[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Searching for the Reference Point. (2020). Spinu, Vitalie ; Bleichrodt, Han ; Baillon, Aurelien.
In: Management Science.
RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:1:p:93-112.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 40

Citations received by this document

Cites: 88

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Managing anticipation and reference-dependent choice. (2024). Kops, Christopher ; Armouti-Hansen, Jesper.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:112:y:2024:i:c:s0304406824000508.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Study on the moderating effect of social distance on the bonus distribution scheme in online social referrals. (2024). Wang, Kanliang ; Shi, Nan ; Li, Yuhao.
    In: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.
    RePEc:eee:joreco:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Incentive design for reference-dependent preferences. (2024). Gonzalez-Jimenez, Victor.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:221:y:2024:i:c:p:493-518.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Long-term dynamic asset allocation under asymmetric risk preferences. (2024). Pantelous, Athanasios A ; Kallinterakis, Vasileios ; Hwang, Soosung ; Kontosakos, Vasileios E.
    In: European Journal of Operational Research.
    RePEc:eee:ejores:v:312:y:2024:i:2:p:765-782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Testing Models of Complexity Aversion. (2023). Nabil, Nathan ; Georgalos, Konstantinos.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:400814269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Heuristics Unveiled. (2023). Nabil, Nathan ; Georgalos, Konstantinos.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:400814162.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. On the predictions of cumulative prospect theory for third and fourth order risk preferences. (2023). Georgalos, Konstantinos ; Peel, David A ; Paya, Ivan.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:95:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11238-022-09920-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Higher order risk attitudes: new model insights and heterogeneity of preferences. (2023). Peel, David ; Paya, Ivan ; Georgalos, Konstantinos.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:26:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-022-09784-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Risky Sure Things. (2023). Muller-Trede, Johannes ; Markle, Alex ; Rottenstreich, Yuval.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:8:p:4707-4720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Reference Dependence in Intertemporal Preference. (2023). Zhong, Songfa ; Li, Zhihua.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:1:p:475-490.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Prospect theory’s loss aversion is robust to stake size. (2023). Bleichrodt, Han ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04126663.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. You Will not Regret it: On the Practice of Randomized Incentives. (2023). Corgnet, Brice ; Gonzalez, Roberto Hernan.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gat:wpaper:2314.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. All at once! A comprehensive and tractable semi-parametric method to elicit prospect theory components. (2023). Corgnet, Brice ; Zylbersztejn, Adam ; Kpegli, Yao Thibaut.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:104:y:2023:i:c:s0304406822001161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Multi-objective portfolio selection considering expected and total utility. (2023). Li, You ; Ouyang, Yuliang ; Wang, Xianhe ; Teng, Long ; Liu, Shu.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:58:y:2023:i:pd:s1544612323009248.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Are Expectations Misled by Chance? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Financial Analysts. (2022). Franck, Egon ; Flepp, Raphael ; Meier, Pascal Flurin.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:zrh:wpaper:396.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information. (2022). Wu, Tong ; Zhu, Jianjun ; Tan, Xiao.
    In: Group Decision and Negotiation.
    RePEc:spr:grdene:v:31:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-022-09775-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Portfolio choice in the model of expected utility with a safety-first component. (2022). Jansen, Dennis W ; Liu, Liqun.
    In: Decisions in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:spr:decfin:v:45:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10203-021-00347-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The prevention puzzle. (2022). Bleichrodt, Han.
    In: The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review.
    RePEc:pal:genrir:v:47:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1057_s10713-022-00079-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility. (2022). Zank, Horst ; Schmidt, Ulrich.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:65:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-022-09385-w.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A reference point bias in judging cheaters. (2022). Ibanez, Lisette ; Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:89:y:2022:i:c:s0167487022000046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Risk preferences, gender effects and Bayesian econometrics. (2022). Georgalos, Konstantinos ; Alam, Jessica ; Rolls, Harrison.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:202:y:2022:i:c:p:168-183.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Student performance and loss aversion. (2022). Engelmann, Dirk ; Peitz, Martin ; Karle, Heiko.
    In: Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
    RePEc:bla:scandj:v:124:y:2022:i:2:p:420-456.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search. (2021). Schumacher, Terry R ; Stieglitz, Nils ; Srikanth, Kannan ; Billinger, Stephan.
    In: Strategic Management Journal.
    RePEc:bla:stratm:v:42:y:2021:i:2:p:361-385.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. To Pool or Not to Pool? The Effect of Loss Aversion on Queue Configurations. (2021). Huang, Weixiang ; Wang, Dongmei ; Zhou, Wenhui ; Guo, Pengfei.
    In: Production and Operations Management.
    RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:11:p:4258-4272.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. On complementary symmetry and reference dependence. (2020). Woźny, Łukasz ; Lewandowski, Micha ; Wony, Ukasz.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sgh:kaewps:2020059.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters. (2020). Ibanez, Lisette ; Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie.
    In: Economics Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2020-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Explaining satisficing through risk aversion. (2020). Permana, Yudistira.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:89:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11238-020-09767-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. My reference point, not yours. (2020). Buchanan, Joy A.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:171:y:2020:i:c:p:297-311.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters. (2018). Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie ; Ibanez, Lisette.
    In: CEE-M Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpceem:hal-02618665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Reference Point Bias in Judging Cheaters. (2018). Ibanez, Lisette ; Grolleau, Gilles ; Clot, Sophie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:hal-02618665.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui M (2000) Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. 46(11):1497-1512.

  2. Abeler J, Falk A, Goette L, Huffman D (2011) Reference points and effort provision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):470-492.

  3. Allen EJ, Dechow PM, Pope DG, Wu G (2017) Reference-dependent preferences: Evidence from marathon runners. Management Sci. 63(6):1657-1672.

  4. Barber BM, Odean T (2008) All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(2):785-818.

  5. Barberis NC (2013) Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. J. Econom. Perspect. 27(1):173-196.

  6. Bardsley N, Cubitt R, Loomes G, Moffatt P, Starmer C, Sugden R (2010) Experimental Economics: Rethinking the Rules (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  7. Bartling B, Brandes L, Schunk D (2015) Expectations as reference points: Field evidence from professional soccer. Management Sci. 61(11):2646-2661.

  8. Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F (2011) Reference-point formation and updating. Management Sci. 57(3):506-519.

  9. Bell DE (1985) Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 33(1):1-27.

  10. Benartzi S, Previtero A, Thaler RH (2011) Annuitization puzzles. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):143-164.

  11. Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73-92.

  12. Birnbaum MH, Schmidt U (2010) Testing transitivity in choice under risk. Theory Decision 69(4):599-614.

  13. Bleichrodt H, Miyamoto J (2003) A characterization of quality-adjusted life-years under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Oper. Res. 28(1):181-193.

  14. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL (2000) A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. 46(11):1485-1496.

  15. Bleichrodt H, Pinto JL, Wakker PP (2001) Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Sci. 47(11):1498-1514.

  16. Bleichrodt H, Schmidt U (2005) Context- and reference-dependent utility: A generalization of prospect theory. Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Bleichrodt H, Schmidt U, Zank H (2009) Additive utility in prospect theory. Management Sci. 55(5):863-873.

  18. Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A (2012) Salience theory of choice under risk. Quart. J. Econom. 127(3):1243-1285.

  19. Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103-143.

  20. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K (2009) Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1145-1177.

  21. Chew SH, Epstein LG, Segal U (1991) Mixture symmetry and quadratic utility. Econometrica 59(1):139-163.

  22. Chew SH, Epstein LG, Segal U (1994) The projective independence axiom. Econom. Theory 4:189-215.

  23. Cox JC, Sadiraj V, Schmidt U (2015) Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. Experiment. Econom. 18(2):215-250.

  24. Crawford VP, Meng J (2011) New York City cab drivers’ labor supply revisited: Reference-dependent preferences with rational expectations targets for hours and income. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1912-1932.

  25. Cubitt R, Starmer C, Sugden R (1998) On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experiment. Econom. 1(2):115-131.

  26. Delquié P, Cillo A (2006) Disappointment without prior expectation: A unifying perspective on decision under risk. J. Risk Uncertainty 33(3):197-215.

  27. Diecidue E, Van de Ven J (2008) Aspiration level, probability of success and failure, and expected utility. Internat. Econom. Rev. 49(2):683-700.

  28. Eil D, Lien JW (2014) Staying ahead and getting even: Risk attitudes of experienced poker players. Games Econom. Behav. 87:50-69.

  29. Fox CR, Poldrack RA (2014) Prospect theory and the brain. Glimcher P, Fehr E, eds. Handbook of Neuroeconomics, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, New York), 533-567.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Gelfand AE, Smith AF (1990) Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 85(410):398-409.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Genesove D, Mayer CJ (2001) Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1233-1260.

  32. Gill D, Prowse V (2012) A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):469-503.

  33. Gonzalez R, Wu G (1999) On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):129-166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667-686.

  35. Hardie BG, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378-394.

  36. Heath C, Larrick RP, Wu G (1999) Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psych. 38(1):79-109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Heffetz O, List JA (2014) Is the endowment effect an expectations effect? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(5):1396-1422.

  38. Heidhues P, Kőszegi B (2008) Competition and price variation when consumers are loss averse. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1245-1268.

  39. Hershey JC, Schoemaker PJH (1985) Probability vs. certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Sci. 31(10):1213-1231.

  40. Johnson EJ, Goldstein D (2003) Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649):1338-1339.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Köbberling V, Wakker PP (2005) An index of loss aversion. J. Econom. Theory 122(1):119-131.

  42. Köszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133-1166.

  43. Köszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1047-1073.

  44. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking: Fast and Slow (Penguin Books, London).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1975) Value theory: An analysis of choices under risk. Presentation, ISRACON Conference on Public Economics, June, Jerusalem.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263-291.

  47. Kopalle PK, Winer RS (1996) A dynamic model of reference price and expected quality. Marketing Lett. 7(1):41-52.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Kothiyal A, Spinu V, Wakker PP (2014) An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 48(1):1-17.

  49. Lien JW, Zheng J (2015) Deciding when to quit: Reference-dependence over slot machine outcomes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(5):366-370.

  50. Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573-597.

  51. Loomes G, Sugden R (1986) Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(2):271-282.

  52. Luce RD (1959) On the possible psychophysical laws. Psych. Rev. 66(2):81-95.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Machina M (1982) ‘Expected utility’ analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50(2):277-323.

  54. Markowitz HM (1952) The utility of wealth. J. Political Econom. 60(2):151-158.

  55. Masatlioglu Y, Raymond C (2016) A behavioral analysis of stochastic reference dependence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(9):2760-2782.

  56. Meng J, Weng X (2018) Can prospect theory explain the disposition effect? A new perspective on reference points. Management Sci. 64(7):3331-3351.

  57. Murphy RO, ten Brincke RH (2018) Hierarchical maximum likelihood parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory: Improving the reliability of individual risk parameter estimates. Management Sci. 64(1):308-326.

  58. Nilsson H, Rieskamp J, Wagenmakers E (2011) Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory. J. Math. Psych. 55(1):84-93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Odean T (1998) Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance 53(5):1775-1798.

  60. Pope DG, Schweitzer ME (2011) Is Tiger Woods loss averse? persistent bias in the face of experience, competition, and high stakes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(1):129-157.

  61. Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497-528.

  62. Quiggin J (1981) Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian J. Agricultural Econom. 25(2):160-169.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Quiggin J (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(4):323-343.

  64. Rabin M (2000) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68(5):1281-1292.

  65. Rabin M (2013) An approach to incorporating psychology into economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):617-622.

  66. Rosato A, Tymula A (2016) Loss aversion and competition in Vickrey auctions: Money ain't no good. Working paper, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

  67. Rouder JN, Lu J (2005) An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 12(4):573-604.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R (1988) Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertainty 1(1):7-59.

  69. Schmidt U (2003) Reference dependence in cumulative prospect theory. J. Math. Psych. 47(2):122-131.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Schmidt U, Starmer C, Sugden R (2008) Third-generation prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36(3):203-223.

  71. Schneider M, Day R (2018) Target-adjusted utility functions and expected-utility paradoxes. Management Sci. 64(1):271-287.

  72. Starmer C, Sugden R (1991) Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? an experimental investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(4):971-978.

  73. Stott HP (2006) Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie. J. Risk Uncertainty 32(2):101-130.

  74. Sugden R (2003) Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. J. Econom. Theory 111(2):172-191.

  75. Sydnor J (2010) (Over) insuring modest risks. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(4):177-199.

  76. Terzi A, Koedijk K, Noussair CN, Pownall R (2016) Reference point heterogeneity. Frontiers Psych. 7:1-9.

  77. Thaler RH, Benartzi S (2004) Save more tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Political Econom. 112(1):S164-S187.

  78. Toubia O, Johnson E, Evgeniou T, Delquié P (2013) Dynamic experiments for estimating preferences: An adaptive method of eliciting time and risk parameters. Management Sci. 59(3):613-640.

  79. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. Quart. J. Econom. 106(4):1039-1061.

  80. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297-323.

  81. van Osch SMC, Stiggelbout AM (2008) The construction of standard gamble utilities. Health Econom. 17(1):31-40.

  82. van Osch SMC, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM (2006) Exploring the reference point in prospect theory: Gambles for length of life. Medical Decision Making 26(4):338-346.

  83. van Osch SMC, Wakker PP, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM (2004) Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities. Medical Decision Making 24(5):511-517.

  84. Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  85. Wenner LM (2015) Expected prices as reference points—theory and experiments. Eur. Econom. Rev. 75:60-79.

  86. Wilcox NT (2012) Heterogeneity and stability of probability weights. Plenary lecture, Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory conference, July 1, Atlanta.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  87. Winer RS (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):250-256.

  88. Wu G, Gonzalez R (1996) Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. 42(12):1676-1690.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Efficiency of the Experimental Prediction Market: Public Information, Belief Evolution, and Personality Traits. (2021). Yang, Chih-Hwa ; Chie, Bin-Tzong.
    In: Advances in Management and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:spt:admaec:v:11:y:2021:i:4:f:11_4_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Certainty Preference, Random Choice, and Loss Aversion: A Comment on Violence and Risk Preference: Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. (2016). Vieider, Ferdinand.
    In: Economics & Management Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rdg:emxxdp:em-dp2016-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Heterogeneity in risk attitudes across domains: A bivariate random preference approach. (2015). Moffatt, Peter ; conte, anna ; Riddel, Mary .
    In: Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS).
    RePEc:uea:wcbess:15-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Civil Liability, Knight’s Uncertainty and Non-Dictatorial Regulator. (2015). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2015-47.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Ambiguous Beliefs on Damages and Civil Liability Theories. (2013). Mondello, Gerard.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00929948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The ratio bias phenomenon: fact or artifact?. (2011). Villeval, Marie Claire ; Vieider, Ferdinand ; Lefebvre, Mathieu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:4:p:615-641.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting. (2011). pfiffelmann, marie.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:3:p:325-341.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Risk aversion elicitation: reconciling tractability and bias minimization. (2011). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Driouchi, Ahmed ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:71:y:2011:i:1:p:63-80.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Investment in antiviral drugs: a real options approach. (2010). Attema, Arthur ; Lugner, Anna K. ; Feenstra, Talitha L..
    In: Health Economics.
    RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:19:y:2010:i:10:p:1240-1254.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Safety and the Allocation of Costs in Large Accidents. (2010). LANGLAIS, Eric.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:25710.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation. (2010). Vetschera, Rudolf ; Wakolbinger, Lea ; Schwand, Christopher .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:69:y:2010:i:3:p:395-416.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Individual fairness in Harsanyi’s utilitarianism: operationalizing all-inclusive utility. (2010). Trautmann, Stefan.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:4:p:405-415.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. On probabilities and loss aversion. (2010). Zank, Horst.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:3:p:243-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory. (2010). Baucells, Manel ; Villasis, Antonio .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:193-211.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Endowment effects? “Even” with half a million on the table!. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:173-192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Reevaluating evidence on myopic loss aversion: aggregate patterns versus individual choices. (2010). Blavatskyy, Pavlo ; Pogrebna, Ganna.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:68:y:2010:i:1:p:159-171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Separating curvature and elevation: A parametric probability weighting function. (2010). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:41:y:2010:i:1:p:39-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses. (2010). Resende, Jose Lara ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:40:y:2010:i:2:p:109-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. An Empirical Analysis of Choices Between Gambles of Children and Adults in China. (2010). Zhang, Jie ; Peel, David ; Paya, Ivan.
    In: Journal of Gambling Business and Economics.
    RePEc:buc:jgbeco:v:4:y:2010:i:1:p:1-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Coordination after gains and losses: Is prospect theory’s value function predictive for games?. (2010). Schroeder, Andreas ; Krause, Kai Oliver ; Schade, Christian .
    In: Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:huscpw:59524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Distinguishing trust from risk: an anatomy of the investment game. (2009). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel ; Houser, Daniel.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:450.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Preference for Skew in Lotteries: Evidence from the Laboratory. (2009). Santos-Pinto, Luis ; Mata, José ; Astebro, Thomas.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:17165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Previous outcomes and reference dependence: A meta study of repeated investment tasks with and without restricted feedback. (2009). Hopfensitz, Astrid.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:16096.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Is brain activity observable that leads to an evaluation of a probability of 0.5 that is different from 0.5 in binary lottery choices?. (2009). Vogt, Bodo ; Munte, Thomas ; Morgenstern, Ralf ; Heldmann, Marcus .
    In: FEMM Working Papers.
    RePEc:mag:wpaper:09003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence. (2009). Chichilnisky, Graciela ; CHANEL, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:3:p:271-298.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Probability weighting and the ‘level’ and ‘spacing’ of outcomes: An experimental study over losses. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:39:y:2009:i:1:p:45-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Attitudes toward Uncertainty among the Poor: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. (2009). Trautmann, Stefan ; Martinsson, Peter ; Akay, Alpaslan ; Medhin, Haileselassie .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The shape of the utility function under risk in the loss domain and the ruinous losses hypothesis: some experimental results. (2009). ETCHART-VINCENT, Nathalie.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00246.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Eliciting beliefs. (2008). Melkonyan, Tigran ; Chambers, Robert.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:65:y:2008:i:4:p:271-284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. (2008). Llorente, Loreto ; Aizpurua, Josemari.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:64:y:2008:i:2:p:421-446.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. (2008). L'Haridon, Olivier ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Lharidon, Olivier ; Bleichrodt, Han.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:245-266.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Are the Treasures of Game Theory Ambiguous?. (2008). Kelsey, David ; Eichberger, Jürgen.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2007). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: Discussion Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:lmu:muenec:1377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Insights into Trader Behavior: Risk Aversion and Probability Weighting. (2007). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Mattos, Fabio ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Pennings, Joost M. E., .
    In: 2007 Conference, April 16-17, 2007, Chicago, Illinois.
    RePEc:ags:nccsci:37569.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Loss Aversion? Not with Half-a-Million on the Table!. (2006). Pogrebna, Ganna ; Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: IEW - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:iewwpx:274.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Averting risk in the face of large losses: Bernoulli vs. Tversky and Kahneman. (2006). Silvestre, Joaquim ; bosch-domènech, antoni ; Bosch-Domenech, Antoni.
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk. (2006). Cillo, Alessandra ; Delquie, Philippe .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:33:y:2006:i:3:p:197-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. De laversion à lambiguïté aux attitudes face à lambiguïté. Les apports dune perspective psychologique en économie. (2006). Cabantous, Laure .
    In: Revue économique.
    RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_572_0259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. What Drives Strategic Behavior? A Framework to Explain and Predict SMEs Transition to Sustainable Production Systems. (2006). Pennings, Joost ; Garcia, Philip ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Pennings, Joost M. E., ; Kalogeras, Nikos.
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21354.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. (2005). Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05078.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Relationship Between Risk Attitudes and Heuristics in Search Tasks: A Laboratory Experiment. (2005). Winter, Joachim ; Schunk, Daniel.
    In: MEA discussion paper series.
    RePEc:mea:meawpa:05077.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer Choices Under Small Probabilities: Overweighting or Underweighting?. (2005). Chen, Rong ; Jia, Jianmin.
    In: Marketing Letters.
    RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:5-18.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Loss Averse Behavior. (2005). Brooks, Peter ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:31:y:2005:i:3:p:301-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. What is Loss Aversion?. (2005). Schmidt, Ulrich ; Zank, Horst.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:157-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Testing Prospect Theories Using Probability Tradeoff Consistency. (2005). Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Zhang, Jiao ; Wu, George.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:30:y:2005:i:2:p:107-131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes.. (2004). Fontini, Fulvio ; Chateauneuf, Alain ; Basili, Marcello.
    In: Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques.
    RePEc:mse:wpsorb:b04115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Framing and stakes: A survey study of decisions under uncertainty. (2004). Baucells, Manel ; Rata, Cristina.
    In: IESE Research Papers.
    RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty. (2003). Weber, Martin ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed ; Vossman, Frank.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:3756.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Testing Theories of Choice Under Risk: Estimation of Individual Functionals. (2002). Blondel, Serge.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:24:y:2002:i:3:p:251-265.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-additive Capacities. (2002). Grant, Simon ; Eichberger, Jürgen ; Chateauneuf, Alain.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ecl:riceco:2002-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-01 15:48:51 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.