New Insights Into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment

• Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Alter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational, Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 36–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Atkins, M. (1995). What should we be assessing? In P. K. Knight (Ed.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp.24–33). London: Kogan Page.

  Google Scholar 

• Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorizing. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M. (1996). Assessment 2000: Toward a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F.J.R.C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievement, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 3–29). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M. (Sept. 13, 2000). New insights into learning and teaching and the implications for assessment. Keynote address at First Conference of the Special Interest Group on Assessment and Evaluation of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). Maastricht, The Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Birenbaum, M., & Amdur, L. (1999). Reflective active learning in a graduate course on assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(2), 201–218.

  Google Scholar 

• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1) 7–74.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspectives and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspective on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13–20.

  Google Scholar 

• Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175–190.

  Google Scholar 

• Cunningham, J. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (1996). Epistemology and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 36–60.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1994). Capturing teachers’ knowledge: Performance assessment. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 11–18.

  Google Scholar 

• Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1998). Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 14–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Derry, S. J. (1996). Cognitive schema theory in the constructivist debate. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 163–174.

  Google Scholar 

• Dewey, J. (1981). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boyston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1925).

  Google Scholar 

• Dierick, S., & Dochy, F. (2001). New lines in edumetrics: new forms of assessment lead to new assessment criteria. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 307–329

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1997). Assessment as a major influence on learning and instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(5), 415–432

  Google Scholar 

• Dunbar, S. B., Koretz, D. M., & Hoover, H. D. (1991). Quality control in the development and use of performance assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 289–303.

  Google Scholar 

• Eisenhart, M. (2001). Educational ethnography, past, present, and future: Ideas to think with. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 16–27.

  Google Scholar 

• Entwistle, N. J., & Entwistle, A. (1991). Constructing forms of understanding for degree examination: the student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22, 205–227.

  Google Scholar 

• Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 67–83.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edition) (pp. 37–49). New York: Macmillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Feuerstein, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, andpractice. New York: Teachers College Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. Bergman Ramos trans.) Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin

  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Palmer Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Glatthorn, A. A., & Jailall, J. (2000). Curriculum for the new millenium. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Education in a new era (pp. 97–121). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

  Google Scholar 

• Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialogue (pp. 17–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  Google Scholar 

• Harasim, L. (1989). Online education. A new domain. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education (pp. 50–62). Oxford: Pergamon.

  Google Scholar 

• Jarvis, P., Holford, J., & Griffin, C. (1998). The theory andpractice of learning. London: Kogan Page.

  Google Scholar 

• Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S, & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont portfolio assessment program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement; Issues and Practice, 13(3), 5–16.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Linn, R. L. (1994). Performance assessment: Policy promises and technical measurement standards. Educational Researcher, 23(9), 4–14.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology’s second metaphor. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 151–161.

  Google Scholar 

• McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? In A. Herrmann and M. M. Kulski (Eds.), Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 2–4 February 2000. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. Available: >http://www.cleo.murdoch.edu.au/confs/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html<

  Google Scholar 

• Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2) 5–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Moss, P. A. (1996). Enlarging the dialogue in educational measurement: Voice from interpretive research traditions. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 20–28, 43.

  Google Scholar 

• Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1997). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development (pp. 9–27). London: Blackwell.

  Google Scholar 

• Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227–242.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Perkins, D. N., & Blythe, T. (1994). Putting understanding up front. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 11–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.

  Google Scholar 

• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, (pp. 451–502). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Popam, W. J. (2001). The truth about testing. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

  Google Scholar 

• Prawat, R. S. (1996). Constructivism, modern and postmodern. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 215–225.

  Google Scholar 

• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and earning in higher education: the case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12, 275–286.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 651–685). San Diego: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Sarig, G. (1996). Academic literacy as ways of getting to know: What can be assessed? In M. Birenbaum, & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 161–199). Boston, MA: Kluwer.

  Google Scholar 

• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosingjust one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sternberg, R. J. (1986). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. NY: Viking

  Google Scholar 

• Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442.

  Google Scholar 

• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Sensory experience, abstraction, and teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 369–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Vosniadou, S. (1996). Towards a revised cognitive psychology for new advances in learning and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 6(2), 95–110.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Worthen, B. R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74, 444–456.

  Google Scholar 

• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. K. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–25). New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

Download references