EP2143527B1 - Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces - Google Patents
Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2143527B1 EP2143527B1 EP08382026A EP08382026A EP2143527B1 EP 2143527 B1 EP2143527 B1 EP 2143527B1 EP 08382026 A EP08382026 A EP 08382026A EP 08382026 A EP08382026 A EP 08382026A EP 2143527 B1 EP2143527 B1 EP 2143527B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- polishing
- tool
- resilient cushion
- compression
- optical surfaces
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
- B24B13/00—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
- B24B13/02—Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor by means of tools with abrading surfaces corresponding in shape with the lenses to be made
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D13/00—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor
- B24D13/14—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor acting by the front face
- B24D13/147—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor acting by the front face comprising assemblies of felted or spongy material; comprising pads surrounded by a flexible material
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a tool for polishing optical surfaces and to the use of such a tool when polishing optical surfaces. More specifically it relates to a tool for polishing optical surfaces comprising a rigid body carrying a resilient cushion which has a polishing face and to the use of such a tool for polishing optical surfaces.
- a conventional type of polishing tool comprises a support which to a certain extent has a similar surface as the lens to be polished and on which a polishing pad is mounted.
- the tool is brought into contact with the lens, and the lens surface is polished by the combined effect of a pressure between the tool and the lens and a relative angular velocity between them and with the aid of abrasive slurry.
- the goal of the polishing process is reduce the roughness of the lens to under 10 nanometres.
- Lenses of largely varying surfaces are known.
- the surface of a lens may be spherical, aspherical, toric or atoric. Additionally, lenses with more irregular surfaces have been developed, so called free-forms. Free-form lenses can have largely varying surfaces containing local curvatures from 13 dioptres to 0 dioptres (a locally flat surface). When polishing these free-form lenses, the goal is not to reduce the thickness of the lens by more than 20 micrometers and at the same time obtain a surface roughness under 10 nanometers.
- EP 1 655 102 describes using polishing tools with a rigid surface upon which an elastic body is mounted.
- the diameter of the elastic body is between 20 and 60 mm. It is described to prepare five to ten types of elastic bodies with a radius of curvature ranging between 5 and 50 mm and several elastic bodies with a radius of curvature between 100 and 200 mm to be able to polish lenses of most lens prescriptions.
- US 2008/0047301 describes using polishing tools which also comprise a rigid body carrying a resilient pad which has a polishing face. It also describes using 108 different devices to be able to polish a variety free-form lenses.
- polishing tools A variety of different polishing tools is needed to be able to polish the lenses of different prescriptions. So, to polish one lens after another, the polishing tool needs to be changed. This is cumbersome and slows down the polishing process. Additionally, it is expensive to have a high number of different tools.
- the present invention therefore aims at establishing a single polishing tool which can be used to polish a large variety of all lenses.
- the invention aims at providing a single polishing tool that can be used for polishing conventional and free-form surfaces, which are made from any of the organic materials normally used in ophthalmological lenses and with curvatures within the following curvature ranges: between 0 and -11 dioptres sphere, between 0 and -4 dioptres cylinder and additions up to 3.5 dioptres, with a maximum allowable (combined) local concave curvature along the surface of -11 dioptres.
- the lenses When they are being polished, the lenses have a round or elliptical shape.
- the diameter of the lenses is between 50 and 70 mm.
- the maximum difference between the diameters of the elliptical lenses is 15 mm.
- a polishing tool comprising a rigid base which has a spherical surface which carries a resilient cushion which has a polishing face, characterised in that the diameter of the rigid base is between 50 and 65 mm, the radius of curvature of the spherical surface is between 54 and 60 mm, the thickness of the resilient cushion is between 13 and 16 mm and the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion is between 0.08 and 0.15 bar at 10% compression and between 0.55 and 0.8 bar at 70% compression.
- the tool for polishing is mounted in a polishing machine and the lens is polished through a combined effect of a pressure between the tool and the lens and a relative angular velocity between them and with the aid of abrasive slurry.
- the polishing machine may be programmed differently, i.e. the force between lens and polisher, the speed of rotation, translation etc. may be varied. With the described tool, a large variety of lenses may be polished with the same tool.
- the polishing machine may be preprogrammed to automatically change the values of the polishing parameters (velocities, pressure etc.) depending on the curvature of the surface to be polished.
- the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion is substantially between 0.10 and 0.16 bar at 15% compression and between 0.20 and 0.30 bar at 50% compression.
- the resistance to compression is the parameter that describes how much the cushion deforms under pressure and thus to what extent the cushion can redistribute forces and pressures.
- the resistance to compression is particularly relevant in the range of 15 - 50% compression, since this is a compression that the resilient cushion experiences mostly during polishing. A small increase in the pressure should lead to a relatively large increase in deformation (or percentage of compression). This ensures a good redistribution of forces over the lens surface.
- the thickness of the resilient cushion is between 14 and 15 mm.
- the resilient cushion which deforms slightly during polishing redistributes the pressure and forces on the lens surface. For this, it needs to have a certain thickness. On the other hand, if the resilient cushion is too thick, it is more likely to bend and break during polishing. With a thickness between 14 and 15 mm, a good balance of redistribution of forces and probability of breaking is achieved.
- the radius of curvature of the spherical surface of the rigid base is between 54 and 56 mm.
- the resilient cushion deforms to redistribute pressure and forces on the lens surface. This way, the polishing is more equal over the entire lens surface and one can ensure that the required surface roughness has been achieved while at the same time the stock removal is uniformly distributed over the surface of the lens.
- the resilient cushion can partly redistribute forces and pressure, but this effect naturally is limited. If the curvature of the rigid base corresponds more closely to the curvature of the lens surface that is to be polished, the forces do not need to be redistributed as much.
- the diameter of the rigid base is between 55 and 65 mm.
- the larger the diameter of the tool the higher the velocity at its extremity in rotation and this leads to more material removed in the polishing process.
- the necessary linear movement of the tool in polishing is reduced, since with a small movement it already covers the entire surface of the lens. This reduces polishing time.
- a diameter between 50 and 65 mm satisfactory results are achieved, but improved results are achieved with diameters between 55 and 65 mm.
- the resilient cushion is a sponge, commercially available as Eurocell 130TM from Recticel.
- This sponge is made from polyether, has the required resistance to compression and a specific density between 110 kg/m 3 and 130 kg/m 3 .
- the polishing face of the resilient cushion is formed by a separate polishing pad which can be attached to the resilient cushion.
- the separate polishing pad may be attached to the resilient cushion using an adhesive.
- the polishing pads and resilient cushions can thus be manufactured separately which is easier.
- the polishing pad comprises a top layer and a bottom layer, the top layer being a nap layer adapted to carry an abrasive slurry.
- the bottom layer of the polishing pad is of a polyurethane impregnated non-woven fabric.
- the function of the polishing pad is to hold the abrasive slurry and bring it into contact with the lens.
- the pad with these characteristics has been shown to function properly and also to last long. With other polishing pads, the pad needs to be changed more frequently, which is costly and slows down the polishing process.
- polishing pads have the desired characteristics.
- suitable pads are: Bellatrix Polishing PAD K0034 TM commercially available from Filwel Co., Ltd. and PolitexTM Supreme finishing pad, commercially available from EMINESS technologies Inc.
- the abrasive slurry used may be an aluminium oxide water solution.
- FIG 1 it is shown how a polishing tool according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is built up from its separate components.
- a first component is the rigid body (11).
- Rigid body (11) comprises a surface (14), upon which resilient cushion (12) is to be mounted.
- the polishing face of the resilient cushion is formed by a polishing pad (13).
- Reference sign (15) is used to indicate the side of the rigid body (11) which is to be mounted in the polishing machine.
- the surface (14) is spherical and has a radius of curvature between 54 and 60 mm.
- the diameter of the tool is between 50 and 65 mm, and the thickness of resilient cushion (12) is between 13 and 16 mm.
- the resilient cushion has a resistance to compression between 0.14 and 0.4 bar when compressed between 15% and 60%.
- Figure 2 shows a schematic cross section of polishing tool (10) completely assembled with rigid body (11), resilient cushion (12) and polishing pad (13).
- the top surface (16) of the polishing pad is used to polish the surface (21) of a lens (20) and can be regarded as the polishing face of the tool.
- the lens surface that is to be polished (21) does not exactly correspond to the surface (16) of the polishing tool. In fact, it can be quite different, since a wide range of lenses (between 0 and -11 dioptres sphere, between 0 and -4 dioptres cylinder and additions up to 3.5 dioptres, but with a maximum allowable combined local concave curvature along the surface of -11 dioptres) is polished with the same tool.
- the resilient cushion (12) deforms when in contact with the lens. This ensures a redistribution of forces over the surface (16) of the lens. This ensures that the desired roughness and an even stock removal can be obtained over then entire surface.
- the tool is the same for the whole range of lenses, but the program that the polishing machine performs can vary.
- Some parameters of the polishing program may be e.g. rotational velocity ( ⁇ 1) of the tool, rotational velocity ( ⁇ 2) of the lens, lateral displacement and velocity (v) of the tool, inclination between the axis of the tool and the axis of the lens, force between lens and polisher and polishing time.
- Figure 3 shows a perspective view of a polishing pad (13) which might form the polishing surface (16) of a tool according to the invention.
- the bottom surface (19) may carry an adhesive to easily attach it to the resilient cushion.
- the polishing pad shown has two layers.
- a top layer (17) is designed to hold an abrasive slurry. For this purpose, it preferably has vertical pores.
- the abrasive slurry used may be an aluminium oxide water suspension.
- the bottom layer (18) is preferably of a non-woven fabric.
- Figure 4a shows a graph of the resistance to compression of a resilient cushion which may be used in the present invention.
- the graph shows the resistance to compression of the cushion Eurocell 130TM commercially available from Recticel.
- the resistance to compression is particularly relevant in the range of 15 - 50% compression, since this is a compression that the resilient cushion might ordinarily experience during polishing.
- a small increase in the pressure leads to a relatively large increase in deformation (or percentage of compression). This ensures a good redistribution of forces over the lens surface.
- Figure 4b shows a more detailed view of the lower range of compression.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Grinding And Polishing Of Tertiary Curved Surfaces And Surfaces With Complex Shapes (AREA)
- Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
- Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a tool for polishing optical surfaces and to the use of such a tool when polishing optical surfaces. More specifically it relates to a tool for polishing optical surfaces comprising a rigid body carrying a resilient cushion which has a polishing face and to the use of such a tool for polishing optical surfaces.
- In the manufacture of optical lenses, it is known to polish a previously machined lens surface by means of a polishing tool. A conventional type of polishing tool comprises a support which to a certain extent has a similar surface as the lens to be polished and on which a polishing pad is mounted. The tool is brought into contact with the lens, and the lens surface is polished by the combined effect of a pressure between the tool and the lens and a relative angular velocity between them and with the aid of abrasive slurry. The goal of the polishing process is reduce the roughness of the lens to under 10 nanometres.
- Lenses of largely varying surfaces are known. Firstly, the surface of a lens may be spherical, aspherical, toric or atoric. Additionally, lenses with more irregular surfaces have been developed, so called free-forms. Free-form lenses can have largely varying surfaces containing local curvatures from 13 dioptres to 0 dioptres (a locally flat surface). When polishing these free-form lenses, the goal is not to reduce the thickness of the lens by more than 20 micrometers and at the same time obtain a surface roughness under 10 nanometers.
- Traditionally, a manufacturer has a large number of different polishing tools at his disposal, which can all be mounted in the same polishing machine. Each of these tools is more or less adapted to the surface of the lens that is to be polished.
-
EP 1 655 102 -
US 2008/0047301 describes using polishing tools which also comprise a rigid body carrying a resilient pad which has a polishing face. It also describes using 108 different devices to be able to polish a variety free-form lenses. - A variety of different polishing tools is needed to be able to polish the lenses of different prescriptions. So, to polish one lens after another, the polishing tool needs to be changed. This is cumbersome and slows down the polishing process. Additionally, it is expensive to have a high number of different tools.
- The present invention therefore aims at establishing a single polishing tool which can be used to polish a large variety of all lenses. Specifically, the invention aims at providing a single polishing tool that can be used for polishing conventional and free-form surfaces, which are made from any of the organic materials normally used in ophthalmological lenses and with curvatures within the following curvature ranges: between 0 and -11 dioptres sphere, between 0 and -4 dioptres cylinder and additions up to 3.5 dioptres, with a maximum allowable (combined) local concave curvature along the surface of -11 dioptres. When they are being polished, the lenses have a round or elliptical shape. The diameter of the lenses is between 50 and 70 mm. The maximum difference between the diameters of the elliptical lenses is 15 mm.
- This goal is achieved with a polishing tool according to
claim 1. Namely, with a tool for polishing optical surfaces comprising a rigid base which has a spherical surface which carries a resilient cushion which has a polishing face, characterised in that the diameter of the rigid base is between 50 and 65 mm, the radius of curvature of the spherical surface is between 54 and 60 mm, the thickness of the resilient cushion is between 13 and 16 mm and the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion is between 0.08 and 0.15 bar at 10% compression and between 0.55 and 0.8 bar at 70% compression. - The tool for polishing is mounted in a polishing machine and the lens is polished through a combined effect of a pressure between the tool and the lens and a relative angular velocity between them and with the aid of abrasive slurry. For each lens, the polishing machine may be programmed differently, i.e. the force between lens and polisher, the speed of rotation, translation etc. may be varied. With the described tool, a large variety of lenses may be polished with the same tool. The polishing machine may be preprogrammed to automatically change the values of the polishing parameters (velocities, pressure etc.) depending on the curvature of the surface to be polished.
- Preferably, the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion is substantially between 0.10 and 0.16 bar at 15% compression and between 0.20 and 0.30 bar at 50% compression. During polishing, the resilient cushion deforms to redistribute the pressure and forces on the lens surface. The resistance to compression is the parameter that describes how much the cushion deforms under pressure and thus to what extent the cushion can redistribute forces and pressures. The resistance to compression is particularly relevant in the range of 15 - 50% compression, since this is a compression that the resilient cushion experiences mostly during polishing. A small increase in the pressure should lead to a relatively large increase in deformation (or percentage of compression). This ensures a good redistribution of forces over the lens surface.
- Preferably, the thickness of the resilient cushion is between 14 and 15 mm. The resilient cushion, which deforms slightly during polishing redistributes the pressure and forces on the lens surface. For this, it needs to have a certain thickness. On the other hand, if the resilient cushion is too thick, it is more likely to bend and break during polishing. With a thickness between 14 and 15 mm, a good balance of redistribution of forces and probability of breaking is achieved.
- Preferably, the radius of curvature of the spherical surface of the rigid base is between 54 and 56 mm. During polishing, the resilient cushion deforms to redistribute pressure and forces on the lens surface. This way, the polishing is more equal over the entire lens surface and one can ensure that the required surface roughness has been achieved while at the same time the stock removal is uniformly distributed over the surface of the lens. The resilient cushion can partly redistribute forces and pressure, but this effect naturally is limited. If the curvature of the rigid base corresponds more closely to the curvature of the lens surface that is to be polished, the forces do not need to be redistributed as much. But a large variety of lenses with varying radius of curvature needs to be polished with this single tool and it has been found, that the optimum form for the polishing tool is obtained with a radius of curvature of the spherical surface of the rigid body between 54 and 56 mm.
- Preferably, the diameter of the rigid base is between 55 and 65 mm. The larger the diameter of the tool, the higher the velocity at its extremity in rotation and this leads to more material removed in the polishing process. On the other hand, with a larger diameter, the necessary linear movement of the tool in polishing is reduced, since with a small movement it already covers the entire surface of the lens. This reduces polishing time. With a diameter between 50 and 65 mm, satisfactory results are achieved, but improved results are achieved with diameters between 55 and 65 mm.
- Preferably, the resilient cushion is a sponge, commercially available as Eurocell 130™ from Recticel. This sponge is made from polyether, has the required resistance to compression and a specific density between 110 kg/m3 and 130 kg/m3.
- Preferably, the polishing face of the resilient cushion is formed by a separate polishing pad which can be attached to the resilient cushion. The separate polishing pad may be attached to the resilient cushion using an adhesive. The polishing pads and resilient cushions can thus be manufactured separately which is easier.
- Preferably, the polishing pad comprises a top layer and a bottom layer, the top layer being a nap layer adapted to carry an abrasive slurry. More preferably, the bottom layer of the polishing pad is of a polyurethane impregnated non-woven fabric. The function of the polishing pad is to hold the abrasive slurry and bring it into contact with the lens. The pad with these characteristics has been shown to function properly and also to last long. With other polishing pads, the pad needs to be changed more frequently, which is costly and slows down the polishing process.
- A number of commercially available polishing pads have the desired characteristics. For example, suitable pads are: Bellatrix Polishing PAD K0034 ™ commercially available from Filwel Co., Ltd. and Politex™ Supreme finishing pad, commercially available from EMINESS technologies Inc. The abrasive slurry used may be an aluminium oxide water solution.
- Particular embodiments of the present invention will be described in the following, only by way of non-limiting example, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
-
figure 1 is a cross section showing a polishing tool according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, with its components shown separately; -
figure 2 is a cross section showing a polishing tool according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention in use; -
figure 3 is a perspective view of a polishing pad which might be used in the invention; -
figure 4a shows a graph of the resistance to compression of a resilient cushion which may be used in the present invention; -
figure 4b shows a detail of the graph shown infigure 4a . - In
figure 1 , it is shown how a polishing tool according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention is built up from its separate components. A first component is the rigid body (11). Rigid body (11) comprises a surface (14), upon which resilient cushion (12) is to be mounted. In this preferred embodiment, the polishing face of the resilient cushion is formed by a polishing pad (13). Reference sign (15) is used to indicate the side of the rigid body (11) which is to be mounted in the polishing machine. - According to the invention, the surface (14) is spherical and has a radius of curvature between 54 and 60 mm. The diameter of the tool is between 50 and 65 mm, and the thickness of resilient cushion (12) is between 13 and 16 mm. The resilient cushion has a resistance to compression between 0.14 and 0.4 bar when compressed between 15% and 60%.
-
Figure 2 shows a schematic cross section of polishing tool (10) completely assembled with rigid body (11), resilient cushion (12) and polishing pad (13). The top surface (16) of the polishing pad is used to polish the surface (21) of a lens (20) and can be regarded as the polishing face of the tool. - The lens surface that is to be polished (21) does not exactly correspond to the surface (16) of the polishing tool. In fact, it can be quite different, since a wide range of lenses (between 0 and -11 dioptres sphere, between 0 and -4 dioptres cylinder and additions up to 3.5 dioptres, but with a maximum allowable combined local concave curvature along the surface of -11 dioptres) is polished with the same tool. The resilient cushion (12) deforms when in contact with the lens. This ensures a redistribution of forces over the surface (16) of the lens. This ensures that the desired roughness and an even stock removal can be obtained over then entire surface.
- The tool is the same for the whole range of lenses, but the program that the polishing machine performs can vary. Some parameters of the polishing program may be e.g. rotational velocity (ω1) of the tool, rotational velocity (ω2) of the lens, lateral displacement and velocity (v) of the tool, inclination between the axis of the tool and the axis of the lens, force between lens and polisher and polishing time.
-
Figure 3 shows a perspective view of a polishing pad (13) which might form the polishing surface (16) of a tool according to the invention. The bottom surface (19) may carry an adhesive to easily attach it to the resilient cushion. The polishing pad shown has two layers. A top layer (17) is designed to hold an abrasive slurry. For this purpose, it preferably has vertical pores. The abrasive slurry used may be an aluminium oxide water suspension. The bottom layer (18) is preferably of a non-woven fabric. -
Figure 4a shows a graph of the resistance to compression of a resilient cushion which may be used in the present invention. The graph shows the resistance to compression of the cushion Eurocell 130™ commercially available from Recticel. The resistance to compression is particularly relevant in the range of 15 - 50% compression, since this is a compression that the resilient cushion might ordinarily experience during polishing. As can be seen in the graph, in this range, a small increase in the pressure leads to a relatively large increase in deformation (or percentage of compression). This ensures a good redistribution of forces over the lens surface.Figure 4b shows a more detailed view of the lower range of compression.
Claims (10)
- A tool (10) for polishing optical surfaces (21) comprising a rigid base (11) which has a spherical surface (14) which carries a resilient cushion (12) which has a polishing face (16), characterised in that
the diameter of the rigid base (11) is between 50 and 65 mm,
the radius of curvature of the spherical surface (14) is between 54 and 60 mm,
the thickness of the resilient cushion (12) is between 13 and 16 mm
and
the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion (12) is between 0.08 and 0.15 bar at 10% compression and between 0.55 and 0.8 bar at 70% compression. - A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to claim 1, characterised in that the resistance to compression of the resilient cushion (12) is substantially between 0.10 and 0.16 bar at 15% compression and between 0.20 and 0.30 bar at 50% compression.
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to any previous claim, characterised in that the thickness of the resilient cushion (12) is between 14 and 15 mm.
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to any previous claim, further characterised in that the radius of curvature of the spherical surface of the rigid base (11) is between 54 and 56 mm.
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to any previous claim, characterised in that the diameter of the rigid base (11) is between 55 and 65 mm.
- A tool for polishing optical surface according to any previous claim, characterised in that the resilient cushion is a sponge with a specific density between 110 and 130 kg/m3.
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to any previous claim, characterised in that the polishing face of the resilient cushion is formed by a separate polishing pad (13) which can be attached to said resilient cushion (12).
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according claim 7, characterised in that the polishing pad (13) comprises a top layer (17) and a bottom layer (18), the top layer being a nap layer adapted to carry an abrasive slurry.
- A tool for polishing optical surfaces according to claim 8, further characterised in that the bottom layer (18) of the polishing pad is of a polyurethane impregnated non-woven fabric.
- The use of a tool according to any previous claim for polishing an optical surface, particularly an ophthalmic lens, and more particularly a free-form lens.
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE602008004494T DE602008004494D1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | Tool for cleaning conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
ES08382026T ES2359283T3 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | TOOL FOR POLISHING OF CONVENTIONAL AND FREE FORMS OPTICAL SURFACES. |
AT08382026T ATE494985T1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | TOOL FOR CLEANING CONVENTIONAL AND FREE-FORMED OPTICAL SURFACES |
EP08382026A EP2143527B1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
JP2011517179A JP2011527242A (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2009-07-07 | Tools for polishing general and freeform optical surfaces |
PCT/ES2009/000355 WO2010004065A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2009-07-07 | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
US12/737,393 US20110104998A1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2009-07-07 | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08382026A EP2143527B1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2143527A1 EP2143527A1 (en) | 2010-01-13 |
EP2143527B1 true EP2143527B1 (en) | 2011-01-12 |
Family
ID=39876258
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08382026A Not-in-force EP2143527B1 (en) | 2008-07-08 | 2008-07-08 | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110104998A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2143527B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2011527242A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE494985T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602008004494D1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2359283T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010004065A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102013220973A1 (en) * | 2013-10-16 | 2015-04-16 | Carl Zeiss Vision International Gmbh | Tool for polishing of optical surfaces |
DE102014015052A1 (en) * | 2014-10-15 | 2016-04-21 | Satisloh Ag | Polishing disc for a tool for fine machining optically effective surfaces on spectacle lenses |
DE102019005084A1 (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2021-01-21 | Schneider Gmbh & Co. Kg | Polishing tool and device for polishing a workpiece |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL8502142A (en) * | 1985-07-26 | 1987-02-16 | Optimed Nv | METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN EYEWEAR GLASSES. |
US5140782A (en) * | 1990-10-29 | 1992-08-25 | Honore Mecteau | Tool and method for forming a lens |
JP3787457B2 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2006-06-21 | キヤノン株式会社 | Polishing tool |
FR2823143B1 (en) * | 2001-04-10 | 2003-07-04 | Essilor Int | TORIC TOOL FOR POLISHING AN OPTICAL SURFACE OF A LENS, AND METHOD FOR POLISHING AN ATORIC SURFACE USING SUCH A TOOL |
DE102004003131A1 (en) * | 2004-01-15 | 2005-08-11 | Carl Zeiss | Apparatus and method for polishing an optical surface, optical component, and method of manufacturing a polishing tool |
ES2249990B1 (en) * | 2004-08-03 | 2007-08-01 | Indo Internacional S.A. | TOOL AND PROCEDURE FOR POLISHING OPTICAL SURFACES. |
DE602005004229T2 (en) | 2004-11-09 | 2009-01-02 | Seiko Epson Corp. | An elastic polishing tool and method of polishing a lens with such a tool |
-
2008
- 2008-07-08 EP EP08382026A patent/EP2143527B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-07-08 ES ES08382026T patent/ES2359283T3/en active Active
- 2008-07-08 DE DE602008004494T patent/DE602008004494D1/en active Active
- 2008-07-08 AT AT08382026T patent/ATE494985T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2009
- 2009-07-07 JP JP2011517179A patent/JP2011527242A/en active Pending
- 2009-07-07 WO PCT/ES2009/000355 patent/WO2010004065A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-07-07 US US12/737,393 patent/US20110104998A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE494985T1 (en) | 2011-01-15 |
US20110104998A1 (en) | 2011-05-05 |
WO2010004065A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 |
JP2011527242A (en) | 2011-10-27 |
ES2359283T3 (en) | 2011-05-20 |
EP2143527A1 (en) | 2010-01-13 |
DE602008004494D1 (en) | 2011-02-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
ES2764652T3 (en) | Polishing disc for fine machining of optically active surfaces in eyeglass lenses | |
EP1655102B1 (en) | Elastic polishing tool and lens polishing method using this tool | |
JP5166037B2 (en) | Grinding wheel | |
KR102413618B1 (en) | Method for shaping and finishing a workpiece | |
JP4223404B2 (en) | Tools for surface treatment of optical surfaces | |
EP1366858B1 (en) | Polisher and polishing method | |
EP2143527B1 (en) | Tool for polishing conventional and free-form optical surfaces | |
PT2384854E (en) | Polishing tool for machining optical surfaces, in particular free form surfaces | |
JP2009125877A (en) | Lens holder and curved-surface polishing method for lens | |
US9409274B2 (en) | Tool for the polishing of optical surfaces | |
JP2001088039A (en) | Polishing tool | |
JP4387708B2 (en) | Polishing method and manufacturing method for plastic spectacle lens | |
KR102713740B1 (en) | Matchable abrasives | |
EP1787752A1 (en) | Tool and method for polishing optical surfaces | |
WO2010110271A1 (en) | Manufacturing method for lens and lens holder | |
JP2012213821A (en) | Method for manufacturing spectacle lens | |
EP3766635B1 (en) | Polishing tool and device for polishing a workpiece | |
EP2822731B1 (en) | Method for polishing an optical surface by means of a polishing tool | |
JP5466968B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of optical lens | |
JP2012213822A (en) | Spectacle lens manufacturing method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100219 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602008004494 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20110224 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008004494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110224 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2359283 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20110520 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110112 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20110112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110412 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110512 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110512 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110413 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110412 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20110728 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20110729 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110726 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20111013 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008004494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20111013 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110708 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20120708 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130329 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130201 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120708 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602008004494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110708 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20131018 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110112 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120709 |