A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment

• Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(2), 40–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Arter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). An NCME instructional module on: Using portfolio of student work in instruction and assessment.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 36–45.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.Higher Education, 32, 347–364.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.),Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3–29). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.),Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of quality and standards (pp. 13–36). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1996).Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cronin, J. F. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 78–80.

  Google Scholar 

• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment in teaching in context.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dierick, S., Dochy, F., & Van de Watering, G. (2001). Assessment in het hoger onderwijs: Over de implicaties van nieuwe toetsvormen voor de edumetrie. [Assessment in higher education: About the implications of new assessment forms for edumetrics].Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, 19(1), 2–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Dochy, F. J. R. C., & McDowell, L. (1998). Assessment as a tool for learning.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279–298.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Frederiksen, N. (1984). The real test bias, influences of testing and teaching on learning.American Psychologist, 39(3), 198–202.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gibbs, G. (1992).Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol, UK: Technical and Educational Services.

  Google Scholar 

• Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). The influence of assessment on learning. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.),Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of quality and standards (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Hart, D. (1994).Authentic assessment: A handbook for education. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment.Higher Educational Research & Development, 17(3), 305–322.

  Google Scholar 

• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., & Fishman, B. J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.),Desinging environments for constructive learning (pp. 88–108). Berlin: Springer-Verslag.

  Google Scholar 

• Huang, H. M. (2002). Towards constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments.British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 27–37.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L. & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Vol. Eds.),Computer-supported collaborative learning: Vol. 3. What we know about CSCL_. And implementing it in higher education (pp. 3–30). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

  Google Scholar 

• Martens, R., Bastians, Th., & Gulikers, J. (2002). Leren met computergebaseerde authentieke taken: motivatie, gedrag en resultaten van studenten [Learning with computer-based authentic tasks: student motivation, behavior and results].Pedagogische Studiën, 79(6), 469–482.

  Google Scholar 

• McDowell, L. (1995). The impact of innovative assessment on student learning.Innovations in Education and Training International, 32(4), 302–313.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, C. (1992). What's the difference between authentic and performance assesment?Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Moerkerke, G., Doorten, M., & de Roode, F. A. (1999).Constructie van toetsen voor competentiegericht curricula [Construction of assessments for competency-based curricula] (OTEC report 1999/W02). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland, Educational Technology Expertise Center.

  Google Scholar 

• Newmann, F. M. (1997). Authentic assessment in social studies: Standards and examples. In G. D. Phye (Ed.).Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 359–380). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards for authentic instruction.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an understanding of authentic learning: Student perceptions of an authentic classroom.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 79–94.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Petraglia, J. (1998).Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: From testing to teaching.ELT Journal, 49(1), 13–25.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reeves, T. C., & Okey, J. R. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.).Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191–202). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out.Educational Leadership, 16(9), 13–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Sambell K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(4), 391–402.

  Google Scholar 

• Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). But is it fair?: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessments.Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 349–371.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Savery, J., & Duffy, T. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework.Educational Technology, 35, 31–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Schnitzer, S. (1993). Designing and authentic assessment.Educational Leadership, 50(7), 32–35.

  Google Scholar 

• Segers, M., Dierick, S., & Dochy, F. (2001). Quality standards for new modes of assessment. An exploratory study of the consequential validity of the OverAll test.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16(4), 569–586.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2003).Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Segers, M., Dochy, F., & De Corte, E. (1999). Assessment practices and students' knowledge profiles in a problem-based curriculum.Learning Environments Research, 2, 191–213.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: An international perspective.Journal of Educational Research, 33, 231–243.

  Google Scholar 

• Sluijsmans, D. (2002).Student involvement in assessment: the training of peer assessment skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design.Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Torrance, H. (1995).Evaluating authentic assessment. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Uhlenbeck, A. (2002).The development of an assessment procedure for beginning teachers of English as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997).Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications

  Google Scholar 

• Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (authentic) test.Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiggins, G. P. (1993).Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

  Google Scholar 

Download references