Balasubramanian et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Effects of random dopant fluctuations (RDF) on the single event vulnerability of 90 and 65 nm CMOS technologiesBalasubramanian et al., 2007
- Document ID
- 13328796345596298816
- Author
- Balasubramanian A
- Fleming P
- Bhuva B
- Amusan O
- Massengill L
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
External Links
Snippet
Random dopant fluctuation (RDF) induced threshold voltage variations affect two critical parameters used as a measure of single event (SE) hardness (i) single event transient (SET) pulse widths and (ii) critical charge. This causes an increase in the spread of SET pulse …
- 239000002019 doping agent 0 title abstract description 11
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11C—STATIC STORES
- G11C11/00—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor
- G11C11/21—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor using electric elements
- G11C11/34—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor using electric elements using semiconductor devices
- G11C11/40—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor using electric elements using semiconductor devices using transistors
- G11C11/41—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor using electric elements using semiconductor devices using transistors forming static cells with positive feedback, i.e. cells not needing refreshing or charge regeneration, e.g. bistable multivibrator or Schmitt trigger
- G11C11/412—Digital stores characterised by the use of particular electric or magnetic storage elements; Storage elements therefor using electric elements using semiconductor devices using transistors forming static cells with positive feedback, i.e. cells not needing refreshing or charge regeneration, e.g. bistable multivibrator or Schmitt trigger using field-effect transistors only
- G11C11/4125—Cells incorporating circuit means for protection against loss of information
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
- G06F17/5036—Computer-aided design using simulation for analog modelling, e.g. for circuits, spice programme, direct methods, relaxation methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5045—Circuit design
- G06F17/505—Logic synthesis, e.g. technology mapping, optimisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5068—Physical circuit design, e.g. layout for integrated circuits or printed circuit boards
- G06F17/5081—Layout analysis, e.g. layout verification, design rule check
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—BASIC ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H01L2924/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements or methods for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies as covered by H01L24/00
- H01L2924/0001—Technical content checked by a classifier
- H01L2924/0002—Not covered by any one of groups H01L24/00, H01L24/00 and H01L2224/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
- G06F2217/78—Power analysis and optimization
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—BASIC ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K3/00—Circuits for generating electric pulses; Monostable, bistable or multistable circuits
- H03K3/02—Generators characterised by the type of circuit or by the means used for producing pulses
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2217/00—Indexing scheme relating to computer aided design [CAD]
- G06F2217/70—Fault tolerant, i.e. transient fault suppression
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Huang et al. | A high performance SEU tolerant latch | |
Zhou et al. | Gate sizing to radiation harden combinational logic | |
Kang et al. | Estimation of statistical variation in temporal NBTI degradation and its impact on lifetime circuit performance | |
Naseer et al. | Critical charge characterization for soft error rate modeling in 90nm SRAM | |
Garg | Analysis and design of resilient VLSI circuits: mitigating soft errors and process variations | |
Maheshwari et al. | Trading off transient fault tolerance and power consumption in deep submicron (DSM) VLSI circuits | |
Ahlbin et al. | Effect of multiple-transistor charge collection on single-event transient pulse widths | |
Rossi et al. | Impact of bias temperature instability on soft error susceptibility | |
Cannon et al. | The impact of aging effects and manufacturing variation on SRAM soft-error rate | |
Yibai et al. | Impact of circuit placement on single event transients in 65 nm bulk CMOS technology | |
Samandari-Rad et al. | Confronting the variability issues affecting the performance of next-generation SRAM design to optimize and predict the speed and yield | |
Balasubramanian et al. | Effects of random dopant fluctuations (RDF) on the single event vulnerability of 90 and 65 nm CMOS technologies | |
Xiong et al. | Single-Event Upset Cross-Section Trends for D-FFs at the 5-and 7-nm Bulk FinFET Technology Nodes | |
Du et al. | A layout-level approach to evaluate and mitigate the sensitive areas of multiple SETs in combinational circuits | |
Yankang et al. | Impact of pulse quenching effect on soft error vulnerabilities in combinational circuits based on standard cells | |
Harrington et al. | Empirical modeling of FinFET SEU cross sections across supply voltage | |
Mukhopadhyay et al. | Reduction of parametric failures in sub-100-nm SRAM array using body bias | |
Royer et al. | Evolution of radiation-induced soft errors in FinFET SRAMs under process variations beyond 22nm | |
Cao et al. | SE response of guard-gate FF in 16-and 7-nm bulk FinFET technologies | |
Uemura et al. | Neutron-induced soft-error simulation technology for logic circuits | |
Oliveira et al. | Soft Error Impact on FinFET and CMOS XOR Logic Gates | |
Kou et al. | Impact of process variations on reliability and performance of 32-nm 6T SRAM at near threshold voltage | |
Brendler et al. | Evaluating the impact of process variability and radiation effects on different transistor arrangements | |
Garg et al. | 3D simulation and analysis of the radiation tolerance of voltage scaled digital circuit | |
Asenov et al. | Combining process and statistical variability in the evaluation of the effectiveness of corners in digital circuit parametric yield analysis |