[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1062638B1 - System and method for management of correspondence - Google Patents

System and method for management of correspondence Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1062638B1
EP1062638B1 EP99913943A EP99913943A EP1062638B1 EP 1062638 B1 EP1062638 B1 EP 1062638B1 EP 99913943 A EP99913943 A EP 99913943A EP 99913943 A EP99913943 A EP 99913943A EP 1062638 B1 EP1062638 B1 EP 1062638B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
delivery
correspondence
information indicative
fax
item
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99913943A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1062638A1 (en
EP1062638A4 (en
Inventor
George Brookner
Robert G. Schwartz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hasler Inc
Original Assignee
Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems Inc filed Critical Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems Inc
Publication of EP1062638A1 publication Critical patent/EP1062638A1/en
Publication of EP1062638A4 publication Critical patent/EP1062638A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1062638B1 publication Critical patent/EP1062638B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00733Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00459Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
    • G07B17/00467Transporting mailpieces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00459Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
    • G07B17/00508Printing or attaching on mailpieces
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/00024Physical or organizational aspects of franking systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/00024Physical or organizational aspects of franking systems
    • G07B2017/00072Hybrid mail, i.e. mail delivered using different physical means along the mail delivery path, e.g. email and envelope
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00016Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
    • G07B17/0008Communication details outside or between apparatus
    • G07B2017/00088Communication details outside or between apparatus via landlines
    • G07B2017/00096Communication details outside or between apparatus via landlines via phone lines
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00193Constructional details of apparatus in a franking system
    • G07B2017/00201Open franking system, i.e. the printer is not dedicated to franking only, e.g. PC (Personal Computer)
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00314Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
    • G07B2017/00338Error detection or handling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00185Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
    • G07B17/00362Calculation or computing within apparatus, e.g. calculation of postage value
    • G07B2017/00379Calculation of different sending options for a mail piece
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00459Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
    • G07B17/00467Transporting mailpieces
    • G07B2017/00491Mail/envelope/insert handling system
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00459Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
    • G07B17/00508Printing or attaching on mailpieces
    • G07B2017/00572Details of printed item
    • G07B2017/00596Printing of address
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00459Details relating to mailpieces in a franking system
    • G07B17/00508Printing or attaching on mailpieces
    • G07B2017/00612Attaching item on mailpiece
    • G07B2017/0062Label
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07BTICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
    • G07B17/00Franking apparatus
    • G07B17/00733Cryptography or similar special procedures in a franking system
    • G07B2017/00959Cryptographic modules, e.g. a PC encryption board
    • G07B2017/00967PSD [Postal Security Device] as defined by the USPS [US Postal Service]

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to postage meters (franking machines), and relates particularly to systems in which items of correspondence are to be dispatched by any of several different means.
  • the application claims priority from US application no. 60/078,487, filed March 18, 1998, which application is incorporated herein by reference to the extent permitted by the designated and elected States hereto.
  • the accounting means includes an ascending register indicative of postage that has been printed, and typically a piece counter indicative of the number of mail pieces that have been printed. In many countries including the United States, the accounting means also includes a descending register indicative of the amount of postage value available to be printed.
  • the printing means is used to print postage indicia on mail pieces, typically by a relief printing die with characteristic fluorescent ink.
  • Such postage meters have worked exceeding well for decades and have proven to be reliable. While it is technically possible to print postal indicia for which no money has been paid to the post office, such fraud is relatively infrequent because it would be readily detectable through physical inspection of the meter for tampering.
  • the postage meter saves the postal authority from much of the work of printing, stocking and selling postage stamps.
  • the postage meter user can simply print the new postal amount, while the stamp user must queue up at the post office to purchase stamps in the new denomination.
  • nonsecure printers such as laser printers, ink-jet printers, and thermal transfer printers.
  • nonsecure printers because the printer itself is not in a secure housing and because the communications channel linking the printer to other apparatus is nonsecure.
  • the proposed anti-fraud measure is to store information within the indicia which would permit detecting fraud.
  • the indicium would include not only human-readable text such as a date and a postage amount, but would also include machine-readable information, for example by means of a two-dimensional bar code.
  • the machine-readable information would be cryptographically signed, and would include within it some information intended to make fraud more difficult.
  • the information would typically include an identification of the postage meter license (granted by the meter manufacturer or by the postal authorities, depending on the country), an indication of the number of mail pieces franked, the postage amount, a postal security device identifier about which more will be said later, the date and time, and a zip code or post code of the mail piece addressee.
  • Yet another drawback is that it is commonplace for a mail piece to get smudged on the way to the post office or within the post office, prior to the authentication scanning by the post office. If the post office is unable to read the bar code, the post office has to decide whether to return the mail piece to the sender, or risk delivering a mail piece bearing a counterfeit indicium.
  • the typical apparatus for printing such "encrypted indicia" postage includes what is called a postal security device or PSD.
  • PSD has a secure housing, and within the secure housing are the accounting registers as well as a cryptographic engine.
  • the engine permits cryptographic authentication and signing for communication with an external device such as the computer of the meter manufacturer or of the post office.
  • the engine also permits creation of postal indicia which contain specified information and which are cryptographically signed.
  • the PSD may well be physically small as compared to traditional postage meters.
  • the PSD may be the size of a PCMCIA card or the size of a smart card.
  • the memory must be protected against inadvertent damage due to malfunction of the processor of the PSD, for example as set forth in US Pat. No. 5668973, Protection system for critical memory information owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application.
  • the PSD must handle power failure in a graceful fashion, for example as set forth in US Pat. No. 5712542, Postage meter with improved handling of power failure , also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application.
  • the printer may preferably be that described in PCT publication no. 97-46389, Printing apparatus, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application. While it has been proposed that the PSD contain a real-time clock which is keeping time continuously, desirably this requirement may be avoided as described in PCT publication no. 98-08325, Printing postage with cryptographic clocking security, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application. PSDs can form part of a network with multiple printers as described in PCT publication no. 98-13790, Proof of postage digital franking, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application.
  • US 5 586 037 discloses an automated self-service mail processing system with integrated weighing system.
  • the system also has email and fax capabilities.
  • a system for management of correspondence comprising a processor having a user interface, a printer, a fax modem, a simple mail transport protocol server and a postal security device, wherein said processor is communicatively coupled with the printer, said printer disposed to print adhesive labels, letters and envelopes, said processor also communicatively coupled with the fax modem, said processor also communicatively coupled with the simple mail transport protocol server; said system further comprising means receiving information indicative of items of correspondence to be delivered, the information regarding each item further indicative of at least one means of delivery for said item; said system further comprising means responsive to the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery for causing transmission by fax via the fax modem in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates fax, for causing transmission by email via the simple mail transport protocol server in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates email, and in the event that the information .indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail, causing the postal
  • the system according to the invention is typified by a personal computer 50, shown in Fig. 2.
  • the personal computer 50 receives, or has stored within it, information about a number of items of correspondence to be sent, all omitted for clarity in Fig. 2.
  • the computer 50 has at least one printer 53, and preferably has more than one printer, one optimized for printing on paper sheets, and another optimized for printing on label stock and envelopes.
  • the computer 50 has a postal security device 52, as discussed above.
  • the postal security device 52 has nonvolatile memory and a cryptographic engine, and under stored program control it is able to generate digitally printed postal indicia which will be accepted by the postal authorities for payment of postage.
  • the indicia are printed on the printer 53.
  • the computer 50 has connected with it, or includes, a Simple Mail Transport Protocol(SMTP) server 54, and a fax server or fax modem 55.
  • the user controls the computer 50 through a user interface 51.
  • SMTP Simple Mail Transport Protocol
  • a user interface This may be a keyboard, a touch screen, or other user input device.
  • the computer 50 handles input requests, formulates desired outputs, and manages the system with respect to configuration parameters such as departmental charge-backs.
  • the data routing can take a document-printing path 2, a high-volume production printing path 3, a label printing path 4, a fax path 5, and an email path 6.
  • chargeback is done for example in box 9.
  • the correspondence and envelope may be typed in box 10.
  • a number of moderate-capacity printers are employed so that if one breaks, the load may be distributed among other printers.
  • the computer 50 passes the correspondence to a fax modem, or to a fax server 55, which may be integral with the computer 50 or may be separate from it.
  • the correspondence is sent by fax.
  • the computer 50 passes the correspondence to a simple mail-transport protocol server 54, which may be integral with the computer 50 or may be separate from it.
  • the correspondence is sent by email over a TCP/IP link, omitted for clarity in Fig. 2.
  • One of the chief drawbacks of the cryptographically signed postal indicium is that the postal service may require that the indicium be based in part on a Zip code or post code of the associated mail piece. This leads to great difficulty in the event that an indicium and its associated addressed envelope or package become mismatched.
  • the postal authorities will assume that the sender is engaged in mail fraud, for example trying to use a single indicium more than once on more than one mail piece.
  • the address and postage labels are desirably printed "two-up", side by side or adjacent in the label printer. This permits automated equipment, or a human user, to place the two labels on a mail piece (e.g. an envelope or package) at about the same time, thus reducing the likelihood of a mismatch.
  • the invention comprises a system for management of correspondence, comprising a processor 50 having a user interface 51, said processor 50 communicatively coupled with a printer 53, said printer disposed to print adhesive labels, said processor 50 also communicatively coupled with a fax modem 55, said processor also communicatively coupled with a simple mail transport protocol server 54; said system further comprising means receiving information indicative of items of correspondence to be delivered, the information regarding each item further indicative of at least one means of delivery for said item; said system further comprising means responsive to the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery for causing transmission by fax via the fax modem 55 in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates fax, for causing transmission by email via the simple mail transport protocol server 54 in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates email, and in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail requiring labels, causing the postal security device 52 to generate a postage indicium, and causing the printer 53 to print the post

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Hardware Redundancy (AREA)

Abstract

In the system of the invention, a user provides inputs at a user interface (51). The user's inputs relate to the expected type of delivery (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Alternatively, the system may already have information stored as to the type of delivery (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) to be used with particular correspondents. Based on the type of delivery (2, 3, 4, 5, 6), the system (50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) determines for each item of correspondence, whether the delivery will be by physical delivery of a printed document (2, 3, 4), by fax (5) or by e-mail (6). The system (50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) further determines for each item of correspondence, which is to be delivered by physical delivery a printed document (2, 3, 4), whether an envelope (10, 11) is required and if the address information is to be printed on the envelope or on a label (12) that is to be applied to the envelope. Further in the case of an item of correspondence, which is to be delivered by physical delivery a postage indicia is printed on the envelope or on a label (12) that is to be applied to the envelope. If the system (50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) determines for an item of correspondence that the delivery will be by fax (5), then the correspondence is sent using fax (55). If the system (50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) determines for an item of correspondence that the delivery will be by e-mail (6), then the correspondence is sent using SMTP server (54).

Description

The invention relates generally to postage meters (franking machines), and relates particularly to systems in which items of correspondence are to be dispatched by any of several different means. The application claims priority from US application no. 60/078,487, filed March 18, 1998, which application is incorporated herein by reference to the extent permitted by the designated and elected States hereto.
Background
It has been well known for many decades to use a postage meter which has within a secure housing an accounting means and a printing means. The accounting means includes an ascending register indicative of postage that has been printed, and typically a piece counter indicative of the number of mail pieces that have been printed. In many countries including the United States, the accounting means also includes a descending register indicative of the amount of postage value available to be printed. The printing means is used to print postage indicia on mail pieces, typically by a relief printing die with characteristic fluorescent ink. Such postage meters have worked exceeding well for decades and have proven to be reliable. While it is technically possible to print postal indicia for which no money has been paid to the post office, such fraud is relatively infrequent because it would be readily detectable through physical inspection of the meter for tampering.
The postage meter saves the postal authority from much of the work of printing, stocking and selling postage stamps. When postal rates change, the postage meter user can simply print the new postal amount, while the stamp user must queue up at the post office to purchase stamps in the new denomination.
In recent years it has been proposed to print postal indicia by means of conventional nonsecure printers such as laser printers, ink-jet printers, and thermal transfer printers. Such printers are termed "nonsecure" because the printer itself is not in a secure housing and because the communications channel linking the printer to other apparatus is nonsecure.
Under such a proposal, the question naturally arises what would prevent a user from printing the same postal indicium repeatedly, thereby printing postal indicia for which no money has been paid to the post office. The proposed anti-fraud measure is to store information within the indicia which would permit detecting fraud. The indicium would include not only human-readable text such as a date and a postage amount, but would also include machine-readable information, for example by means of a two-dimensional bar code. The machine-readable information would be cryptographically signed, and would include within it some information intended to make fraud more difficult. The information would typically include an identification of the postage meter license (granted by the meter manufacturer or by the postal authorities, depending on the country), an indication of the number of mail pieces franked, the postage amount, a postal security device identifier about which more will be said later, the date and time, and a zip code or post code of the mail piece addressee.
There are, of course, many potential drawbacks to such an approach for printing of postal indicia. A user who intends to defraud the postal service might use a bar-code reader to read the contents of the indicium. (This capability illustrates the pointlessness of trying to give physical security to the printing means or of the communications channel by which the printing means is controlled.) The contents of the bar code could be used to print identical or nearly identical indicia, perhaps at a geographic distance. It would then fall to the postal service to perform an analysis on all or nearly all of the indicia scanned on a particular day, to try to identify duplicates.
Yet another drawback is that it is commonplace for a mail piece to get smudged on the way to the post office or within the post office, prior to the authentication scanning by the post office. If the post office is unable to read the bar code, the post office has to decide whether to return the mail piece to the sender, or risk delivering a mail piece bearing a counterfeit indicium.
The typical apparatus for printing such "encrypted indicia" postage includes what is called a postal security device or PSD. The PSD has a secure housing, and within the secure housing are the accounting registers as well as a cryptographic engine. The engine permits cryptographic authentication and signing for communication with an external device such as the computer of the meter manufacturer or of the post office. The engine also permits creation of postal indicia which contain specified information and which are cryptographically signed. The PSD may well be physically small as compared to traditional postage meters. The PSD may be the size of a PCMCIA card or the size of a smart card.
Within the PSD the memory must be protected against inadvertent damage due to malfunction of the processor of the PSD, for example as set forth in US Pat. No. 5668973, Protection system for critical memory information owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application. The PSD must handle power failure in a graceful fashion, for example as set forth in US Pat. No. 5712542, Postage meter with improved handling of power failure, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application.
To reduce smudging, the printer may preferably be that described in PCT publication no. 97-46389, Printing apparatus, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application. While it has been proposed that the PSD contain a real-time clock which is keeping time continuously, desirably this requirement may be avoided as described in PCT publication no. 98-08325, Printing postage with cryptographic clocking security, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application. PSDs can form part of a network with multiple printers as described in PCT publication no. 98-13790, Proof of postage digital franking, also owned by the same assignee as the assignee of the present application.
It has become commonplace in recent years to correspond by a variety of different means, for example by means of printed documents that are physically delivered, by means of fax, and by means of email. Among physically delivered documents there are documents sent in envelopes bearing addresses printed thereon, and documents sent in envelopes or packages that are addressed by means of adhesive labels.
It would be advantageous to have a system with great flexibility to accommodate a number deliver methods.
US 5 586 037 discloses an automated self-service mail processing system with integrated weighing system. The system also has email and fax capabilities.
Summary of the invention
According to the invention, there is provided a system for management of correspondence, comprising a processor having a user interface, a printer, a fax modem, a simple mail transport protocol server and a postal security device, wherein said processor is communicatively coupled with the printer, said printer disposed to print adhesive labels, letters and envelopes, said processor also communicatively coupled with the fax modem, said processor also communicatively coupled with the simple mail transport protocol server; said system further comprising means receiving information indicative of items of correspondence to be delivered, the information regarding each item further indicative of at least one means of delivery for said item; said system further comprising means responsive to the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery for causing transmission by fax via the fax modem in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates fax, for causing transmission by email via the simple mail transport protocol server in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates email, and in the event that the information .indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail, causing the postal security device to generate a postage indicium, and causing the printer to print the postage indicium, and wherein the system further comprises means for inserting printed letters into respective envelopes and sealing said envelopes..
Description of the drawing
The invention will be described with respect to a drawing, of which:
  • Fig. 1 shows a flow chart depicting handling of correspondence in keeping with the invention; and
  • Fig. 2 is a functional block diagram of the system.
  • Detailed description
    The system according to the invention is typified by a personal computer 50, shown in Fig. 2. The personal computer 50 receives, or has stored within it, information about a number of items of correspondence to be sent, all omitted for clarity in Fig. 2. The computer 50 has at least one printer 53, and preferably has more than one printer, one optimized for printing on paper sheets, and another optimized for printing on label stock and envelopes. The computer 50 has a postal security device 52, as discussed above. The postal security device 52 has nonvolatile memory and a cryptographic engine, and under stored program control it is able to generate digitally printed postal indicia which will be accepted by the postal authorities for payment of postage. The indicia are printed on the printer 53. In addition, the computer 50 has connected with it, or includes, a Simple Mail Transport Protocol(SMTP) server 54, and a fax server or fax modem 55. The user controls the computer 50 through a user interface 51.
    As described in Fig. 1, there is a user interface. This may be a keyboard, a touch screen, or other user input device. The computer 50 handles input requests, formulates desired outputs, and manages the system with respect to configuration parameters such as departmental charge-backs. The data routing can take a document-printing path 2, a high-volume production printing path 3, a label printing path 4, a fax path 5, and an email path 6. In the case of an item of correspondence needing a postal delivery address, it is desired to check the address hygiene as at box 7 and to correct the address accordingly. In the case of an organization that charges back postage charges by departmental or other accounts, then chargeback is done for example in box 9. Many mail types, including business and personal envelopes, are eligible for discounts if the correspondence is presorted, so presort and bundling information is generated in boxes 8. In the case of an item of correspondence that is intended for an envelope with a printed address, the correspondence and envelope may be typed in box 10. Preferably a number of moderate-capacity printers are employed so that if one breaks, the load may be distributed among other printers.
    In the case of high-volume production printing, the path of block 3 is followed. If necessary, the mail piece is inserted into an envelope and sealed in block 11.
    In the case of a fax message, the path of block 5 is followed. The computer 50 passes the correspondence to a fax modem, or to a fax server 55, which may be integral with the computer 50 or may be separate from it. The correspondence is sent by fax.
    In the case of an email message, the path of block 6 is followed. The computer 50 passes the correspondence to a simple mail-transport protocol server 54, which may be integral with the computer 50 or may be separate from it. The correspondence is sent by email over a TCP/IP link, omitted for clarity in Fig. 2.
    One of the chief drawbacks of the cryptographically signed postal indicium is that the postal service may require that the indicium be based in part on a Zip code or post code of the associated mail piece. This leads to great difficulty in the event that an indicium and its associated addressed envelope or package become mismatched. The postal authorities will assume that the sender is engaged in mail fraud, for example trying to use a single indicium more than once on more than one mail piece. Thus it is highly desirable to set up the system so that if it is printing labels, it will not merely print postal indicia labels, but will also print the delivery address on a label. The address and postage labels are desirably printed "two-up", side by side or adjacent in the label printer. This permits automated equipment, or a human user, to place the two labels on a mail piece (e.g. an envelope or package) at about the same time, thus reducing the likelihood of a mismatch.
    Stated differently, the invention comprises a system for management of correspondence, comprising a processor 50 having a user interface 51, said processor 50 communicatively coupled with a printer 53, said printer disposed to print adhesive labels, said processor 50 also communicatively coupled with a fax modem 55, said processor also communicatively coupled with a simple mail transport protocol server 54; said system further comprising means receiving information indicative of items of correspondence to be delivered, the information regarding each item further indicative of at least one means of delivery for said item; said system further comprising means responsive to the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery for causing transmission by fax via the fax modem 55 in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates fax, for causing transmission by email via the simple mail transport protocol server 54 in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates email, and in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail requiring labels, causing the postal security device 52 to generate a postage indicium, and causing the printer 53 to print the postage indicium on a label. Optionally, in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail requiring labels, the system prints an address label responsive to the information indicative of the item to be delivered, along with the label bearing the postage indicium.
    Those skilled in the art will have no difficulty devising obvious enhancements and improvements to the invention, all of which are meant to be encompassed within the invention, as defined by the claims that follow.

    Claims (3)

    1. A system for management of correspondence, comprising a processor having a user interface, a printer, a fax modem, a simple mail transport protocol server and a postal security device, wherein said processor is communicatively coupled with the printer, said printer disposed to print adhesive labels, letters and envelopes, said processor also communicatively coupled with the fax modem, said processor also communicatively coupled with the simple mail transport protocol server; said system further comprising means receiving information indicative of items of correspondence to be delivered, the information regarding each item further indicative of at least one means of delivery for said item; said system further comprising means responsive to the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery for causing transmission by fax via the fax modem in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates fax, for causing transmission by email via the simple mail transport protocol server in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates email, and in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail, causing the postal security device to generate a postage indicium, and causing the printer to print the postage indicium, and wherein the system further comprises means for inserting printed letters into respective envelopes and sealing said envelopes.
    2. The system of claim 1 wherein in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail requiring labels, the system prints an address label responsive to the information indicative of the item to be delivered, along with the label bearing the postage indicium.
    3. The system of claim 1 wherein in the event that the information indicative of the at least one means of delivery indicates mail requiring labels, the system prints the postage indicium on a label.
    EP99913943A 1998-03-18 1999-03-18 System and method for management of correspondence Expired - Lifetime EP1062638B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    US7848798P 1998-03-18 1998-03-18
    US78487P 1998-03-18
    PCT/US1999/005893 WO1999048054A1 (en) 1998-03-18 1999-03-18 System and method for management of correspondence

    Publications (3)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1062638A1 EP1062638A1 (en) 2000-12-27
    EP1062638A4 EP1062638A4 (en) 2001-07-18
    EP1062638B1 true EP1062638B1 (en) 2005-10-26

    Family

    ID=22144335

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP99913943A Expired - Lifetime EP1062638B1 (en) 1998-03-18 1999-03-18 System and method for management of correspondence

    Country Status (6)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1062638B1 (en)
    JP (1) JP2002507801A (en)
    AT (1) ATE308087T1 (en)
    CA (1) CA2324098C (en)
    DE (1) DE69927959T2 (en)
    WO (1) WO1999048054A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (18)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US7035832B1 (en) 1994-01-03 2006-04-25 Stamps.Com Inc. System and method for automatically providing shipping/transportation fees
    US6671813B2 (en) 1995-06-07 2003-12-30 Stamps.Com, Inc. Secure on-line PC postage metering system
    US7265853B1 (en) 1997-10-17 2007-09-04 Stamps.Com, Inc. Postage server system and method
    WO2001029780A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2001-04-26 Stamps.Com Address matching system and method
    US7236970B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2007-06-26 Stamps.Com Address matching system and method
    US7805384B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2010-09-28 Stamps.Com, Inc. Postal printer driver system and method
    US7093025B1 (en) 2000-10-04 2006-08-15 International Business Machines Corporation SMTP extension for email delivery failure
    DE10345056A1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2005-04-28 Deutsche Post Ag Method and device for creating a mailpiece
    US7742581B2 (en) 2004-11-24 2010-06-22 Value-Added Communications, Inc. Electronic messaging exchange
    US9876915B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2018-01-23 Value-Added Communications, Inc. Message exchange
    US9282188B2 (en) 2005-01-28 2016-03-08 Value-Added Communications, Inc. Voice message exchange
    US8060555B2 (en) 2005-08-17 2011-11-15 Canada Post Corporation Electronic content management systems and methods
    US7804941B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2010-09-28 Securus Technologies, Inc. Systems and methods for message delivery in a controlled environment facility
    US8612361B1 (en) 2006-12-27 2013-12-17 Stamps.Com Inc. System and method for handling payment errors with respect to delivery services
    US8775331B1 (en) 2006-12-27 2014-07-08 Stamps.Com Inc Postage metering with accumulated postage
    US9621714B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2017-04-11 Value-Added Communications, Inc. System and method for electronic notification in institutional communication
    US10713634B1 (en) 2011-05-18 2020-07-14 Stamps.Com Inc. Systems and methods using mobile communication handsets for providing postage
    US10749827B2 (en) 2017-05-11 2020-08-18 Global Tel*Link Corporation System and method for inmate notification and training in a controlled environment facility

    Family Cites Families (14)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US5272640A (en) * 1986-10-17 1993-12-21 Wu Sheng J Automatic mail-processing device with full functions
    US5586037A (en) * 1991-04-01 1996-12-17 Pi Electronics, Inc. Automated self-service mail processing and storing systems
    US5737395A (en) * 1991-10-28 1998-04-07 Centigram Communications Corporation System and method for integrating voice, facsimile and electronic mail data through a personal computer
    US5530740A (en) * 1991-10-28 1996-06-25 Contigram Communications Corporation System and method for integrating voice, facsimile and electronic mail data through a personal computer
    US5513117A (en) * 1993-04-30 1996-04-30 Small; Maynard E. Apparatus and method for electronically dispensing personalized greeting cards and gifts
    US5568536A (en) * 1994-07-25 1996-10-22 International Business Machines Corporation Selective reconfiguration method and apparatus in a multiple application personal communications device
    JP3160177B2 (en) * 1995-03-06 2001-04-23 松下電器産業株式会社 Facsimile electronic mail device
    US5668973A (en) 1995-04-14 1997-09-16 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems Ag Protection system for critical memory information
    US5712542A (en) 1995-05-25 1998-01-27 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems Ag Postage meter with improved handling of power failure
    US5648916A (en) * 1995-08-10 1997-07-15 Pitney Bowes Inc. Internal mail distribution system
    US6287031B1 (en) * 1996-06-03 2001-09-11 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. Printing apparatus
    DE69734436T2 (en) * 1996-08-20 2006-07-13 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc., Shelton PRINTING PORTO WITH CRYPTOGRAPHIC TAKKTICHERHEIT
    US5838768A (en) * 1996-10-03 1998-11-17 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson System and method for controlled media conversion in an intelligent network
    US6009417A (en) * 1996-09-24 1999-12-28 Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. Proof of postage digital franking

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    DE69927959D1 (en) 2005-12-01
    CA2324098A1 (en) 1999-09-23
    ATE308087T1 (en) 2005-11-15
    DE69927959T2 (en) 2006-04-20
    JP2002507801A (en) 2002-03-12
    CA2324098C (en) 2010-01-19
    WO1999048054A1 (en) 1999-09-23
    EP1062638A1 (en) 2000-12-27
    EP1062638A4 (en) 2001-07-18

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP1062638B1 (en) System and method for management of correspondence
    US5925864A (en) Metering incoming deliverable mail to automatically enable address correction
    US8463716B2 (en) Auditable and secure systems and methods for issuing refunds for misprints of mail pieces
    US7831518B2 (en) Systems and methods for detecting postage fraud using an indexed lookup procedure
    US6112193A (en) Reading encrypted data on a mail piece to cancel the mail piece
    US6064995A (en) Metering incoming mail to detect fraudulent indicia
    CA2246592C (en) Metering incoming deliverable mail
    US5675650A (en) Controlled acceptance mail payment and evidencing system
    US20030101143A1 (en) Systems and methods for detecting postage fraud using a unique mail piece indicium
    US6592027B2 (en) Method for the recovery of unusable printed postage
    CA1263676A1 (en) Postage and mailing information applying system
    US10431013B2 (en) High speed printing
    US6006211A (en) Metering incoming deliverable mail to identify delivery delays
    JPS62219096A (en) Mail processing method and apparatus
    JPS62247489A (en) Postage generator and calculation of postage
    US6820065B1 (en) System and method for management of postage meter licenses
    JPS62196788A (en) Postage calculator and sending of postage value
    EP1064621B1 (en) System and method for management of postage meter licenses
    GB2188868A (en) Verification of postage in batch mailing
    US20030084007A1 (en) Postage stamps authenticating the sender of a mail piece, and methods for use therewith
    US20050209976A1 (en) Mail receipt terminal having deposit tracking capability
    US6897973B1 (en) System and method for management of correspondence
    AU2002220513B2 (en) Method for providing postal deliveries with franking stamps
    US7251608B2 (en) Fund transfers using postage indicia
    CA1264341A (en) Postage and mailing information applying system

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20001013

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI

    A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

    Effective date: 20010607

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A4

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20041029

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051026

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051026

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051026

    Ref country code: AT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051026

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69927959

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20051201

    Kind code of ref document: P

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060126

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060206

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: PL

    ET Fr: translation filed
    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20060727

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Payment date: 20080327

    Year of fee payment: 10

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20100419

    Year of fee payment: 12

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20090318

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20110404

    Year of fee payment: 13

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20110321

    Year of fee payment: 13

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20111001

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 69927959

    Country of ref document: DE

    Effective date: 20111001

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20120318

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20121130

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20120318

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20120402