[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Amornvit et al., 2021 - Google Patents

Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners

Amornvit et al., 2021

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
6175368585002474748
Author
Amornvit P
Rokaya D
Sanohkan S
Publication year
Publication venue
BioMed research international

External Links

Snippet

There have been various developments in intraoral 3D scanning technology. This study is aimed at investigating the accuracy of 10 scanners developed from 2015 to 2020. A maxillary dental model with reference points was printed from Form 2 (FormLabs …
Continue reading at onlinelibrary.wiley.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0022Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0006Production methods
    • A61C13/0013Production methods using stereolithographic techniques
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0093Workpiece support
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C1/082Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
    • A61C1/084Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills of implanting tools
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/12Tools for fastening artificial teeth; Holders, clamps, or stands for artificial teeth

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Amornvit et al. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners
Mangano et al. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study
Mennito et al. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner
Revilla‐León et al. Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of an intraoral scanner
Alsharbaty et al. A clinical comparative study of 3‐dimensional accuracy between digital and conventional implant impression techniques
Gimenez‐Gonzalez et al. An in vitro study of factors influencing the performance of digital intraoral impressions operating on active wavefront sampling technology with multiple implants in the edentulous maxilla
Fluegge et al. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies—An experimental approach
Imburgia et al. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Papaspyridakos et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
de Villaumbrosia et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies
Mutwalli et al. Trueness and precision of three‐dimensional digitizing intraoral devices
Borbola et al. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy
Kim et al. Trueness of ten intraoral scanners in determining the positions of simulated implant scan bodies
Mühlemann et al. Precision of digital implant models compared to conventional implant models for posterior single implant crowns: A within‐subject comparison
Amornvit et al. Confocal 3D Optical Intraoral Scanners and Comparison of Image Capturing Accuracy.
Dauti et al. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ COS and conventional impression technique
Del Corso et al. Optical three‐dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility
Trifkovic et al. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems
Yee et al. Three‐dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models–part i: system trueness and precision
Amornvit et al. Studying the optical 3D accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vitro study
Pan et al. Does the geometry of scan bodies affect the alignment accuracy of computer‐aided design in implant digital workflow: An in vitro study?
Rotar et al. Trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners: a comparative in vitro study
Sacher et al. Accuracy of commercial intraoral scanners
Kim et al. Accuracy of scanned stock abutments using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study
Sierraalta et al. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula