[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 48

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Potential Farmer Adoption of High Available Phosphorus Corn over a Three-year Period. (2015). John , ; Bernard, John C ; Parish, Amy .
    In: African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:afjare:225655.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. ââ Subcellular Biochemistry: Myo-inositol Phosphates, Phosphoinositides, and Signal Transduction L. B.B. Biswas and S. Biswas, eds. New York: Plenum Press, 1996.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. ââ Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2005. Internet site: http://www. de.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/2005/index.html (Accessed July 23, 2009).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. âââ. ââPublic Sentiment about Genetically Modified Food.ââ 2003. Internet site: http:// www.pewtrusts.com (Accessed June 12, 2006). Raboy, V., and P. Gerbasi. ââGenetics of myoinositol phosphate synthesis and accumulation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. ââDelaware 2005 State Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) Sign-Up and Application Information. General Program Description.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. ââNutrient Management.ââ Internet site: http:// dda.delaware.gov/nutrients/index.shtml (Accessed August 16, 2007). Delmarva Poultry Industry, Inc. ââDelmarva Soybeans and Corn Production and Broiler Chicken Useâ2007.ââ Internet site: http://www.dpichicken.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. ââPublic Sentiment about Genetically Modified Food.ââ 2001. Internet site: http://www.pewtrusts.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Ares, G., A. Gimenez, and A. Gambaro. ââConsumer Perceived Healthiness and Willingness To Try Functional Milk Desserts. Influence of Ingredient, Ingredient Name and Heath Claim.ââ Food Quality and Preference 20(2009):50â56. Atkinson, A.C., and A.N. Donev. Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford Statistical Science Series.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Baker, G.A., and T.A. Burnham. ââConsumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26(2001):387â403.

  9. Benbrook, C.M. ââGenetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years.ââ BioTech InfoNet Technical Paper No. 7, 2004.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  10. Bernard, J.C., C. Zhang, and K. Gifford. ââAn Experimental Investigation of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Non-GM Foods When an Organic Option is Present.ââ Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35(2006):374â85.

  11. Bernard, J.C., J.D. Pesek, Jr., and X. Pan. ââConsumer Likelihood to Purchase Chickens with Novel Production Attributes.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 39(2007):581â96.

  12. Bonham, J., D. Bosch, and J. Pease. ââCostEffectiveness of Nutrient Management and Buffers: Comparisons of Two Spatial Scenarios.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38(2006):17â32.

  13. Breneman, and M. Peters. Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture/Economics Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 824, 2003. Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/ PUBLICATIONS/AER824/ (Accessed February 6, 2006).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Center for Food Safety. 2009. ââGE Food.ââ Internet site: http://truefoodnow.org/campaigns/ genetically-engineered-foods/ (Accessed July 27, 2011).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Costa-Font, M., J.M. Gil, and B. Traill. ââConsumer Acceptance, Valuation of and Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods: Review and Implications for Food Policy.ââ Food Policy 33(2008):99â111.

  16. Cox, D.N., G. Evans, and H.J. Lease. ââThe Influence of Information and Beliefs about Technology on the Acceptance of Novel Food Technologies: A Conjoint Study of Farmed Prawn Concepts.ââ Food Quality and Preference 18(2007):813â23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Dumouchel, W.H., and G.J. Duncan. ââUsing Sample Survey Weights in Multiple Regression Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, November Analyses of Stratified Samples.ââ Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(1983):535â43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fernando-Cornejo, J.C., and W.D. McBride. The Adoption of Bionengineered Crops. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Ag Econ Rep. No. 810, 2002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Fields, D., and J.M. Gillespie. ââBeef Producer Preferences and Purchase Decisions for Livestock Price Insurance.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008):789â803.

  20. Green, P.E., and V. Srinivassan. ââConjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice.ââ Journal of Marketing 54(1990):3â19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Greene, W.H. LIMDEP Version 8.0 Econometric Modeling Guide. Plainview, NY: Econometric Software, 2002. Haefele, M.A., and J.B. Loomis. ââImproving the Connection between Theory and Empirical Analysis of Stated Preference and Conjoint Data: Improving Statistical Efficiency and Testing Robustness of Conjoint Marginal Valuations.

  22. Halbrendt, C., J.D. Pesek, A. Parsons, and R. Lindner. ââConsumer Preference for pSTSupplemented Pork.ââ Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(1994):189â202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Halbrendt, C., J.R. Bacon, and J. Pesek. ââWeighted Least Squares Analysis for Conjoint Studies: The Case of Hybrid Striped Bass.ââ Agribusiness 8(1992):187â98.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. Harrison, R.W., and E. Mclennon. ââAnalysis of Consumer Preferences for Biotech Labeling Formats.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004):159â71.

  25. Harrison, R.W., and P.R. Sambidi. ââA Conjoint Analysis of the U.S. Broiler Complex Location Decision.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36(2004):639â55.

  26. Harrison, R.W., T. Stringer, and W. Priyawiwatkul. ââAn Analysis of Consumer Preferences for Value-Added Seafood Producers Derived from Crawfish.ââ Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31(2002):157â70.

  27. Huffman, W.E., J.F. Shogren, M. Rousu, and A. Tegene. ââConsumer Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Food Labels in a Market with Diverse Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(2003):481â502.

  28. Internet site: http://support.sas.com/techsup/ technote/ts722.pdf (Accessed April 29, 2010).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Kaneko, N., and W.S. Chern. ââWillingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Oil, Cornflakes, and Salmon: Evidence from a U.S. Telephone Survey.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 27(2005):701â19.

  30. Koelsch, R. 2003. ââFact Sheet #2: Do I Need an NPDES Permit for My Livestock or Poultry Operation?ââ CAFO Fact Sheet Series. Internet site: http://www.extension.org/mediawiki/files/ 3/3d/02FS_Permit.pdf (Accessed July 7, 2009).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Kuhfeld, W.F. 2009. ââMarketing Research Methods in SAS.ââ SAS Institute Inc., Technical Papers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Long, J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1997.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Louviere, J.J. Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc., 1988.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Lusk, J.L., J. Roosen, and J.A. Fox. ââDemand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.ââ American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2003):16â29.

  35. Lusk, J.L., L.O. House, C. Valli, S.R. Jaeger, M. Moore, J.L. Morrow, and W.B. Traill. ââEffect of Information about the Benefits of Biotechnology on Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: Evidence from Experimental Auctions in the United States, England, and France.ââ European Review of Agriculture Economics 31(2004):179â204.

  36. Maryland Cooperative Extensionâs Nutrient Management Program. ââHow the MCE Nutrient Management Program Got Started.ââ 2006. Internet site: http://www.agnr.umd.edu/users/agron/ nutrient/Bkgrnd/History_ANMP.pdf (Accessed September 20, 2006).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board. ââPoultryâProduction and Value 2006 Summary.ââ Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2007. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/ PoulProdVa/PoulProdVa-04-27-2007_revision.pdf (Accessed April 24, 2008).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Environmental Quality Incentives Program. ââProgram Description.ââ Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2009. Internet site: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs/eqip/index.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Norwood, F., and J. Chvosta. ââPhosphorus-Based Applications of Livestock Manure and the Law of Unintended Consequences.ââ Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(2005):79â 90.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Onyango, B., R.M., Jr. Nayga, and B. Schilling. ââRole of Product Benefits and Potential Risks in Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods.ââ AgBioForum 7(2004):202â11. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology.

  42. Raboy, V., K.A. Young, J.A. Dorsch, and A. Cook. ââGenetics and breeding of seed phosphorus and phytic acid.ââ Journal of Plant Physiology 158(2001):489â97.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Rosett, R.N., and F.D. Nelson. ââEstimation of the Two-Limit Probit Regression Model.ââ Econometrica 43(1975):141â46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. SAS Institute Inc. SAS OnlineDocà 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 2003.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Saylor, W.W. Personal Communication. Monogastric Nutritionist, University of Delaware, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Animal and Food Sciences. May 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Saylor, W.W., J.T. Sims, G.W. Malone, and M.F. Lavahun. ââUse of Phytase and High-Available Phosphorus Corn in Broiler Diets: Impact on Litter Phosphorus Levels and Solubility.ââ 2001 Maryland Nutrition Conference Proceedings, April, 2001.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Smith, D.S., P.A. Moore, Jr., D.M. Miles, B.E. Haggard, and T.C. Daniel. ââDecreasing Phosphorus Runoff Losses from Land Applied Poultry Litter with Dietary Modifications and Alum Addition.ââ Journal of Environmental Quality 33(2004):2210â16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Teisl, M.F., L. Garner, B. Roe, and M.E. Vayda. ââLabeling Genetically Modified Foods: How Do U.S. Consumers Want to See It Done?ââ AgBioForum 6(2003):48â54.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Relationship between cognitive and affective processes, and willingness to pay for pesticide?free and GMO?free labeling. (2022). van Loo, Ellen J ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:53:y:2022:i:3:p:407-421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Attributes?based conjoint analysis of landowner preferences for standing timber insurance. (2021). Yao, Haibo ; Munn, Ian A ; Deng, Yiling.
    In: Risk Management and Insurance Review.
    RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:24:y:2021:i:4:p:421-444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate. (2018). Ton, Jurriaan ; Cameron, Duncan D ; Russell, Jean ; Mallinson, Lucy ; Barker, Margo E ; Horton, Peter.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:10:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s12571-018-0832-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The impact of functional and social value on the price of goods. (2018). Schoors, Koen ; Hoefman, Kevin ; Ryckebusch, Jan ; Bramson, Aaron.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0207075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A Crisis of Consumers’ Trust in Scientists and Influence on Consumer Attitude. (2018). Deng, H ; Hu, R.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:276047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Relevant Purchase Criteria or Basic Requirement: Customer Perspectives on Green Logistics. (2014). , Nikolaus ; Naskrent, Julia ; Klumpp, Matthias.
    In: Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL).
    RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Willingness to Pay for Safer Dairy Product in China: Evidence from Shanghai Customers Purchasing Decision of Bright Dairys Baby Cheese. (2014). Colson, Gregory ; Yan, Yiwei ; Chen, Tinggui .
    In: 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:saea14:162497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. US and German Consumer Preferences for Ground Beef Packaged Under a Modified Atmosphere: Different Regulations, Different Behavior?. (2013). Roosen, Jutta ; Jensen, Helen ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:36018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Consumer Acceptance of a New Traceability Technology: A Discrete Choice Application to Ontario Ginseng. (2013). Boecker, Andreas ; Lilavanichakul, Apichaya .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:159659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Comparing Perceptions of Biotechnology in Fresh versus Processed Foods: A Cross-Cultural Study. (2013). House, Lisa ; Kim, Hyeyoung.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:149733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Explaining organic food choice on the basis of socio-demographics.A study in Portugal and Germany. (2010). Marreiros, Cristina ; Lucas, Maria Raquel ; Rohrich, Kerstin .
    In: CEFAGE-UE Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2010_03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Research: Are We Valuing the Right Stuff?. (2009). Brorsen, B.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:50079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Impact Of Socio-Demographic Factors And Political Perceptions On Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods: An Econometric Investigation. (2009). Targoutzidis, Antonis ; Antonopoulou, Lina ; Papadas, Christos .
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:58062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Is it Who You Ask or How You Ask? Findings of a Meta-Analysis on Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2008). Dannenberg, Astrid.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A stakeholder approach to investigating public perception and attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in Ghana. (2008). Yawson, Robert ; Williams, Irene E. ; Quaye, Wilhemina .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Craig A..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:46559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dimensionen der Verbraucherresonanz bei der Neuproduktbeurteilung von Lebensmitteln. (2008). Menrad, Klaus ; Sparke, K.
    In: Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”.
    RePEc:ags:gewipr:259489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Unobserved heterogeneity in the wine market: an analysis on Sardinian wine via Mixed Logit. (2008). Del Giudice, Teresa ; Pomarici, Eugenio ; Lai, Maria Bonaria.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:aawewp:45502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Consumer Selection of Food‐Safety Information Sources. (2007). Dagevos, Hans ; Frewer, Lynn ; de Jonge, Janneke ; Kornelis, Marcel.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:2:p:327-335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Some Problems in Estimating Willingness to Pay with Contingent Valuation Surveys: Case for Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food. (2007). Kaneko, Naoya ; Chern, Wen S..
    In: 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama.
    RePEc:ags:saeasm:34852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine ; Berrens, Robert.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-06c50003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Market Segmentation Analysis of Preferences for GM Derived Animal Foods in the UK. (2006). KONTOLEON, ANDREAS ; Yabe, Mitsuyasu.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:4:y:2006:i:1:n:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Relative Importance of Preferences for Country-of-Origin in China, France, Niger and the United States. (2006). Tyner, Wallace ; Tanner Ehmke, Mariah ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Identification of Consumer Segments and Its Implication on the Willingness-to-Pay Distribution: The Case of Demand for Non-Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil in the United States. (2006). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Effects of Urban Consumer Perceptions on Attitudes for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. (2005). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2005). Lusk, Jayson ; Kurlander, Lauren ; Jamal, Mustafa ; Roucan, Maud ; Taulman, Lesley.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Who Should Certify the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods?. (2005). Mazzocco, Michael .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8157.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan: Is Positive Discount the Same as Negative Premium?. (2005). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making. (2004). Lusk, Jayson ; Hudson, Darren.
    In: Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:2:p:152-169..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit: Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy. (2004). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Del Giudice, Teresa.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:2:y:2004:i:1:n:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. PUBLIC APPROVAL OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN KOREA: AN ORDERED PROBIT ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN KOREA: FACTOR AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata S. ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: THE ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2004). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food: Relevance of Gene Transfer Technology. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Onyango, Benjamin M..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. (2004). Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K..
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES. (2003). McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Consumer Preferences for Public and Private Sector Certifications for Beef Products in the United States and the United Kingdom. (2003). Ward, Ruby ; Bailey, DeeVon ; Christensen, Bryan J. ; Hunnicutt, Lynn ; von Bailey, Dee.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:34399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer demands for organic and genetically modified foods. (2003). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Rolfe, John ; Donaghy, Peter .
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57862.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World. (2003). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Curtis, Kynda.
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57858.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. MARKET SEGMENTATION WITHIN CONTINGENT VALUATION. (2003). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. UNCOVERING FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD PRODUCTS. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Disaggregating consumer demands for organic and genetically modified foods using the Choice Modelling technique. (2002). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Donaghy, Peter ; Rolfe, John.
    In: 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare02:179524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN NORWAY. (2002). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-26 18:17:34 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.