JP2010224749A - Work process management system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a work process management system that reliably confirms the location of a predetermined work every time each work is completed in a work process where a worker performs the predetermined work in a plurality of locations. <P>SOLUTION: An image pickup camera 3 is fixed at an upper position of the eyes of a worker P so as to include the work position of the worker in an image pickup screen when the worker P is in a posture to see the work position. When the worker P fastens a screw at the work position using a screw driver 2 and completes the work with a predetermined torque, a work completion signal is input from the torque driver 2 in a work management device 4, and the work management device 4 responds to the work completion signal and causes the image pickup camera 3 to image the work position to capture the picked up image. A master image storage part 43 records an image obtained in advance by the worker P who has worked in the same way as a master image. A specification processing part 44 collates all the master images every time the picked up image is input, specifies the master image having the maximum similarity, and specifies the work position where the master image is acquired as the work position where the image was captured. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a work process management system that manages a work process that allows an operator to perform work at each work position on a work object having a plurality of work positions, and in particular, to confirm whether the work is correct or not. The present invention relates to a work process management system that performs process management by specifying the position of the work in a work object every time a person performs the work.

  Conventionally, in a manufacturing process of a mechanical device or the like, a process such as screw tightening is performed by a robot programmed with a work. However, there are cases where it is difficult to perform work by the robot, such as when the work position is inside the work object (see FIG. 1). For example, the movement is limited by the number of joints of the arm of the robot, or the arm may come into contact with a part of the work object, so that the tool attached to the tip of the arm may not reach the work position. Further, in order to perform work by the robot, it is necessary to fix the work object at a predetermined position in a predetermined direction. However, it may be difficult to fix the work object in a predetermined position and direction, such as when a device for moving the work object to an accurate position cannot be prepared. In this case as well, it is difficult to work with the robot.

  When it is difficult to work with a robot, a worker is doing the work. As described above, this includes work that requires flexible work movement response to the work position, such as when work that is difficult for the robot arm to reach is included or when the work object cannot be fixed at a predetermined position with respect to the robot. This is because it is necessary to depend on the worker in the work process.

  However, when workers are allowed to perform work, they can work flexibly with respect to various work positions, but in general, each work cannot always be performed accurately and reliably. Work mistakes can occur. For this reason, it is necessary to perform inspection and quality inspection for the work performed by the worker. For example, in the case of a screw tightening operation, it is necessary to specify the work position and detect the tightening torque in order to eliminate mistakes such as forgetting to tighten the screw or insufficient tightening torque. Conventionally, various work process management systems have been developed in order to efficiently perform inspections for eliminating such work mistakes and reduce the production of defective products due to work mistakes.

  In particular, in screw tightening work, when an operator performs screw tightening work at a screw tightening work position of a work (work object), a system for identifying the work position where the screw tightening work was performed is proposed. Yes. For example, in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-181344, a pair of cameras are provided at a rear position of a work table on which a work is placed, a predetermined camera interval is provided in parallel to the work table, and the optical axis of each camera is provided. When the operator performs a screw tightening operation using a torque driver and a signal is detected from the torque driver that the screw tightening has been performed with a predetermined torque, the signal is Describes a technique for performing the imaging operation of a pair of cameras based on the above and specifying the work position of the screw tightening operation using the captured images of both cameras.

  The technology described in the publication discloses a marker attached to the torque driver, detects the image of each marker from the captured images of a pair of cameras, and the position of the marker on the workbench, that is, the screw tightening work, is based on the principle of stereo vision. This is to specify the position where the operation was performed.

  In JP 2004-258855 A, a transmitter is provided on a tool, while three receivers are provided at different positions. When the work is completed, a work completion signal is transmitted from the transmitter by ultrasonic waves or radio waves. There has been proposed a method of detecting a work position by calculating a distance from each receiver based on a propagation time of the work completion signal transmitted to the receiver.

Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 07-220026 JP 2004-258855 A JP 2008-181344 A

  By the way, in the technique described in the above Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-258855, when the work position is in the inner part of the work object, the propagation time changes due to the ultrasonic wave or radio wave emitted from the tool being blocked by the work object. As a result, an accurate work position may not be detected.

  In addition, for the work to be performed by the worker, for example, when the work position is in the inner part of the work, when the work cannot be fixed at a predetermined position on the work table, or when the work position of the work with respect to the work is not changed variously. It may not be possible. In such a case, according to the technique described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2008-181344, the position of the work (particularly, the work position within the work) with respect to the fixed camera changes, or between the camera and the work. In some cases, an operator may enter and the work position cannot be captured by the camera.

  In addition, when the fixed position and direction of the workpiece on the carriage or work table are different from the predetermined position and direction, the detected work position does not match the work position stored in the storage unit. This is because the work position is stored as a position coordinate on the coordinate axis set on the carriage or work table, and the work can be fixed at the same position and direction as when the work position is stored in the storage unit. This is because it is a premise.

  If the position and direction of the work are detected from the image for detecting the coordinates of the work position, the coordinates of the work position can be converted into position coordinates relative to the work. There are cases where an operator enters and cannot take an image.

  The present invention has been conceived under the circumstances described above, and is accurate and accurate even when the work position is inside the work object or when the work object cannot be fixed in a predetermined position and direction. An object of the present invention is to provide a work process management system capable of reliably specifying a work position.

  In order to solve the above problems, the present invention takes the following technical means.

  The work process management system provided by the first aspect of the present invention has a plurality of work positions, and the worker performs the work on a work object on which a predetermined work at each work position is performed by the worker. A work process management system for identifying a work position of the work every time work is finished, and when the posture of the worker is in a posture to see the work position, the work position of the worker entering the imaging screen An imaging unit fixed at a predetermined position, and an image obtained by imaging each of the work positions by the imaging unit at the completion of each work by causing an operator to perform the predetermined work in advance at each work position of the work object. Storage means for storing the image as a master image, and the imaging means at a predetermined timing after the predetermined work is completed at each work position when the worker performs work on the work object. An imaging control unit that performs an imaging operation and a captured image captured by the imaging unit are collated with a plurality of the master images stored in the storage unit, and a work position where the captured image is captured is specified. And a specifying means.

  According to this configuration, when the worker performs work at each work position of the work target, the image pickup unit performs the image pickup operation every time the work is completed. When the worker is ready to view the work position, the imaging means is fixed at a predetermined position of the worker that enters the imaging screen, so each captured image includes an image of each work position. It is. On the other hand, since the master image is acquired in the same manner as the worker actually performs the work, each captured image is an image similar to any one of all the master images.

  Therefore, each captured image is collated with all the master images, and when a master image that substantially matches each captured image is identified, the work position from which the master image is acquired is identified as the captured work position of each captured image. Is done. If the work position can be specified for all the master images, it can be determined that the work for the work object is completed. If the work position cannot be specified for any of the master images, the work for the work object is completed. It can be determined that there is no.

  According to the present invention, in the process of specifying the work position by collating the images, the captured image and the master image that are close to the image of the work position that the worker is looking at are used, so that the work position is in the field of view of the fixed imaging means. Therefore, it is possible to reliably specify the work position even for a work object that does not enter or a work object for which it is difficult to move the imaging means to the photographing position by the robot.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the specifying means is an image conversion means for converting the captured image into an image under a conversion condition that is set in advance for any one of enlargement, reduction, rotation, and translation, or a combination thereof. Similarity calculating means for calculating the similarity between the converted image converted by the image converting means and each master image, and the captured image is based on the plurality of similarities calculated by the similarity calculating means. The imaged work position is specified.

  According to this configuration, since the captured image is collated with the master image using the converted image obtained by converting the image under the conversion condition of enlargement, reduction, rotation, translation, or a combination thereof, the captured image is captured. Even if the conditions (such as the position of the imaging means and the rotation angle with respect to the optical axis) are not the same as the imaging conditions for capturing the master image, the work position can be accurately identified based on the similarity obtained by comparing the converted image with the master image. can do.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the specifying unit is configured such that the captured image indicates a work position corresponding to a master image having the maximum similarity among a plurality of similarities calculated by the similarity calculating unit. It is specified as an imaged work position.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, each time the similarity is calculated by the similarity calculation means, the specifying means includes a determination means for determining whether or not the similarity exceeds a predetermined threshold value. If the similarity calculated by the determination unit exceeds the predetermined threshold, the work position corresponding to the master image having the similarity is specified as the work position where the captured image is captured. .

  According to this configuration, for any master image, if any similarity exceeds a predetermined threshold before calculating the similarity to the captured image, the work position corresponding to the master image having the similarity is captured. Therefore, the processing time for collating the captured image with a plurality of master images can be shortened.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, an angle detection unit that is attached to the imaging unit and detects an angle in the optical axis direction of the imaging unit with respect to a predetermined reference direction, and for acquiring the master image and the captured image. When the imaging operation of the imaging unit is performed, a detection control unit that detects an angle in the optical axis direction of the imaging unit by the angle detection unit, and a captured image captured by the imaging unit Imaging at the imaging position of the master image based on the angle difference between the angle in the optical axis direction of the imaging means at the time of imaging and the angle in the optical axis direction of the imaging means at the time of imaging of the master image to be compared with the captured image And a second image conversion means for converting the image into substantially the same image as the processed image, wherein the specifying means replaces the converted image converted by the image conversion means with the second image. The converted transformed image switching means for collating with the master image.

  According to this configuration, even if the optical axis direction of the imaging unit when the captured image is captured is different from the optical axis direction of the imaging unit when capturing the master image, the deviation (opening angle) between the optical axis directions of both is different. Based on this, the captured image is converted into an image that is substantially the same as the image captured at the imaging position of the master image, and then collated with the master image. Reliability is improved.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is further provided a projection unit that is attached to the imaging unit and projects a predetermined light image serving as a mark indicating the optical axis direction of the imaging unit with respect to the work object.

  According to this configuration, when an operator performs an operation in a posture in which an optical image is projected at the operation position, it is possible to reliably capture a captured image including the operation position in the imaging screen. As a result, the image at the work position can be captured at substantially the same position in both the master image and the captured image, so that the collation process of the work position in the collation of the captured image and the master image is facilitated. The burden of the position specifying process is reduced, and the reliability of the process result is improved.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the imaging means is located in the vicinity of the eyes of the worker when the optical axis direction of the imaging means is when the worker is performing the predetermined work at each work position. It is fixed in a posture that is substantially the same as the direction of the line of sight.

  According to this configuration, the image picked up by the image pickup unit substantially matches the image seen by the operator's eyes. Usually, since an operator works while visually recognizing the work position, a captured image including the work position can be reliably picked up.

  In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the work is a work using a predetermined tool, and the imaging control means is provided in the tool and outputs a detection signal when the completion of the work is detected. Detection means, and control means for causing the imaging means to perform an imaging operation based on a detection signal output from the detection means.

  According to this configuration, since the imaging operation of the captured image is controlled based on the work completion signal output from the tool, the work position when the work is completed can be accurately specified.

  Other features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description given below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

It is a figure for demonstrating 1st Embodiment of the work process management system which concerns on this invention, and has shown the state which the worker is working on a workpiece | work. It is a block diagram of the work process management system shown in FIG. It is a figure for demonstrating the image imaged at the time of work. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the work management process which a control part performs. It is a figure explaining conversion for carrying out image conversion of a picked-up image and collating with a master image. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the specific process which the specific process part of the work process management system which concerns on 1st Embodiment performs. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the specific process which the specific process part of the work process management system which concerns on 2nd Embodiment performs. It is a figure for attaching an inclination sensor to an imaging camera, and explaining a posture of an imaging camera detected by an inclination sensor. It is a block diagram of the work process management system which concerns on 3rd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows an example of the structure for guiding the attitude | position at the time of an imaging of an operator so that the fastening position of each screw of a workpiece | work may be imaged in the substantially same position of a screen.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the drawings. In this embodiment, a screw tightening process will be described as an example.

  1 and 2 are diagrams for explaining a first embodiment of a work process management system according to the present invention. FIG. 1 shows a state where an operator P is performing screw tightening work at a plurality of work positions of a work W using the work process management system 1, and FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the work process management system 1. Show. This work process management system 1 is a system for confirming whether or not the screw tightening work has been performed reliably at each work position of the workpiece W and whether or not the screw tightening work has been appropriately performed. The work process management system 1 includes a tool 2, an imaging camera 3, and a work management device 4.

  The tool 2 is an electric torque driver for performing screw tightening work, and is connected to the work management apparatus 4 by a control cable 5. The torque driver has a built-in torque limiter. When a predetermined torque load is applied to the torque driver, a signal that detects the load is output to the work management device 4 via the control cable 5. The torque limit value of the torque driver is set to the torque value of the driver when the screw tightening is normally performed. Accordingly, when the operator P performs a tightening operation with the tool 2 and a torque of a torque limit value is applied in a predetermined direction, the detection signal from the tool 2 is sent to the operation management device 4 as a screw tightening operation completion signal. Entered. Hereinafter, the detection signal output from the tool 2 is referred to as “operation completion signal”.

  When the operator presses the rotation start switch, the tool 2 starts the rotation of the driver. The timer 2 measures the time from the start of rotation until the torque reaches the torque limit value, and the time measured by the timer. Is shorter than a predetermined time, a determination circuit is provided that determines that the screw is not properly tightened. When it is determined by the determination circuit that the screw is not properly tightened, the tool 2 inputs an error signal to the work management device 4 instead of the work completion signal.

  The connection between the tool 2 and the work management device 4 may be a wireless connection so as not to hinder the work. In addition, the work management device 4 may determine whether or not the screw has been properly tightened. In this case, the work management device 4 is provided with a timer and a determination circuit, and a signal indicating that the rotation start switch has been pressed is input from the tool 2 to the work management device 4. What is necessary is just to measure the time until is input, and to determine whether or not the screw has been properly tightened based on the measured time. In the present embodiment, the tool 2 is an electric torque driver, but may be a manual torque driver. In this case, it is necessary to cause the operator P to operate a switch or the like to generate a signal corresponding to the rotation start signal and input it to the work management device 4.

  The imaging camera 3 is for imaging the work position where the worker P has worked on the workpiece W, and is connected to the work management device 4 by a control cable 6. The imaging camera 3 is fixed to a specific part of the worker P. The fixing position of the imaging camera 3 by the worker P is a position where the optical axis direction L1 of the imaging camera 3 is substantially the direction of the working position when the worker P completes the screw tightening work at each working position. . Usually, when the worker P performs the screw tightening work, the operator P stares at the screw tightening position (working position), and therefore the posture of the head of the worker P with respect to the work position (particularly, the worker with respect to the work position). It is considered that the positional relationship of the peripheral part of the eye of P is stable. In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, the imaging camera 3 is fixed above the eyes of the worker P so that the optical axis direction L1 is substantially the same as the operator's line-of-sight direction L2. Thereby, the worker P can concentrate on the screw tightening work without being aware of having the image pickup camera 3 pick up the work position when the work is completed.

  The imaging camera 3 is fixed with a rubber band or the like like a headlamp, for example. The method of fixing the imaging camera 3 to the worker P is not limited to this, and the worker P may be covered with a helmet to which the imaging camera 3 is attached. The fixed position of the imaging camera 3 is not limited to the upper position of the eyes. For example, it may be an outer position of the eye. In this case, for example, work glasses or goggles to which the imaging camera 3 is attached may be attached to the worker P. When the imaging camera 3 is attached to the worker P, the worker P is allowed to take a working posture with respect to the workpiece W, and the fixed position of the imaging camera 3 is determined while confirming the captured image of the imaging camera 3 in that posture. It is recommended to adjust.

  The imaging camera 3 includes, for example, a charge-coupled device (CCD) imaging element, and imaging (exposure) is controlled by an electronic shutter. The imaging camera 3 is provided with an autofocus function and an auto exposure function, and exposure and focus adjustment are automatically performed at the approximate center in the screen immediately before imaging. The CCD may be either monochrome or color. The monochrome CCD has an advantage of low cost, but the color CCD has an advantage that not only the shape of the work position but also the color component can be used in the work position specifying process using the captured image. Although not shown in FIG. 1, an illumination device may be provided in the imaging camera 3 and the work position may be illuminated with a certain brightness by the illumination device.

  Since the worker P works while visually recognizing the work position, the imaging camera 3 appropriately captures the work position on the work W when the work is completed without making the worker P aware of the imaging of the work position by the imaging camera 3. can do. For example, when the work of tightening four screws N1 to N4 on the workpiece W shown in FIG. 3A, the worker P works while visually recognizing each screw to be worked. Therefore, when the screw N1 is tightened, the image of FIG. 10B is taken, and when the screw N2 is tightened, the image of FIG. 10C is taken and the screw N3 is tightened. When the attaching operation is performed, the image of FIG. 10D is taken, and when the screw N4 is tightened, the image of FIG. Note that the imaging camera 3 does not interfere with the work of the worker P, and only needs to be able to reliably image the work position when the work is completed. For example, the imaging camera 3 is attached to the arm having the tool 2 of the worker P. Also good. Or the method of attaching to the tool 2 is also considered.

  The imaging operation of the imaging camera 3 is controlled by the work management device 4, and when the imaging instruction signal is input from the work management device 4, the imaging camera 3 performs the imaging operation, and image data of the captured image (hereinafter “imaging”). Image data ") is transferred to the work management apparatus 4. The connection between the imaging camera 3 and the work management device 4 may be a wireless connection so as not to hinder the work.

  When a work completion signal is input from the tool 2, the work management device 4 outputs an imaging instruction signal to the imaging camera 3 to perform an imaging operation. At this time, the worker P is looking at the work position of the work W, and the screen of the imaging camera 3 is almost the same as the image that the worker P is looking at. Therefore, the work position is imaged by the imaging camera 3. The work management device 4 recognizes that the screw tightening work has been appropriately performed by inputting the work completion signal, and specifies the work position based on the image captured by the image capturing camera 3 at that time. The work management device 4 determines that the screw tightening work process for the work W has been completed when all the screw tightening work at the work position in the work W has been appropriately performed, and the determination result is displayed on the display unit 45. (See FIG. 2) to inform the operator.

  As shown in FIG. 2, the work management device 4 includes a control unit 41, a work management unit 42, a master image storage unit 43, a specific processing unit 44, a display unit 45, and an operation unit 46.

  The control unit 41 comprehensively controls the operation of the work process management system 1. When a work completion signal is input from the tool 2, the control unit 41 outputs an imaging instruction signal to the imaging camera 3 in response thereto. Data of the image captured by the imaging instruction signal (captured image data) is transferred from the imaging camera 3 to the work management apparatus 4 via the control cable 6, and the captured image data is stored in the memory in the specific processing unit 44. Saved in. The control unit 41 outputs a processing start instruction signal to the specific processing unit 44, and causes the specific processing unit 44 to perform a work position specifying process using a captured image, which will be described later.

  In the present embodiment, when the work position cannot be specified by the specifying processing unit 44, the operator P is informed so and the worker P is urged to redo the screw tightening operation. . When the worker P redoes the screw tightening work, the work position specifying process by the specifying processing unit 44 is not performed, and the worker P is made to input work completion information. In this case, when the worker P re-does the work, the worker P is considered to confirm that the work is as specified when the work is completed. Needless to say, it is based on the idea that it is sufficient to input information on completion of work from the worker P. In addition, by adopting this method, information on completion of work can be quickly input to the control unit 41, and the processing time can be avoided. When the work position cannot be identified again by the specific processing unit 44 In addition, there is an effect that it is possible to avoid the inconvenience that the work process is stagnant due to the contradiction between the judgment of the worker P and the processing result of the specific processing unit 44.

  In addition, the control unit 41 performs a work process in the work management unit 42 based on a processing result signal input from the specific processing unit 44 and an operation signal (work completion information) input from the operation unit 46 by a user operation. Control the management of Specifically, the work management unit 42 manages whether or not the screw tightening work at each work position in the work process is normally completed by using a flag, and the control unit 41 controls the work management unit 42. The setting of the flag (hereinafter referred to as “work completion flag”) is instructed.

  Further, the control unit 41 causes the display unit 45 to display a work status and a message for the worker P. The display of the work status and the message is, for example, an error display based on an error signal from the tool 2 or an error signal from the specific processing unit 44, a display prompting the worker P to redo the work, or a display indicating completion of the work process. is there.

  The work management unit 42 manages the status of each work in the work process. A work position number is assigned to a work position at which work needs to be performed in the work process. The work management unit 42 is provided with the above-described work completion flag for each work position number. When the work completion flag is “on” (for example, “1” in binary data), this indicates that the work at the work position is completed, and the work completion flag is “off” (for binary data, for example, "0") indicates that the work at the work position is incomplete. The control unit 41 sets the all work completion flag of the work management unit 42 to “off” at the start of the work process, and when the work position number where the work has been completed is input from the specific processing unit 44 or the operation unit 46, A command signal for switching the work completion flag of the work position number to “ON” is output to the work management unit 42. The work management unit 42 switches the work completion flag of the work position number designated by this command signal to “ON”.

  The master image storage unit 43 stores master image data to be compared with captured image data in order to specify a work position by the specification processing unit 44. The master image data is data of an image (master image) obtained by causing the worker P to perform the work process of the work W in advance and imaging each work position of the work W with the imaging camera 3. It is stored in association. For example, in the example of FIG. 3, the operator P performs the tightening operation of the screws N1 to N4 on the workpiece W, and is acquired at each work position (b), (c), (d), ( The image data of e) is stored as master image data.

  The idea of the present invention is that each time the worker P completes the work at each work position of the work W, the work position is picked up by the imaging camera 3 from the predetermined position, and the picked-up image is previously taken from the predetermined position to the work position. The image is identified by image matching with the master image obtained by capturing the image, and the work position is specified from the work position number of the master image that can be identified. In the present invention, in order to obtain an image that is substantially the same as the work position that the worker P is viewing during work, the imaging camera 3 is attached to the position near the eyes of the worker P. It is necessary to acquire the master image for performing the same method as the captured image. Therefore, before the worker P actually performs the work process, the same work process is performed to obtain the captured image data at the completion of the work at each work position of the work W, and the captured image data is used as the master image data. And so on. Hereinafter, the work of creating the master image data is referred to as mastering work.

  In addition, if the captured image of each work position and the captured position of the master image are the same, the captured image and the master image at the same work position are the same, but the imaging camera 3 is attached to the worker P. Therefore, in the repeated work process of the workpiece W, the worker P cannot take the same posture when the work is completed at each work position. Deviation occurs. Therefore, in the present embodiment, in the image matching, processing such as enlargement / reduction, rotation, and parallel movement is performed on the captured image so as to improve identification accuracy by image matching with the master image.

  According to the above concept, it is fundamental that the worker in the mastering work and the worker who actually performs the work process are the same, but in the present embodiment, the actual captured image and the master image are not displaced. Since it is unavoidable, both workers do not necessarily have to be the same. In that case, it is preferable to select a worker who is as similar as possible to the worker who actually performs the work process as the worker in the mastering work. Further, when there is a certain regularity in the deviation between the actual captured image and the master image based on the difference between the two workers, it is preferable to perform processing for correcting the deviation in the master image data.

  The specific processing unit 44 collates the captured image data obtained by the imaging of the imaging camera 3 with each master image data stored in the master image storage unit 43, and images which work position the captured image data captures by image matching. It is what specifies whether it is what was done. Hereinafter, the process of collating the captured image data with the master image data and specifying the work position by image matching is referred to as “specification process”. The identification processing unit 44 outputs the work position number of the work position to the control unit 41 when it is possible to identify which work position is captured in the captured image data, and when it cannot be identified, the work position number. Instead, an error signal is output.

  In the identification process, the identification processing unit 44 collates the captured image data at the first work position with all the master image data, but the captured image data at the subsequent work position corresponds to the already identified work position. Since it is not necessary to collate with the master image data to be collated, only the master image data corresponding to the unspecified work position is collated. In other words, the work management unit 42 collates only with the master image data at the work position corresponding to the work position number whose work completion flag is “off”. Thereby, the time required for the specific processing can be shortened. Details of the specific processing performed by the specific processing unit 44 will be described later.

  The display unit 45 displays a work status and a message for the worker P, and is controlled by the control unit 41. The control unit 41 causes the display unit 45 to display the status of each work in the work process according to the state of the work completion flag of the work management unit 42. The display unit 45 displays “work completed” or “work not completed” as the work status for each work position number. In addition, when an error signal is input from the tool 2, the control unit 41 displays a message indicating that the work is inappropriate on the display unit 45 and prompts the worker P to redo the work, and the specific processing unit 44. When an error signal is input from, a message indicating that the work position could not be specified is displayed on the display unit 45, the work position is confirmed by the worker P, and the work position is input from the operation unit 46. Prompt. Further, when all the work completion flags of the work management unit 42 are turned “ON”, the control unit 41 displays a message indicating that all work processes are completed on the display unit 45 and then sends the work W to the worker P. Encourage them to proceed to this process. In addition, you may make it alert | report by an audio | voice alerting | reporting part so that the operator P may notice the message displayed on the display part 45. FIG.

  The operation unit 46 is for the operator P to operate the work management device 4. The operation unit 46 is provided with a start button to be pressed at the start of the work process, and a numeric keypad for the worker P to input a work position number when the identification processing unit 44 cannot identify the work position. It has been.

  Next, a processing procedure in the work process management system 1 will be described with reference to a flowchart shown in FIG.

  FIG. 4 is a flowchart for explaining the work position specifying process performed by the control unit 41. The processing is started when an operation signal is input to the control unit 41 when the operator P presses the start key of the operation unit 46.

  First, all the work completion flags set in the work management unit 42 are initialized to “off” (S1). The display unit 45 displays the work status for all work position numbers as “work not completed”.

  The worker P uses the tool 2 to perform screw tightening work at a work position determined for the work W. When the worker P appropriately completes the screw tightening work at a certain work position, a work completion signal is input from the tool 2 to the control unit 41. However, when the screw tightening operation is not properly performed (for example, when the screw is tightened while being tilted), an error signal is input from the tool 2 to the control unit 41.

  The control unit 41 determines whether an error signal is input (S2). When an error signal is input (S2: YES), a message indicating that the screw tightening operation is inappropriate is displayed on the display unit 45 (S3), and the process returns to step S2. The worker P looks at this message, reviews the screw tightening work that has just been performed, and performs the screw tightening work again. Accordingly, when the screw tightening work is inappropriate, the operator P displays a message to that effect on the display unit 45, so that the screw tightening operation is not performed until the message to that effect disappears on the display unit 45. Will be repeated.

  When no error signal is input (S2: NO), the control unit 41 determines whether or not a work completion signal is input (S4). When the work completion signal is input (S4: YES), an imaging instruction signal is transmitted to the imaging camera 3 (S5). When the work completion signal is not input (S4: NO), the process returns to step S2. That is, the control unit 41 repeats steps S2 to S4 and waits for a work completion signal to be input.

  When the imaging instruction signal is input, the imaging camera 3 performs an imaging operation, and transfers captured image data obtained by the imaging operation to the specific processing unit 44. The control unit 41 causes the specific processing unit 44 to perform specific processing (S6). Details of the specific processing will be described later. The identification processing unit 44 performs identification processing, and outputs a work position number to the control unit 41 when the work position can be specified, and outputs an error signal to the control unit 41 when the work position cannot be specified.

  The control unit 41 determines whether an error signal is input from the specific processing unit 44 (S7). If an error signal is input (S7: YES), a message indicating that the work position could not be specified is displayed on the display unit 45 (S8). The operator P sees this message, confirms the work position, and then inputs the number of the work position where the current work has been performed from the operation unit 46.

  In the present embodiment, the captured image data is collated with all master image data for which the work position is not specified, so that the work position is specified. Therefore, the worker P can perform work at a predetermined work position. Even when the work is not performed in order, the work position can be specified by the specifying process. Therefore, when the work position cannot be specified, a method of repeating the specifying process is also conceivable. However, since the work time is increased due to the repetition process, by inputting the work position number from the worker P, The delay of work process is prevented. Further, the work process management system 1 mainly detects the mistake of the worker P, makes the worker P check the suitability of the work, and advances the work W to the next process. Since it is considered that the worker P confirms the suitability of the work after the error display, it can be said that there is little need to repeat the specific process.

  The control unit 41 waits for the input of the work position number from the operation unit 46 (S9). When the work position number is input (S9: YES), the work management unit 42 is caused to switch the work completion flag of the work position number to “ON” (S11). The display unit 45 displays the work status for the work position number as “work completed”.

  When no error signal is input in step S7 (S7: NO), it is determined whether or not a work position number is input from the specific processing unit 44 (S10). When the work position number is input (S10: YES), the work management unit 42 is caused to switch the work completion flag of the work position number to “ON” (S11). The display unit 45 displays the work status for the work position number as “work completed”. If the work position number has not been input (S10: NO), the process returns to step S7. That is, the control unit 41 repeats steps S7 and S10 and waits for an error signal or a work position number to be input.

  Next, the control unit 41 determines whether or not all the work completion flags of the work management unit 42 are “ON” (S12). If there is a work completion flag that is "off" (S12: NO), the process returns to step S2 and waits for the next work completion signal. When all the work completion flags are “ON” (S12: YES), a message indicating that all work processes are completed is displayed on the display unit 45 (S13), and the process is terminated. The worker P sees this message and advances the workpiece W to the next step.

  Next, the specific processing in the specific processing unit 44 will be described.

  The identification process is a process of searching for a master image that is substantially the same as the captured image of the work position captured in the work process, and identifying the work position number of the master image as the work position where the captured image is captured. In the present embodiment, when the worker P who actually performs the work performs the mastering work, the captured image is captured from substantially the same position as when the master image is captured, and thus both images may be substantially the same image. Is expensive. Then, as in the example of FIG. 3, when the appearance of each tightening work position of the screw of the workpiece W is clearly different, the pattern of each captured image is the master image of the work position different from the work position of each captured image. Since it is completely different from the design, it is possible to find a master image that is substantially identical to the captured image even if the captured image and the master image are collated with the entire image.

  From the viewpoint of processing speed, a method of checking the captured image as it is with the master image can be considered, but the captured image is not exactly the same as the master image corresponding to the captured position. In consideration of accuracy, the captured image is changed by an image conversion method such as enlargement / reduction, rotation, or parallel movement and collated with the master image.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram for describing image conversion for changing a captured image and collating it with a master image. 3A is a master image (same as FIG. 3B) for the tightening operation of the screw N1 in the example of FIG. 3, and FIGS. It is a picked-up image with respect to the fastening operation | work of the screw N1 of the workpiece | work W.

  In the captured image of FIG. 5B, the screw N1, the workpiece W, and the tool 2 are larger than the master image of FIG. This state occurs when the position of the imaging camera 3 is closer to the workpiece W than when the master image is captured. In this case, when the captured image is reduced and converted, it can be matched with the master image of FIG.

  In the captured image of FIG. 10C, the screw N1, the workpiece W, and the tool 2 are rotated clockwise compared to the master image of FIG. This state occurs when the imaging camera 3 rotates clockwise about the optical axis as a rotation axis compared to when the master image is captured. In this case, when the captured image is rotationally converted counterclockwise (in the direction of the arrow in the figure), it can be matched with the master image in FIG.

  In the captured image of FIG. 4D, the screw N1, the workpiece W, and the tool 2 are shifted to the lower right as compared with the master image of FIG. This state occurs when the optical axis of the imaging camera 3 is shifted to the upper left from when the master image is captured. In this case, when the captured image is translated and converted to the upper left (the direction of the arrow in the figure), it can be matched with the master image in FIG.

  Thus, by converting the captured image by combining enlargement / reduction conversion, rotation conversion, and translational conversion, the captured image can be made an image close to the imaging state of the master image, and the similarity to the master image Can be calculated more accurately. Note that when all three types of image conversions of enlargement / reduction, rotation, and parallel movement are combined, the number of combinations becomes enormous, and an image obtained by converting the captured image (hereinafter referred to as “converted image”) and a master image. The number of verifications becomes huge. Therefore, in the present embodiment, conversion conditions such as the types to which image conversion is combined and the conversion parameters for each type (magnification / reduction magnification, rotation angle, parallel movement amount, etc.) are determined in advance by empirical values. Each of the plurality of converted images to be generated is compared with the master image, the maximum value of the index value indicating the similarity between the captured image or the plurality of converted images and the master image is obtained, and the maximum value is the similarity of the captured image with respect to the master image It is said.

  For example, a known normalized cross-correlation coefficient can be used as the index value indicating the degree of similarity between the captured image or the converted image and the master image, but an appropriate arithmetic expression may be defined. For example, as a simple method, a density difference between corresponding pixel positions of the captured image or the converted image and the master image may be obtained, and the total value of the density differences of the entire image may be used as the index value.

  Since a similarity is calculated for each of the plurality of master images collated with the captured image or the converted image, it can be estimated that the master image having the maximum similarity among the similarities matches the captured image. . Assuming that there is a master image that always matches the captured image among the plurality of master images, the work position number corresponding to the master image having the maximum similarity is specified as the work position where the captured image was captured. However, in the present embodiment, in consideration of the accuracy and certainty of the specific processing, the maximum value of the similarity is compared with a predetermined threshold, and when it is equal to or higher than the threshold, the operation of the master image having the maximum similarity is performed. The position number is specified as the work position where the picked-up image is picked up. If the position number is smaller than the threshold, the work position cannot be specified, that is, it is determined as an error.

  Therefore, the specific processing unit 44 calculates the similarity to the captured image for each master image, and if the maximum value of the similarity is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold, the work position number of the master image having the maximum similarity is controlled. When the maximum value of the similarity is smaller than the predetermined threshold value, the reliability of the specific processing result is low, so that an error signal is output to the control unit 41 instead of the work position number.

  In addition, after obtaining the similarity for all master images to be collated with the captured image, the maximum value of the similarity may be obtained, and the master image estimated to match the captured image may be specified from the maximum value. However, when the similarity is calculated in order for each master image, the similarity is compared with a predetermined threshold. If the similarity is equal to or higher than the predetermined threshold, the master image matches the captured image at that time. The master image may be recognized as a master image, and the collation operation may not be performed for other master images. In this case, the time required for the specific processing can be shortened. Further, in this method, when the similarity is not greater than or equal to a predetermined threshold value up to the last master image, an error signal is output to the control unit 41 because it cannot be specified.

  In order to increase the accuracy of matching with the master image, it is only necessary to perform image conversion of the captured image in smaller increments (the number of converted images may be increased), but in this case, the time required for the specific processing becomes longer. Each image conversion may set image conversion conditions so as to include a range of deviation from all possible master images, but in this case as well, the time required for the specific processing increases. Therefore, image conversion conditions (conditions such as the number of combinations of conversion types and conversion pitch in each conversion) should be appropriately determined in consideration of the processing time.

  When a worker different from the worker P who actually works in the work process performs the mastering work, the image shift between the captured image and the master image becomes more prominent. Accordingly, it is necessary to increase the conditions for image conversion of the captured image as compared with the case where the worker P himself performs the mastering work. In this case, a certain regularity may appear in the difference between the captured image and the master image. For example, when the worker P has a habit of working with the face close to the work W, the captured image is often an image enlarged at a constant magnification with respect to the master image (see FIG. 5B). In addition, when the operator who performed the mastering work is fixing the imaging camera 3 to the right side of the forehead and the worker P working in the actual work process fixes the imaging camera 3 in the middle of the forehead, imaging is performed. In many cases, the image is an image shifted by a certain distance to the lower right with respect to the master image (see FIG. 5D). These characteristics become clear as the specific process is repeated. Therefore, each time a specific process is performed, the conditions for image conversion added to the captured image when it matches the master image are stored, and the regularity of the image conversion is analyzed when the specific process is repeated a predetermined number of times. The image conversion condition of the captured image may be changed based on the above.

  It should be noted that when the worker P performs the mastering work immediately before starting the work of the work process, or performs the mastering work during the work for the first work W that has actually started the work of the work process, the worker P Since the mastering work is performed under the same conditions (conditions such as the mounting position of the imaging camera 3 and the work posture) when actually working, it is desirable because the accuracy of the specific processing is increased.

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart for explaining the specific processing performed by the specific processing unit 44. The identification process is started when an instruction for the identification process is issued from the control unit 41 and the captured image data is input from the imaging camera 3.

First, registers and counters for specific processing are initialized (S21). The registers include a register Xmax for obtaining the maximum value of the similarity X and a register n for obtaining the work position number of the master image having the maximum similarity X, both of which are initialized to “0”. The counter includes a counter j that counts the number of conversion conditions for converting the captured image and a counter i that counts the work position number of the master image, both of which are initialized to “1”.

  Next, it is confirmed whether or not the work completion flag F (i) corresponding to the i-th work position is “off” (S22), and if it is “off” (S22: YES), step The process proceeds to S23, and if it is “ON” (S22: NO), the process jumps to Step S31. This is because the master image at the work position for which the work completion flag F (i) is on (master image in which the work position is specified) is not compared with the captured image, and the work completion flag F (i) This is a process for collating with a captured image only for a master image of a work position that is turned off (a master image whose work position is not specified).

  In step S23, master image data corresponding to the i-th work position is prepared. Next, image conversion processing of the captured image data is performed under the jth conversion condition (S24). This image conversion process is a conversion process in which any one of enlargement / reduction conversion, rotation conversion, and translation conversion, or a combination of two or more thereof. The number m of conversion conditions is set in advance, and the conversion amount (magnification / reduction magnification, rotation direction and rotation amount, translation direction and movement amount) in each image conversion process is also set in advance. Note that the conversion amount includes a case where the enlargement / reduction magnification is 1, and the rotation amount and the movement amount are 0 (that is, when the captured image is not substantially converted), for example, the first conversion Conversion conditions of magnification “1”, rotation amount, and movement amount “0” are set in the conditions. Hereinafter, the image data obtained by converting the captured image data (including the case where it is substantially the same as the captured image data) is referred to as converted image data.

  Next, the similarity X between the converted image and the master image corresponding to the i-th work position is calculated (S25). The similarity degree X is, for example, a well-known normalized interconversion coefficient. Next, it is determined whether or not the similarity X is greater than the value of the register Xmax (hereinafter referred to as “maximum similarity Xmax”) (S26). When the similarity X is greater than the maximum similarity Xmax (S26: YES), the similarity X is stored in the register Xmax (S27), and the value of the counter i at this time is stored in the register n of the work position number ( S28). When the similarity X is equal to or less than the maximum similarity Xmax (S26: NO), the process of steps S27 and S28 is skipped and the process proceeds to step S29. Since the similarity degree X calculated for the first converted image should be larger than 0, the similarity degree X is stored in the register Xmax, and the value “1” of the counter i is stored in the register n.

  Next, the value of the counter j is incremented by 1 (S29), and it is determined whether or not the value exceeds the number of conversion conditions (total number of converted images) m (S30). If j ≦ m (S30: NO), the process returns to step S24 in order to compare the next converted image with the master image. That is, steps S24 to S30 are repeated until the planned converted image is compared with all the master images. If the similarity X calculated in step S25 is greater than the maximum similarity Xmax stored in the register Xmax in the loop processing of steps S24 to S30, the similarity X is overwritten in the register Xmax in step S27. Accordingly, when all the converted images are collated with the master image of the work position number n = 1 (step S30: YES), the maximum value of the similarity X with the master image is stored in the register Xmax. Will be stored.

  In step S30, if j> m (S30: YES), the value of the counter i is incremented by 1 (S31), and the value is the maximum value N of the work position number (the total number of tightening operations of the screws of the work W). It is determined whether or not the value exceeds (S32). If i ≦ N (S32: NO), the process returns to step S22 in order to compare the next master image with the converted image of the captured image. Accordingly, the loop processing in steps S22 to S32 compares the captured image data with all the master image data for which the work position is not specified while being converted into the converted image data, and specifies the master image having the maximum similarity X. The

  When i> N (S32: NO), that is, when the comparison with all the master image data is completed while converting the captured image data into the converted image data, whether or not the maximum similarity Xmax is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value Xr. Is determined (S33). When the maximum similarity Xmax is equal to or greater than the predetermined threshold value Xr (S33: YES), the value stored in the register n is output to the control unit 41 as the work position number where the work has been completed (S34), and the specific process is terminated. To do. On the other hand, when the maximum similarity Xmax is smaller than the predetermined threshold value Xr (S33: NO), since the reliability that the master image whose similarity X is the maximum similarity Xmax matches the converted image is low, an error signal is generated. It outputs to the control part 41 (S35), and complete | finishes a specific process.

  Next, the operation of the work process management system 1 will be described.

  In the present embodiment, the identification processing unit 44 identifies a work position by comparing a captured image obtained by imaging a work position in an actual work process with a master image obtained by imaging each work position in advance based on the work completion signal. Since the imaging camera 3 is fixed in the vicinity of the eyes of the worker P so as to be substantially the same as the line-of-sight direction, if the work position can be visually recognized, the work position can be imaged. Since the master image is also captured under substantially the same conditions, even when the work position is inside the workpiece W (see FIG. 1), it is possible to accurately identify the work position by comparing the captured image with the master image. it can.

  In addition, the captured image and the master image are captured with the imaging position and camera orientation of the imaging camera 3 with respect to the workpiece W being substantially the same. Therefore, even when the workpiece W cannot be fixed at a predetermined position and direction, the work position can be accurately identified by comparing the captured image with the master image.

  Moreover, since the imaging camera 3 is picked up by the work completion signal from the tool 2, when the work completion signal of the tool 2 is output, the posture of the worker P looking at the screw tightening work position is stabilized. Therefore, the image of the work result at each work position can be stably acquired. Thereby, since there is little variation in the captured image at each work position, there is little variation in image conversion processing of the captured image, image matching processing with the master image is stable, and the work position can be specified accurately. In addition, since it is prevented from proceeding to the next process unless it is confirmed that all the work at each work position has been completed, work mistakes can be suppressed.

  In the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 6, the captured image data is collated with the master image using the converted image obtained by image conversion under a predetermined conversion condition. As described above, the image included in the master image is used. If the image is distinct from the image included in the master image at another work position, only the captured image may be collated with each master image. That is, in the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 6, the number m of conversion conditions may be “1”, the conversion condition of j = 1 may be “1”, and the conversion conditions of the rotation amount and the movement amount may be “0”.

  Further, when the captured image data and each master image data are compared, the two image data may be binarized or compared after being processed such as blurring.

  Further, since the tool 2 is always shown in the captured image (see FIGS. 3 and 5), the specifying process may be performed using the image of the tool 2 portion. In the flowchart of FIG. 6, image conversion conditions are set in advance, but the image 2 of the tool 2 included in the captured image and the image of the tool 2 included in each master image are compared to determine the conversion condition of the captured image. You may make it collate the conversion image which carried out image conversion on the conversion conditions with each master image. For example, when the captured image is FIG. 5B, the tool 2 is shown large, and therefore the image of the tool 2 in both images matches from the size of the tool 2 in the captured image and the size of the tool 2 in the master image. Thus, the conversion condition of the captured image is obtained, and the captured image is reduced under the conversion condition. Then, by comparing the reduced captured image and each master image, a matching master image can be easily specified.

  In this method, it is necessary to extract an image of the tool 2 in each master image in advance. Further, every time a captured image is acquired, the image of the tool 2 in the captured image must be extracted and compared with the image of the tool 2 in each master image to obtain a conversion condition.

  In addition, when a characteristic image included in the master image is in a specific region in the screen, only the portion of the region may be collated with the captured image and the master image. For example, in the case of the master image in FIG. 5A, when the corners and screw portions of the board have features, the user sets the area Ar in the screen in advance, and the captured image in the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. In the verification of the master image, only the area Ar of both images may be verified. In this case, since the number of data for comparing the captured image and the master image is reduced, the processing time can be shortened.

  The method for specifying the work position by comparing the captured image and the master image described in the first embodiment uses the fact that the captured position of the captured image and the master image for the same work position is substantially the same, and both images are substantially the same. Then, a master image that is estimated to be substantially the same as the captured image in the entire image is specified, and the work position number of the master image is used as the work position number of the captured image. Extract different characteristic images (hereinafter referred to as “characteristic images”) included in the image, search for which characteristic images are included in each captured image, and identify the characteristic images included in each captured image Thus, the work position number corresponding to the feature image may be used as the work position number of the captured image.

  For example, in the example of FIGS. 3B to 3E, a partial image including a corner portion of the substrate and a screw head portion (partial images of regions B1 to B4 in FIG. 3) can be used as a feature image. In FIGS. 5B to 5E, the direction of the image of the tool 2 with respect to the corner portion of the substrate is different, and therefore, when the partial images B1 to B4 are compared with each other, the images are distinctly different characteristic images. .

  This identification method is based on the premise that the imaging camera 3 captures a characteristic subject at each work position, and extracts an image (characteristic image) of the characteristic subject from each master image. The idea is to identify which characteristic subject (that is, which work position) each captured image is captured by searching for which feature image is included. In this identification method, while the identification method described in the first embodiment determines the identity of the captured image and the master image, which of the characteristic objects defined by each work position is the captured image. The way of thinking is different in judging whether the image is taken. For this reason, in this identification method, it is necessary to search for whether or not each captured image includes a feature image (partial image) designated by the user in each master image.

  That is, for each captured image, a window having the same size as the feature image is scanned at a predetermined pitch in the raster scanning direction, for example, and an image (partial image) included in the window is extracted at each scanning position. It is necessary to perform processing for checking the presence or absence of an image having a similarity equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold by comparing the image with a feature image.

  Next, a description will be given of a specific process using the method for searching for a feature image in the captured image. Note that the block diagram of the work process management system according to the second embodiment for performing this specific processing is the same as that of FIG. 2, and other than the image data stored in the master image storage unit 43 and the specific processing performed by the specific processing unit 44. There is no difference. Therefore, only the differences will be described.

  In addition to the master image data, the master image storage unit 43 of the work process management system according to the second embodiment includes image data of feature images designated by the operator for each master image (hereinafter, “feature image data”). I remember.) The feature image may be specified at the time of mastering work, or the feature image of each master image may be automatically specified by image processing.

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart for explaining a specific process performed by the specific processing unit 44 of the work process management system according to the second embodiment.

First, registers and counters for specific processing are initialized (S41). Register Xmax
And register n are the same as those in the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 6, and both are initialized to “0”. Further, the counter j and the counter i are the same as those in the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 6, but in addition to these, a counter that counts the number of times the window having the same size as the feature image in the converted image is scanned in the raster scanning direction. k. Both j and i are set to “1”, but k is initialized to “0”.

  Next, it is confirmed whether or not the work completion flag F (i) corresponding to the i-th work position is “OFF” (S42). If it is “OFF” (S42: YES), step S42 is performed. The process proceeds to S43, and if it is “ON” (S42: NO), the process jumps to Step S59. This process is a process for searching the converted image data only for the feature image data defined by the master image data whose work position is not specified.

  In step S43, feature image data designated by the master image corresponding to the i-th work position is prepared. Next, image conversion processing of the captured image data is performed under the jth conversion condition (S44). The processing content for creating a plurality of converted image data under the conversion conditions set in advance for each captured image data in the loop processing of steps S44 to S53, S57, and S58 is basically the same as the specific processing shown in FIG. .

  Next, the counter k is set to “1” (S45), and an image at the k-th window position (the position of the upper left corner of the converted image when k = 1) is extracted from the converted image (S46). Then, the similarity X (k) between the extracted image (hereinafter referred to as “extracted image”) and the feature image created from the master image corresponding to the i-th work position is calculated (S47). Similarity degree X (k) is a normalized mutual conversion coefficient as in the first embodiment. Next, it is determined whether or not the similarity X (k) is greater than the maximum similarity Xmax (S48). When the similarity X (k) is larger than the maximum similarity Xmax (S48: YES), the similarity X (k) is stored in the register Xmax (S49), and the value of the counter i at this time is set as the work position number. After storing in the register n (S50), the counter k is incremented by 1 (S51). When the similarity X (k) is equal to or less than the maximum similarity Xmax (S48: NO), the process of steps S49 to S51 is skipped and the process proceeds to step S52.

  Next, it is determined whether or not the value of the counter k has exceeded the total number of window scans K (S52). If k ≦ K (S52: NO), the process returns to step S46 to compare the extracted image at the scanning position of the next window with the feature image. If k> K (S52: YES), the process returns to step S53. Transition. That is, the loop process of steps S46 to S52 moves the feature image on the converted image in the raster scanning direction at a predetermined pitch, calculates the similarity between the extracted image extracted from the converted image and the feature image at each scanning position, The scanning position having the maximum similarity is obtained.

  In step S53, it is determined whether or not the maximum similarity Xmax obtained by the loop processing in steps S46 to S52 is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value Xr '. When Xmax ≧ Xr ′ (S53: YES), the similarity X between the converted image and the master image at the work position number n (the number stored in the register n in step S50) obtained by the loop processing in steps S46 to S52. Is calculated (S54). This degree of similarity X is also a normalized mutual conversion coefficient as in the first embodiment. Next, it is determined whether or not the similarity is greater than or equal to a predetermined threshold value Xr (S55). When X ≧ Xr (S55: YES), the value stored in the counter n is output to the control unit 41 as the work position number where the work has been completed (S56), and the specific process is terminated.

  In step S53, when the maximum similarity Xmax obtained by the loop processing in steps S46 to S52 is equal to or greater than the threshold value Xr ′, the converted image data and the master image data are collated, and the work position number is specified by the similarity X of both. It can be said that even if it is estimated that a certain feature image is included in the captured image, there is no possibility that it is estimated that the other feature image is also included in other feature images. Therefore, in order to increase the specific accuracy, instead of performing a search process to determine whether there is another feature image in the converted image, the converted image and the feature image estimated to be included in the converted image are The specified master image is collated with the entire image, and the reliability of the estimation result by the feature image is confirmed.

  Thereby, it is possible to shorten the processing time for all the feature images as compared with the case where the presence / absence of each feature image is searched for on all the converted images. In addition, in order to shorten processing time, you may make it abbreviate | omit the process of step S54, S55.

  Returning to the specific process of FIG. 7, if Xmax <Xr ′ in step S53 (S53: NO) or X <Xr in step S55 (S55: NO), the process proceeds to step S57, and the value of the counter j is set to 1. After the increase, it is determined whether or not the value exceeds the number of conversion conditions (total number of converted images) m (S58). If j ≦ m (S58: NO), the next converted image is compared with the feature image. In order to perform collation, the process returns to step S44. When j> m (S58: YES), the value of the counter i is incremented by 1 (S59), and the value is the maximum value N of the work position number (the screw of the work W). It is determined whether or not the total number of tightening operations has been exceeded (S60).

  If i ≦ N (S60: NO), the process returns to step S42 to compare the feature image generated from the next master image with the converted image. If i> N (S60: YES), That is, processing for confirming the presence or absence of a feature image for each converted image is performed while converting the captured image into a converted image, and if it is determined that there is no feature image in all the converted images, an error signal is output to the control unit 41. (S61), and the specific process ends.

  In the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 7, the similarity X (k) is obtained for all scanning positions on the converted image in the loop processing of steps S46 to S52. If the similarity X (k) calculated at the scanning position is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold value Xr ′, the feature image search process may be terminated, and the process may proceed to steps S54 and S55.

  In the first and second embodiments described above, in order to reduce the image shift from the master image of the captured image due to the imaging position of the imaging camera 3 during actual work being different from the imaging position during mastering work, Image conversion such as enlargement / reduction, rotation, and parallel movement is performed on the image. As shown in FIG. 8, in these image conversions, the imaging position Q of the imaging camera 3 with respect to the subject at the time of mastering work (tightening work position of the screw N of the work W) is the light of the imaging camera 3 in the actual work. It moves back and forth on the axis L1 (see arrow A1), the orientation of the imaging camera 3 rotates around the optical axis L1 (see arrow A2), and the imaging camera 3 is within the plane including the imaging position Q. This assumes a case of moving in parallel (see arrow A3).

  However, generally, the direction of the imaging position Q ′ of the imaging camera 3 during the operation with respect to the tightening operation position of the screw N is greater than that during the mastering operation, as indicated by the one-dot chain line in FIG. There are many cases where the angle of deviation θd deviates from the direction of the imaging position Q. In the case of such a shift in the imaging position, since the imaging surface of the imaging camera 3 during actual work is inclined with respect to the imaging surface of the imaging camera 3 during mastering operation, the master image and the captured image are the same. The captured image is an image obtained by viewing the master image from an angle even when the angle of view is. For example, a circular image in the master image is an oval image in the captured image.

  Therefore, for such a shift in the imaging position, a sensor for detecting the attitude of the imaging camera 3 is provided, and the attitude of the imaging camera 3 when capturing each work position at the time of the mastering work (more precisely, the optical axis) L1 direction) and the posture of the imaging camera 3 when each work position during actual work is imaged is detected, and the difference between the posture of the imaging camera 3 during mastering work and the posture of the imaging camera 3 during actual work is detected. (To be precise, image conversion of each captured image may be performed based on the opening angle θd of the optical axis L1 at both imaging positions).

  As a sensor for detecting the posture of the imaging camera 3, for example, an inclination sensor using gravity or an azimuth sensor using geomagnetism can be used. For example, as shown in FIG. 8, if the biaxial tilt sensor 7 is provided on the upper surface 31 of the housing of the imaging camera 3, the tilt of the orientation of the imaging camera 3 with respect to the reference orientation can be detected. Assuming that the posture in which the upper surface 31 of the imaging camera 3 coincides with the horizontal plane is the reference posture, when the posture of the imaging camera 3 is changed from the reference posture, the direction of the optical axis L1 at the reference posture (hereinafter, this direction is referred to as “reference direction”). .) Is detected by the tilt sensor 7 in the direction of the optical axis L1. Assuming that the inclination angle detected by the inclination sensor 7 at the time of imaging at the imaging position Q is θ1, and the inclination angle detected by the inclination sensor 7 at the time of imaging at the imaging position Q ′ is θ2, the opening angle θd is calculated by calculating the difference between the two. (= | Θ1-θ2 |) is obtained.

  Therefore, if the opening angle θd is obtained from the inclination angle θ1 detected during imaging during the mastering operation and the inclination angle θ2 detected during imaging during the actual operation, and the captured image is converted into an image using the opening angle θd, The captured image can be converted into an image captured at a position approximate to the imaging position at the time of mastering work.

  Next, a work process management system according to the third embodiment using the imaging camera 3 provided with the tilt sensor 7 will be described.

  FIG. 9 is a block diagram for explaining a third embodiment of the work process management system according to the present invention. In the figure, the same or similar elements as those in the block diagram shown in FIG. The work process management system 1 ′ shown in FIG. 1 has a tilt sensor 7 attached to the imaging camera 3 and performs conversion processing using the tilt angles θ 1 and θ 2 detected by the tilt sensor 7 for the captured image data input from the imaging camera 3. It differs from the first and second embodiments described above in that a conversion processing unit 47 is provided.

  The tilt sensor 7 is attached to the imaging camera 3 (see FIG. 8), and detects the tilt angle of the optical axis L1 of the imaging camera 3 with respect to the reference direction. The tilt sensor 7 inputs the detected tilt angle data in the optical axis direction to the work management device 4. At the time of mastering work, when each master image is acquired, the inclination angle θ1 with respect to the reference direction of the optical axis L1 of the imaging camera 3 is detected, and the inclination angle data is input to the work management apparatus 4. Therefore, data of the inclination angle θ1 is attached to each of the plurality of master image data stored in the master image storage unit 43 and stored.

  During actual work, the conversion processing unit 47 receives the captured image data from the imaging camera 3 and the tilt sensor 7 receives data of the inclination angle θ2 with respect to the reference direction of the optical axis L1 of the imaging camera 3. Is done. When the captured image is collated with the master image, the conversion processing unit 47 calculates the difference between the tilt angle θ1 attached to the master image and the tilt angle θ2 input from the tilt sensor 7 to obtain the opening angle θd. The open angle θd is used to perform image conversion of the captured image and output it to the specific processing unit 44. The converted image input to the specific processing unit 44 corresponds to an image captured when the captured position of the captured image is replaced with a position approximate to the captured position of the master image.

  As in the first embodiment, the identification processing unit 44 performs processing for identifying a master image having the maximum similarity Xmax by comparing a captured image with a plurality of master images whose work positions are not identified. In the third embodiment, a conversion image obtained by converting a captured image into an image captured at a position approximate to the imaging position of the master image is input from the conversion processing unit 47 as an image to be collated with the master image. As described above, the image conversion processing of the captured image is not performed in the specific processing unit 44. In this case, since the deviation between the imaging position of the master image and the position approximate thereto is small, conversion processing such as enlargement / reduction, rotation, and parallel movement for correcting the deviation is omitted. Therefore, the specific processing procedure performed by the specific processing unit 44 is the same as the specific processing procedure shown in FIG. 6 except that steps S24, S29, and S30 are deleted, and the processing content of step S25 is the converted image input from the conversion processing unit 47. The master image similarity X is changed to the calculation process.

  In the third embodiment, the processing of the conversion processing unit 47 may be performed by the specific processing unit 44 as in the first embodiment. Further, instead of the captured image, the master image may be converted into an image captured at the imaging position of the captured image.

  In the third embodiment, since the loop processing of steps S24 to S30 in FIG. 6 in the first embodiment is not performed, the processing time can be shortened. Further, since the captured image is converted into an image captured at the imaging position of the master image, the difference between the similarity X of the master image acquired at the work position of the captured image and the similarity X of the other master images is the first. It becomes more prominent than the embodiment, and the certainty of the master image corresponding to the work position of the captured image can be improved.

  In the first to third embodiments, when the same worker P works during the mastering work and the actual work, the imaging position of the imaging camera 3 is shifted, while the worker P is almost determined. Since it is considered that there is a certain range for the deviation, image conversion of the captured image is performed within the deviation range, and the deviation between the captured image and the master image is made as much as possible. The similarity is calculated by calculating the similarity between the two images.

  When the similarity X is calculated by comparing the captured image with the master image in the entire image, the positional deviation between both images of a specific image (a characteristic image such as a screw) that greatly affects the similarity X is possible. The smaller one is preferable. However, in the first to third embodiments, only the imaging camera 3 is attached to the worker P. Therefore, the worker P has a subject (particularly, a screw that becomes a characteristic image in the screen of the imaging camera 3). It is impossible to know how the image of the tightening position is captured.

  Next, a description will be given of a configuration in which a subject (such as a screw tightening position) that gives a characteristic image of each work position is imaged at substantially the same position on the screen during the mastering work and the actual work.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a configuration that guides the posture of the worker P at the time of imaging so that the tightening position of each screw of the workpiece W is imaged at substantially the same position on the screen.

In the configuration shown in the figure, a projector 8 is attached to the imaging camera 3, and a circular light image S is projected from the projector 8 toward the work position of the workpiece W. In the optical image S, mark lines S _{1 to} S ₄ that intersect with the circumference are provided at four locations, top, bottom, left, and right, so that the operator P can estimate the center O of the optical image S. Then, a position Q that is a predetermined distance D away from the working position of the workpiece W to be imaged (the tightening position of the screw N in FIG. 10) on the optical axis L1 of the imaging camera 3 is set as the imaging position of the imaging camera 3. Then, the projector 8 is adjusted so that the optical axis L3 of the projector 8 intersects with the optical axis L1 of the imaging camera 3, and the optical image S is formed at the intersecting position.

  When the imaging camera 3 is located behind the imaging position Q, the optical image S is projected onto the work W at a position shifted downward from the tightening position of the screw N, and the size of the optical image S increases. On the other hand, when the imaging camera 3 is in front of the imaging position Q, the optical image S is projected on the workpiece W at a position shifted upward from the tightening position of the screw N, and the size of the optical image S is reduced. . However, in the tightening operation of the screw N repeated by the same worker P at the same work position, the range of change in the distance from the workpiece W to the projector 8 based on the change in the work posture is considered to be close to the distance D. Thus, the position and size of the light image S projected onto the workpiece W do not change significantly significantly with respect to the state of FIG.

  Therefore, the worker P captures an image in which the work position is arranged at substantially the center of the screen by the imaging camera 3 by working in a posture in which the work position on the work W is the center O of the optical image S. Can do. Since such an imaging operation is performed in the same way during the mastering work and the actual work, the master image and the captured image at the same work position are images in which the work position is imprinted at the center, and both images Verification becomes easy.

  Since the optical image S serves as a mark for determining the imaging position Q of the imaging camera 3 with respect to the subject (screw tightening position), the shape and size are appropriately determined so as to achieve the purpose. That's fine. Further, since the work position is illuminated by the light from the projector 8, the exposure time of the imaging camera 3 can be shortened, and the blur due to the movement of the worker P can be reduced. In addition, since the work position becomes bright, it becomes easier to work.

  While the work position is imaged in the state shown in FIG. 10 during the mastering work, when the imaging camera 3 is closer to the work W side than the imaging position Q in the actual work, the image of the work position in the captured image ( Specifically, the screw head image) is larger than the master image, but the optical image S is smaller. Therefore, when working closer to the workpiece W than during the mastering work, if the captured image is reduced and converted, the image at the work position approaches the master image, but the light image S is greatly deviated from the master image. In order to avoid this inconvenience, it is preferable to exclude the portion of the light image S in the calculation of the similarity degree X.

  The size of the optical image S in the captured image is proportional to the distance between the imaging camera 3 and the workpiece W. Accordingly, the diameter of the image of the optical image S is calculated from the captured image, and the captured image is subjected to enlargement conversion or reduction conversion based on the difference from the diameter of the optical image S in the master image. Enlargement or reduction conversion can be omitted from image conversion (see step S24 in the flowchart of FIG. 6). Moreover, when the imaging camera 3 rotates around the optical axis L1, the shape of the image of the optical image S also becomes a shape rotated in the same direction. Therefore, the rotation angle of the image of the optical image S is calculated from the captured image, and the captured image is converted by rotating the captured image in the opposite direction at the same angle, thereby converting the captured image in the specific process (see step S24 in the flowchart of FIG. 6). Rotation conversion can be omitted.

  Note that the position and size of the optical image S projected on the workpiece W vary depending on the distance between the workpiece W and the imaging camera 3. When the imaging camera 3 is in the vicinity of the predetermined imaging position Q, the optical image S is clearly imaged with a predetermined size on the workpiece W, and when the imaging camera 3 is largely deviated from the imaging position Q, the optical image projected on the workpiece W Since the size of S becomes too small or too large than the predetermined size and the projected image becomes unclear, the light image S is clearly given to the operator P on the workpiece W. You may make it adjust work posture (especially posture of a head) so that it may project by size. As a result, the imaging camera 3 can be adjusted to the predetermined imaging position Q, and almost the same master image and captured image can be stably acquired, and image deviation between the captured image and the master image is made as much as possible. Can be small.

  In the above embodiment, the work completion signal from the tool 2 is used, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, when the tool 2 does not have a function capable of outputting a work completion signal, the tool 2 may be provided with a switch for inputting the work completion signal to the work management device 4. The worker P can input a work completion signal to the work management device 4 by pressing this switch when the work is completed. In addition, the switch may be provided separately from the tool 2, and the operator P may press the switch with a hand opposite to the hand holding the tool 2. In these cases, the signal input from the switch to the work management apparatus 4 functions as a signal to input the imaging timing of the imaging camera 3 to the work management apparatus 4 rather than the input of the work completion.

  The timing at which the control device 41 inputs the imaging instruction signal to the imaging camera 3 is not limited to when the work completion signal from the tool 2 is input. It is only necessary to take an image when the worker P is visually recognizing the work position, and it is not always necessary to match the image pickup timing with the work completion timing. For example, when the tool 2 is an electric torque driver, the operator P only has to insert the screw N into the screw hole, place the tip of the torque driver in the groove at the head of the screw N, and press the start switch, so that the work is completed. It is more likely that the work position is visually recognized when the start switch is pressed than when the start switch is pressed. In such a case, a timing signal is input from the tool 2 to the control device 41 when the start switch is pressed, and the control device 41 sends an imaging instruction signal in response to the input of the timing signal. You may make it input into.

  Also, in this case, the work position can be specified when the start switch is pushed, not after the work is completed. Therefore, even when it is necessary to change the tightening torque depending on the work position, it is possible to specify the work position at the start of the work and change the tightening torque according to the work position.

  In the above-described embodiment, the case of screw tightening work has been described. However, the present invention is not limited to this. Can be applied. Even in these cases, a work completion signal may be input to the work management apparatus 4 from each tool, or a separate switch may be provided so that the work completion signal is input to the work management apparatus 4 by the switch. Good.

  Further, the present invention can be applied even to work that does not use tools. For example, in the inspection for checking the tightening condition of the bolt, the operator P performs the operation while visually observing the operation position. Therefore, if the operation completion signal is input to the operation management device 4 by a separately provided switch, the present invention is Can be applied.

  The work process management system according to the present invention is not limited to the embodiment described above. The specific configuration of each part of the work process management system according to the present invention can be varied in design in various ways.

1,1 'Work process management system 2 Tool (detection means)
3 Imaging camera (imaging means)
4 work management device 41 control unit (imaging control means, detection control means)
42 Work management unit 43 Master image storage unit (storage means)
44 Identification processing unit (identification means, image conversion means, similarity calculation means, discrimination means)
45 Display unit 46 Operation unit 47 Conversion processing unit (second image conversion means)
5, 6 Control cable 7 Tilt sensor (angle detection means)
8 Projector (projection means)
P Worker W Work N, N1, N2, N3, N4 Screw S Optical image

Claims (8)

Work process management for identifying a work position of a work object having a plurality of work positions and having a predetermined work performed at each work position by the worker each time the worker completes the work. A system,
When the posture of the worker becomes a posture to see the work position, the imaging means fixed at a predetermined position of the worker where the work position enters the imaging screen;
Storage means for preliminarily making an operator perform the predetermined work at each work position of the work object, and storing, as a master image, an image obtained by capturing each work position by the imaging means when each work is completed;
An imaging control means for causing the imaging means to perform an imaging operation at a predetermined timing after the predetermined work is completed at each work position when the worker performs an operation on the work object;
A specifying unit that compares a captured image captured by the imaging unit with a plurality of the master images stored in the storage unit to identify a work position at which the captured image is captured;
A work process management system comprising: The specifying means is:
Image conversion means for converting the captured image into an image under a conversion condition that is set in advance in any one of enlargement, reduction, rotation, and parallel movement, or a combination thereof;
Similarity calculating means for calculating the similarity between the converted image converted by the image converting means and each master image,
The work process management system according to claim 1, wherein a work position where the captured image is captured is specified based on a plurality of similarities calculated by the similarity calculation unit.   The specifying unit specifies a work position corresponding to a master image having the maximum similarity among a plurality of similarities calculated by the similarity calculation unit as a work position where the captured image is captured. Item 3. The work process management system according to Item 2. The specifying means is:
Each time the similarity is calculated by the similarity calculation means, further comprises a determination means for determining whether or not the similarity exceeds a predetermined threshold,
The work position corresponding to the master image having the similarity is specified as the work position where the captured image is captured when the similarity calculated by the determination unit exceeds the predetermined threshold. 2. The work process management system according to 2. An angle detection means attached to the imaging means for detecting the angle of the imaging means in the optical axis direction with respect to a predetermined reference direction;
A detection control unit that detects an angle of the imaging unit in the optical axis direction by the angle detection unit when an imaging operation of the imaging unit is performed to acquire the master image and the captured image;
The angle of the optical axis direction of the imaging means when the captured image is captured by the imaging means and the angle of the optical axis direction of the imaging means when capturing the master image to be compared with the captured image Second image conversion means for converting the image captured at the imaging position of the master image into an image substantially the same as the image captured based on the angular difference of
5. The identification unit according to claim 2, wherein the specifying unit collates the converted image converted by the second image converting unit with the master image instead of the converted image converted by the image converting unit. Work process management system.   6. The projector according to claim 1, further comprising a projection unit that is attached to the imaging unit and projects a predetermined light image serving as a mark indicating an optical axis direction of the imaging unit with respect to the work object. Work process management system.   The image pickup means is positioned in the vicinity of the eyes of the worker so that the optical axis direction of the image pickup means is substantially the same as the direction of the line of sight when the worker is performing the predetermined work at each work position. The work process management system according to claim 1, which is fixed. The operation is an operation using a predetermined tool,
The imaging control means is provided on the tool, and when detecting completion of the work, the imaging control means outputs a detection signal thereof, and performs an imaging operation of the imaging means based on the detection signal output from the detection means Including control means,
The work process management system according to claim 1.

Images