Sarwar et al., 2024 - Google Patents
Enhancing pipeline integrity: a comprehensive review of deep learning-enabled finite element analysis for stress corrosion cracking predictionSarwar et al., 2024
View PDF- Document ID
- 3929645941230154063
- Author
- Sarwar U
- Mokhtar A
- Muhammad M
- Wassan R
- Soomro A
- Wassan M
- Kaka S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
External Links
Snippet
Pipelines are crucial for transporting energy sources, yet corrosion especially stress corrosion cracking (SCC) poses a complex and potentially catastrophic form of material degradation. Traditional techniques like finite element analysis (FEA) have been utilized for …
- 230000007797 corrosion 0 title abstract description 167
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Soomro et al. | Integrity assessment of corroded oil and gas pipelines using machine learning: A systematic review | |
Mazumder et al. | Failure risk analysis of pipelines using data-driven machine learning algorithms | |
Zou et al. | Probabilistic investigations into the value of information: a comparison of condition-based and time-based maintenance strategies | |
Adumene et al. | Dynamic risk analysis of marine and offshore systems suffering microbial induced stochastic degradation | |
Imran et al. | Application of artificial intelligence in marine corrosion prediction and detection | |
Akhlaghi et al. | Predictive deep learning for pitting corrosion modeling in buried transmission pipelines | |
Balbín et al. | Pit to crack transition and corrosion fatigue lifetime reduction estimations by means of a short crack microstructural model | |
Bhandari et al. | Pitting degradation modeling of ocean steel structures using Bayesian network | |
Al-Sabaeei et al. | Prediction of oil and gas pipeline failures through machine learning approaches: A systematic review | |
Sarwar et al. | Enhancing pipeline integrity: a comprehensive review of deep learning-enabled finite element analysis for stress corrosion cracking prediction | |
Ma et al. | Deeppipe: Theory-guided neural network method for predicting burst pressure of corroded pipelines | |
Velázquez et al. | Probabilistic and statistical techniques to study the impact of localized corrosion defects in oil and gas pipelines: a review | |
Wolodko et al. | Modeling of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in the oil and gas industry-past, present and future | |
Lu et al. | A feature selection–based intelligent framework for predicting maximum depth of corroded pipeline defects | |
Keprate et al. | Fatigue and fracture degradation inspection of offshore structures and mechanical items: the state of the art | |
Ling et al. | Data modeling techniques for pipeline integrity assessment: A state-of-the-art survey | |
Hussain et al. | Review of prediction of stress corrosion cracking in gas pipelines using machine learning | |
Cid-Galiot et al. | Fault-tolerance techniques and global positioning systems based on artificial intelligence for the analysis of corrosion impact on the pipelines of oil and gas industry | |
Vachtsevanos et al. | Corrosion Processes | |
Aditiyawarman et al. | The study of artificial intelligent in risk-based inspection assessment and screening: A study case of inline inspection | |
Lin et al. | Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the area of corrosion protection | |
Soomro et al. | Analysis of machine learning models and data sources to forecast burst pressure of petroleum corroded pipelines: A comprehensive review | |
Wang et al. | Structural health monitoring of oil and gas pipelines: Developments, applications and future directions | |
Hussain et al. | Energy Pipeline Degradation Condition Assessment Using Predictive Analytics–Challenges, Issues, and Future Directions | |
Thodi et al. | The development of posterior probability models in risk‐based integrity modeling |