Amornvit et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scannersAmornvit et al., 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 6175368585002474748
- Author
- Amornvit P
- Rokaya D
- Sanohkan S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- BioMed research international
External Links
Snippet
There have been various developments in intraoral 3D scanning technology. This study is aimed at investigating the accuracy of 10 scanners developed from 2015 to 2020. A maxillary dental model with reference points was printed from Form 2 (FormLabs …
- 238000005259 measurement 0 abstract description 38
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
- A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
- A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
- A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
- A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
- A61C13/0022—Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
- A61C13/0006—Production methods
- A61C13/0013—Production methods using stereolithographic techniques
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
- A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
- A61C9/0093—Workpiece support
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
- A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C1/082—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
- A61C1/084—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills of implanting tools
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/12—Tools for fastening artificial teeth; Holders, clamps, or stands for artificial teeth
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Amornvit et al. | Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners | |
Mangano et al. | Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study | |
Mennito et al. | Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner | |
Revilla‐León et al. | Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner | |
Alsharbaty et al. | A clinical comparative study of 3‐dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques | |
Gimenez‐Gonzalez et al. | An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla | |
Fluegge et al. | A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies—An experimental approach | |
Imburgia et al. | Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study | |
Papaspyridakos et al. | Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes | |
de Villaumbrosia et al. | In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies | |
Mutwalli et al. | Trueness and precision of three‐dimensional digitizing intraoral devices | |
Borbola et al. | In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy | |
Kim et al. | Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies | |
Mühlemann et al. | Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within‐subject comparison | |
Amornvit et al. | Confocal 3D Optical Intraoral Scanners and Comparison of Image Capturing Accuracy. | |
Dauti et al. | Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ COS and conventional impression technique | |
Del Corso et al. | Optical three‐dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility | |
Trifkovic et al. | Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems | |
Yee et al. | Three‐dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models–part i: system trueness and precision | |
Amornvit et al. | Studying the optical 3D accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vitro study | |
Pan et al. | Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer‐aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study? | |
Rotar et al. | Trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners: a comparative in vitro study | |
Sacher et al. | Accuracy of commercial intraoral scanners | |
Kim et al. | Accuracy of scanned stock abutments using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study | |
Sierraalta et al. | Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula |