Abstract
The efficiency and robustness are two key performance indexes for first-order reliability method (FORM). In this study, two different algorithms, including the adaptive stability transformation method (ASTM) and enhanced adaptive stability transformation method (EASTM), are proposed to improve the efficiency and robustness of FORM. In both ASTM and EASTM, the computation of most probable failure point (MPFP) is converted to find a series of most probable target points (MPTPs), in which the chaos control factor is properly selected by proposing two different algorithms. Four benchmark examples with normal and non-normal random variables and one practical engineering application example are tested to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The results illustrate that the proposed algorithms not only are more efficient than other advanced FORM algorithms, but also are very robust.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rashki M, Miri M, Azhdary MM (2012) A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point. Struct Saf 39(11):22–29
Lee IJ, Shin J, Choi KK (2013) Equivalent target probability of failure to convert high-reliability model to low-reliability model for efficiency of sampling-based RBDO. Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(2):235–248
Keshtegar B, Baharom S, El-Shafie A (2017) Self-adaptive conjugate method for a robust and efficient performance measure approach for reliability-based design optimization. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0529-7
Zhang D, Han X, Jiang C, Liu J, Li Q (2017) Time-dependent reliability analysis through response surface method. J Mech Des 139(4):041404
Lim J, Lee B, Lee I (2016) Post optimization for accurate and efficient reliability-based design optimization using second-order reliability method based on importance sampling and its stochastic sensitivity analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 107(2):93–108
Jiang C, Han S, Ji M, Han X (2015) A new method to solve the structural reliability index based on homotopy analysis. Acta Mech 226(4):1067–1083
Du XP, Chen W (2004) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J Mech Des 126(2):225–233
Li G, Meng Z, Hu H (2015) An adaptive hybrid approach for reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(5):1051–1065
Rashki M, Miri M, Moghaddam MA (2014) A simulation-based method for reliability based design optimization problems with highly nonlinear constraints. Autom Constr 47(11):24–36
Meng Z, Zhou HL, Li G, Hu H (2017) A hybrid sequential approximate programming method for second-order reliability-based design optimization approach. Acta Mech 228(5):1965–1978
Lee JO, Yang YS, Ruy WS (2002) A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization. Comput Struct 80(3–4):257–269
Meng Z, Li G, Wang BP, Hao P (2015) A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 146(1):32–43
Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) Exact and invariant second moment code format. J Eng Mech Div Asce 100(1):111–121
Rackwitz R, Fiessler B (1978) Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9(5):489–494
Zhang Y, Der Kiureghian A (1995) Two improved algorithms for reliability analysis. Reliability and optimization of structural systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 297–304
Periçaro GA, Santos SR, Ribeiro AA, Matioli LC (2015) HLRF–BFGS optimization algorithm for structural reliability. Appl Math Model 39(7):2025–2035
Lopez RH, Torii AJ, Miguel LFF, Souza Cursi JE (2015) Overcoming the drawbacks of the FORM using a full characterization method. Struct Saf 54(5):57–63
Santos SR, Matioli LC, Beck AT (2012) New optimization algorithms for structural reliability analysis. Cmes Comp Model Eng 83(1):23–55
Yang DX, Li G, Cheng GD (2006) Convergence analysis of first order reliability method using chaos theory. Comput Struct 84(8–9):563–571
Meng Z, Li G, Yang DX, Zhan L (2017) A new directional stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55(2):601–612
Keshtegar B (2017) A hybrid conjugate finite-step length method for robust and efficient reliability analysis. Appl Math Model 45(5):226–237
Keshtegar B (2016) Chaotic conjugate stability transformation method for structural reliability analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 310:866–885
Keshtegar B (2017) Limited conjugate gradient method for structural reliability analysis. Eng Comput 33(3):621–629
Yang DX (2010) Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simula 15(10):3131–3141
Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121(4):557–564
Petkov BH, Vitale V, Mazzola M, Lanconelli C, Lupi A (2015) Chaotic behaviour of the short-term variations in ozone column observed in Arctic. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 26(1–3):238–249
Pingel D, Schmelcher P, Diakonos FK (2004) Stability transformation: a tool to solve nonlinear problems. Phys Rep 400(2):67–148
Schmelcher P, Diakonos FK (1998) General approach to the localization of unstable periodic orbits in chaotic dynamical systems. Phys Rev E 57(3):2739–2746
Liu PL, Der Kiureghian A (1991) Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Struct Saf 9(3):161–177
Acknowledgements
The supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11602076 and 51605127), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 1708085QA06) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. JZ2016HGBZ0751) are much appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, Z., Pu, Y. & Zhou, H. Adaptive stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability method. Engineering with Computers 34, 671–683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0566-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-017-0566-2