[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
create a website
Consumer Acceptance of a New Traceability Technology: A Discrete Choice Application to Ontario Ginseng. (2013). Boecker, Andreas ; Lilavanichakul, Apichaya .
In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
RePEc:ags:ifaamr:159659.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 42

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. American Journal Agricultural Economics 85(4): 840-856. Lusk, J.L., J. Roosen and J.A. Fox. 2003. Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(1): 16-29.

  2. Baker, G. A. and T.A. Burnham. 2001. Consumer response to genetically modified foods: Market segment analysis and implications for producers and policy makers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26: 387-403.

  3. Ben-Akiva, M. and S.R. Lerman. 1985. Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Biemer, P.P., and S.L. Christ. 2008. Chapter 16 - Constructing the Survey Weights. In Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, edited by P.S. Levy and S. Lemeshow, 4e.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Chrysochou, P., G. Chryssochoidis and O. Kehagia. 2009. “Traceability information carriers.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Enneking, U. 2004. Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: The case of the Q&S label European. Review of Agricultural Economics 31(2): 205–223.

  7. Food Quality and Preference 20(6): 399-409. Dickinson, D.L. and D. Bailey. 2005. Experimental Evidence on willingness-to-pay for Red Meat Traceability in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan.

  8. Gallardo, R.K. 2011. Choice Experiments’ Findings: A Tool for Fruit Agribusiness Managers’ Decision Making. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 14(3): 95110.

  9. Giamalva, J N., W.C. Bailey and M. Redfern. 1997. An Experimental Study in Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay for an Irradiated Meat Product. Journal of Food Safety 17: 193–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Hailu, G., A. Boecker, S. Henson and J. Cranfield. 2009. Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics. Appetite 52: 257–265.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Hayes, D.J., J.A. Fox and J.F. Shogren. 2002. Experts and activists: how information affects the demand for food irradiation. Food Policy 27(2): 185-193.

  12. Hu, W., M.M. Veeman and W.L. Adamowicz. 2005. Labeling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(1): 83-102.

  13. International Journal on Food System Dynamics 3(1): 252-263. Costa-Font, M. and J.M. Gil. 2009. Structural equation modeling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: A cross country study.

  14. Johnson, F.R., E. Lancsar, D.Marshall, V. Kilambi, A. Muehlbacher, D.A.Regier, B.W. Bresnahan, B. Kanninen, J.F.P.Bridges. 2013. Constructing Experimental Designs for Discrete-Choice Experiments: Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value in Health16: 3-13.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 37(3): 537-548. Elrod, T., J.J. Louviere, and K.S. Davey. 1992. “An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models.” Journal of Marketing Research 29(3): 368-377.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Kerr, G.N., and B.M.H. Sharp. 2010. Choice experiment adaptive design benefits: a case study.

  17. Lancaster, K.J. 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132-157.

  18. Lindner, J.R., T.H. Murphy and G.E. Briers. 2001. Handling Non-response in Social Science Research. Journal of Agricultural Education 42(4): 43-53.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Louviere, J., D. Hensher and J. Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods: Analysis and application.

  20. Low, N., A. Boecker, R. Hanner and J. Hobbs. 2009. The Traceability and Authenticity of Foods from Analytical and Consumer Perspectives. Project Progress Presentation at the 2009 5th Annual AFMNet Conference, Guelph, June 11-14, 2009.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  21. Lusk, J. L. 2003. Effect of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice.

  22. Lusk, J.L., M. Moore, L.O. House, and B. Morrow. 2002. Influence of Brand Name and Type of Modification on Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Engineered Corn Chips: A Preliminary Analysis. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(4): 373-383.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Lyndhurst, B. 2009. An Evidence Review of Public Attitudes to Emerging Food Technologies. A report carried out on behalf of the Social Science Research Unit, Food Standards Agency.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  24. MacDonald, C. and M. Whellams. 2007. Corporate decisions about labeling genetically modified foods. Journal of Business Ethics 75(2): 181-189.

  25. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Nayga, R.M., R. Woodward and W. Aiew. 2006. Willingness to Pay for Reduced Risk of Foodborne Illness: A Nonhypothetical Field Experiment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 54: 461–475.

  27. New Zealand. Available online [accessed September 2013]: http://www.esr.cri.nz/SiteCollectionDocuments/ESR/PDF/SocialScience/emergingfoodte chsummary.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Olsen, N.V., K.G. Grunert, and A.M. Sonne. 2010. Consumer Acceptance of High-Pressure Processing and Pulsed-Electric Field: A Review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 21(9): 464-472.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Orme, B. 2010. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Second Edition, Madison, WI.: Research Publishers LLC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Ortega, D.L., H.H. Wang, L. Wu, and N.J. Olynk. 2011. Modeling Heterogeneity in Consumer Preferences for Select Food Safety Attributes in China. Food Policy 36(2): 318-324.

  31. Rose, J.M. 2011. Sample size, statistical power and discrete choice experiments: How much is enough? Presentation at Design of Experiments in Healthcare Workshop, University of Cambridge, UK. August 15-19, 2011. Slides and video available online: http://www.newton.ac.uk/programmes/DAE/daew03p.html.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Rose, J.M., and M.C.J. Bliemer. 2013. Sample size requirements for stated choice experiments.

  33. Singh, S.R., and M.A.H. Levine. 2006. Natural Health Product Use in Canada: Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 13(2): e240-e250.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Spink, J., and D.C. Moyer. 2011. Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud. Journal of Food Science 76: R157–R163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. StataCorp, LP. 2009. Stata Survey Data Reference Manual, Release 11, College Station Texas: Stata Press Publication.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Statistics Canada. 2006. 2006 Census report. Online: http://www12.statcan.ca/.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Teisl, M.F., and B.E. Roe. 2010. Consumer Willingness-to-Pay to Reduce the Probability of Retail Foodborne Pathogen Contamination. Food Policy 35(6): 521-530.

  38. The technology backgrounds and consumers’ perceptions of the technological solutions.” Appetite 53(3): 322-331. Cicia, G. and F. Colantuoni. 2010. Willingness to pay for traceable meat attributes: a metaanalysis.

  39. Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  40. Transportation 40: 1021-1041. Shogren, J.F., J.A. Fox, D.J. Hayes and J. Roosen. 1999. Observed choices for food safety in retail, survey, and auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5): 1192-1199.

  41. Ubilava, D., and K. Foster. 2009. Quality Certification vs. Product Traceability: Consumer Preferences for Informational Attributes of Pork in Georgia. Food Policy 34(3): 305-310.

  42. Verbeke, W. and J. Roosen. 2009. Market differentiation potential of country-of-origin, quality and traceability labeling. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy 10(1): 20-35.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Chinese consumers’ willingness to pay for pork traceability information—the case of Wuxi. (2016). Hu, Wuyang ; Zhu, Dian ; Wang, Hongsha ; Wu, Linhai.
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:47:y:2016:i:1:p:71-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Willingness-to-Pay for an Educational Label: The Zamorano University Brand. (2016). Segovia, Michelle ; Palma, Marco ; Michelle, Segovia ; Arias, Fredi ; Rajo, Lindelly A ; Marco, Palma .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:230836.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Chinese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food quality and safety attributes: The case of pork. (2015). Hu, Wuyang ; Wang, Hongsha ; Zhu, Dian ; Wu, Linhai.
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:35:y:2015:i:c:p:121-136.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. (2014). Verbeke, Wim ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Chryssochoidis, George ; Caputo, Vincenzina ; Van Wezemael, Lynn .
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:44:y:2014:i:c:p:167-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Analysing farmers use of price hedging instruments: an experimental approach. (2013). Musshoff, Oliver ; Anastassiadis, Friederieke ; Schilling, Philipp ; Feil, Jan-Henning .
    In: DARE Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:daredp:1306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Farmer preferences for drought tolerance in hybrid versus inbred rice: Evidence from Bihar, India:. (2013). Ward, Patrick ; Spielman, David ; Ortega, David L. ; Singh, Vartika .
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. (2013). Yue, Chengyan ; Zhao, LI ; Gu, Haiying ; Ahlstrom, David.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:42:y:2013:i:c:p:58-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. New Age, New Learners, New Skills: What Skills Do Agribusiness Graduates Need to Succeed in the Knowledge Economy?. (2013). Qenani, Eivis ; Noel, Jay .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:156423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Do Parents Benefit from School Health Risk Reduction?. (2013). Mahasuweerachai, Phumsith.
    In: Applied Economics Journal.
    RePEc:aej:apecjn:v:20:y:2013:i:2:p:75-95.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. What nutrition label to use in a catering environment? A discrete choice experiment. (2012). Verbeke, Wim ; Chellattan Veettil, Prakashan ; Hoefkens, Christine ; Van Camp, John ; van Huylenbroeck, Guido.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:37:y:2012:i:6:p:741-750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Using best–worst scaling to explore perceptions of relative responsibility for ensuring food safety. (2012). Wossink, Ada ; Rigby, Dan ; Erdem, Seda.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:37:y:2012:i:6:p:661-670.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Consumer valuation of health attributes for soy-based food: A choice modeling approach. (2012). Chang, Jaebong ; Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K..
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:37:y:2012:i:3:p:335-342.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Willingness-to-Pay for Calf Health Programs and Certification Agents. (2012). Tonsor, Glynn ; Schroeder, Ted ; Schumacher, Tucker .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:123777.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A Comparison Of Choice Experiments And Actual Grocery Store Behavior: An Empirical Application To Seafood Products. (2012). Hudson, Darren ; Gallardo, R. Karina ; Hanson, Terrill .
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:120453.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Consumers’ willingness to pay for a functional food. (2012). Veneziani, Mario ; Sckokai, Paolo ; Moro, Daniele.
    In: 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:aieacp:124101.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Consumers’ Willingness-to-pay for Organic and Local Blueberries: A Multi-store BDM Auction Controlling for Purchase Intentions. (2012). Gao, Zhifeng ; House, Lisa A. ; Shi, Lijia .
    In: 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
    RePEc:ags:aaea12:124998.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Undergraduate Students’ Preferences and Willingness to Pay for College Course Attributes. (2012). Mann, John ; Henneberry, Shida R..
    In: 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
    RePEc:ags:aaea12:124946.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. New Age, New Learners, New Skills: What Skills Do Graduates Need to Succeed in the New Economy?. (2012). Noel, Jay E. ; Qenani, Eivis .
    In: 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington.
    RePEc:ags:aaea12:123948.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Willingness-to-pay in terms of price: an application to organic beef during and after the “mad cow” crisis. (2011). Corsi, Alessandro ; Novelli, Silvia.
    In: Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement.
    RePEc:rae:jourae:v:92:y:2011:i:1:p:25-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Farmer demand for financial record-keeping system attributes. (2011). Wolf, Christopher ; Lupi, Frank ; Harsh, Stephen .
    In: Agricultural Finance Review.
    RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:71:y:2011:i:2:p:259-276.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China. (2011). Wu, Laping ; Widmar, Nicole ; Wang, H. Holly ; Ortega, David ; Olynk, Nicole J..
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:36:y:2011:i:2:p:318-324.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Understanding U.S. Consumer Demand for Milk Production Attributes. (2011). Wolf, Christopher ; Widmar, Nicole ; Tonsor, Glynn ; Olynk, Nicole J..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:117186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Consumers’ willingness to pay for biodiesel in Spain. (2011). Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, Azucena ; Perez y Perez, Luis, ; Perez y Perez, Luis, ; Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus.
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Consumer risk perceptions of zoonotic, chemical and gm risks: the case of poultry purchase intentions in Finland. (2011). Heikkilä, Jaakko ; Pouta, Eija ; Forsman-Hugg, Sari ; Makela, Johanna ; Heikkila, Jaakko .
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114551.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. USING BEST WORST SCALING TO INVESTIGATE PERCEPTIONS OF CONTROL & CONCERN OVER FOOD AND NON-FOOD RISKS. (2011). Rigby, Dan ; Erdem, Seda.
    In: 85th Annual Conference, April 18-20, 2011, Warwick University, Coventry, UK.
    RePEc:ags:aesc11:108790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How safe is my food?: Assessing the effect of information and credible certification on consumer demand for food safety in developing countries. (2010). Torero, Maximo ; Roy, Devesh ; Birol, Ekin.
    In: IFPRI discussion papers.
    RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1029.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Do Americans want ethanol? A comparative contingent-valuation study of willingness to pay for E-10 and E-85. (2010). Petrolia, Daniel ; Hudson, Darren ; Bhattacharjee, Sanjoy ; Herndon, Cary W..
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:121-128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. THE INFLUENCE OF ATTRIBUTE CUTOFFS ON CONSUMERS’ CHOICES OF A FUNCTIONAL FOOD. (2010). Adamowicz, Wiktor ; Veeman, Michele M. ; Ding, Yulian .
    In: 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
    RePEc:ags:eaa115:116423.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A Cost-Benefit Framework for the Assessment of Non-Tariff Measures in Agro-Food Trade. (2009). van Tongeren, Frank ; marette, stéphan ; Beghin, John.
    In: Staff General Research Papers Archive.
    RePEc:isu:genres:13146.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Quality certification vs. product traceability: Consumer preferences for informational attributes of pork in Georgia. (2009). Ubilava, David ; Foster, Kenneth.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:34:y:2009:i:3:p:305-310.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Keine Chance für genetisch veränderte Lebensmittel in Deutschland? Eine experimentelle Analyse von Zahlungsbereitschaften. (2009). Scatasta, Sara ; Dannenberg, Astrid ; Sturm, Bodo.
    In: Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik.
    RePEc:bla:perwir:v:10:y:2009:i:2:p:214-234.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Developing country consumers’ demand for food safety and quality: Is Mumbai ready for certified and organic fruits?. (2009). Roy, Devesh ; Birol, Ekin ; Karandikar, Bhushana ; Deffner, Katharina .
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:51689.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. A non-compensatory choice modeling analysis of Japanese consumers’ preferences for beef: A choice experiment approach. (2009). Aizaki, Hideo ; Kikkawa, Toshiko ; Sawada, Manabu ; Sato, Kazuo.
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:51656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Understanding Market potential for biodiesel in Spain: A Pilot study based on consumer preferences. (2009). Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús ; Gracia, Azucena ; Perez y Perez, Luis, ; Perez y Perez, Luis, ; Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus.
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:50329.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Consumers’ Stated Choices versus Purchasing Desires: Case of Hawaii Food Baskets. (2009). Hu, Wuyang ; Cox, Linda.
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:56632.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. (2008). Traill, William ; Costa-Font, Montserrat ; Gil, Jose M..
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:33:y:2008:i:2:p:99-111.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Public willingness to pay for environmental management, risk reduction and economic development: Evidence from Tianjin, China. (2008). Zhai, Guofang ; Suzuki, Takeshi .
    In: China Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:chieco:v:19:y:2008:i:4:p:551-566.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Consumer Preferences in Purchasing Beef and the Values they Attribute to Branded Beef Products. (2008). Wilmeth, Doug ; Rhoades, Ryan ; Hanagriff, Roger .
    In: 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia.
    RePEc:ags:saeana:46854.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. (2007). Umberger, Wendy ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Food Policy.
    RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:32:y:2007:i:4:p:496-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Consumer Demand for Quality: Major Determinant for Agricultural and Food Trade in the Future?. (2007). Caswell, Julie ; Joseph, Siny .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:dre:wpaper:2007-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Consumer Demand for Quality: Major Determinant for Agricultural and Food Trade in the Future?. (2007). Caswell, Julie ; Joseph, Siny .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:uconnr:149196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. (2006). Koundouri, Phoebe ; Birol, Ekin ; Karousakis, Katia.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:60:y:2006:i:1:p:145-156.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Grimsrud, Kristine M. ; Mittelhammer, Ron C..
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2006:i:23:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine ; Berrens, Robert.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-06c50003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. An Empirical Analysis of United States Consumers Concerns about Eight Food Production and Processing Technologies. (2005). Roe, Brian ; Hwang, Yun-Jae ; Teisl, Mario F..
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Experimental auction procedure: Impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods. (2004). Schroeder, Ted ; Lusk, Jayson ; Feldkamp, T.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00097.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. GM food technology abroad and its implications for Australia and New Zealand. (2004). Anderson, Kym ; Jackson, Lee Ann .
    In: 2004 Conference (48th), February 11-13, 2004, Melbourne, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare04:58365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. REGIONAL DEMAND FOR NATURAL BEEF PRODUCTS IN COLORADO: TARGET CONSUMERS AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY. (2003). Thilmany, Dawn ; Sparling, Ed ; Grannis, Jennifer .
    In: Journal of Agribusiness.
    RePEc:ags:jloagb:14667.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Consumer Preferences for Public and Private Sector Certifications for Beef Products in the United States and the United Kingdom. (2003). Ward, Ruby ; Bailey, DeeVon ; Christensen, Bryan J. ; Hunnicutt, Lynn ; von Bailey, Dee.
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:34399.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-26 06:01:45 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.