[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Next Issue
Volume 9, January
Previous Issue
Volume 8, November
You seem to have javascript disabled. Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled.
 
 

Drones, Volume 8, Issue 12 (December 2024) – 91 articles

Cover Story (view full-size image): Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is revolutionizing modern transportation by integrating aerial networks into urban environments. This paper reviews the latest advancements in UAM communications and networking, highlighting enabling technologies, innovative methodologies, and unresolved challenges. It focuses on communication protocols, network architectures, and the role of satellite and 5G networks in supporting UAM operations. The study offers valuable insights into the current state and future directions of UAM systems, contributing to the development of efficient and resilient urban aerial transport networks. View this paper
  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 17849 KiB  
Article
Robust Formation Control for Unmanned Ground Vehicles Using Onboard Visual Sensors and Machine Learning
by Mingfei Li, Haibin Liu and Feng Xie
Drones 2024, 8(12), 787; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120787 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 661
Abstract
The performance of unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) formation is crucial for large-scale material transport. In a non-communicative environment, visual perception plays a central role in formation control. However, due to unstable lighting conditions, dust, fog, and visual occlusions, developing a high-precision visual formation [...] Read more.
The performance of unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) formation is crucial for large-scale material transport. In a non-communicative environment, visual perception plays a central role in formation control. However, due to unstable lighting conditions, dust, fog, and visual occlusions, developing a high-precision visual formation control technology that does not rely on external markers remains a significant challenge in UGVs. This study developed a new UGV formation controller that relies solely on onboard visual sensors and proposed a teacher–student training method, TSTMIPI, combining the PPO algorithm with imitation learning, which significantly improves the control precision and convergence speed of the vision-based reinforcement learning formation controller. To further enhance formation control stability, we constructed a belief state encoder (BSE) based on convolutional neural networks, which effectively integrates visual perception and proprioceptive information. Simulation results show that the control strategy combining TSTMIPI and BSE not only eliminates the reliance on external markers but also significantly improves control precision under different noise levels and visual occlusion conditions, surpassing existing visual formation control methods in maintaining the desired distance and angular precision. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Overview of the training methods and validation. We first train a teacher policy with access to privileged simulation data using reinforcement learning (RL). This teacher policy is then distilled into a student policy, which is trained to imitate the teacher’s actions and to reconstruct the true distance and angle of the follower relative to the leader from augmented visual observations. We deploy the student policy for validation in the apartment, hall, and city scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The teacher network required for PPO training.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The belief state encoder (BSE).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Detailed architecture of the convolutional blocks in the BSE module.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Reward curves obtained during training.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Real-time error curves for the formation control of the TSTMIPI-BSE, TSTMIPI, and PURE-RL controllers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison test between visual-only and multi-modal inputs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Evaluation deployment scenarios. (<b>a</b>): Factory scenario; (<b>b</b>): apartment scenario; (<b>c</b>): hall scenario, (<b>d</b>): city scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Test results for dynamic random motion formation. (<b>a</b>) shows the motion trajectories of the leader and followers in four scenarios. (<b>b</b>) displays a real-time comparison of the leader’s velocity with the controller outputs in the four scenarios. (<b>c</b>) describes the real-time errors in the x-direction, y-direction, and relative angles between the leader and follower.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Stability and convergence test results. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) show the poor initial states in the factory, residential, apartment, and city scenarios, respectively. (<b>e</b>,<b>f</b>) are the real-time relative distance and relative angle between the follower and the leader.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Real-time status of occlusion testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Formation control results under different noise conditions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Formation control results of TSTMIP-BSE under camera noise levels ranging from 0 to 0.5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Formation control results of TSTMIP-BSE under different external environments.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 10999 KiB  
Article
A Framework for Detecting and Managing Non-Point-Source Pollution in Agricultural Areas Using GeoAI and UAVs
by Miso Park, Heung-Min Kim, Youngmin Kim, Suho Bak, Tak-Young Kim and Seon Woong Jang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 786; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120786 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 758
Abstract
This study proposes a novel framework for detecting and managing non-point-source (NPS) pollution in agricultural areas using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI). High-resolution UAV imagery, combined with the YOLOv8 instance segmentation model, was employed to accurately detect and classify [...] Read more.
This study proposes a novel framework for detecting and managing non-point-source (NPS) pollution in agricultural areas using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI). High-resolution UAV imagery, combined with the YOLOv8 instance segmentation model, was employed to accurately detect and classify various NPS sources, such as livestock barns, compost heaps, greenhouses, and mulching films. The spatial information, including the area and volume of detected objects, was analyzed to track temporal changes and evaluate management strategies. The framework integrates remote sensing, deep learning, and geographic information system (GIS) analysis to enhance decision-making processes, providing detailed insight into NPS pollution dynamics over time. This approach not only improves the efficiency of NPS monitoring but also facilitates proactive management by offering precise location and environmental impact data. The results indicate that this framework can significantly improve resource allocation and environmental management practices, particularly in agriculture-dominated regions susceptible to NPS pollution, thereby contributing to the sustainable development of these areas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Framework for detecting and managing NPS pollution in agricultural areas using UAVs and GeoAI.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Original images of a non-point-source pollution source, area calculation, DSM, and volume sum.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of grouping compost objects and calculating spatial information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Examples of the applied classification of grades.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Tiled orthophotos showing NPS pollution and its labeled visualization.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Study area: (<b>a</b>) map showing the Hakpo-ri area, Bugok-myeon, Changnyeong-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea; (<b>b</b>) orthophotos of the Hakpo-ri area taken on 17 May, 30 May, 12 June, and 26 June 2024.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Qualitative performance comparison of YOLOv8, U-Net, and FCN on sample images from the validation dataset: (<b>a</b>) Comparison for Sample 1, showing input image, ground truth, and model predictions (FCN, U-Net, YOLOv8); (<b>b</b>) Comparison for Sample 2, showing input image, ground truth, and model predictions (FCN, U-Net, YOLOv8); (<b>c</b>) Comparison for Sample 3, showing input image, ground truth, and model predictions (FCN, U-Net, YOLOv8).</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Mapping using detection results: (<b>a</b>) zoomed-in images with overlaid detection results for each class; (<b>b</b>) composite mapping of all detected NPS pollution sources over four dates.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Temporal analysis of NPS pollution detection: (<b>a</b>) counts by class; (<b>b</b>) areas by class.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Temporal analysis of compost grade distribution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Shortest distances to watersheds for each class, shown as a boxplot.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Changes in mulching film presence over time: Images from 17 May and 26 June.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Causes of misdetections on 26 June: (<b>a</b>) Greenhouses misdetected as barns due to changes in covers; (<b>b</b>) Buildings misdetected as barns due to sunlight reflections on roofs. The red boxes highlight areas where the model falsely detected barns, illustrating the challenges caused by structural and environmental changes.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 2582 KiB  
Article
A Long-Range and Low-Cost Emergency Radio Beacon for Small Drones
by Juana M. Martínez-Heredia, Jorge Olivera, Francisco Colodro, Manuel Bravo and Manuel R. Arahal
Drones 2024, 8(12), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120785 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 803
Abstract
The increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the commercial and recreational sectors has led to a heightened demand for effective recovery solutions after a crash, particularly for lightweight drones. This paper presents the development of a long-range and low-cost emergency radio [...] Read more.
The increasing use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the commercial and recreational sectors has led to a heightened demand for effective recovery solutions after a crash, particularly for lightweight drones. This paper presents the development of a long-range and low-cost emergency radio beacon designed specifically for small UAVs. Unlike traditional emergency locator transmitters (ELTs), our proposed beacon addresses the unique needs of UAVs by reducing size, weight, and cost, while maximizing range and power efficiency. The device utilizes a global system for mobile (GSM)-based communication module to transmit location data via short message service (SMS), eliminating the need for specialized receivers and expanding the operational range even in obstacle-rich environments. Additionally, a built-in global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver provides precise coordinates, activated only upon impact detection through an accelerometer, thereby saving power during normal operations. Experimental tests confirm the extended range, high precision, and compatibility of the prototype with common mobile networks. Cost-effective and easy to use, this beacon improves UAV recovery efforts by providing reliable localization data to users in real time, thus safeguarding the UAV investment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>General structure of the proposed radio beacon system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>General flowchart of the main program of the microcontroller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Prototype of the control circuit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Proposed radio beacon: (<b>a</b>) implemented prototype; (<b>b</b>) box container.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The radio beacon prototype mounted on a multirotor for testing.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Text message with the link to the location received during the accident drill and a map of the location.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 1148 KiB  
Article
DRL-Based Improved UAV Swarm Control for Simultaneous Coverage and Tracking with Prior Experience Utilization
by Yiting Chen, Runfeng Chen, Yuchong Huang, Zehao Xiong and Jie Li
Drones 2024, 8(12), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120784 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 688
Abstract
Area coverage and target tracking are important applications of UAV swarms. However, attempting to perform both tasks simultaneously can be a challenge, particularly under resource constraints. In such scenarios, UAV swarms must collaborate to cover extensive areas while simultaneously tracking multiple targets. This [...] Read more.
Area coverage and target tracking are important applications of UAV swarms. However, attempting to perform both tasks simultaneously can be a challenge, particularly under resource constraints. In such scenarios, UAV swarms must collaborate to cover extensive areas while simultaneously tracking multiple targets. This paper proposes a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based, scalable UAV swarm control method for a simultaneous coverage and tracking (SCT) task, called the SCT-DRL algorithm. SCT-DRL simplifies the interaction between UAV swarms into a series of pairwise interactions and aggregates the information of perceived targets in advance, based on which forms the control framework with a variable number of neighboring UAVs and targets. Another highlight of SCT-DRL is using the trajectories of the traditional one-step optimization method to initialize the value network, which encourages the UAVs to select the actions leading to the state with less rest time to task completion to avoid extensive random exploration at the beginning of training. SCT-DRL can be seen as a special improvement of the traditional one-step optimization method, shaped by the samples derived from the latter, and gradually overcomes the inherent myopic issue with the far-sighted value estimation through RL training. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through numerical experiments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Reinforcement learning action strategies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Value network diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Value network training effect diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The configuration of two-UAV area coverage and the statistics of coverage time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The comparison of coverage time under different two-UAV distances.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The statistics of task completion time in four-UAV coverage and six-UAV coverage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The statistics of completion time under different numbers of UAVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>A visualization of the SCT-DRL execution.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of target detection numbers of all algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of coverage rate among all algorithms.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 8140 KiB  
Article
Improving Satellite-Based Retrieval of Maize Leaf Chlorophyll Content by Joint Observation with UAV Hyperspectral Data
by Siqi Yang, Ran Kang, Tianhe Xu, Jian Guo, Caiyun Deng, Li Zhang, Lulu Si and Hermann Josef Kaufmann
Drones 2024, 8(12), 783; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120783 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 800
Abstract
While satellite-based remote sensing offers a promising avenue for large-scale LCC estimations, the accuracy of evaluations is often decreased by mixed pixels, attributable to distinct farming practices and diverse soil conditions. To overcome these challenges and to account for maize intercropping with soybeans [...] Read more.
While satellite-based remote sensing offers a promising avenue for large-scale LCC estimations, the accuracy of evaluations is often decreased by mixed pixels, attributable to distinct farming practices and diverse soil conditions. To overcome these challenges and to account for maize intercropping with soybeans at different growth stages combined with varying soil backgrounds, a hyperspectral database for maize was set up using a random linear mixed model applied to hyperspectral data recorded by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Four methods, namely, Euclidean distance, Minkowski distance, Manhattan distance, and Cosine similarity, were used to compare vegetation spectra from Sentinel-2A with the newly constructed database. In a next step, widely used vegetation indices such as NDVI, NAOC, and CAI were tested to find the optimum method for LCC retrieval, validated by field measurements. The results show that the NAOC had the strongest correlation with ground sampling information (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 0.94 μg/cm2, and MAE = 0.67 μg/cm2). Additional field measurements sampled at other farming areas were applied to validate the method’s transferability and generalization. Here too, validation results showed a highly precise LCC estimation (R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 1.10 μg/cm2, and MAE = 1.09 μg/cm2), demonstrating that integrating UAV hyperspectral data with a random linear mixed model significantly improves satellite-based LCC retrievals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Sketch map of the study area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Headwall Nano-Hyperspec VNIR imaging sensor mounted on the Matrice 600 Pro. (<b>b</b>) Schematic diagram of the principal plane guiding flight passes of aircraft and UAV during recordings.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>UAV data collection at five dates during the three growth stages of maize. V6~V10 are the sixth-leaf and tenth-leaf stages of maize. VT marks the tasseling stage, and R3 represents the milking stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Distribution of field sampling locations and the respective UAV flight plans.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Flowchart illustrating the creation of the hyperspectral database for maize. In the target pool, different green dots are the EMs of maize, and the yellow dots are the EMs of soybeans. In the background pool, different colors represent different soil types. Liniear mixing spectrum comprise data from both target pool and background pool.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Illustration of the NAOC with an original (green) and a smoothed (orange) hyperspectral reflectance curve of vegetation. The green area corresponds to the AOC, and the blue area is the the integral from 643 nm to 795 nm (<b>b</b>) Diagram of the CAI spectral index. The dark blue area is the the integral from 600 nm to 735 nm, and the brown gray area is the integral of spectral envelope.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Randomly selected intercropping areas of the five UAV hyperspectral recordings. (<b>b</b>) Corresponding results of the NDVI threshold classification, identifying different crop areas: blue = maize; green = soybeans. (<b>c</b>) Spectral characteristics of maize and soybeans measured at the cursor position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Variations of maize spectra with increasing soil background fractions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Number of pixels corresponding to distinct coverage differences based on four spectral matching methods. (<b>b</b>) Distribution of calculated Cosine similarity values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Correlations between the training datasets of measured and retrieved LCCs by the following functional indices: (<b>a</b>) NDVI, (<b>b</b>) CAI, and (<b>c</b>) NAOC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Accuracy of LCC estimation for different growth stages of maize based on our proposed method. (<b>a</b>) Jointing stage. (<b>b</b>) Tasseling stage. (<b>c</b>) Milking stage.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Relationship between LCC and six widely used FVIs: (<b>a</b>) Normalized area over reflectance curve (NAOC); (<b>b</b>) Modified Chlorophyll Absorption Ratio Index (MCARI); (<b>c</b>) Difference Vegetation Index (DVI); (<b>d</b>) Red Edge Chlorophyll Index (CIred-edge); (<b>e</b>) Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (CVI); (<b>f</b>) Soil-adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Linear models were constructed using the full dataset of 60 ground samples from our study area. The correlation coefficients and RMSE values are displayed in each scatterplot, with the distributions of the FVI and LCC values presented as histograms along the top and at the side of each graph.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 7862 KiB  
Article
Vision-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Autonomous Navigation Using Privileged Information
by Junqiao Wang, Zhongliang Yu, Dong Zhou, Jiaqi Shi and Runran Deng
Drones 2024, 8(12), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120782 - 22 Dec 2024
Viewed by 728
Abstract
The capability of UAVs for efficient autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance in complex and unknown environments is critical for applications in agricultural irrigation, disaster relief and logistics. In this paper, we propose the DPRL (Distributed Privileged Reinforcement Learning) navigation algorithm, an end-to-end policy [...] Read more.
The capability of UAVs for efficient autonomous navigation and obstacle avoidance in complex and unknown environments is critical for applications in agricultural irrigation, disaster relief and logistics. In this paper, we propose the DPRL (Distributed Privileged Reinforcement Learning) navigation algorithm, an end-to-end policy designed to address the challenge of high-speed autonomous UAV navigation under partially observable environmental conditions. Our approach combines deep reinforcement learning with privileged learning to overcome the impact of observation data corruption caused by partial observability. We leverage an asymmetric Actor–Critic architecture to provide the agent with privileged information during training, which enhances the model’s perceptual capabilities. Additionally, we present a multi-agent exploration strategy across diverse environments to accelerate experience collection, which in turn expedites model convergence. We conducted extensive simulations across various scenarios, benchmarking our DPRL algorithm against state-of-the-art navigation algorithms. The results consistently demonstrate the superior performance of our algorithm in terms of flight efficiency, robustness and overall success rate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The DPRL framework for UAV navigation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The effect of adding noise to visual perception data. (<b>a</b>) Depth image obtained from the camera in the simulation environment. (<b>b</b>) Salt-and-pepper noise added to the depth image. (<b>c</b>) Gaussian noise added to image (<b>b</b>). (<b>d</b>) Motion blur applied to image (<b>c</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>TD3 framework within the POMDP model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Architecture of the Actor and Critic Network.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulation environment built using UE4 and AirSim. (<b>a</b>) Top-down view of the training environment. (<b>b</b>) Top-down view of Cylindrical Maze, with cylindrical obstacles at random positions and made of random materials. (<b>c</b>) Top-down view of Cubic Maze, with cubic obstacles at random positions and made of random materials. (<b>d</b>) Top-down view of Dense Forest, with trees at random positions and of random types. (<b>e</b>) Top-down view of Mixed Terrain, with obstacles at random positions and of random types. (<b>f</b>) View of the UAV flying within the environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The training curves of different UAV navigation algorithms. (<b>a</b>) SR curve of Proposed DPRL and TD3. (<b>b</b>) AER curve of Proposed DPRL and TD3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison results of navigation and obstacle avoidance trajectories. Each figure represents the evaluation results of 30 episodes, where blue trajectories indicate successful completions and red trajectories represent failures due to collisions. (<b>a</b>) Flight trajectories of DPRL in training environment. (<b>b</b>) Flight trajectories of TD3 in training environment. (<b>c</b>) Flight trajectories of EGO-Planner-v2 in training environment. (<b>d</b>) Flight trajectories of DPRL in Cylindrical Maze. (<b>e</b>) Flight trajectories of TD3 in Cylindrical Maze. (<b>f</b>) Flight trajectories of EGO-Planner-v2 in Cylindrical Maze.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Ablation experiment results for key components of DPRL during model training. (<b>a</b>) SR curves of proposed DPRL, privileged RL and distributed RL. (<b>b</b>) AER curves of proposed DPRL, privileged RL, and distributed RL.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Ablation experiment results for state and action space design in DPRL during model training. (<b>a</b>) SR curve of DPRL with 3D and 4D action space. (<b>b</b>) AER curve of DPRL with 3D and 4D action space.</p>
Full article ">
36 pages, 3468 KiB  
Article
A Smart Contract-Based Algorithm for Offline UAV Task Collaboration: A New Solution for Managing Communication Interruptions
by Linchao Zhang, Lei Hang, Keke Zu and Yi Wang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 781; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120781 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 571
Abstract
Environmental factors and electronic interference often disrupt communication between UAV swarms and ground control centers, requiring UAVs to complete missions autonomously in offline conditions. However, current coordination schemes for UAV swarms heavily depend on ground control, lacking robust mechanisms for offline task allocation [...] Read more.
Environmental factors and electronic interference often disrupt communication between UAV swarms and ground control centers, requiring UAVs to complete missions autonomously in offline conditions. However, current coordination schemes for UAV swarms heavily depend on ground control, lacking robust mechanisms for offline task allocation and coordination, which compromises efficiency and security in disconnected settings. This limitation is especially critical for complex missions, such as rescue or attack operations, underscoring the need for a solution that ensures both mission continuity and communication security. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an offline task-coordination algorithm based on blockchain smart contracts. This algorithm integrates task allocation, resource scheduling, and coordination strategies directly into smart contracts, allowing UAV swarms to autonomously make decisions and coordinate tasks while offline. Experimental simulations confirm that the proposed algorithm effectively coordinates tasks and maintains communication security in offline states, significantly enhancing the swarm’s autonomous performance in complex, dynamic scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drone Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Offline UAV Network Architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Smart Contract Deployment Methods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The Collaborative Process of Autonomous Collaborative Algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Design of the Task Allocation Algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Resource Scheduling Algorithm Process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulation of task allocation algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Resource Scheduling Algorithm Simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Collaborative Decision-Making Algorithm Simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Six Performance Indicators of Collaborative Decision-making Algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Task Completion Rate over Time for Different Node Counts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>NodePower Utilization over Time for Different Counts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Smart Contract Response Time over Time for Different Node Counts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Drone Blockchain Communication Simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>UAV Virtual Simulation Platform Based on AirSim.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Relationship Between Task Completion Rate and Bandwidth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>The Relationship Between Consensus Time and Network Latency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Relationship Between Task Completion Rate and Packet Loss Rate.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Radar Chart Comparing with Other Methods.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 5291 KiB  
Article
Conceptual Design of a Novel Autonomous Water Sampling Wing-in-Ground-Effect (WIGE) UAV and Trajectory Tracking Performance Optimization for Obstacle Avoidance
by Yüksel Eraslan
Drones 2024, 8(12), 780; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120780 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 578
Abstract
As a fundamental part of water management, water sampling treatments have recently been integrated into unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies and offer eco-friendly, cost-effective, and time-saving solutions while reducing the necessity for qualified staff. However, the majority of applications have been conducted with [...] Read more.
As a fundamental part of water management, water sampling treatments have recently been integrated into unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies and offer eco-friendly, cost-effective, and time-saving solutions while reducing the necessity for qualified staff. However, the majority of applications have been conducted with rotary-wing configurations, which lack range and sampling capacity (i.e., payload), leading scientists to search for alternative designs or special configurations to enable more comprehensive water assessments. Hence, in this paper, the conceptual design of a novel long-range and high-capacity WIGE UAV capable of autonomous water sampling is presented in detail. The design process included a vortex lattice solver for aerodynamic investigations, while analytical and empirical methods were used for weight and dimensional estimations. Since the mission involved operation inside maritime traffic, potential obstacle avoidance scenarios were discussed in terms of operational safety, and the aim was for autonomous trajectory tracking performance to be improved by means of a stochastic optimization algorithm. For this purpose, an artificial intelligence-integrated concurrent engineering approach was applied for autonomous control system design and flight altitude determination, simultaneously. During the optimization, the stability and control derivatives of the constituted longitudinal and lateral aircraft dynamic models were predicted via a trained artificial neural network (ANN). The optimization results exhibited an aerodynamic performance enhancement of 3.92%, and a remarkable improvement in trajectory tracking performance for both the fly-over and maneuver obstacle avoidance modes, by 89.9% and 19.66%, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drone Design and Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Conceptual design flowchart to be followed for WIGE-WS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The range of WIGE-WS from the take-off points in Arsuz and Payas.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Water sampling mission profile.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Obstacle avoidance mission profiles: fly-over and maneuver modes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>WIGE-WS grid independence results for cruising flight at <span class="html-italic">h</span>/<span class="html-italic">c</span> = 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>VLM panel distribution on WIGE-WS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Internal- and external-component layout of WIGE-WS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The aerodynamic analysis results for steady-level flight at <span class="html-italic">h</span>/<span class="html-italic">c</span> = 1 at various angles of attack.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>External dimensions and CAD drawing of WIGE-WS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Block diagram of the AFCS.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Block diagram representation of the constructed FNN in MATLAB.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>The block diagram of the optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Variation in longitudinal PID coefficients in the optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Variation in lateral PID coefficients in the optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Variation in ground clearance in the optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Variation in cost variables in the optimization process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Block diagram of the flight simulations, including obstacle avoidance scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Longitudinal and lateral step responses of WIGE-WS AFCS.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 7514 KiB  
Article
Cloud–Edge Collaborative Strategy for Insulator Recognition and Defect Detection Model Using Drone-Captured Images
by Pengpei Gao, Tingting Wu and Chunhe Song
Drones 2024, 8(12), 779; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120779 - 21 Dec 2024
Viewed by 463
Abstract
In modern power systems, drones are increasingly being utilized to monitor the condition of critical power equipment. However, limited computing capacity is a key factor limiting the application of drones. To optimize the computational load on drones, this paper proposes a cloud–edge collaborative [...] Read more.
In modern power systems, drones are increasingly being utilized to monitor the condition of critical power equipment. However, limited computing capacity is a key factor limiting the application of drones. To optimize the computational load on drones, this paper proposes a cloud–edge collaborative intelligence strategy to be applied to insulator identification and defect detection scenarios. Firstly, a low-computation method deployed at the edge is proposed for determing whether insulator strings are present in the captured images. Secondly, an efficient insulator recognition and defect detection method, I-YOLO (Insulator-YOLO), is proposed for cloud deployment. In the neck network, we integrate an I-ECA (Insulator-Enhanced Channel Attention) mechanism based on insulator characteristics to more comprehensively fuse features. In addition, we incorporated the insulator feature cross fusion network (I-FCFN) to enhance the detection of small-sized insulator defects. Experimental results demonstrate that the cloud–edge collaborative intelligence strategy performs exceptionally well in insulator-related tasks. The edge algorithm achieved an accuracy of 97.9% with only 0.7 G FLOPs, meeting the inspection requirements of drones. Meanwhile, the cloud model achieved a mAP50 of 96.2%, accurately detecting insulators and their defects. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Framework diagram of the cloud–edge collaborative intelligence strategy for insulator recognition and defect detection scenarios. Specifically, we designed an insulator coarse recognition algorithm for edge drones and deployed our proposed I-YOLO object detection algorithm on cloud servers.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>H channel of three example images: (<b>a</b>) RGB. (<b>b</b>) Hue. (<b>c</b>) RGB. (<b>d</b>) Hue. (<b>e</b>) RGB. (<b>f</b>) Hue.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Diagram of the I-YOLO Network Structure. The image box on the far left represents the input captured image. The image box on the far right displays the detection results. The dashed box at the bottom represents the basic modules of I-YOLO.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Schematic Diagram of the I-ECA Attention Mechanism. ⊕ represents the elementwise addition, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>σ</mi> </semantics></math> represents the sigmoid activation function, and ⊗ represents the elementwise product.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison of feature cross fusion networks: (<b>a</b>) Traditional FPN structure. (<b>b</b>) Our proposed I-FCFN structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Detailed illustration of the dataset: (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) are images of normal insulators; (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) are images of defective insulators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of Some Data Augmentation Effects: (<b>a</b>–<b>k</b>) are augmented images of normal insulators; (<b>i</b>–<b>v</b>) are augmented images of defective insulators; (<b>i</b>,<b>t</b>) represent rain; (<b>j</b>,<b>u</b>) represent fog; (<b>k</b>,<b>v</b>) represent snow.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Effect of the Coarse Recognition Algorithm for Insulators: (<b>a</b>) RGB. (<b>b</b>) Hue. (<b>c</b>) Combined Image of Otsu Threshold Segmentation Results. (<b>d</b>) Coarse Recognition Result of Insulators.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results of I-YOLO for insulator localization and defect detection: (<b>a</b>,<b>c</b>) show normal insulators; (<b>b</b>,<b>d</b>) display the detection results; (<b>e</b>,<b>g</b>) depict defective insulators; (<b>f</b>,<b>h</b>) present the detection results.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 2214 KiB  
Article
Fault-Tolerant Time-Varying Formation Trajectory Tracking Control for Multi-Agent Systems with Time Delays and Semi-Markov Switching Topologies
by Huangzhi Yu, Kunzhong Miao, Zhiqing He, Hong Zhang and Yifeng Niu
Drones 2024, 8(12), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120778 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 526
Abstract
The fault-tolerant time-varying formation (TVF) trajectory tracking control problem is investigated in this paper for uncertain multi-agent systems (MASs) with external disturbances subject to time delays under semi-Markov switching topologies. Firstly, based on the characteristics of actuator faults, a failure distribution model is [...] Read more.
The fault-tolerant time-varying formation (TVF) trajectory tracking control problem is investigated in this paper for uncertain multi-agent systems (MASs) with external disturbances subject to time delays under semi-Markov switching topologies. Firstly, based on the characteristics of actuator faults, a failure distribution model is established, which can better describe the occurrence of the failures in practice. Secondly, switching the network topologies is assumed to follow a semi-Markov stochastic process that depends on the sojourn time. Subsequently, a novel distributed state-feedback control protocol with time-varying delays is proposed to ensure that the MASs can maintain a desired formation configuration. To reduce the impact of disturbances imposed on the system, the H performance index is introduced to enhance the robustness of the controller. Furthermore, by constructing an advanced Lyapunov–Krasovskii (LK) functional and utilizing the reciprocally convex combination theory, the TVF control problem can be transformed into an asymptotic stability issue, achieving the purpose of decoupling and reducing conservatism. Furthermore, sufficient conditions for system stability are obtained through linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). Eventually, the availability and superiority of the theoretical results are validated by three simulation examples. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drone Communications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Tracking errors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with TVCDs and external disturbances from <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method; (<b>b</b>) Cheng’s method in [<a href="#B11-drones-08-00778" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Curves of formation performance evaluation with TVCDs and external disturbances from <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method; (<b>b</b>) Cheng’s method in [<a href="#B11-drones-08-00778" class="html-bibr">11</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tracking errors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with actuator faults under semi-Markov switching topologies.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Curves of formation performance evaluation with actuator faults under semi-Markov switching topologies. (<b>a</b>) Proposed method; (<b>b</b>) Miao’s method in [<a href="#B29-drones-08-00778" class="html-bibr">29</a>]; (<b>c</b>) Shen’s method in [<a href="#B44-drones-08-00778" class="html-bibr">44</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Topologies structure diagram of MAS (<a href="#FD2-drones-08-00778" class="html-disp-formula">2</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Topologies switching.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Trajectory tracking 3D diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Trajectories on eastern, northern, and vertical position and velocity.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Curves of tracking formation performance.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 12164 KiB  
Article
Heuristic Optimization-Based Trajectory Planning for UAV Swarms in Urban Target Strike Operations
by Chen Fei, Zhuo Lu and Weiwei Jiang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120777 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 546
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms have shown substantial potential to enhance operational efficiency and reduce strike costs, presenting extensive applications in modern urban warfare. However, achieving effective strike performance in complex urban environments remains challenging, particularly when considering three-dimensional obstacles and threat zones [...] Read more.
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms have shown substantial potential to enhance operational efficiency and reduce strike costs, presenting extensive applications in modern urban warfare. However, achieving effective strike performance in complex urban environments remains challenging, particularly when considering three-dimensional obstacles and threat zones simultaneously, which can significantly degrade strike effectiveness. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a target strike strategy using the Electric Eel Foraging Optimization (EEFO) algorithm, a heuristic optimization method designed to ensure precise strikes in complex environments. The problem is formulated with specific constraints, modeling each UAV as an electric eel with random initial positions and velocities. This algorithm simulates the interaction, resting, hunting, and migrating behaviors of electric eels during their foraging process. During the interaction phase, UAVs engage in global exploration through communication and environmental sensing. The resting phase allows UAVs to temporarily hold their positions, preventing premature convergence to local optima. In the hunting phase, the swarm identifies and pursues optimal paths, while in the migration phase the UAVs transition to target areas, avoiding threats and obstacles while seeking safer routes. The algorithm enhances overall optimization capabilities by sharing information among surrounding individuals and promoting group cooperation, effectively planning flight paths and avoiding obstacles for precise strikes. The MATLAB(R2024b) simulation platform is used to compare the performance of five optimization algorithms—SO, SCA, WOA, MFO, and HHO—against the proposed Electric Eel Foraging Optimization (EEFO) algorithm for UAV swarm target strike missions. The experimental results demonstrate that in a sparse undefended environment, EEFO outperforms the other algorithms in terms of trajectory planning efficiency, stability, and minimal trajectory costs while also exhibiting faster convergence rates. In densely defended environments, EEFO not only achieves the optimal target strike trajectory but also shows superior performance in terms of convergence trends and trajectory cost reduction, along with the highest mission completion rate. These results highlight the effectiveness of EEFO in both sparse and complex defended scenarios, making it a promising approach for UAV swarm operations in dynamic urban environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks for 6G)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Three-dimensional configuration space.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic diagram of an urban building.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of ground threats.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flight altitude constraint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Maximum range constraint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Waypoint obstacle avoidance constraint.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Cubic B-spline smoothing curve.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Charts comparing the UAV swarm target strike results in the sparse environment scenario with hostile defense: (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) respectively represent the target strike trajectories of the EEFO, HHO, MFO, SCA, SO, and WOA algorithms in the 3D environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Charts comparing the UAV swarm target strike results in the sparse environment scenario with hostile defense: (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) respectively represent the target strike trajectories of the EEFO, HHO, MFO, SCA, SO, and WOA algorithms in the 2D environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of UAV swarm target strike results in the sparse environment scenario with invincible defense: (<b>a</b>) line chart comparing the optimal fitness values; (<b>b</b>) distribution chart, with bars showing differences in the optimal fitness values; (<b>c</b>) heatmap comparing the optimal fitness values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Charts comparing the UAV swarm target strike results in the dense environment scenario with hostile defense: (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) respectively represent the target strike trajectories of the EEFO, HHO, MFO, SCA, SO, and WOA algorithms in the 3D environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of UAV swarm target strike results in the dense environment scenario with hostile defense: (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) respectively represent the target strike trajectories of the EEFO, HHO, MFO, SCA, SO, and WOA algorithms in the 2D environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Comparison of UAV swarm target strike results in the sparse environment scenario with hostile defense: (<b>a</b>) line chart comparing optimal fitness values; (<b>b</b>) distribution chart with bars representing the difference in optimal fitness values; (<b>c</b>) heatmap chart comparing the optimal fitness values.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 839 KiB  
Article
Coverage Path Planning for UAVs: An Energy-Efficient Method in Convex and Non-Convex Mixed Regions
by Li Wang, Xiaodong Zhuang, Wentao Zhang, Jing Cheng and Tao Zhang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120776 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 497
Abstract
As an important branch of path planning, coverage path planning (CPP) is widely used for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to cover target regions with lower energy consumption. Most current works focus on convex regions, whereas others need pre-decomposition to deal with non-convex or [...] Read more.
As an important branch of path planning, coverage path planning (CPP) is widely used for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to cover target regions with lower energy consumption. Most current works focus on convex regions, whereas others need pre-decomposition to deal with non-convex or mixed regions. Therefore, it is necessary to pursue a concise and efficient method for the latter. This paper proposes a two-stage method named Shrink-Segment by Dynamic Programming (SSDP), which aims to cover mixed regions with limited energy. First, instead of decomposing and then planning, SSDP formulates an optimal path by shrinking the rings for mixed regions. Second, a dynamic programming (DP)-based approach is used to segment the overall path for UAVs in order to meet energy limits. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves less path overlap and lower energy consumption compared to state-of-the-art methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>UAV sensor model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flowchart of SSDP.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An example of incomplete coverage in CASE 3.2: (<b>a</b>) Offset vertices (<b>b</b>) Uncovered area.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cases that may occur in the offset process. (<b>a</b>) Case 1. (<b>b</b>) Case 2. (<b>c</b>) Globally invalid loop generated by case 2. (<b>d</b>) Case 3.1. (<b>e</b>) Case 3.2. (<b>f</b>) Case 3.3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Visual results showing the UAV swarm’s total energy consumption (kJ) for each model with different proportions of non-convex regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Paths generated by each model when the target regions are all of non-convex type.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Visual results showing the UAV swarm’s total energy consumption (kJ) for each model as the number of regions increases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Visual results showing the UAV swarm’s total energy consumption (kJ) for each model as the number of UAVs increases.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Visual results showing the UAV swarm’s total energy consumption (kJ) for each model with different proportions of non-convex regions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The new paths generated by B&amp;F-Avg, B&amp;F-DP, BINPAT, and GASC when the target regions are all of non-convex type.</p>
Full article ">
26 pages, 7657 KiB  
Article
UAV Icing: Aerodynamic Degradation Caused by Intercycle and Runback Ice Shapes on an RG-15 Airfoil
by Joachim Wallisch, Markus Lindner, Øyvind Wiig Petersen, Ingrid Neunaber, Tania Bracchi, R. Jason Hearst and Richard Hann
Drones 2024, 8(12), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120775 - 20 Dec 2024
Viewed by 781
Abstract
Electrothermal de-icing systems are a popular approach to protect unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from the performance degradation caused by in-cloud icing. However, their power and energy requirements must be minimized to make these systems viable for small and medium-sized fixed-wing UAVs. Thermal de-icing [...] Read more.
Electrothermal de-icing systems are a popular approach to protect unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) from the performance degradation caused by in-cloud icing. However, their power and energy requirements must be minimized to make these systems viable for small and medium-sized fixed-wing UAVs. Thermal de-icing systems allow intercycle ice accretions and can result in runback icing. Intercycle and runback ice increase the aircraft’s drag, requiring more engine thrust and energy. This study investigates the aerodynamic influence of intercycle and runback ice on a typical UAV wing. Lift and drag coefficients from a wind tunnel campaign and Ansys FENSAP-ICE simulations are compared. Intercycle ice shapes result in a drag increase of approx. 50% for a realistic cruise angle of attack. While dispersed runback ice increases the drag by 30% compared to the clean wing, a spanwise ice ridge can increase the drag by more than 170%. The results highlight that runback ice can significantly influence the drag coefficient. Therefore, it is important to design the de-icing system and its operation sequence to minimize runback ice. Understanding the need to minimize runback ice helps in designing viable de-icing systems for UAVs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Development in Drones Icing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The experimental and the numerical intercycle ice shape on an RG-15 airfoil with 0.30 m chord length after 4 min of flight at 25 m/s airspeed, 0.44 g/m<sup>3</sup> liquid water content, 24 µm median volumetric diameter, and a static air temperature of −5 °C.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Runback ice after successful de-icing: (<b>a</b>) the runback ice consists of single patches; (<b>b</b>) the runback ice consists of a spanwise ice ridge and frozen rivulets downstream. The flow is coming from the top in both photographs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Experimental test setup: (<b>a</b>) the wing mounted in the wind tunnel; (<b>b</b>) the 3D printed ice shape with the roughness elements added as cuboids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The wing mounted in the wind tunnel with ice shapes added: (<b>a</b>) the intercycle ice shapes; (<b>b</b>) the wooden rods representing spanwise ice ridges.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The simulation grid around the leading edge with an intercycle ice shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Lift and drag coefficients for the clean RG-15 airfoil.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Lift and drag coefficients for the clean wing, an experimentally generated intercycle ice shape, and a numerically generated intercycle ice shape: (<b>a</b>) from wind tunnel tests; (<b>b</b>) from numerical simulations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Lift and drag coefficients for the clean wing and the clean wing with runback roughness: (<b>a</b>) from wind tunnel tests; (<b>b</b>) from numerical simulations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Results for the clean wing with a spanwise ice ridge: (<b>a</b>) lift and drag coefficients from wind tunnel tests; (<b>b</b>) pressure coefficients from numerical simulations of the wing with the spanwise ridge at two different angles of attack (AOAs).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Lift and drag coefficients from wind tunnel experiments for the clean wing, two intercycle ice shapes, and one test with turbulators close to the leading edge.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>The lift and drag coefficients simulated numerically for different airspeeds, once for the clean wing and once for the wing with the experimental intercycle ice shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>The grid sensitivity analysis of the clean wing: (<b>a</b>) for the grid resolution on the surface; (<b>b</b>) for the resolution of the prism layers.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Velocity around the wing at 4° angle of attack: (<b>a</b>) with the experimentally generated intercycle ice shape; (<b>b</b>) with the numerically generated intercycle ice shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure A4
<p>Lift and drag coefficients for wind tunnel tests with intercycle ice shapes with and without additional sandpaper roughness: (<b>a</b>) for the experimental intercycle ice shape; (<b>b</b>) for the numerical intercycle ice shape.</p>
Full article ">Figure A5
<p>Velocity around the airfoil with spanwise ice ridges on the suction and the pressure side: (<b>a</b>) for an angle of attack of 9°; (<b>b</b>) for an angle of attack of 13°.</p>
Full article ">Figure A6
<p>Lift and drag coefficients for the clean wing in the wind tunnel and for different numerical simulation settings.</p>
Full article ">Figure A7
<p>Lift and drag coefficients from wind tunnel tests: (<b>a</b>) three repetitions of the clean wing; (<b>b</b>) the standard deviation of the measurements for the first run with the clean wing.</p>
Full article ">Figure A8
<p>Changes between the clean wing and the wing with runback roughness from the wind tunnel tests, the k-ω-SST model with two different roughness heights, and the Spalart–Almaras turbulence model: (<b>a</b>) the change in lift coefficient; (<b>b</b>) the change in drag coefficient.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 3008 KiB  
Article
How to Enhance Safety of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations in National Airspace Systems
by Dothang Truong, Sang-A Lee and Trong Nguyen
Drones 2024, 8(12), 774; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120774 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 778
Abstract
The rapid growth of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUASs) has raised some safety concerns when sUASs enter the national airspace. As sUASs interact with traditional manned aircraft within this airspace, guaranteeing their safe operations has emerged as a top priority for aviation authorities, [...] Read more.
The rapid growth of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUASs) has raised some safety concerns when sUASs enter the national airspace. As sUASs interact with traditional manned aircraft within this airspace, guaranteeing their safe operations has emerged as a top priority for aviation authorities, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. To address this challenge, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has introduced waiver rules, empowering operators to navigate deviations from specific regulations under well-defined circumstances. Additionally, the FAA developed proposed rulemakings to seek input on how to enhance safety and address risks associated with sUAS operations. The primary question is: How do these current waiver rules and rulemakings align with the Safety Management System (SMS), and what changes are needed for better alignment? The main purpose of this paper is to compare the FAA’s sUAS safety requirements, particularly waiver rules and rulemakings, with the SMS’s safety risk management component to identify alignments and gaps between them. A qualitative data analysis was conducted using three FAA waiver trend analyses and five Notice of Proposed Rulemakings (NPRMs) for sUASs. The results revealed that most sUAS waiver rules and rulemakings sufficiently align with the first three components of the SRM framework (system analysis, identify hazards, and analyze safety risk). However, there are significant gaps in the last two components (assess safety risk and control safety risk). The findings of this study make significant contributions to the sUAS safety management literature. They enable both the FAA and sUAS organizations to promote uniform operational protocols, training initiatives, and risk mitigation approaches tailored to sUAS operations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Node hierarchy, parent nodes, and child nodes of the SRM framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Word cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tree map.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Hierarchy chart.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Comparison diagrams.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 17981 KiB  
Article
Misalignment Tolerance Improvement of a Wireless Power Supply System for Drones Based on Transmitter Design with Multiple Annular-Sector-Shaped Coils
by Han Liu, Dengjie Huang, Lin Wang and Rong Wang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120773 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 454
Abstract
The application of wireless power transfer (WPT) technology in power replenishment for drones can help to solve problems such as the frequent manual plugging and unplugging of cables. A wireless power replenishment system for drones based on the transmitter design with multiple annular-sector-shaped [...] Read more.
The application of wireless power transfer (WPT) technology in power replenishment for drones can help to solve problems such as the frequent manual plugging and unplugging of cables. A wireless power replenishment system for drones based on the transmitter design with multiple annular-sector-shaped coils is proposed in this paper, which improves the misalignment tolerance of couplers, enlarges the drone landing area, and reduces the control requirements of drone landing accuracy further. The general analysis model of the proposed transmitter and the numerical calculation method for mutual inductance between energy transceivers are established. Then, the effect of multiple parameters of the proposed transmitter on the variation in mutual inductance is studied. The misalignment tolerance improvement strategy based on the optimization of multiple parameters of the transmitter is investigated. Finally, an experimental prototype of a wireless power replenishment system for drones based on LCC-S compensation topology is designed to validate the theoretical research. Under the same maximum outer radius of 0.20 m and the same mutual inductance fluctuation rate of 5%, compared to single circular transmitter mode, the maximum offset distance of all directions (360 degrees) in the x-y plane is increased from 0.08 m to 0.12 m. As the receiving side position changes, the maximum receiving power and efficiency are 141.07 W and 93.79%, respectively. At the maximum offset position of 0.12 m, the received power and efficiency are still 132.13 W and 91.25%, respectively. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the wireless power replenishment system for drones.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of common circular magnetic energy couplers on both the ground side and the drone side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Variation characteristics of mutual inductance between the circular transceivers with the variation in drone receiver position.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Variation characteristics of mutual inductance under different turns ratios of the transmitter and drone receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Variation characteristics of mutual inductance under different radii of the transmitter and drone receiver.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram of the proposed transmitter and circular receiver on the drone side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Schematic diagram of the actual winding and approximate winding of the annular-sector-shaped coil unit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Schematic diagram of mutual inductance calculation between the proposed transmitter and the planar spiral receiver on the drone side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Changes in mutual inductance with varying drone receiver horizontal position under different <span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>11</sub> (<b>a</b>) between the annular-sector-shaped coil array and the receiving coil and (<b>b</b>) between the receiving and transmitting sides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Changes in mutual inductance characteristics with varying drone receiver position under different <span class="html-italic">R</span><sub>12</sub> (<b>a</b>) between the annular-sector-shaped coil array and the receiving coil and (<b>b</b>) between the receiving and transmitting sides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Changes in mutual inductance characteristics with varying drone receiver position under different <span class="html-italic">N</span><sub>1</sub> (<b>a</b>) between the annular-sector-shaped coil array and the receiving coil and (<b>b</b>) between the receiving and transmitting sides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Changes in mutual inductance characteristics with varying drone receiver position under different <span class="html-italic">φ</span> (<b>a</b>) between the annular-sector-shaped coil array and the receiving coil and (<b>b</b>) between the receiving and transmitting sides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Changes in mutual inductance characteristics with varying drone receiver position under different <span class="html-italic">θ</span> (<b>a</b>) between the annular-sector-shaped coil array and the receiving coil and (<b>b</b>) between the receiving and transmitting sides.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Flow chart of the misalignment tolerance improvement strategy of the drone receiver horizontal position based on the optimization of multiple parameters of the transmitter.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Characteristic curves of mutual inductance changes corresponding to angle changes at different drone receiver horizontal positions under optimized parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Changes in mutual inductance characteristics between the proposed transmitter and the circular transmitter with varying drone receiver positions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Diagram of the transmitters and drone receiver wound with Litz wires.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Experimental results of mutual inductance varying with the drone position’s horizontal offset distance: (<b>a</b>) forward and reverse series inductances under a single circular transmitter; (<b>b</b>) forward and reverse series inductances under the proposed transmitter; (<b>c</b>) mutual inductance comparison.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Wireless power replenishment system for drones. (<b>a</b>) The experimental prototype. (<b>b</b>) The system topology structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Received power on the drone side and efficiency of the system at different drone receiver horizontal offsets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Experimental waveforms of the voltage and current on the transmitting side and the drone receiving side at different drone receiver horizontal positions: (<b>a</b>) 0 cm, (<b>b</b>) 8 cm, (<b>c</b>) 12 cm, (<b>d</b>) 15 cm.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 3802 KiB  
Article
Performance of Individual Tree Segmentation Algorithms in Forest Ecosystems Using UAV LiDAR Data
by Javier Marcello, María Spínola, Laia Albors, Ferran Marqués, Dionisio Rodríguez-Esparragón and Francisco Eugenio
Drones 2024, 8(12), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120772 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1135
Abstract
Forests are crucial for biodiversity, climate regulation, and hydrological cycles, requiring sustainable management due to threats like deforestation and climate change. Traditional forest monitoring methods are labor-intensive and limited, whereas UAV LiDAR offers detailed three-dimensional data on forest structure and extensive coverage. This [...] Read more.
Forests are crucial for biodiversity, climate regulation, and hydrological cycles, requiring sustainable management due to threats like deforestation and climate change. Traditional forest monitoring methods are labor-intensive and limited, whereas UAV LiDAR offers detailed three-dimensional data on forest structure and extensive coverage. This study primarily assesses individual tree segmentation algorithms in two forest ecosystems with different levels of complexity using high-density LiDAR data captured by the Zenmuse L1 sensor on a DJI Matrice 300RTK platform. The processing methodology for LiDAR data includes preliminary preprocessing steps to create Digital Elevation Models, Digital Surface Models, and Canopy Height Models. A comprehensive evaluation of the most effective techniques for classifying ground points in the LiDAR point cloud and deriving accurate models was performed, concluding that the Triangular Irregular Network method is a suitable choice. Subsequently, the segmentation step is applied to enable the analysis of forests at the individual tree level. Segmentation is crucial for monitoring forest health, estimating biomass, and understanding species composition and diversity. However, the selection of the most appropriate segmentation technique remains a hot research topic with a lack of consensus on the optimal approach and metrics to be employed. Therefore, after the review of the state of the art, a comparative assessment of four common segmentation algorithms (Dalponte2016, Silva2016, Watershed, and Li2012) was conducted. Results demonstrated that the Li2012 algorithm, applied to the normalized 3D point cloud, achieved the best performance with an F1-score of 91% and an IoU of 83%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Drones in Agriculture and Forestry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Map of the protected natural areas of the Canary Islands and photographs of the National Parks of Caldera de Taburiente in La Palma (<b>top left</b>) and Garajonay in La Gomera (<b>bottom left</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Vegetation, true color imagery, and ground truth data for the parks of (<b>a</b>) Caldera de Taburiente and (<b>b</b>) Garajonay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simplified methodology of the individual tree detection and crown delineation using LiDAR data for the extraction of forest parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Selected algorithms to compare the performance of individual tree detection and crown delineation methods (Software implementation is represented by red, blue, and yellow colors and discussed in <a href="#sec3-drones-08-00772" class="html-sec">Section 3</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Color composite and LiDAR data (3D cloud and examples of horizontal and vertical profiles) of: (<b>a</b>) Caldera de Taburiente and (<b>b</b>) Garajonay.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>DEMs generated by the different combinations of ground classification and interpolation algorithms: (<b>a</b>) DEMs and (<b>b</b>) Error Maps (green colors refer to lower errors, while red colors refer to higher errors).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>LiDAR models for Taburiente and Garajonay: (<b>a</b>) DEM, (<b>b</b>) CHM and (<b>c</b>) Normalized point cloud.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Performance evaluation of tree detection algorithms: (<b>a</b>) LMF-LidR, (<b>b</b>) LMF-LIDAR360 and (<b>c</b>) CF.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Reference seeds (red stars) with respect to the seeds detected by the algorithms (black dots): (<b>a</b>) LMF-LidR (ws = 6), (<b>b</b>) LMF-LIDAR360 (<span class="html-italic">σ</span> = 7) and (<b>c</b>) CF (C = 2).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Segmentation results: (<b>a</b>) Reference segmentation (color fill) with respect to the segmentation algorithms (vector overlay), (<b>b</b>) precision, recall, and F1-score and (<b>c</b>) IoU.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Individual tree segmentation for Caldera de Taburiente (<b>left</b>/<b>top</b>) and Garajonay (<b>right</b>/<b>bottom</b>) parks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Forest metrics of Taburiente: (<b>a</b>) height, (<b>b</b>) area, and (<b>c</b>) volume.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Vertical profiles at the Garajonay National Park.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 6743 KiB  
Article
Online Autonomous Motion Control of Communication-Relay UAV with Channel Prediction in Dynamic Urban Environments
by Cancan Tao and Bowen Liu
Drones 2024, 8(12), 771; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120771 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 651
Abstract
In order to improve the network performance of multi-unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) systems in urban environments, this article proposes a novel online autonomous motion-control method for the relay UAV. The problem is solved by jointly considering unknown RF channel parameters, unknown multi-agent mobility, [...] Read more.
In order to improve the network performance of multi-unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) systems in urban environments, this article proposes a novel online autonomous motion-control method for the relay UAV. The problem is solved by jointly considering unknown RF channel parameters, unknown multi-agent mobility, the impact of the environments on channel characteristics, and the unavailable angle-of-arrival (AoA) information of the received signal, making the solution of the problem more practical and comprehensive. The method mainly consists of two parts: wireless channel parameter estimation and optimal relay position search. Considering that in practical applications, the radio frequency (RF) channel parameters in complex urban environments are difficult to obtain in advance and are constantly changing, an estimation algorithm based on Gaussian process learning is proposed for online evaluation of the wireless channel parameters near the current position of the UAV; for the optimal relay position search problem, in order to improve the real-time performance of the method, a line search algorithm and a general gradient-based algorithm are proposed, which are used for point-to-point communication and multi-node communication scenarios, respectively, reducing the two-dimensional search to a one-dimensional search, and the stability proof and convergence conditions of the algorithm are given. Comparative experiments and simulation results under different scenarios show that the proposed motion-control method can drive the UAV to reach or track the optimal relay position and improve the network performance, while demonstrating that it is beneficial to consider the impact of the environments on the channel characteristics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of air-to-ground relay communication scenario in urban environments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Motion control framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of air-to-ground signal propagation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports communication for two stationary UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports communication for two stationary UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports communication for multiple stationary UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports communication for multiple stationary UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports point-to-point communication for two moving UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports point-to-point communication for two moving UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports multi-node communication for multiple moving UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports multi-node communication for multiple moving UGVs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports point-to-point communication for two moving UGVs with unknown channel parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports point-to-point communication for two moving UGVs with unknown channel parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Flight trajectories of the UAV that supports multi-node communication for multiple moving UGVs with unknown channel parameters.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Changes in communication performance when the UAV supports multi-node communication for multiple moving UGVs with unknown channel parameters.</p>
Full article ">
37 pages, 6840 KiB  
Article
Parametric Analysis of Landing Capacity for UAV Fleet Operations with Specific Airspace Structures and Rule-Based Constraints
by Peng Han, Xinyue Yang, Kin Huat Low and Yifei Zhao
Drones 2024, 8(12), 770; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120770 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 964
Abstract
As Urban Air Mobility (UAM) moves toward implementation, managing high-density, high-volume flights in urban airspaces becomes increasingly critical. In such environments, the design of vertiport airspace structures plays a key role in determining how many UAVs can operate safely and efficiently within a [...] Read more.
As Urban Air Mobility (UAM) moves toward implementation, managing high-density, high-volume flights in urban airspaces becomes increasingly critical. In such environments, the design of vertiport airspace structures plays a key role in determining how many UAVs can operate safely and efficiently within a specific airspace. Existing studies have not fully explored the complex interdependencies between airspace structure parameters and fleet operation capacity, particularly regarding how various structural components and their configurations affect UAV fleet performance. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a multi-layered funnel-shaped airspace structure for vertiports, along with an adjustable parameter model to assess factors affecting landing capacity. The proposed design includes the assembly layer, upper layer, lower layer, and approach point, forming the basis for fleet operations, divided into three phases: arrival, approach, and landing. By modeling fleet operations with various constraints and time-based algorithms, simulations have been conducted to analyze the impact of changing airspace structure parametric dimensions on UAV fleet operation capacity. The results reveal that fleet capacity is closely influenced by two limitations: the distance traveled in each phase and the availability of holding points at each layer. These findings provide valuable insights and contribute to future airspace design efforts for UAM vertiports. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Airspace structure and operation factors influencing vertiport operational capacity and efficiency.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Sequential stages of UAV movements from entering the airspace until the end of the landing process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Definitions and parameters for the UAV operation required in this study, including holding points (or stations) in different layers with respective radii and heights.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Number of holding points in different layers associated with the respective radius and safe separation: (<b>a</b>) overall representation of layers; (<b>b</b>) assembly layer and upper layer; (<b>c</b>) lower layer.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Rule-based UAV operation constraints: (<b>a</b>) sequencing constraint; (<b>b</b>) movement constraint; (<b>c</b>) de-conflict constraint; (<b>d</b>) consecutive service constraint. Shaded circles shown in the diagrams represent occupied holding points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Time-based algorithms from phase to phase: (<b>a</b>) flowchart of overall fleet operation according to respective constraints and guidelines; (<b>b</b>) details of “Generating no-conflict movement trajectory” in (<b>a</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Phase-based time slots defined for UAV fleet operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flowchart of self-derived movement for each individual UAV governed by constraints and guidelines in <a href="#sec4-drones-08-00770" class="html-sec">Section 4</a> and according to time-based algorithms in <a href="#sec5-drones-08-00770" class="html-sec">Section 5</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Flowchart to auto-generate the resultant capacity of the fleet operation accomplished by the UAVs involved within a given time duration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Tabulated cases to be simulated for capacity of fleet operations in different upper-lower layer radii (for given heights).</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Fleet operation capacity with different airspace structures: (<b>a</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 50 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 20 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>b</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 40 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 30 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>c</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 35 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 35 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>d</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 30 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 40 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>e</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 20 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 50 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11 Cont.
<p>Fleet operation capacity with different airspace structures: (<b>a</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 50 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 20 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>b</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 40 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 30 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>c</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 35 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 35 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>d</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 30 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 40 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m; (<b>e</b>) illustration of the capacity values for different combinations of upper and lower layers when <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>upr_lwr</sub> = 20 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>lwr_apr</sub> = 50 m, <span class="html-italic">h</span><sub>apr_ldn</sub> = 20 m.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Capacity trends of fusiform structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub> &gt; 0, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> = 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Capacity trends of elongated funnel structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> &gt; 0, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub> = 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Capacity trends of straight-line vertical descent structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> = 0, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub> = 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Capacity trends of inverted conical structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> &lt; <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub>, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> ≠ 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Capacity trends of funnel-shaped structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> &gt; <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub>, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub> ≠ 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Capacity trends of cylindrical structure (<span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>upr</sub> = <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub>, <span class="html-italic">r</span><sub>lwr</sub> ≠ 0) with radii and height variations.</p>
Full article ">
34 pages, 1950 KiB  
Review
Dealing with Multiple Optimization Objectives for UAV Path Planning in Hostile Environments: A Literature Review
by Thomas Quadt, Roy Lindelauf, Mark Voskuijl, Herman Monsuur and Boris Čule
Drones 2024, 8(12), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120769 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 879
Abstract
As Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are becoming crucial in modern warfare, research on autonomous path planning is becoming increasingly important. The conflicting nature of the optimization objectives characterizes path planning as a multi-objective optimization problem. Current research has predominantly focused on developing new [...] Read more.
As Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are becoming crucial in modern warfare, research on autonomous path planning is becoming increasingly important. The conflicting nature of the optimization objectives characterizes path planning as a multi-objective optimization problem. Current research has predominantly focused on developing new optimization algorithms. Although being able to find the mathematical optimum is important, one also needs to ensure this optimum aligns with the decision-maker’s (DM’s) most preferred solution (MPS). In particular, to align these, one needs to handle the DM’s preferences on the relative importance of each optimization objective. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all preference handling techniques employed in the military UAV path planning literature over the last two decades. It shows that most of the literature handles preferences by the overly simplistic method of scalarization via weighted sum. Additionally, the current literature neglects to evaluate the performance (e.g., cognitive validity and modeling accuracy) of the chosen preference handling technique. To aid future researchers handle preferences, we discuss each employed preference handling technique, their implications, advantages, and disadvantages in detail. Finally, we identify several directions for future research, mainly related to aligning the mathematical optimum to the MPS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustrative example of a simplified bi-objective military route planning problem relating the decision variable space to the objective space for two different Pareto-optimal solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Flow chart [<a href="#B18-drones-08-00769" class="html-bibr">18</a>] of the paper selection process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Four different approaches of Preference Handling techniques.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Preference handling classes employed in the literature.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Performance evaluation using preference information.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Geometric interpretation of the Nash Product.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Effect of changing the disagreement point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>a-priori preference handling methods in UAV path planning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Geometric interpretation of the Weighted Sum method on convex and non-convex feasible sets.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Normalization of objective values before weight specification.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Geometric interpretation of the <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ϵ</mi> </semantics></math>-constraint method on a non-convex pareto front.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 19220 KiB  
Article
Map Representation and Navigation Planning for Legged Climbing UGVs in 3D Environments
by Ao Xiang, Chenzhang Gong and Li Fan
Drones 2024, 8(12), 768; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120768 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 527
Abstract
Legged climbing unmanned ground vehicles (LC-UGVs) possess obstacle avoidance and wall transition capabilities, allowing them to move in 3D environments. Existing navigation methods for legged UGVs are only suitable for ground locomotion rather than 3D space. Although some wall transition methods have been [...] Read more.
Legged climbing unmanned ground vehicles (LC-UGVs) possess obstacle avoidance and wall transition capabilities, allowing them to move in 3D environments. Existing navigation methods for legged UGVs are only suitable for ground locomotion rather than 3D space. Although some wall transition methods have been proposed, they are specific to certain legged structures and have not been integrated into the navigation framework in full 3D environments. The planning of collision-free and accessible paths for legged climbing UGVs with any configuration in a 3D environment remains an open problem. This paper proposes a map representation suitable for the navigation planning of LC-UGVs in 3D space, named the Multi-Level Elevation Map (MLEM). Based on this map representation, we propose a universal hierarchical planning architecture. A global planner is applied to rapidly find cross-plane topological paths, and then a local planner and a motion generator based on motion primitives produces accessible paths and continuous motion trajectories. The hierarchical planning architecture equips the LC-UGVs with the ability to transition between different walls, thereby allowing them to navigate through challenging 3D environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The overall framework of the proposed method. The input information consists of RGB images and depth information captured by a depth camera. The RGB images are used to estimate the relative pose, while the depth images are converted into point clouds. The point clouds are first used to extract plane and boundary information, which are then used to construct the proposed MLEM. The numbers 1, 2 indicate the code of the different planes. Based on the MLEM, a universal hierarchical planning framework is used for path planning and motion generation in challenging 3D environments. The outputs of the planning framework are all joint angles trajectories. We use a position controller to control the joints.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The multi-layer elevation map construction pipeline. Based on the plane and boundary information obtained, the point clouds of each plane are used to construct the MLEM. Each plane and its corresponding elevation map are labeled, and the boundary information stores the connection information for different planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The transformation process of two adjacent planes.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Cross-plane path planning and map unfolding process. After the MLEM is constructed and each plane is numbered, a search is conducted in the constructed 3D space map for possible paths from the start plane to the target plane. Based on priority, the planes involved in different paths are unfolded and a path search is conducted until a viable path is found.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The different unfolding results with the same planes in a different order.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The two forms of collision checking. For soft-collision checks, the surrounding grids validation of the foot are checked. A foot is considered supportive when the amount of valid grids around the foothold exceeds a specified threshold. A state is deemed valid only when all six feet are supportive.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The sampling space <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> represents the coordinates on the map and rotation about the z-axis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Boundary motion state. (<b>a</b>). The simplified model and a hexapod prototype. (<b>b</b>) The three independent basic motion patterns. The transition between two adjacent states is realized through a single basic motion.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The convex hull of the foot−valid workspace.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The region transition process between the plane region and boundary region.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The transition between two states is considered as either a translation or a rotation around a certain point.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>(<b>a</b>). The world coordinate system and the body coordinate system. (<b>b</b>). The change of the foot end within the body coordinate system when body posture adjusts.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>(<b>a</b>). The obstacle−free planned path and its simulation scene. (<b>b</b>). The soft−collision check planned path and its simulation scene. Numbers 1–4 represent the sequence of movements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>In the simulation environment, the UGV first walks along the wall boundary and passes through a narrow gap. Numbers 1−16 represent the sequence of movements. It then executes a plane-to-plane transition to move from the ground to the wall. After performing obstacle avoidance maneuvers on the wall, it returns to the ground. This process fully demonstrates the locomotion capabilities of a legged climbing UGV in a complex 3D environment.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>). The red line represents the planned trajectory, while the blue line connecting the scatter points represents the measured trajectory. (<b>b</b>). The absolute motion error over time.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>(<b>1</b>–<b>4</b>) shows that the physical UGV moves along plane boundaries to traverse narrow gaps. (<b>a</b>–<b>d</b>) shows that the UGV conducts the plane-to-plane transition. More experiment and simulation details can be found in the video provided.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The plane transition process under different angles.</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 513 KiB  
Article
Securing Authentication and Detecting Malicious Entities in Drone Missions
by Nicolae Constantinescu, Oana-Adriana Ticleanu and Ioan Daniel Hunyadi
Drones 2024, 8(12), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120767 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 774
Abstract
This study proposes a hierarchical communication framework for drone swarms designed to enhance security and operational efficiency. Leveraging elliptic curve cryptography and space quanta concepts, the model ensures continuous authentication and risk assessment of participating entities. Experimental results demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness in [...] Read more.
This study proposes a hierarchical communication framework for drone swarms designed to enhance security and operational efficiency. Leveraging elliptic curve cryptography and space quanta concepts, the model ensures continuous authentication and risk assessment of participating entities. Experimental results demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness in mitigating security risks, achieving reliable communication even in adverse conditions. Key findings include significant improvement in threat detection accuracy and reduced computational overhead, validating the model’s applicability for real-world drone swarm operations. These contributions establish a robust foundation for secure and resilient drone coordination. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Cryptographic parameter computation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Visualization of communication times and the impact of key establishment and risk factors for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>→</mo> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>α</mi> <mi>i</mi> </msub> <mo>→</mo> <msub> <mi>β</mi> <mi>j</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 1034 KiB  
Article
Distributed Task Allocation for Multiple UAVs Based on Swarm Benefit Optimization
by Yiting Chen, Runfeng Chen, Yuchong Huang, Zehao Xiong and Jie Li
Drones 2024, 8(12), 766; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120766 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 552
Abstract
The auction mechanism stands as a pivotal distributed solution approach for addressing the task allocation problem in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms, with its rapid solution capability well-suited to meet the real-time requirements of aerial mission planning for UAV swarms. Building upon the [...] Read more.
The auction mechanism stands as a pivotal distributed solution approach for addressing the task allocation problem in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms, with its rapid solution capability well-suited to meet the real-time requirements of aerial mission planning for UAV swarms. Building upon the auction mechanism, this paper proposes a distributed task allocation method for multi-UAV grounded in swarm benefits optimization. The method introduces individual benefit variation to quantify the effect of a task on the benefit of a single UAV, thereby enabling direct optimization of swarm benefit through these individual benefit variations. Within the formulated individual benefit calculation, both the spatial distance between tasks and UAVs and the initial task value along with its temporal decay are taken into account, ensuring a thorough and accurate assessment. Additionally, the method incorporates real-time updates of individual benefits for each UAV, reflecting the dynamic state of task benefit fluctuations within the swarm. Monte Carlo simulation experiments demonstrate that, for a swarm size of 16 UAVs and 80 tasks, the proposed method achieves an average swarm benefit improvement of approximately 2% and 4% over the Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (CBBA) and Performance Impact (PI) methods, respectively, thus validating its effectiveness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A clear comparison between the distance-first approach and the benefit-first approach.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The task plan generated by CBBA with 2419 swarm benefit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The task plan generated by PI with 2393 swarm benefit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The task plan generated by BV with 2673 swarm benefit.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Statistical box plots of swarm benefits generated by three distinct methods.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4238 KiB  
Article
A Rule-Based Agent for Unmanned Systems with TDGG and VGD for Online Air Target Intention Recognition
by Li Chen, Jing Yang, Yuzhen Zhou, Yanxiang Ling and Jialong Zhang
Drones 2024, 8(12), 765; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120765 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 501
Abstract
Air target intention recognition (ATIR) is critical for unmanned systems in modern air defense operations. Through the analysis of typical air defense combat scenarios, first, the paper defines the intention space and intention parameters of air units based on military experience and domain [...] Read more.
Air target intention recognition (ATIR) is critical for unmanned systems in modern air defense operations. Through the analysis of typical air defense combat scenarios, first, the paper defines the intention space and intention parameters of air units based on military experience and domain knowledge. Then, a rule-based agent for unmanned systems for online intention recognition is proposed, with no training, no tagging, and no big data support, which is not only for intention recognition and parameter prediction, but also for formation identification of air targets. The most critical point of the agent is the introduction and application of a thermal distribution grid graph (TDGG) and virtual grid dictionary (VGD), where the former is used to identify the formation information of air targets, and the latter is used to optimize the storage space and simplify the access process for the large-scale and real-time combat information. Finally, to have a performance evaluation and application analysis for the algorithm, we carried out a data instance analysis of ATIR for unmanned systems and an air defense warfare simulation experiment based on a Wargame platform; the comparative experiments with the classical k-means, FCNIRM, and the sector-based forward search method verified the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed agent, which characterizes it as a promising tool or baseline model for the battlefield situational awareness tasks of unmanned systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Online intention recognition task setup for unmanned system. The task mainly consists of the following four parts: (1) The input: including our situation information and enemy’s intelligence information; (2) information access: firstly, the adversarial space is divided into grids, then a TDGG is constructed to process situation information, and finally a VGD is generated for situation access; (3) intention recognition: including the formation identification, intention recognition, and parameter prediction; and (4) the output: the inferred intention and intention parameters of all detected enemy air targets are output.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Example of identification process of suspected formation based on the thermal distribution graph. Assuming formation decision threshold <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>f</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>r</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, first, at current time, (<b>a</b>) point <span class="html-italic">A</span> is one of the maximum thermal value points. Since the grid increment of empirical radius <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mi>p</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> for the formation area is taken as 2 (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>), the four air targets [F16-01, F16-02, F16-03, F16-04] in the red square centered on point <span class="html-italic">A</span> form the first suspected formation. Then, save the first group of suspected formation members and update the thermal distribution graph (the members of this group are deleted). And (<b>b</b>) the maximum value point is recorded as <span class="html-italic">A</span> on the new graph; similarly, we can obtain the second suspected formation [F16-05, F16-06, F16-07].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Schematic diagram of flight trajectory and spherical angle solution. If the angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mi>B</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> between <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>A</mi> <mi>B</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> and due north, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mi>C</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> between arc <math display="inline"><semantics> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>B</mi> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mo>^</mo> </mover> </semantics></math> and due north, and the heading angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> at the current time on the sphere are less than the threshold value <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>h</mi> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math>, the aircraft can be considered to be in the direct flight mode.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Clustering results of k-means.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>TDGG of air targets at current time <span class="html-italic">t</span>. The larger the number is, the darker the color is, and the more likely the air targets in the square area <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mo>Δ</mo> <msub> <mi>N</mi> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> are to fight in groups.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The current overall situation with visual information of TDGG and VGD for intention recognition.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Intention recognition results of the model FCNIRM.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Illustration of aircraft J16-04E and S25-03E forward search based on a 60-degree-angle sector.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Recognition of the blue side’s intention—combat support—by the game agent of the red side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Recognition of the blue side’s intention—maneuvering—by the game agent of the red side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Recognition of the blue side’s intention—assemble for standby—by the game agent of the red side.</p>
Full article ">
24 pages, 27332 KiB  
Article
A Global Coverage Path Planning Method for Multi-UAV Maritime Surveillance in Complex Obstacle Environments
by Yiyuan Li, Weiyi Chen, Bing Fu, Zhonghong Wu and Lingjun Hao
Drones 2024, 8(12), 764; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120764 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 668
Abstract
The study of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) coverage path planning is of great significance for ensuring maritime situational awareness and monitoring. In response to the problem of maritime multi-region coverage surveillance in complex obstacle environments, this paper proposes a global path planning method [...] Read more.
The study of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) coverage path planning is of great significance for ensuring maritime situational awareness and monitoring. In response to the problem of maritime multi-region coverage surveillance in complex obstacle environments, this paper proposes a global path planning method capable of simultaneously addressing the multiple traveling salesman problem, coverage path planning problem, and obstacle avoidance problem. Firstly, a multiple traveling salesmen problem–coverage path planning (MTSP-CPP) model with the objective of minimizing the maximum task completion time is constructed. Secondly, a method for calculating obstacle-avoidance path costs based on the Voronoi diagram is proposed, laying the foundation for obtaining the optimal access order. Thirdly, an improved discrete grey wolf optimizer (IDGWO) algorithm integrated with variable neighborhood search (VNS) operations is proposed to perform task assignment for multiple UAVs and achieve workload balancing. Finally, based on dynamic programming, the coverage path points of the area are solved precisely to generate the globally coverage path. Through simulation experiments with scenarios of varying scales, the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method are validated. The experimental results demonstrate that this method can effectively solve MTSP-CPP in complex obstacle environments. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of multi-UAV cooperative maritime visual surveillance mission.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Diagram of threat area modeling.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>An illustration of FOV of a UAV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The overall framework of global path planning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The overall framework of global path planning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Diagram of cross-updating operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Flow of the variable neighborhood search operations.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Diagram of disorder disturbance operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Diagram of swap operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Diagram of insert operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Diagram of reverse operation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of convergence curves of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>s</mi> </semantics></math> under different values of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>u</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Diagram of BFP coverage path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Diagram of BFP coverage path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Comparison of algorithm running time in different simulation scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Simulation results of IDGWO-VNS in four scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of algorithm running time in different simulation scenarios.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Comparison of simulation results of four methods in scenario 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Comparison of simulation results of four methods in scenario 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Comparison of simulation results of four methods in scenario 3.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Comparison of simulation results of four methods in scenario 4.</p>
Full article ">
35 pages, 3827 KiB  
Article
Research on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Emergency Support System and Optimization Method Based on Gaussian Global Seagull Algorithm
by Songyue Han, Mingyu Wang, Junhong Duan, Jialong Zhang and Dongdong Li
Drones 2024, 8(12), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120763 - 17 Dec 2024
Viewed by 692
Abstract
In emergency rescue scenarios, drones can be equipped with different payloads as needed to aid in tasks such as disaster reconnaissance, situational awareness, communication support, and material assistance. However, rescue missions typically face challenges such as limited reconnaissance boundaries, heterogeneous communication networks, complex [...] Read more.
In emergency rescue scenarios, drones can be equipped with different payloads as needed to aid in tasks such as disaster reconnaissance, situational awareness, communication support, and material assistance. However, rescue missions typically face challenges such as limited reconnaissance boundaries, heterogeneous communication networks, complex data fusion, high task latency, and limited equipment endurance. To address these issues, an unmanned emergency support system tailored for emergency rescue scenarios is designed. This system leverages 5G edge computing technology to provide high-speed and flexible network access along with elastic computing power support, reducing the complexity of data fusion across heterogeneous networks. It supports the control and data transmission of drones through the separation of the control plane and the data plane. Furthermore, by applying the Tammer decomposition method to break down the system optimization problem, the Global Learning Seagull Algorithm for Gaussian Mapping (GLSOAG) is proposed to jointly optimize the system’s energy consumption and latency. Through simulation experiments, the GLSOAG demonstrates significant advantages over the Seagull Optimization Algorithm (SOA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Beetle Antennae Search Algorithm (BAS) in terms of convergence speed, optimization accuracy, and stability. The system optimization approach effectively reduces the system’s energy consumption and latency costs. Overall, our work alleviates the pain points faced in rescue scenarios to some extent. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The 5G and mobile edge computing convergence architecture [<a href="#B13-drones-08-00763" class="html-bibr">13</a>,<a href="#B14-drones-08-00763" class="html-bibr">14</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Comparison of performance metrics between 5G and 4G networks.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Logical network architecture of MEC.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Multi-view model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Distributed unmanned intelligence reconnaissance system in emergency rescue scenario.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simplified model of emergency rescue system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Illustration of small-hole imaging reverse learning.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Flowchart of the GLSOAG.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Algorithm effect diagram. In it, subplots F1 to F12 respectively represent the average curve variation effect diagrams of SOA, GLSOA, PSO, and BSA algorithms on test functions F1 to F12, obtained from 30 consecutive rounds of experiments with 200 iterations per round.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9 Cont.
<p>Algorithm effect diagram. In it, subplots F1 to F12 respectively represent the average curve variation effect diagrams of SOA, GLSOA, PSO, and BSA algorithms on test functions F1 to F12, obtained from 30 consecutive rounds of experiments with 200 iterations per round.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Performance comparison of the algorithm on the F6, F8, and F12 test functions.Among them, the bold numbers in the table represent the superior values in each group of experiments.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Performance of the number of tasks under different architectures.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Effect of the number of iterations of different algorithms on the system overhead.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Impact of task volume on system overhead.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1
<p>Algorithm effect diagram (Part 1). Subgraphs F1 to F12 correspond to the convergence effects of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms when run once on test functions F1 to F12, with a maximum of 500 iterations per run.</p>
Full article ">Figure A1 Cont.
<p>Algorithm effect diagram (Part 1). Subgraphs F1 to F12 correspond to the convergence effects of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms when run once on test functions F1 to F12, with a maximum of 500 iterations per run.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2
<p>Algorithm effect diagram (Part 2). Subgraphs F13 to F23 correspond to the convergence effects of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms when run once on test functions F13 to F23, with a maximum of 500 iterations per run.</p>
Full article ">Figure A2 Cont.
<p>Algorithm effect diagram (Part 2). Subgraphs F13 to F23 correspond to the convergence effects of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms when run once on test functions F13 to F23, with a maximum of 500 iterations per run.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3
<p>Graph of test functions F13–F23 and convergence curves. Subgraphs F13 to F23 represent the experimental results of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms on test functions F13 to F23, with a population size set to 30 and a maximum of 200 iterations per run, conducted over 30 consecutive trials.</p>
Full article ">Figure A3 Cont.
<p>Graph of test functions F13–F23 and convergence curves. Subgraphs F13 to F23 represent the experimental results of the SOA, GLSOAG, PSO, and BSA algorithms on test functions F13 to F23, with a population size set to 30 and a maximum of 200 iterations per run, conducted over 30 consecutive trials.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 1503 KiB  
Review
Morphing Quadrotors: Enhancing Versatility and Adaptability in Drone Applications—A Review
by Siyuan Xing, Xuhui Zhang, Jiandong Tian, Chunlei Xie, Zhihong Chen and Jianwei Sun
Drones 2024, 8(12), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120762 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1160
Abstract
The advancement of drone technology has underscored the critical need for adaptability and enhanced functionality in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Morphing quadrotors, capable of dynamically altering their structure during flight, offer a promising solution to extend and optimize the operational capabilities of conventional [...] Read more.
The advancement of drone technology has underscored the critical need for adaptability and enhanced functionality in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Morphing quadrotors, capable of dynamically altering their structure during flight, offer a promising solution to extend and optimize the operational capabilities of conventional drones. This paper presents a comprehensive review of current advancements in morphing quadrotor research, focusing on morphing concept, actuation mechanisms and flight control strategies. We examine various active morphing approaches, including the integration of smart materials and advanced actuators that facilitate real-time structural adjustments to meet diverse mission requirements. Key design considerations—such as structural integrity, weight distribution, and control algorithms—are meticulously analyzed to assess their impact on the performance and reliability of morphing quadrotors. Despite their significant potential, morphing quadrotors face challenges related to increased design complexity, higher energy consumption, and the integration of sophisticated control systems. The discussion on challenges and opportunities highlights the necessity for ongoing advancements in morphing quadrotor technologies, particularly in addressing adaptive control problems associated with highly nonlinear and dynamic morphing aircraft systems, and in the potential integration with smart materials. By synthesizing the latest research and outlining prospective directions, this paper aims to serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners dedicated to advancing the field of morphing quadrotor technologies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>DJI Inspire 3 in (<b>a</b>) camera tilt range extended to +100 degrees when landing gear is lowered; (<b>b</b>) unobstructed pan range when landing gear is raised [<a href="#B21-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">21</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>In-plane morphing via variable-length arms. (<b>a</b>) The off-center scissor structure is designed using angulated elements to create a variable curvature, allowing for a variable-length arm configuration. The scissor-like design enables the arms to contract or extend by altering the angle of its interconnected elements, dynamically changing the quadrotor’s overall size during flight [<a href="#B22-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">22</a>]. In (<b>b</b>), the quadrotor is shown in its expanded state for general flight, while (<b>c</b>) illustrates the contracted state where the ring structure wraps around an object (a doll) to grasp it securely without requiring additional robotic arms [<a href="#B25-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">25</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Top view of the morphing quadrotor UAV at both maximum and minimum configurations, incorporating a reconfigurable frame based on the Sarrus linkage mechanism [<a href="#B24-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">24</a>]. (<b>e</b>) The quadrotor’s arms can fold vertically to facilitate dynamic grasping, emulating the transition of an eagle’s claw from an open to a closed position [<a href="#B26-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Quadrotor with morphofunctional folding capabilities, demonstrating the ability to transition between various configurations to adapt to specific tasks [<a href="#B14-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">14</a>]. (<b>a</b>) H configuration; (<b>b</b>); O configuration (<b>c</b>); T configuration. (<b>d</b>) X-Morf robot’s morphing principle, illustrating a span reduction by decreasing the scissor–joint angle between its arms from 90° to 60°, enabling efficient reconfiguration for varying operational needs [<a href="#B29-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Morphing in-plane through variable arm angles. The morphing quadrotor is shown in (<b>a</b>) the conventional X configuration, (<b>b</b>) the H configuration, and (<b>c</b>) the inverted Y configuration [<a href="#B32-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">32</a>]. (<b>d</b>) Agile robotic fliers [<a href="#B30-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">30</a>]. (<b>e</b>–<b>h</b>) The morphing quadrotor with a 1 kg payload mounted at different positions: (<b>e</b>) at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm; (<b>f</b>) at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm; (<b>g</b>) at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mn>15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm; and (<b>h</b>) at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>15</mn> <msqrt> <mn>2</mn> </msqrt> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>15</mn> <msqrt> <mn>2</mn> </msqrt> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </semantics></math> cm [<a href="#B20-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">20</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Out-of-plane morphing quadrotors. (<b>a</b>) Quadrotor tilting around the frame arm, demonstrating out-of-plane morphing capabilities [<a href="#B34-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">34</a>]; (<b>b</b>) quadrotor tilting along the frame arm, enabling morphing beyond the horizontal plane [<a href="#B35-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">35</a>]; (<b>c</b>) illustration of the two tilting axes for each propeller, showcasing biaxial tilting for hovering in a hyperplane at an arbitrary angle <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>γ</mi> </semantics></math> relative to the horizontal plane [<a href="#B37-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">37</a>]; (<b>d</b>) the hexarotor fully actuated by synchronized tilting (FAST-Hex), a design where six propellers are actively tilted using a single additional servomotor, achieving advanced out-of-plane morphing [<a href="#B39-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">39</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>(<b>a</b>) Hardware components of the prototype, consisting of four links; (<b>b</b>) the multirotor equipped with two-dimensional multi-links, enabling aerial transformation; (<b>c</b>) whole-body aerial manipulation demonstrated by the transformable aerial robot [<a href="#B40-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">40</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The Janus prototype shown in blimp mode detecting balloon failure and transitioning into quadrotor mode [<a href="#B42-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">42</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Overview of the morphing quadrotor design, consisting of 20 links: talon links, middle connectors, outer links, and motor bases. The frame is a symmetrical, closed-loop structure, with the talon link serving as an arm mounted on a rotating base with two rotation axes [<a href="#B26-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">26</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Radial and transverse plane cross-sections of the Soft Pneumatic Actuator (SPA), highlighting the inner structure’s chambers, along with the complete assembly of a quadrotor arm incorporating the SPA [<a href="#B44-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">44</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Magnetic docking mechanism. The top and bottom images show the docking components of the upper arms. (<b>a</b>) The printed circuit board (PCB) and magnets directly attached to the upper arm. (<b>b</b>) The PCB with complementary magnets secured to the upper section of the scissor joint [<a href="#B29-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">29</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Structure of the proposed cc-DRL flight control algorithm for an arm-length-varying quadrotor [<a href="#B69-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">69</a>]. Algorithm 1 illustrates the DRL algorithm used for the offline training of optimal flight control laws for selected representative arm lengths. Algorithm 2 introduces a convex combination method for arbitrary arm lengths, usable online or substituted by an offline pre-trained neural network. Algorithm 3 presents the cc-DRL flight control scheme that receives external length variation commands and updates the combination weights of the trained optimal control laws online to achieve near-optimal flight performance.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of quadrotor trajectories through a narrow gap. The ellipsoids represent the position and attitude of the quadrotor. (<b>a</b>) Schematic diagram (<b>b</b>) Experimental photographs. [<a href="#B19-drones-08-00762" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">
19 pages, 5454 KiB  
Article
Design and Modeling of a High-Peak-Power Distributed Electric Propulsion System for a Super-STOL UAV
by Jia Zong, Zhou Zhou, Jinhong Zhu, Zhuang Shao and Sanya Sun
Drones 2024, 8(12), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120761 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 794
Abstract
Electric short takeoff and landing (eSTOL) aircraft utilize the slipstream generated by distributed propellers to significantly increase the effective lift coefficient and reduce the takeoff and landing distances. By utilizing the blown lift, eSTOL UAVs can achieve similar takeoff and landing site requirements [...] Read more.
Electric short takeoff and landing (eSTOL) aircraft utilize the slipstream generated by distributed propellers to significantly increase the effective lift coefficient and reduce the takeoff and landing distances. By utilizing the blown lift, eSTOL UAVs can achieve similar takeoff and landing site requirements as electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) UAVs, while having lower takeoff and landing energy consumption and thrust requirements. This research proposes a high-peak-power distributed electric propulsion (DEP) system model and overload design method for eSTOL UAVs to further improve the power and thrust of the propulsion system. The model considers motor temperature factors with the throttle input, which is solved through three-round iterative calculations. The experimental and simulation results indicate that the maximum error of the high-peak-power propulsion unit model without considering temperature is 19.52%, and the maximum error when considering temperature is 1.2%. The propulsion unit ground test indicates that the main factors affecting peak power are the duration of peak power and the temperature limit of the motor. Finally, the effectiveness of the propulsion system model is verified through ground tests and UAV flight tests. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>DEP Tandem-Wing UAV model [<a href="#B19-drones-08-00761" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Propulsion Unit model with thrust input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Propulsion unit model with throttle input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Propulsion system model with throttle input.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Overload design process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Propulsion unit test bench.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The experimental data of APC 12X8 propeller.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The experimental data and simulation data of the motor power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The influence of motor temperature on peak power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Motor temperature versus time at different power levels.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The relationship between peak power, motor temperature limit, and duration of peak power.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Propulsion system ground test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>The schematic diagram of the propulsion test system.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>The experimental data and simulation data of the motor power and thrust.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>UAV short takeoff process [<a href="#B19-drones-08-00761" class="html-bibr">19</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>UAV Cable Layout Diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>The UAV power data. (The second high-power phase in the figure is the UAV climb flight test).</p>
Full article ">
28 pages, 2351 KiB  
Article
A 3D Path Planning Algorithm for UAVs Based on an Improved Artificial Potential Field and Bidirectional RRT*
by Yijun Huang, Hao Li, Yi Dai, Gehao Lu and Minglei Duan
Drones 2024, 8(12), 760; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120760 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Efficient and effective path planning can significantly enhance the task execution capabilities of UAVs in complex environments. This paper proposes an improved sampling-based path planning algorithm, Bi-APF-RRT*, which integrates an Artificial Potential Field (APF) method with a newly introduced repulsive coefficient and incorporates [...] Read more.
Efficient and effective path planning can significantly enhance the task execution capabilities of UAVs in complex environments. This paper proposes an improved sampling-based path planning algorithm, Bi-APF-RRT*, which integrates an Artificial Potential Field (APF) method with a newly introduced repulsive coefficient and incorporates dynamic step size adjustments. To further improve path planning performance, the algorithm introduces strategies such as dynamic goal biasing, target switching, and region-based adaptive sampling probability. The improved Bi-APF-RRT* algorithm effectively controls sampling direction and spatial distribution during the path search process, avoiding local optima and significantly improving the success rate and quality of path planning. To validate the performance of the algorithm, this paper conducts a comparative analysis of Bi-APF-RRT* against traditional RRT* in multiple simulation experiments. Quantitative results demonstrate that Bi-APF-RRT* achieves a 59.6% reduction in average computational time (from 5.97 s to 2.41 s), a 20.6% shorter path length (from 691.56 to 549.21), and a lower average path angle (reduced from 33.28° to 29.53°), while maintaining a 100% success rate compared to 95% for RRT*. Additionally, Bi-APF-RRT* reduces the average number of nodes in the search tree by 45.8% (from 381.17 to 206.5), showcasing stronger obstacle avoidance capabilities, faster convergence, and smoother path generation in complex 3D environments. The results highlight the algorithm’s robust adaptability and reliability in UAV path planning. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the Rapidly exploring Random Tree (RRT) Path Planning Process.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Randomly Generated Mountain Peaks in 3D.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the Improved Bi-APF-RRT* Algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of Different RRT Variants for Path Planning. Figure (<b>a</b>) shows the visualization result of Informed-RRT*, Figure (<b>b</b>) shows the visualization result of Bi-RRT*, Figure (<b>c</b>) shows the visualization result of RRT*, and Figure (<b>d</b>) shows the visualization result of Improved Bi-APF-RRT*. In Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), yellow nodes represent tree nodes and red represents the final path. In Figure (<b>d</b>), red nodes represent tree nodes and green represents the final path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Three-Dimensional Terrain Path Planning Comparison of RRT Variants. Figure (<b>a</b>) shows the visualization result of Informed-RRT*, Figure (<b>b</b>) shows the visualization result of Bi-RRT*, Figure (<b>c</b>) shows the visualization result of RRT*, and Figure (<b>d</b>) shows the visualization result of Improved Bi-APF-RRT*. In Figures (<b>a</b>–<b>c</b>), yellow nodes represent tree nodes and red represents the final path. In Figure (<b>d</b>), red nodes represent tree nodes and green represents the final path.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Evaluation of Informed-RRT, Bi-RRT, RRT*, and Improved Bi-APF-RRT* on Key Metrics. Figure (<b>a</b>) shows the comparison of execution times between our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>b</b>) shows the comparison of generated path lengths between our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>c</b>) shows the comparison of the total number of nodes generated during the execution process of our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>d</b>) shows the comparison of the average path angle during the execution process of our algorithm and the comparative algorithms.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Average Performance Metrics of Informed-RRT, Bi-RRT, RRT*, and Improved Bi-APF-RRT*. Figure (<b>a</b>) shows the comparison of average execution times between our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>b</b>) shows the comparison of average path lengths generated by our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>c</b>) shows the comparison of the average number of nodes generated during the execution process of our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>d</b>) shows the comparison of the total average path angles during the execution process of our algorithm and the comparative algorithms. Figure (<b>e</b>) shows the comparison of execution success rates between our algorithm and the comparative algorithms.</p>
Full article ">
22 pages, 4336 KiB  
Article
Optimized Dynamic Deployment of UAVs in Maritime Networks with Route Prediction
by Yanli Xu and Yalan Shi
Drones 2024, 8(12), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120759 - 16 Dec 2024
Viewed by 741
Abstract
The limited coverage of terrestrial base stations and the limited transmission distance and onboard resources of satellite communications make it difficult to ensure the quality of communication services for marine users by relying only on satellites and terrestrial base stations. In contrast, UAVs, [...] Read more.
The limited coverage of terrestrial base stations and the limited transmission distance and onboard resources of satellite communications make it difficult to ensure the quality of communication services for marine users by relying only on satellites and terrestrial base stations. In contrast, UAVs, as flexible mobile communication nodes, have the capacity for dynamic deployment and real-time adjustment. They can effectively make up for the communication blind spots of traditional satellites and ground base stations in the marine environment, especially in the vast and unpredictable marine environment. Considering the mobility of maritime users, one can effectively reduce the communication delay and optimize the deployment scheme of UAVs by predicting their sailing trajectories in advance, thus enhancing the communication service quality. Therefore, this paper proposes a communication coverage model based on mobile user route prediction and a UAV dynamic deployment algorithm (RUDD). It aims to optimize the coverage efficiency of the maritime communication network, minimize the communication delay, and effectively reduce the energy consumption of UAVs. In this algorithm, the RUDD algorithm employs a modified Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to predict the maritime user’s trajectory, utilizing its strengths in processing time-series data to provide accurate predictions. The prediction results are then used to guide the Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) algorithm for the dynamic deployment of UAVs. The PPO algorithm can optimize the deployment strategy in dynamic environments, improve communication coverage, and reduce energy consumption. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can complement the existing satellite and terrestrial networks well in terms of coverage, with a communication coverage rate of more than 95%, which significantly improves the communication quality of marine users in areas far from land and beyond the reach of traditional networks, and enhances network reliability and user experience. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space–Air–Ground Integrated Networks for 6G)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Maritime communication network model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Comparison of trajectories predicted by each algorithm; (<b>b</b>) MLP algorithm trajectory-prediction graph; (<b>c</b>) LSTM algorithm trajectory-prediction graph; (<b>d</b>) SSA-LSTM algorithm trajectory-prediction graph.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Comparison of the trend of prediction error of each algorithm with the number of training rounds.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Comparison of total reward values for different models.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Coverage change graph for different numbers of users.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Comparison of the average latency with different numbers of users.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Comparison of average energy consumption for different numbers of users.</p>
Full article ">
27 pages, 16016 KiB  
Article
Optimization-Assisted Filter for Flow Angle Estimation of SUAV Without Adequate Measurement
by Ziyi Wang, Jie Li, Chang Liu, Yu Yang, Juan Li, Xueyong Wu, Yachao Yang and Bobo Ye
Drones 2024, 8(12), 758; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8120758 - 15 Dec 2024
Viewed by 724
Abstract
The accurate estimation of flow angles is crucial for enhancing flight performance and aircraft safety. Flow angles of fixed-wing small unmanned aerial vehicles (SUAVs) are more vulnerable due to their low airspeed. Current flow angle measurement devices have not been widely implemented in [...] Read more.
The accurate estimation of flow angles is crucial for enhancing flight performance and aircraft safety. Flow angles of fixed-wing small unmanned aerial vehicles (SUAVs) are more vulnerable due to their low airspeed. Current flow angle measurement devices have not been widely implemented in SUAVs due to their substantial cost and size constraints. Moreover, there are no general estimation methods suitable for SUAVs based on their rudimentary sensor suite. This study presents a generalized optimization-assisted filter estimation (OAFE) method for estimating the relative velocity and flow angles of fixed-wing SUAVs based on a standard sensor suite. This OAFE method mainly consists of a cubature Kalman filter and an optimizer. The filter serves as the main loop with which to generate flow angles in real time by fusing the acceleration, angular rate, attitude, and airspeed. Without flow angle measurements, the optimizer generates approximate aerodynamic derivatives, which serve as pseudo-measurements with which to refine the performance of the filter. The results demonstrate that the estimated angle of attack and side slip angle displayed root mean square errors of around 0.11° and 0.24° in the simulation. The feasibility was also verified in field tests. The OAFE method does not require flow angle measurements, the prior acquisition of aerodynamic parameters, or model training, making it suitable for quick deployment on different SUAVs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of coordinates and flow angles (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>D</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>Y</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> are the drag, lateral, and lift forces).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>OAFE method structure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Pseudo-measurements of [<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mo>~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Y</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msub> <mo> </mo> <msub> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mo>~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>] in flight tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The construction of the unknown sequence <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msubsup> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mi> </mrow> <mo>~</mo> </mover> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>r</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msubsup> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> Yellow arrows are unused recursive constructors, while the blue arrows are the direct constructors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Hardware scheme for the simulation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulation framework.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Waypoints for simulation setup.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> in different wind fields.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Comparison of estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>v</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> with the reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Comparison of estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> with the reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Comparison of estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>Y</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with the reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparison of estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> with the reference.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Convergence of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with different initial values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Fixed-wing SUAV for field tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>(<b>a</b>) standard model airplane flight field; and (<b>b</b>) four-side route in flight test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Comparison of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>v</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> results from OAFE with the reference in the flight test.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Comparison of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|"> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> results from the OAFE with the reference in flight tests.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>“Error-<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>” relationship of estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. The orange straight line is a linear fit between the error of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>Estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>Y</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> compared with CFD results.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>Estimated <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> compared with measurements.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>Convergence of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Y</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> with different initial values.</p>
Full article ">
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop