[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia.
In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 4

Citations received by this document

Cites: 18

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food -- A meta-analysis. (2009). Dannenberg, Astrid.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:68:y:2009:i:8-9:p:2182-2192.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Is it Who You Ask or How You Ask? Findings of a Meta-Analysis on Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2008). Dannenberg, Astrid.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. (2007). Bukenya, James O. ; Wright, Natasha R..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:23:y:2007:i:1:p:117-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2005). Lusk, Jayson ; Kurlander, Lauren ; Jamal, Mustafa ; Roucan, Maud ; Taulman, Lesley.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Baker, G.A. and Burnham, T.A. (2001). Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers. Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics, 26(2), 3 87-403.

  2. Boman, M., G. Bostedt, and B. Kriström (1999). Obtaining Welfare Bounds in DiscreteResponse Valuation Studies: A Non-Parametric Approach. Land Economics, 75(2):28494.

  3. Carson, R.T., L. Wilks and D. Imber (1994). Valuing the Preservation of Australias Kakadu Conservation Zone. Oxford Econom. Papers 46: 727-749.

  4. Clinch, P. and A. Murphy (April 2001). Modeling Winners and Losers in Contingent Valuation of Public Goods: Appropriate Welfare Measures and Econometric Analysis. The Economic Journal 111: 420-443.

  5. Haab, T. and K. McConnell (1997). Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 251-271.

  6. Hanemann, M (1989). Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 71: 1057106 1.

  7. Huang, J., Haab, T.C., and Whitehead, J.C. (2001). Absolute Versus Relative Risk Perception: An Application to Seafood Safety. Working paper: AEDE-WP-0007-01, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University.

  8. Huffman, W.E., Shogren, J.F., Rousu, M., and A. Tegene (2001). The Value to Consumers of GM Food Labels in a Market with Asymmetric Information: Evidence From Experimental Auctions. Paper presented at the annual American Agricultural Economics Association, Chicago, August 5-8.

  9. Huhtala, A (2000). Binary Choice Valuation Studies with Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding the Program Being Valued. Environmental and Resource Economics, 16: 263-279.

  10. Hutchinson, G., R. Scarpa, S. Chilton, and T McCallion (January 2001). Parametric and Non-Parametric Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Forest Recreation in Northern Ireland: A Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Study with Follow-Ups. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(1): 104-122.

  11. Kriström, B. (1997). Spike Models in Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79: 1013-1023.

  12. Kriström, B. (May 1990). A Non-Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Welfare Measures in Discrete Response Valuation Studies. Land Economics, 66: 135-139.

  13. Loureiro, Maria L. and Susan Hine, December 2002. Discovering Niche Markets: A Comparison of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local (Colorado Grown), Organic and GMO-free Products, Journal ofAgricultural and Applied Economics 34(3): 477-487.

  14. Lusk, J.L., Daniel, M.S., Mark, D.R., and Lusk, C.L. (2001). Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nongenetically Modified Corn Chips. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(1), 40-57.

  15. Moon, W. and Balasubramanian, S.K. (2001). Public Perceptions and Willingness-toPay a Premium for Non-GM Foods in the US and UK. AgBioForum~ 4(3&4), 221-23 1. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.agbiofonim~org.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Smith, K.V. and Johnson, F.R. (1998). How Do Risk Perceptions Respond to Information? The Case of Radon. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(1): 1-8.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Transgenic Crops: An Introduction and Resource Guide, Colorado State University Website, Available at: http://www.colostate.edu/prograrns/IifesciencesrfransgenicCrops/ Feldmann, M.P., Morris, M.L., and Hoisington, D. (2000). Why All the Controversy? Choices, 15(1), 8-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Turnbull, B. W., (1976). The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored and Truncated Data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 38: 290-295.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Relationship between cognitive and affective processes, and willingness to pay for pesticide?free and GMO?free labeling. (2022). van Loo, Ellen J ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:53:y:2022:i:3:p:407-421.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Attributes?based conjoint analysis of landowner preferences for standing timber insurance. (2021). Yao, Haibo ; Munn, Ian A ; Deng, Yiling.
    In: Risk Management and Insurance Review.
    RePEc:bla:rmgtin:v:24:y:2021:i:4:p:421-444.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Why rational argument fails the genetic modification (GM) debate. (2018). Ton, Jurriaan ; Cameron, Duncan D ; Russell, Jean ; Mallinson, Lucy ; Barker, Margo E ; Horton, Peter.
    In: Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food.
    RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:10:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s12571-018-0832-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The impact of functional and social value on the price of goods. (2018). Schoors, Koen ; Hoefman, Kevin ; Ryckebusch, Jan ; Bramson, Aaron.
    In: PLOS ONE.
    RePEc:plo:pone00:0207075.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. A Crisis of Consumers’ Trust in Scientists and Influence on Consumer Attitude. (2018). Deng, H ; Hu, R.
    In: 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae18:276047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Relevant Purchase Criteria or Basic Requirement: Customer Perspectives on Green Logistics. (2014). , Nikolaus ; Naskrent, Julia ; Klumpp, Matthias.
    In: Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL).
    RePEc:zbw:hiclch:209207.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Willingness to Pay for Safer Dairy Product in China: Evidence from Shanghai Customers Purchasing Decision of Bright Dairys Baby Cheese. (2014). Colson, Gregory ; Yan, Yiwei ; Chen, Tinggui .
    In: 2014 Annual Meeting, February 1-4, 2014, Dallas, Texas.
    RePEc:ags:saea14:162497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. US and German Consumer Preferences for Ground Beef Packaged Under a Modified Atmosphere: Different Regulations, Different Behavior?. (2013). Roosen, Jutta ; Jensen, Helen ; Grebitus, Carola.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:36018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Consumer Acceptance of a New Traceability Technology: A Discrete Choice Application to Ontario Ginseng. (2013). Boecker, Andreas ; Lilavanichakul, Apichaya .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:159659.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Comparing Perceptions of Biotechnology in Fresh versus Processed Foods: A Cross-Cultural Study. (2013). House, Lisa ; Kim, Hyeyoung.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:149733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Explaining organic food choice on the basis of socio-demographics.A study in Portugal and Germany. (2010). Marreiros, Cristina ; Lucas, Maria Raquel ; Rohrich, Kerstin .
    In: CEFAGE-UE Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2010_03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Research: Are We Valuing the Right Stuff?. (2009). Brorsen, B.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:50079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Impact Of Socio-Demographic Factors And Political Perceptions On Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods: An Econometric Investigation. (2009). Targoutzidis, Antonis ; Antonopoulou, Lina ; Papadas, Christos .
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:58062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Is it Who You Ask or How You Ask? Findings of a Meta-Analysis on Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2008). Dannenberg, Astrid.
    In: ZEW Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:zewdip:7470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A stakeholder approach to investigating public perception and attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in Ghana. (2008). Yawson, Robert ; Williams, Irene E. ; Quaye, Wilhemina .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Craig A..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:46559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Dimensionen der Verbraucherresonanz bei der Neuproduktbeurteilung von Lebensmitteln. (2008). Menrad, Klaus ; Sparke, K.
    In: Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”.
    RePEc:ags:gewipr:259489.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Unobserved heterogeneity in the wine market: an analysis on Sardinian wine via Mixed Logit. (2008). Del Giudice, Teresa ; Pomarici, Eugenio ; Lai, Maria Bonaria.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:aawewp:45502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Consumer Selection of Food‐Safety Information Sources. (2007). Dagevos, Hans ; Frewer, Lynn ; de Jonge, Janneke ; Kornelis, Marcel.
    In: Risk Analysis.
    RePEc:wly:riskan:v:27:y:2007:i:2:p:327-335.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Some Problems in Estimating Willingness to Pay with Contingent Valuation Surveys: Case for Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food. (2007). Kaneko, Naoya ; Chern, Wen S..
    In: 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama.
    RePEc:ags:saeasm:34852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine ; Berrens, Robert.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-06c50003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Market Segmentation Analysis of Preferences for GM Derived Animal Foods in the UK. (2006). KONTOLEON, ANDREAS ; Yabe, Mitsuyasu.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:4:y:2006:i:1:n:8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. The Relative Importance of Preferences for Country-of-Origin in China, France, Niger and the United States. (2006). Tyner, Wallace ; Tanner Ehmke, Mariah ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Identification of Consumer Segments and Its Implication on the Willingness-to-Pay Distribution: The Case of Demand for Non-Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil in the United States. (2006). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. The Effects of Urban Consumer Perceptions on Attitudes for Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. (2005). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27720.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2005). Lusk, Jayson ; Kurlander, Lauren ; Jamal, Mustafa ; Roucan, Maud ; Taulman, Lesley.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Who Should Certify the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods?. (2005). Mazzocco, Michael .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8157.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan: Is Positive Discount the Same as Negative Premium?. (2005). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making. (2004). Lusk, Jayson ; Hudson, Darren.
    In: Review of Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:2:p:152-169..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit: Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy. (2004). Scarpa, Riccardo ; Del Giudice, Teresa.
    In: Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization.
    RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:2:y:2004:i:1:n:7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. PUBLIC APPROVAL OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN KOREA: AN ORDERED PROBIT ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN KOREA: FACTOR AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata S. ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: THE ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2004). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food: Relevance of Gene Transfer Technology. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Onyango, Benjamin M..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. (2004). Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K..
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES. (2003). McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Consumer Preferences for Public and Private Sector Certifications for Beef Products in the United States and the United Kingdom. (2003). Ward, Ruby ; Bailey, DeeVon ; Christensen, Bryan J. ; Hunnicutt, Lynn ; von Bailey, Dee.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:34399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer demands for organic and genetically modified foods. (2003). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Rolfe, John ; Donaghy, Peter .
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57862.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World. (2003). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Curtis, Kynda.
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57858.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. MARKET SEGMENTATION WITHIN CONTINGENT VALUATION. (2003). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. UNCOVERING FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD PRODUCTS. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Disaggregating consumer demands for organic and genetically modified foods using the Choice Modelling technique. (2002). Bennett, Jeffrey ; Donaghy, Peter ; Rolfe, John.
    In: 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare02:179524.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN NORWAY. (2002). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-27 08:22:34 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.