JP2016162174A - Job procedure table creation support program, method and apparatus - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To support the creation of an accurate job procedure table.SOLUTION: A job procedure table creation support method includes the steps of: (A) when a plurality of jobs including operation spots and operations or states at the operation spots are inputted while designating a job order, receiving input data of the plurality of jobs; (B) in accordance with check data including correspondence between a first operation or state and a second operation or state to be paired with the first operation or state and stored in a data storage part, judging whether a plurality of jobs included in the input data include a job for the first operation or state and a job for the second operation or state regarding the same operation spot; and (C) if only either the job for the first operation or state or the job for the second operation or state is included in the plurality of jobs regarding the same operation spot or if the number of jobs for the first operation or state and the number of jobs for the second operation or state are not matched regarding the same operation spot, outputting an error.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for supporting creation of a work procedure table.

  For example, it is important to prevent erroneous operations during power failure recovery operations before and after inspection, restoration of a circuit breaker, etc., and facility accidents due to forgetting to remove a grounding device during power failure work or inspection work for electrical equipment.

  Therefore, a work procedure table (also referred to as a work process table) is created in advance while confirming the work sequence and work contents against the contents of the electrical equipment, and when the actual work is performed, work is performed according to the work procedure table. I am doing so.

  However, conventionally, there are cases where the confirmation is insufficient and the work procedure table is inaccurate. Furthermore, there is a problem that an accurate work procedure table cannot be efficiently created.

  In addition, techniques such as construction work support and work process management have conventionally existed, but the creation of work procedure tables has not been sufficiently supported.

JP-A-10-273974 JP 2006-252226 A

  Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide, as one aspect, a technique for supporting the creation of an accurate work procedure table.

  In the work procedure table creation support method according to the present invention, (A) when a plurality of works each including an operation place and an operation or a state at the operation place are input by designating a work order, the plurality of work inputs A step of accepting data, and (B) according to check data stored in the data storage unit, including a correspondence between the first operation or state and the second operation or state paired with the first operation or state A determination step for determining whether a work for the first operation or state and a work for the second operation or state are included in the plurality of work included in the input data; and (C) the same operation If only one of the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state is included in the plurality of works, or the first operation for the same operation place Or if the number of operations for the state and the number of work for the second operation or condition is mismatched, and outputting an error.

  As one aspect, it is possible to support the creation of an accurate work procedure table.

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of an information processing apparatus according to an embodiment. FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a display screen according to the embodiment. FIG. 3 is a diagram for explaining the initialization process. FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining individual display switching. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining individual display switching. FIG. 6 is a diagram for explaining individual display switching. FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining the table shaping process. FIG. 8 is a diagram for explaining the table shaping process. FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining the list shaping process. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of the pair check table. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a processing flow of pair check processing by the check unit. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of the check setting table. FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a processing flow of the check processing. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating a processing flow of the check processing. FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an error display example. FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a pull-down menu displayed in the individual check process. FIG. 17 is a diagram for explaining a process of jumping to an interference destination. FIG. 18 is a diagram for explaining a process of jumping to an interference destination. FIG. 19 is a diagram for explaining the process of jumping to the interference destination. FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating a processing flow of processing for jumping to an interference destination. FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating an example of the check rule setting screen. FIG. 22 is a diagram showing an example of the overall work flow. FIG. 23 is a functional block diagram of a computer.

  A functional configuration example of the information processing apparatus according to the present embodiment is shown in FIG.

  The information processing apparatus shown in FIG. 1 executes a spreadsheet-based work procedure input support program 100, thereby enabling an edit support processing unit 101, a check unit 102, a control unit 103, a check data storage unit 104, and data A storage unit 105 and a reference data storage unit 106 are realized.

  The editing support processing unit 101 executes processing for supporting the work of the user inputting the work procedure table in the spreadsheet.

  The check unit 102 performs processing for checking whether an error is included in the work procedure table input by the user, and includes a setting unit 1021 and a reference data extraction unit 1022. The setting unit 1021 executes processing for the user to set the check contents of the check processing. When the check unit 102 performs a check, the reference data extraction unit 1022 extracts and outputs reference data (such as an accident case and a standard work procedure) stored in the reference data storage unit 106.

  The control unit 103 operates the editing support processing unit 101 and the check unit 102 in accordance with an instruction from the user.

  The check data storage unit 104 stores data (check setting table, pair check data, etc.) used for the check process by the check unit 102. The data storage unit 105 stores data such as a work procedure table. The reference data storage unit 106 stores reference data extracted by the reference data extraction unit 1022.

  For example, a screen as shown in FIG. 2 is displayed on the display device of the information processing apparatus by executing the work procedure input support program 100.

  This screen example includes an upper instruction section B and a lower spreadsheet section A. The spreadsheet part A shows a part of the work procedure table. The work procedure table in the present embodiment includes a work order (No.), a scheduled time, a work item, a place, an operation place including a board name and equipment of an operation panel, an operation or state, an instructor, Includes input items such as operator, confirmer, and remarks. In the work procedure table, these input items are input in the order of work.

  On the other hand, the instruction unit B includes a batch process instruction unit B1, an edit process instruction unit B2, a check process instruction unit B3, a display process instruction unit B4, a real time instruction unit B5, and a setting unit B6.

  The edit processing instruction unit B2 includes a table shaping instruction unit 201 for displaying ruled lines, a list shaping instruction unit 202 for collecting input candidates for input items, and a header for displaying a work procedure table header. The initialization instruction unit 203 is included.

  The check processing instruction unit B3 is associated with all check instruction units 211 for executing all check items (also referred to as conditions), individual check instruction units 212 for executing each of the check items, and error detection. A jump instruction unit 213 to the interference destination for moving the cursor to the line and a setting wizard instruction unit 214 for setting check items are included.

  The display processing instruction unit B4 includes an all display instruction unit 221 for displaying all input items, and an individual display switching instruction unit 222 for individually switching display / non-display of columns.

  The real-time instruction unit B5 has a check instruction unit 231 for performing a check every time data is input to any of the input items, and a table is formed each time data is input to any of the input items. And a list shaping instruction unit 233 for causing the list to be shaped each time data is input to any of the input items.

  The setting unit B6 sets the opacity of the pseudo-joining opacity setting unit 241 and the number of work procedures for setting the opacity of characters in the pseudo-joined cells when the cells are pseudo-joined by table shaping. And a renumbering instructing unit 242 for performing again.

  The batch processing instruction unit B1 includes a table shaping instruction unit 201, a list shaping instruction unit 202, and an all execution instruction unit for collectively instructing the check instruction unit 211.

  Hereinafter, processing performed by the instruction unit B will be described individually.

  First, when the header initialization instruction unit 203 in the editing process instruction unit B2 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to perform initialization processing. Then, for example, the editing support processing unit 101 clears the work procedure table in the spreadsheet unit A. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the editing support processing unit 101 displays only the header of the table including the input items to be input by the user. Note that before the header is initialized, the user may be allowed to perform a procedure for deleting all data input to the spreadsheet part A.

  Further, in the state as shown in FIG. 3, when the individual display switching instruction unit 222 in the display processing instruction unit B4 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to perform individual display switching. Then, for example, the editing support processing unit 101 displays a pull-down menu as shown in FIG. 4 to allow the user to select a column (or a column to be displayed) that is not displayed in the work procedure table. In the pull-down menu, input items in the work procedure table are listed. For example, when the user selects “operator”, the “operator” column is hidden as shown in FIG.

  On the other hand, when the individual display switching instruction unit 222 is clicked again in the state as shown in FIG. 5, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to switch the individual display again. Then, the editing support processing unit 101 displays a pull-down menu as shown in FIG. 4 to allow the user to select a column that is not displayed in the work procedure table or a column that is displayed. Here, when the user selects “operator”, a column of “operator” is displayed as shown in FIG.

  When the all display instruction unit 221 in the display processing instruction unit B4 is clicked in a state as shown in FIG. 5, for example, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to display all. Then, the editing support processing unit 101 performs processing to return the display as shown in FIG. 5 to the display as shown in FIG.

  Further, it is assumed that the user inputs the input items for each work in order in the spreadsheet part A and enters a state as shown in FIG. That is, it is assumed that six operations have been input. However, the work item of all the six works is “power failure operation”, and the board name is common to “high voltage power receiving board” from the third work to the fifth work. As described above, the work item and the operation location may be difficult to see if they are displayed as they are when common names are consecutive.

  Therefore, when the table shaping instruction unit 201 in the editing process instruction unit B2 is clicked in the state shown in FIG. 7, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to perform table shaping processing. Then, the editing support processing unit 101 basically displays ruled lines on the top, bottom, left and right of the cell. However, for work items, a range of consecutive identical work items is searched, and ruled lines are omitted within the range. Similarly, for the operation location, a range of consecutive identical operation locations is searched, and ruled lines are omitted in the range. Further, the head work item name and operation part name are displayed as usual within the detected range, but the other work item name and operation part name are displayed in the setting unit B6 for the opacity setting part of pseudo-joint. The opacity specified by 241 is displayed. Such processing is called pseudo-joining. The date and time are handled in the same way. Specifically, a display as shown in FIG. 8 is performed.

  In the example of FIG. 8, for the column of work numbers (No.), ruled lines are displayed for each row even if no numbers are input. As for the date and time, there is input in the first line, but there is no input in the second and subsequent lines, that is, blanks are continuous, so the second to sixth lines are pseudo-joined, and ruled lines are omitted in that range. Has been. In addition, since the work items are the same from the first line to the sixth line, they are pseudo-joined, the ruled lines are omitted in the range, and only the first “power failure operation” is normally displayed, and the second line The sixth to sixth lines are displayed with a specified opacity. As for the places, since the blanks are continuous, the first to sixth lines are pseudo-coupled, and the ruled lines are omitted in the range. As for the board name, the 3rd to 5th lines are “high voltage power receiving panel” continuously, so the ruled lines are omitted in this range and only the top “high voltage power receiving panel” is normally displayed. The fourth and fifth lines are displayed with a specified opacity. In this case, ruled lines surrounding each cell are displayed for the other columns.

  Furthermore, in the state shown in FIG. 8, when the list shaping instruction unit 202 in the editing process instruction unit B2 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the editing support processing unit 101 to format the list. Then, for example, the editing support processing unit 101 scans the board name column of the operation location, and collects the character strings that appear in the column as input candidates. Further, the editing support processing unit 101 collects character strings that appear for each board name as input candidates for the device column at the operation location.

  For example, in the case of a panel name, “high voltage power panel”, “high voltage cabinet”, “high voltage power panel”, “low voltage power panel”, and the like are collected as input candidates. In the case of a device, “52R”, “89R”, “−”, “safety ground”, etc. are collected as input candidates for the “high voltage power receiving panel”.

  In the example of FIG. 8, for example, when the column of “high voltage power receiving panel” is clicked, a drop-down list as shown in FIG. 9 is displayed. That is, “52R”, “89R”, “−”, and “safety ground” are displayed as input candidates for “high voltage power receiving panel”.

  For work items and operation / state columns, predefined input candidates may be displayed as a drop-down list. For example, data stored in the check data storage unit 104 may be used. More specifically, a character string of pair check data may be used as an input candidate.

  When the check instruction unit 231, the table shaping instruction unit 232, and the list shaping instruction unit 233 in the real-time instruction unit B 5 are instructed by the user to give a check, the control unit 103 performs the editing support process. The unit 101 and the check unit 102 are instructed to always execute a function to which a check is given when any cell is input.

  Further, when the renumbering instruction unit 242 in the setting unit B6 is checked and the table shaping instruction unit 201 in the editing process instruction unit B2 is clicked, the control unit 103 causes the editing support processing unit 101 to renumber. Output instructions. The editing support processing unit 101 executes processing for assigning numbers from 1 in order from the top in the column of work numbers (No.) in the work procedure table. As for the work numbers, as shown in FIG. 2, numbers are assigned to the respective rows in order from 1. In addition, after such a process is performed once, when a line is added or deleted, each line is numbered in order from 1 again.

  Next, a check process by the check unit 102 will be described. In the present embodiment, a default check process and a user-defined check process are performed.

  The default check process includes a duplication check, a pair check, and an order check (for example, disconnector opening operation check, protector operation check, and disconnector insertion operation check).

  The duplication check is a process for determining whether or not the same work is defined in the work procedure table. The pair check is a process for mainly determining whether or not the board has been restored, for example, when the work procedure has been completed without “inserting” after “opening”. The order check is a process for determining whether the second work appears with respect to the first work in accordance with the prescribed order relation or whether it does not appear in the prescribed order relation.

  For the pair check, for example, a pair check table as shown in FIG. 10 is prepared. In the present embodiment, the value of the column of Positive (P) and the value of the column of Negative (N) are defined as a pair for the operation / state. For example, if an operation or state “injection” is defined, it indicates that an operation or state “open” must be defined for the same operation location.

  Accordingly, when the check unit 102 detects a work including one value of P or N in the work procedure table, the check unit 102 determines whether or not a work including the other value is included for the same operation location. If it is determined that the work including the other value is not included, the check unit 102 outputs an error. Further, when it is determined that the number of operations including one value of P or N does not match the number of operations including the other value, the check unit 102 outputs an error.

  For example, the check unit 102 executes a process as shown in FIG. The check unit 102 identifies one unprocessed pair check item (that is, one row) in the pair check table (step S1). Then, the check unit 102 searches the work procedure table by the first operation (that is, operation or state) of the identified pair check item (step S3). Here, it is specified which work (that is, line) corresponds. Multiple tasks may be applicable.

  Thereafter, the check unit 102 determines whether or not the first operation is included in the operation or status column of the work procedure table (step S5). If the first operation is not included, the check unit 102 In the operation or status column of the work procedure table, a search is performed with the second operation (ie, operation or status) of the specified pair check item, and it is determined whether or not the second operation is included in the work procedure table. (Step S7).

  If the second operation is not included in the operation or status column of the work procedure table, neither the first operation nor the second operation is included, so the process proceeds to step S19. On the other hand, when the second operation is included in the operation or status column of the work procedure table, since the pair is not established, the process proceeds to step S17.

  On the other hand, when the first operation is included in the operation or status column of the work procedure table, the check unit 102 operates the work procedure table for each operation location where the first operation is detected. Alternatively, the state column is searched by the second operation (that is, operation or state) of the specified pair check item (step S9). Then, the check unit 102 determines whether or not the second operation is included in the operation or status column of the work procedure table (step S11). If the second operation is not included, the process proceeds to step S17. Transition. On the other hand, if the second operation is included, the process proceeds to step S13.

  In step S17, since the pair is not established, the check unit 102 performs work related to the detected first operation or second operation (work related to the first and second operations in the case of passing through step S15). ) And an error are displayed (step S17). As a result, the user can easily identify the work having a problem. Then, the process proceeds to step S19.

  Further, in step S13, the check unit 102, for each operation location of the work in which the first operation is detected, the number of works including the detected first operation and the work including the detected second operation. The number is totaled (step S13). In the work procedure table, a plurality of operations including “open” are defined, and a plurality of operations including “input” may be defined. In the present embodiment, if the pair is established, the number of operations including the first operation matches the number of operations including the second operation, so this condition is employed.

  Therefore, if the number of works including the detected first operation and the number of works including the detected second operation are inconsistent with respect to any operation location, the process proceeds to step S17. (Step S15: Yes route). On the other hand, for any operation location, if the number of detected operations including the first operation matches the detected number of operations including the second operation, the process proceeds to step S19 ( Step S15: No route).

  Then, the check unit 102 determines whether or not there is an unprocessed pair check item in the pair check table (step S19). If it exists, the process proceeds to step S1. On the other hand, if it does not exist, the process ends.

  On the other hand, regarding the order check, the first work and the second work are defined, and the relative order of the first work and the second work (before or after, also referred to as a positional relationship). ) And whether or not to execute the second work (whether it should be executed or not). Then, when the first work is detected in the work procedure table, the search range (before or after) of the second work is specified from the relative order included in the condition. Then, it is determined whether or not the second work is defined in the search range, and it is determined whether or not the determination result is appropriate based on whether or not the execution is included in the condition. If the second work is specified in spite of the fact that the second work should not be executed, it is determined that the second work is not valid and the second work should be executed in the condition. However, if the second work is not defined, it is determined that it is not appropriate. If it is not valid, an error is output.

  More specifically, a check setting table as shown in FIG. 12 is prepared. In the example of FIG. 12, the condition name, the content of the error message (including the message and color), the valid flag of the condition, the first work (work 1), the positional relationship of the work 2 with respect to the work 1, 2 work (work 2) and the correct state of the second work (work 2).

  In the check setting table of FIG. 12, five default conditions are defined. However, when specified by the user, a condition name different from other conditions is set as the condition name. Regarding the contents of the error message, the message and the color are specified for the user-specified conditions. For the valid flag, TRUE is set if the condition is valid, and FALSE is set if the condition is invalid.

  For work items, places, panels, and equipment in the first work, conditions are defined by “name” and “condition”. A search character string is set for “name”. A plurality of character strings may be specified. Search conditions such as “not specified”, “match”, and “include” are set for “condition”. Further, the operation or state in the first work is defined by a “value” and a “condition”. N or P in the search character string or the pair check table is set for “value”. That is, one or more arbitrary search character strings or a negative character string or a positive character string defined in the pair check table is designated by N or P. For “condition”, search conditions such as “not specified”, “match”, “include”, and “NP value” are defined. The NP value is adopted when N or P is set in the “value”.

  Regarding the positional relationship of the work 2, one of “not specified”, “front”, “after”, and “not specified (including work 1)” is set. The search range of the second work is specified by this condition. “Not specified” makes the work except the work 1 the search range. “Previous” sets a search range to a work before work 1. In “after”, a work after work 1 is set as a search range. “Not specified (including work 1)” makes all work in the work procedure table the search range.

  Regarding the work item, place, board, and equipment in the second work, conditions are defined by “name” and “condition”. A search character string is set for “name”. Search conditions such as “not specified”, “match”, “include”, and “operation 1” are set for “condition”. “Work 1” means the same as the first work.

  Further, the operation or state in the second work is defined by a “value” and a “condition”. N or P in the search character string or the pair check table is set for “value”. That is, one or more arbitrary search character strings or a negative character string or a positive character string defined in the pair check table is designated. For “condition”, search conditions such as “not specified”, “match”, “include”, “operation 1”, and “NP value” are defined. The NP value is adopted when N or P is set in the “value”. “Work 1” means the same as the first work.

  The correct state of the second operation (operation 2) is defined by “item” and “value”. For “item”, “number of hits” or “NP integrated value” is set. “Number of hits” represents the number of detections of the second operation. “NP integrated value” is “−1” when N appears once, “+1” when P appears once, and “0” when others appear, and adds a value for each occurrence of N and P. Means that. For “value”, a condition value for “item” is set.

  In this way, when the second operation is to be performed, the hit number may be set to 1 or more. When the second operation is not to be performed, the hit number is set to 0. do it. Further, for the pair check, if the first work is work for Negative, the second work is work for Positive for the same operation location, but if the pair is composed of one or more components, the first work The NP integrated value of the second work and the second work is always “0”.

  A generalized process flow in the case of performing a check process using such a check setting table will be described with reference to FIGS.

  First, the check unit 102 identifies unprocessed conditions whose validity flag is TRUE in the check setting table, for example, as conditions to be processed in order from the top (FIG. 13: step S21).

  Then, the check unit 102 searches the work procedure table for a work corresponding to the work 1 in the processing target condition (step S23). Multiple operations may be detected. If there is no work corresponding to work 1 in the work procedure table (step S25: No route), the process proceeds to step S41 in FIG.

  On the other hand, when a work corresponding to work 1 is detected in the work procedure table (step S25: Yes route), the check unit 102 identifies one unprocessed work among the work corresponding to work 1 (step S27). ).

  Then, the check unit 102 specifies the search range for the specified work from the positional relationship of the work 2 under the processing target condition (step S29). As described above, there are cases where the work is “before” and “after” the identified work. Furthermore, it may be all work, or it may be other work except the specified work.

  And the check part 102 searches the operation | work 2 in the conditions of a process target in the specified search range (step S31). At this time, the number of hits is counted or the NP integrated value is calculated as defined in the correct state of the work 2 under the processing target condition. Note that when a work corresponding to the work 2 is detected, the line is specified.

  Then, the check unit 102 determines whether or not the search result represents a normal state (that is, a correct state of the work 2) in the processing target condition (step S33). That is, it is determined whether the number of hits is as specified or whether the NP integrated value is as specified. If the search result indicates a normal state, the process proceeds to step S37 in FIG.

  On the other hand, when the search result does not indicate a normal state, the check unit 102 determines the line of the identified work (the work line corresponding to the work 2 if the work corresponding to the work 2 is detected) and the processing target. The conditions are associated with each other and stored as error data in a storage device such as a main memory (step S35). Then, the process proceeds to step S37 in FIG.

  Shifting to the description of the processing in FIG. 14, the check unit 102 determines whether there is an unprocessed task among the tasks corresponding to the task 1 (step S <b> 37). If there is an unprocessed work, the process returns to step S27 in FIG.

  On the other hand, when there is no unprocessed work among the work corresponding to the work 1, the check unit 102 determines whether or not there is an error depending on whether or not error data is stored by executing step S35. (Step S38). If there is no error, the process proceeds to step S41.

  On the other hand, if there is an error, the check unit 102 displays the detected error using the error data specified in step S35 (step S39). The display mode of the error is as defined in the content of the error message included in the condition to be processed, and may be colored. When adding a color, for example, the color is added to the line number portion of the line related to the error. The error message may be popped up, or may be displayed by a balloon or the like when the cursor is moved to the corresponding line. You may make it add and show the line number of the related work to an error message. Then, the process proceeds to step S41.

  The error display is, for example, as shown in FIG. If the cell with work number “3” is painted in red, for example, and the cursor is moved to that cell, the error message “Operation is duplicated (influence on lines 6 and 22)” will be displayed. It has become. The row number indicates the row number in the spreadsheet.

  The check unit 102 determines whether or not an unprocessed condition exists in the check setting table (step S41). If an unprocessed condition exists, the process returns to step S21 in FIG. On the other hand, if there is no unprocessed condition, the process ends.

  In this way, various checks can be performed.

  When the check instruction unit 211 of the check process instruction unit B3 in the instruction unit B in the screen example of FIG. 2 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the check unit 102 to perform the processing described above. To do. On the other hand, when the individual check instruction unit 212 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the check unit 102 to display a pull-down menu listing the condition names in the check setting table. The check unit 102 displays a pull-down menu listing the condition names in the check setting table according to the instruction. For example, in the case of a check setting table as shown in FIG. 12, a pull-down menu as shown in FIG. 16 is displayed. When the user clicks on one of the condition names, the check unit 102 executes only a check for the condition name.

  Next, for example, when the user clicks the jump instruction unit 213 to the interference destination in the check processing instruction unit B3 after placing the cursor on the line where the error has occurred, the control unit 103 causes the check unit 102 to go to the interference destination. Instructs the cursor to jump. For example, as shown in FIG. 17, the cursor 1601 is arranged on the sixth line with the work number “3”. Thereafter, when the user clicks the jump instruction unit 213 to the interference destination, a pull-down menu is displayed as shown in FIG. That is, an error message related to the cursor placement line and a related line number other than the cursor placement line are displayed. Several error messages may be displayed here.

  When an error message is selected here, the check unit 102 moves the cursor from the current cursor placement row to the cell of the work number in the related row number. In the example of FIGS. 17 and 18, as shown in FIG. 19, the cursor 1801 is displayed in the cell of the work number “19” in the 22nd row. This makes it easier to correct errors.

  Such a process of causing the cursor to jump to the interference destination is implemented, for example, by the check unit 102 performing a process as shown in FIG.

  The check unit 102 identifies the cursor line where the cursor is currently placed (step S51). Then, the check unit 102 determines whether there is an error associated with the cursor line (step S53). As described above, since the error data including the data of the related row is stored in the storage device for the error detected in the check process, whether or not there is error data including the cursor row is determined. to decide. If there is no error associated with the cursor line, the process ends.

  On the other hand, when there is an error associated with the cursor line, the check unit 102 presents the associated error message and another line related to the cursor line to the user (step S55). Here, a display as shown in FIG. 18 is made.

  Then, when the user selects any error message or another line related to the cursor line, the check unit 102 moves the cursor to another line for the selected error message (step S57). In the example described above, the state transitions to that shown in FIG.

  In this way, errors in the work procedure table can be easily corrected.

  When the setting wizard included in the check processing instruction unit B3 in the screen example of FIG. 2 is clicked, the control unit 103 instructs the setting unit 1021 of the check unit 102 to perform setting processing. For example, the setting unit 1021 displays a check rule setting screen as shown in FIG.

  This check rule setting screen is a screen for simply inputting data into the check setting table. A device input field 2101 and an operation or status input field 2102 for defining the first work, a check box 2103 for defining the positional relationship of the second work with respect to the first work, and a second work are defined A device input field 2104 and an operation or status input field 2105 for performing the operation, and a check box 2106 for defining whether to execute the second work. Furthermore, a rule deletion button and a rule application button are also included. In the operation or status input fields 2102 and 2105, input candidates input so far may be presented and selected, or may be directly input. With respect to the check box 2106, when “Yes” is selected, a state where the number of hits is 1 or more is set as a correct state. When “No” is selected, a state where the number of hits is 0 is set as a correct state. If you click the Apply Rule button after entering, the input data is set in the check setting table. For more complicated conditions, data is directly input to the check setting table.

  By introducing the work procedure input support program 100 having the functions as described above to a business operator who performs, for example, electrical work (for example, power failure / recovery work), the work procedure table can be created more efficiently. Furthermore, since various checks can be performed, an accurate work procedure table can be created. In addition, the work procedure table and its data can be used not only for pre-preparation of construction work but also for construction execution reports.

  The check setting table for performing such a check may be specific to a specific construction or may be generally applicable. In general, applicable parts can be copied and used to make it easier to check when creating other work procedure tables.

  Note that the work procedure table is created for a part of the whole work (for example, one attached with procedure management) as shown in FIG. 22, for example. For example, a work procedure table including lower-order work items as described above is created for higher-order work items such as temporary power supply switching, power failure preparation, power failure operation, power recovery work, and temporary power supply switchback. The check process may be performed for each work procedure table including lower-level work items, or pair check is performed together with power outage preparation and power outage operation and power recovery work as shown by the line in FIG. It is preferable to perform such a check process. Similarly, it is preferable to perform check processing such as pair check in combination with temporary power source switching and temporary power source switchback. Alternatively, the check process may be performed for a higher-order work item group defined in the entire day work as shown in FIG. Furthermore, even in the case of construction that exceeds one day, if the construction is integrated, work items may be divided into several levels and checked for each level.

  Moreover, this embodiment is applicable not only to periodic inspections but also to other work such as trunk line switching work and equipment replacement work.

  Furthermore, a risk management table is often created for each construction in order to find work risks (for example, danger), take measures to reduce the risks, and re-evaluate the risks. For example, in a system for creating a risk management table, a work procedure table may be created by starting a work procedure input support program as described above for individual work items in the risk management table.

Although the embodiment of the present invention has been described above, the present invention is not limited to this. That is, the same function can be realized by adopting various mounting methods. For example, the functional block configuration shown in FIG. 1 does not necessarily match the program module configuration. As for the processing flow, as long as the processing result does not change, the processing order of the steps may be changed, or a plurality of steps may be executed in parallel. In addition, when there are a plurality of tasks that may be executed in parallel, for example, the task numbers may be the same, or a column of group flags is additionally provided, and columns with the same flag set are executed in parallel. Such a rule may be adopted. Furthermore, data representing the possibility of parallel execution may be additionally defined.
Also, priority and other application conditions may be set between the rows (ie, conditions) in the check setting table of FIG. For example, a premise that the higher the priority is in the upper row of the check setting table may be provided. Furthermore, there are cases where a complicated check condition is generated by combining a plurality of conditions. For example, it is possible to set a condition such that duplication check is not performed or an error in duplication check is ignored for an operation group for the same operation location determined as no error in the pair check. For example, there are cases where the same operation location “breaker B352R” is operated in the following order.
Circuit breaker B352R Automatic closing circuit breaker B352R Automatic opening circuit breaker B352R Disconnect circuit breaker B352R Automatic closing circuit breaker B352R Automatic opening In this way, when the same operation point is repeatedly turned on and opened, no error is detected in the pair check. However, if the duplication check is simply performed, an error is detected for the operation “automatic input” and the operation “automatic release”. Since this is troublesome for the user, as described above, the pair check is preferentially executed, and the operation group determined to have no error in the pair check (the first operation, the second operation, Regarding the fourth operation and the fifth operation), it is preferable that the duplication check is not performed, or even if an error is detected by the duplication check, it is ignored.

  The information processing apparatus described above is a computer apparatus, and as shown in FIG. 23, a memory 2501, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 2503, a hard disk drive (HDD: Hard Disk Drive) 2505, and a display apparatus 2509. A display control unit 2507 connected to the computer, a drive device 2513 for a removable disk 2511, an input device 2515, and a communication control unit 2517 for connecting to a network are connected by a bus 2519. An operating system (OS) and an application program for executing the processing in this embodiment are stored in the HDD 2505, and are read from the HDD 2505 to the memory 2501 when executed by the CPU 2503. The CPU 2503 controls the display control unit 2507, the communication control unit 2517, and the drive device 2513 according to the processing content of the application program, and performs a predetermined operation. Further, data in the middle of processing is mainly stored in the memory 2501, but may be stored in the HDD 2505. In an embodiment of the present technology, an application program for performing the above-described processing is stored in a computer-readable removable disk 2511 and distributed, and installed from the drive device 2513 to the HDD 2505. In some cases, the HDD 2505 may be installed via a network such as the Internet and the communication control unit 2517. Such a computer apparatus realizes various functions as described above by organically cooperating hardware such as the CPU 2503 and the memory 2501 described above and programs such as the OS and application programs. .

  The above-described embodiment can be summarized as follows.

  In the work procedure table creation support method according to the present embodiment, (A) when a plurality of works each including an operation place and an operation or a state at the operation place are input by specifying a work order, the plurality of works And (B) a check including a correspondence between the first operation or state and the second operation or state paired with the first operation or state, and stored in the data storage unit A determination step for determining whether a plurality of operations included in the input data includes a first operation or a state operation and a second operation or a state operation in the plurality of operations included in the input data according to the data; (C) When only one of the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state is included in a plurality of work for the same operation place, If the number of operations for the operation or the state and the number of work for the second operation or condition is mismatched, and outputting an error.

  In a construction such as a power failure / recovery construction, both of the paired work must be defined in the work procedure table. Therefore, by performing such a process, it becomes possible to detect a specified omission, so that an accurate work procedure table can be created.

  Further, the work procedure table creation support method described above includes (D) a step of determining whether or not the same operation is defined repeatedly for the same operation location in a plurality of operations, and (E) a plurality of steps In the work, when the same work is defined redundantly for the same operation location, an error output step may be further included. This is to warn the user when the same work is specified by mistake.

  Further, the work procedure table creation support method described above includes (F) a relative order of the first work, the second work related to the first work, the first work, and the second work. And whether or not the first work is included in a plurality of work in accordance with the second check data stored in the data storage unit and associated with a condition indicating whether or not to execute the second work. A step of determining, and (G) if the first work is included in the plurality of work, search in the plurality of work from the relative order included in the condition associated with the first work. A step of setting a range; (H) a step of determining whether or not a second work associated with the first work is included in the set search range; and (I) a second work is included. The result of the decision as to whether or not The method further includes a step of determining whether or not it is appropriate based on whether the execution is included in the attached condition, and (J) a step of outputting an error when a plurality of operations are not appropriate. good.

  In this way, it is possible to check the work whose order is fixed.

  Furthermore, in the work procedure table creation support method described above, (K) in the case where the same work is defined redundantly in a plurality of work, if one of the same work is designated, You may make it further include the step which displays the other of work so that identification is possible. This is to facilitate correction.

  Similarly, the work procedure table creation support method described above includes (L) the second work, and if the condition associated with the first work indicates execution failure, When one of the first work and the second work is designated, a step of displaying the other work in an identifiable manner may be further included. This is to facilitate correction.

  Furthermore, the work procedure table creation support method described above includes (M) a step of presenting a predetermined input item including a work item name, a work location, and an operation or state of the work location on a spreadsheet, (N ) According to the ruled line display instruction, when work with the same work item name continues or when work with the same work location continues, a ruled line surrounding the same work item name range or the same work location range is displayed. And the step of performing may be further included. This makes it possible to create a work procedure table that is easier to see.

  In the work procedure table creation support method described above, in the step of displaying ruled lines, in the range of the same work item name or the same work location, except for one work name or one work location, You may make it display with the set opacity. This makes it easy to see the work procedure table.

  Furthermore, the work procedure table creation support method described above further includes (O) a step of displaying input candidates set in advance for input items or data already input for input items as input candidates. Also good. This makes it easy to create a work procedure table.

  Further, the work procedure table creation support method described above includes (P) a plurality of pieces of reference data stored in association with any one of the operation location, the operation or state at the operation location, and the work item name. A step of extracting and displaying at least one of the operations may be further included. For example, by presenting accident cases, detailed procedure data, etc., it is possible to appropriately prepare for construction and the like in advance.

  In the work procedure table creation support method described above, the number of work for the first operation or state matches the number of work for the second operation or state for the same operation location, and the number of the work. Whether or not the same operation is defined for the same operation location with respect to the operation for the first operation or the state and the operation for the second operation or the state. The determination step may be omitted, or the output of errors regarding duplication may be suppressed. In this way, it is possible to suppress the troublesomeness of the confirmation work.

  It is possible to create a program for causing a computer to carry out the processing described above, such as a flexible disk, an optical disk such as a CD-ROM, a magneto-optical disk, and a semiconductor memory (for example, ROM). Or a computer-readable storage medium such as a hard disk or a storage device. Note that data being processed is temporarily stored in a storage device such as a RAM.

101 Editing Support Processing Unit 102 Checking Unit 103 Controlling Unit 104 Check Data Storage Unit 105 Data Storage Unit 106 Reference Data Storage Unit

Claims (12)

When a plurality of operations each including an operation location and an operation or state at the operation location are input by specifying a work order, a step of receiving input data of the plurality of operations;
The plurality of data included in the input data according to check data stored in the data storage unit and associated with the first operation or state and the second operation or state paired with the first operation or state A determination step of determining whether the operation for the first operation or state and the operation for the second operation or state are included in the same operation location;
When only one of the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state is included in the plurality of works for the same operation place, or the first operation for the same operation place Outputting an error if the number of operations for an operation or state does not match the number of operations for the second operation or state;
Is a work procedure table creation support program for causing a computer to execute. In the plurality of operations, determining whether or not the same operation is defined redundantly for the same operation location;
In the plurality of operations, when the same operation is defined redundantly for the same operation location, outputting an error; and
The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 1, further causing the computer to execute the process. A first work, a second work related to the first work, a relative order of the first work and the second work, and a condition indicating whether or not the second work is to be executed. Determining whether or not the first work is included in the plurality of work according to second check data including an association and stored in the data storage unit;
If the first work is included in the plurality of work, a step of setting a search range in the plurality of work from a relative order included in a condition associated with the first work When,
Determining whether the second work associated with the first work is included in the set search range;
Determining whether the determination result as to whether or not the second work is included is appropriate based on whether or not the execution is included in the condition associated with the first work;
If the plurality of operations are not valid, outputting an error; and
The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 1 or 2 for causing the computer to further execute the operation. In the plurality of operations, when the same operation is defined in an overlapping manner, when one of the same operations is specified, the step of displaying the other of the same operations in an identifiable manner is further included. The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 2, which is executed by the program. When the second work is included and the condition associated with the first work indicates execution failure, one of the first work and the second work is selected. The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 3, further causing the computer to execute a step of displaying the other work in an identifiable manner by specifying. Presenting a predetermined input item on a spreadsheet including a work item name, a work location, and an operation or state of the work location;
In accordance with the ruled line display instruction, when the work with the same work item name continues or when the work with the same work location continues, a ruled line enclosing the same work item name range or the same work location range Steps to display;
The work procedure table creation support program according to any one of claims 1 to 5, further causing the computer to execute. In the step of displaying the ruled lines,
The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 6, wherein, in the range of the same work item name or the range of the same work place, a work name other than one work name or one work place is displayed with a set opacity. . The work procedure table creation according to claim 6 or 7 for causing the computer to further execute a step of displaying, as input candidates, input candidates set in advance for input items or data already input for input items Support program. Extracting and displaying reference data stored in association with any one of the operation location, the operation or state at the operation location, and the work item name, and 9. The work procedure table creation support program according to claim 1, which is executed by the computer. When the number of works for the first operation or state matches the number of works for the second operation or state for the same operation location and the number of works is two or more, the first About the work about the operation or state of and the work about the second operation or state,
The work procedure according to claim 2, wherein the step of determining whether or not the same work is defined redundantly for the same operation location is omitted, or the output of an error about the duplicate is suppressed. Table creation support program. When a plurality of operations each including an operation location and an operation or state at the operation location are input by specifying a work order, a step of receiving input data of the plurality of operations;
The plurality of data included in the input data according to check data stored in the data storage unit and associated with the first operation or state and the second operation or state paired with the first operation or state A determination step of determining whether the operation for the first operation or state and the operation for the second operation or state are included in the same operation location;
When only one of the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state is included in the plurality of works for the same operation place, or the first operation for the same operation place Outputting an error if the number of operations for an operation or state does not match the number of operations for the second operation or state;
A work procedure table creation support method executed by a computer. Means for receiving input data of the plurality of operations when a plurality of operations each including an operation location and an operation or state at the operation location are input by specifying a work order;
The plurality of data included in the input data according to check data stored in the data storage unit and associated with the first operation or state and the second operation or state paired with the first operation or state Means for determining whether the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state are included in the same operation location;
When only one of the work for the first operation or state and the work for the second operation or state is included in the plurality of works for the same operation place, or the first operation for the same operation place Means for outputting an error if the number of operations for an operation or state and the number of operations for the second operation or state are inconsistent;
An information processing apparatus.

Images