US20040257065A1 - System bench wireless mapping board - Google Patents
System bench wireless mapping board Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040257065A1 US20040257065A1 US10/601,467 US60146703A US2004257065A1 US 20040257065 A1 US20040257065 A1 US 20040257065A1 US 60146703 A US60146703 A US 60146703A US 2004257065 A1 US2004257065 A1 US 2004257065A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- harness
- board box
- mapping
- board
- mapping board
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/28—Testing of electronic circuits, e.g. by signal tracer
- G01R31/2801—Testing of printed circuits, backplanes, motherboards, hybrid circuits or carriers for multichip packages [MCP]
- G01R31/2806—Apparatus therefor, e.g. test stations, drivers, analysers, conveyors
- G01R31/2808—Holding, conveying or contacting devices, e.g. test adapters, edge connectors, extender boards
Definitions
- PCB printed circuit boards
- embedded software have become common place in consumer and commercial products. As use of PCBs and embedded software has increased, so has the use of electronic modules.
- An electronic module (ECU) is a circuit on a PCB that performs a specific function. The ECU may use embedded software to perform complex functions.
- electronic modules perform a variety of functions, and control a wide variety of devices. In automobiles, electronic modules control the radio, brakes, overhead lighting, cruise control, wipers, etc. Outside of automobiles, electronic modules can control any electronic device, from streetlights to cameras, from televisions to telephones.
- Design engineers test systems of electronic modules to verify a new system's functionality.
- the engineers design and build test benches containing all of the electronic modules within the new system.
- An example of a system may be an entire electronic system in an automobile or an airplane.
- the testing of a system is done early in the design process, and therefore the actual, production-intent wiring harnesses are not available to interconnect the ECUs. Since the design engineers need to test the system functionality before the final electrical harnesses are created, they need to manually design and build a custom harness. After the engineer designs a new custom harness, a circuit map is created that indicates where the electrical signals from the ECUs should connect.
- the circuit map may involve the use of a spreadsheet program, such as Microsoft Excel from Microsoft, Inc. of Redmond, Wash.
- ECUs To ensure that the new system, and therefore the ECUs, function as designed, the ECUs are tested.
- Electronic module simulators are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The simulators simulate the sensor inputs to ECUs, such that the ECU software operates as though in the real environment. For example, instead of having a real engine present, the simulator simulates a real operating engine. As a result the ECU's software “thinks” it's connected to a real engine. It is also known that a system may comprise the use of multiple ECUs, each of which must be tested, alone and in concert with the other ECUs that comprise the new system.
- One aspect of the invention provides a system for testing electronic modules.
- the system comprises at least one mapping board box including at least one harness port and at least one harness operably connected at one end to the at least one harness port.
- the mapping board box further includes a plurality of electrical connection points in electronic communication with the at least one harness port.
- the electrical connection points are adapted to communicate between pins on ECUs and simulators, wherein the mapping board box is pre-wired to receive circuit boards with a variety of ECU configurations.
- a method of building the system to test an electronic module comprises pinning a circuit board corresponding to the interconnections between electronic modules and simulators and inserting the pinned circuit board into a pre-wired mapping board box.
- a system for testing an electronic module comprises means for receiving a circuit board and means for communicating between the circuit board receiving means and an electronic module.
- FIG. 1 shows a prior art system for testing electronic modules.
- FIG. 2 illustrates traces on a printed circuit board, as is known in the art
- FIG. 4 shows a cross section of a pinned printed circuit board, as is known in the art
- FIG. 5 illustrates a wireless mapping board box in accordance with one aspect of the instant invention
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart representing a method in accordance with another aspect of the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a wireless mapping board box 500 in accordance with one aspect of the invention.
- Box 500 comprises a wireless mapping board 510 , a mapping board box 580 and harness ports 590 .
- Wireless mapping board 510 is any pinned PCB.
- Board 510 may comprise any appropriate substrate for maintaining a circuit trace on its surface.
- Board 510 may comprise any number of traces of any length.
- Board 510 further comprises at least one pin connecting at least one trace.
- wireless mapping board may comprise between 0 and 560 pins in the board.
- board 510 is sized to fit within mapping board box 580 .
- Mapping board box 580 is a box adapted to receive a wireless mapping board.
- box 580 is sized to contain the wireless mapping board 510 , although other sizes are contemplated.
- Mapping board box 580 further comprises at least one harness port 590 .
- mapping board box 580 comprises 10 harness ports.
- Mapping board box 580 may comprise any appropriate material, including but not limited to plastics, metals, and wood.
- Mapping board box 580 further comprises means, or pin receptors, to receive the pins that are pinned to board 510 .
- box 580 comprises 560 pin receptors. Each pin receptor is pre-wired to connect with the harness port 590 .
- the pin receptors are arranged in grid fashion.
- the mapping board box comprises a grid of pin receptors equidistantly disposed amongst each other.
- Harness port 590 is an electrical connector that allows for communication between the board 510 and the testing unit (not shown in FIG. 5, but illustrated in FIG. 1 as 130 and in FIG. 6 as 680 ). Each harness port comprises at least one pin. In an example, and a currently preferred embodiment, harness port 590 comprises a 56 pin electrical connector, as known in the art. Each pin of the harness port 590 is in communication with a pin receptor of the box 580 . While the system is in use, the pins of harness port 590 are further in communication with the pins of the board 510 through the pin receptors of the box 580 . In a currently preferred embodiment, 10 harness ports 590 are attached to the wireless mapping board 510 , with each harness port 590 comprising 56 pins, and each connector pin is in electrical communication with a pin receptor of the board 510 .
- an Autosplice machine AutoSplice Inc. San Diego Calif.
- FIG. 3 reads a circuit map as provided by the engineer, and places a “pin” at the specified location to connect the branches of the pre-printed PCB.
- Use of an AutoSplice machine provides an alternative process to manually wiring the interconnections.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a pre-printed PCB 200 , comprising a substrate 210 and traces 220 .
- FIG. 4 is a cross section of a pinned PCB. As shown in FIG. 4, a pinned PCB comprises the substrate 410 and a pin 450 . Pin 450 extends at least partially though the thickness of the substrate 410 to ensure that the traces (not shown in FIG. 4) on the PCB are in electric communication
- FIG. 6 shows an electronic module 680 attached wireless mapping boxes 605 in accordance with one aspect of the instant invention with generic harnesses 670 in accordance with another aspect of the instant invention.
- Generic harnesses 670 attach to the box 680 with harness ports 690 (as in the harness ports 590 of FIG. 5) and enable electrical communication between the boxes.
- Box 605 is as described for Box 580 in FIG. 5.
- Harness 670 is adapted to be compatible with the harness ports 590 of FIG. 5.
- Harness 670 comprises wires that connect the pin receptors, and the pins from the mapping box 680 with the electronic modules being tested.
- harness 670 comprises 56 wires that communicate with the 56 pin receptors of the box that communicate with 56 pin receptors that communicate with 56 pins on the PCB to be tested.
- FIG. 6 further shows board 510 disposed within box 605 .
- FIG. 7 illustrates in flowchart fashion a method 700 of testing an electronic module.
- Method 700 begins at 710 when at least one printed circuit board is provided.
- Method of obtaining and manufacturing printed circuit boards are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
- the at least one printed circuit board comprises printed traces on a substrate.
- Method 700 continues by pinning the at least one printed circuit board to create an electronic module (Step 720 ).
- the at least one printed circuit board is pinned with an automatic pinning machine, although manual techniques for pinning circuit boards are known in the art.
- the printed circuit board communicates with an electronic module via the mapping board box and a harness (Step 740 ). This communication allows for the printed circuit board to be tested, to both ensure that the circuit operates to fulfill its intended purpose and to ensure that the board was correctly pinned.
- the method may be repeated to test further electronic modules, or the method may end if no further electronic modules are to be tested (Step 750 ).
- testing of an electronic module is simplified using a system as described in this invention.
- Use of the invention allows automatic routing of signals with autosplice pins rather than manually mapping the board. Any variety of electrical systems may be tested using the instant invention. Automatic routing improves the art by reducing manual wiring errors, and allowing benches to be reconfigured within 24 hours.
- Use of the pre-wired mapping board box enables the use of generic and reusable harnesses.
- the complexity of testing electronic modules is reduced by reducing manual wiring and reducing the time required to test the module. The ease of testing is increased by the use of generic harnesses, and the incidence of wiring errors may also be reduced. These factors may allow for cost savings and improve speed to market new electronic modules. In one experimental use, the time to construct a system bench was reduced from 6 months to one week.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tests Of Electronic Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- Printed circuit boards (PCB) and embedded software have become common place in consumer and commercial products. As use of PCBs and embedded software has increased, so has the use of electronic modules. An electronic module (ECU) is a circuit on a PCB that performs a specific function. The ECU may use embedded software to perform complex functions. In modern automobiles, electronic modules perform a variety of functions, and control a wide variety of devices. In automobiles, electronic modules control the radio, brakes, overhead lighting, cruise control, wipers, etc. Outside of automobiles, electronic modules can control any electronic device, from streetlights to cameras, from televisions to telephones.
- Design engineers test systems of electronic modules to verify a new system's functionality. The engineers design and build test benches containing all of the electronic modules within the new system. An example of a system may be an entire electronic system in an automobile or an airplane. The testing of a system is done early in the design process, and therefore the actual, production-intent wiring harnesses are not available to interconnect the ECUs. Since the design engineers need to test the system functionality before the final electrical harnesses are created, they need to manually design and build a custom harness. After the engineer designs a new custom harness, a circuit map is created that indicates where the electrical signals from the ECUs should connect. The circuit map may involve the use of a spreadsheet program, such as Microsoft Excel from Microsoft, Inc. of Redmond, Wash.
- To ensure that the new system, and therefore the ECUs, function as designed, the ECUs are tested. Electronic module simulators are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The simulators simulate the sensor inputs to ECUs, such that the ECU software operates as though in the real environment. For example, instead of having a real engine present, the simulator simulates a real operating engine. As a result the ECU's software “thinks” it's connected to a real engine. It is also known that a system may comprise the use of multiple ECUs, each of which must be tested, alone and in concert with the other ECUs that comprise the new system.
- As electronic modules have grown in popularity, they have also grown in complexity. Complexity may be measured, at least in part, by the number of pins inserted into the board, by the number of boards required for the electronic module, and by the amount of embedded software within each electronic module. Furthermore, while the actual testing of the electronic system is a complex process, preparing the new system for testing has been a comparatively time consuming, and error-prone process.
- In order to test the new electronic system, it is necessary to ensure that current flows and all the software functions as desired by the engineer. This assurance is provided by connecting the ECUs to ECU Simulators and by interconnecting the ECUs to each other. The interconnections represent the future interconnections in the new system. Each ECU pin is connected to a wire that is connected to a specific input of the simulators or other ECUs. This laborious process is fraught with the potential for error. Each pin is manually connected using a wire. While this process may be relatively efficient for 5 or 6 pins, when 500 or 600 pins are connected, the efficiency is degraded. When 3000 or 4000 pins are interconnected, efficiency is nearly lost. Furthermore, although complete accuracy is needed to ensure an accurate test, accuracy is quite difficult to obtain through a maze of 3000 wires.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art
testing system bench 100. System Bench 100 comprisesterminal strips 105 in electric communication withECUs 130 andsimulators 140 viawires 120.Wires 120 are individually connected to a particular pin onterminal strips 105. Between the individual pins on the terminal strips, the engineers manually wire all the interconnections between eachmodule 130 and eachsimulator 140. The manual wiring is done to represent the same interconnections on the future vehicle thesystem bench 100 represents. Those of ordinary skill in the art are well aware that the use ofterminal strips 105 is optional and often the engineers directly wire the interconnects betweenECUs 130 andsimulators 140. Although FIG. 1 is shown with 9total ECUs 130 andsimulators 140, those of ordinary skill in the art are well aware that systems with as few as one ECU are possible, with only practical limits for an upper bound for the number ofECUs 130 andsimulators 140. The complexity of thesystem bench 100 correlates directly, and in some systems exponentially, with the number ofECUs 130 andsimulators 140, and therefore the number ofwires 120. - What is needed therefore, is an improved apparatus and method for testing electronic modules that overcomes these, and other, limitations.
- One aspect of the invention provides a system for testing electronic modules. The system comprises at least one mapping board box including at least one harness port and at least one harness operably connected at one end to the at least one harness port. The mapping board box further includes a plurality of electrical connection points in electronic communication with the at least one harness port. The electrical connection points are adapted to communicate between pins on ECUs and simulators, wherein the mapping board box is pre-wired to receive circuit boards with a variety of ECU configurations.
- In another aspect of the invention, a method of building the system to test an electronic module is provided. The method comprises pinning a circuit board corresponding to the interconnections between electronic modules and simulators and inserting the pinned circuit board into a pre-wired mapping board box.
- In yet another aspect of the invention, a system for testing an electronic module is provided. The system comprises means for receiving a circuit board and means for communicating between the circuit board receiving means and an electronic module.
- The aforementioned, and other features and advantages of the invention, will become further apparent from the following detailed description of the presently preferred embodiments, read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The detailed description and drawings are merely illustrative of the invention rather than limiting, the scope of the invention being defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
- FIG. 1 shows a prior art system for testing electronic modules.;
- FIG. 2 illustrates traces on a printed circuit board, as is known in the art;
- FIG. 3 pictures an autosplice pin installation machine, as is known in the art;
- FIG. 4 shows a cross section of a pinned printed circuit board, as is known in the art;
- FIG. 5 illustrates a wireless mapping board box in accordance with one aspect of the instant invention;
- FIG. 6 illustrates a system for testing electronic modules in accordance with one aspect of the invention; and
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart representing a method in accordance with another aspect of the invention.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a wireless
mapping board box 500 in accordance with one aspect of the invention.Box 500 comprises awireless mapping board 510, amapping board box 580 andharness ports 590. -
Wireless mapping board 510 is any pinned PCB.Board 510 may comprise any appropriate substrate for maintaining a circuit trace on its surface.Board 510 may comprise any number of traces of any length.Board 510 further comprises at least one pin connecting at least one trace. In a currently preferred embodiment, wireless mapping board may comprise between 0 and 560 pins in the board. In an exemplary embodiment,board 510 is sized to fit withinmapping board box 580. -
Mapping board box 580 is a box adapted to receive a wireless mapping board. In a currently preferred embodiment,box 580 is sized to contain thewireless mapping board 510, although other sizes are contemplated.Mapping board box 580 further comprises at least oneharness port 590. In a currently preferred embodiment,mapping board box 580 comprises 10 harness ports.Mapping board box 580 may comprise any appropriate material, including but not limited to plastics, metals, and wood.Mapping board box 580 further comprises means, or pin receptors, to receive the pins that are pinned toboard 510. In an exemplary embodiment,box 580 comprises 560 pin receptors. Each pin receptor is pre-wired to connect with theharness port 590. In an exemplary embodiment, the pin receptors are arranged in grid fashion. In a currently preferred embodiment, the mapping board box comprises a grid of pin receptors equidistantly disposed amongst each other. -
Harness port 590 is an electrical connector that allows for communication between theboard 510 and the testing unit (not shown in FIG. 5, but illustrated in FIG. 1 as 130 and in FIG. 6 as680). Each harness port comprises at least one pin. In an example, and a currently preferred embodiment,harness port 590 comprises a 56 pin electrical connector, as known in the art. Each pin of theharness port 590 is in communication with a pin receptor of thebox 580. While the system is in use, the pins ofharness port 590 are further in communication with the pins of theboard 510 through the pin receptors of thebox 580. In a currently preferred embodiment, 10harness ports 590 are attached to thewireless mapping board 510, with eachharness port 590 comprising 56 pins, and each connector pin is in electrical communication with a pin receptor of theboard 510. - In an embodiment of the invention; an Autosplice machine, AutoSplice Inc. San Diego Calif., in FIG. 3 reads a circuit map as provided by the engineer, and places a “pin” at the specified location to connect the branches of the pre-printed PCB. Use of an AutoSplice machine provides an alternative process to manually wiring the interconnections. Once the PCB is pinned, the new Electrical System is intended to become functional, as the circuit should be complete, with an uninterrupted current flow from the input of the PCB to the output of the PCB. FIG. 2 illustrates a
pre-printed PCB 200, comprising asubstrate 210 and traces 220. FIG. 4 is a cross section of a pinned PCB. As shown in FIG. 4, a pinned PCB comprises thesubstrate 410 and apin 450.Pin 450 extends at least partially though the thickness of thesubstrate 410 to ensure that the traces (not shown in FIG. 4) on the PCB are in electric communication - FIG. 6 shows an
electronic module 680 attachedwireless mapping boxes 605 in accordance with one aspect of the instant invention withgeneric harnesses 670 in accordance with another aspect of the instant invention. Generic harnesses 670 attach to thebox 680 with harness ports 690 (as in theharness ports 590 of FIG. 5) and enable electrical communication between the boxes.Box 605 is as described forBox 580 in FIG. 5.Harness 670 is adapted to be compatible with theharness ports 590 of FIG. 5.Harness 670 comprises wires that connect the pin receptors, and the pins from themapping box 680 with the electronic modules being tested. In a currently preferred embodiment,harness 670 comprises 56 wires that communicate with the 56 pin receptors of the box that communicate with 56 pin receptors that communicate with 56 pins on the PCB to be tested. FIG. 6 further showsboard 510 disposed withinbox 605. - FIG. 7 illustrates in flowchart fashion a
method 700 of testing an electronic module.Method 700 begins at 710 when at least one printed circuit board is provided. Method of obtaining and manufacturing printed circuit boards are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. The at least one printed circuit board comprises printed traces on a substrate. -
Method 700 continues by pinning the at least one printed circuit board to create an electronic module (Step 720). In a currently preferred embodiment, the at least one printed circuit board is pinned with an automatic pinning machine, although manual techniques for pinning circuit boards are known in the art. - The at least one pinned circuit board is inserted into at least one pre-wired mapping board box (Step730). The at least one mapping board box is pre-wired to create electrical connection points, or pin receptors. When the pinned circuit board is inserted into the mapping board box, the pins are placed in electrical communication with the connections points or pin receptors. In a currently preferred embodiment, the mapping board box comprises a grid of pin receptors equidistantly disposed amongst each other.
- The printed circuit board communicates with an electronic module via the mapping board box and a harness (Step740). This communication allows for the printed circuit board to be tested, to both ensure that the circuit operates to fulfill its intended purpose and to ensure that the board was correctly pinned.
- The method may be repeated to test further electronic modules, or the method may end if no further electronic modules are to be tested (Step750).
- In operation, testing of an electronic module is simplified using a system as described in this invention. Use of the invention allows automatic routing of signals with autosplice pins rather than manually mapping the board. Any variety of electrical systems may be tested using the instant invention. Automatic routing improves the art by reducing manual wiring errors, and allowing benches to be reconfigured within 24 hours. Use of the pre-wired mapping board box enables the use of generic and reusable harnesses. Furthermore, the complexity of testing electronic modules is reduced by reducing manual wiring and reducing the time required to test the module. The ease of testing is increased by the use of generic harnesses, and the incidence of wiring errors may also be reduced. These factors may allow for cost savings and improve speed to market new electronic modules. In one experimental use, the time to construct a system bench was reduced from 6 months to one week.
- The scope of the invention is indicated in the appended claims. We intend that all changes or modifications within the meaning and range of equivalents are embraced by the claims.
Claims (11)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/601,467 US7239126B2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2003-06-23 | System bench wireless mapping board |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/601,467 US7239126B2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2003-06-23 | System bench wireless mapping board |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040257065A1 true US20040257065A1 (en) | 2004-12-23 |
US7239126B2 US7239126B2 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
Family
ID=33517982
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/601,467 Expired - Lifetime US7239126B2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2003-06-23 | System bench wireless mapping board |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7239126B2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050172176A1 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2005-08-04 | Ortiz Richard D. | Method of verifying a monitoring and responsive infrastructure of a system |
Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2050092A (en) * | 1931-03-16 | 1936-08-04 | Caxton Brown | Audion tube tester |
US2784371A (en) * | 1954-12-27 | 1957-03-05 | Bell Aircraft Corp | Fault tester for electron tubes |
US2795755A (en) * | 1956-05-31 | 1957-06-11 | Test M Mfg Co Inc U | Electronic tube testers |
US2881385A (en) * | 1953-04-27 | 1959-04-07 | Smith Allan Dean | Tube tester |
US3235797A (en) * | 1961-04-03 | 1966-02-15 | Philco Corp | Record controlled test set and magazine therefor having frangible finger encoding means |
US3302109A (en) * | 1962-12-12 | 1967-01-31 | Ibm | Apparatus and method for testing logic circuits and the like by the comparison of test output patterns with preprogrammed standard patterns |
US3409828A (en) * | 1964-10-30 | 1968-11-05 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Apparatus for testing electrical circuit boards |
US3549996A (en) * | 1967-04-04 | 1970-12-22 | Bendix Corp | Universal tester for dynamic and static tests on the operating efficiency of electrical apparatus |
US3646438A (en) * | 1967-06-14 | 1972-02-29 | Essex International Inc | Apparatus for testing different kinds of electromechanical components using preprogrammed connecting for each of the different components |
US3723867A (en) * | 1969-08-07 | 1973-03-27 | Olivetti & Co Spa | Apparatus having a plurality of multi-position switches for automatically testing electronic circuit boards |
US3870953A (en) * | 1972-08-01 | 1975-03-11 | Roger Boatman & Associates Inc | In circuit electronic component tester |
US4196386A (en) * | 1978-04-13 | 1980-04-01 | Ncr Corporation | Method and portable apparatus for testing digital printed circuit boards |
US4211917A (en) * | 1978-07-17 | 1980-07-08 | The Boeing Company | Circuit board testing apparatus and method |
US4348636A (en) * | 1980-07-09 | 1982-09-07 | Doundoulakis George J | Integrated circuit tester |
US4525802A (en) * | 1982-05-14 | 1985-06-25 | Cache Technology Corporation | Portable electronic testing apparatus |
US4561093A (en) * | 1983-02-22 | 1985-12-24 | Otis Elevator Company | Servicing a software-controlled elevator |
US4746861A (en) * | 1986-08-21 | 1988-05-24 | Tti Testron, Inc. | Test fixture for printed circuit board assembly |
US4769596A (en) * | 1985-04-23 | 1988-09-06 | Faucett Dale L | Printed circuit board tester |
US4771234A (en) * | 1986-11-20 | 1988-09-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Vacuum actuated test fixture |
US5406197A (en) * | 1992-07-31 | 1995-04-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus for controlling test inputs of circuits on an electronic module |
US5646522A (en) * | 1992-09-24 | 1997-07-08 | Hughes Electronics | Wireless test fixture for high frequency testing |
US6094057A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 2000-07-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Board for evaluating the characteristics of a semiconductor chip and a method for mounting a semiconductor chip thereon |
US6181146B1 (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | Nippon Steel Semiconductor Corp. | Burn-in board |
US6677745B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2004-01-13 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Test apparatus for parallel testing a number of electronic components and a method for calibrating the test apparatus |
-
2003
- 2003-06-23 US US10/601,467 patent/US7239126B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2050092A (en) * | 1931-03-16 | 1936-08-04 | Caxton Brown | Audion tube tester |
US2881385A (en) * | 1953-04-27 | 1959-04-07 | Smith Allan Dean | Tube tester |
US2784371A (en) * | 1954-12-27 | 1957-03-05 | Bell Aircraft Corp | Fault tester for electron tubes |
US2795755A (en) * | 1956-05-31 | 1957-06-11 | Test M Mfg Co Inc U | Electronic tube testers |
US3235797A (en) * | 1961-04-03 | 1966-02-15 | Philco Corp | Record controlled test set and magazine therefor having frangible finger encoding means |
US3302109A (en) * | 1962-12-12 | 1967-01-31 | Ibm | Apparatus and method for testing logic circuits and the like by the comparison of test output patterns with preprogrammed standard patterns |
US3409828A (en) * | 1964-10-30 | 1968-11-05 | Phillips Petroleum Co | Apparatus for testing electrical circuit boards |
US3549996A (en) * | 1967-04-04 | 1970-12-22 | Bendix Corp | Universal tester for dynamic and static tests on the operating efficiency of electrical apparatus |
US3646438A (en) * | 1967-06-14 | 1972-02-29 | Essex International Inc | Apparatus for testing different kinds of electromechanical components using preprogrammed connecting for each of the different components |
US3723867A (en) * | 1969-08-07 | 1973-03-27 | Olivetti & Co Spa | Apparatus having a plurality of multi-position switches for automatically testing electronic circuit boards |
US3870953A (en) * | 1972-08-01 | 1975-03-11 | Roger Boatman & Associates Inc | In circuit electronic component tester |
US4196386A (en) * | 1978-04-13 | 1980-04-01 | Ncr Corporation | Method and portable apparatus for testing digital printed circuit boards |
US4211917A (en) * | 1978-07-17 | 1980-07-08 | The Boeing Company | Circuit board testing apparatus and method |
US4348636A (en) * | 1980-07-09 | 1982-09-07 | Doundoulakis George J | Integrated circuit tester |
US4525802A (en) * | 1982-05-14 | 1985-06-25 | Cache Technology Corporation | Portable electronic testing apparatus |
US4561093A (en) * | 1983-02-22 | 1985-12-24 | Otis Elevator Company | Servicing a software-controlled elevator |
US4769596A (en) * | 1985-04-23 | 1988-09-06 | Faucett Dale L | Printed circuit board tester |
US4746861A (en) * | 1986-08-21 | 1988-05-24 | Tti Testron, Inc. | Test fixture for printed circuit board assembly |
US4771234A (en) * | 1986-11-20 | 1988-09-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Vacuum actuated test fixture |
US5406197A (en) * | 1992-07-31 | 1995-04-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus for controlling test inputs of circuits on an electronic module |
US5646522A (en) * | 1992-09-24 | 1997-07-08 | Hughes Electronics | Wireless test fixture for high frequency testing |
US6094057A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 2000-07-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Board for evaluating the characteristics of a semiconductor chip and a method for mounting a semiconductor chip thereon |
US6181146B1 (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 2001-01-30 | Nippon Steel Semiconductor Corp. | Burn-in board |
US6677745B2 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2004-01-13 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Test apparatus for parallel testing a number of electronic components and a method for calibrating the test apparatus |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050172176A1 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2005-08-04 | Ortiz Richard D. | Method of verifying a monitoring and responsive infrastructure of a system |
US7188275B2 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2007-03-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method of verifying a monitoring and responsive infrastructure of a system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7239126B2 (en) | 2007-07-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108205308B (en) | Automatic diagnosis test system based on automobile body domain controller | |
EP2169413B1 (en) | Automatic test equipment self test | |
WO2007098332A3 (en) | Electrical interconnect interface and wire harness test and test development system and method | |
EP3084368B1 (en) | Air mass flow measurement device and system | |
CN104482953A (en) | Automatic calibrating method, control device and system of automatic detecting equipment | |
JPH10185990A (en) | Test board for ic tester | |
US20060048015A1 (en) | System integration test rig for networked overall mechatronic systems | |
US7239126B2 (en) | System bench wireless mapping board | |
US7845956B1 (en) | Electrical component interface | |
CN209327868U (en) | The test macro of Vehicle Controller | |
CN210168053U (en) | Automatic test system for automobile Ethernet | |
Heiming et al. | Hardware-in-the-loop testing of networked electronics at Ford | |
CN114839453A (en) | Slave board wiring method of HIL test system and HIL test system | |
CN210123457U (en) | Commercial car low pressure electrical test system | |
KR102699127B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for controlling device under test connection in hils | |
CN220730355U (en) | Chip test board and test system | |
CN218350754U (en) | Automatic test equipment and system for 441 series control panel assembly | |
CN210923935U (en) | Wiring harness test tool for multiple interface sharing test circuit | |
CN220629352U (en) | High-density high-speed interconnection channel testing device based on VPX platform architecture | |
CN215219118U (en) | Wire harness module detection tool for vehicle test | |
CN209994042U (en) | Junction box device for debugging automobile exhaust after-treatment system controller | |
EP0946914B1 (en) | Methods and devices relating to circuit board constructions | |
KR100382248B1 (en) | Electrical test system of semiconductor & testing method the same | |
US7363608B2 (en) | Accelerating PCB development and debug in advance of platform ASIC prototype samples | |
Mouzakitis et al. | Automated fault diagnostics testing for automotive Electronic Control Units deploying Hardware-in-the-Loop |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WIMS, BRIAN A.;TOWNSEND, LEKIA P.;REEL/FRAME:014228/0414;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030616 TO 20030617 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022092/0755 Effective date: 20050119 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:022092/0755 Effective date: 20050119 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022201/0547 Effective date: 20081231 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECU Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 Owner name: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SEC Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022553/0399 Effective date: 20090409 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:023124/0470 Effective date: 20090709 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.,MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES;REEL/FRAME:023127/0273 Effective date: 20090814 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023156/0001 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 Owner name: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST,MICHIGAN Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023161/0911 Effective date: 20090710 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:025245/0347 Effective date: 20100420 Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST;REEL/FRAME:025311/0725 Effective date: 20101026 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0262 Effective date: 20101027 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025780/0902 Effective date: 20101202 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:034183/0680 Effective date: 20141017 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |