[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Osman et al., 2023 - Google Patents

Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study

Osman et al., 2023

Document ID
177054811228312448
Author
Osman R
Alharbi N
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Prosthodontics

External Links

Snippet

Purpose To compare the accuracy of three intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and precision relative to the scanner acquisition technology and scan capture mode. Scan speed of each scanner was also evaluated. Materials and methods An edentulous maxillary arch …
Continue reading at onlinelibrary.wiley.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A61C9/006—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam projecting one or more stripes or patterns on the teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/225—Fastening prostheses in the mouth

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Richert et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression
Amornvit et al. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners
Medina-Sotomayor et al. Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions
Kau et al. A new method for the 3D measurement of postoperative swelling following orthognathic surgery
Osman et al. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study
Kim et al. The effect of scanning distance on the accuracy of intra‐oral scanners used in dentistry
Mutwalli et al. Trueness and precision of three‐dimensional digitizing intraoral devices
Windisch et al. A new optical method to evaluate three‐dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study
Bhambhani et al. Digitization and its futuristic approach in prosthodontics
Li et al. Trueness and precision of economical smartphone‐based virtual facebow records
Amornvit et al. Confocal 3D Optical Intraoral Scanners and Comparison of Image Capturing Accuracy.
Mühlemann et al. Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within‐subject comparison
Ellakany et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions obtained from intraoral and extraoral dental scanners with different CAD/CAM scanning technologies: an in vitro study
Yee et al. Three‐dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models–part i: system trueness and precision
JP2003190187A (en) Gingival healing abutment attached to dental implant and method for developing prosthetic tooth
Park et al. Impact of orthodontic brackets on the intraoral scan data accuracy
Kernen et al. In vitro scanning accuracy using different aids for multiple implants in the edentulous arch
Amornvit et al. Studying the optical 3D accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vitro study
Hou et al. An overview of three‐dimensional imaging devices in dentistry
Rotar et al. Trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners: a comparative in vitro study
Yee et al. Three‐Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models—Part II: Effect of Model Scanner‐CAD Systems and Articulation Method
Mai et al. Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods
Im et al. Assessment of compatibility between various intraoral scanners and 3D printers through an accuracy analysis of 3D printed models
Al‐Rimawi et al. Trueness of cone beam computed tomography versus intra‐oral scanner derived three‐dimensional digital models: An ex vivo study
Majeed‐Saidan et al. The trueness of scans using one intraoral scanner in different partially edentulous conditions