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Concordia and weight diagrams of U-Pb ages of zircons for the granodiorite.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) Total alkalis—SiO<sub>2</sub> (TAS) [<a href="#B29-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">29</a>]; (<b>b</b>) ANK-ACNK plot [<a href="#B30-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">30</a>]; (<b>c</b>) K<sub>2</sub>O-SiO<sub>2</sub> [<a href="#B31-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">31</a>]; (<b>d</b>) TFeO/MgO-SiO<sub>2</sub> diagram [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B32-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">32</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Chondrite-normalized REE pattern and (<b>b</b>) primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B33-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">33</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Diagrams of (<b>a</b>) Sr/Y–Y [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>] and (<b>b</b>) (La/Yb)N–(Yb)N for granitoids in Baiyinhushuo (after [<a href="#B37-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">37</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>SiO<sub>2</sub>-Mg<sup>#</sup> (<b>a</b>) diagram and SiO<sub>2</sub>-MgO diagram (<b>b</b>) for the in Baiyinhushuo area (after [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B45-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">45</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Rb-(Y + Nb) and (<b>b</b>) Rb-(Yb + Ta) tectonic discriminant diagrams of the Baiyinhushuo adakite (modified from [<a href="#B15-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">15</a>,<a href="#B47-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">47</a>]).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>(<sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr)<sub>i</sub>—ε<sub>Nd</sub>(t) isotope composition of Baiyinhushuo (after [<a href="#B51-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">51</a>]). Date sources: intra-oceanic adakite of Tibet is from [<a href="#B49-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">49</a>]; adakite of modern intra-oceanic arc is from [<a href="#B52-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">52</a>,<a href="#B53-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">53</a>]; adakite in Linxi is from [<a href="#B8-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">8</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>ε<sub>Hf</sub>(t)-T diagram of zircon (after [<a href="#B55-applsci-14-06058" class="html-bibr">55</a>]).</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop