Buonocore et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: a life cycle assessment perspectiveBuonocore et al., 2012
- Document ID
- 8017233456415089794
- Author
- Buonocore E
- Franzese P
- Ulgiati S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Energy
External Links
Snippet
Bioenergy is one of the most dynamic and rapidly changing sectors of the global energy economy. The use of food crops for conversion to biofuel has been criticized for several reasons, among which its competition with the global food chain. Instead, lignocellulosic …
- 238000004519 manufacturing process 0 title abstract description 68
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste
- Y02E50/34—Methane
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
- Y02E50/10—Biofuels
- Y02E50/12—Gas turbines for biofeed
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Buonocore et al. | Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: a life cycle assessment perspective | |
| Pereira et al. | Sustainability assessment of large-scale ethanol production from sugarcane | |
| Cherubini | GHG balances of bioenergy systems–Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns | |
| Evangelisti et al. | Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study | |
| Cavalett et al. | Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil | |
| Rathnayake et al. | Process simulation based life cycle assessment for bioethanol production from cassava, cane molasses, and rice straw | |
| Chen et al. | The socio-economic impacts of introducing circular economy into Mediterranean rice production | |
| Ali et al. | Green waste to biogas: Renewable energy possibilities for Thailand's green markets | |
| Moraes et al. | Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense? | |
| Poeschl et al. | Environmental impacts of biogas deployment–Part I: life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air | |
| Ghani et al. | Water-energy-food nexus of bioethanol in Pakistan: A life cycle approach evaluating footprint indicators and energy performance | |
| Poeschl et al. | Environmental impacts of biogas deployment–Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways | |
| González-García et al. | Comparative environmental and energy profiles of potential bioenergy production chains in Southern Europe | |
| Wicke et al. | Different palm oil production systems for energy purposes and their greenhouse gas implications | |
| Fahd et al. | Cropping bioenergy and biomaterials in marginal land: the added value of the biorefinery concept | |
| Ju et al. | Embodied energy and emergy evaluation of a typical biodiesel production chain in China | |
| Yang et al. | Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China–a case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County | |
| Ulgiati et al. | Material, energy and environmental performance of technological and social systems under a Life Cycle Assessment perspective | |
| Nikodinoska et al. | Wood-based bioenergy value chain in mountain urban districts: an integrated environmental accounting framework | |
| Ren et al. | Optimization of emergy sustainability index for biodiesel supply network design | |
| Kim et al. | Regional variations in greenhouse gas emissions of biobased products in the United States—corn-based ethanol and soybean oil | |
| Wang et al. | Environmental and economic analysis of application of water hyacinth for eutrophic water treatment coupled with biogas production | |
| Liu et al. | Is straw return-to-field always beneficial? Evidence from an integrated cost-benefit analysis | |
| Agostinho et al. | Integrated food, energy and environmental services production as an alternative for small rural properties in Brazil | |
| Djomo et al. | Impact of feedstock, land use change, and soil organic carbon on energy and greenhouse gas performance of biomass cogeneration technologies |