[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

JP2001179608A - Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same - Google Patents

Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same

Info

Publication number
JP2001179608A
JP2001179608A JP36401999A JP36401999A JP2001179608A JP 2001179608 A JP2001179608 A JP 2001179608A JP 36401999 A JP36401999 A JP 36401999A JP 36401999 A JP36401999 A JP 36401999A JP 2001179608 A JP2001179608 A JP 2001179608A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
polishing
polishing pad
hardness
oxide film
pad
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP36401999A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masaaki Shimagaki
昌明 島垣
Naoshi Minamiguchi
尚士 南口
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toray Industries Inc
Original Assignee
Toray Industries Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toray Industries Inc filed Critical Toray Industries Inc
Priority to JP36401999A priority Critical patent/JP2001179608A/en
Publication of JP2001179608A publication Critical patent/JP2001179608A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
  • Mechanical Treatment Of Semiconductor (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To deposit less dust on the surface of a polished material. SOLUTION: A polishing pad comprises a volume swelling percentage of 2.0% or more and a D-hardness of 60 or more. This polishing device and polishing method is characterized by using the above polishing pad.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は加工砥粒を含む研磨
液を供給しながら及びまたは砥粒を含まない研磨液を供
給しながら、被加工物を回転する弾性パッドに押しつ
け、相対運動を行わせながら、被加工物表面の凹凸の凸
の部分を研磨材で優先的に研磨する化学機械研磨(CM
P)に用いられる研磨パッドおよびそれを用いた研磨装
置および研磨方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention presses a workpiece against a rotating elastic pad while supplying a polishing liquid containing working abrasive grains and / or supplying a polishing liquid containing no abrasive grains to perform relative motion. Chemical-mechanical polishing (CM) that preferentially grinds the convex part of the irregularities on the surface of the workpiece
The present invention relates to a polishing pad used in P), a polishing apparatus and a polishing method using the same.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】高度に集積度を増した半導体を製造する
に当たり多層配線を実現するためには、絶縁膜の表面を
完全に平坦化する必要がある。これまでに、この平坦化
法の代表的な技術として、SOG (Spin-On-Glass )
法や、エッチバック法(P.Elikins,K.Reinhardt,and R.
Layer,"A planarization process for double metalCMO
Susing Spin-on Glass as a sacrificial layer,"Proce
eding of 3rd InternationalIEEE VMIC Conf.,100(198
6))、そして、リフトオフ法(K.Ehara,T.Morimoto,S.M
uramoto,and S.Matsuo,"Planar Interconnection Techn
ology for LSI FabricationUtilizing Lift-off Proces
s",J.Electrochem Soc.,Vol.131,No.2,419(1984).)な
どが検討されてきた。SOG 法に関して、これはSO
G 膜の流動性を利用した平坦化法であるが、これ自身
で完全平坦化を実施することは不可能である。また、エ
ッチバック法は、もっとも多く使われている技術である
が、レジストと絶縁膜とを同時にエッチングすることに
よるダスト発生の問題があり、ダスト管理の点で容易な
技術ではない。そして、リフトオフ法は、使用するステ
ンシル材がリフトオフ時に完全に溶解しないためにリフ
トオフできないなどの問題を生じ、制御性や歩留りが不
完全なため、実用化に至っていない。そこでCMP法が
近年注目されてきた。これは被加工物を回転する弾性パ
ッドに押しつけ、相対運動を行わせながら、被加工物表
面の凹凸の凸の部分を研磨パッドで優先的に研磨する方
法であり、プロセスの簡易性から今では広く利用されて
いる。
2. Description of the Related Art In order to realize a multi-layer wiring in manufacturing a semiconductor with a high degree of integration, it is necessary to completely flatten the surface of an insulating film. So far, SOG (Spin-On-Glass) has been used as a typical technique for this planarization method.
Method and etchback method (P. Elikins, K. Reinhardt, and R.
Layer, "A planarization process for double metalCMO
Susing Spin-on Glass as a sacrificial layer, "Proce
eding of 3rd International IEEE VMIC Conf., 100 (198
6)) and the lift-off method (K. Ehara, T. Morimoto, SM
uramoto, and S.Matsuo, "Planar Interconnection Techn
ology for LSI FabricationUtilizing Lift-off Proces
s ", J. Electrochem Soc., Vol. 131, No. 2, 419 (1984)) and the like.
Although this is a flattening method utilizing the fluidity of the G film, it is impossible to perform complete flattening by itself. The etch-back method is the most frequently used technique, but has a problem of dust generation due to simultaneous etching of the resist and the insulating film, and is not an easy technique in terms of dust management. Then, the lift-off method has a problem that the stencil material used cannot be lifted off because it is not completely dissolved at the time of lift-off, and the controllability and the yield are incomplete. Therefore, the CMP method has recently attracted attention. This is a method of pressing a workpiece against a rotating elastic pad and performing preferential polishing with a polishing pad on the surface of the workpiece with relative movement while performing relative movement. Widely used.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら懸かるC
MP法において、被研磨物表面に発生する、スクラッチ
傷、ダストの付着、グローバル平坦性不良等の問題が挙
げられる。例えば層間絶縁膜等の被研磨面にこのような
ダストの付着やスクラッチ傷が発生すると、後工程でこ
の上にAl 系金属等による配線を形成した場合に、段
切れ等が発生し、エレクトロマイグレーション耐性の劣
化等の信頼性の低下が発生するおそれがある。またHD
D (Hard DiskDrive)用非磁性基板等の研磨においてド
ロップアウト等、再生信号欠落が発生する原因となる。
スクラッチ傷の発生は、研磨粒子の分散不良による凝集
塊に起因するものと考えられている。特に、金属膜のC
MPに用いられる、研磨粒子としてアルミナを採用した
研磨スラリは分散性が悪く、スクラッチ傷を完全に防止
するに至っていない。ダストの付着に関してはその原因
さえよくわかっていないのが現状である。常識的にはグ
ローバル平坦性を良くするためには硬質の研磨パッドが
望ましいが、逆にダストの付着やスクラッチ傷が起こり
易くなるために、両者を両立することはできないと考え
られている。
[0007] However, the C
In the MP method, there are problems such as scratches, adhesion of dust, and poor global flatness, which occur on the surface of the object to be polished. For example, if such dust adheres or scratches occur on the surface to be polished such as an interlayer insulating film, when a wiring made of an Al-based metal or the like is formed thereon in a later step, a step breakage or the like occurs, resulting in electromigration. There is a possibility that a decrease in reliability such as deterioration of resistance may occur. Also HD
When polishing a non-magnetic substrate for D (Hard Disk Drive) or the like, a dropout or the like may cause a loss of a reproduced signal.
It is considered that the occurrence of scratches is caused by agglomerates due to poor dispersion of the abrasive particles. In particular, C of the metal film
Polishing slurries used for MP and employing alumina as the polishing particles have poor dispersibility and have not yet completely prevented scratches. At present, the cause of dust adhesion is not well understood. It is common sense that a hard polishing pad is desirable to improve global flatness, but conversely, it is considered that both can not be compatible because dust tends to adhere and scratches are likely to occur.

【0004】本発明は上述した問題点の中で特に被研磨
物表面へのダスト付着性を少なくすることをその課題と
する。
[0004] It is an object of the present invention to reduce dust adhesion to the surface of an object to be polished, among the above-mentioned problems.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決するた
め、本発明は、下記の構成を有する。体積膨潤率が2.
0%以上であることを特徴とする研磨用パッド。D硬度
が、60以上であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の研
磨用パッド。上記研磨用パッドを用いることを特徴とす
る研磨装置及び研磨方法である。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention has the following arrangement. 1. Volume swelling ratio is 2.
A polishing pad characterized by being at least 0%. The polishing pad according to claim 1, wherein the D hardness is 60 or more. A polishing apparatus and a polishing method using the polishing pad.

【0006】[0006]

【発明の実施の形態】体積膨潤率が高いことによって、
ダスト付着が抑えられる。体積膨張率とは、水中に浸漬
したときの体積の変化を表し、詳しくは(体積膨張率の
測定)の項で述べるとおりである。この値は、2.0%
よりも低いと、研磨パッド表面の濡れ性が不良となり、
詳細なメカニズムはわからないが被研磨物表面へのダス
ト付着が多くなる。2.0%以上が好ましく、5.0%
程度が更に好ましい。高くなりすぎると今度は、研磨の
最中にも研磨パッドの膨潤が起こり、研磨パッド表面の
平坦性が損なわれることで、研磨速度のばらつきが大き
くなり好ましくない。更に体積膨潤率が大きい場合は研
磨パッド自身の強度が研磨中に大きく劣化するため良く
ない。最大でも、15%以下が好ましく、通常は10%
以下が好ましい。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The high volume swelling ratio
Dust adhesion is suppressed. The volume expansion coefficient represents a change in volume when immersed in water, and is as described in detail in (Measurement of volume expansion coefficient). This value is 2.0%
If lower, the wettability of the polishing pad surface will be poor,
Although the detailed mechanism is unknown, dust adheres to the surface of the workpiece. 2.0% or more is preferred, and 5.0%
The degree is more preferred. If the temperature is too high, the polishing pad swells during polishing, and the flatness of the polishing pad surface is impaired. Further, when the volume swelling ratio is large, the strength of the polishing pad itself deteriorates greatly during polishing, which is not good. At most, 15% or less is preferable, and usually 10%
The following is preferred.

【0007】体積膨潤率をこの範囲にするためには、例
えば以下の方法が利用できるが、この方法に限らない。
In order to set the volume swelling ratio in this range, for example, the following method can be used, but it is not limited to this method.

【0008】研磨パッドを構成する樹脂(以下マトリッ
クスと言い換える)としては、ポリアミド系、ポリアク
リル系、ポリオレフィン系、ポリビニル系、アイオノマ
ー系、ポリカーボネート系、ポリアセタール系などの熱
可塑性樹脂、ポリウレタン系、エポキシ系、フェノール
系などの熱硬化性樹脂を用いることができる。これらの
樹脂の混合体(アロイ化も含む)や、共重合、グラフ
ト、変性品などの改質技術をも用いることができる。本
発明において研磨パッドを構成する樹脂は、所望の硬
度、弾性率、耐摩耗性を基礎に、適宜選択すればよい。
[0008] The resin constituting the polishing pad (hereinafter referred to as a matrix) includes thermoplastic resins such as polyamide, polyacryl, polyolefin, polyvinyl, ionomer, polycarbonate, and polyacetal, polyurethane, and epoxy. And a phenol-based thermosetting resin can be used. Mixtures of these resins (including alloying) and modification techniques such as copolymerization, grafting, and modified products can also be used. In the present invention, the resin constituting the polishing pad may be appropriately selected based on desired hardness, elastic modulus, and wear resistance.

【0009】本発明の研磨パッドにおいては必要に応じ
て親水性の高分子が使用される。親水性の高分子につい
ては、たとえば、セルロース系、アクリル系、アラミド
系、ポリアミド系、デンプン系の樹脂もしくはその樹脂
を主成分とする架橋体や共重合体を用いることができ
る。市販されているものにも各種ポリアルキレングルコ
ール、ポリビニルビニリドン、ポリビニアルコール、ポ
リ酢酸ビニル等のような水溶性高分子や、水には不溶性
のキトサン、ポリビニルポリビニリドンや、ポリビニル
ポリビニリドン/ビニルイミダゾール共重合体、高吸水
性樹脂、パルプ、紙、セルロースエステルイオン交換用
の各種荷電付与したセルロースなどがあり、これらを利
用することができる。マトリックスとのなじみを改善す
るためにあらかじめ表面を改質処理することも可能であ
る。
In the polishing pad of the present invention, a hydrophilic polymer is used if necessary. As the hydrophilic polymer, for example, a cellulose-based, acrylic-based, aramid-based, polyamide-based, or starch-based resin, or a crosslinked product or copolymer containing the resin as a main component can be used. Commercially available products include water-soluble polymers such as various polyalkylene glycols, polyvinyl vinylidone, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinyl acetate, and water-insoluble chitosan, polyvinyl polyvinylidone, and polyvinyl polyvinyl. There are a lidone / vinyl imidazole copolymer, a superabsorbent resin, pulp, paper, and various charged celluloses for cellulose ester ion exchange, and these can be used. It is also possible to modify the surface in advance to improve the compatibility with the matrix.

【0010】親水性の高分子の形状は、粒子状、不織布
または織物状が取り扱いやすく好ましい。粒子の直径
は、500μm以下が好ましく、100μm以下がさら
に好適に使われる。径が大きいと、マトリックスからの
離脱が多くなり好ましくない。不織布または織物状を形
成する繊維は、中空糸状であるとマトリックスの中空部
への侵入を制御しにくいが中空糸状でもかまわない。
The shape of the hydrophilic polymer is preferably in the form of particles, a nonwoven fabric or a woven fabric because it is easy to handle. The diameter of the particles is preferably 500 μm or less, and more preferably 100 μm or less. If the diameter is large, separation from the matrix increases, which is not preferable. When the fibers forming the nonwoven fabric or the woven fabric are in the form of a hollow fiber, it is difficult to control the invasion of the matrix into the hollow portion, but the fiber may be in the form of a hollow fiber.

【0011】またドメイン構造の集合体が研磨パッド表
面に占める割合、即ち表面密度は、マトリックスによっ
ても変化するが、水分吸収率が高いポリアミド系樹脂や
ポリウレタン系の樹脂では少量でよいが、ポリメチルメ
タクリレートのようなポリアクリル系樹脂、ポリイミド
などでは高く設定する必要がある。一般的には、5%〜5
0%が好適に使われる領域ではあるが、各々の樹脂の組
み合わせで適宜最適値を設定する必要がある。この作業
は当業者にとっては容易に行える。この場合も表面密度
が高くなれば研磨パッドの物理物性が弱く、もろくなる
傾向があり、また研磨特性、例えばディッシングやエロ
ージョンが起きやすく、悪くなる傾向がある。
The proportion of the aggregate of the domain structure occupying the polishing pad surface, that is, the surface density varies depending on the matrix. A small amount may be used for a polyamide resin or a polyurethane resin having a high water absorption rate. In the case of polyacrylic resin such as methacrylate, polyimide, etc., it is necessary to set a higher value. Generally, 5% to 5%
Although 0% is a region that is preferably used, it is necessary to appropriately set an optimum value for each combination of resins. This operation can be easily performed by those skilled in the art. Also in this case, if the surface density increases, the physical properties of the polishing pad tend to be weak and brittle, and the polishing characteristics such as dishing and erosion tend to occur and deteriorate.

【0012】研磨パッドの成形方法としては、マトリッ
クスと親水性でかつ水不溶性の高分子を、あらかじめコ
ンパウンド化して熱圧縮成型することもできるし、溶融
押し出し成形することもできる。インジェクションプレ
スなどの手法も可能である。また、マトリックスのモノ
マー分子を親水性でかつ水不溶性の高分子に含浸後重合
することも可能である。マトリックスがポリウレタンの
ように2液系のものはあらかじめ主剤または硬化剤に親
水性でかつ水不溶性の高分子を混合後に、硬化剤または
主剤を混合し脱泡操作の後に適当な金型へ流し込んで成
形することができるし、その後研削加工を施し研磨パッ
ドの形状に仕上げることも可能である。具体的には各マ
トリックスと親水性でかつ水不溶性の高分子の相溶性や
個々の耐熱性、重合特性、溶融粘度などの物性に依存す
るが、当業者のものにとってその組み合わせを選択する
ことは容易である。本発明の研磨パッドはこの様に製造
方法に関しては公知技術の組み合わせを用いることが可
能である。
As a method for forming a polishing pad, a matrix and a hydrophilic and water-insoluble polymer can be compounded in advance and then subjected to hot compression molding or melt extrusion molding. A method such as an injection press is also possible. It is also possible to polymerize after impregnating the monomer molecules of the matrix with a hydrophilic and water-insoluble polymer. In the case of a two-liquid matrix such as polyurethane, a hydrophilic and water-insoluble polymer is mixed in advance with a main agent or a curing agent, then the curing agent or the main agent is mixed, and after defoaming operation, poured into an appropriate mold. It can be formed, and then it is also possible to perform a grinding process to finish the shape of the polishing pad. Specifically, it depends on the compatibility of each matrix with a hydrophilic and water-insoluble polymer and the individual heat resistance, polymerization properties, physical properties such as melt viscosity, etc. Easy. As for the polishing pad of the present invention, a combination of known techniques can be used for the manufacturing method.

【0013】研磨パッド重量当たり、1〜70重量%の
混合比率で親水性高分子を混合することで体積膨潤率を
2.0%以上にできるが、混合比率が少ないとその効果
は小さく、多いとその効果は大きくなるが、マトリック
スの物性が悪化する場合が多い。即ち、マトリックスの
持つ硬度は下がり、曲げ強度が弱く脆性破壊しやすくな
る。このため、好適には10から60重量%使われ、さ
らに好適には、20から50重量%が用いられる。
The volume swelling ratio can be increased to 2.0% or more by mixing the hydrophilic polymer at a mixing ratio of 1 to 70% by weight based on the weight of the polishing pad, but the effect is small and large when the mixing ratio is small. And its effect is increased, but the physical properties of the matrix often deteriorate. That is, the hardness of the matrix decreases, the bending strength is weak, and the matrix is easily broken. For this reason, 10 to 60% by weight is preferably used, and 20 to 50% by weight is more preferably used.

【0014】本発明における研磨パッドのD硬度は60
以上が好ましい。60を切ると柔らかくなりすぎて、デ
ィッシングやエロージョンが起きやすくなるため、好ま
しくない。更に研磨速度を大きくするためにも、70以
上が好ましく、さらには80以上が好ましい。本発明で
は、更に硬度を上げてもスクラッチ傷やダスト付着の問
題は起きにくいため利用可能である。研磨面への供給と
そこからの排出を促進するなどの目的で、表面に溝や孔
が設けられていることが好ましい。溝の形状としては、
同心円、渦巻き、放射、碁盤目など種々の形状が採用で
きる。溝の断面形状としては四角、三角、半円などの形
状が採用できる。溝の深さは0.1mmから該研磨層の
厚さまでの範囲で、溝の幅は0.1〜5mmの範囲で、
溝のピッチは2〜100mmの範囲で選ぶことができ
る。孔は研磨層を貫通していても良いし、貫通していな
くても良い。孔の直径は0.2〜5mmの範囲で選ぶこ
とができる。また、孔のピッチは2〜100mmの範囲
で選ぶことができる。
The D hardness of the polishing pad of the present invention is 60.
The above is preferred. If it is less than 60, it becomes too soft and dishing and erosion are likely to occur. In order to further increase the polishing rate, it is preferably at least 70, and more preferably at least 80. In the present invention, even if the hardness is further increased, the problem of scratches and dust adhesion hardly occurs, so that it can be used. Grooves or holes are preferably provided on the surface for the purpose of promoting supply to and removal from the polished surface. As the shape of the groove,
Various shapes such as concentric circles, spirals, radiation, and grids can be adopted. As the cross-sectional shape of the groove, a shape such as a square, a triangle, and a semicircle can be adopted. The depth of the groove ranges from 0.1 mm to the thickness of the polishing layer, the width of the groove ranges from 0.1 to 5 mm,
The pitch of the grooves can be selected in the range of 2 to 100 mm. The holes may or may not penetrate the polishing layer. The diameter of the holes can be selected in the range of 0.2-5 mm. The pitch of the holes can be selected in the range of 2 to 100 mm.

【0015】体積膨潤率、D硬度、ダスト付着量、酸化
膜研磨速度の評価は、以下のようにして行った。 (体積膨潤率の測定)厚さ1.0mm〜1.5mmの範
囲、直径38cmの円形の研磨パッドを作成した。(表
面溝加工、ディンプル加工は任意の形状で、無くても良
い。例えば、幅2.0mm、深さ0.5mm、ピッチ1
5mmのいわゆるX-Yグルーブ加工)このパッドを研
磨機(ラップマスターSFT社製、“L/M-15E”)
の定盤にクッション層として、ロデール社製“Suba
400”を貼り、その上に両面接着テープ(3M社製、
“442J”)で張り付けた。ここで両面接着テープは
ほかのものでも良い。旭ダイヤモンド工業(株)のコン
ディショナー(“CMP−M”、直径14.2cm)を
用い、押しつけ圧力0.04MPa、定盤回転数25r
pm、コンディショナー回転数25rpmで同方向に回
転させ、純水を10ml/minで供給しながら5分間
研磨パッドのコンディショニングを行った。研磨機に純
水を100ml/min流しながら研磨パッド上を2分
間洗浄し、ドレッシング面を片面に作成した。厚さ0.
7mm〜1.5mmの範囲に入る試験片を切り出し(5
cm×8cm)両面テープを剥がした後、50℃乾燥機
で24時間乾燥し、サンプルとした。このサンプル5片
を電子比重計(ミラージュ貿易製、“SD-120
L”)を用いて、室温28℃で体積(乾燥体積)を測定
した(測定は該装置の取り扱い説明書に従った)。次
に、水中に各サンプルを移し、50℃、20時間乾燥機
中でインキュベートした。このサンプルを室温(28
℃)にもどした後、各サンプルを1000Gの遠心力を
かけて5秒脱水し、電子比重計(ミラージュ貿易製、
“SD-120L”)を用いて室温28℃で体積(膨潤
体積)を測定し、変化率を下記の式に従って求め、その
平均値をそのサンプルの体積膨潤率とした。
The volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were evaluated as follows. (Measurement of Volume Swelling Ratio) A circular polishing pad having a thickness of 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm and a diameter of 38 cm was prepared. (Surface groove processing and dimple processing are optional and may be omitted. For example, width 2.0 mm, depth 0.5 mm, pitch 1
5mm so-called XY groove processing) This pad is polished with a polishing machine (L / M-15E, manufactured by Lapmaster SFT).
"Suba" manufactured by Rodale Co., Ltd.
400 "and a double-sided adhesive tape (3M,
"442J"). Here, another double-sided adhesive tape may be used. Using a conditioner (“CMP-M”, diameter 14.2 cm) of Asahi Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd., pressing pressure 0.04 MPa, platen rotation speed 25 r
The polishing pad was rotated in the same direction at 25 rpm with a conditioner rotation speed of 25 rpm, and the polishing pad was conditioned for 5 minutes while supplying pure water at 10 ml / min. The polishing pad was washed for 2 minutes while flowing 100 ml / min of pure water through the polishing machine to form a dressing surface on one side. Thickness 0.
A test piece within a range of 7 mm to 1.5 mm was cut out (5.
(cm × 8 cm) After peeling off the double-sided tape, the sample was dried for 24 hours using a 50 ° C. drier to obtain a sample. An electronic hydrometer (Mirage Trading, SD-120)
L ″) was used to measure the volume (dry volume) at room temperature of 28 ° C. (measurement was performed according to the instruction manual for the device). Then, each sample was transferred into water and dried at 50 ° C. for 20 hours. The samples were incubated at room temperature (28
° C), each sample was centrifuged at 1000 G and dehydrated for 5 seconds, and an electronic hydrometer (made by Mirage Trading,
The volume (swelling volume) was measured at room temperature 28 ° C. using “SD-120L”), the rate of change was determined according to the following equation, and the average value was taken as the volume swelling rate of the sample.

【0016】 体積膨潤率=(膨潤体積/乾燥体積)×100-100 (D硬度の測定)厚さ1.0mm〜1.5mmの範囲に
入るサンプル(大きさは1cm角以上)を、D硬度90
以上の表面硬度を有する平面上に置き、JIS規格(硬
さ試験)K6253に準拠した、デュロメーター・タイ
プD(実際には、高分子計器(株)製”アスカーD型硬
度計”)を用い、5点測定しその平均値をD硬度とし
た。測定は室温(25℃)で行った。
Volume swelling ratio = (swelling volume / dry volume) × 100-100 (Measurement of D hardness) A sample (having a size of 1 cm square or more) having a thickness in the range of 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm was subjected to D hardness. 90
Using a durometer type D (actually, “Asker D-type hardness meter” manufactured by Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd.) based on JIS standard (hardness test) K6253 and placed on a plane having the above surface hardness, Five points were measured and the average value was defined as D hardness. The measurement was performed at room temperature (25 ° C.).

【0017】(ダスト付着量の測定)厚さ1.2mm、
直径38cmの円形の研磨パッドを作成し、表面に、幅
2.0mm、深さ0.5mm、ピッチ15mmのいわゆ
るX-Yグルーブ加工(格子状溝加工)を施した。この
パッドを研磨機(ラップマスターSFT社製、“L/M-
15E”)の定盤にクッション層として、ロデール社製
Suba400を貼り、その上に両面接着テープ(3M
社製、“442J”)で張り付けた。旭ダイヤモンド工
業(株)のコンディショナー(“CMP−M”、直径1
4.2cm)を用い、押しつけ圧力0.04MPa、定
盤回転数25rpm、コンディショナー回転数25rp
mで同方向に回転させ、純水を10ml/minで供給
しながら5分間研磨パッドのコンディショニングを行っ
た。研磨機に純水を100ml/min流しながら研磨
パッド上を2分間洗浄し次ぎに、酸化膜付きウェハ(4
インチダミーウェハCZP型、信越化学工業(株))を
研磨機に設置し、説明書記載使用濃度のキャボット社製
スラリー分散液(“SC−1”)を100ml/min
で研磨パッド上に供給しながら、押しつけ圧力0.04
MPa、定盤回転数45rpm、コンディショナー回転
数45rpmで同方向に回転させ、5分間研磨を実施し
た。ウェハ表面を乾かさないようにし、すぐさま純水を
かけながら、ポリビニルアルコールスポンジでウェハ表
面を洗浄し、乾燥圧縮空気を吹き付けて乾燥した。その
後ウェーハ表面ゴミ検査装置(トプコン社製、“WM-
3”)を用いて、直径が0.5μm以上の表面ダスト数
を測定した。本試験方法では、400個以下であれば半
導体生産上問題を生じることが無く合格である。
(Measurement of Dust Adhesion Amount) Thickness 1.2 mm,
A circular polishing pad having a diameter of 38 cm was prepared, and the surface was subjected to so-called XY groove processing (grid-like groove processing) having a width of 2.0 mm, a depth of 0.5 mm, and a pitch of 15 mm. This pad is polished with a polishing machine (Lap Master SFT, "L / M-
15E ″) as a cushion layer, a Suba400 manufactured by Rodale, and a double-sided adhesive tape (3M
"442J"). Conditioner (“CMP-M”, diameter 1) of Asahi Diamond Industry Co., Ltd.
4.2cm), pressing pressure 0.04MPa, platen rotation speed 25rpm, conditioner rotation speed 25rpm
m, the polishing pad was conditioned for 5 minutes while supplying pure water at 10 ml / min. The polishing pad was washed for 2 minutes while flowing pure water at 100 ml / min through the polishing machine, and then the wafer with an oxide film (4
Inch dummy wafer CZP type, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) was set on a polishing machine, and a slurry dispersion liquid (“SC-1”) manufactured by Cabot Co., Ltd. with the concentration described in the instruction manual was 100 ml / min.
Pressing pressure 0.04 while supplying on the polishing pad with
Polishing was performed for 5 minutes by rotating in the same direction at a rotational speed of 45 rpm for the platen and a rotational speed of 45 rpm for the conditioner. The surface of the wafer was not dried, and the surface of the wafer was washed with a polyvinyl alcohol sponge while being immediately sprayed with pure water, and dried by blowing dry compressed air. After that, wafer surface dust inspection equipment (Topcon Co., Ltd., "WM-
3 ″) was used to measure the number of surface dusts having a diameter of 0.5 μm or more. In this test method, if the number was 400 or less, it passed without causing any problem in semiconductor production.

【0018】(酸化膜研磨速度の測定)ウェハ(4イン
チダミーウェハCZP型、信越化学工業(株))表面の
酸化膜の厚みを、あらかじめ大日本スクリーン社製“ラ
ムダエース”(VM−2000)を用いて決められた点
196ポイント測定した。研磨機(ラップマスターSF
T社製、“L/M-15E”)の定盤にクッション層とし
て、ロデール社製“Suba400”を貼り、その上に
両面接着テープ(3M社製、“442J”)で試験すべ
き研磨パッドを張り付けた。旭ダイヤモンド工業(株)
のコンディショナー(“CMP−M”、直径14.2c
m)を用い、押しつけ圧力0.04MPa、定盤回転数
25rpm、コンディショナー回転数25rpmで同方
向に回転させ、純水を10ml/minで供給しながら
5分間研磨パッドのコンディショニングを行った。研磨
機に純水を100ml/min流しながら研磨パッド上
を2分間洗浄し次ぎに、酸化膜厚みを測定し終わった酸
化膜付きウェハを研磨機に設置し、説明書記載使用濃度
のキャボット社製スラリー分散液(“SC−1”)を1
00ml/minで研磨パッド上に供給しながら、押し
つけ所望の圧力、定盤回転数、コンディショナー回転数
で同方向に回転させ、5分間研磨を実施した。ウェハ表
面を乾かさないようにし、すぐさま純水をかけながら、
ポリビニルアルコールスポンジでウェハ表面を洗浄し、
乾燥圧縮空気を吹き付けて乾燥した。この研磨後のウェ
ハ表面の酸化膜の厚みを大日本スクリーン社製“ラムダ
エース”(VM−2000)を用いて決められた点19
6ポイント測定し、各々の点での研磨速度を計算し、そ
の平均値を酸化膜研磨速度とした。以下、実施例によっ
てさらに詳細に説明する。
(Measurement of Oxide Film Polishing Rate) The thickness of the oxide film on the surface of a wafer (4-inch dummy wafer CZP type, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) was previously determined by using "Lambda Ace" (VM-2000) manufactured by Dainippon Screen. 196 points determined by using are measured. Polishing machine (Lap Master SF
Polishing pad to be tested with double-sided adhesive tape (3M, "442J"), with Rodale's "Suba400" applied as a cushion layer to the surface plate of "L / M-15E", manufactured by T. Was stuck. Asahi Diamond Industry Co., Ltd.
Conditioner ("CMP-M", diameter 14.2c)
m), the polishing pad was rotated in the same direction at a pressing pressure of 0.04 MPa, a platen rotation speed of 25 rpm, and a conditioner rotation speed of 25 rpm, and the polishing pad was conditioned for 5 minutes while supplying pure water at 10 ml / min. The polishing pad was washed for 2 minutes while flowing 100 ml / min of pure water through the polishing machine. Then, the wafer with the oxide film whose oxide film thickness had been measured was set in the polishing machine, and the concentration described in the instruction manual was used by Cabot Corporation. Add the slurry dispersion (“SC-1”) to 1
While supplying onto the polishing pad at a rate of 00 ml / min, the plate was pressed and rotated in the same direction at a desired pressure, platen rotation speed and conditioner rotation speed, and polished for 5 minutes. Do not dry the wafer surface.
Clean the wafer surface with a polyvinyl alcohol sponge,
Dry compressed air was blown to dry. The point 19 in which the thickness of the oxide film on the wafer surface after polishing was determined using "Lambda Ace" (VM-2000) manufactured by Dainippon Screen Co., Ltd.
Six points were measured, the polishing rate at each point was calculated, and the average value was taken as the oxide film polishing rate. Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples.

【0019】[0019]

【実施例】実施例1 ポリビニルピロリドン(分子量10000)25部、M
MA(メタクリル酸メチル)/AIBN(アゾイソブチ
ロニトリル)=999/1を75部混合して板間重合
し、得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬度、ダスト付着
量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。この結果、体積膨
潤率5.23%、313個ダストが認められた。またD
硬度は、89度であった。酸化膜研磨速度は179nm
/minであった。被研磨物表面へのダスト付着性を少
なくすることができた。
EXAMPLES Example 1 25 parts of polyvinylpyrrolidone (molecular weight 10,000), M
75 parts of MA (methyl methacrylate) / AIBN (azoisobutyronitrile) = 999/1 are mixed and polymerized between plates, and the obtained resin plate is used for volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, oxide film polishing. Speed measurements were taken. As a result, a volume swelling ratio of 5.23% and 313 dust particles were observed. Also D
The hardness was 89 degrees. Oxide film polishing rate is 179nm
/ Min. It was possible to reduce dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished.

【0020】実施例2 アドバンテック社製濾紙粉末(Eタイプ)を、35重量
%になるように“サーリン”(三井デュポンポリケミカ
ル(株)製、1705)と165℃で1軸混練コンパウンド
化した。3mm長にカットしたペレットを用い、40cm角
の金型を用いて185℃でホットプレス成形を行った。
得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬度、ダスト付着量、
酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。この結果、体積膨潤率
2.23%、254個ダストが認められた。またショア
D硬度は、63度であった。酸化膜研磨速度は32nm
/minであった被研磨物表面へのダスト付着性を少な
くすることができた。
Example 2 Filter paper powder (E type) manufactured by Advantech Co., Ltd. was uniaxially kneaded and compounded at 165 ° C. with “Surlyn” (1705, manufactured by Du Pont-Mitsui Polychemicals Co., Ltd.) to a concentration of 35% by weight. Using the pellets cut to a length of 3 mm, hot press molding was performed at 185 ° C. using a 40 cm square mold.
Volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount,
The oxide film polishing rate was measured. As a result, a volume swelling ratio of 2.23% and 254 dust particles were observed. The Shore D hardness was 63 degrees. Oxide film polishing rate is 32nm
/ Min, the dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished could be reduced.

【0021】比較例1 40cm角の“アクスター”(東レ製、ポリエチレンテ
レフタレート繊維からなる不織布、目付280g/m2
に液状フェノール樹脂(住友デュレズ製、PR-531
23)を、乾燥重量比で50wt%になるよう含浸、乾
燥させ、170℃20分3.5MPa加圧下で1.2m
m厚に成形した。得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬
度、ダスト付着量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。こ
の結果、体積膨潤率1.23%、3234個ダストが認
められた。またショアD硬度は、90度であった。酸化
膜研磨速度は111nm/minであった。被研磨物表
面へのダスト付着性を少なくすることができなかった。
Comparative Example 1 "Axter" of 40 cm square (a non-woven fabric made of polyethylene terephthalate fiber, manufactured by Toray Co., Ltd., weight: 280 g / m 2 )
Liquid phenolic resin (Sumitomo Durez, PR-531)
23) was impregnated and dried at a dry weight ratio of 50 wt%, and dried at 170 ° C. for 20 minutes under a pressure of 3.5 MPa to form a 1.2 m
m thickness. The volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were measured on the obtained resin plate. As a result, a volume swelling ratio of 1.23% and 3,234 dust particles were observed. The Shore D hardness was 90 degrees. The oxide film polishing rate was 111 nm / min. Dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished could not be reduced.

【0022】実施例3 ワットマン社製17chr濾紙2枚を重ね、ポリビニル
ピロリドン(分子量10000)20部、MMA(メタ
クリル酸メチル)/AIBN(アゾイソブチロニトリ
ル)=999/1を80部混合した溶液を含浸させ、ガ
ラス板に挟み65℃温浴中で5時間板間重合した。この
後、100℃の乾燥機中で3時間放置し重合を完結させ
た。得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬度、ダスト付着
量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。この結果、体積膨
潤率3.23%、D硬度は、83度、151個ダストが
認められた。酸化膜研磨速度は132nm/minであ
った。被研磨物表面へのダスト付着性を少なくすること
ができた。
Example 3 Two 17 chr filter papers manufactured by Whatman Co. were stacked, and a solution prepared by mixing 20 parts of polyvinylpyrrolidone (molecular weight 10,000) and 80 parts of MMA (methyl methacrylate) / AIBN (azoisobutyronitrile) = 999/1 was used. , And sandwiched between glass plates, and polymerized between plates in a 65 ° C. warm bath for 5 hours. Thereafter, the mixture was allowed to stand in a dryer at 100 ° C. for 3 hours to complete the polymerization. The volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were measured on the obtained resin plate. As a result, the volume swelling ratio was 3.23%, the D hardness was 83 degrees, and 151 dust particles were recognized. The oxide film polishing rate was 132 nm / min. It was possible to reduce dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished.

【0023】実施例4 ナイロン6のペレットを200℃で射出成形し、1.2
mm厚の樹脂板を成形した。得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤
率、D硬度、ダスト付着量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行
った。この結果、体積膨潤率7.53%、D硬度は、7
3度、389個ダストが認められた。酸化膜研磨速度は
85nm/minであった。被研磨物表面へのダスト付
着性を少なくすることができた。
Example 4 Nylon 6 pellets were injection molded at 200 ° C.
A resin plate having a thickness of mm was formed. The volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were measured on the obtained resin plate. As a result, the volume swelling ratio was 7.53% and the D hardness was 7
Three times, 389 dusts were observed. The oxide film polishing rate was 85 nm / min. It was possible to reduce dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished.

【0024】比較例2 実施例2で、濾紙粉末を用いずに“サーリン”のペレッ
トを用い40cm角の金型を用いて185℃でホットプレ
ス成形を行った。得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬
度、ダスト付着量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。こ
の結果、体積膨潤率1.58%、3443個ダストが認
められた。またD硬度は、64度であった。酸化膜研磨
速度は35nm/minであった。被研磨物表面へのダ
スト付着性を少なくすることができなかった。
Comparative Example 2 In Example 2, hot press molding was carried out at 185 ° C. using a “40 cm square” mold using “Surlyn” pellets without using filter paper powder. The volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were measured on the obtained resin plate. As a result, a volume swelling ratio of 1.58% and 3,443 dust particles were observed. The D hardness was 64 degrees. The oxide film polishing rate was 35 nm / min. Dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished could not be reduced.

【0025】実施例4 ワットマン社製17chr濾紙2枚を重ね、液状フェノ
ール樹脂(住友デュレズ製、PR-53123)を、乾
燥重量比で50wt%になるよう含浸、乾燥させ、17
0℃20分3.5MPa加圧下で1.8mm厚に成形し
た。得られた樹脂板を1.2mm厚、X-Yグルーブ溝
加工して、得られた樹脂板で体積膨潤率、D硬度、ダス
ト付着量、酸化膜研磨速度の測定を行った。この結果、
体積膨潤率6.13%、287個ダスト付着が見られ、
D硬度は、88度であった。酸化膜研磨速度は62nm
/minであり、被研磨物表面へのダスト付着性を少な
くすることができた。
Example 4 Two 17 chr filter papers made by Whatman Co. were piled up, impregnated with a liquid phenol resin (PR-53123, manufactured by Sumitomo Durez) to a dry weight ratio of 50 wt%, and dried.
It was molded to a thickness of 1.8 mm under a pressure of 3.5 MPa at 0 ° C. for 20 minutes. The obtained resin plate was processed into an XY groove groove having a thickness of 1.2 mm, and the volume swelling ratio, D hardness, dust adhesion amount, and oxide film polishing rate were measured on the obtained resin plate. As a result,
Volumetric swelling rate 6.13%, 287 dust adhered,
The D hardness was 88 degrees. Oxide film polishing rate is 62nm
/ Min, the dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished could be reduced.

【0026】[0026]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、被研磨物表面へのダス
ト付着性を少なくすることができる。
According to the present invention, dust adhesion to the surface of the object to be polished can be reduced.

Claims (4)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】体積膨潤率が2.0%以上であることを特
徴とする研磨用パッド。
1. A polishing pad having a volume swelling ratio of 2.0% or more.
【請求項2】D硬度が60以上であることを特徴とする
請求項1記載の研磨用パッド。
2. The polishing pad according to claim 1, wherein the D hardness is 60 or more.
【請求項3】請求項1〜2のいずれかに記載の研磨用パ
ッドを用いることを特徴とする研磨装置。
3. A polishing apparatus using the polishing pad according to claim 1.
【請求項4】請求項1〜2のいずれかに記載の研磨用パ
ッドを用いることを特徴とする研磨方法。
4. A polishing method using the polishing pad according to claim 1.
JP36401999A 1999-12-22 1999-12-22 Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same Pending JP2001179608A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP36401999A JP2001179608A (en) 1999-12-22 1999-12-22 Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP36401999A JP2001179608A (en) 1999-12-22 1999-12-22 Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001179608A true JP2001179608A (en) 2001-07-03

Family

ID=18480782

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP36401999A Pending JP2001179608A (en) 1999-12-22 1999-12-22 Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2001179608A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003043071A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha Grinding pad and method of producing the same
WO2003092944A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2003-11-13 Sony Corporation Polishing method and polishing system, and method for fabricating semiconductor device
WO2003097298A1 (en) * 2002-05-20 2003-11-27 Nihon Micro Coating Co., Ltd. Non-foamed polishing pad and polishing method therewith
US7098255B2 (en) 2000-06-13 2006-08-29 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Process for producing polyurethane foam
US7455799B2 (en) 2001-02-01 2008-11-25 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Method of producing polishing pad-use polyurethane foam and polyurethane foam

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7098255B2 (en) 2000-06-13 2006-08-29 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Process for producing polyurethane foam
US7455799B2 (en) 2001-02-01 2008-11-25 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Method of producing polishing pad-use polyurethane foam and polyurethane foam
WO2003043071A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-05-22 Toyo Boseki Kabushiki Kaisha Grinding pad and method of producing the same
KR100845481B1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2008-07-10 도요 고무 고교 가부시키가이샤 Grinding pad and method of producing the same
US7488236B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2009-02-10 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Polishing pad and method of producing the same
US7651761B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2010-01-26 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Grinding pad and method of producing the same
US8318825B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2012-11-27 Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. Polishing pad and method of producing the same
WO2003092944A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2003-11-13 Sony Corporation Polishing method and polishing system, and method for fabricating semiconductor device
US7141501B2 (en) * 2002-04-30 2006-11-28 Sony Corporation Polishing method, polishing apparatus, and method of manufacturing semiconductor device
WO2003097298A1 (en) * 2002-05-20 2003-11-27 Nihon Micro Coating Co., Ltd. Non-foamed polishing pad and polishing method therewith

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6953388B2 (en) Polishing pad, and method and apparatus for polishing
TW425331B (en) Polishing pads for a semiconductor substrate
US20020016139A1 (en) Polishing tool and manufacturing method therefor
EP1189729A1 (en) Method of modifying a surface of a structured wafer
WO2012077592A1 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing pad and chemical mechanical polishing method using same
JP5708913B2 (en) Chemical mechanical polishing pad and chemical mechanical polishing method using the same
JPWO2018012468A1 (en) Polishing body and method of manufacturing the same
JPWO2004090963A1 (en) Polishing pad, manufacturing method thereof, and polishing method using the same
JP2002154050A (en) Polishing pad, and polishing device and method using the same
JP5711525B2 (en) Polishing pad and method of manufacturing polishing pad
JP2001179608A (en) Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same
JP2001358101A (en) Polishing pad
JP2002001648A (en) Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same
JPH11285961A (en) Polishing pad and polishing method
JP2002075934A (en) Pad for polishing, and apparatus and method for polishing
JP2002059358A (en) Polishing pad, polishing device using it and polishing method
JP2002066908A (en) Polishing pad, polishing device, and polishing method
JP2002036129A (en) Polishing pad and manufacturing method therefor
JP4438213B2 (en) Polishing pad composition and polishing pad using the same
JP2002158197A (en) Polishing pad as well as apparatus and method for polishing using the same
JP4356056B2 (en) Resin impregnated body, polishing pad, polishing apparatus and polishing method using the polishing pad
JP2001179607A (en) Polishing pad, and polishing device and polishing method using the same
CN113977453B (en) Chemical mechanical polishing pad for improving polishing flatness and application thereof
JP2002059357A (en) Polishing pad, polishing device and polishing method
JP2001239451A (en) Polishing pad, polishing machine using the same, and polishing method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20061218

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20080613

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081111

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20090317