Rathnayake et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Process simulation based life cycle assessment for bioethanol production from cassava, cane molasses, and rice strawRathnayake et al., 2018
View PDF- Document ID
- 17708223126615565437
- Author
- Rathnayake M
- Chaireongsirikul T
- Svangariyaskul A
- Lawtrakul L
- Toochinda P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of cleaner production
External Links
Snippet
The process simulation technique is integrated into life cycle assessment (LCA) in this study to reduce biased parameters in process data collection and perform a fair comparison among different processes. Bioethanol production processes from cassava, cane molasses …
- 238000000034 method 0 title abstract description 161
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste
- Y02E50/34—Methane
- Y02E50/343—Methane production by fermentation of organic by-products, e.g. sludge
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels
- Y02E50/12—Gas turbines for biofeed
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels
- Y02E50/13—Bio-diesel
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Rathnayake et al. | Process simulation based life cycle assessment for bioethanol production from cassava, cane molasses, and rice straw | |
| Papong et al. | Life-cycle energy and environmental analysis of bioethanol production from cassava in Thailand | |
| Cherubini | GHG balances of bioenergy systems–Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns | |
| Khatiwada et al. | Energy and GHG balances of ethanol production from cane molasses in Indonesia | |
| Fuess et al. | Diversifying the technological strategies for recovering bioenergy from the two-phase anaerobic digestion of sugarcane vinasse: An integrated techno-economic and environmental approach | |
| Lijó et al. | Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops | |
| Rocha et al. | Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: a meta-analysis | |
| Hoffman et al. | Techno-economic assessment of open microalgae production systems | |
| Portugal-Pereira et al. | Agricultural and agro-industrial residues-to-energy: Techno-economic and environmental assessment in Brazil | |
| Harsono et al. | Energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and economics of biochar production from palm oil empty fruit bunches | |
| Tonini et al. | Environmental implications of the use of agro‐industrial residues for biorefineries: Application of a deterministic model for indirect land‐use changes | |
| Lora et al. | Issues to consider, existing tools and constraints in biofuels sustainability assessments | |
| Moraes et al. | Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense? | |
| De Vries et al. | Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono-and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy–a life cycle perspective | |
| Ghani et al. | Water-energy-food nexus of bioethanol in Pakistan: A life cycle approach evaluating footprint indicators and energy performance | |
| Fredriksson et al. | Use of on-farm produced biofuels on organic farms–evaluation of energy balances and environmental loads for three possible fuels | |
| Patzek | Thermodynamics of the corn-ethanol biofuel cycle | |
| Wicke et al. | Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications | |
| Cherubini et al. | Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems–A LCA case study | |
| Paschalidou et al. | Energy crops for biofuel production or for food?-SWOT analysis (case study: Greece) | |
| Buonocore et al. | Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: a life cycle assessment perspective | |
| Wang et al. | Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use | |
| Chowdhury et al. | Reduction of environmental and energy footprint of microalgal biodiesel production through material and energy integration | |
| Wang et al. | Energy efficiency and environmental performance of bioethanol production from sweet sorghum stem based on life cycle analysis | |
| Huang et al. | Life cycle assessment of biochar cofiring with coal |